Parental Kidnapping: Can Laws Stem the Tide?

1993 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 417-445 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan L. Pollet

This article addresses the phenomenon of parental kidnapping and the legislative response to it. It includes a discussion of the federal civil response—more particularly, the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act, the Parental Kidnapping Prevention Act of 1980, and the 1980 Hague Convention of the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction and its implementing federal legislation. A discussion of the criminal response includes a summary of The Missing Children Act of 1982, The Missing Children's Assistance Act of 1984, The National Child Search Assistance Act of 1990, state criminal laws, and the topic of clearinghouses. There is also an analysis of civil case law involving suits arising out of loss of custody, custodial interference and related torts. The article concludes with a treatment of ways to prevent parental kidnapping, as well as recommendations regarding future legislation and judicial efforts.

2015 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 683
Author(s):  
Nigel Lowe

This article discusses the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction which, despite having been in existence for over 30 years, continues to present a number of uncertainties for Contracting States. The article focuses on the issues around appealing return orders after a child has been taken out of the jurisdiction, the concept of “habitual residence”, and the non-enforcement of return orders with reference to recent case law from the United States, United Kingdom, New Zealand and the European Union. 


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (56) ◽  
pp. 39
Author(s):  
Leticia Virginia LEIDENS

ABSTRACTThis is a study of the 1980 Convention on Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, an instrument of protection of children in the international sphere, specifically when they are subjected to the change of usual residence, resulting from the act of retention or illegal transfer of the parent. The issues include the verification of the contents of two conventional articles, which lack subjectivity in the normative plan and allow the judge to dismiss the order of return of the child to the State of usual residence. The option for methodological verification consists of the case law verification of the topic, more thoroughly with regard as to how they are materialized in Brazilian practice.KEYWORDS: Application; Exception articles; Hague Convention; Interpretation; Jurisprudence.RESUMOTrata-se de um estudo da Convenção sobre Aspectos Civis do Sequestro Internacional de Crianças de 1980, instrumento de proteção da criança no plano internacional, especificamente quando esta se encontra submetida à mudança de residência habitual, decorrente do ato de retenção ou transferência ilícita do genitor(a). A problemática perpassa na verificação do teor de dois artigos convencionais, os quais carecem de objetividade no plano normativo e permitem que o julgador afaste a ordem de retorno da criança ao Estado de residência habitual. A opção metodológica verificativa consiste na averiguação jurisprudencial do tema, detidamente em como eles se materializam na prática brasileira.PALAVRAS-CHAVE: Aplicação; Artigos exceções; Convenção da Haia; Interpretação; Jurisprudência. 


Author(s):  
Tetiana Fuley ◽  
Oksana Kuchiv

The article is focused on the most essential issues of the application of the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction of 25 October 1980 (“the Hague Convention”) in the judgements of Ukrainian courts and some methodological aspects of workshop development on the topic. The Hague Convention recently has been applied more often as an important international act. Moreover, there are at least 3 judgements of the European Court of Human Rights v. Ukraine on the matter (Chabrowski v. Ukraine, no. 61680/10, 17 January 2013; Vilenchik v. Ukraine, no. 21267/14, 3 October 2017, M.R. and D.R. v. Ukraine, no. 63551/13, 22 May 2018). The Court reiterates that in the area of international child abduction, the obligations that Article 8 of the ECHR imposes on the Contracting State must be interpreted, in particular, in the light of the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction of 25 October 1980 which also attaches paramount importance to the best interests of the child. Therefore such a topic was selected for a workshop to be developed and implemented in the educational process of the National School of Judges of Ukraine (NSJU). According to the Concept of National Standards of Judicial Training, which was approved by the Science and Methodology Council of the NSJU, and later became a part of the Rules of Procedure of the NSJU, all training courses for judges and candidates are developed taking into consideration three dimensions – so-called 3D (dimension) – which encompass knowledge, skills, and values. Therefore the workshop on the Hague Convention is designed using all 3D, and is aimed to consolidate knowledge and to develop judicial skills in application of the Hague Convention, Article 8 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ECHR) and ECtHR case law as well as to contribute to strengthening of the values of respect for human rights, rule of law, and enforcement of Ukraine’s international obligations. In order to achieve these goals, there certain tools and techniques that are effective in basic courses on the ECtHR case-law were used. In particular, the use of interactive adult learning methods – mini lectures, filling the analytical framework, video review, express survey etc. The development of the workshops took place jointly with a scientific research in this field, specifically focused of the new Supreme Court jurisprudence, the best practices and lessons learned. The results of the research has been used for the workshop development with the help of the modern innovative tools. Key words: Hague Convention of 25 October 1980 (Convention of Abduction), international child abduction, place of ordinary residence, Article 8 of the ECHR, practice of the ECHR, judicial education, methodological support, workshop.


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 671
Author(s):  
Carmen Azcárraga Monzonís

Resumen: Sustracción internacional a España de menor residente en Suiza en aplicación del Con­venio de La Haya de 1980 sobre los aspectos civiles de la sustracción internacional de menores. Discre­pancia sobre la residencia habitual del menor. No se aprecian motivos de no retorno.Palabras clave: sustracción internacional de menores, Convenio de La Haya sobre sustracción, Convenio de La Haya sobre responsabilidad parental y protección de menores, residencia habitualAbstract: International abduction to Spain of a minor residing in Switzerland under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction of 1980. Discrepancy about the habi­tual residence of the minor. No grounds for return denial are appreciated.Keywords: international child abduction, Hague Convention on Child Abduction, Hague Conven­tion on Parental Responsibility and Measures of the Protection of Children, habitual residence


2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (18) ◽  
pp. 129
Author(s):  
Nuria González Martín

The approach taken by society toward dispute resolution in child custody cases has historically been seen as litigation versus mediation. Given the current volume of cross-border family-related disputes, this binary approach no longer makes sense. In this note, I provide a brief introduction to mediation in Mexico, especially Mexico City. I also analyze other ideas regarding International Child Abduction by one of the Parents and International Family Mediation between Mexico and the USA.


Author(s):  
Yu.A. Marks ◽  

The article is devoted to considering cases on the return of a child or on the exercising access rights in relation to a child on the basis of the Hague Convention on Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction of 1980. The importance of cases concerning the return of a child or the exercise of access rights in respect of a child necessitates theoretical development not only of the procedural institutions, which norms regulate the examination of this category of cases by the courts, but also an analysis of the substantive aspects of disputes concerning the return of a child or the exercise of access rights in respect of a child on the basis of the 1980 Convention. According to the author, the relationship between substantive and procedural law is reflected in the principle of the best interests of the child, the subject of judicial protection, the specifics of the protection means and the subject of proof, as well as the specifics of the composition and procedural position of the persons involved in the trial of the category under study. Particular attention is paid to the tasks and powers of the central authorities established to ensure the unhindered and effective application of the 1980 Convention. It is proposed to transfer the powers of the central body in this sphere from the Ministry of Education of the Russian Federation to the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation. The development of the institution of mediation, including the active promotion of the expansion of mediation cooperation within the framework of interstate contacts aimed at resolving cases of the category under consideration, seems promising.


Author(s):  
Ruth Gaffney-Rhys

The Concentrate Questions and Answers series offers the best preparation for tackling exam and assignment questions. Each book includes key debates, typical questions, diagram answer plans, suggested answers, author commentary, and tips to gain extra marks. This chapter focuses on international relocation and child abduction. The first question is an essay question that considers the law relating to international relocation, ie how the English courts have dealt with applications to relocate out of the jurisdiction (eg Payne v Payne). The second is a problem question that requires the application of the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects on International Child Abduction 1980 and the EU Regulations (BIIR), but also considers the law that applies if a child is taken to England and Wales from a country that has not ratified the Hague Convention.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document