scholarly journals The Role of Chest Radiography in Patients Presenting with Anterior Chest Pain to the Accident & Emergency Department

1988 ◽  
Vol 81 (11) ◽  
pp. 626-628 ◽  
Author(s):  
N J Russell ◽  
C F A Pantin ◽  
P A Emerson ◽  
N J Crichton
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Chest Pain ◽  
Chest Radiography ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Junior Doctors ◽  
X Rays ◽  
Chest X Ray ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Routine Chest

The chest radiological findings and outcomes of 120 consecutive patients attending the Accident & Emergency Department with anterior chest pain were recorded prospectively to investigate the value of routine chest radiography in their management. Twenty-one patients (17.5%) were excluded because of incomplete information. Thirty-seven radiological abnormalities were identified in 33 (33%) of the remaining 99 chest X-rays. Seventeen of the abnormalities identified in 14 (14%) of the chest X-rays were clinically significant. The casualty officer's interpretation of 70 (70%) of the chest X-rays was correct, but 36 errors were made interpreting the other 29 chest X-rays. Of these errors, 19 were false negative errors, resulting in the mismanagement of two patients and 17 false positive errors, resulting in the mismanagement of four patients. It appears that a routine chest X-ray provides little information of practical value in the management of patients with anterior chest pain attending an Accident & Emergency Department, unless the training of medical students and junior doctors in the interpretation of chest X-rays is improved.

scholarly journals The influence of chest X-ray results on antibiotic prescription for childhood pneumonia in the emergency department

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josephine S. van de Maat ◽  
Daniella Garcia Perez ◽  
Gertjan J. A. Driessen ◽  
Anne-Marie van Wermeskerken ◽  
Frank J. Smit ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Respiratory Tract ◽  
Respiratory Tract Infections ◽  
Antibiotic Prescription ◽  
Treatment Decisions ◽  
X Rays ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Chest X Ray ◽  
Tract Infections

AbstractThe aim of this study is to evaluate the influence of chest X-ray (CXR) results on antibiotic prescription in children suspected of lower respiratory tract infections (RTI) in the emergency department (ED). We performed a secondary analysis of a stepped-wedge, cluster randomized trial of children aged 1 month to 5 years with fever and cough/dyspnoea in 8 EDs in the Netherlands (2016–2018), including a 1-week follow-up. We analysed the observational data of the pre-intervention period, using multivariable logistic regression to evaluate the influence of CXR result on antibiotic prescription. We included 597 children (median age 17 months [IQR 9–30, 61% male). CXR was performed in 109/597 (18%) of children (range across hospitals 9 to 50%); 52/109 (48%) showed focal infiltrates. Children who underwent CXR were more likely to receive antibiotics, also when adjusted for clinical signs and symptoms, hospital and CXR result (OR 7.25 [95% CI 2.48–21.2]). Abnormalities on CXR were not significantly associated with antibiotic prescription.Conclusion: Performance of CXR was independently associated with more antibiotic prescription, regardless of its results. The limited influence of CXR results on antibiotic prescription highlights the inferior role of CXR on treatment decisions for suspected lower RTI in the ED. What is Known:• Chest X-ray (CXR) has a high inter-observer variability and cannot distinguish between bacterial or viral pneumonia.• Current guidelines recommend against routine use of CXR in children with uncomplicated respiratory tract infections (RTIs) in the outpatient setting. What is New:• CXR is still frequently performed in non-complex children suspected of lower RTIs in the emergency department• CXR performance was independently associated with more antibiotic prescriptions, regardless of its results, highlighting the inferior role of chest X-rays in treatment decisions.

scholarly journals Role of peak expiratory flow rate and chest radiography in children above 5 years of age with acute asthma

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 372
Author(s):  
Sankeerthana Shankarnarayana ◽  
Jaidev M. Devdas ◽  
Sujonitha John ◽  
Habeeb Ullah Khan ◽  
Pavan Hegde
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Oxygen Saturation ◽  
Standard Treatment ◽  
Acute Asthma ◽  
X Rays ◽  
Bronchodilator Therapy ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Chest X Ray

Background: Asthma is a heterogeneous disease characterized by cough, wheeze and shortness of breath that vary in intensity and time with variable expiratory airflow limitation, associated with chronic airway inflammation. Aim of the study was to assess the usefulness of Peak Expiratory Flow Rate [PEFR] and oxygen saturation in determining severity of acute asthma, to measure objective change in PEFR and oxygen saturation following bronchodilator therapy and the role of chest X-rays in acute asthma.Methods: A prospective study of 50 children above 5 years with acute asthma who presented to the emergency department in a tertiary care hospital were included. PEFR and oxygen saturation before and after bronchodilator therapy was measured. Indication for chest X-rays, its clinical correlation and change in standard treatment of acute asthma based on X-ray reports was noted.Results: The mean PEFR and PEFR % of expected was lower in severe asthma when compared to moderate asthma and was statistically significant (p<0.001). The % of expected PEFR before salbutamol therapy was 48.78±14.36, which improved significantly to 67.13±14.22 after treatment (p<0.001). Oxygen saturation before and after salbutamol therapy was 94.96 ± 4.11 and 96.96±2.87 respectively with the change being significant (p value <0.001). Chest X-rays were performed in 12 (24%) children as per standard guidelines, of which 1(9%) was abnormal showing right basal consolidation. Chest X-ray correlated with clinical findings in 1 child and the findings on chest X-ray altered the ongoing treatment by addition of antibiotic.Conclusions: PEFR and oxygen saturation is useful in the emergency department to objectively assess the severity of acute asthma and the response to initial bronchodilator therapy. Chest X-rays are not routinely indicated in the standard treatment of acute asthma.

scholarly journals Erect chest radiography in the setting of the acute abdomen: essential tool or an unnecessary waste of resources?

2010 ◽  
Vol 92 (8) ◽  
pp. 697-699 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Alazzawi ◽  
W Sprenger De Rover ◽  
G Morris-Stiff ◽  
MH Lewis
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Pain ◽  
Chest Radiography ◽  
Acute Abdominal Pain ◽  
Emergency Admission ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Junior Doctors ◽  
X Rays ◽  
New Findings ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Training Schemes

INTRODUCTION It has been suggested that changes to the training schemes of junior doctors and the increased pressure on emergency departments to manage their patients within a limited time might increase the number of unnecessary investigations performed on emergency admission patients. This, in turn, may lead to an increased number of investigations with normal results. In this study we try to analyse the role of the chest X-ray (CXR) as a diagnostic tool in patients presenting with acute abdominal pain. PATIENTS AND METHODS A retrospective study was performed of the request forms and results of all chest radiography performed on patients admitted on the emergency surgical intake with acute abdominal pain through utilisation of the prospec-tively maintained electronic radiology database. The indications were compared to the guidelines published by the Royal College of Radiologists (RCR) which have been adopted as the standard of care. RESULTS A total of 334 chest X-rays were identified of which only 23 (7%) had new findings. Four (1%) patients had free gas under the diaphragm. Of the CXRs, 258 (77%) were reported normal whilst 53 (16%) had old changes which were described in their hospital records and previous radiographs. Of the CXRs with new findings, only 20 were clinically significant and, of these, four (1%) were surgically significant. CONCLUSIONS The majority of CXRs performed on emergency surgical admissions with abdominal pain are unnecessary. By obtaining a clear history, performing a thorough clinical examination and following the RCR guidelines most of the CXRs could be avoided. This would lead to less radiation exposure, reduce delays to diagnosis, and provide significant financial savings.

scholarly journals Derivation of a clinical decision rule for chest radiography in emergency department patients with chest pain and possible acute coronary syndrome

CJEM ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 12 (02) ◽  
pp. 128-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erik P. Hess ◽  
Jeffrey J. Perry ◽  
Pam Ladouceur ◽  
George A. Wells ◽  
Ian G. Stiell
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Congestive Heart Failure ◽  
Chest Pain ◽  
Chest Radiography ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Chest Radiographs ◽  
Clinical Decision Rule ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
History Of

ABSTRACTObjective:We derived a clinical decision rule to determine which emergency department (ED) patients with chest pain and possible acute coronary syndrome (ACS) require chest radiography.Methods:We prospectively enrolled patients over 24 years of age with a primary complaint of chest pain and possible ACS over a 6-month period. Emergency physicians completed standardized clinical assessments and ordered chest radiographs as appropriate. Two blinded investigators independently classified chest radiographs as “normal,” “abnormal not requiring intervention” and “abnormal requiring intervention,” based on review of the radiology report and the medical record. The primary outcome was abnormality of chest radiographs requiring acute intervention. Analyses included interrater reliability assessment (with κ statistics), univariate analyses and recursive partitioning.Results:We enrolled 529 patients during the study period between Jul. 1, 2007, and Dec. 31, 2007. Patients had a mean age of 59.9 years, 60.3% were male, 4.0% had a history of congestive heart failure and 21.9% had a history of acute myocardial infarction. Only 2.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1%–3.8%) of patients had radiographic abnormality of the chest requiring acute intervention. The κ statistic for chest radiograph classification was 0.81 (95% CI 0.66–0.95). We derived the following rule: patients can forgo chest radiography if they have no history of congestive heart failure, no history of smoking and no abnormalities on lung auscultation. The rule was 100% sensitive (95% CI 32.0%–10.4%) and 36.1% specific (95% CI 32.0%–40.4%).Conclusion:This rule has potential to reduce health care costs and enhance ED patient flow. It requires validation in an independent patient population before introduction into clinical practice.

Portable Ventilation/Perfusion Scanning is Useful for Evaluating Clinically Significant Pulmonary Embolism in the ICU Despite Abnormal Chest Radiography

2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (10) ◽  
pp. 1032-1038 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron S. Weinberg ◽  
William Chang ◽  
Grace Ih ◽  
Alan Waxman ◽  
Victor F. Tapson
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Chest Radiograph ◽  
High Probability ◽  
Hemodynamic Instability ◽  
X Rays ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Abnormal Chest ◽  
Chest X Ray ◽  
Low Probability ◽  
Clinically Significant

Objective: Computed tomography angiography is limited in the intensive care unit (ICU) due to renal insufficiency, hemodynamic instability, and difficulty transporting unstable patients. A portable ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) scan can be used. However, it is commonly believed that an abnormal chest radiograph can result in a nondiagnostic scan. In this retrospective study, we demonstrate that portable V/Q scans can be helpful in ruling in or out clinically significant pulmonary embolism (PE) despite an abnormal chest x-ray in the ICU. Design: Two physicians conducted chart reviews and original V/Q reports. A staff radiologist, with 40 years of experience, rated chest x-ray abnormalities using predetermined criteria. Setting: The study was conducted in the ICU. Patients: The first 100 consecutive patients with suspected PE who underwent a portable V/Q scan. Interventions: Those with a portable V/Q scan. Results: A normal baseline chest radiograph was found in only 6% of patients. Fifty-three percent had moderate, 24% had severe, and 10% had very-severe radiographic abnormalities. Despite the abnormal x-rays, 88% of the V/Q scans were low probability for a PE despite an average abnormal radiograph rating of moderate. A high-probability V/Q for PE was diagnosed in 3% of the population despite chest x-ray ratings of moderate to severe. Six patients had their empiric anticoagulation discontinued after obtaining the results of the V/Q scan, and no anticoagulation was started for PE after a low-probability V/Q scan. Conclusion: Despite the large percentage of moderate-to-severe x-ray abnormalities, PE can still be diagnosed (high-probability scan) in the ICU with a portable V/Q scan. Although low-probability scans do not rule out acute PE, it appeared less likely that any patient with a low-probability V/Q scan had severe hypoxemia or hemodynamic instability due to a significant PE, which was useful to clinicians and allowed them to either stop or not start anticoagulation.

scholarly journals Aurea diagnosis of pneumomediastinum. A case report

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 179-183
Author(s):  
Lucio Brugioni ◽  
Francesca De Niederhausern ◽  
Chiara Gozzi ◽  
Pietro Martella ◽  
Elisa Romagnoli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Case Report ◽  
Chest Pain ◽  
Correct Diagnosis ◽  
Young Male ◽  
Differential Diagnoses ◽  
Diagnostic Process ◽  
Acute Aortic Syndrome ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Chest X Ray

Pericarditis and spontaneous pneumomediastinum are among the pathologies that are in differential diagnoses when a patient describes dorsal irradiated chest pain: if the patient is young, male, and long-limbed, it is necessary to exclude an acute aortic syndrome firstly. We present the case of a young man who arrived at the Emergency Department for chest pain: an echocardiogram performed an immediate diagnosis of pericarditis. However, if the patient had performed a chest X-ray, this would have enabled the observation of pneumomediastinum, allowing a correct diagnosis of pneumomediastinum and treatment. The purpose of this report is to highlight the importance of the diagnostic process.

scholarly journals The Role of Serum D-Dimer Level in the Diagnosis of Patients Admitted to the Emergency Department Complaining of Chest Pain

2010 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. 1772-1779 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Orak ◽  
M Üstündağ ◽  
C Güloğlu ◽  
Ö Alyan ◽  
MB Sayhan
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Chest Pain ◽  
D Dimer
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document