A Systematic Review of the Outcome Measures Used to Evaluate Interprofessional Learning by Health Care Professional Students During Clinical Experiences

2020 ◽  
pp. 016327872097881
Author(s):  
Nicole A. Guitar ◽  
Denise M. Connelly
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Clinical Experience ◽  
Interprofessional Education ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Clinical Experiences ◽  
Interprofessional Learning ◽  
Clinical Placements ◽  
Professional Students

Interprofessional education (IPE) occurs when members of more than one health or social care profession learn interactively together to improve interprofessional collaboration and health care delivery. Interprofessional experiences provide students with the skills and knowledge needed to work in a collaborative manner; however, there is no review on the outcome measures used to assess the effectiveness of IPE learning. The current systematic review examined the outcome measures used to assess interprofessional learning during student clinical experiences. An electronic search of databases retrieved trials of health professional students who completed an IPE intervention during a student clinical experience. Methodological quality of twenty-five studies meeting the inclusion criteria published between 1997 and 2018 was scored independently by two raters using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database and the Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research tool. The Interdisciplinary Education Perception Scale was used most frequently to assess interprofessional learning during a student clinical experience. This review provides a summary of outcome measures for educators to consider for evaluation of interprofessional activities during student clinical placements and serves to inform future conversations regarding the use and development of outcome measures to provide evidence for student achievement of IPE objectives and competencies.

scholarly journals Analysis of Facilitators and Barriers to the Delivery of Routine Care during the COVID-19 Global Pandemic: A Systematic Review

Healthcare ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 528
Author(s):  
Cristian Lieneck ◽  
Brooke Herzog ◽  
Raven Krips
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Services ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Routine Care ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Healthcare Organizations ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Global Pandemic ◽  
Facilitators And Barriers

The delivery of routine health care during the COVID-19 global pandemic continues to be challenged as public health guidelines and other local/regional/state and other policies are enforced to help prevent the spread of the virus. The objective of this systematic review is to identify the facilitators and barriers affecting the delivery of routine health care services during the pandemic to provide a framework for future research. In total, 32 articles were identified for common themes surrounding facilitators of routine care during COVID-19. Identified constructed in the literature include enhanced education initiatives for parents/patients regarding routine vaccinations, an importance of routine vaccinations as compared to the risk of COVID-19 infection, an enhanced use of telehealth resources (including diagnostic imagery) and identified patient throughput/PPE initiatives. Reviewers identified the following barriers to the delivery of routine care: conservation of medical providers and PPE for non-routine (acute) care delivery needs, specific routine care services incongruent the telehealth care delivery methods, and job-loss/food insecurity. Review results can assist healthcare organizations with process-related challenges related to current and/or future delivery of routine care and support future research initiatives as the global pandemic continues.

Challenges of Providing Health Care in Complex Emergencies: A Systematic Review

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Hesam Seyedin ◽  
Morteza Rostamian ◽  
Fahimeh Barghi Shirazi ◽  
Haleh Adibi Larijani
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Health Care Delivery ◽  
Qualitative Content Analysis ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Information Access ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Complex Emergencies

Abstract Providing health care in times of complex emergencies (CEs) is one of the most vital needs of people. CEs are situations in which a large part of the population is affected by social unrest, wars, and food shortages. This systematic review study was conducted to identify the challenges of health-care delivery in CEs. We searched terms related to health-care delivery and CEs in PubMed, Web of Sciences, Science Direct, and Google scholar databases, as well as Persian databases SID and Magiran. The searching keywords included: “Health Care, Complex Crises, War, Humanitarian, Refugees, Displaced Persons, Health Services, and Challenges.” Of 409 records, we selected 6 articles based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA) checklist. Studies were analyzed through qualitative content analysis. The results show that CEs affect health-care delivery in 4 primary areas: the workforce, infrastructure, information access, and organization of health services. These areas can pose potential threats for health-care providers and planners at times of emergencies. Thus, they should be informed about these challenges to strengthen the health-care system.

scholarly journals mHealth and Health Care Service Delivery in Africa: A Systematic Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 123
Author(s):  
Austin Eze Egede ◽  
Cajetan Ikechukwu Ilo ◽  
Maryjane Ikechukwu-Nwobodo ◽  
Tessy Amaka Nnaji ◽  
Rita Ihuoma Anaba ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Science Citation Index ◽  
Citation Index ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Care Service ◽  
Health Care Service ◽  
Text Messages ◽  
Science Citation ◽  
Services Delivery

We conducted a systematic review of studies on mHealth and health care services delivery that were carried out within Africa. Our search process was through MEDLINE, and then on PubMed, we searched key terms based on various keywords: “Whatsapp, health, Africa, Text messages, health impact, Africa, mHealth tools, Africa”. This was done in December of 2018. Only English written articles from journals indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded and Social Science Citation Index were incorporated in this review. In line with our inclusion criteria, only a total of 19 out of 155 studies were relevant. Inferences from these studies showed that mHealth tools are speedy and quality means for health care delivery in Africa. We also found out that there is less usage of internet devices in Africa as suspected. There is a serious need for improvement in the use of other online based mHealth tools as it was found that the use of Short Messaging Service (SMS) has been the nearly the sole mHealth intervention utilized in Africa. This, it is believed would foster better wider intervention and implementation of quality health outcomes in Africa, and other low and middle-income regions of the world.

scholarly journals Tobacco-Nicotine Education and Training for Health-Care Professional Students and Practitioners: A Systematic Review

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 531-542 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa Ye ◽  
Catherine Goldie ◽  
Tanvi Sharma ◽  
Sheila John ◽  
Megan Bamford ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Professional ◽  
Education And Training ◽  
Professional Students ◽  
And Training

Interprofessional Collaborative Practice

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shelley Cohen Konrad
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Interprofessional Education ◽  
Health Workers ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Core Competencies ◽  
Collaborative Practice ◽  
Direct Care ◽  
World Health ◽  
Quality Health Care ◽  
Interprofessional Collaborative Practice

The World Health Organization defines interprofessional collaborative practice (IPCP) as when multiple health workers from different professional backgrounds provide comprehensive health services working with patients/clients, families, caregivers, and communities to deliver quality health care across settings. IPCP has long been considered a best practice model to improve effective health-care delivery; however, implementation of collaborative practice models and evidence to support their efficacy have been relatively slow to develop. IPCP is inextricably linked to interprofessional education and practice (IPEP), which brings together students and practitioners across disciplines and practices, and includes direct care workforce, people/patients/clients, families, and communities to learn with, from, and about each other to prepare them for integrated workplace practice. The article will explore national and global interprofessional collaborative practice initiatives; outline core competencies and evidence for collaborative practice; provide examples of IPCP implementation; and discuss the role social work plays in the development and leadership of collaborative practice.

scholarly journals Systematic Review of the Impact of Cancer Survivorship Care Plans on Health Outcomes and Health Care Delivery

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (20) ◽  
pp. 2088-2100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul B. Jacobsen ◽  
Antonio P. DeRosa ◽  
Tara O. Henderson ◽  
Deborah K. Mayer ◽  
Chaya S. Moskowitz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Health Outcomes ◽  
Health Care Delivery ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Survivorship Care Plan ◽  
Satisfaction With Care ◽  
Survivorship Care ◽  
Care Plans

Purpose Numerous organizations recommend that patients with cancer receive a survivorship care plan (SCP) comprising a treatment summary and follow-up care plans. Among current barriers to implementation are providers’ concerns about the strength of evidence that SCPs improve outcomes. This systematic review evaluates whether delivery of SCPs has a positive impact on health outcomes and health care delivery for cancer survivors. Methods Randomized and nonrandomized studies evaluating patient-reported outcomes, health care use, and disease outcomes after delivery of SCPs were identified by searching MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Cochrane Library. Data extracted by independent raters were summarized on the basis of qualitative synthesis. Results Eleven nonrandomized and 13 randomized studies met inclusion criteria. Variability was evident across studies in cancer types, SCP delivery timing and method, SCP recipients and content, SCP-related counseling, and outcomes assessed. Nonrandomized study findings yielded descriptive information on satisfaction with care and reactions to SCPs. Randomized study findings were generally negative for the most commonly assessed outcomes (ie, physical, functional, and psychological well-being); findings were positive in single studies for other outcomes, including amount of information received, satisfaction with care, and physician implementation of recommended care. Conclusion Existing research provides little evidence that SCPs improve health outcomes and health care delivery. Possible explanations include heterogeneity in study designs and the low likelihood that SCP delivery alone would influence distal outcomes. Findings are limited but more positive for proximal outcomes (eg, information received) and for care delivery, particularly when SCPs are accompanied by counseling to prepare survivors for future clinical encounters. Recommendations for future research include focusing to a greater extent on evaluating ways to ensure SCP recommendations are subsequently acted on as part of ongoing care.

scholarly journals Improving Cultural Competency: A Patient-Centered Approach to Interprofessional Education and Practice in a Veterans Healthcare Facility

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 157
Author(s):  
Margaret Brommelsiek ◽  
Jane A. Peterson ◽  
Sarah Knopf Amelung
Keyword(s):  
Health Professional ◽  
Cultural Competency ◽  
Interprofessional Education ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Healthcare Facility ◽  
Military Culture ◽  
Veterans Health ◽  
Professional Students ◽  
Knowledge And Attitudes ◽  
Health Professional Students

Background/Objective: Competency in health professions education when separated from culture is a ‘detached mastery’ of a discreet skill; there are no values considered, no human behind the understanding. This can result in an uneven understanding, proficiency, and commitment concerning individuals’ cultural differences. To increase cultural competency and improve care delivery to veterans, health professional students, participated in an interprofessional education immersion with clinical practicum at a Veteran’s Administration primary care clinic.Methods: Fifty-four graduate students from nursing, clinical psychology, pharmacy and social work participated in an interprofessional education course on military culture. Students’ knowledge and attitudes concerning veterans were evaluated at the start and end of the 8-week immersion course.Results: In both the Knowledge Assessment, a 10-item survey covering the core aspects of the course content, and Health Professionals’ Attitudes Toward Veterans Scale, student knowledge and attitudes improved relating to veterans care.Conclusions: Veterans seeking care in veterans’ and civilian facilities require a culturally competent health professional workforce. Interprofessional education coursework specifically focused on veterans and military culture has shown promise in increasing knowledge and compassion in health professional students working with veteran patients. 

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document