Mitral Valve Repair for Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation in Dilated Cardiomyopathy

2005 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 267-270
Author(s):  
Vijay Kohli ◽  
Harpreet Wasir ◽  
Sanjay Mittal ◽  
Anil Karlekar ◽  
Yatin Mehta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mitral Valve ◽  
Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
Dilated Cardiomyopathy ◽  
Mitral Valve Repair ◽  
Artery Bypass ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Valve Repair ◽  
Severe Left Ventricular Dysfunction

Ischemic mitral regurgitation contributes to poor survival in patients with heart failure. The intermediate-term outcome of mitral reconstruction in 15 patients who had ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy with mitral regurgitation requiring surgical intervention was studied. They underwent mitral valve repair along with coronary artery bypass surgery. The mitral valve coaptation depth was considered an important parameter in deciding on repair. Ages ranged from 43 to 72 years. Left ventricular ejection fractions were 15–38% (mean, 26.5% ± 4.3%). The operative technique in all 15 patients was posterior annuloplasty using Dacron felt. At a mean follow-up of 4.6 ± 1.2 months (1–8 months), postoperative transesophageal echocardiography revealed mild mitral regurgitation in 2 patients and none in 13. There was a significant improvement in New York Heart Association functional class from 3.9 ± 1.1 to 1.9 ± 0.3. Mitral valve repair by posterior felt annuloplasty provides favorable results in the intermediate-term in selected patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and severe left ventricular dysfunction.

scholarly journals Ventricular arrhythmias in patients with functional mitral regurgitation and implantable cardiac devices: implications of mitral valve repair with Mitraclip

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
T Benito Gonzalez ◽  
X Freixa ◽  
C Godino ◽  
M Taramasso ◽  
R Estevez-Loureiro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mitral Valve ◽  
Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
Mitral Valve Repair ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Functional Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
Valve Repair ◽  
One Year ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Limited information has been reported regarding the impact of percutaneous mitral valve repair (PMVR) on ventricular arrhythmic (VA) burden. The aim of this study was to address the incidence of VA and appropriate antitachycardia implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) therapies before and after PMVR. Methods We retrospectively analyzed all consecutive patients with heart failure with reduce left ventricular ejection fraction, functional mitral regurgitation grade 3+ or 4+ and an active ICD or cardiac resynchronizer who underwent PMVR in any of the eleven recruiting centers. Only patients with complete available device VA monitoring from one-year before to one year after PMVR were included. Baseline clinical and echocardiographic characteristics were collected before PMVR and at 12-months follow-up. Results 93 patients (68.2±10.9 years old, male 88.2%) were enrolled. PMVR was successfully performed in all patients and device success at discharge was 91.4%. At 12-months follow-up, we observed a significant reduction in mitral regurgitation severity, NT-proBNP and prevalence of severe pulmonary hypertension and severe kidney disease. Patients also referred a significant improvement in NYHA functional class and showed a non-significant trend to reserve left ventricular remodeling. After PMVR a significant decrease in the incidence of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) (5.0–17.8 vs 2.7–13.5, p=0.002), sustained VT or ventricular fibrillation (0.9–2.5 vs 0.5–2.9, p=0.012) and ICD antitachycardia therapies (2.5–12.0 vs 0.9–5.0, p=0.033) were observed. Conclusion PMVR was related to a reduction in arrhythmic burden and ICD therapies in our cohort. Proportion of patients who presented ven Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

scholarly journals Can We Predict Failure of Mitral Valve Repair?

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 526 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simone Gasser ◽  
Maria von Stumm ◽  
Christoph Sinning ◽  
Ulrich Schaefer ◽  
Hermann Reichenspurner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mitral Valve ◽  
Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Mitral Valve Repair ◽  
Mitral Valve Surgery ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Valve Surgery ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Redo Surgery ◽  
Valve Repair

Objective: To identify echocardiographic and surgical risk factors for failure after mitral valve repair. Methods: We identified a total of 77 consecutive patients from our institutional mitral valve surgery database who required redo mitral valve surgery due to recurrence of mitral regurgitation after primary mitral valve repair. A control group of 138 patients who had a stable echocardiographic long-term result was included based on propensity score matching. Systematic analysis of echocardiographic parameters was performed before primary surgery; after mitral valve repair and prior to redo surgery. Risk factor analysis was performed using multivariate Cox regression model. Results: Redo surgery was associated with the presence of pulmonary hypertension ≥ 50 mmHg (p = 0.02), a mean transmitral gradient > 5 mmHg (p = 0.001), left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 45% (p = 0.05) before surgery and mitral regurgitation ≥moderate at time of discharge (p = 0.002) in the whole cohort. Patients with functional mitral valve regurgitation had a higher tendency to undergo redo surgery if preoperative left ventricular end-diastolic diameter exceeded 65 mm (p = 0.043) and if postoperative tenting height exceeded 6 mm (p = 0.018). Low ejection fraction was not significantly associated with the need for redo mitral valve surgery in the functional subgroup. Conclusions: Recurrent mitral regurgitation is still a valuable problem and is associated with relevant perioperative mortality. Patients with severe mitral regurgitation should undergo early mitral valve repair surgery as long as systolic pulmonary artery pressure is low, left ventricular ejection fraction is preserved, and LVEED is deceeds 65 mm.

Mitigating cardiac dysfunction by TOE-guided cardioplegia and mitral valve repair

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (7) ◽  
pp. 427-430
Author(s):  
Xu Yu Jin ◽  
Rana Sayeed ◽  
John Pepper ◽  
Mario Petrou
Keyword(s):  
Mitral Valve ◽  
Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Transesophageal Echocardiography ◽  
Mitral Valve Repair ◽  
Surgical Repair ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Valve Repair ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction

Based on current guidelines, 15% to 20% of patients undergoing mitral valve repair for regurgitation develop left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction < 50%–55%) despite a normal baseline. Two schools of thought have been debated: preexisting myocardial disease or suboptimal intraoperative myocardial protection. In our view, they could be reconciled. It is well recognized that left ventricular ejection fraction with a standard cut off at 50%–55% has limited sensitivity in detecting early systolic impairment in mitral regurgitation patients. Mitral regurgitation also leads to mitochondrial oxidative stress, thus rendering the myocardium more susceptible to ischemia-reperfusion injury and precipitating postoperative cardiac dysfunction. The fall in left ventricular ejection fraction early after mitral valve repair was shown to be caused by the reduction in both myocardial contractility and left ventricular stroke volume. To mitigate the risk to myocardial reperfusion injury, appropriate cardioplegia volume and distribution and well-defined surgical repair processes are equally important. We use transesophageal echocardiography-guided cardioplegia delivery, imaging the intramyocardial flow and ensuring adequate protection of the subendocardium during mitral valve repair. Mild aortic regurgitation on a beating heart often leads to left ventricular dilatation with diminished cardioplegia flow in the myocardium, thus requiring direct ostia cardioplegia. Systematic transesophageal echocardiography assessment before surgery is essential for establishing the mitral regurgitation mechanisms and translating them into precise surgical repair strategies. The benefits of transesophageal echocardiography-guided cardioplegia delivery warrant further clinical trials in order to evolve into part of a high surgical standard.

Intrinsic cardiac elastography in patients with primary mitral regurgitation: predictive role after mitral valve repair

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tais De Jesus ◽  
Mahmoud M Alashry ◽  
Ratnasari Padang ◽  
Sorin V Pislaru ◽  
Vuyisile T Nkomo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mitral Valve ◽  
Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
Mitral Valve Repair ◽  
Volume Overload ◽  
Normal Subjects ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Valve Repair ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Myocardial Stiffness

Abstract Aims  Chronic volume-overload can impair systolic and diastolic myocardial properties. We tested the hypothesis that Intrinsic Cardiac Elastography may detect alterations in passive myocardial elasticity in patients with chronic severe mitral regurgitation (MR) and predict worsening left ventricular (LV) function after mitral valve repair (MVr). Methods and results  Comprehensive transthoracic echocardiography and cardiac elastography were performed in 80 patients with primary MR (prolapse and/or flail leaflets) of varying severity and compared with 40 normal subjects. In patients who underwent MVr (n = 51), elastography measurements were related to changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at short-term (3–4 days post-op) and mid-term (1 year) follow-up. Most patients were asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic and had preserved LVEF (&gt;60%). Intrinsic velocity propagation (iVP) of myocardial stretch, a direct measure of myocardial stiffness, was higher in patients with severe MR {median 2.0 [interquartile range (IQR) 1.5–2.2] m/s, range 1.1–3.4 m/s; n = 56} compared to normal subjects [median 1.7 (IQR 1.5–1.8) m/s; n = 40; P = 0.0005], but not in those with mild or moderate MR [median 1.7 (IQR 1.4–1.9) m/s; n = 24]. A higher iVP was associated with more severe LV volume-overload and LV and left atrial enlargement (P &lt; 0.05 for all). In patients undergoing MVr, a higher iVP independently predicted a larger drop in LVEF post-intervention (short-term, P = 0.001; 1 year, P = 0.007), incrementally to pre-operative LVEF (P &lt; 0.05). Conclusion  Non-invasive measurements of myocardial stiffness were able to predict functional deterioration after MVr for chronic primary MR. Further studies should investigate the mechanisms and practical utility of this novel measurement.

Multicenter experience: early outcome of mitral valve repair in patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation

2020 ◽  
pp. 021849232097001
Author(s):  
Mohamed Abdelwahab Hussein ◽  
Ayman Ramadan Abdelrehim ◽  
Yasser Shaban M Mubarak
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Mitral Valve ◽  
Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Mitral Valve Repair ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Artery Bypass ◽  
Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
Valve Repair

Background Ischemic mitral regurgitation is associated with poor outcomes. The optimal surgical strategy for management of ischemic mitral regurgitation is still debated. The objective of this study was to evaluate the early mortality and morbidity of mitral valve repair in patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Methods We performed a retrospective, observational, cohort study on prospectively collected data on 136 consecutive coronary artery bypass graft patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation undergoing mitral valve repair between January 2016 and January 2020. Perioperative echocardiogram findings, operative procedures, and outcomes were analyzed. Results The overall mortality rate was 4.4%. Mitral valve repair with a low ejection fraction had a 4-fold increase in the risk of death compared to mitral valve repair with preserved ejection fraction > 30%. However, after adjusting for preoperative risk factors, the number of grafts was not an independent risk factor for mortality (odds ratio = 0.18, 95% confidence interval: 0.03–2.81, p = 0.84). Multivariable analysis showed that preoperative ejection fraction (odds ratio = 1.14, 95% confidence interval: 0.82–4.86, p < 0.01), preoperative left ventricular end-systolic dimension (odds ratio = 1.03, 95% confidence interval: 0.65–3.51, p < 0.01) and preoperative left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (odds ratio = 0.99, 95% confidence interval: 0.64–3.28, p = 0.04) were independent risk factors for mortality. Conclusions Mitral valve repair can be performed safely concomitantly with coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with moderate, moderately severe, and severe ischemic mitral regurgitation.

scholarly journals P337 Edge-to-edge mitral valve repair in patients with secondary mitral regurgitation: impact of tethering pattern on clinical, echocardiographic and procedure-related characteristics

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M J Oneto Fernandez ◽  
M Ruiz Ortiz ◽  
M Delgado Ortega ◽  
A M Rodriguez Almodovar ◽  
R Gonzalez Manzanares ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mitral Valve ◽  
Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
Mitral Valve Repair ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Valve Repair ◽  
Mitral Valve Leaflet ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Secondary Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (E2E-MVR) has emerged as a therapeutical option in patients with secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR). Two tethering patterns (TP) have been described in SMR: symmetric and asymmetric. However, information on the implications of these TP on E2E-MVR is limited. Our aim was to assess the impact of mitral valve TP on clinical, echocardiographic and procedure-related characteristics in patients undergoing E2E-MVR. We consecutively recruited 62 patients with at least moderate SMR who underwent E2E-MVR in our center between 2011 and 2019 and analysed clinical, echocardiographic and procedure-related characteristics according to TP, which we classified into symmetric and asymmetric considering jet direction and mitral valve leaflet position during systole by means of two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (Figure 1). In our series, 43 patients (69.3%) had symmetric TP and 19 (30.7%) had asymmetric TP. Asymmetric TP was associated with ischemic aetiology (52.6% vs 23.3%, p = 0.02) and a non-significant trend to higher frequency of male sex (89.5% vs 67.4%, p = 0.07), diabetes mellitus (52.6% vs 27.9%, p = 0.06), massive regurgitation (78.9% vs 58.1%, p = 0.11) and higher values of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (34 ± 9% vs 28 ± 11%, p = 0.06). There were no differences in procedure-related characteristic between groups, in particular in number of devices (1.63 [IQR 1-2] vs 1.52 [IQR 1-2], p = 0.27), number of graspings (3.21 [IQR 2-4] vs 2.78 [IQR 2-3], p = 0.16) and time of procedure (95 ± 38min vs 107 ± 43min, p = 0.29). Procedural success (defined as SMR severity reduction≥2) was high in both groups (89.5% vs 74.4%, p = 0.18). At discharge, there was a significant reduction in effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA) in (0.36 ± 0.16cm² vs 0.15 ± 0.10cm², p &lt; 0.001) and pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) (46 ± 12mmHg vs 40 ± 12mmHg, p = 0.004). LVEF was impaired in patients with asymmetric TP but not in patients with symmetric TP (difference in LVEF after procedure: -5 ± 9% vs -0 ± 8%, p = 0.03). In our study, asymmetric TP was related to the ischemic aetiology of left ventricular dysfunction. Procedural characteristics, and EROA and PASP reductions at discharge were similar regardless of TP. However, patients with asymmetric TP had a significantly impairment in LVEF, probably because of afterload mismatch phenomenon. Abstract P337 Figure 1: example of tethering patterns

scholarly journals Comparison of flexible, open with semi-rigid, closed annuloplasty-rings for mitral valve repair

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ayse Cetinkaya ◽  
Maryam Waheed ◽  
Karin Bramlage ◽  
Oliver Johannes Liakopoulos ◽  
Mohamed Zeriouh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mitral Valve ◽  
Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
Mitral Valve Repair ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Heart Association ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Functional Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
Valve Repair ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction

Abstract Background Mitral regurgitation is a frequent valvular disease, with an increasing prevalence. We analysed the long-term outcomes of mitral valve repair procedures conducted over the last 10 years in our clinic using almost exclusively two different annuloplasty ring types. Methods A single-centre, retrospective analysis of mitral valve surgeries conducted between January 2005 and December 2015 for patients undergoing first-line mitral valve repair with either open (Cosgrove) or closed (CE Physio / Physio II) annuloplasty (OA or CA, respectively) rings. Results In total, 1120 patient documentations were available of which 528 underwent OA and 592 patients CA. The median age of patients was 64.0 years and 41.1% were female. The majority of these patients underwent the procedure because of degenerative valve disease. Rates of successful repair were about 90%, 72 h procedural mortality was 0.6% and the rate of re-intervention was 0.6% within the first 30 days. Functional (mitral regurgitation, left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular end-diastolic and systolic diameter and New York Heart Association class) as well as hard outcomes were comparable. 77.7 and 74.4% of patients were alive at the 10-year follow-up in the OA and CA groups, respectively. Upon multivariable adjustment, the hazard ratio was 0.926 (95% CI: 0.642–1.3135; p = 0.681). Conclusions The functional outcome and survival rates up to 10 years after mitral valve repair were comparable using open and closed annuloplasty rings. Whether this means these rings are interchangeable or a carefully selection of the best-for-the-patient devices will be subject of future investigations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document