Penetrating injury of the ascending aorta complicating a sternal biopsy

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 146-147
Author(s):  
Hatem Lahdhili ◽  
Mokhles Lajmi ◽  
Moncef Bey ◽  
Saber Hachicha ◽  
Karima Taamallah ◽  
...  

Bone marrow aspiration and trephine biopsy are considered safe procedures. Some serious but rare adverse events directly attributable to these procedures have been related in a few reports in the literature. We report a rare case of ascending aortic injury following a sternal trephine biopsy.

2011 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Sarigianni ◽  
Efthymia Vlachaki ◽  
Sofia Chissan ◽  
Filippos Klonizakis ◽  
Evaggelia Vetsiou ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 201-206
Author(s):  
Kavya J ◽  
Kalpana Kumari MK

Pancytopenia is commonly reported in clinical hematology practice. Due to its varied marrow pathology and underlying ailments, diagnosis is often misleading and delayed. Bone marrow examination would provide a comprehensive diagnosis of both blood and bone marrow, since aspirate investigates the cytological morphology and biopsy evaluates the cellularity, architecture, and compact marrows.To compare bone marrow aspiration and trephine biopsy results in the diagnosis of pancytopenia, and to determine the sensitivity and specificity of aspirate examination in pancytopenia diagnosis.This prospective study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital from July 2014 to June 2016. A total of 320 samples were received at the department of pathology for bone marrow examination (aspirate and biopsy). Romanowsky (Leishman) stain was used to investigate aspirate samples. All biopsy samples were processed into 3-5 μ blocks and stained using hematoxylin and eosin after decalcification with 5.5% EDTA. Data analysis was performed using SPSS19.Pancytopenia constituted 56 (18.7%) cases with the mean age of 41.79 years. Of the total pancytopenia cases, hematological disorders constituted 50 (89.3%) cases and 6 (10.7%) were non-hematological cases. Aspirate and biopsy diagnosis positively correlated in 76.79% of cases. A 100% sensitivity and specificity of aspirate diagnosis was observed in, acute myeloid leukemia, hypersplenism, myelodysplastic syndrome, megaloblastic anemia, hematological malignancy in remission and negative for lymphoma infiltrate. Aspirate had no role in diagnosis of uremic osteodystrophy and myelofibrosis, whereas leishmaniasis was diagnosed on aspirate alone.Pancytopenia includes multiple underlying ailments which requires a differential diagnosis approach. Combining both aspirate and biopsy for diagnosis would benefit the patient in prognosis as they are complementary to each other.


2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (03) ◽  
pp. 182-189
Author(s):  
Meenu Gilotra ◽  
Monika Gupta ◽  
Sunita Singh ◽  
Rajeev Sen

Abstract INTRODUCTION: Bone marrow examination is a useful investigative tool for the diagnosis of many hematological and nonhematological disorders. Bone marrow aspiration (BMA) provides information about the numerical and cytological features of marrow cells, whereas bone marrow trephine biopsies (BMB) provide excellent appreciation of spatial relationships between cells and of overall bone marrow structure. We conducted this study with the objective of comparing the accuracy of BMA with BMB in the diagnosis of various hematological disorders. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Both BMA and BMB were performed on a total of 130 cases and a comparative evaluation was performed in 100 cases to see the complementary role of both the procedures. However, 30 cases were excluded due to inadequate BMA, BMB, or both. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was employed whenever required. RESULTS: In our study of 100 cases, 87% of cases were confirmed on bone marrow biopsy and in remaining 13% of cases final diagnosis was achieved with the help of other ancillary investigations. These cases were excluded for calculation of concordance rate between BMA and BMB. The concordance and disconcordance rate between BMA and BMB was 72.4% and 27.6%, respectively. CONCLUSION: BMA cytology and trephine biopsy histopathology complement each other and the superiority of one method over the other depended on the underlying disorder. Furthermore, application of ancillary techniques such as flow cytometery and IHC proved to be an additional advantage in further typing of various diseases.


2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 207-210
Author(s):  
Hazera Khatun ◽  
Salma Afrose ◽  
Mohiuddin Ahmed Khan ◽  
Tasneem Ara ◽  
Mohammad Sirajul Islam ◽  
...  

Bone marrow aspiration (BMA) and biopsy (BMTB) are important investigations for diagnosis of haematolgical malignancies and non-malignant diseases both in adults and children. BMA and BMTB are complementary and if both are done a comprehensive analysis of bone marrow involvement is possible. 53 cases of BMTB were studied in order to underscore the indications and importance of BMTB. BMTB was done to determine cellularity in aplastic anaemia (AA) (33.96%, n=18) and in cases of failure of aspiration (32.08%, n=17). Failure of aspiration was attributable to bone marrow (BM) fibrosis (76%, n=13) due to acute leukaemia (35.30%, n=6) and myelofibrosis (43.17%, n=7). BMTB upstaged non Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) from IIIB to IVB in 22.22% cases. 1 case of AA showed focal lymphoid aggregate which later evolved into acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). BMTB is a safe procedure and increased bleeding was noted only in a case of polycythaemia vera. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/jdmc.v22i2.21544 J Dhaka Medical College, Vol. 22, No.2, October, 2013, Page 207-210


Author(s):  
Dr. Atul C. Mujumdar ◽  
Dr. Akash C Chhabra

Introduction: There are various disorders in formation of blood in body. Bone marrow is one of them which involved variety of hematological and nonhematological disorders. Hematological disorders include myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN), acute leukemia, hemato-lymphoid neoplasm and nutritional deficiency diseases whereas nonhematological disorders include infectious diseases infiltrating the bone marrow such as parasitic infections, tuberculosis and metastatic deposits. Bone marrows present various diseases with various clinical symptoms with the involvement of blood but peripheral blood picture alone does not reflect the nature of disease process. Depending upon the suspected diagnosis from clinical features and peripheral blood examination, that indication for bone marrow examination can be done. Examination of Bone marrow is useful in the diagnosis of both hematological and non-hematological disorders. The most important techniques used for the diagnosis of hematological disorders are trephine biopsy and bone marrow aspiration. For the interpretation of the disorder of bone marrow history, clinical finding, peripheral blood picture and other laboratory findings are required. Usually Bone marrow aspiration (BMA) alone is sufficient for the diagnosis of nutritional anaemias, most of the acute leukaemias and Immune thrombocytopenias. Diagnosis such as Trephine biopsy provides important diagnostic information myelofibrosis, granulomatous disease and bone marrow infiltration. Bone marrow aspiration is useful in making out better individual cell morphology whereas biopsy is useful in bone marrow architectural pattern and distribution. Bone marrow is nor mocellular or hypercellula resulting from ineffective hematopoiesis, increased peripheral destruction and bone marrow invasion. Therefore, bone marrow examination is extremely helpful to identify the cause of pancytopenia. Aim: The main aim of this study is to evaluate the cytological and histological pattern of various hematological disorders in bone marrow aspiration and trephine biopsy respectively. Material and Methods: During the period of 1 year 100 patient with the cases of haematological disorders were included in this study. Routinely stain like Leishman stain is used for bone marrow aspiration. Haematoxylin and eosin stain is also used for trephine biopsy. For all the cases reticulocyte count, peripheral smears, sickling test and complete hemogram were done. Special stains PAS Stain (Periodic acid schiff) was done for all ALL, AML and gauchers disease. In ALL cases Block positivity is shown. In gauchers disease, a gaucher cell shows wrinkled tissue paper appearance with PAS positivity. Reticulin stain was done in myelofibrosis and metastatic deposits. In myelofibrosis, trephine biopsy shows increase in reticulin network with coarse fibrils. Result: In all the cases bone marrow aspiration was done and among them 40 cases trephine biopsy were done. Out of total patients 57 were male and 43 were female.  And the mean age was found as 32.6 years. The findings of the bone marrow were examination. At the time of study period 50% of the study have anemias and they are predominantly megaloblastic followed by aplastic/ hypoplastic anemias. Other three cases include two metastatic deposits and one storage disorder (Gaucher’s Disease). Conclusion: Bone marrow examination is important to diagnosis, prognosis or evaluate therapeutic response for a variety of hematologic and non-hematologic problems. Nowadays, Bone marrow aspiration & bone marrow biopsy are used routinely as diagnostic procedures because it is easier and does not require advance equipments. Therefore both the procedures are complementary to each other which are helpful in further investigation and management. Keywords: Bone marrow aspiration, Trephine biopsy, Pancytopenia, Megaloblastic Anemia


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 38-38
Author(s):  
Chepsy C Philip ◽  
Inderjit Singh ◽  
Rachel Thaper ◽  
Alice David ◽  
Suvir Singh ◽  
...  

Background: Bone Marrow aspiration and Biopsy (BMAB) is perceived by patients as a painful procedure with fearsome complications. Though informed as safe and well tolerated; there is limited data about the complications and degree of pain experienced by patients undergoing BMAB.[1] Further scarce is data from the developing world where procedural fear discourages patients from pursuing treatment and diagnosis.[2] Methods Aims: To estimate the level of pain and frequency of serious adverse eventsexperienced by patients undergoing BMAB at our center. We also attempted to identify factors associated with increased pain perception. Study setting: This study was conducted at a tertiary level teaching hospital, the Christian Medical College & Hospital, Ludhiana. Ethics approval was obtained from the Institutional research committee (CMC/1495). Study period: 01 April 2015 through 30 Nov 2019 Study Design: This is a comparative cross sectional study where comparison of those with relatively more pain to those with less was done to elicit the factors associated with pain perception. Study Population: All consecutive patients who underwent a BMAB and provided informed consent which was taken pre-procedure, were included. We excluded patients who underwent the procedure under general anesthesia. Logistics of the Study: The BMAB was performed variably by Consultant Physicians, Trainee Physicians and Physician Assistants. All patients were pre-medicated with tramadol intravenous pre-procedure, and the preferred approach was from the posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS) in a left lateral decubitus under local anesthesia with lignocain. Patients were sent home or returned to their ward after upto 60 minutes of observation. A serious adverse event was considered as one requiring a prolonged observation beyond routine practice or extending to an admission to manage adverse events following and related to the BMAB. Data sources and variables Information regarding age at diagnosis, address and sex, indication to perform the BMAB, coded as malignant and non-malignant was collected from each patient. Number of prior procedures and details regarding food intake were collected as recalled by the patient. Level of pain was noted soon after the BMAB using a combined Wong-Baker grimace with numeric pain scale by the patient themselves. Statistical Analysis: Descriptive statistics were used to characterize variables. Univariate and Multivariate Logistic Regression were used to identify factors associated with higher pain severity (Score >2). Results: A total of 942 BMAB procedures were performed in this period. Baseline characteristics as tabulated below (Table1). Although the Mean + SD pain score was only 2.7 + 1.39, fourteen patients (1.48%) reported severe pain (>8). The following risk-factors were associated with increased pain on multivariate analysis: those experiencing their first BMAB procedure had very low odds of pain (OR (95 % CI): 0.23 (0.15-0.37)). However, when more than one attempt of biopsy was made, the odds of pain was much higher (OR (95 % CI): 1.62 (1.29-2.05)). Food and drink intake prior to procedure was associated only at the univariate level. Those who did not take any food prior to procedure had very high odds of pain (odds ratio (OR) 1.81 (95 % CI 1.01-3.22)). However, those who took juice had very low odds (OR (95 % CI): 0.619 (0.43-0.90)). Nine (0.95%) serious adverse events were reported. There were no deaths. The major serious adverse event was hemorrhage resulting from pseudo-aneurysm of the posterior iliac artery, which comprised 2 of the 9 serious adverse events. Other serious adverse events included persistent vomiting and severe aching pain in the ipsilateral leg. Conclusions: In our analysis BMAB is associated with a low level of procedural pain and is safe. The pain perception was not influenced by the operator. Factors associated with decreased pain perception were first procedural BMAB experience and successful completion of the procedure in the first attempt. Having at least a snack or a juice pre-procedure could reduce pain perception. Serious adverse events are rare in our experience. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document