scholarly journals Emotional Threat Perception and Its Association with Neurocognition in Social Anxiety Disorder

2021 ◽  
pp. 025371762110464
Author(s):  
Anjali Thomas Mathai ◽  
Shweta Rai ◽  
Rishikesh V. Behere

Background: The negative appraisal of emotional stimuli is a feature of social anxiety disorder (SAD). People with SAD demonstrate deficits in neurocognitive performance while performing tasks of attention. However, the relationship between attentional control, working memory, and threat perception in SAD has not been studied well. The present study aimed to identify patterns of threat perception in relation to performance on attention and visuospatial working memory tasks in individuals with SAD. Methods: Subjects with SAD ( n = 27) and a healthy comparative (HC) group ( n = 26) completed tasks of sustained and focused attention, visuospatial working memory, computerized emotion identification, and pictorial emotional Stroop. Results: The SAD group had decreased performance in the domains of sustained (P = 0.001) and focused attention (P = 0.04). They also had an enhanced threat perception as demonstrated by greater reaction time to anger (P = 0.03), lower emotion recognition accuracy (P = 0.05), and higher over-identification of the threat to neutral and nonthreatening faces. However, the Stroop effect was not demonstrated across the groups. No group difference was seen in the performance on the visuospatial working memory tasks. Lower focused attention was significantly correlated with higher emotional threat perception (ETP; P = 0.001) in the SAD group. Conclusion: People with SAD have greater deficits in attention processing and ETP. The attention deficits were associated with enhanced ETP in social anxiety. The link between threat perception and cognitive functions would aid in a better understanding of SAD and in planning appropriate intervention.

2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (8) ◽  
pp. 1733-1740 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Lira Yoon ◽  
Amanda M. Kutz ◽  
Joelle LeMoult ◽  
Jutta Joormann

2018 ◽  
Vol 127 (3) ◽  
pp. 276-281 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie Waechter ◽  
David A. Moscovitch ◽  
Vanja Vidovic ◽  
Tatiana Bielak ◽  
Karen Rowa ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nozomi Tomita ◽  
Minamide Ayumi ◽  
Hiroaki Kumano

<p>Social anxiety disorder has two critical attentional processes, self-focused attention (SFA) and other-focused attention (OFA). These biases are caused by two psychological aspects: Strategies known as positive metacognitive beliefs and negative metacognitive beliefs. A method in which the occurrence of OFA is predicted by eye movement has been proposed. However, few studies have investigated the relationship between SFA and changes of eye movement. We investigated the relationship between the degree of SFA and OFA during speech and eye movements based on psychogenic correlation that psychological changes reflect eye movements in this study.<b></b></p><p></p>


2019 ◽  
Vol 126 (6) ◽  
pp. 1101-1116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nozomi Tomita ◽  
Shoji Imai ◽  
Yusuke Kanayama ◽  
Hiroaki Kumano

Social anxiety disorder is characterized by a marked fear and avoidance of social situations or a fear of being evaluated by others. Although training for top-down attentional control has been an effective treatment for social anxiety disorder, few studies have demonstrated that individuals with social anxiety have top-down attentional dysfunction. This study used dichotic listening (DL) tasks to investigate the relationship between social anxiety and top-down attentional control over relevant brain activities. We also investigated relationships between both social situation-dependent self-focused attention and external attention bias and situation-independent attentional control. Thirty-six healthy participants underwent near-infrared spectroscopy scanning while performing top-down selective and divided attention DL tasks. Then, they undertook a speech task and completed a questionnaire to assess the degrees of their self-focused attention and external attention bias. The results showed that the degree of social fear and self-focused attention during the speech task were negatively correlated with scores on the selective attention task and with the activity of the left pars opercularis during the selective DL task, which were related to each other. These results suggest that a relationship exists between social fear, self-focused attention in a social situation, and top-down selective attentional dysfunction as assessed both behaviorally and by brain activity changes.


Author(s):  
Ana Isabel Rosa-Alcázar ◽  
Ángel Rosa-Alcázar ◽  
Inmaculada C. Martínez-Esparza ◽  
Eric A. Storch ◽  
Pablo J. Olivares-Olivares

This study analyzed response inhibition, cognitive flexibility and working memory in three groups of patients diagnosed with obsessive-compulsive disorder, social anxiety disorder and generalized anxiety disorder, considering some variables that may influence results (nonverbal reasoning, comorbidity, use of pharmacotherapy). Neuropsychological measures were completed using a computerized Wisconsin card sorting test, Stroop color word test, go/no-go task, digits and Corsi. Significant differences were obtained among groups in cognitive flexibility and working memory variables. The obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) group showed the worst results. The social anxiety disorder group obtained greater effect sizes in visuospatial memory. However, significant differences between groups in visuospatial memory were no longer present when nonverbal reasoning was controlled. Comorbidity influenced interference in the OCD and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) groups. In addition, the executive functions were differently influenced by the level of obsessions and anxiety, and the use of pharmacotherapy. Study limitations include a non-random selection of participants, modest sample size and design type (cross-sectional). The OCD group showed the worst results in flexibility cognitive and verbal working memory. Comorbidity, use of pharmacotherapy and level anxiety and obsessions were variables influencing the performance of executive functions.


2017 ◽  
Vol 92 ◽  
pp. 77-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noortje Vriends ◽  
Yasemin Meral ◽  
Javier A. Bargas-Avila ◽  
Christina Stadler ◽  
Susan M. Bögels

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document