‘Human-on-a-chip’ Developments: A Translational Cutting-edge Alternative to Systemic Safety Assessment and Efficiency Evaluation of Substances in Laboratory Animals and Man?

2012 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. 235-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Uwe Marx ◽  
Heike Walles ◽  
Silke Hoffmann ◽  
Gerd Lindner ◽  
Reyk Horland ◽  
...  
1994 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 581-597 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jon M. Battershill

1 The methods used to evaluate the toxicological effects of PCBs in animals have been reviewed. 2 The data show that Toxic Equivalency Factors (TEFs) could be developed to assess the potential toxicity of PCB mixtures for certain specific target organ effects (such as the liver and immune system) but would be inappropriate for other effects (e.g. thyroid function and neurochemical effects). More data on a wider range of individual PCB congeners and a method for systematically balancing toxicodynamic and toxicokinetic data are required before the TEF approach can be fully evaluated. 3 With the exception of the teratogenic effects seen in mice and the anti-oestrogenic effects reported in in vitro studies, there are insufficient data on individual PCB congeners to evaluate the structure-activity relationships for the effects of PCBs on reproduction. The data also show that individual PCBs may have opposing effects on a particular aspect of reproduction (for example individual PCB congeners may have either oestrogenic or anti-oestrogenic effects). Studies with individual PCB congeners have shown both enhancement and antagonism of the teratogenic effects of 2,3,7,8-tetrachloro dibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) in the mouse. It is not possible to use TEFs to evaluate the reproductive effects of PCBs. 4 The mechanism(s) responsible for the effects of PCBs on postnatal neurobehavioural development in rodents and monkeys have not been elucidated. At least two groups of PCBs which might be responsible for the observed effects have been identified in this review, one affecting the dopaminergic system and the other group affecting thyroid hormone levels. Considerably more research would be required before the TEF approach could be applied to the effects of PCBs on postnatal neurobehavioural development. This would include research on an appropriate animal model to determine whether the critical toxicological mechanism is mediated through the Ah receptor. 5 The reproductive toxicity of complex PCB mixtures such as those found in foods will depend on the identities and relative proportions of individual PCB congeners in the mixture. It is not possible to give an accurate estimate of a NOAEL or LOAEL from the reproduction studies using commercial PCB mixtures which could be readily applied to the safety assessment of PCBs present as contaminants in food. 6 It is concluded that the data presented in this paper support the hypothesis that there is no satisfactory method derived from the available studies in laboratory animals for evaluating the potential risk of adverse effects on reproduction posed by contamination of foods with PCBs.


1987 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 121-138 ◽  

Sodium Sesquicarbonate, Sodium Carbonate, and Sodium Bicarbonate are used in cosmetic products at concentrations ranging up to 50%. The LD50 in rats for Sodium Bicarbonate ranged from 7.6 g/kg to 8.9 g/kg. Sodium Sesquicarbonate, Sodium Carbonate, and Sodium Bicarbonate caused conjunctivitis. Sodium Bicarbonate was not an ocular irritant to laboratory animals. Neither Sodium Bicarbonate nor Sodium Carbonate was a teratogen to laboratory animals. Sodium Sesquicarbonate and Sodium Bicarbonate were not mutagenic to two different cell cultures. Dermatitis, but not sensitization, was observed in employees of a Trona (Sodium Sesquicarbonate) mining facility. Sodium Carbonate, but not Sodium Bicarbonate, is a skin and eye irritant due to the alkaline nature of its solutions, The cosmetic use of Sodium Carbonate at high concentrations is mainly limited to products designed to be diluted before use and in products where pH is buffered to near neutrality. It is concluded that Sodium Sesquicarbonate, Sodium Bicarbonate, and Sodium Carbonate are safe as presently used in cosmetics.


ILAR Journal ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 59 (2) ◽  
pp. 127-133
Author(s):  
James R Swearengen

Abstract The 8th edition of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (Guide) is clear in its requirement for each institution to establish and maintain an occupational health and safety (OHS) program as an essential part of the overall program of animal care and use. For over 30 years, AAALAC International has utilized a variety of methods to evaluate this component of OHS programs as part of the accreditation process. AAALAC International began collecting data on site visit findings over 20 years ago using the Guide as a template for establishing the categories and subcategories to which findings are assigned. Data from 1656 findings associated with OHS were identified during calendar years 2014 through 2016. This information was used to provide an overview of the most frequently observed OHS findings that occurred during this time span. The 5 categories representing key OHS areas and the combined percentage of both mandatory findings and suggestions for improvement in each category included: workplace risk/safety assessment (37.3%); personnel protection (36.3%); personnel risk assessment (14.4%); hazard containment (9.4%); and medical services (2.6%). Information on the most commonly observed OHS findings and associated trends may be helpful to animal care and use programs when conducting internal reviews of their own OHS programs.


2017 ◽  
Vol 280 ◽  
pp. S283-S284
Author(s):  
Dragana Mitic Potkrajac ◽  
Tamara Krsmanovic ◽  
Katica Jankovic ◽  
Gordana Apic ◽  
Robert B. Russell

1990 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  

Glycol Stearate, Glycol Stearate SE, and Glycol Distearate consist primarily of the mono- and diesters of triple-pressed stearic acid. They are used in numerous categories of cosmetic products at concentrations ranging from less than 0.1 to 10%. Animal data for acute oral toxicity, skin and eye irritation, and sensitization show that these ingredients have low acute toxicity. A repeated insult patch test with 50% Glycol Distearate on 125 subjects presented no evidence of skin irritation or hypersensitivity. Human studies using formulations containing Glycol Stearate at levels of 2-5% reported no skin irritation or sensitization. Subchronic testing has not been adequately investigated in laboratory animals. Human test data for formulations containing > 4% Glycol Stearate or Glycol Distearate should be considered. Based on the available information presented herein, it is concluded that Glycol Stearate, Glycol Stearate SE, and Glycol Distearate are safe as cosmetic ingredients in the present practices of use and concentration.


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (17) ◽  
pp. 19-32
Author(s):  
H. Naef ◽  
◽  
L. V. Cheskidova ◽  
G. N. Bliznetsova ◽  
T. E. Lobodina ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 26 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 113-124

HC Yellow No. 5 is a direct hair dye. Hair dyes containing HC Yellow No. 5, as “coal tar” hair dye products, are exempt from the principal adulteration provision and from the color additive provision of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act of 1938 when the label bears a caution statement and “patch test” instructions for determining whether the product causes skin irritation. Preliminary testing on or by individuals should be done using an open patch test that is evaluated at 48 h after application of the test material. Users, therefore, would be able to determine their individual reactions to hair dye products containing HC Yellow No. 5. Absorption of HC Yellow No. 5 is minimal through skin ( < 0.2%). The oral LD50 for rats is 555.56 mg/kg. No significant toxic effects were observed after chronic oral exposure of HD Yellow No. 5 to dogs. Mild dermal irritation, but no dermal sensitization or ocular irritation was observed in laboratory animals. Results of fertility and reproductive performance, teratology, and developmental studies were negative. HC Yellow No. 5 was found to be nonmutagenic and noncytotoxic in standard laboratory assays. A current review of the hair dye epidemiology literature identified that use of direct hair dyes, although not the focus in all investigations, appears to have little evidence of an association with cancer or other adverse events. Based on the available safety test data on HC Yellow No. 5, the Panel determined that this ingredient likely would not have carcinogenic potential as used in hair dyes. The Cosmetic Ingredient Review (CIR) Expert Panel concluded that HC Yellow No. 5 is safe as a hair dye ingredient in the practices of use and concentration as described in this safety assessment.


1986 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 1-59 ◽  

Hydroxyethylcellulose, Hydroxypropylcellulose, Methylcellulose, Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose, and Cellulose Gum are modified cellulose polymers that are used in cosmetic products at concentrations up to 10%. The cellulose derivatives pass essentially unchanged through the gastrointestinal tract following oral administration. They are practically nontoxic when administered by inhalation or by oral, intraperitoneal, subcutaneous, or dermal routes. Subchronic and chronic oral studies indicate that the cellulose derivatives are nontoxic when administered to laboratory animals. No significant teratogenic or reproductive effects have been demonstrated. Ocular and dermal irritation studies show that the cellulose derivatives are, at most, minimally irritating to rabbit eyes and nonirritating to slightly irritating to rabbit skin when tested at concentrations up to 100%. No mutagenic activity of theseingredients was demonstrated. The cellulose derivatives at concentrations up to 100% were nonirritating to mildly irritating, nonsensitizing, and nonphotosensitizing when evaluated in clinical studies. It is concluded that theingredients reviewed are safe as cosmeticingredients in the present practices of use and concentration.


2020 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. 00086
Author(s):  
Aliya Kashaeva ◽  
Shamil Shakirov ◽  
Firaya Akhmetzyanova ◽  
Damir Khairullin

Development of inexpensive and environmentally friendly feed additives based on waste from the food industry and expired products as energy sources for animals is of current relevance and high demand. The study aimed to test the toxicological safety of ZeolFat energy feed additive (EFA) on laboratory animals. The tests on white rats showed that ZeolFat EFA is a low-toxic feed product with no cumulative properties revealed. The animals exhibited satisfactory physical state and a good appetite during experimental feeding. They were active, and their response to external stimuli remained similar to that before EFA introduction. ZeolFat EFA had a stimulating effect on carbohydrate and lipid, and mineral metabolism in rats, thereby ensuring a high increase in their live weight.


1986 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 103-121

In cosmetic products, Coconut Oil is used as a cleanser, foaming agent, or stabilizer at concentrations up to 50%. Acute, chronic, and subchronic oral toxicity studies indicate that Coconut Oil and Hydrogenated Coconut Oil are relatively nontoxic byingestion. Neither compound produced significant skin or eye irritation in laboratory animals. No sensitization was reported. Clinical assessment of cosmetic products containing Coconut Oil produced very minimal skin irritation reactions. There was no indication that theseingredients were primary irritants, sensitizers, or phototoxic compounds following human testing. It is concluded that Coconut Oil, Coconut Acid, Hydrogenated Coconut Oil, and Hydrogenated Coconut Acid are safe for use as cosmeticingredients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document