The impact of public health palliative care interventions on health system outcomes: A systematic review

2020 ◽  
pp. 026921632098172
Author(s):  
Anna Collins ◽  
Julia E. H. Brown ◽  
Jason Mills ◽  
Jennifer Philip
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Health System ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Service Use ◽  
Synthesis Method ◽  
Life Care ◽  
The Impact

Background: Public health palliative care interventions are increasingly implemented, with growing recognition of the importance of building evidence to support their utility in end-of-life care. Previous efforts have focused on community outcomes. Aim: To examine the impact of public health palliative care on patterns of health service use at the end of life (primary) and explore which outcomes are being measured within this field of research (secondary). Design: Systematic review of studies reporting qualitative and quantitative data, analysed with a narrative synthesis method. Data sources: A systematic review conducted and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses guideline was undertaken using six electronic databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO, INFORMIT and COCHRANE) up to February 2020. Results: Searches yielded 2622 unique titles screened for eligibility, resulting in 35 studies measuring outcomes from a public health palliative care approach. Five (14%) studies assessed health system outcomes, and three reported some mixed evidence of impact, including reduced hospital emergency admissions, hospital bed days, hospital costs and increased home deaths. Most studies (86%) instead reported on conceptual (49%), knowledge (40%), programme participation (37%) and/or individual health outcomes (29%). Conclusion: The impact of public health palliative care is an evolving area of empirical inquiry with currently only limited evidence that it improves healthcare utilisation outcomes at the end of life, and limited focus on measurement of these outcomes. Further empirical studies are needed to support the reorientation of health services, which remains an important component in realising ‘whole of system change’ to bring about quality end-of-life care for all.

Does post-registration palliative care education for nurses improve practice? A systematic review

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (11) ◽  
pp. 552-564 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Thavaraj ◽  
Karen Gillett
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Quantitative Data ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Care Education ◽  
Palliative Care Education ◽  
The Impact

Aims: We aimed to answer the question: what is the evidence that post-registration palliative care education for nurses improves practice? Background: The 2008 End of Life Care Strategy emphasised the need for a workforce equipped to provide high-quality end-of-life care for patients and their families. As registered nurses are the healthcare professionals spending most time with patients and families at the end of life, associated policy documents stress the importance of educating nurses to equip them with the necessary knowledge and skills to provide effective care. Despite education being a consistent recommendation, the ability of education to influence nursing practice is uncertain. Methods: We undertook a systematic review of literature using Joanna Briggs Institute Methodology for Mixed Methods by searching the Medline, Embase and CINAHL databases between January 2006 and December 2018. Findings: Ten studies met the inclusion criteria, seven contained quantitative data. Six demonstrated improvements in outcome measures, but not all results were statistically significant. Most quantitative data related to self-reported measures of confidence. Six studies contained qualitative findings that were categorised into themes: confidence, practice change, skills and proactivity. Conclusion: Little research exists exploring the impact of post-registration palliative care education for nurses. Existing outcome measures do not clearly demonstrate changes to end-of-life practice. Research is suggested to establish links between self-reported confidence and improvements to practice. Evaluation of the impact on practice should be an integral component of end-of-life education initiatives.

The impact of a new public health approach to end-of-life care: A systematic review

2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 200-211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Libby Sallnow ◽  
Heather Richardson ◽  
Scott A Murray ◽  
Allan Kellehear
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Public Health Approach ◽  
Life Care ◽  
New Public Health ◽  
New Public ◽  
The Impact

scholarly journals The public health end-of-life care movement: history, principles, and styles of practice

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aliki Karapliagou ◽  
Allan Kellehear ◽  
Klaus Wegleitner
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Psychosocial Care ◽  
Care Practice ◽  
Life Care ◽  
The Public ◽  
Civic Practice ◽  
Practice Methods

This chapter briefly outlines the history, key concepts, and main practice methods from public health approaches to end-of-life care. Although linked to psychosocial care approaches, its main methods draw not from psychology or health services inspired approaches but rather from health promotion, community development, and civic engagement. Key methods covered include community volunteering, social networking, community engagement, and compassionate communities and cities. The aim of these kinds of approaches is to embed palliative care practice as a social and civic practice in all sectors of society and to ensure that palliative care as a policy is represented in all civic policies (e.g. schools, workplaces, faith groups, and cultural activities) and not solely in health care.

First steps: Health and social care professionals beginning to address the palliative and end of life care needs of people with diverse gender identities and sexual orientations in Lebanon

Sexualities ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 136346072093238
Author(s):  
Claude Chidiac
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Social Stigma ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Care Needs ◽  
Mena Region ◽  
Healthcare Needs ◽  
Health And Social Care ◽  
The Impact

The available evidence demonstrates that lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people face challenges when accessing palliative care services, and receive suboptimal care at the end of life. This is mainly attributed to assumed heterosexuality, lack of knowledge and understanding of LGBT issues and specific healthcare needs, discrimination, homophobia, and transphobia. In Lebanon, legal and institutional support for LGBT individuals is minimal, and palliative care provision remains scarce and fragmented. This compounds the impact of social stigma and marginalisation, and results in unrecognised palliative and end of life care needs for the LGBT individual. This short commentary discusses the development of an LGBT palliative care workshop in Lebanon, which was the first initiative of its kind in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. It also explores how this initiative has led to further developments, and how these efforts can be replicated in other countries in the MENA region.

Palliative care for community patients diagnosed with dementia: a systematic review

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (12) ◽  
pp. 570-575
Author(s):  
Cathryn Smith ◽  
Gina Newbury
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Good Practice ◽  
Community Setting ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Staff Support ◽  
The Uk

Despite many efforts made by health organisations to deliver effective end-of-life care to patients with dementia, research indicates that palliative care is predominantly aimed at patients with terminal cancer, and that patients with dementia face challenges in accessing end-of-life care. This article explores the views of health professionals on providing palliative care to those patients diagnosed with dementia within the community setting. A systematic review of seven qualitative studies was performed to identify the best available evidence. The findings show that effective palliative care for patients with dementia continues being affected by many barriers and challenges. Good practice seems to be inconsistent and fragmented throughout the UK and European countries, and many health professionals are faced with difficulties associated with services and financial implications, training and education, staff support, communication, family support and dementia care.

scholarly journals Palliative care for people with dementia living at home: A systematic review of interventions

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (7) ◽  
pp. 726-742 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rose Miranda ◽  
Frances Bunn ◽  
Jennifer Lynch ◽  
Lieve Van den Block ◽  
Claire Goodman
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
European Association ◽  
Life Care ◽  
High Quality ◽  
People With Dementia ◽  
Care Outcomes ◽  
Facilitators And Barriers

Background: The European Association for Palliative Care White Paper defined optimal palliative care in dementia based on evidence and expert consensus. Yet, we know little on how to achieve this for people with dementia living and dying at home. Aims: To examine evidence on home palliative care interventions in dementia, in terms of their effectiveness on end-of-life care outcomes, factors influencing implementation, the extent to which they address the European Association for Palliative Care palliative care domains and evidence gaps. Design: A systematic review of home palliative care interventions in dementia. Data sources: The review adhered to the PRISMA guidelines and the protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42018093607). We searched four electronic databases up to April 2018 (PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane library and CINAHL) and conducted lateral searches. Results: We retrieved eight relevant studies, none of which was of high quality. The evidence, albeit of generally weak quality, showed the potential benefits of the interventions in improving end-of-life care outcomes, for example, behavioural disturbances. The interventions most commonly focused on optimal symptom management, continuity of care and psychosocial support. Other European Association for Palliative Care domains identified as important in palliative care for people with dementia, for example, prognostication of dying or avoidance of burdensome interventions were under-reported. No direct evidence on facilitators and barriers to implementation was found. Conclusions: The review highlights the paucity of high-quality dementia-specific research in this area and recommends key areas for future work, for example, the need for process evaluation to identify facilitators and barriers to implementing interventions.

Palliative Sedation in End-of-Life Care and Survival: A Systematic Review

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (12) ◽  
pp. 1378-1383 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Maltoni ◽  
Emanuela Scarpi ◽  
Marta Rosati ◽  
Stefania Derni ◽  
Laura Fabbri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Palliative Sedation ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Review Of Literature ◽  
Refractory Symptoms ◽  
Manual Search

Purpose Palliative sedation is a clinical procedure aimed at relieving refractory symptoms in patients with advanced cancer. It has been suggested that sedative drugs may shorten life, but few studies exist comparing the survival of sedated and nonsedated patients. We present a systematic review of literature on the clinical practice of palliative sedation to assess the effect, if any, on survival. Methods A systematic review of literature published between January 1980 and December 2010 was performed using MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. Search terms included palliative sedation, terminal sedation, refractory symptoms, cancer, neoplasm, palliative care, terminally ill, end-of-life care, and survival. A manual search of the bibliographies of electronically identified articles was also performed. Results Eleven published articles were identified describing 1,807 consecutive patients in 10 retrospective or prospective nonrandomized studies, 621 (34.4%) of whom were sedated. One case-control study was excluded from prevalence analysis. The most frequent reason for sedation was delirium in the terminal stages of illness (median, 57.1%; range, 13.8% to 91.3%). Benzodiazepines were the most common drug category prescribed. Comparing survival of sedated and nonsedated patients, the sedation approach was not shown to be associated with worse survival. Conclusion Even if there is no direct evidence from randomized clinical trials, palliative sedation, when appropriately indicated and correctly used to relieve unbearable suffering, does not seem to have any detrimental effect on survival of patients with terminal cancer. In this setting, palliative sedation is a medical intervention that must be considered as part of a continuum of palliative care.

The impact of a one month palliative care rotation on medical residents working in a tertiary cancer center in Jordan.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (29_suppl) ◽  
pp. 168-168
Author(s):  
Omar M. Shamieh ◽  
Alia Alawneh ◽  
Wafa Ahamd ◽  
Sewar S Salmany ◽  
Barakat Altamimi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
The United States ◽  
Medical Residents ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Clinical Rotation ◽  
Life Care ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Tertiary Cancer Center

168 Background: Palliative care education and training remains inadequate for medical professionals especially in developing countries. We evaluated the impact of a one month palliative care clinical rotation on medical residents’ attitude, competency, and knowledge related to palliative care in a tertiary cancer center in Jordan. Methods: All transitional Internal Medicine residents rotated in a monthly palliative care rotation at King Hussein Cancer Center (KHCC), in Amman, Jordan, were requested to participate in this educational intervention study. A concise curriculum in palliative and end of life care, adapted from the Education for Physicians on End-Of-Life Care (EPEC) Curriculum and delivered by our faculty was piloted as a part of the clinical rotation. Residents spent one month in the inpatient palliative care unit, in addition to 10 hours of classroom interactive sessions. The curriculum comprised of five modules: 1- Principles of palliative care, 2- Pain management, 3- Management of distressing symptoms, 4- Communication skills, 5- End-of- life care. To assess our educational outcomes, we adapted a previously developed instruments by David Weisman and used by the National Residency Education in the United States. All Instruments were completed by each resident before and after the rotation, and included self-assessment of attitude, competency and a knowledge test comprising of 32-items of multiple choice questions. Results: Twenty of 27 (74%) residents who started the palliative care rotation completed the required education and had paired evaluations. There was improvement in all three instruments: 37% improvement in competence (p < 0.0001), 17% Improvement in knowledge (p = 0.015), and 5% improvement in attitude (p = 0.02). Conclusions: The one-month mandatory rotation improved knowledge, attitude and competence related to palliative care for medical residents.

scholarly journals Prevalence and characteristics of prisoners requiring end-of-life care: A prospective national survey

2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lionel Pazart ◽  
Aurélie Godard-Marceau ◽  
Aline Chassagne ◽  
Aurore Vivot-Pugin ◽  
Elodie Cretin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
General Population ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
National Survey ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Terminal Illness ◽  
Prison Population ◽  
Critical Issue ◽  
Life Care ◽  
The Impact

Background: Ensuring adequate end-of-life care for prisoners is a critical issue. In France, data investigating the impact of laws allowing release of seriously ill prisoners are lacking. Aim: To assess the number and characteristics of prisoners requiring palliative care in French prisons. Design: A prospective, national survey collecting data over a 3-month period. Setting/participants: All healthcare units ( n = 190) providing care for prisoners in France. The prison population was 66,698 during the study period. Data collection concerned prisoners requiring end-of-life care, that is, with serious, advanced, progressive, or terminal illness and life expectancy <1 year. Results: Estimated annual prevalence of ill prisoners requiring end-of-life care was 15.2 (confidence interval: 12.5–18.3) per 10,000 prisoners. The observed number of prisoners requiring palliative care ( n = 50) was twice as high as the expected age- and sex-standardized number based on the general population and similar to the expected number among persons 10 years older in the free community. In all, 41 of 44 (93%) of identified ill prisoners were eligible for temporary or permanent compassionate release, according to their practitioner. Only 33 of 48 (68%) of ill prisoners requested suspension or reduction in their sentence on medical grounds; half (16/33) received a positive answer. Conclusion: The proportion of prisoners requiring palliative care is higher than expected in the general population. The general frailty and co-existing conditions of prisoners before incarceration and the acceleration of these phenomena in prison could explain this increase in end-of-life situations among prisoners.

Outpatient Palliative Care and Aggressiveness of End-of-Life Care in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 166-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Si Won Lee ◽  
Hyun Jung Jho ◽  
Ji Yeon Baek ◽  
Eun Kyung Shim ◽  
Hyun Mi Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Hospice Care ◽  
Emergency Department Visits ◽  
Life Care ◽  
The Impact

Background: Palliative care in outpatient setting has been shown to promote better symptom management and transition to hospice care among patients with advanced cancer. Nevertheless, specialized palliative care is rarely provided at cancer centers in Korea. Herein, we aimed to assess aggressiveness of end-of-life care for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer according to the use of outpatient palliative care (OPC) at a single cancer center in Korea. Methods: We performed a retrospective medical record review for 132 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who died between 2011 and 2014. Fifty patients used OPC (OPC group), while 82 patients did not (non-OPC group). Indicators of aggressiveness of end-of-life care including chemotherapy use, emergency department visits, hospitalization, and utilization of hospice care were analyzed according to the use of OPC. Results: More patients in the OPC group were admitted to hospice than those in the non-OPC group (32% vs 17%, P = .047). The mean of inpatient days within 30 days of death was shorter for the OPC group than the non-OPC group (4.02 days vs 7.77 days, respectively, P = .032). There were no differences in the proportions of patients who received chemotherapy and visited the emergency department within 30 days from death. Conclusion: Among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, OPC was associated with shorter inpatient days near death and greater hospice utilization. Further prospective studies are needed to evaluate the impact of OPC on end-of-life care in Korea.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document