Impact of prior mammograms on combined reading of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis

2016 ◽  
Vol 58 (2) ◽  
pp. 148-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Won Hwa Kim ◽  
Jung Min Chang ◽  
Hye Ryoung Koo ◽  
Mirinae Seo ◽  
Min Sun Bae ◽  
...  

Background Although digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) is an emerging technique yielding higher sensitivity and specificity compared to digital mammography (DM) alone, relative contribution of prior mammograms on the interpretation of DBT combined with DM has not been investigated. Purpose To retrospectively compare the diagnostic performances of DM, DM + DBT, and DM + DBT with prior mammograms. Material and Methods Three breast radiologists independently reviewed images of 116 patients with 24 cancers in the sequential order of DM, DM + DBT, and DM + DBT with prior mammograms using Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) assessment categories. Results The average areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of DM, DM + DBT, and DM + DBT with prior mammograms were 0.712, 0.777, and 0.816, respectively. Adding prior mammograms did not significantly affect the AUC of DM + DBT ( P = 0.108), whereas adding DBT significantly increased the AUC of DM ( P = 0.009). Sensitivity for DM, DM + DBT, and DM + DBT with prior mammograms was 58.3%, 69.4%, and 69.4%, and specificities were 84.1%, 85.9%, and 93.8%, respectively. Addition of DBT significantly increased the sensitivity ( P = 0.0090) of DM. Prior mammograms significantly improved the specificity of DM + DBT ( P = 0.0004), whereas adding prior mammogram did not affect sensitivity of DM + DBT ( P = 1.000). Conclusion DBT significantly increases the overall sensitivity and diagnostic performance of DM. Prior mammograms significantly increase the specificity of DM + DBT but have no significant effect on sensitivity and overall diagnostic performance.

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akram M. Asbeutah ◽  
Nouralhuda Karmani ◽  
AbdulAziz A. Asbeutah ◽  
Yasmin A. Echreshzadeh ◽  
Abdullah A. AlMajran ◽  
...  

Objective: To investigate the sensitivity and specificity of digital mammography (DM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) for the detection of breast cancer in comparison to histopathology findings. Subjects and Methods: We included 65 breast lesions in 58 women, each detected by two diagnostic mammography techniques – DM and DBT using Senographe Essential (GE Healthcare, Buc, France) – and subsequently confirmed by histopathology. The Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System was used for characterizing the lesions. Results: The average age of women was 48.3 years (range 26–81 years). There were 34 malignant and 31 benign breast lesions. The sensitivity of DM and DBT was 73.5 and 100%, respectively, while the specificity was 67.7 and 94%, respectively. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed an overall diagnostic advantage of DBT over DM, with a significant difference between DBT and DM (p < 0.001). By performing Cohen’s kappa test, we found that there was a strong level of agreement according to Altman guidelines between DBT and histopathology findings (0.97), but a weak agreement between DM and histopathology findings (0.47). Conclusion: DBT improves the clinical accuracy of mammography by increasing both sensitivity and specificity. We believe that this improvement is due to improved image visibility and quality. These results could be of interest to health care institutions as they may impact their decision on whether to upgrade to DBT not only for diagnosis, but also for screening.


Author(s):  
Paola Clauser ◽  
Pascal A. T. Baltzer ◽  
Panagiotis Kapetas ◽  
Ramona Woitek ◽  
Michael Weber ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives To evaluate the diagnostic performance in the assessment setting of three protocols: one-view wide-angle digital breast tomosynthesis (WA-DBT) with synthetic mammography (SM), two-view WA-DBT/SM, and two-view digital mammography (DM). Methods Included in this retrospective study were patients who underwent bilateral two-view DM and WA-DBT. SM were reconstructed from the WA-DBT data. The standard of reference was histology and/or 2 years follow-up. Included were 205 women with 179 lesions (89 malignant, 90 benign). Four blinded readers randomly evaluated images to assess density, lesion type, and level of suspicion according to BI-RADS. Three protocols were evaluated: two-view DM, one-view (mediolateral oblique) WA-DBT/SM, and two-view WA-DBT/SM. Detection rate, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated and compared using multivariate analysis. Reading time was assessed. Results The detection rate was higher with two-view WA-DBT/SM (p = 0.063). Sensitivity was higher for two-view WA-DBT/SM compared to two-view DM (p = 0.001) and one-view WA-DBT/SM (p = 0.058). No significant differences in specificity were found. Accuracy was higher with both one-view WA-DBT/SM and two-view WA-DBT/SM compared to DM (p = 0.003 and > 0.001, respectively). Accuracy did not differ between one- and two-view WA-DBT/SM. Two-view WA-DBT/SM performed better for masses and asymmetries. Reading times were significantly longer when WA-DBT was evaluated. Conclusions One-view and two-view WA-DBT/SM can achieve a higher diagnostic performance compared to two-view DM. The detection rate and sensitivity were highest with two-view WA-DBT/SM. Two-view WA-DBT/SM appears to be the most appropriate tool for the assessment of breast lesions. Key Points • Detection rate with two-view wide-angle digital breast tomosynthesis (WA-DBT) is significantly higher than with two-view digital mammography in the assessment setting. • Diagnostic accuracy of one-view and two-view WA-DBT with synthetic mammography (SM) in the assessment setting is higher than that of two-view digital mammography. • Compared to one-view WA-DBT with SM, two-view WA-DBT with SM seems to be the most appropriate tool for the assessment of breast lesions.


2019 ◽  
Vol 85 (8) ◽  
pp. 855-857
Author(s):  
Anthony M. Scott ◽  
Madison G. Lashley ◽  
Nicholas B. Drury ◽  
Paul S. Dale

The effect of mammographic screening on the natural history and evolution of breast cancer treatment cannot be overstated; however, despite intensive and resource consuming screening, advanced breast cancer is still diagnosed frequently. The development of three-dimensional mammography or digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) has already demonstrated greater sensitivity in the diagnosis of breast pathology and effectiveness in identifying early breast cancers. In addition to being a more sensitive screening tool, other studies indicate DBT has a lower call-back rate when compared with traditional DM. This study compares call-back rates between these two screening tools. A single institution, retrospective review was conducted of almost 20,000 patient records who underwent digital mammography or DBTin the years 2016 to 2018. These charts were analyzed for documentation of imaging type, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System 0 status, call-back status, and type of further imaging that was required. Charts for 19,863 patients were reviewed, 17,899 digital mammography examinations were conducted compared with 11,331 DBT examinations resulting in 1,066 and 689 Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System 0 studies, respectively. Of the DM call-backs, 82.08 per cent were recommended for additional radiographic imaging and 17.82 per cent for ultrasound imaging. In the DBT group, only 39.77 per cent of callbacks were recommended for additional radiographic imaging and 60.09 per cent for ultrasound imaging. Our data suggest that DBT results in less call-back for additional mammographic images as compared with digital mammography. DBT may offer benefits over DM, including less imaging before biopsy, less time before biopsy, quicker diagnosis, and improved patient satisfaction.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document