Anatomical and radiologic characteristics of isthmus parameters in guiding pedicle screw placement

Objective To study the clinical application of lumbar isthmus parameters in guiding pedicle screw placement. Methods Lumbar isthmus parameters were measured in normal lumbar x-rays and cadaveric specimens from a Chinese Han population. Distance between the medial pedicle border and lateral isthmus border was recorded as a ‘D’ value and was compared between X-rays and cadavers. Orthopaedic surgeons estimated different distances (2–6 mm) and angles (5–20°), and bias ratios between estimated and real values were compared. Orthopaedic residents placed pedicle screws on cadaveric specimens before and after application of the ‘D’ value, and screw placement accuracy was compared. Results Except for L4 vertebrae, significant differences in the ‘D’ value were found between 25 cadaveric specimens and x-ray films from 120 patients. Distances and angles estimated by 40 surgeons were significantly different from all real values, except 2 mm distance. Accuracy of pedicle screw placement by six orthopaedic residents was significantly improved by applying the ‘D’ value. Conclusions Surgeon estimates of distance were more accurate than angle estimates. Addition of a ‘D’ value to conventional parameters may significantly improve pedicle screw placement accuracy in lumbar spine surgery.

Download Full-text

Postoperative Assessment of Pedicle Screws and Management of Breaches: A Survey among Canadian Spine Surgeons and a New Scoring System

Asian Spine Journal ◽

10.4184/asj.2018.12.1.37 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 12 (1) ◽

pp. 37-46 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Ahmed Aoude ◽

Saber Ghadakzadeh ◽

Hamzah Alhamzah ◽

Maryse Fortin ◽

Peter Jarzem ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Pedicle Screw ◽

Scoring System ◽

Accuracy Assessment ◽

Pedicle Screws ◽

Sensory Loss ◽

Screw Placement ◽

X Rays ◽

Pedicle Screw Placement ◽

Asymptomatic Patients ◽

Placement Accuracy

<sec><title>Study Design</title>This study was designed as a survey amongst Canadian spine surgeon to determine a scoring system to standardize pedicle screw placement assessment.</sec><sec><title>Purpose</title>This study aimed to obtain and analyze the opinions of spine surgeons regarding the assessment of pedicle screw accuracy, with the goal of establishing clinical guidelines for interventions for malpositioned pedicle screws.</sec><sec><title>Overview of Literature</title>Accurate placement of pedicle screws is challenging, and misalignment can lead to various complications. To date, there is no recognized gold standard for assessing pedicle screw placement accuracy. The literature is lacking studies attempting to standardize pedicle screw placement accuracy assessment.</sec><sec><title>Methods</title>A survey of the clinical methods and imaging criteria that are used for assessing pedicle screw placement accuracy was designed and sent to orthopedic and neurosurgery spine surgeons from the Canadian Spine Society for their anonymous participation.</sec><sec><title>Results</title>Thirty-five surgeons completed the questionnaire. The most commonly used modalities for assessing pedicle screw position postoperatively were plain X-rays (97%) and computed tomography (CT, 97%). In both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients, the most and least worrisome breaches were medial and anterior breaches, respectively. The majority of surgeons tended not to re-operate on asymptomatic breaches. More than 60% of surgeons would re-operate on patients with new-onset pain and a ≤4-mm medial or inferior breach in both thoracic and lumbar regions. If a patient experienced sensory loss and a breach on CT, in either the thoracic or lumbar levels, 90% and 70% of the surgeons would re-operate for a medial breach and an inferior breach, respectively.</sec><sec><title>Conclusions</title>Postoperative clinical presentation and imaging findings are crucial for interpreting aberrant pedicle screw placement. This study presents a preliminary scoring system for standardizing the classification of pedicle screws.</sec>

Download Full-text

Confirmation of accuracy/inaccuracy of lumbar pedicle screw placement using postoperative computed tomography

Surgical Neurology International ◽

10.25259/sni_290_2021 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 12 ◽

pp. 518

Author(s):

Mohamed M. Arnaout ◽

Magdy O. ElSheikh ◽

Mansour A. Makia

Keyword(s):

Computed Tomography ◽

Lumbar Spine ◽

Pedicle Screw ◽

Pedicle Screws ◽

Operative Intervention ◽

Screw Placement ◽

Lumbar Spine Surgery ◽

Pedicle Screw Placement ◽

Lumbar Pedicle ◽

Ct Studies

Background: Transpedicular screws are extensively utilized in lumbar spine surgery. The placement of these screws is typically guided by anatomical landmarks and intraoperative fluoroscopy. Here, we utilized 2-week postoperative computed tomography (CT) studies to confirm the accuracy/inaccuracy of lumbar pedicle screw placement in 145 patients and correlated these findings with clinical outcomes. Methods: Over 6 months, we prospectively evaluated the location of 612 pedicle screws placed in 145 patients undergoing instrumented lumbar fusions addressing diverse pathology with instability. Routine anteroposterior and lateral plain radiographs were obtained 48 h after the surgery, while CT scans were obtained at 2 postoperative weeks (i.e., ideally these should have been performed intraoperatively or within 24–48 h of surgery). Results: Of the 612 screws, minor misplacement of screws (≤2 mm) was seen in 104 patients, moderate misplacement in 34 patients (2–4 mm), and severe misplacement in 7 patients (>4 mm). Notably, all the latter 7 (4.8% of the 145) patients required repeated operative intervention. Conclusion: Transpedicular screw insertion in the lumbar spine carries the risks of pedicle medial/lateral violation that is best confirmed on CT rather than X-rays/fluoroscopy alone. Here, we additional found 7 patients (4.8%) who with severe medial/lateral pedicle breach who warranting repeated operative intervention. In the future, CT studies should be performed intraoperatively or within 24–48 h of surgery to confirm the location of pedicle screws and rule in our out medial or lateral pedicle breaches.

Download Full-text

Application of a Novel Attachable Magnetic Nerve Stimulating Probe in Intraoperative Lumbar Pedicle Screw Placement: A Porcine Model Study

Applied Sciences ◽

10.3390/app11177801 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 11 (17) ◽

pp. 7801

Author(s):

Tae Sik Goh ◽

Sung-Chan Shin ◽

Hyun-Keun Kwon ◽

Eui-Suk Sung ◽

Se Bin Jun ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Pedicle Screw ◽

Porcine Model ◽

Lumbar Vertebrae ◽

Pedicle Screws ◽

Screw Placement ◽

Lumbar Spine Surgery ◽

Pedicle Screw Placement ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Screw Malpositioning ◽

Lumbar Pedicle

Pedicle screw instrumentation is a fundamental technique in lumbar spine surgery. However, several complications could occur when placing a pedicle screw, the most serious being damage to the neural structures. We developed an attachable magnetic nerve stimulating probe used for triggered electromyography (t-EMG) to avoid these. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of this probe for intraoperative neuromonitoring (ION) during lumbar pedicle screw placement in a porcine model. Forty pedicle screws were inserted bilaterally into the pedicles of the fourth and fifth lumbar vertebrae of five pigs; 20 were inserted typically into the pedicle without nerve damage (Group A), and the other 20 were inserted through the broken medial wall of the pedicle to permit contact with the neural structures (Group B). We measured the triggered threshold for pedicle screw placement through the conventional nerve probe and our newly developed magnetic probe. There was no significant difference in the triggered threshold between the two instruments (p = 0.828). Our newly developed magnetic stimulating probe can be attached to a screwdriver, thus preventing real-time screw malpositioning and making it practical and equally safe. This probe could become indispensable in revision spine surgeries with severe adhesions or endoscopic spine surgeries.

Download Full-text

A Quantitative Accuracy Assessment of The Use of A Rigid Robotic Arm In Navigated Placement of 726 Pedicle Screws

10.21203/rs.3.rs-588342/v1 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Carlo Alberto Benech ◽

Rosa Perez ◽

Franco Benech ◽

Torrey Shirk ◽

Brandon Bucklen

Keyword(s):

Minimally Invasive ◽

Pedicle Screw ◽

Accuracy Assessment ◽

Demographic Data ◽

Pedicle Screws ◽

Screw Placement ◽

Complication Rates ◽

Pedicle Screw Placement ◽

Preoperative Ct ◽

Placement Accuracy

Abstract Background: Traditional minimally invasive fluoroscopy-based techniques for pedicle screw placement utilize guidance, which may require fluoroscopic shots. Computerized tomography (CT) navigation results in more accurate screw placement. Robotic surgery seeks to establish access and trajectory with greater accuracy. Objective: This study evaluated the screw placement accuracy of a robotic platform.Methods: Demographic data, preoperative/postoperative CT scans, and complication rates of 127 patients who underwent lumbosacral pedicle screw placement with minimally invasive navigated robotic guidance using preoperative CT were analyzed. Results: On the GRS scale, 97.9% (711/726) of screws were graded A or B, 1.7% (12/726) of screws graded C, 0.4% (3/726) of screws graded D, and 0% graded E. Average offset from preoperative plan to final screw placement was 1.9 ± 1.5 mm from tip, 2.2 ± 1.4 mm from tail and 2.9 ± 2.3° of angulation.Conclusions: Robotic-assisted surgery utilizing preoperative CT workflow with intraoperative fluoroscopy-based registration improves pedicle screw placement accuracy within a patient’s pedicles.

Download Full-text

Comparative Analysis of Pedicle Screw Placement in Children with Congenital Scoliosis: Freehand Technique (in vivo) and Guide Templates (in vitro)

Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia ◽

10.21823/2311-2905-2018-24-4-53-63 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 24 (4) ◽

pp. 53-63 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

D. N. Kokushin ◽

S. V. Vissarionov ◽

A. G. Baindurashvili ◽

A. V. Ovechkina ◽

M. S. Poznovich

Keyword(s):

Lumbar Spine ◽

Pedicle Screw ◽

Pedicle Screws ◽

Congenital Scoliosis ◽

Screw Placement ◽

Pedicle Screw Placement ◽

Placement Accuracy ◽

Thoracolumbar Transition

Objective.To evaluate accuracy between pedicle screw placement in vertebral bodies achieved in vivo with freehand techniques versus their placement in vertebrae plastic models achieved in vitro with the use of guide templates, in toddlers and preschool children with congenital kyphoscoliosis of the thoracolumbar transition and lumbar spine amid the vertebral malformation.Material and Methods. The research is based on a retrospective analysis of the results of treatment of 10 patients with congenital kyphoscoliosis of the thoracolumbar transition and lumbar spine amid the vertebral malformation. Age – from 2 years 2 months to 6 years 8 months old (mean 3 years 8 months old), gender – 6 boys, 4 girls. Based on the postoperative multi-slice spiral computed tomography (MSCT) of the spine, the pedicle screws placement accuracy of the correcting multi-support metalwork was evaluated. These patients constituted the 1st research group (in vivo group). The 2nd research group (in vitro group) was formed from 27 vertebrae plastic models with pedicle screws inserted in them with the use of guide templates. The placement accuracy of the installed pedicle support elements was assessed based on the S.D. Gertzbein et al. scale (1990).Results. In the 1st group, there were 52 pedicle screws placed. The screw placement accuracy according to the rate of misplacement, as follows: 53.8% in Grade 0, 25% in Grade I, 11.6% in Grade II, 9.6% in Grade III. The number of screws with the rate of misplacement in Grade 0 + Grade I was 41 (78.8%). In the 2nd group, there were 54 screws placed and slightly larger than the 1st group. The screw placement accuracy according to the rate of misplacement was 94.4% in Grade 0, 1.9% in Grade I, 3.7% in Grade II, respectively. The number of screws with the rate of misplacement in Grade 0 + Grade I was 52 (96.3%).Conclusions.Comparative analysis showed that the number of pedicle screws successfully placed in vertebrae plastic models in children with congenital deformities of the thoracolumbar transition and lumbar spine achieved with the use of guide templates was significantly higher than the number of screws successfully placed with freehand techniques (96.3% versus 80.8%, p = 0.011). The results obtained with method of navigation templates in vitro showed high precision and accuracy of pedicle screw placement which gives the prospect for using this type of navigation in clinical practice in toddlers with congenital scoliosis.

Download Full-text

Three-dimensional assessment of robot-assisted pedicle screw placement accuracy and instrumentation reliability based on a preplanned trajectory

Journal of Neurosurgery Spine ◽

10.3171/2020.3.spine20208 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 33 (4) ◽

pp. 519-528

Author(s):

Bowen Jiang ◽

Zach Pennington ◽

Alex Zhu ◽

Stavros Matsoukas ◽

A. Karim Ahmed ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Pedicle Screw ◽

Tertiary Care ◽

Pedicle Screws ◽

Screw Placement ◽

Lumbosacral Spine ◽

Grading System ◽

Angular Deviation ◽

Pedicle Screw Placement ◽

Placement Accuracy ◽

The Mean

OBJECTIVERobotic spine surgery systems are increasingly used in the US market. As this technology gains traction, however, it is necessary to identify mechanisms that assess its effectiveness and allow for its continued improvement. One such mechanism is the development of a new 3D grading system that can serve as the foundation for error-based learning in robot systems. Herein the authors attempted 1) to define a system of providing accuracy data along all three pedicle screw placement axes, that is, cephalocaudal, mediolateral, and screw long axes; and 2) to use the grading system to evaluate the mean accuracy of thoracolumbar pedicle screws placed using a single commercially available robotic system.METHODSThe authors retrospectively reviewed a prospectively maintained, IRB-approved database of patients at a single tertiary care center who had undergone instrumented fusion of the thoracic or lumbosacral spine using robotic assistance. Patients with preoperatively planned screw trajectories and postoperative CT studies were included in the final analysis. Screw accuracy was measured as the net deviation of the planned trajectory from the actual screw trajectory in the mediolateral, cephalocaudal, and screw long axes.RESULTSThe authors identified 47 patients, 51% male, whose pedicles had been instrumented with a total of 254 screws (63 thoracic, 191 lumbosacral). The patients had a mean age of 61.1 years and a mean BMI of 30.0 kg/m2. The mean screw tip accuracies were 1.3 ± 1.3 mm, 1.2 ± 1.1 mm, and 2.6 ± 2.2 mm in the mediolateral, cephalocaudal, and screw long axes, respectively, for a net linear deviation of 3.6 ± 2.3 mm and net angular deviation of 3.6° ± 2.8°. According to the Gertzbein-Robbins grading system, 184 screws (72%) were classified as grade A and 70 screws (28%) as grade B. Placement of 100% of the screws was clinically acceptable.CONCLUSIONSThe accuracy of the discussed robotic spine system is similar to that described for other surgical systems. Additionally, the authors outline a new method of grading screw placement accuracy that measures deviation in all three relevant axes. This grading system could provide the error signal necessary for unsupervised machine learning by robotic systems, which would in turn support continued improvement in instrumentation placement accuracy.

Download Full-text

The accuracy of pedicle screw placement using intraoperative image guidance systems

Journal of Neurosurgery Spine ◽

10.3171/2013.11.spine13413 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 20 (2) ◽

pp. 196-203 ◽

Cited By ~ 155

Author(s):

Alexander Mason ◽

Renee Paulsen ◽

Jason M. Babuska ◽

Sharad Rajpal ◽

Sigita Burneikiene ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Pedicle Screw ◽

Image Guidance ◽

Pedicle Screws ◽

Screw Placement ◽

Data Sets ◽

Pedicle Screw Placement ◽

Fluoroscopic Image ◽

Fluoroscopic Navigation ◽

Guidance Systems ◽

Accuracy Rates

Object Several retrospective studies have demonstrated higher accuracy rates and increased safety for navigated pedicle screw placement than for free-hand techniques; however, the accuracy differences between navigation systems has not been extensively studied. In some instances, 3D fluoroscopic navigation methods have been reported to not be more accurate than 2D navigation methods for pedicle screw placement. The authors of this study endeavored to identify if 3D fluoroscopic navigation methods resulted in a higher placement accuracy of pedicle screws. Methods A systematic analysis was conducted to examine pedicle screw insertion accuracy based on the use of 2D, 3D, and conventional fluoroscopic image guidance systems. A PubMed and MEDLINE database search was conducted to review the published literature that focused on the accuracy of pedicle screw placement using intraoperative, real-time fluoroscopic image guidance in spine fusion surgeries. The pedicle screw accuracy rates were segregated according to spinal level because each spinal region has individual anatomical and morphological variations. Descriptive statistics were used to compare the pedicle screw insertion accuracy rate differences among the navigation methods. Results A total of 30 studies were included in the analysis. The data were abstracted and analyzed for the following groups: 12 data sets that used conventional fluoroscopy, 8 data sets that used 2D fluoroscopic navigation, and 20 data sets that used 3D fluoroscopic navigation. These studies included 1973 patients in whom 9310 pedicle screws were inserted. With conventional fluoroscopy, 2532 of 3719 screws were inserted accurately (68.1% accuracy); with 2D fluoroscopic navigation, 1031 of 1223 screws were inserted accurately (84.3% accuracy); and with 3D fluoroscopic navigation, 4170 of 4368 screws were inserted accurately (95.5% accuracy). The accuracy rates when 3D was compared with 2D fluoroscopic navigation were also consistently higher throughout all individual spinal levels. Conclusions Three-dimensional fluoroscopic image guidance systems demonstrated a significantly higher pedicle screw placement accuracy than conventional fluoroscopy or 2D fluoroscopic image guidance methods.

Download Full-text

Utility of intraoperative electromyography in placing C7 pedicle screws

Journal of Neurosurgery Spine ◽

10.3171/2019.11.spine191120 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 32 (6) ◽

pp. 891-899 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Jonathan J. Rasouli ◽

Brooke T. Kennamer ◽

Frank M. Moore ◽

Alfred Steinberger ◽

Kevin C. Yao ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cervical Spine ◽

Pedicle Screw ◽

Thoracolumbar Spine ◽

Pedicle Screws ◽

Neurological Injury ◽

Screw Placement ◽

Pedicle Screw Placement ◽

Data Set ◽

Subaxial Cervical Spine ◽

Increased Risk

OBJECTIVEThe C7 vertebral body is morphometrically unique; it represents the transition from the subaxial cervical spine to the upper thoracic spine. It has larger pedicles but relatively small lateral masses compared to other levels of the subaxial cervical spine. Although the biomechanical properties of C7 pedicle screws are superior to those of lateral mass screws, they are rarely placed due to increased risk of neurological injury. Although pedicle screw stimulation has been shown to be safe and effective in determining satisfactory screw placement in the thoracolumbar spine, there are few studies determining its utility in the cervical spine. Thus, the purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility, clinical reliability, and threshold characteristics of intraoperative evoked electromyographic (EMG) stimulation in determining satisfactory pedicle screw placement at C7.METHODSThe authors retrospectively reviewed a prospectively collected data set. All adult patients who underwent posterior cervical decompression and fusion with placement of C7 pedicle screws at the authors’ institution between January 2015 and March 2019 were identified. Demographic, clinical, neurophysiological, operative, and radiographic data were gathered. All patients underwent postoperative CT scanning, and the position of C7 pedicle screws was compared to intraoperative neurophysiological data.RESULTSFifty-one consecutive C7 pedicle screws were stimulated and recorded intraoperatively in 25 consecutive patients. Based on EMG findings, 1 patient underwent intraoperative repositioning of a C7 pedicle screw, and 1 underwent removal of a C7 pedicle screw. CT scans demonstrated ideal placement of the C7 pedicle screw in 40 of 43 instances in which EMG stimulation thresholds were > 15 mA. In the remaining 3 cases the trajectories were suboptimal but safe. When the screw stimulation thresholds were between 11 and 15 mA, 5 of 6 screws were suboptimal but safe, and in 1 instance was potentially dangerous. In instances in which the screw stimulated at thresholds ≤ 10 mA, all trajectories were potentially dangerous with neural compression.CONCLUSIONSIdeal C7 pedicle screw position strongly correlated with EMG stimulation thresholds > 15 mA. In instances, in which the screw stimulates at values between 11 and 15 mA, screw trajectory exploration is recommended. Screws with thresholds ≤ 10 mA should always be explored, and possibly repositioned or removed. In conjunction with other techniques, EMG threshold testing is a useful and safe modality in determining appropriate C7 pedicle screw placement.

Download Full-text