Fast Starters and Slow Starters After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement: Correlation of Early Postoperative Pain and 2-Year Outcomes

Background: Patients experience varying degrees of pain and symptoms during the early recovery period after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Some “fast starters” report minimal discomfort and are eager to advance activities, while “slow starters” describe severe pain and limitations. The relationship between these early postoperative symptoms and 2-year outcomes after hip arthroscopy is unknown. Purpose: To analyze the relationship between early postoperative pain and 2-year patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after hip arthroscopy for FAI. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Patients without arthritis or dysplasia who were undergoing primary hip arthroscopy for FAI were prospectively enrolled and completed validated PROs. Scores for visual analog scale (VAS) for pain were collected preoperatively and at 1 week, 6 weeks, and 2 years postoperatively. Scores for the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), and 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) were collected preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively. Paired t tests were used to evaluate PRO score changes, and correlation analyses were used to assess relationships between early postoperative pain and 2-year postoperative outcomes. Results: A total of 166 patients were included (55% female; mean ± SD age, 35.29 ± 9.6 years; mean body mass index, 25.07 ± 3.98 kg/m2). Patients demonstrated significant improvements in PRO scores (VAS, SF-12 Physical Component Score, mHHS, and all HOOS subscales) at 2 years after hip arthroscopy for FAI ( P < .001). There was a significant correlation between lower 1-week VAS pain level (fast starters) and lower 2-year VAS pain level ( R = 0.31; P < .001) as well as higher 2-year PRO scores (SF-12 Physical Component Score, mHHS, and all HOOS subscales: R = −0.21 to −0.3; P < .001). There was no correlation between 1-week VAS pain and 2-year SF-12 Mental Component Score ( P = .17). Preoperative VAS pain levels showed positive correlations with 1-week postoperative pain scores ( R = 0.39; P < .001) and negative correlations with 2-year patient outcomes ( R = −0.15 to −0.33, P < .01). There was no correlation between 6-week postoperative pain scores and 2-year PRO scores. Conclusion: Fast starters after hip arthroscopy for FAI experience sustained improvements in outcomes at 2 years after surgery. Patient pain levels before surgery may delineate potential fast starters and slow starters.

Download Full-text

When Do Patients Improve After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement? A Prospective Cohort Analysis

The American Journal of Sports Medicine ◽

10.1177/0363546518795696 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 46 (13) ◽

pp. 3111-3118 ◽

Cited By ~ 27

Author(s):

Sergio E. Flores ◽

Joseph R. Sheridan ◽

Kristina R. Borak ◽

Alan L. Zhang

Keyword(s):

Patient Outcomes ◽

Femoroacetabular Impingement ◽

Hip Arthroscopy ◽

Short Form ◽

Cohort Analysis ◽

Case Series ◽

Harris Hip Score ◽

Physical Component Score ◽

Level Of Evidence ◽

Patient Reported

Background: Hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) has been shown to improve patient outcomes, especially for returning to sport. Although previous studies often evaluated outcomes 2 years after hip arthroscopy, there has been no analysis of the progression of patient improvement over time or with respect to achieving the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). Hypothesis/Purpose: The purpose was to prospectively evaluate changes in patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores during the first 2 years after hip arthroscopy for FAI and to analyze when the MCID is achieved. It was hypothesized that clinically significant changes will be reached by 1 year after surgery. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for FAI were prospectively enrolled, and they completed the 12-Item Short Form Health survey (SF-12), modified Harris Hip Score, and Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) at preoperative baseline and 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after surgery. Mean scores and the percentage of patients reaching the MCID at each time point were analyzed via analysis of variance and Cochrane-Armitage trend tests. Results: A total of 129 hips from 122 patients were evaluated, revealing significant improvements after hip arthroscopy for FAI (PRO scores increased 19 to 45 points) with 95.8%, 93.6%, and 84.8% of patients achieving the MCID for HOOS-Sports, HOOS–Quality of Life (QoL), and HOOS-Pain, respectively, at 2-year follow-up. Analysis of PRO change showed that for all scores, the greatest improvement occurred from presurgery to postoperative 3 months, with lesser improvements at subsequent 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year time points ( P < .001). The SF-12 physical component score, HOOS-Sports, and HOOS-QoL continued to show statistically significant improvements through 2 years, while other scores plateaued after 3 months. The percentage of patients achieving the MCID for HOOS-Sports, HOOS-QoL, and HOOS-Pain continued to increase over 2 years, but the percentage achieving the MCID did not increase after 3 months for all other scores. Conclusion: Hip arthroscopy for FAI yields significant improvements in patient outcomes within 2 years of surgery. The majority of improvement occurs within 3 months after surgery, but certain outcomes, such as returning to sport, QoL, and pain, can continue to improve through 2 years.

Download Full-text

Clinically Significant Outcome Improvement After Hip Arthroscopy in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome and Severe Femoral Torsion

Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine ◽

10.1177/23259671211034588 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 9 (10) ◽

pp. 232596712110345

Author(s):

Steven F. DeFroda ◽

Thomas D. Alter ◽

Blake M. Bodendorfer ◽

Alexander C. Newhouse ◽

Felipe S. Bessa ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Femoroacetabular Impingement ◽

Hip Arthroscopy ◽

Impingement Syndrome ◽

Harris Hip Score ◽

Femoral Torsion ◽

Outcome Score ◽

Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome ◽

Patient Reported ◽

Outcome Improvement ◽

Clinically Significant

Background: The influence of femoral torsion on clinically significant outcome improvement after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) has not been well-studied. Purpose: To quantify femoral torsion in FAIS patients using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and explore the relationship between femoral torsion and clinically significant outcome improvement after hip arthroscopy. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Included were patients who underwent hip arthroscopy for FAIS between January 2012 and August 2018 and had 2-year follow-up and preoperative MRI scans containing transcondylar slices of the knee. Participants were categorized as having severe retrotorsion (SR; <0°), normal torsion (NT; 0°-25°), and severe antetorsion (SA; >25°) as measured on MRI. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) included the Hip Outcome Score–Activities of Daily Living, Hip Outcome Score–Sports Subscale, modified Harris Hip Score, 12-item International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12), and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and satisfaction. Achievement of Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) were analyzed among cohorts. Results: Included were 183 patients (SR, n = 13; NT, n = 154; SA, n = 16) with a mean age, body mass index, and femoral torsion of 30.6 ± 12.1 years, 24.0 ± 4.4 kg/m2, and 12.55° ± 9.58°, respectively. The mean torsion was –4.5° ± 2.6° for the SR, 12.1° ± 6.8° for the NT, and 31.0° ± 3.6° for the SA group. There were between-group differences in the proportion of patients who achieved PASS and SCB on the iHOT-12, pain VAS, and any PRO ( P < .05). Post hoc analysis indicated that the SA group achieved lower rates of PASS and SCB on the iHOT-12 and pain VAS, and lower rates of PASS on any PRO versus the SR group ( P < .05); the SR group achieved higher rates of PASS and SCB on pain VAS scores versus the NT group ( P = .003). Conclusion: The orientation and severity of femoral torsion during hip arthroscopy influenced the propensity for clinically significant outcome improvement. Specifically, patients with femoral retrotorsion and femoral antetorsion had higher and lower rates of clinically significant outcome improvement, respectively.

Download Full-text

Acetabular Morphologic Characteristics Predict Early Conversion to Arthroplasty After Isolated Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement

The American Journal of Sports Medicine ◽

10.1177/0363546519888894 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 48 (1) ◽

pp. 188-196 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Brian D. Giordano ◽

Benjamin D. Kuhns ◽

Itay Perets ◽

Leslie Yuen ◽

Benjamin G. Domb

Keyword(s):

Femoroacetabular Impingement ◽

Hip Arthroscopy ◽

Odds Ratio ◽

Preoperative Imaging ◽

Harris Hip Score ◽

Center Edge ◽

Patient Reported ◽

Outcome Scores ◽

Outerbridge Grade ◽

Tönnis Grade

Background: Hip arthroscopy in the setting of dysplasia and borderline dysplasia is controversial. Dysplasia severity is most often defined by the lateral center edge angle (LCEA) but can also be evaluated radiographically by the acetabular inclination (AI). Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose was to determine the effect of AI on outcomes after isolated hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). We hypothesized that patients with dysplasia would have higher rates of arthroplasty as well as inferior clinical and functional outcomes compared with patients who did not have dysplasia. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A hip arthroscopy registry was reviewed for participants undergoing arthroscopic correction of FAI from February 28, 2008, to June 10, 2013. Participants required a clinical diagnosis and isolated arthroscopic correction of FAI with preoperative imaging and intraoperative cartilage status recorded. AI dysplasia was defined as an AI greater than 10°, LCEA dysplasia as LCEA less than 18°, and borderline LCEA dysplasia as LCEA 18° to 25°. Patients without an acetabular deformity (LCEA 25°-40°; AI <10°) served as a control population. Postoperative variables included patient-reported outcome surveys with conversion to arthroplasty as the primary endpoint. Minimum 5-year outcome scores were obtained for 337 of 419 patients (80.4%) with an average follow-up of 75.2 ± 12.7 months. Results: This study included 419 patients: 9 (2%) with LCEA dysplasia, 42 (10%) with AI dysplasia, and 51 (12%) with borderline dysplasia. The AI but not LCEA was significantly correlated with lower outcome scores on the modified Harris Hip Score ( r = 0.13; P = .01), Non-Arthritic Hip Score ( r = 0.10; P = .04), and Hip Outcome Score–Sports Subscale ( r = 0.11; P = .04). A total of 58 patients (14%) underwent arthroplasty at 31 ± 20 months postoperatively. Patients with LCEA dysplasia had an arthroplasty rate of 56% (odds ratio, 8.4), whereas patients with AI dysplasia had an arthroplasty rate of 31% (odds ratio, 3.3), which was significantly greater than the rate for the nondysplastic cohort (13.5%; P < .0001). Patients with borderline LCEA dysplasia did not have increased rates of arthroplasty. A multivariate analysis found increasing age, increasing AI, Tönnis grade higher than 1, and femoral Outerbridge grade higher than 2 to be most predictive of conversion to arthroplasty. Conclusion: We found that an elevated AI, along with increasing age, Tönnis grade, and femoral Outerbridge grade significantly predict early conversion to arthroplasty after isolated hip arthroscopy. We recommend using the AI, in addition to the LCEA, in evaluating hip dysplasia before hip arthroscopy.

Download Full-text

Bilateral versus unilateral hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement: a systematic review

Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery ◽

10.1093/jhps/hnaa013 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 7 (2) ◽

pp. 225-232

Author(s):

Claire E Fernandez ◽

Allison M Morgan ◽

Ujash Sheth ◽

Vehniah K Tjong ◽

Michael A Terry

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Femoroacetabular Impingement ◽

Hip Arthroscopy ◽

Case Reports ◽

Case Series ◽

Return To Sport ◽

Harris Hip Score ◽

Study Patient ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Patient Reported

Abstract One in four patients presenting with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) has bilateral symptoms, and despite excellent outcomes reported after arthroscopic treatment of FAI, there remains a paucity of data on the outcomes following bilateral hip arthroscopy. This systematic review aims to examine the outcomes following bilateral (either ‘simultaneous’ or ‘staged’) versus unilateral hip arthroscopy for FAI. A systematic review of multiple electronic databases was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and checklist. All studies comparing simultaneous, staged and/or unilateral hip arthroscopy for FAI were eligible for inclusion. Case series, case reports and reviews were excluded. All study, patient and hip-specific data were extracted and analyzed. The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale was used to assess study quality. A meta-analysis was not performed due to heterogeneity among outcome measures. A total of six studies, including 722 patients (42.8% male) and 933 hips were eligible for inclusion. The mean age across patients was 35.5. The average time between staged procedures was 7.7 months. Four of the six studies were retrospective cohort studies, while the remaining two were prospective in nature. The overall quality of the eligible studies was found to be good. No significant difference was noted among patient-reported outcomes (modified Harris hip score, hip outcome score and non-arthritic hip score), visual analog scale, return to sport, traction time and complications between those undergoing bilateral (simultaneous or staged) versus unilateral hip arthroscopy. Based on the current available evidence, bilateral hip arthroscopy (whether simultaneous or staged) exhibits similar efficacy and safety when compared with unilateral hip arthroscopy. However, further prospective study is required to confirm this finding.

Download Full-text

Detailing postoperative pain and opioid utilization after periacetabular osteotomy with automated mobile messaging

Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery ◽

10.1093/jhps/hnz049 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 6 (4) ◽

pp. 370-376

Author(s):

Christina Hajewski ◽

Chris A Anthony ◽

Edward O Rojas ◽

Robert Westermann ◽

Michael Willey

Keyword(s):

Postoperative Pain ◽

Response Rate ◽

Periacetabular Osteotomy ◽

Pain Medication ◽

Pain Level ◽

Pain Scores ◽

Medication Utilization ◽

Patient Reported ◽

Average Pain ◽

Daily Pain

Abstract In the setting of periacetabular osteotomy (PAO), this investigation sought to (i) describe patient-reported pain scores and opioid utilization in the first 6 weeks following surgery and (ii) evaluate the effectiveness of postoperative communication using a robotic mobile messaging platform. Subjects indicated for PAO were enrolled from a young adult hip clinic. For the first 2 weeks after surgery, subjects received daily mobile messages inquiring about pain level on a 0–10 scale and the number of opioid pain medication tablets they consumed in the previous 24 h. Messaging frequency decreased to 3 per week in Weeks 3–6. Pain scores, opioid utilization and response rates with our mobile messaging platform were quantified for the 6-week postoperative period. Twenty-nine subjects underwent PAO. Twenty-one had concurrent hip arthroscopy. Average daily pain scores decreased over the first four postoperative days. Average pain scores reported were 5.9 ± 1.9, 4.1 ± 3.3 and 3.0 ± 3.5 on Day 1, Day 14 and Week 6, respectively. Reported opioid tablet utilization was 5.0 ± 3.2, 2.2 ± 2.0 and 0.0 ± 0.0 on Days 1 and 14 and at 6 weeks. Response rate for participants completing the 6-week messaging protocol was 84.1%. Patient-reported pain scores decreased over the first two postoperative weeks following PAO before plateauing in weeks 3–6. Opioid pain medication utilization increased in the first postoperative week before gradually declining to no tabs consumed at 6 weeks after PAO. Automated mobile messaging is an effective method of perioperative communication for the collection of pain scores and opioid utilization in patients undergoing PAO.

Download Full-text

Predictors of Persistent Postoperative Pain at Minimum Two-years After Arthroscopic Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement

Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine ◽

10.1177/2325967119s00201 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 7 (3_suppl2) ◽

pp. 2325967119S0020

Author(s):

Austin V. Stone ◽

Philip Malloy ◽

William H. Neal ◽

Edward Beck ◽

Brian Robert Waterman ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Mental Health ◽

Postoperative Pain ◽

Femoroacetabular Impingement ◽

Hip Arthroscopy ◽

Persistent Pain ◽

Anxiety And Depression ◽

Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome ◽

Patient Reported ◽

History Of ◽

Persistent Postoperative Pain

Objectives: To evaluate predictors for persistent postoperative pain following hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS). We hypothesized that patients with chronic preoperative pain, smokers, and those with co-morbid mental health disease would have greater persistent postoperative pain. Methods: Patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for FAIS were identified in a prospectively collected database with a minimum of two-year follow-up with patient reported outcomes (PROs). Previous open hip surgery and diagnoses other than FAIS were excluded. Patients were grouped by VAS-Pain scores as limited (≤30) and persistent (>30). Patient factors and outcomes were analyzed with univariate and correlation analyses to build a logistic regression to identify predictors of postoperative pain. Results: The limited pain (n=514) and persistent pain (n=174) groups totaled 688 patients (449 females). The persistent pain group was significantly older with a greater proportion of revision arthroscopy, worker’s compensation cases, smokers, hypertension, a history of a psychiatric diagnosis and preoperative narcotic use. Both collegiate sport participation [odds ratio (OR) -6.09 (95% CI: -1.23--30.3, p=0.027) and frequent running (OR -1.75, 95% CI: -1.09--2.81; p=0.021) decreased risk for pain. Smokers were 2.22 times more likely to have persistent pain (p=0.032; 95% CI: 1.07-4.46). A history of anxiety and depression is associated with 2.87 greater risk for persistent pain (p=0.030; 95% CI: 1.11-7.45). Conclusion: Independent predictors for persistent postoperative pain include current smoking and mental health history positive for anxiety and depression. Running as a primary form of exercise and high-level athletic participation are protective against persistent pain. Additional risk factors for increased pain include increased age, workers’ compensation claim, previous comorbid disease treated with surgery, and decreased preoperative PROs. Our analysis demonstrated significant improvements in both pain and functional PROs in both the limited pain and persistent pain groups; however, those with persistent pain demonstrated significantly inferior PROs.

Download Full-text

Efficacy of preemptive analgesia versus postoperative analgesia of celecoxib on postoperative pain, patients’ global assessment and hip function recovery in femoroacetabular impingement patients underwent hip arthroscopy surgery

Inflammopharmacology ◽

10.1007/s10787-019-00648-8 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 28 (1) ◽

pp. 131-137 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Xiaoping Zhu

Keyword(s):

Postoperative Pain ◽

Femoroacetabular Impingement ◽

Postoperative Analgesia ◽

Hip Arthroscopy ◽

Global Assessment ◽

Preemptive Analgesia ◽

Harris Hip Score ◽

Function Recovery ◽

Hip Function ◽

Pain Patients

Abstract We aimed to investigate the efficacy of preemptive analgesia of celecoxib on postoperative pain, patients’ global assessment (PGA) and hip function recovery compared to postoperative analgesia of celecoxib in femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) patients who underwent hip arthroscopy surgery (HAS). The 100 FAI patients underwent HAS were randomly allocated to preemptive analgesia group (N = 50) or postoperative analgesia group (N = 50) as a 1:1 ratio for 3 months. Pain visual analog scale (VAS) score, PGA score, rescue-use pethidine consumption and Harris hip score were assessed. Compared to postoperative analgesia group, pain VAS score decreased on day 1 (P = 0.036), day 2 (P = 0.046) and day 3 (P = 0.046), while was similar prior to operation (P = 0.587), on day 7 (P = 0.398), at month 1 (P = 0.461) and month 3 (P = 0.805) in preemptive analgesia group. Besides, rescue-use pethidine consumption was decreased in preemptive analgesia group than postoperative analgesia group within 3 days (P = 0.016) and within 7 days (P = 0.033) post-operation. For PGA score, it reduced on day 2 (P = 0.030) and day 3 (P = 0.048), while was similar prior to operation (P = 0.699), on day 1 (P = 0.699), day 7 (P = 0.224), at month 1 (P = 0.640) and month 3 (P = 0.400) in preemptive analgesia group than postoperative analgesia group. For Harris hip score, it was similar prior to operation (P = 0.372), on day 7 (P = 0.366), at month 1 (P = 0.466) and month 3 (P = 0.658) between the two groups. In conclusion, preemptive analgesia of celecoxib decreases short-term postoperative pain and PGA, but without effect on long-term hip function recovery than postoperative analgesia of celecoxib in FAI patients who underwent HAS.

Download Full-text

Is there a gender gap in outcomes after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement? Assessment of clinically meaningful improvements in a prospective cohort

Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine ◽

10.1177/2325967120s00437 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 8 (7_suppl6) ◽

pp. 2325967120S0043

Author(s):

Sergio Flores ◽

Caitlin Chambers ◽

Kristina Borak ◽

Alan Zhang

Keyword(s):

Femoroacetabular Impingement ◽

Gender Gap ◽

Hip Arthroscopy ◽

Short Form ◽

Patient Reported Outcome ◽

Harris Hip Score ◽

Power Calculation ◽

Age Group ◽

Patient Gender ◽

Patient Reported

Objectives: Although patients have been found to have significant improvements after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), prior studies suggest women have worse outcomes compared to men. These previous studies lack comparisons of patient reported outcome (PRO) scores based on gender with respect to clinical significance measurements, including the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS). Therefore, the purpose of this study is to evaluate outcomes following hip arthroscopy for FAI based on patient gender by prospectively assessing changes in PRO scores, MCID, and PASS. Methods: Women and men undergoing hip arthroscopy for FAI were prospectively enrolled and preoperative radiographic and intra-operative findings were collected. The cohort was stratified based on self-identified patient gender so the term gender as well as the terms women and men were used to describe the patients as opposed to sex and the terms female and male. Patients completed the following PRO surveys before surgery and 2-years postoperatively: modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), and the 12-Item Short Form Health survey (SF-12). Mean scores and the percentage of patients reaching MCID and PASS were analyzed. An a priori power calculation was performed which determined 42 hips in each group were needed to adequately power the study to 95%. Results: A total of 131 hips, from 72 women and 59 men were included. The mean ± SD age for women and men was 34.2 ± 9.5 vs 35.8 ± 10.3 years, respectively; P= .347 and body mass index (BMI) of 24.9 ± 4.4 vs 25.5 ± 3.3 kg/m2, respectively; P= .379. Women had smaller preoperative alpha angles (59.1 vs 63.7, respectively; P< 0.001) and lower acetabular cartilage injury grade (6.9% vs 22.0% with grade 4 injury, respectively; P= 0.013). Both women and men achieved equivalent significant improvements in PRO scores after surgery (PRO scores increased 18.4 to 45.1 points for mHHS and HOOS). Women and men reached PASS for mHHS at similar rates (76.4% and 77.2%, respectively; P=0.915). MCID was also achieved at similar rates between women and men for all scores (ranged 61.4% to 88.9%) except HOOS-ADL in which a higher percentage of women reached MCID compared to men (79.2% vs 62.7%, respectively; P= .037). Additional stratification by age group using the median cohort age of 34 showed no significant differences in PRO improvement based on age group for each gender. Conclusions: Women can achieve clinically meaningful improvements in patient reported outcomes scores after hip arthroscopy for FAI. Compared to men, women demonstrated equivalent high rates of achieving MCID and PASS at 2 years following surgery. [Table: see text]

Download Full-text

Patient-Reported Outcomes Within the First Year After Hip Arthroscopy and Rehabilitation for Femoroacetabular Impingement and/or Labral Injury: The Difference Between Getting Better and Getting Back to Normal

The American Journal of Sports Medicine ◽

10.1177/0363546518786971 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 46 (11) ◽

pp. 2607-2614 ◽

Cited By ~ 19

Author(s):

Kristian Thorborg ◽

Otto Kraemer ◽

Anne-Dorthe Madsen ◽

Per Hölmich

Keyword(s):

Femoroacetabular Impingement ◽

Hip Arthroscopy ◽

Harris Hip Score ◽

First Year ◽

Healthy Population ◽

Minimal Important Change ◽

Healthy Controls ◽

Postoperative Rehabilitation ◽

Patient Reported ◽

Labral Injury

Background: The Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS) was recently found valid, reliable, and responsive for patients undergoing hip arthroscopy. However, it is currently unknown to what degree patients undergoing hip arthroscopy improve and/or normalize their HAGOS result within the first year after surgery. Purpose: First, to use HAGOS to evaluate clinical outcomes at 3, 6, and 12 months after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and/or labral injury and compare the HAGOS results with the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS). Second, to explore how many patients would (a) improve to a degree of minimal clinical importance (MIC) and (b) obtain scores within the reference intervals of healthy controls. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: From September 2011 to March 2014, 97 consecutive patients [56 females (mean age, 38 years; range, 17-60 years) and 41 males (mean age, 37 years; range, 19-59 years)] underwent first-time hip arthroscopy for FAI and/or labral injury. Standardized postoperative rehabilitation instructions were provided. HAGOS (0-100 points) and mHHS (0-100 points) values were obtained preoperatively and again postoperatively at 3, 6, and 12 months. Furthermore, 158 healthy controls, matched on age and sex, were included to obtain HAGOS and mHHS reference values for comparison. Minimal important change was determined by using the 0.5 SD of the baseline values for HAGOS and mHHS. Results: Improvements for all HAGOS subscales and mHHS results were seen at 3 months ( P < .001). Further improvements were seen only for HAGOS Sport and Recreation (Sport/Rec) and Participation in Physical Activities (PA) subscales between 3 and 12 months ( P < .05) but not for HAGOS Pain, Symptoms, Activities of Daily Living (ADL), or Hip-Related Quality of Life (QOL) subscales or the mHHS. Furthermore, on HAGOS Sport/Rec, PA, and QOL subscales, patients reached scores of only 54 to 70 points 1 year after surgery. At the individual level, up to 70% of the patients experienced minimal important improvements during the first year after surgery, but only up to 38% and 36% of patients reached a score within the reference interval of HAGOS and mHHS, respectively. Conclusion: Statistically and clinically relevant improvements in HAGOS and mHHS results after hip arthroscopy and rehabilitation can be seen at 3 months and up to 1 year. However, specific HAGOS subscales suggest that a patient’s ability to function and participate in sport and physical activity is still markedly reduced 1 year after surgery. Furthermore, the majority of patients undergoing hip arthroscopy cannot expect to reach the level of the healthy population on self-reported pain and function within the first year after surgery.

Download Full-text

Does capsular closure influence patient-reported outcomes in hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement and labral tear?

Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery ◽

10.1093/jhps/hnz025 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 6 (3) ◽

pp. 199-206 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Ran Atzmon ◽

Zachary T Sharfman ◽

Barak Haviv ◽

Michal Frankl ◽

Gilad Rotem ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Outcome ◽

Femoroacetabular Impingement ◽

Hip Arthroscopy ◽

Demographic Data ◽

Labral Tear ◽

Harris Hip Score ◽

Patient Reported ◽

Outcome Scores ◽

The Mean

Abstract Capsulotomy is necessary to facilitate instrument manoeuvrability within the joint capsule in many arthroscopic hip surgical procedures. In cases where a clear indication for capsular closure does not exist, surgeon’s preference and experience often determines capsular management. The purpose of this study was to assess the influence of capsular closure on clinical outcome scores and satisfaction in patients who underwent hip arthroscopy surgery for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and labral tear. Data were prospectively collected and retrospectively analysed for hip arthroscopy surgeries with a minimum 2 years follow-up. Patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip, previous back or hip surgeries, and degenerative changes to this hip and secondary gains were excluded. Demographic data, intraoperative findings and patient-reported outcome scores were recorded, including the Modified Harris Hip Score (MHHS) and Hip Outcome Score (HOS). A total of 29 and 35 patients were included in the non-closure and closure groups, respectively. The mean follow-up time was over 3 years for both groups. The mean pre-operative and post-operative HOS scores and MHHS scores did not significantly differ between groups (pre-operative HOS: 65.6 and 66.3, P = 0.898; post-operative HOS: 85.4 and 87.2, P = 0.718; pre-operative MHHS: 63.2 and 58.4, P = 0.223; post-operative MHHS: 85.7 and 88.7, P = 0.510). Overall patient satisfaction did not differ significantly between groups (non-closure 86.3%, closure group 88.6%; P = 0.672). Capsular closure did not significantly influence satisfaction or clinical outcome scores in patients who underwent arthroscopic hip surgery for FAI or labral tear.

Download Full-text