The promise of transformed long-term care homes: Evidence from the pandemic

2021 ◽  
pp. 084047042110377
Author(s):  
G. Allen Power ◽  
Jennifer Carson
Keyword(s):  
Infection Control ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Care Homes ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Disease Exposure ◽  
Green House Project ◽  
Health Experts

A combination of factors during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic led to a disproportionately high mortality rate among residents of long-term care homes in Canada and around the globe. Retrospectively, some of these factors could have been avoided or minimized. Many infection control approaches recommended by public health experts and regulators, while well intended to keep people safe from disease exposure, threatened other vital aspects of health and well-being. Furthermore, focusing narrowly on infection control practices does not address longstanding operational and infrastructural factors that contributed significantly to the pandemic toll. In this article, we review traditional (ie institutional) long-term care practices that were associated with increased risk during the pandemic and highlight one transformational model (the Green House Project) that worked well to protect the lives and livelihood of people within congregate care settings. Drawing on this evidence, we identify specific strategies for necessary and overdue improvements in long-term care homes.

O2-07-04: DESIGNING FOR DEMENTIA: THE IMPACT OF INTERACTIVE AMBIENT TECHNOLOGY ON WELL-BEING IN LONG-TERM CARE HOMES

2006 ◽  
Vol 14 (7S_Part_11) ◽  
pp. P636-P636
Author(s):  
Andrea Wilkinson ◽  
Mark Chignell ◽  
Marc Kanik ◽  
Judy O'Neill
Keyword(s):  
Long Term Care ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Care Homes ◽  
Term Care ◽  
The Impact

Perceptions of family and staff on the role of the environment in long-term care homes for people with dementia

2012 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 753-765 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda J. Garcia ◽  
Michèle Hébert ◽  
Jean Kozak ◽  
Isabelle Sénécal ◽  
Susan E. Slaughter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Focus Groups ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Disruptive Behaviors ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Care Homes ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Staff Members

ABSTRACTBackground: Disruptive behaviors are frequent and often the first predictor of institutionalization. The goal of this multi-center study was to explore the perceptions of family and staff members on the potential contribution of environmental factors that influence disruptive behaviors and quality of life of residents with dementia living in long-term care homes.Methods: Data were collected using 15 nominal focus groups with 45 family and 59 staff members from eight care units. Groups discussed and created lists of factors that could either reduce disruptive behaviors and facilitate quality of life or encourage disruptive behaviors and impede the quality of life of residents. Then each participant individually selected the nine most important facilitators and obstacles. Themes were identified from the lists of data and operational categories and definitions were developed for independent coding by four researchers.Results: Participants from both family and staff nominal focus groups highlighted facility, staffing, and resident factors to consider when creating optimal environments. Human environments were perceived to be more important than physical environments and flexibility was judged to be essential. Noise was identified as one of the most important factors influencing behavior and quality of life of residents.Conclusion: Specialized physical design features can be useful for maintaining quality of life and reducing disruptive behaviors, but they are not sufficient. Although they can ease some of the anxieties and set the stage for social interactions, individuals who make up the human environment are just as important in promoting well-being among residents.

scholarly journals NEW MODELS OF CARE FOR LONG-TERM CARE FACILITIES: WHAT DOES THE EVIDENCE TELL US?

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S242-S243
Author(s):  
Katie Brittain ◽  
Dawn Craig ◽  
Karen Spilsbury ◽  
Paul Wilson ◽  
Katie Brittain ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Long Term Care ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Models Of Care ◽  
Care Homes ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Ageing Population ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Care Facilities ◽  
New Models

Abstract Models of care are evolving to meet the demands of an ageing population in long-term care facilities. Syntheses of current evidence are an essential to inform future change. In this project we conducted a rapid synthesis of evidence relating to enhancing health in long term care facilities across technology and evaluation. Mapping reviews were conducted on the uses, benefits and challenges of technology in care homes and approaches to evaluation of new models of care. Systematic evidence syntheses addressed the questions of which technologies have a positive impact on resident health and well-being and which measurement tools have been validated for use in UK care homes. Key findings will be presented in animated format, including that the most promising interventions appear to be games that promote physical activity and enhance mental health. This presentation will highlight the benefits and importance of evidence synthesis to the development of models of care.

scholarly journals 804. Infection Control and Clinical Support in Long-Term Care Homes During the COVID-19 Pandemic in North Toronto: A Quasi-Experimental Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S496-S497
Author(s):  
Maria M Magaz ◽  
Jaclyn O’Brien ◽  
Victoria R Williams ◽  
Christina Chan ◽  
Adrienne Chan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Infection Control ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Case Fatality ◽  
Care Homes ◽  
Protective Equipment ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Environmental Cleaning ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Congregate Care

Abstract Background Wave one of the COVID-19 pandemic in Ontario, Canada, resulted in significant institutional outbreaks associated with high case fatality among older adults. Our hospital formally partnered with congregate care homes in north Toronto to support infection control and clinical management before wave two of the COVID-19 pandemic. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of this program on resident and healthcare worker (HCW) outcomes. Methods A multicentre quasi-experimental study was conducted comparing outcomes between wave one (March-June, 2020) and wave two (October-December, 2020) among 17 congregate care homes (4 long term care homes and 13 residential homes). During wave two, weekly meetings and 42 on-site visits were conducted along with on-site daily hospital presence for all COVID-19 outbreaks to support infection control and resident management. The primary outcomes included COVID-19-case fatality rate as well as overall resident fatality including COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 related causes. Secondary outcomes included healthcare worker COVID-19 infections, and infection control practices among homes with paired audits (n=6), including hand hygiene, use of personal protective equipment, environmental cleaning and physical distancing practices. Results Among 2203 residents during wave one and 2287 residents during wave two, there was reduction in COVID-19 case fatality rate (38.1% vs. 13.4%; p< 0.01), overall COVID-19-related fatality (2.3% vs. 1.0%; p< 0.01) and non COVID-19 related fatality (8.3% vs. 3.5%; p< 0.01). Weekly staff testing and increased syndromic surveillance was implemented during wave two. Among 2590 staff, there were 2.6% vs.4.2% staff who tested positive for COVID-19 during wave one and two, respectively. Changes in infection control practice were observed in regard to directly observed hand hygiene (83.3% vs. 100%), use of personal protective equipment (16.7% vs. 83.3%), environmental cleaning (66.7% vs. 100%) and physical distancing (66.7% vs. 83.3%). Conclusion Integration of hospital with community congregate care homes was associated with improvements in resident outcomes during wave two of the pandemic. Further longitudinal support and evaluation is needed to ensure sustainability. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Infection Control Programs in Long-Term-Care Facilities: Structure and Process

1999 ◽  
Vol 20 (11) ◽  
pp. 764-769 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara A. Goldrick
Keyword(s):  
Infection Control ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Skilled Nursing ◽  
Healthcare Facilities ◽  
Control Programs ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Care Facilities ◽  
Rapid Transfer

AbstractDue to the rapid transfer of patients from the acute-care setting, the intensity of nursing care among residents in long-term-care facilities (LTCFs) has increased, transforming today's LTCFs into subacute healthcare facilities. Given the increased risk of infection among residents in LTCFs and the associated morbidity and mortality, evaluation of infection control programs in skilled nursing LTCFs is warranted. This article addresses the current structure and process of infection control programs in skilled nursing LTCFs.

Social Connectivity in the Context of COVID-19 and Long-Term Care

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 410-410
Author(s):  
Anna Garnett ◽  
Hannah Pollock ◽  
Natalie Floriancic ◽  
Lorie Donelle ◽  
Yolanda Babenko-Mould ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Social Connectedness ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Qualitative Content Analysis ◽  
Family Members ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Care Homes ◽  
Health Providers ◽  
Term Care

Abstract The COVID-19 pandemic has disproportionately impacted older adults, particularly those residing in long-term care homes (LTCHs), causing immense loss of life and resulting in overall health declines in LTCH residents. These vulnerable older adults have also experienced extreme loneliness, anxiety and depression. Social connectedness is an important contributor to well-being and quality of life of older adults in LTCHs and family members are an essential component to this. However, restrictions driven by policies to protect resident safety, have constrained family members’ access to long-term care homes and limited in-person contact between residents and their families. In their absence, health providers have been integral to supporting connections between residents and their families within LTCHs. This study aimed to understand the experiences of social connectedness between residents and family members who have been physically separated due to the current pandemic and, to examine LTCH health providers’ experiences and responses to support social connectedness. Using a qualitative descriptive design, in-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with 21 family members and 11 healthcare providers. Emergent themes from qualitative content analysis are: (a) all-encompassing impacts of separation; (b) advocacy became my life; (c) the emotional toll of the unknown; 4) the burden of information translation; 5) precarious balance between safety and mistrust for the healthcare system; and (d) a formulaic approach impedes connectivity. A more comprehensive understanding of the experiences and support needs of LTCH residents and their family members within the context of a pandemic can inform practice approaches to support social connections going forwards.

scholarly journals Mental well‐being of staff in long‐term care facilities at risk

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chiaki Ura ◽  
Tsuyoshi Okamura ◽  
Akinori Takase ◽  
Masaya Shimmei ◽  
Yukan Ogawa
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Care Facilities ◽  
Mental Well Being

scholarly journals Digital Technologies To Enhance Social Connectedness in Long-Term Care Facilities During COVID-19: A Review

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 942-943
Author(s):  
Shannon Freeman ◽  
Aderonke Abgoji ◽  
Alanna Koopmans ◽  
Christopher Ross
Keyword(s):  
Social Isolation ◽  
Rural Areas ◽  
Social Connectedness ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Care Facility ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Sufficient Information ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Care Facilities

Abstract A consequence of the strict visitor restrictions implemented by many Long-term Care Facilities (LTCFs), during the COVID-19 pandemic, was the exacerbation of loneliness and social isolation felt by older adult residents. While there had been a shift by some persons to utilize digital solutions to mitigate the effects of the imposed social isolation, many facilities did not have sufficient information regarding available solutions to implement institutional strategies to support social connectedness through digital solutions. To support our partners in evidence-based policy-making we conducted a scoping review to identify existing virtual technology solutions, apps, and platforms feasible to promote social connectedness among persons residing in a long-term care facility context during times of lockdown such as experienced during the COVID-19 pandemic. Initial identification of relevant literature involved a combination of keywords and subject headings searches within 5 databases (PubMed, CINAHL EBSCO, PsychINFO EBSCO, Embase OVIDSP, and Web of Science ISI). DistillerSR was used to screen, chart and summarize the data. There is growth in the availability of technologies focused on promoting health and well-being in later life for persons in long-term care facilities however a gap remains in widespread uptake. We will describe the breadth of technologies identified in this review and discuss how they vary in utility in smaller scale facilities common in rural areas. Of the technologies that can be used to mitigate the impacts of social isolation felt by long-term care residents, many “solutions” depend on stable highspeed internet, which remains a challenge in rural and northern areas.

scholarly journals Informal carer in Portugal: moving towards political recognition in Portugal

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (Supplement_4) ◽  
Author(s):  
I Fronteira ◽  
J Simoes ◽  
G Augusto
Keyword(s):  
Informal Care ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Oecd Countries ◽  
Low Fertility ◽  
Informal Carer ◽  
Term Care ◽  
System Perspective ◽  
Informal Carers

Abstract Informal care represents around 80% of all long term care provided in EU countries. Nevertheless, the needs for this type of care are expected to increase in the coming years in all OECD countries. Portugal is among the OECD countries with the highest ageing index (21.5% of the population was older than 65 years in 2017) due to high life expectancy and low fertility rates. As this demographic trend establishes, Portugal is expected to have more than 40% of the population over 65 years in 2037, and the expected prevalence of dementia is 3%, in 2050. In 2015 there were 2.1% of people over 65 receiving long-term care, representing 52% of all long-term care users. Around 38% were receiving care at home. It is estimated that 287,000 people in Portugal depend on informal carers. The agenda towards the official recognition of informal cares has been push forward in the country. Since 2015, several recommendations have been issued by the Parliament as well as legislative initiatives and a proposal for a Status of the Informal Carer is currently under discussion. We analyse the process of formulation of this policy in terms of sectors and stakeholders involved, definition and scope of informal carer, rights and obligations, role of the person being cared for, formal protection (e.g., labor, social, financial, training) and implementation. Recognition of the informal carer is a sector wide approach. One of the main features is the economic, social and labor protection mainly through reconciliation between work life and caring activities and promotion of the carer’s well being. Notwithstanding, and from a health system perspective, community health teams are to be the focal point for informal carers, supporting and providing specific training whenever needed. Despite its relevance, informal care should not be professionalized and responsibility of care should not be shifted from health services to informal carers. Key messages Needs for informal care are expected to increase in the coming years in OECD countries. Recognition of the informal carer is a sector wide approach.

scholarly journals Online Opioid Stewardship Training for Long-Term Care Staff

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 533-533
Author(s):  
Linda Edelman ◽  
Troy Andersen ◽  
Cherie Brunker ◽  
Nicholas Cox ◽  
Jorie Butler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staff Training ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Care Staff ◽  
Video Content ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Pain Management Strategy

Abstract Opioids are often the first-line chronic pain management strategy for long-term care (LTC) residents who are also at increased risk for opioid-related adverse events. Therefore, there is a need to train LTC providers and staff about appropriate opioid use and alternative treatment strategies. Our interdisciplinary team worked with LTC partners to identify staff educational needs around opioid stewardship. Based on this need’s assessment, we developed eight modules about opioid use and risks for older adults, including those with dementia, recommendations for de-prescribing including other pharmacological and non-pharmacological alternatives, SBIRT, and motivational interviewing to determine “what matters”. Each 20-minute module contains didactic and video content that is appropriate for group staff training or individuals and provides rural LTC facilities access to needed training in their home communities. Within the first month of launching online, the program received over 1100 hits and LTC partners are incorporating modules into clinical staff training schedules.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document