Measuring Scope of Practice Enactment Among Primary Care Registered Nurses

2021 ◽  
pp. 084456212110583
Author(s):  
Suzanne Braithwaite ◽  
Joan Tranmer ◽  
Rosemary Wilson ◽  
Joan Almost ◽  
Deborah Tregunno
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Registered Nurses ◽  
Care Setting ◽  
Primary Care Setting ◽  
Scope Of Practice ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Narrative Literature ◽  
Narrative Literature Review ◽  
Panel Review

Background Scope of practice enactment is poorly understood in the primary care setting. Purpose The following research objectives were addressed: (1) to revise and adapt the Actual Scope of Practice (ASCOP) questionnaire for use in the primary care setting, and (2) to determine internal consistency, construct validity, and sensitivity of the modified instrument. Methods To address the first objective, a narrative literature review and synthesis and an expert panel review was conducted. To address the second objective, a cross-sectional survey of 178 registered nurses who worked in primary care was conducted. Results The ASCOP, with few modifications, addressed key attributes of nursing scope of practice in the primary care setting. The modified instrument yielded acceptable alpha coefficients ranging from 0.66 to 0.91. Total mean score of 4.8 (SD  =  .67) suggests that registered nurses within interprofessional primary care teams almost always engage in activities reflected in the modified instrument. Conclusions The modified instrument is the first instrument validated to measure nursing scope of practice enactment in the primary care setting. Findings from this study support the use of the modified ASCOP questionnaire as a reliable and valid measure of scope of practice enactment among primary care registered nurses.

Risk factors for foot ulcers—A cross sectional survey from a primary care setting in Brazil

2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maira Sayuri Sakay Bortoletto ◽  
Selma Maffei de Andrade ◽  
Tiemi Matsuo ◽  
Maria do Carmo Lourenço Haddad ◽  
Alberto Durán González ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Care Setting ◽  
Primary Care Setting ◽  
Foot Ulcers ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional

scholarly journals The association between PaTz and improved palliative care in the primary care setting: a cross-sectional survey

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian Koper ◽  
H. Roeline W. Pasman ◽  
Annicka G. M. Van der Plas ◽  
Bart P. M. Schweitzer ◽  
Bregje D. Onwuteaka-Philipsen
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Care Setting ◽  
Primary Care Setting ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional

scholarly journals Management of COVID-19 ICU-survivors in primary care: - a narrative review

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
KFR Schmidt ◽  
J. Gensichen ◽  
S. Gehrke-Beck ◽  
R. P. Kosilek ◽  
F. Kühne ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Critical Illness ◽  
Care Setting ◽  
Primary Care Setting ◽  
Care Physician ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Narrative Literature ◽  
Key Issues ◽  
Narrative Literature Review

AbstractMany survivors of critical illness suffer from long-lasting physical, cognitive, and mental health sequelae. The number of affected patients is expected to markedly increase due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Many ICU survivors receive long-term care from a primary care physician. Hence, awareness and appropriate management of these sequelae is crucial. An interdisciplinary authorship team participated in a narrative literature review to identify key issues in managing COVID-19 ICU-survivors in primary care. The aim of this perspective paper is to synthesize important literature to understand and manage sequelae of critical illness due to COVID-19 in the primary care setting.

scholarly journals Risk factors for a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR in patients with common cold symptoms in a primary care setting – a retrospective analysis based on a joint documentation standard

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Johannes Just ◽  
Marie-Therese Puth ◽  
Felix Regenold ◽  
Klaus Weckbecker ◽  
Markus Bleckwenn
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Common Cold ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Care Setting ◽  
Primary Care Setting ◽  
False Negative ◽  
First Grade ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Policy Makers ◽  
Primary Care Patients

Abstract Background Combating the COVID-19 pandemic is a major challenge for health systems, citizens and policy makers worldwide. Early detection of affected patients within the large and heterogeneous group of patients with common cold symptoms is an important element of this effort, but often hindered by limited testing resources, false-negative test results and the lack of pathognomonic symptoms in COVID-19. Therefore, we aimed to identify anamnestic items with an increased/decreased odds ratio for a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR (CovPCR) result in a primary care setting. Methods We performed a multi-center cross-sectional cohort study on predictive clinical characteristics for a positive CovPCR over a period of 4 weeks in primary care patients in Germany. Results In total, 374 patients in 14 primary care centers received CovPCR and were included in this analysis. The median age was 44.0 (IQR: 31.0–59.0) and a fraction of 10.7% (n = 40) tested positive for COVID-19. Patients who reported anosmia had a higher odds ratio (OR: 4.54; 95%-CI: 1.51–13.67) for a positive test result while patients with a sore throat had a lower OR (OR: 0.33; 95%-CI: 0.11–0.97). Furthermore, patients who had a first grade contact with an infected persons and showed symptoms themselves also had an increased OR for positive testing (OR: 5.16; 95% CI: 1.72–15.51). This correlation was also present when they themselves were still asymptomatic (OR: 12.55; 95% CI: 3.97–39.67). Conclusions Several anamnestic criteria may be helpful to assess pre-test probability of COVID-19 in patients with common cold symptoms.

Increased Cardiovascular Disease in Patients with Inflammatory Arthritis in Primary Care: A Cross-sectional Observation: Table 1.

2009 ◽  
Vol 36 (9) ◽  
pp. 1866-1868 ◽  
Author(s):  
MIKE J.L. PETERS ◽  
MARK M.J. NIELEN ◽  
HENNIE G. RATERMAN ◽  
ROBERT A. VERHEIJ ◽  
FRANCOIS G. SCHELLEVIS ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Inflammatory Arthritis ◽  
Care Setting ◽  
Primary Care Setting ◽  
Conditional Logistic Regression ◽  
Regression Analyses ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Cardiovascular Risk Management ◽  
And Control

Objective.To compare the prevalence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in patients with inflammatory arthritis and control subjects registered in primary care.Methods.Conditional logistic regression analyses were used to compare the CVD prevalence in patients and controls, aged 50–75 years.Results.Overall, the CVD prevalence was 66.1 per 1000 patients in inflammatory arthritis and 37.3 per 1000 patients in controls, resulting in an odds ratio of 1.83 (95% confidence interval 1.33–2.51).Conclusion.Inflammatory arthritis patients registered in primary care are associated with an increased cardiovascular burden, which emphasizes the need for cardiovascular risk management in the primary care setting.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document