The Research to Practice Projects: Lessons Learned About Changing Teacher Practice

Author(s):  
Daniel J. Boudah ◽  
Kent R. Logan ◽  
Cbarles R. Greenwood
2008 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 317-325 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheree L. Toth ◽  
Jody Todd Manly ◽  
Wendy J. Nilsen

2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 233-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. R. Lopez-Patton ◽  
◽  
S. M. Weiss ◽  
J. N. Tobin ◽  
D. L. Jones ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 171 ◽  
pp. e71-e72
Author(s):  
Kathryn Gilmore ◽  
Dace Svikis ◽  
Anne Rhodes ◽  
Thomas Moore ◽  
Lauren Yerkes

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Shusterman ◽  
Natalie May ◽  
Samantha Melvin ◽  
Sona Kumar ◽  
Stephanie Blumenstock ◽  
...  

As a field, developmental science has embarked on the serious work of translating research findings for use in real world settings, but much research from developmental scientists remains cloistered within university walls. This paper presents a framework for the translation of developmental science to practice, mostly in educational settings, articulating ten core principles for bridging the research-to-practice gap. The principles summarize the key lessons learned from two long-term research-to-practice translational projects: the development of an early childhood numeracy curriculum (the Wesleyan Preschool Math Project) and a research-based summer pre-K for low-income children (Kindergarten Kickstart). The principles (1. Understand the gap; 2. Invest in developing the intervention; 3. Appreciate the naturalistic, real-world context; 4. Maximize uptake, not just efficacy and effectiveness; 5. Acknowledge power and status differentials; 6. Collaborate; 7. Leverage resources; 8. Respect; 9. Practice iterative development; 10. Simplify the final product) reflect central tenets of community-engaged research and intervention design; we emphasize the importance of collaborating with community members; acknowledging power differentials between researchers and practitioners; respecting practitioners as experts in their own right with valuable insight into their classrooms; appreciating naturalistic context; and recognizing the motivations of end-users at every step of intervention design and development. The paper also includes strategies for researchers to maximize opportunities to translate research to practice, such as leveraging untapped resources and mobilizing undergraduate students. This paper is both a call to action and an initial blueprint for developmental scientists who are interested in translating more research into practice.


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 88-96
Author(s):  
Mary R. T. Kennedy

Purpose The purpose of this clinical focus article is to provide speech-language pathologists with a brief update of the evidence that provides possible explanations for our experiences while coaching college students with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Method The narrative text provides readers with lessons we learned as speech-language pathologists functioning as cognitive coaches to college students with TBI. This is not meant to be an exhaustive list, but rather to consider the recent scientific evidence that will help our understanding of how best to coach these college students. Conclusion Four lessons are described. Lesson 1 focuses on the value of self-reported responses to surveys, questionnaires, and interviews. Lesson 2 addresses the use of immediate/proximal goals as leverage for students to update their sense of self and how their abilities and disabilities may alter their more distal goals. Lesson 3 reminds us that teamwork is necessary to address the complex issues facing these students, which include their developmental stage, the sudden onset of trauma to the brain, and having to navigate going to college with a TBI. Lesson 4 focuses on the need for college students with TBI to learn how to self-advocate with instructors, family, and peers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document