Screening of Dementia in Stroke Patients With Lacunar Infarcts: Comparison of the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale and the Mini-Mental State Examination

2005 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wai Kwong Tang ◽  
Vincent Mok ◽  
Sandra S. M. Chan ◽  
Helen F. K. Chiu ◽  
Ka Sing Wong ◽  
...  
2002 ◽  
Vol 17 (7) ◽  
pp. 685-686 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Freidl ◽  
W.-J. Stronegger ◽  
A. Berghold ◽  
B. Reinhart ◽  
K. Petrovic ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 301-307 ◽  
Author(s):  
URSULA HOHL ◽  
MICHAEL GRUNDMAN ◽  
DAVID P. SALMON ◽  
RONALD G. THOMAS ◽  
LEON J. THAL

Little information exists regarding the performance of Spanish-speaking versus English-speaking patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) on the Mini-Mental State Examination and the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale. In an attempt to identify culturally biased MMSE items or DRS subscales, we matched Spanish-speaking Hispanic and English-speaking non-Hispanic White community-dwelling AD patients by their MMSE scores and examined specific items within each scale. Our findings indicate that Hispanic AD patients perform significantly worse than non-Hispanics in terms of total DRS score, scores on the DRS subscales for Conceptualization and Memory, and on serial subtraction (or backward spelling item) of the MMSE. While mildly to moderately demented Hispanic and non-Hispanic patients obtained comparable scores on the DRS, severely impaired Spanish-speaking participants obtained considerably lower DRS scores than their English-speaking counterparts. The discrepancy in the DRS scores of the severely impaired Hispanic and non-Hispanic examinees might reflect a cultural bias in the test or educational differences between the groups. Alternatively, the DRS may be more sensitive than the MMSE for detecting severe cognitive impairment in Hispanic patients. (JINS, 1999, 5, 301–307.)


2009 ◽  
Vol 5 (4S_Part_10) ◽  
pp. P292-P292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hee Jin Kang ◽  
Young-Hee Chang ◽  
Ha-Ry Na ◽  
Min Jae Baek ◽  
Hyun Jung Kim ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 350-353 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jefferson C Folquitto ◽  
Sonia E Z Bustamante ◽  
Sérgio B Barros ◽  
Dionisio Azevedo ◽  
Marcos A Lopes ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the applicability of the Bayer - Activities of Daily Living scale and its efficiency in differentiating individuals with mild to moderate dementia from normal elderly controls. METHOD: We selected 33 patients with diagnosis of mild to severe dementia, according to ICD-10 criteria, and 59 controls. All the subjects were evaluated with the Mini-Mental State Examination and the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale and the Bayer - Activities of Daily Living scale was applied to informants. RESULTS: The internal consistency of the Bayer - Activities of Daily Living was high (Cronbach's alpha = 0.981). Mean Mini-Mental State Examination and Bayer - Activities of Daily Living scores of demented patients and controls were significantly different (p < 0.001). Mean Mini-Mental State Examination and Bayer - Activities of Daily Living scores were significantly different between Clinical Dementia Rating Scale 0 (controls; n = 59) versus Clinical Dementia Rating Scale 1 (mild dementia; n = 15), Clinical Dementia Rating Scale 0 versus Clinical Dementia Rating Scale 2 (moderate dementia; n = 13), and for Clinical Dementia Rating Scale 1 versus Clinical Dementia Rating Scale 2 (p < 0.003). DISCUSSION: The Bayer - Activities of Daily Living scale and Mini-Mental State Examination differentiated elderly controls from patients with mild or moderate dementia, and patients with mild dementia from those with moderate dementia. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the Bayer - Activities of Daily Living scale applied to an informant can help in the diagnosis and follow-up of Brazilian patients with mild to moderate dementia.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document