scholarly journals P2-103: Korean version of Mini-Mental State Examination and Clinical Dementia Rating Scale Sum of Boxes scores in staging the dementia

2009 ◽  
Vol 5 (4S_Part_10) ◽  
pp. P292-P292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hee Jin Kang ◽  
Young-Hee Chang ◽  
Ha-Ry Na ◽  
Min Jae Baek ◽  
Hyun Jung Kim ◽  
...  
2007 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 350-353 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jefferson C Folquitto ◽  
Sonia E Z Bustamante ◽  
Sérgio B Barros ◽  
Dionisio Azevedo ◽  
Marcos A Lopes ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the applicability of the Bayer - Activities of Daily Living scale and its efficiency in differentiating individuals with mild to moderate dementia from normal elderly controls. METHOD: We selected 33 patients with diagnosis of mild to severe dementia, according to ICD-10 criteria, and 59 controls. All the subjects were evaluated with the Mini-Mental State Examination and the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale and the Bayer - Activities of Daily Living scale was applied to informants. RESULTS: The internal consistency of the Bayer - Activities of Daily Living was high (Cronbach's alpha = 0.981). Mean Mini-Mental State Examination and Bayer - Activities of Daily Living scores of demented patients and controls were significantly different (p < 0.001). Mean Mini-Mental State Examination and Bayer - Activities of Daily Living scores were significantly different between Clinical Dementia Rating Scale 0 (controls; n = 59) versus Clinical Dementia Rating Scale 1 (mild dementia; n = 15), Clinical Dementia Rating Scale 0 versus Clinical Dementia Rating Scale 2 (moderate dementia; n = 13), and for Clinical Dementia Rating Scale 1 versus Clinical Dementia Rating Scale 2 (p < 0.003). DISCUSSION: The Bayer - Activities of Daily Living scale and Mini-Mental State Examination differentiated elderly controls from patients with mild or moderate dementia, and patients with mild dementia from those with moderate dementia. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the Bayer - Activities of Daily Living scale applied to an informant can help in the diagnosis and follow-up of Brazilian patients with mild to moderate dementia.


2002 ◽  
Vol 17 (7) ◽  
pp. 685-686 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Freidl ◽  
W.-J. Stronegger ◽  
A. Berghold ◽  
B. Reinhart ◽  
K. Petrovic ◽  
...  

Neurology ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 57 (3) ◽  
pp. 481-488 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. C. Mohs ◽  
R. S. Doody ◽  
J.C. Morris ◽  
J. R. Ieni ◽  
S. L. Rogers ◽  
...  

Objective: To examine the effects of donepezil compared with placebo on the preservation of function in patients with AD over a 1-year period.Methods: This was a prospective, 54-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, survival to endpoint study. Patients were required to have at entry: a diagnosis of probable AD (National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke criteria); Mini-Mental State Examination score of 12 to 20; Clinical Dementia Rating of 1 or 2; modified Hachinski ischemia score ≤4; and capability of performing 8 of 10 instrumental activities of daily living and 5 of 6 basic activities of daily living. Patients (n = 431) were randomized to placebo or donepezil (5 mg/day for 28 days, 10 mg/day thereafter). Outcome measures were the AD Functional Assessment and Change Scale, the Mini-Mental State Examination, and Clinical Dementia Rating scale. At each visit, investigators determined whether predefined criteria for clinically evident decline in functional status had been met. Patients who met the endpoint criteria were discontinued per protocol.Results: Donepezil extended the median time to clinically evident functional decline by 5 months versus placebo. The probability of patients treated with donepezil remaining in the study with no clinically evident functional loss was 51% at 48 weeks, compared with 35% for placebo. The Kaplan–Meier survival curves for the two treatment groups were different (p = 0.002, log-rank test).Conclusions: Patients with AD continue to show detectable disease progression over time, but treatment with donepezil for 1 year was associated with a 38% reduction in the risk of functional decline compared with placebo.


1999 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 301-307 ◽  
Author(s):  
URSULA HOHL ◽  
MICHAEL GRUNDMAN ◽  
DAVID P. SALMON ◽  
RONALD G. THOMAS ◽  
LEON J. THAL

Little information exists regarding the performance of Spanish-speaking versus English-speaking patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) on the Mini-Mental State Examination and the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale. In an attempt to identify culturally biased MMSE items or DRS subscales, we matched Spanish-speaking Hispanic and English-speaking non-Hispanic White community-dwelling AD patients by their MMSE scores and examined specific items within each scale. Our findings indicate that Hispanic AD patients perform significantly worse than non-Hispanics in terms of total DRS score, scores on the DRS subscales for Conceptualization and Memory, and on serial subtraction (or backward spelling item) of the MMSE. While mildly to moderately demented Hispanic and non-Hispanic patients obtained comparable scores on the DRS, severely impaired Spanish-speaking participants obtained considerably lower DRS scores than their English-speaking counterparts. The discrepancy in the DRS scores of the severely impaired Hispanic and non-Hispanic examinees might reflect a cultural bias in the test or educational differences between the groups. Alternatively, the DRS may be more sensitive than the MMSE for detecting severe cognitive impairment in Hispanic patients. (JINS, 1999, 5, 301–307.)


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document