Sixth meeting of the European Forum on antiphospholipid antibodies. How to improve the understanding of the antiphospholipid syndrome?

Lupus ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ž Rotar ◽  
B Rozman ◽  
PG de Groot ◽  
M Sanmarco ◽  
Y Shoenfeld ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antiphospholipid Syndrome ◽  
Antiphospholipid Antibodies ◽  
European Forum

The Ped-APS Registry: the antiphospholipid syndrome in childhood

Lupus ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 18 (10) ◽  
pp. 894-899 ◽  
Author(s):  
T Avčin ◽  
R Cimaz ◽  
B Rozman ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Antiphospholipid Syndrome ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Antiphospholipid Antibodies ◽  
Clinical Laboratory ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Juvenile Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Collaborative Project ◽  
European Forum ◽  
International Registry ◽  
Low Prevalence

In recent years, antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) has been increasingly recognised in various paediatric autoimmune and nonautoimmune diseases, but the relatively low prevalence and heterogeneity of APS in childhood made it very difficult to study in a systematic way. The project of an international registry of paediatric patients with APS (the Ped-APS Registry) was initiated in 2004 to foster and conduct multicentre, controlled studies with large number of paediatric APS patients. The Ped-APS Registry is organised as a collaborative project of the European Forum on Antiphospholipid Antibodies and Juvenile Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Working Group of the Paediatric Rheumatology European Society. Currently, it documents a standardised clinical, laboratory and therapeutic data of 133 children with antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL)-related thrombosis from 14 countries. The priority projects for future research of the Ped-APS Registry include prospective enrolment of new patients with aPL-related thrombosis, assessment of differences between the paediatric and adult APS, evaluation of proinflammatory genotype as a risk factor for APS manifestations in childhood and evaluation of patients with isolated nonthrombotic aPL-related manifestations.

Summary of the 12th Meeting of the European Forum on antiphospholipid antibodies ONLINE

Lupus ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 096120332110550
Author(s):  
Aleksandra Djokovic ◽  
Ljudmila Stojanovich
Keyword(s):  
Antiphospholipid Syndrome ◽  
Antiphospholipid Antibodies ◽  
Research Projects ◽  
Online Forum ◽  
Interactive Communication ◽  
European Forum ◽  
Digital Format ◽  
Set Up ◽  
New Research ◽  
First Time

As a result of the current COVID-19 pandemic, the 12th meeting of the European Forum on Antiphospholipid Antibodies was held in a digital format on 26th March 2021. Even experienced for the first time in a virtual set-up, it kept its strength in continuation of the opportunity for more than 200 physicians from all continents and 20 countries to meet the experts in the field. Contemporary research in the area of antiphospholipid syndrome was presented, and proposals for the new research projects, as a distinguishing feature of the meeting, made a major contribution. Despite challenging times, this meeting enabled the highest number of registered participants to have interactive communication with presenters. This report summarizes major studies and new research projects presented during the online forum meeting.

European attempts for the standardisation of the antiphospholipid antibodies

Lupus ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 18 (10) ◽  
pp. 913-919 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Tincani ◽  
M Filippini ◽  
M Scarsi ◽  
M Galli ◽  
PL Meroni
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Criteria ◽  
Antiphospholipid Syndrome ◽  
Diagnostic Tests ◽  
Antiphospholipid Antibodies ◽  
Lupus Anticoagulant ◽  
Functional Assay ◽  
European Forum ◽  
Glycoprotein I ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Major Target

According to the Sydney criteria, antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) diagnosis is closely related to the demonstration of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) in patients sera. For this purpose, three different assays are conventionally accepted: lupus anticoagulant (LA), anticardiolipin (aCL) and anti-β2 glycoprotein I (β2GPI) antibodies. LA, described in the 1950s is a coagulation-based functional assay, which indirectly detects the presence of aPL. The aCL ELISA was developed in 1985; the identification of β2GPI as a major target of aPL, allowed the introduction of anti-β2GPI ELISA. Even if the diagnostic criteria for APS have been well defined, the laboratory detection of aPL is not always reproducible for many reasons. To achieve a univocal diagnostic definition of APS, efforts were made to reduce the inter- and/or intra-laboratory variability of the diagnostic tests. In this article, we analyse the studies performed to standardise aPL assays that were developed within the European Forum on Antiphospholipid Antibodies.

The clinical relevance of isolated lupus anticoagulant positivity in patients with thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong-mei Yin ◽  
Philip de Groot ◽  
Marisa Ninivaggi ◽  
Katrien M.J. Devreese ◽  
Bas de Laat
Keyword(s):  
Antiphospholipid Syndrome ◽  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Antiphospholipid Antibodies ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Lupus Anticoagulant ◽  
Solid Phase ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Domain I ◽  
Normal Controls ◽  
Better Than

Background: Patients positive for three types of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) (triple positivity) have been identified at a high risk for thrombotic events. However, the clinical significance of isolated lupus anticoagulant (LAC) positivity is debated. Objectives: To investigate the clinical relevance of isolated LAC. Patients/Methods 456 patients were enrolled in this study; 66 antiphospholipid syndrome patients and 390 control patients. The control group existed of autoimmune patients (n=91), patients with thrombosis but without aPLs (n=127) and normal controls (n=172). The criteria LAC, anti-cardiolipin (anti-CL) and anti-beta2glycoprotein I (anti-β2GPI) IgG and IgM and the non-criteria IgA anti-CL and anti-β2GPI, anti-domain I (anti-DI) of β2GPI IgG and anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin (anti-PS/PT) IgG and IgM were detected according to the ISTH guidelines for solid phase assays. Results: 70 patients were positive for LAC, of which 44 were negative for both anti-β2GPI and anti-CL. We found that isolated LAC proved to be strongly associated with vascular thrombosis (Odds ratio (OR) (95% CI) 7.3 (3.3-16.1)), even better than triple positive samples (OR 4.3 (1.6-12.2)). The titers of the anti-PS/PT IgG and IgM were significantly higher in triple positivity samples compared to samples with isolated LAC positivity. The majority of single LAC positives were anti-PS/PT negative. We observed that LAC positivity was weaker in isolated LAC positive patients compared to LAC activity in triple positive patients. Conclusions: Isolated LAC was highly associated with thrombosis. The presence of anti-PS/PT could not explain LAC positivity in isolated LAC. Isolated LAC showed a weaker LAC activity compared to triple positive patients.

scholarly journals POS0712 “EXTRA”- CRITERIA ANTIPHOSPHOLIPID ANTIBODIES IN PATIENTS WITH ANTIPHOSPHOLIPID SYNDROME AND SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS (PRELIMINARY DATA)

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 605.2-606
Author(s):  
F. Cheldieva ◽  
T. Reshetnyak ◽  
M. Cherkasova ◽  
N. Seredavkina ◽  
A. Lila
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Antiphospholipid Syndrome ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Preliminary Data ◽  
Antiphospholipid Antibodies ◽  
Disease Duration ◽  
Past History ◽  
Igg Antibodies ◽  
Systemic Lupus ◽  
Pregnancy Morbidity

Background:The study of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL), not included in the Sydney diagnostic criteria, in antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is poorly understood.Objectives:To determine the frequency of detection of IgA-aCL and IgA-aβ2GP1 and IgG antibodies to β2GP1 domain 1 (IgG-aβ2GP1-D1) in patients with APS with and without SLE.Methods:ELISA and chemiluminescence assays (CMA) were used to test 63 sera of patients: 22 (35%) with primary APS (pAPS) and 41 (65%) patients with APS and with SLE (secondary APS (sAPS)), with mean age 38,0 [33,0 – 43,0] years and disease duration 4,0 [0,1 – 9,9]. Both methods were used to test of IgG/IgM-aCL and IgG/IgM-aβ2GP1. CMA was used for research IgG/IgM/IgA-aCL, IgG/IgM/IgA-aβ2GPI and IgG-aβ2GP1-D1. Of them 49 (78%) (18 – with pAPS; 31 – with sAPS) displayed major thrombotic events and 18 of 22 pregnant women had pregnancy morbidity in past history. Lupus anticoagulant (LA) positivity was in 9 out of 12 patients who had it determined. LA was not investigated due to anticoagulant therapy in the remaining 52 patients.Results:IgG/IgM-aCL and IgG/IgM-aß2GP1 were recorded in 44/18 and 50/17 patients by ELISA and in 55/19 and 59/16 by CMA, respectively.IgA-aCL positivity was found in 35 (56%) of 63 patients. Thirty IgA-positive patients were positive for IgG-aCL by ELISA: 22 – IgG-aCL – highly positive, 6 – medium positive and 2 – low positive patients. IgM-aCL by ELISA was detected in 13 (37%) of 35 IgA-aCL positive patients: 11 – highly positive, 1 – medium positive and 1 – low positive. IgA-aCL was combined with IgG-aCL in 34 patients and with IgM-aCL in 16 patients in the CMA. IgG-aß2GP1 in ELISA was detected in 32 patients with IgA-aCL (24 –highly positive, 5 – medium positive and 3 – low positive) and in 34 – in CMA. IgM-aß2GP1 was combined with IgA-aß2GP1 with the same frequency in both methods (in 13 patients).IgA-aß2GP1 was detected in 30 (48%) of 63 patients. They were combined with both IgG-aCL and IgG-aß2GP1 in all cases in both methods. IgM-aCL and IgM-aß2GP1 were detected in 14 and 11 of 30 patients with IgA-aß2GP1, respectively. The combination of IgA-aß2GP1 with IgG-aCL by ELISA was in 27 (in most cases highly positive – 20) and with IgM-aCL – in 10 (highly positive - 8). IgG-aß2GP1 was detected in 28 patients with IgA-aß2GP1 (high positive – 21) and in 11 patients with IgM-aß2GP1 (high positive –7).IgG-aß2GP1-D1 was revealed in 48 (76%) patients. It was combined with IgG-aCL – in 38, with IgM-aCL – in 15 patients by the ELISA. The combination of IgG-aß2GP1-D1 by CMA was as follows: with IgG-aCL – in 46, with IgM-aCL – in 17, and with IgA-aCL – in 33 patients. In most cases, IgG-aß2gp1-D1 was combined with highly positive aCL levels. IgG-aß2GP1-D1 positivity was associated with IgG-aß2GP1 positivity in 42 – by ELISA and 47 – by CMA, IgМ-aβ2GP1 – in 13 and 14 patients by ELISA and CMA, respectively, and IgA-aß2GP1 – in 29. Isolated IgG-aß2GP1-D1 positivity was not observed.Conclusion:The frequency of IgA-aCL detection was 56% (35 patients out of 63), IgA-aβ2GP1 – 48% (30 patients out of 63), IgG-aβ2GP1-D1 – 76% (48 patients out of 63). There was not isolated positivity of this “extra” criterial antibodies. The presence of IgA-aCL, IgA-aβ2GP1, IgG-aβ2GP1-D1 was associated with highly positivity of IgG/IgM-aCL and IgG/IgM- aβ2GP1.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document