scholarly journals Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus

2012 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 855-866 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kerstin Wernike ◽  
Paolo Bonilauri ◽  
Malte Dauber ◽  
Jane Errington ◽  
Neil LeBlanc ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Respiratory Syndrome Virus ◽  
Analytical Sensitivity ◽  
Negative Results ◽  
False Negative Results ◽  
Ring Trial ◽  
Polymerase Chain ◽  
Commercial Kits ◽  
The Individual

To compare the real-time reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) assays used for the diagnosis of Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV), a Europe-wide interlaboratory ring trial was conducted. A variety of PRRSV strains including North American (NA) and European (EU) genotype isolates were analyzed by the participants. Great differences regarding qualitative diagnostics as well as analytical sensitivity were observed between the individual RT-qPCR systems, especially when investigating strains from the EU genotype. None of the assays or commercial kits used in the ring trial could identify all different PRRSV strains with an optimal analytical and diagnostic sensitivity. The genetic variability of the PRRSV strains, which is supposed to hinder the diagnostic of the RT-PCR because of mutations at the primer binding sites, was also confirmed by sequencing and subsequent phylogenetic analysis. In summary, a major problem in PRRSV diagnostics by RT-qPCR is false-negative results. To achieve maximum safety in the molecular diagnosis of PRRSV, the combined usage of different assays or kits is highly recommended.

scholarly journals Detection of LytA Genes in Streptococcus pneumoniae Isolated from sputum pneumonia patients

Biomedika ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-30
Author(s):  
Mustika Sari Hutabarat ◽  
Firdaus Hamid ◽  
Irawaty Djaharuddin ◽  
Alfian Zainuddin ◽  
Rossana Agus ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Streptococcus Pneumoniae ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Pneumococcal Infection ◽  
Diagnostic Methods ◽  
Molecular Diagnostic ◽  
Clinical Samples ◽  
Biochemical Tests ◽  
Negative Results ◽  
False Negative Results ◽  
Polymerase Chain

Streptococcus pneumoniae (pneumococcus) is a Gram-positive facultative anaerobic bacterium that is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. But the lack of reporting of disease by this bacterium in Indonesia, one of the causes is because the diagnosis of pneumococcal infection is often clinically not typical and conventional methods which are still the standard gold method often give false-negative results. So the purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of culture and molecular diagnostic methods using the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) technique in detecting Streptococcus pneumoniae in sputum clinical samples using the Autolysin (LytA) gene which is a virulence factor of this bacterium. 57 isolates from 60 samples were confirmed as Streptococcus sp through microscopic identification, culture, and biochemical tests. Then the sensitivity test with an optochin test of 9 (9%) compared the results descriptively with the PCR technique using the Autolysin A (LytA) gene which was obtained more sensitive by 15 (25%).

scholarly journals Essais interlaboratoires pour l'identification moléculaire des espèces paléarctiques du sous-genre Avaritia

2009 ◽  
Vol 62 (2-4) ◽  
pp. 102
Author(s):  
Catherine Cetre-Sossah ◽  
Thomas Balenghien ◽  
Jean-Claude Delécolle ◽  
Rudolf Meiswinkel
Keyword(s):  
Deoxyribonucleic Acid ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Chain Reaction ◽  
Negative Results ◽  
False Negative Results ◽  
Ring Trial ◽  
International Experts ◽  
Phosphate Buffered Saline ◽  
Excel File

A ring trial was conducted for molecular identification of Palaearctic species of the subgenus Avaritia, and especially the following four species: Culicoides chiopterus, C. dewulfi, C. obsoletus and C. scoticus. It was based on multiplex polymer­ase chain reaction (PCR) on the molecular markers cytochrome oxidase type 1 (CO1), internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS-2), and ITS-1. Each of the 13 participating laboratories (from seven dif­ferent countries) received on the 4th of August 2008 a panel of 38 samples of 11 μL of a phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) solu­tion containing parts of a single specimen of insect ground up into 200 μL of PBS, as well as four tubes, identified and men­tioned in the accompanying letter, for which deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) had already been extracted.  The panel was coded with a letter followed by different num­bers. The laboratories had two months from the date of arrival of the samples to give back the results by sending an Excel file containing the coding. The 38 samples used for the trial were exchanged for identification between two international experts (Drs J.C. Delécolle and R. Meiswinkel). Only one identification differed between the two experts: scoticus vs. obsoletus, and sequencing revealed it to be a C. scoticus specimen.  Only one laboratory used molecular marker ITS-2, five labo­ratories used ITS-1, and four used CO1. Only two found the expected results. The eight remaining laboratories found some false positive or false negative results. Five out of ten correctly identified the species from the DNA samples. Seven out of ten laboratories had 100% sensitivity

Prevalence of porA pseudogene deletion among Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates referred to the UK’s Gonococcal Resistance to Antimicrobials Surveillance Program

Sexual Health ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 392 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martina Toby ◽  
Pamela Saunders ◽  
Michelle Cole ◽  
Vlad Grigorjev ◽  
Sarah Alexander ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neisseria Gonorrhoeae ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Public Health Problem ◽  
Surveillance Program ◽  
Major Public Health Problem ◽  
Negative Results ◽  
False Negative Results ◽  
Confirmatory Tests ◽  
Polymerase Chain ◽  
Low Prevalence

porA pseudogene-negative Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates produce false-negative results when examined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with porA pseudogene targets. In the present study, 533 representative gonococcal isolates received in 2011 via the Gonococcal Resistance to Antimicrobials Surveillance Program were examined to determine the prevalence of porA-negative isolates. Less than 0.4% (2/533) of isolates were found to be reproducibly negative with the porA real-time PCR but were confirmed as N. gonorrhoeae with molecular, biochemical and immunological confirmatory tests. Sequencing revealed both isolates contained the Neisseria meningitidis porA gene. Low prevalence indicates that although these isolates do not present a major public health problem, microbiologists should remain vigilant.

scholarly journals The Use of a Mimic to Detect Polymerase Chain Reaction– Inhibitory Factors in Feces Examined for the Presence of Lawsonia Intracellularis

2003 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 268-273 ◽  
Author(s):  
Magdalena Jacobson ◽  
Stina Englund ◽  
András Ballagi-Pordány
Keyword(s):  
Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Clinical Samples ◽  
Lawsonia Intracellularis ◽  
Chain Reaction ◽  
Fecal Samples ◽  
Wild Boars ◽  
Negative Results ◽  
False Negative Results ◽  
Polymerase Chain

Lawsonia intracellularis is an intracellular organism that causes proliferative enteritis in pigs. This bacterium is difficult to culture, and antemortem demonstration of the microbe is therefore often performed on fecal samples by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Polymerase chain reaction is sensitive and specific, but inhibitory factors in feces might cause false-negative results. This article describes the construction and use of an internal standard, a mimic. The mimic is amplified by the same primers as those used for L. intracellularis DNA and thus could indicate false-negative results in clinical samples. The amplicon was clearly visible when as few as 10 mimic molecules were added per amplification reaction and when no inhibitors were present. When fecal samples were spiked with the mimic, the detection limit was 102 molecules per PCR. Sixty clinical samples, 20 from wild boars, 20 from growing pigs with diarrhea, and 20 from pigs without diarrhea, were prepared by a boiling procedure and subjected to PCR together with 103 mimic molecules. Nine samples were positive, of which 7 originated from pigs with diarrhea and 2 from pigs without diarrhea. In 14 samples from wild boars, in 8 samples from pigs without diarrhea, and in 3 samples from pigs with diarrhea, neither the mimic nor the target DNA was visible. This indicated the presence of inhibitors in these samples. It is concluded that the mimic can be used as an internal control in the diagnosis of L. intracellularis to indicate inhibition of PCR.

scholarly journals Reducing False Negative PCR Test for COVID-19

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 408-410
Author(s):  
Fatemeh Bahreini ◽  
Rezvan Najafi ◽  
Razieh Amini ◽  
Salman Khazaei ◽  
Saeid Bashirian
Keyword(s):  
Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Real Time ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Chain Reaction ◽  
Creative Commons ◽  
Negative Results ◽  
False Negative Results ◽  
Polymerase Chain ◽  
Pcr Test

As the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic spreads rapidly, there is need for a diagnostic test with high accuracy to detect infected individuals especially those without symptoms. Real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is a common molecular test for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2. If some factors are not taken into consideration when performing this test, it can have a relatively large number of false negative results. In this article, we discuss important considerations that could lead to false negative test reduction. Key words: • SARS-CoV-2 • COVID-19 • Real time polymerase chain reaction • RT-PCR test • Diagnosis • False negatives • Genetics • Emerging disease   Copyright © 2020 Bahreini et al. Published by Global Health and Education Projects, Inc. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0)which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in this journal, is properly cited.

scholarly journals False-Negative Nasopharyngeal Swab RT-PCR Assays in Typical COVID-19: Role of Ultra-low-dose Chest CT and Bronchoscopy in Diagnosis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Marando ◽  
Adriana Tamburello ◽  
Pietro Gianella
Keyword(s):  
Low Dose ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Nasopharyngeal Swab ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Oral Swab ◽  
Negative Results ◽  
False Negative Results ◽  
Polymerase Chain ◽  
Pcr Assays

On 11 March 2020, the WHO declared COVID-19 a pandemic and global health emergency. We describe the clinical features and role of ultra-low-dose chest computed tomography (CT) and bronchoscopy in the diagnosis of coronavirus disease (COVID-19). In our patient, who was highly suggestive clinically and radiologically for COVID-19, we had two false-negative results for nasopharyngeal and oral swab reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assays for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Eventually, we confirmed the diagnosis using bronchoscopy and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL).

scholarly journals Impact of false negative results of RT-PCR test for SARS-CoV-2 in COVID-19 case count as applied to Mexico

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isaac J. Núñez ◽  
Pablo F. Belaunzarán-Zamudio ◽  
Yanink Caro-Vega
Keyword(s):  
False Negative ◽  
Open Data ◽  
Clinical Samples ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Negative Results ◽  
Case Count ◽  
False Negative Results ◽  
True Number ◽  
High Prevalence ◽  
Polymerase Chain

Underestimation of the number of cases during the COVID-19 pandemic has been a constant concern worldwide. Case confirmation is based on identification of SARS-CoV-2 RNA using real time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in clinical samples. However, these tests have suboptimal sensitivity, especially during the early and late course of infection. Using open data, we estimated that among 1 343 730 people tested in Mexico since February 27th, there were 838 377 (95% CL 734 605 - 1 057 164) cases, compared with 604 376 considering only positive tests. ICU admissions and deaths were around 16% and 9% higher than reported. Thus, we show that accounting for the sensitivity of SARS-Cov-2 RT-PCR diagnostic tests is a simple way to improve estimations for the true number of COVID-19 cases in tested people, particularly in high-prevalence populations. This could aid to better inform public health measures and reopening policies.

scholarly journals SARS-CoV-2 E gene variant alters analytical sensitivity characteristics of viral detection using a commercial RT-PCR assay

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Tahan ◽  
Bijal A. Parikh ◽  
Lindsay Droit ◽  
Meghan A. Wallace ◽  
Carey-Ann D. Burnham ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Detection Efficiency ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Analytical Sensitivity ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Viral Detection ◽  
Public Health Response ◽  
The Public ◽  
E Gene ◽  
Negative Results ◽  
False Negative Results

Diagnostic assays for detecting SARS-CoV-2 are essential for patient management, infection prevention, and the public health response for COVID-19. The efficacy and reliability of these assays are of paramount importance in both tracking and controlling spread of the virus. Real-time RT-PCR assays rely on a fixed genetic sequence for primers and probe binding. Mutations can potentially alter the accuracy of these assays and lead to unpredictable analytical performance characteristics and false-negative results. Herein, we identify a G-to-U transversion (nucleotide 26372) in the SARS-CoV-2 E gene in three specimens with reduced viral detection efficiency using a widely available commercial assay. Further analysis of the public GISAID repository led to the identification of 18 additional genomes with this mutation, which reflect five independent mutational events. This work supports the use of dual-target assays to reduce the number of false-negative PCR results.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document