Lefamulin: The First Systemic Pleuromutilin Antibiotic

2020 ◽  
Vol 54 (12) ◽  
pp. 1203-1214
Author(s):  
Elias B. Chahine ◽  
Allana J. Sucher
Keyword(s):  
English Language ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Oral Formulation ◽  
Outpatient Setting ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Search Terms ◽  
Injection Site Reactions ◽  
Alternative Option ◽  
Study Selection ◽  
Enzyme Elevation

Objective: To review the pharmacology, microbiology, efficacy, and safety of lefamulin. Data Sources: A literature search was performed using PubMed and Google Scholar (2010 to end-April 2020) with the search terms BC-3781 and lefamulin. Other resources included abstracts presented at recent conferences, prescribing information, and the manufacturer’s and Food and Drug Administration websites. Study Selection and Data Extraction: All relevant English-language articles of studies assessing the efficacy and safety of lefamulin were included. Data Synthesis: Lefamulin is a pleuromutilin antibiotic with activity against Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and atypical bacteria. Lefamulin, given at the dose of 150 mg intravenously or 600 mg orally on an empty stomach every 12 hours for 5 to 7 days, was proven noninferior to moxifloxacin for the treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP). Common adverse reactions include injection site reactions, hepatic enzyme elevation, gastrointestinal upset, hypokalemia, insomnia, and headache. Lefamulin is associated with QT prolongation, and concomitant use with CYP3A substrates that prolong the QT interval is contraindicated. Lefamulin may cause fetal harm. Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice: Lefamulin is a novel antibiotic with a unique mechanism of action. It represents an alternative option to β-lactams and macrolides in the treatment of adults with CABP and an alternative option to amoxicillin and doxycycline in the outpatient setting given the rise in resistance to macrolides and safety concerns with fluoroquinolones. Nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea may limit the tolerability of the oral formulation. Conclusions: Lefamulin is the first systemic pleuromutilin antibiotic that has proven safe and effective for adults with CABP.

Dexrazoxane: A New Cardioprotective Agent

1998 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 182-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beverly D Abbott ◽  
Cindy M Ippoliti
Keyword(s):  
Supportive Care ◽  
English Language ◽  
Bolus Dose ◽  
Cardiac Tissue ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Data Synthesis ◽  
Medline Search ◽  
Search Terms ◽  
Study Selection ◽  
Clinically Significant

Objective: To review the literature discussing the use of dexrazoxane (e.g., Zinecard, ICRF-187) to prevent doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity. Data Sources: Pertinent English-language reports of studies in humans were retrieved from a MEDLINE search (January 1980-January 1997); search terms included chelating agents, razoxane, dexrazoxane, Zinecard, ICRF-187, ADR-529, and ICRF-159. Study Selection: Representative articles discussing the chemistry, pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, dosing, and administration of dexrazoxane and those discussing clinical trials were selected. Data Extraction: Data were extracted and analyzed if the information was relevant and consistent. Studies were selected for review in the text on the basis of study design and clinical end points. Data Synthesis: Dexrazoxane is a chemoprotective agent developed to prevent cardiac tissue toxicity. Dexrazoxane exerts a cardioprotective effect with some clinically significant toxicities; it may also interfere with the antitumor activity of doxorubicin. Until there are sufficient data to support its use in first-line supportive care therapy, dexrazoxane should be reserved for use in patients responding to doxorubicin-based chemotherapy but who have risk factors for cardiac toxicity or have received a cumulative doxorubicin bolus dose of 300 mg/m2. Conclusions: The management of doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity has led to the development of supportive care drugs that specifically counteract the dose-limiting toxicities. Dexrazoxane may not completely eliminate the concern about doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity, but it may open new avenues for continuing doxorubicin-based chemotherapy.

Stiripentol: A Novel Antiseizure Medication for the Management of Dravet Syndrome

2019 ◽  
Vol 53 (11) ◽  
pp. 1136-1144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcia L. Buck ◽  
Howard P. Goodkin
Keyword(s):  
English Language ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
The United States ◽  
Dravet Syndrome ◽  
Pathogenic Variants ◽  
Search Terms ◽  
Novel Approach ◽  
Study Selection ◽  
Refractory Seizures

Objective: To describe the pharmacology, efficacy, and safety of stiripentol in the treatment of refractory seizures in patients with Dravet syndrome. Data Sources: A search of the English language literature was conducted using PubMed and MEDLINE (1978 to April 2019) with the search terms stiripentol, Dravet syndrome, and refractory epilepsy. Other resources included article bibliographies, prescribing information, and relevant trials at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ . Study Selection and Data Extraction: All phase 1, 2, or 3 trials; observational studies; and retrospective studies were analyzed. Data Synthesis: In controlled studies, stiripentol has been shown to reduce seizure frequency by 50% or more in 40% to 70% of patients with Dravet syndrome. Reductions in seizure duration and episodes of status epilepticus have also been documented. Common adverse effects include somnolence and anorexia. Stiripentol inhibits the metabolism of clobazam and valproate, often requiring dose adjustment. Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice: Stiripentol, a direct allosteric modulator of GABAA receptors, offers a novel approach to treatment in patients with Dravet syndrome, both with and without pathogenic variants of the sodium channel α-1 subunit gene, and potentially other refractory seizures. Although available outside the United States for a decade, it was only recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration for patients 2 years of age and older with Dravet syndrome taking clobazam. Conclusions: Stiripentol is an effective adjunctive therapy for reducing the frequency and duration of refractory seizures in patients with Dravet syndrome. Its role in the treatment of other refractory epilepsies requires further study.

scholarly journals Cobicistat Versus Ritonavir: Similar Pharmacokinetic Enhancers But Some Important Differences

2017 ◽  
Vol 51 (11) ◽  
pp. 1008-1022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alice Tseng ◽  
Christine A. Hughes ◽  
Janet Wu ◽  
Jason Seet ◽  
Elizabeth J. Phillips
Keyword(s):  
English Language ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Therapeutic Index ◽  
Search Terms ◽  
Language Studies ◽  
Study Selection ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Properties ◽  
Medication Dose ◽  
Concomitant Medications ◽  
Potential Interactions

Objective: To describe properties of cobicistat and ritonavir; compare boosting data with atazanavir, darunavir, and elvitegravir; and summarize antiretroviral and comedication interaction studies, with a focus on similarities and differences between ritonavir and cobicistat. Considerations when switching from one booster to another are discussed. Data Sources: A literature search of MEDLINE was performed (1985 to April 2017) using the following search terms: cobicistat, ritonavir, pharmacokinetic, drug interactions, booster, pharmacokinetic enhancer, HIV, antiretrovirals. Abstracts from conferences, article bibliographies, and product monographs were reviewed. Study Selection and Data Extraction: Relevant English-language studies or those conducted in humans were considered. Data Synthesis: Similar exposures of elvitegravir, darunavir, and atazanavir are achieved when combined with cobicistat or ritonavir. Cobicistat may not be as potent a CYP3A4 inhibitor as ritonavir in the presence of a concomitant inducer. Ritonavir induces CYP1A2, 2B6, 2C9, 2C19, and uridine 5′-diphospho-glucuronosyltransferase, whereas cobicistat does not. Therefore, recommendations for cobicistat with comedications that are extrapolated from studies using ritonavir may not be valid. Pharmacokinetic properties of the boosted antiretroviral can also affect interaction outcome with comedications. Problems can arise when switching patients from ritonavir to cobicistat regimens, particularly with medications that have a narrow therapeutic index such as warfarin. Conclusions: When assessing and managing potential interactions with ritonavir- or cobicistat-based regimens, clinicians need to be aware of important differences and distinctions between these agents. This is especially important for patients with multiple comorbidities and concomitant medications. Additional monitoring or medication dose adjustments may be needed when switching from one booster to another.

Review of the Efficacy and Safety of Lemborexant, a Dual Receptor Orexin Antagonist (DORA), in the Treatment of Adults With Insomnia Disorder

2021 ◽  
pp. 106002802110084
Author(s):  
Kristin Waters
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Pharmacological Treatment ◽  
English Language ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Language Studies ◽  
Insomnia Disorder ◽  
Study Selection

Objective To provide an overview of the efficacy and safety of lemborexant in the treatment of insomnia disorder by assessing the currently available literature. Data Sources A literature search of PubMed was performed (2010 to March 2021) using the following search terms: lemborexant, sleep, orexin Study Selection and Data Extraction All relevant English-language studies were reviewed and considered, with a focus on phase 3 trials. Data Synthesis The efficacy and safety of lemborexant in the treatment of insomnia disorder in adults was demonstrated in 2 phase 3 trials. Lemborexant significantly reduced latency to persistent sleep compared with placebo. The first study also demonstrated a significant reduction compared with the active control zolpidem ER. Somnolence and headache were relatively common, but the marked adverse effects associated with other medications commonly used to treat insomnia, such as cognitive and psychomotor impairment and complex sleep-related behaviors, were not observed. Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice Although nonpharmacological therapy is considered first-line treatment for insomnia disorder, pharmacological treatment is most commonly utilized. Lemborexant is a viable pharmacological treatment option for patients who are unable to tolerate the adverse effects associated with the most commonly prescribed medications for insomnia, such as benzodiazepines and sedative-hypnotics (Z drugs). This is especially true for geriatric patients, who may be more sensitive to these adverse effects. Conclusion Lemborexant can be recommended to treat insomnia disorder when pharmacological treatment is warranted. It has demonstrated efficacy in clinical trials and is likely better tolerated than most currently available treatment options.

Intravenous Carbamazepine for Adults With Seizures

2017 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 285-289 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Brittany Vickery ◽  
Erika E. Tillery ◽  
Alicia Potter DeFalco
Keyword(s):  
English Language ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Oral Formulation ◽  
The United States ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Data Synthesis ◽  
Pooled Data ◽  
Oral Medications ◽  
Study Selection ◽  
Antiepileptic Drug Therapy

Objective: To review the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, safety, dosage and administration, potential drug-drug interactions, and place in therapy of the intravenous (IV) formulation of carbamazepine (Carnexiv) for the treatment of seizures in adult patients. Data Sources: A comprehensive PubMed and EBSCOhost search (1945 to August 2017) was performed utilizing the keywords carbamazepine, Carnexiv, carbamazepine intravenous, IV carbamazepine, seizures, epilepsy, and seizure disorder. Additional data were obtained from literature review citations, manufacturer’s product labeling, and Lundbeck website as well as Clinicaltrials.gov and governmental sources. Study Selection and Data Extraction: All English-language trials evaluating IV carbamazepine were analyzed for this review. Data Synthesis: IV carbamazepine is FDA approved as temporary replacement therapy for treatment of adult seizures. Based on a phase I trial and pooled data from 2 open-label bioavailability studies comparing oral with IV dosing, there was no noted indication of loss of seizure control in patients switched to short-term replacement antiepileptic drug therapy with IV carbamazepine. The recommended dose of IV carbamazepine is 70% of the patient’s oral dose, given every 6 hours via 30-minute infusions. The adverse effect profile of IV carbamazepine is similar to that of the oral formulation, with the exception of added infusion-site reactions. Conclusion: IV carbamazepine is a reasonable option for adults with generalized tonic-clonic or focal seizures, previously stabilized on oral carbamazepine, who are unable to tolerate oral medications for up to 7 days. Unknown acquisition cost and lack of availability in the United States limit its use currently.

High-Dose Inactivated Influenza Vaccine Quadrivalent for Older Adults

2020 ◽  
Vol 55 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-97
Author(s):  
Elias B. Chahine
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Influenza Vaccine ◽  
English Language ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Study Selection ◽  
Control And Prevention ◽  
Age Appropriate

Objective: To review the efficacy and safety of the high-dose inactivated influenza vaccine quadrivalent (HD-IIV4) in the prevention of influenza in older adults. Data Sources: A literature search was performed using PubMed and Google Scholar with the search terms high-dose, influenza vaccine, and quadrivalent. Other resources included the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the prescribing information, and the manufacturer’s website. Study Selection and Data Extraction: All relevant English-language articles of studies assessing the efficacy and safety of HD-IIV4 were included. Data Synthesis: HD-IIV4 is licensed by the Food and Drug Administration for the prevention of influenza in adults aged 65 years and older. The safety and immunogenicity of HD-IIV4 was demonstrated in a phase 3 trial, and the efficacy of the trivalent formulation (HD-IIV3) was demonstrated in a phase 3b-4 trial. HD-IIV4 carries a warning regarding the occurrence of Guillain-Barré syndrome. Adverse reactions, including injection-site pain and myalgia, were reported more frequently with HD-IIV4 than with HD-IIV3. Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice: Although the CDC recommends any age-appropriate influenza vaccine for adults aged 65 years and older, HD-IIV4 was associated with improved immunogenicity against the added B strain and HD-IIV3 provided better protection against influenza than the standard-dose vaccine. Other influenza vaccines have weaker evidence of efficacy in older adults. Therefore, HDIIV4 should be recommended as the vaccine of choice in adults aged 65 years and older. Conclusion: HD-IIV4 has proven immunogenic, safe, and effective in preventing influenza in older adults and should be recommended as the vaccine of choice in this patient population.

Vasopressin in Cardiac Arrest

2005 ◽  
Vol 39 (10) ◽  
pp. 1687-1692 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheri L Koshman ◽  
Peter J Zed ◽  
Riyad B Abu-Laban
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Hospital Discharge ◽  
Statistical Power ◽  
English Language ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Spontaneous Circulation ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Successful Resuscitation ◽  
Search Terms ◽  
Study Selection

Objective: To review the efficacy and safety of vasopressin in cardiac arrest. Data Sources: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed were searched (all to June 2005) for full-text English-language publications describing trials in humans. Search terms were vasopressin, epinephrine, adrenaline, heart arrest, cardiac arrest, and clinical trial. Study Selection and Data Extraction: Prospective, randomized, controlled trials that evaluated efficacy or safety endpoints of vasopressin in the management of cardiac arrest were included. Efficacy outcomes included return of spontaneous circulation, successful resuscitation, survival to hospital admission, 2hour survival, and survival to hospital discharge. Safety outcomes were as defined by each trial. Data Synthesis: Three prospective trials were identified and included in this review. Vasopressin does not appear to offer any therapeutic advantage compared with epinephrine in the treatment of both in-hospital and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, regardless of the presenting arrest rhythm. Although there is a suggestion that vasopressin may be effective in treatment of asystole, the evidence for this arises from a subgroup analysis that should be viewed as hypothesis generating. There are limited data describing the safety of vasopressin in cardiac arrest. CONCLUSIONS: The current evidence for the use of vasopressin in cardiac arrest is indeterminate. Given the similarly equivocal evidence of efficacy for epinephrine, either drug could be considered the first-line agent in cardiac arrest. Placebo-controlled studies with appropriate statistical power are warranted to evaluate meaningful clinical outcomes, such as survival to hospital discharge. Further evaluation of the role of vasopressin in asystolic cardiac arrest and its use in combination with epinephrine is also justified.

Brexanolone: A Novel Drug for the Treatment of Postpartum Depression

2020 ◽  
pp. 089719002097962
Author(s):  
Edna Patatanian ◽  
David R. Nguyen
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Postpartum Depression ◽  
English Language ◽  
Neuronal Excitability ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Background Information ◽  
Pharmacologic Therapy ◽  
Loss Of Consciousness ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Pubmed Search

Objectives: To review the pharmacology, efficacy, and safety of Brexanolone and define its role in the treatment of postpartum depression. Date Sources: A MEDLINE/PubMed search was conducted (1980-May 2020) using the following keywords: postpartum depression, antidepressants, pharmacologic therapy, drug therapy, and brexanolone to identify relevant articles. Study Selection/Data Extraction: Literature search was limited to human studies published in the English language. Phase I, II, and III studies evaluating the pharmacology, efficacy, safety of brexanolone for postpartum depression were included. Bibliographies of relevant articles evaluating postpartum depression and treatment were reviewed for additional citations and background information. Data Synthesis: Brexanolone is a soluble, proprietary, injectable formulation of allopregnanolone, a neuroactive steroid that modulates neuronal excitability. Allopregnanolone levels increase during pregnancy and decrease substantially after birth. These fluctuations have profound effects on anxiety and depression. Three clinical trials established the efficacy and safety of brexanolone in the treatment of postpartum depression. In all 3 trials, brexanolone had an acceptable safety profile and was well tolerated. The most common adverse effects were loss of consciousness, sedation, dry mouth, headache, dizziness, and flushing. Due to sudden loss of consciousness and excessive sedation, continuous pulse oximetry is recommended. Conclusion: Brexanolone has a novel mechanism of action and appears to be safe and effective for the treatment of moderate to severe postpartum depression. At present, high cost, serious adverse effects, and restricted access may limit its use in clinical practice.

Lead in Mineral or Multivitamin-Multimineral Products

2021 ◽  
pp. 106002802110233
Author(s):  
C. Michael White
Keyword(s):  
English Language ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
The United States ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Reference Level ◽  
Study Selection ◽  
Pubmed Search ◽  
Zinc Supplements ◽  
Average Lead ◽  
Year 2000

Objective Assess the current daily interim reference level of lead and the amount contained in current mineral and multivitamin-multimineral (MVM) products. Data Sources PubMed search from 1980 to May 15, 2021, limited to the English language, via the search strategy ((mineral OR multivitamin OR calcium OR iron OR magnesium OR copper OR zinc OR chromium OR selenium) AND (heavy metals OR Pb OR lead)). Study Selection and Data Extraction Narrative review of studies assessing lead content in mineral or MVM products. Data Synthesis Products containing different calcium forms (dolomite, bone meal, natural carbonate) have historically had higher lead levels than others (refined carbonate, lactate, gluconate, acetate, sevelamer), but the gap has closed considerably since the year 2000. Although only limited assessments of magnesium and zinc supplements have been conducted, no alarming average lead amounts were found. MVM products assessed since 2007 had low median or mean lead concentrations. However, large interproduct differences exist, with many products having very little lead and some products having concerning amounts. Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice It is difficult for pharmacists and consumers to know the amount of lead in an actual product unless it is tested in an independent third-party lab. The United States Pharmacopeia and NSF International will provide a seal on the products stating that the products have a low level of lead, but even so, children could receive more lead than the Food and Drug Administration’s Interim Reference Level. Conclusions The threat from lead exposure in mineral and MVM products have diminsihed considerably over time but some products can still have excessive amounts. Without third-party testing, it is difficult for clinicians and consumers to know which outlier products to avoid.

Recent Advances: Antiinfectives

1995 ◽  
Vol 29 (10) ◽  
pp. 1035-1040 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurie L Briceland ◽  
John D Cleary ◽  
Courtney V Fletcher ◽  
Daniel P Healy ◽  
Charles A Peloquin
Keyword(s):  
Infectious Diseases ◽  
English Language ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Information Service ◽  
Ulcer Disease ◽  
Additional Information ◽  
Study Selection ◽  
Enterococcus Spp ◽  
Scientific Meetings ◽  
Clinically Significant

Objective: To update readers on the significant changes in infectious diseases pharmacotherapy. Data Sources: An Index Medians and Iowa Drug Information Service search (1993–1994) of English-language literature pertaining to the selected topic areas was performed. Additional information from abstracts presented at scientific meetings were identified by the authors. Study Selection and Data Extraction: All identified studies were screened and those judged relevant to the update were evaluated. Data Synthesis: New or clinically significant data since 1992 that related to peptic ulcer disease, microbial resistance (e.g., Enterococcus spp., Streptococcus pneumoniae, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Candida albicans), immunomodulators, and AIDS were evaluated and compared with previous data. Conclusions: There have been several exciting and significant changes in infectious diseases pharmacotherapy evident from this review.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document