Patient-Reported Outcomes of Surgically Treated Insertional Achilles Tendinopathy

2021 ◽  
pp. 107110072110230
Author(s):  
Hubert Hörterer ◽  
Sonja Oppelt ◽  
Wolfgang Böcker ◽  
Oliver Gottschalk ◽  
Norbert Harrasser ◽  
...  

Background: The aim of this study was to assess the patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in patients with insertional Achilles tendinopathy (IAT) treated surgically by debridement of all pathologies through a midline-incision trans-achillary approach (MITA). Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study with current follow-up. Patients treated surgically by a MITA, addressing all pathologies of IAT, with at least 12 months of follow-up were included. Demographics, medical history, surgical details, and complications were recorded. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed using the Foot Function Index (FFI), Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment–Achilles questionnaire (VISA-A-G), visual analog scale foot and ankle (VAS-FA), and 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12). Longitudinal FFI data were available for 48% of the patients. Results: A total of 118 patients (63.4%) with a mean follow-up of 50 ± 25 months were included. The FFI improved from 53 (24) preoperatively to 2 (11) points at the final follow-up. The final VISA-A-G score was 93 (26), the VAS-FA score 93 (15), the SF-12 Physical Component Summary 56 (8), and the SF-12 Mental Component Summary 55 (12) points. There was an additional FFI improvement between 12 months and the final follow-up. Up to 47% (VISA-A-G) of patients had residual symptoms. A postoperative shoe conflict was the only parameter negatively affecting the PROMs ( P < .001). Conclusion: Addressing all pathologies of IAT by the MITA resulted in overall good postoperative PROMs after 4 years. But up to 47% of patients remained impaired. The only parameter correlating with an impaired PROM was a postoperative shoe conflict. Level of Evidence: Level IV, retrospective cohort study.

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (12) ◽  
pp. 1502-1509 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hubert Hörterer ◽  
Sebastian Felix Baumbach ◽  
Sonja Oppelt ◽  
Wolfgang Böcker ◽  
Norbert Harrasser ◽  
...  

Background: The midline-incision trans-achillary approach (MITA) is frequently used for addressing all pathologies of insertional Achilles tendinopathy (IAT). The aim of this study was to assess the complication rate and possible influencing factors following a MITA for IAT treatment. Methods: Presented is a retrospective cohort study with current follow-up. Patients treated surgically by a MITA, addressing all pathologies of IAT, between January 2010 and October 2016 at a single reference center with at least 12 months of follow-up were included. General demographics (age, sex, and body mass index), medical history, surgical details (individual and sum of pathologies addressed), and duration of in-hospital stay were assessed. Patient satisfaction, shoe conflict, current employment status, time to return to sports, and type of sports were recorded using a custom questionnaire. Standard statistics, chi-square, and t tests were performed using SPSS. A total of 118 patients (follow-up, 63.4%) with a mean age (± SD) of 50 ± 12 years and a mean final follow-up time (± SD) of 4.2 ± 2.1 were included. Results: Fourteen percent of patients had a minor complication, the majority (75%) of which were surgical site infections. Forty-one percent were limited in their shoe selection, and 32% reported a shoe conflict. Seventy-eight percent were very satisfied, and 89% would recommend the surgery. Neither the individual surgical procedures, their sum, nor any other parameter showed a significant influence on the complication rate. The only factor negatively affecting patient satisfaction was a shoe conflict ( P < .001). Conclusion: The MITA for IAT treatment showed a moderate minor complication rate with good midterm patient satisfaction. However, the approach might predispose patients to shoe conflict, which negatively influences their satisfaction. Level of Evidence: Level IV, retrospective cohort study.


2020 ◽  
pp. 219256822096632
Author(s):  
Austin Q. Nguyen ◽  
Garrett K. Harada ◽  
Kayla L. Leverich ◽  
Krishn Khanna ◽  
Philip K. Louie ◽  
...  

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Objectives: This study aimed to address the prevalence, distribution, and clinical significance of cervical high-intensity zones (HIZs) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with respect to pain and other patient-reported outcomes in the setting of patients that will undergo an anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) procedure. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of ACDF patients surgically treated at a single center from 2008 to 2015. Based on preoperative MRI, HIZ subtypes were identified as either traditional T2-hyperintense, T1-hypointense (“single-HIZs”), or combined T1- and T2-hyperintense (“dual-HIZs”), and their level-specific prevalence was assessed. Preoperative symptoms, patient-reported outcomes, and disc degeneration pathology were assessed in relation to HIZs and HIZ subtypes. Results: Of 861 patients, 58 demonstrated evidence of HIZs in the cervical spine (6.7%). Single-HIZs and dual-HIZs comprised 63.8% and 36.2% of the overall HIZs, respectively. HIZs found outside of the planned fusion segment reported better preoperative Neck Disability Index (NDI; P = .049) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Arm ( P = .014) scores relative to patients without HIZs. Furthermore, patients with single-HIZs found inside the planned fusion segment had worse VAS Neck ( P = .045) and VAS Arm ( P = .010) scores. In general, dual-HIZ patients showed no significant differences across all clinical outcomes. Conclusions: This is the first study to evaluate the clinical significance of HIZs in the cervical spine, noting level-specific and clinical outcome–specific variations. Single-HIZs were associated with significantly more pain when located inside the fusion segment, while dual-HIZs showed no associations with patient-reported outcomes. The presence of single-HIZs may correlate with concurrent spinal pathologies and should be more closely evaluated.


BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. e034257
Author(s):  
Jonas Sanberg Ljungdalh ◽  
Katrine Hass Rubin ◽  
Jesper Durup ◽  
Kim Christian Houlind

IntroductionLaparoscopic anti-reflux surgery is standard of care in surgical treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and is not without risks of adverse effects, including disruption of the fundoplication and postfundoplication dysphagia, in some cases leading to reoperation. Non-surgical factors such as pre-existing anxiety or depression influence postoperative satisfaction and symptom relief. Previous studies have focused on a short-term follow-up or only certain aspects of disease, such as reoperation or postoperative quality of life. The aim of this study is to evaluate long-term patient-satisfaction and durability of laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery in a large Danish cohort using a comprehensive multimodal follow-up, and to develop a clinically applicable scoring system usable in selecting patients for anti-reflux surgery.Methods and analysisThe study is a retrospective cohort study utilising data from patient records and follow-up with patient-reported quality of life as well as registry-based data. The study population consists of all adult patients having undergone laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery at The Department of Surgery, Kolding Hospital, a part of Lillebaelt Hospital Denmark in an 11-year period. From electronic records; patient characteristics, preoperative endoscopic findings, reflux disease characteristics and details on type of surgery, will be identified. Disease-specific quality of life and dysphagia will be collected from a patient-reported follow-up. From Danish national registries, data on comorbidity, reoperative surgery, use of pharmacological anti-reflux treatment, mortality and socioeconomic factors will be included. Primary outcome of this study is treatment success at follow-up.Ethics and disseminationStudy approval has been obtained from The Danish Patient Safety Agency, The Danish Health Data Authority and Statistics Denmark, complying to Danish and EU legislation. Inclusion in the study will require informed consent from participating subjects. The results of the study will be published in peer-reviewed medical journals regardless of whether these are positive, negative or inconclusive.Trial registration numberClinicaltrials.gov (NCT03959020).


2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (7) ◽  
pp. 729-736
Author(s):  
Georges Pfister ◽  
Malo Le Hanneur ◽  
Manon Bachy ◽  
Franck Fitoussi

Radial club hand deformities are commonly treated with arthrolysis to allow centralization of the ulna. In this retrospective cohort study of 31 hands in 28 patients, we aimed to assess the outcomes of correction using progressive distraction and subsequent percutaneous pinning of the wrist with a corrective ulnar osteotomy. Mean follow-up time was 7 years (range 2 to 20). The angulation of the hand–forearm complex was decreased after each step of the procedure. Mean correction of the angulation was 64°, and the residual total forearm–hand angulation was 12° after completion of the surgery. At the time of bony maturity (four patients), all wrists had fused. Fifty-eight reoperations were required in 31 wrists because of pin migration or breakage, and in addition 18 secondary osteotomies of the ulna were performed. From this study we conclude that distraction and pinning provide satisfactory and stable realignment of the wrist to correct the deformity, but this treatment has drawbacks regarding the high number of reoperations and the loss of wrist mobility. Level of evidence: IV


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document