Goal Setting as a Strategy for Health Behavior Change

1995 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 190-200 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor J. Strecher ◽  
Gerard H. Seijts ◽  
Gerjo J. Kok ◽  
Gary P. Latham ◽  
Russell Glasgow ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 615-618 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan R. Bailey

Health behavior change is challenging for most individuals, but there are many strategies that individuals can use to facilitate their behavior change efforts. Goal setting is one such strategy that assists individuals to identify specific behaviors to change and how to go about doing so. For many, however, simply setting a goal seldom leads to actual behavior change. For some, identifying an appropriate goal is difficult, while for others, putting goals into action is the roadblock. Two strategies may be of assistance for setting and achieving goals. First, consideration of key goal characteristics (eg, approach vs avoidance goals, performance vs mastery goals, level of difficulty) may result in selection of more appropriate and feasible goals. Second, action planning can help individuals put goals into action. Clinicians can help patients utilize these strategies to set and achieve goals for health behavior change.


2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy Ries ◽  
Loneke Blackman ◽  
Rachel Page ◽  
Ziya Gizlice ◽  
Salli Benedict ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane C Walsh ◽  
Janice Richmond ◽  
Jenny McSharry ◽  
AnnMarie Groarke ◽  
Liam Glynn ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Cancer survivorship in Ireland is increasing in both frequency and longevity. However, a significant proportion of cancer survivors do not reach recommended physical activity levels and have overweight. This has health implications both physical and psychological, including increased risk of subsequent and secondary cancers. Mobile health (mHealth) interventions demonstrate potential for positive health behavior change, but there is little evidence for the efficacy of mobile technology to improve health outcomes in cancer survivors with overweight/obesity. OBJECTIVE This study sought to investigate whether a personalized mHealth behavior change intervention improved physical and psychological health outcomes in cancer survivors with overweight/obesity. METHODS A sample of 123 cancer survivors (body mass index ≥25 kg/m2) was randomly assigned to the standard care control (n=61) or intervention (n=62) condition. Group allocation was unblinded. The intervention group attended a 4-hour tailored lifestyle information and education session with physiotherapists, a dietician, and clinical psychologist to support self-management of health behavior. Over the following 12 weeks, participants engaged in personalized goal-setting to incrementally increase physical activity (with feedback and review of goals through short message service text messaging contact with the research team). Objective measures of physical activity were collected using a Fitbit accelerometer. Data on anthropometric, functional exercise capacity, dietary behavior, and psychological measures were collected at face-to-face assessments in a single hospital site at baseline (T0), 12 weeks (T1; intervention end), and 24 weeks (T2; follow-up). RESULTS Rates of attrition were 21% for the control condition and 14% for the intervention condition. Using intent-to-treat analysis significant reductions in body mass index (BMI) (F(2,242) = 4.149, p = .017, ηp2= .033) and waist circumference (F(2,242) = 3.342, p = .037, np2 = .027) were seen in the intervention group. Over the 24-week study BMI was reduced by 0.52 in the intervention condition, relative to a non-significant reduction of 0.11 in the control arm. Waist circumference reduced by 3.02cm in the intervention relative to 1.82cm in the control condition. High levels of attainment for step count goals were observed with significantly higher levels of physical activity recorded for participants in the intervention group post-intervention (t(105) =2.60, p=.011) and at follow-up (t(105) =2.43, p=.017), accounting for up to 1999 additional steps per day. CONCLUSIONS The results demonstrate that for cancer survivors with a BMI ≥ 25 lifestyle education and personalized goal-setting using mobile technology can yield significant change on clinically relevant health indicators. Further research is needed to elucidate to mechanisms for behavior change and explore the capacity for mHealth interventions to improve broader health and wellbeing outcomes in the growing population of cancer survivors. CLINICALTRIAL ISRCTN-18676721 https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN18676721 INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT RR2-10.2196/13214


2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kara Harrington ◽  
Maureen E. Kenny ◽  
Deirdre Brogan ◽  
Lynn Y. Walsh

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luke Brownlow

BACKGROUND Smartphone applications (apps) are an ideal tool that is highly accessible to people who wish to begin self-treatment for depression. While many studies have performed content analyses on healthcare apps, few studies have reviewed these apps for adherence to behavior theory. Furthermore, apps for depression management are underrepresented in healthcare research. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study is to assess mHealth depression apps using SDT as a theoretical framework for meeting needs of autonomy, competence and, relatedness METHODS All depression healthcare apps available in Australia from the iTunes and Google Play app stores that met the inclusion criteria were analyzed. Each app was reviewed based on price options, store availability, download rates, and how in-app functions met the three basic needs for motivation towards health behavior change outlined in the Self-Determination Theory (SDT). RESULTS The analysis of the apps showed that most apps were free to download (69.9%) and addressed at least one of the three needs (81.4%) of SDT. However, few apps addressed all three of the basic needs through their functions (7.7%), and no apps hosted all functions expected to stimulate motivation for health behavior change. Furthermore, neither store availability, price option nor download rate were accurate predictors that apps hosted in-app functions expected to meet the basic needs. CONCLUSIONS The results suggest that some depression healthcare apps that meet the basic needs would effectively stimulate motivation (i.e., autonomy, competence, and relatedness). However, each individual app is limited in its number of functions that meet the basic needs. People who want access to more functions would need to download a suite of apps.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document