The importance of reporting suspected adverse reactions caused by new drugs

2015 ◽  
Vol 21 (11) ◽  
pp. 1478-1479
Author(s):  
Antònia Agustí
2008 ◽  
Vol 163 (3) ◽  
pp. 69-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Dyer ◽  
M. Spagnuolo-Weaver ◽  
S. Cooles ◽  
A. Tait

Author(s):  
Kosisochi Chinwendu Amorha ◽  
Anthony Chukwuma Onu ◽  
Chigozie Gloria Anene-okeke ◽  
Chinwe Victoria Ukwe

Objective: To evaluate drug therapy problems in asthma patients visiting a secondary and tertiary hospital in South-Eastern Nigeria.Methods: This study was a retrospective, cross-sectional analyses of the medical records of adult asthmatic patients receiving care in two hospitals in Enugu State, within a 15-year period. The Pharmaceutical Network Care Europe (PCNE) tool version 6.2 was used to assess drug therapy problems. The IBM Statistical Product for Services Solution (SPSS) version 20.0 was used for analysis. For all results, P ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.Results: Majority of the patients were below 60 y old (81.2%); female (68.8%) and were on more than two drugs (95.3%). Majority of the identified drug therapy problems (DTPs) were adverse reactions (65.7%). The inappropriate drug combination was the major cause of DTPs (65.6%). Only about 23.4% of the intervention outcomes were known. University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital (UNTH) had more interventions (35.9%) than Medical Centre (8.0%) (χ2 = 6.323; df = 1; **P = 0.012); and more of the outcomes of their interventions known (38.5%) compared to Medical Centre (0.0%) (χ2 = 12.559; df = 1; **P ˂ 0.001).Conclusion: Adverse reactions and inappropriate drug selection were the major identified DTPs and major cause of DTPs, respectively. Most DTPs had no interventions. The documented interventions included stopping of the drugs, change of drugs or dosage, change of instructions for use and starting of new drugs. Most interventions had unknown outcomes. UNTH had more interventions with known outcomes than the University of Nigeria Medical Centre.


Author(s):  
Lei Wang ◽  
Huiqiong Han ◽  
Zehua Wang ◽  
Litong Shi ◽  
Mei Yang ◽  
...  

Esophageal cancer (EC) is the eighth most common type of cancer and the sixth leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. At present, the clinical treatment for EC is based mainly on radical surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. However, due to the limited efficacy of conventional treatments and the serious adverse reactions, the outcome is still unsatisfactory (the 5-year survival rate for patients is less than 25%). Thus, it is extremely important and urgent to identify new therapeutic targets. The concept of tumor microenvironment (TME) has attracted increased attention since it was proposed. Recent studies have shown that TME is an important therapeutic target for EC. Microenvironment-targeting therapies such as immunotherapy and antiangiogenic therapy have played an indispensable role in prolonging survival and improving the prognosis of patients with EC. In addition, many new drugs and therapies that have been developed to target microenvironment may become treatment options in the future. We summarize the microenvironment of EC and the latest advances in microenvironment-targeting therapies in this review.


Author(s):  
Maciej Banach ◽  
Niki Katsiki ◽  
Gustavs Latkovskis ◽  
Manfredi Rizzo ◽  
Daniel Pella ◽  
...  

IntroductionIn the absence of a European standardized postmarketing food supplement surveillance system (nutrivigilance), some member states and companies have developed their own approaches to monitoring potential adverse reactions to secure a high level of product safety. This paper describes the use of a nutrivigilance system in monitoring the incidence of spontaneously reported suspected adverse reactions associated with food supplements containing red yeast rice (RYR).Material and methodsWe report the data from a widely used product marketed under the trademark Armolipid/Armolipid Plus. Postmarketing information was collected in a voluntary nutrivigilance system established by the manufacturing company (Meda Pharma SpA, a Viatris Company, Monza, Italy). From 1st October 2004 to 31st December 2019, this system captured cases of suspected adverse reactions spontaneously reported by consumers, healthcare professionals, health authorities, regardless of causality.ResultsThe total number of case reports received mentioning the RYR food supplement product line was 542, in which 855 adverse events (AEs) were reported. The total reporting rate of AEs was estimated to be 0.037% of 2,287,449 exposed consumers. Of the 542 cases, 21 (0.0009% of exposed consumers) included suspected serious adverse events (SAEs). After careful investigation, 6 cases (0.0003% of consumers exposed) and 6 AEs were assessed by the manufacturer as serious and potentially related to exposure to the above-mentioned RYR-based nutraceutical.ConclusionsThis nutrivigilance-derived data analysis clearly demonstrates a low prevalence of suspected adverse events associated with the red yeast rice product line. Consumer safety of food supplements could be generally improved by raising awareness of the importance of following the indications and warnings detailed in a food supplement’s labeling.


1992 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 16-16

When did you last send in a Yellow Card? Only one doctor in six has ever done so. Adverse reactions, particularly to new drugs, are under-reported by several orders of magnitude. Official regulatory bodies depend on this system and rightly want a strong case before revoking the licence of a drug whose benefits appear to outweigh the risks. The delays can conceal avoidable morbidity and mortality which often emerge only when a scandal breaks.


2013 ◽  
pp. 53-66
Author(s):  
Gulraj S. Matharu ◽  
Matthew P. Revell ◽  
Vaiyapuri Sumathi ◽  
Paul B. Pynsent ◽  
Peter A. Revell

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document