Effects of deviations in the nose and chin prominence on facial attractiveness

2021 ◽  
pp. 146531252098198
Author(s):  
Navid Rezaei ◽  
Hoshyar Abbasi ◽  
Ali Khaksar ◽  
Amin Golshah
Keyword(s):  
Visual Analogue Scale ◽  
Adult Female ◽  
Analogue Scale ◽  
Facial Attractiveness ◽  
Art Students ◽  
Facial Profile ◽  
Digital Photograph ◽  
Profile View ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Made In

Objective: To assess the effects of deviations in the nose and chin prominence on facial attractiveness. Methods: In this study, a reference digital photograph was taken from the facial profile view of an adult female model. Some changes were made in the nose and chin prominence in Photoshop software using the Crumley’s analysis. Changes made in the nose prominence yielded a prominent nose (2:11 ratio), a normal nose (3:53 ratio) and a small nose (4:61 ratio). Changes made in the chin prominence were protrusion by +2 and 0 mm and retrusion by −2, −4 and −6 mm (distance from the pogonion to the vertical reference line). In total, 18 orthodontists, 18 oral and maxillofacial surgeons, 18 art students and 18 laypeople evaluated the photographs (n = 15) and expressed their opinion regarding the facial profile attractiveness using a visual analogue scale (0−100). Data were analysed using SPSS version 18. Results: A significant difference was noted in the ratings of photographs (Greenhouse-Geisser, P < 0.001). Orthodontists gave a significantly higher score than laypeople to photographs with a small nose and deviations of the chin prominence ( P = 0.015). Art students gave a significantly higher score than laypeople to photographs with a prominent chin and deviations in the nose prominence ( P = 0.012). Conclusions: Facial profile with a normal (3:53 ratio) or small (4:61 ratio) nose and chin protrusion/retrusion by 2 mm (pogonion-vertical line) is considered attractive.

scholarly journals The Minimum Clinically Significant Difference in Visual Analogue Scale Pain Score in a Local Emergency Setting

2009 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 233-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
MSM Mark ◽  
TTS Au ◽  
YF Choi ◽  
TW Wong
Keyword(s):  
Visual Analogue Scale ◽  
Pain Score ◽  
Analogue Scale ◽  
Education Level ◽  
Chinese Patients ◽  
Visual Analogue Scale Pain ◽  
Emergency Setting ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Analogue Scale Pain ◽  
Clinically Significant

Objectives To determine whether the minimum clinically significant difference (MCSD) in visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score varies with age, gender, education level and cause of pain (trauma versus non-trauma) in Chinese patients. Methods This was a prospective descriptive study of local Chinese patients 15 years of age or older who presented with pain to the accident & emergency department. On presentation, patients were asked to indicate their current pain severity with a single mark through a standard 100–mm visual analogue scale. Then they would be offered an analgesic for pain-relief. After 30–45 minutes, the patients were asked to give a verbal categorical rating of their pain as ‘a lot better’, ‘a little better’, ‘much the same’, ‘a little worse’, or ‘much worse’ and to mark the level of pain on a VAS of the same type as used previously. The MCSD in VAS pain score was defined as the mean difference between the current and preceding scores when the subject reported ‘a little worse’ or ‘a little better’ in pain. Data were compared based on gender, age, education level, and traumatic versus non-traumatic causes of pain. Results 186 patients were enrolled in the study, yielding 77 evaluable comparisons where pain was rated as ‘a little better’ or ‘a little worse’. Overall, the MCSD in VAS pain score in the group was 17 mm (95%CI 13.6 mm to 20.6 mm). There were statistically significant differences between the MCSD in VAS pain score between genders and causes of pain (trauma versus non-trauma). Conclusions The MCSD in VAS pain scores was found to be 17 mm. There was significant differences in MCSD in VAS pain score in different genders and between trauma and non-trauma cases.

scholarly journals Evaluation of cosmetic appearance of herniotomy wound scars in African children: Comparison of tissue glue and subcuticular suturing

2009 ◽  
Vol 42 (02) ◽  
pp. 199-203
Author(s):  
A. O. Ademuyiwa ◽  
O. A. Sowande ◽  
O. Adejuyigbe ◽  
U. E. Usang ◽  
T. I. B. Bakare ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Analogue Scale ◽  
Analogue Scale ◽  
Wound Closure ◽  
Plastic Surgeon ◽  
Cosmetic Outcome ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Tissue Glue ◽  
Cosmetic Appearance ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Suturing Technique

ABSTRACT Aim: To evaluate the cosmetic appearance of herniotomy wound scars closed using either the tissue glue or subcuticular suturing technique. Materials and Methods: Prospective randomised control study; randomisation into tissue glue and suturing groups. Ethical clearance obtained. Cosmetic outcome were based on visual analogue scale by parents and Hollander wound evaluation scale by a Plastic Surgeon blinded to the wound closure method. Results: Fifty one wounds were evaluated, 26 in the tissue glue group and 25 in the suturing group. Parents’ evaluation using Visual Analogue scale (VAS) showed that in the suturing group, 17 parents (68%) gave a VAS of 8cm while six parents (24%) gave a score of 7cm. Two parents (8%) gave a score of 9cm. In the tissue glue group, 22 parents (84.6%) scored the scar of their children as 8 or 9cm on the VAS while four parents (15.4%) gave a score of 7cm. The median VAS was 8cm for both groups with a range of 7 to 9cm. The Chi- square test showed that the parents preferred tissue glue compared with subcuticular suturing (X2 = 7.90, P < 0.05). The Hollander Wound Evaluation Scale (HWES) used by Plastic Surgeon showed 21 herniotomy wounds (84%) had a score of 6 in the suturing group while four wounds (16%) had a score of 5. In the tissue glue group, 19 wounds (73%) had a score of 6, six wounds (23.1%) had a score of 5 and a patient (3.8%) had a score of 4. The median score is 6 for both groups. There was no statistically significant difference between both groups (X2 = 1.481, P = 0.393). Conclusion: This study has shown that the cosmetic outcome of wound closure using the tissue glue technique and subcuticular suturing technique are similar.

scholarly journals Comparison of Postoperative Pain between Patients who underwent Primary and Repeated Caesarean Section: A Prospective Cohort Study

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guangyou Duan ◽  
Guiying Yang ◽  
Jing Peng ◽  
Zhenxin Duan ◽  
Jie Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Visual Analogue Scale ◽  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Prospective Cohort Study ◽  
Prospective Cohort ◽  
Analogue Scale ◽  
Visceral Pain ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Repeat Cesarean Section

Abstract Background: The presences of differences in post-operative pain are unclear between the primipara who underwent a primary cesarean section and multipara who underwent first repeat cesarean section. The study aimed to explore the possible difference in postoperative pain between primipara and multipara. Methods: A prospective cohort study was carried out, and only women who underwent cesarean deliveries under spinal anesthesia were included. Postoperative patient-controlled intravenous analgesia was performed for all subjects with 0.2 mg/kg hydromorphone and 4 mg/kg flurbiprofen, and the pump was programmed as 2.0 mL/h background infusion, and loading dose of 1 mL with a lockout period of 15 min. Postoperative incision and visceral pain intensity were evaluated using visual analogue scale, and inadequate analgesia was defined as visual analogue scale ≥40 during the postoperative 48 hours. Additionally, the patients’ pain statuses on postoperative week 1 and week 4 were also assessed during follow-up via telephone. Results: From January to May 2017, a total of 168 patients (67 primipara and 101 multipara) were included. The relative risk for multipara to experience inadequate analgesia on incision pain was 0.42 (95% CI: 0.25 to 0.74) compared to primipara. In patients under 30 years old, inadequate analgesia on visceral pain in the multipara was higher than that on the primipara (RR, 3.56 [1.05 to 12.04], P=0.025). There was no significant difference in the combined incidence of inadequate analgesia in both types of pain between the multipara and primipara (33.7%vs.40.2%, P=0.381). No difference was found in PCIA consumption between two groups. (111.1 ± 36.0mL vs. 110.9 ± 37.3mL, P=0.979) Additionally, a significantly higher incidence of pain at 4 weeks after the surgery was noted in the primipara compared to the multipara (62.2%vs.37.7%, P=0.011). Conclusions: Multipara who underwent first repeat cesarean section have lower risk to experience inadequate analgesia on incision pain during the first 48 hours after surgery compared to primipara. While multipara under 30 years may be more prone to experiencing postoperative inadequate analgesia on visceral pain.

scholarly journals Comparison of postoperative pain between patients who underwent primary and repeated cesarean section: a prospective cohort study

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Guangyou Duan ◽  
Guiying Yang ◽  
Jing Peng ◽  
Zhenxin Duan ◽  
Jie Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Visual Analogue Scale ◽  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Prospective Cohort Study ◽  
Prospective Cohort ◽  
Analogue Scale ◽  
Visceral Pain ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Repeat Cesarean Section

Abstract Background The differences in post-operative pain are unclear between the primiparas who underwent a primary cesarean section and multiparas who underwent their first repeat cesarean section. The study aimed to explore the possible differences in postoperative pain between primiparas and multiparas. Methods A prospective cohort study was performed only including women who underwent cesarean deliveries under spinal anesthesia. Postoperative patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) was administered to all subjects with 0.2 mg/kg hydromorphone and 4 mg/kg flurbiprofen; the pump was programmed as 2.0 mL/h background infusion with a loading dose of 1 mL and a lockout period of 15 min. Postoperative incision and visceral pain intensity were evaluated using the visual analogue scale, and inadequate analgesia was defined as a visual analogue scale score ≥ 40 during 48 h post-operation. Additionally, the patients’ pain statuses in postoperative week 1 and week 4 were also assessed during follow-up via telephone. Results From January to May 2017, a total of 168 patients (67 primiparas and 101 multiparas) were included. The relative risk for multiparas to experience inadequate analgesia on incision pain was 0.42 (95% CI: 0.25 to 0.74) compared to primiparas. In patients aged < 30 years, inadequate analgesia on visceral pain was higher in multiparas than in primiparas (RR, 3.56 [1.05 to 12.04], P = 0.025). There was no significant difference in the combined incidence of inadequate analgesia in both types of pain between the multiparas and primiparas (33.7% vs. 40.2%, P = 0.381). No difference was found in PCIA use between the two groups (111.1 ± 36.0 mL vs. 110.9 ± 37.3 mL, P = 0.979). In addition, a significantly higher incidence of pain was noted 4 weeks post-surgery in primiparas than that in multiparas (62.2% vs. 37.7%, P = 0.011). Conclusion Multiparas who underwent their first repeat cesarean section have a lower for inadequate analgesia on incision pain during the first 48 h after surgery than primiparas. Multiparas aged under 30 years may be more prone to experiencing postoperative inadequate analgesia on visceral pain. Trail Registration ClinicalTrial.gov: NCT03009955, Date registered: December 30, 2016.

The effect of distraction on pain perception during an endovenous thermal ablation procedure

2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (7) ◽  
pp. 463-470 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carina EG van Zandvoort ◽  
Irwin M Toonder ◽  
Irma AJ Stoopendaal ◽  
Cees HA Wittens
Keyword(s):  
Visual Analogue Scale ◽  
Pain Score ◽  
Thermal Ablation ◽  
Analogue Scale ◽  
Pain Perception ◽  
Visual Analogue Scale Pain ◽  
Visual Distraction ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Analogue Scale Pain ◽  
Endovenous Thermal Ablation

Objectives To determine whether audio and visual distraction can affect the pain perception of a patient undergoing endovenous thermal ablation under tumescent anesthesia. Methods Patients underwent an endovenous thermal ablation procedure and were randomized into two groups: non-distraction (AVD−) and with distraction (AVD+). Visual analogue scale pain score and hospital anxiety depression scale scores were used to measure outcome. The recruited patients were asked to submit an anticipated visual analogue scale pain score prior to treatment as well as the actual experienced post-operative visual analogue scale pain score. Results There was no significant difference between the AVD− and AVD+ groups post-operative pain score 2.85 (SD 1.7) versus 2.60 (SD 2.3), p = 0.68. Pain score in women with distraction (AVD+) decreased from 3.81 to 2.42. The pain score in men with distraction (AVD+) increases from 1.88 to 2.82. In the AVD− group, a significant difference was found between men and women ( p = 0.014). Disregarding gender, a significant difference was found between the anticipated pain score and the actual pain score in both the AVD− group ( p = 0.009) and AVD+ group ( p = 0.021). There was a correlation between depression and the pain score, which was not seen between pain and anxiety score. Conclusion The results suggested that audiovisual distraction has no influence on the visual analogue scale pain score during endovenous thermal ablation under tumescent anesthesia. Despite this, patients appreciate and evaluate audio and visual distraction as pleasant to extremely pleasant when applied.

scholarly journals Comparison of Four Different Pain Relief Methods during Hysterosalpingography: A Randomized Controlled Study

2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bekir Serdar Unlu ◽  
Mehmet Yilmazer ◽  
Gulengul Koken ◽  
Dagistan Tolga Arioz ◽  
Ebru Unlu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pain Relief ◽  
Visual Analogue Scale ◽  
Analogue Scale ◽  
Cervix Uteri ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Group 4 ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

BACKGROUND: Hysterosalpingography (HSG) is the most commonly used method for evaluating the anatomy and patency of the uterine cavity and fallopian tubes, and is an important tool in the evaluation of infertility. The most frequent side effect is the pain associated with the procedure.OBJECTIVES: To evaluate four analgesic methods to determine the most useful method for reducing discomfort associated with HSG.METHODS: In the present prospective study, 75 patients undergoing HSG for evaluation of infertility were randomly assigned to four groups: 550 mg of a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) (group 1); 550 mg NSAID + paracervical block (group 2); 550 mg NSAID + paracervical analgesic cream (group 3); or 550 mg NSAID + intrauterine analgesic instillation (group 4). A visual analogue scale was used to assess the pain perception at five predefined steps.RESULTS: Instillation of the liquids used for HSG was found to be the most painful step of HSG, and this step was where the only significant difference among groups was observed. When comparing visual analogue scale scores, group 2 and group 3 reported significantly less pain than the other groups. Group 1 reported significantly higher mean ( ± SD) scores (7.2 ± 1.6) compared with groups 2 and 3 (4.7 ± 2.5 and 3.8 ± 2.4, respectively) (P<0.001). In addition, group 2 reported significantly less pain than group 4 (4.7 ± 2.5 versus 6.7 ± 1.8, respectively) (P<0.02).CONCLUSIONS: For effective pain relief during HSG, in addition to 550 mg NSAID, local application of lidocaine cream to the posterior fornix of the cervix uteri and paracervical lidocaine injection into the cervix uteri appear to be the most effective methods.

Efficacy of clindamycin in reducing pain following tonsillectomy in adults: a double-blind, randomised trial

2013 ◽  
Vol 127 (11) ◽  
pp. 1106-1110 ◽  
Author(s):  
M H Baradaranfar ◽  
V Zand ◽  
M H Dadgarnia ◽  
S Atighechi
Keyword(s):  
Visual Analogue Scale ◽  
Normal Saline ◽  
Analogue Scale ◽  
Randomised Trial ◽  
Randomised Clinical Trial ◽  
Visual Analogue Scale Pain ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Throat Pain ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Post Operation

AbstractObjective:Tonsillectomy is a common operation performed in children and young adults. Pain and post-operation haemorrhage are its most common complications. This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of topical antibiotics in reducing throat pain after tonsillectomy in adult patients.Methods:A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised clinical trial was conducted, enrolling 30 patients older than 18 years who were scheduled to undergo tonsillectomy. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either clindamycin or normal saline (as placebo). Throat pain severity was evaluated using a visual analogue scale.Results:All patients in both groups had experienced a reduction in pain by the seventh day after surgery. There was no statistically significant difference in the extent of visual analogue scale pain score reduction, comparing the placebo and clindamycin groups throughout the study course (p = 0.424).Conclusion:Topical clindamycin was not demonstrated to be more effective than normal saline in the reduction of throat pain following tonsillectomy in adults.

Treatment of Acute Alcohol Withdrawal Syndrome with Carbamazepine: A Double-Blind Comparison with Tiapride

1982 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 160-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Agricola ◽  
M Mazzarino ◽  
R Urani ◽  
V Gallo ◽  
E Grossi
Keyword(s):  
Visual Analogue Scale ◽  
Alcohol Withdrawal ◽  
Withdrawal Syndrome ◽  
Analogue Scale ◽  
Clinical Effect ◽  
Delirium Tremens ◽  
Alcohol Withdrawal Syndrome ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Blind Comparison

A double-blind, randomized trial is described which was designed to compare the clinical effect of 600 mg daily of carbamazepine (Tegretol®) and of tiapride (Sereprile®) in hospitalized patients with pre-delirium tremens. Physicians' assessment of patients' progress was made following 2, 4 and 7 days of treatment. Of the sixty patients admitted to the study, five dropped out for various reasons, leaving fifty-five patients who completed the study. Both drugs were effective in the treatment of alcohol withdrawal symptoms; no significant difference was found between the two treatments with respect to total symptoms' score and visual analogue scale assessment. Carbamazepine gave faster relief of symptoms and demonstrated a preferential action on symptoms like fear and hallucinations. No case of delirium tremens was observed in those patients who completed the trial.

scholarly journals An eye-tracking and visual analogue scale attractiveness evaluation of black space between the maxillary central incisors

2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmad AL-LAHHAM ◽  
Paulo Henrique Couto SOUZA ◽  
Caio Seiti MIYOSHI ◽  
Sérgio Aparecido IGNÁCIO ◽  
Thiago Martins MEIRA ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Perception ◽  
Visual Analogue Scale ◽  
Eye Tracking ◽  
Analogue Scale ◽  
Fixation Time ◽  
Aesthetic Perception ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Face ◽  
Negative Effect ◽  
The Aesthetic

ABSTRACT Objective: To study the influence of black space between the maxillary central incisors on the aesthetic visual perception of the face, via eye-tracking and visual analogue scale (VAS). Methods: Black space between the central incisors was created, for both sexes, as follows: control, 1-mm black space, 2-mm black space and 3-mm black space. Ninety raters participated in this study, divided into three groups: 30 laypeople, 30 nonorthodontists, and 30 orthodontists. After the visual calibration of each observer, eight photographs were presented in the Ogama® software concomitant with the use of the hardware The Eye Tribe®. Ogama generated information depending on the eye-tracking of each rater, regarding the time until the first fixation, time of fixation, heatmap, scanpath, and total time of fixation, to evaluate the areas deemed to be of interest according to the raters. Later on, the VAS was used, where each rater evaluated the images in an album on a scale of zero to 10 points. Results: The eyes and mouth were the areas more often noticed by the raters according to the heatmaps, while no significant difference was observed in time until the first fixation between the three groups of raters (p> 0.05). However, regarding the time of fixation on the mouth, a significant difference was observed (p< 0.05) when comparing the three groups. Conclusion: Black space has a negative effect on the aesthetic perception of the face. The amount of attention on the mouth is correspondent to the size of the black space.

scholarly journals Impact of Pilates on the Intensity of Pain in the Spine of Women of the First Mature age

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-17
Author(s):  
Vitalii Kashuba ◽  
Yuliia Tomilina ◽  
Nataliia Byshevets ◽  
Inna Khrypko ◽  
Olha Stepanenko ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Spine ◽  
Visual Analogue Scale ◽  
Analogue Scale ◽  
Cervical Region ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Sports Club ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Thoracic And Lumbar Spine ◽  
Experimental Group ◽  
Different Parts

The purpose of the study is to determine the dynamics of pain intensity in different parts of the spine in women of the first mature age under the influence of pilates. Materials and methods. 64 women took part in research. The women were divided into two groups, each of which included 32 people. The study was carried out at the Sokol sports club and the Olimp fitness club in Kiev. We used the questionnaire “Visual analogue scale of pain”.  Results. We measured the level of pain in the cervical, thoracic and lumbar spine of women of the first mature age. It was found that only 4.69 % of women do not have pain. It was found that women of the first mature age the most often feel painin the cervical region. The women of the control group were engaged in a typical Pilates program. The women of the experimental group were engaged in the author’s program, a feature of which was the use of large equipment during classes. In addition, women who could not attend classes were offered the Pilates computer program. For the experiment, no statistically significant difference between the level of pain in different parts of the spine of women was established. After the experiment, a statistically significant decrease in the level of pain in the lumbar section of women in the experimental group was recorded compared with women in the control group.  Conclusions. The results indicate the effectiveness of large equipment to reduce the level of pain in the back of a woman.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document