scholarly journals Perceptions of COPD patients of the proposed withdrawal of inhaled corticosteroids prescribed outside guidelines: A qualitative study

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
pp. 147997311985588 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gill Gilworth ◽  
Timothy Harries ◽  
Chris Corrigan ◽  
Mike Thomas ◽  
Patrick White
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Inhaled Corticosteroids ◽  
Qualitative Interviews ◽  
Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease ◽  
Airflow Limitation ◽  
Individual Risk ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Copd Patients ◽  
Global Initiative ◽  
Long Acting

Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease guidelines support the prescription of fixed combination inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and long-acting β-agonists in symptomatic COPD patients with frequent or severe exacerbations, with the aim of preventing them. ICS are frequently also prescribed to COPD patients with mild or moderate airflow limitation, outside guidelines, with the risk of unwanted effects. No investigation to date has addressed the views of these milder COPD patients on ICS withdrawal. The objective is to assess the views of COPD patients with mild or moderate airflow limitation on the staged withdrawal of ICS prescribed outside guidelines. One-to-one semi-structured qualitative interviews exploring COPD patients’ views about ICS use and their attitudes to proposed de-prescription were conducted. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was completed. Seventeen eligible COPD patients were interviewed. Many participants were not aware they were using an ICS. None was aware that prevention of exacerbations was the indication for ICS therapy or the risk of associated side effects. Some were unconcerned by what they perceived as low individual risk. Others expressed fears of worsening symptoms on withdrawal. Most with mild or moderate airflow limitation would have been willing to attempt withdrawal or titration to a lower dosage of ICS if advised by their clinician, particularly if a reasoned explanation were offered. Attitudes in this study to discontinuing ICS use varied. Knowledge of the drug itself, the indications for its prescription in COPD and potential for side effects, was scant. The proposed withdrawal of ICS is likely to be challenging and requires detailed conversations between patients and respiratory healthcare professionals.

Triple Therapy in COPD

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 102-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudio Micheletto ◽  
Alice Sparacino
Keyword(s):  
Triple Therapy ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Glycopyrronium Bromide ◽  
Copd Patients ◽  
Global Initiative ◽  
Long Acting ◽  
The Impact

: Triple inhaled therapy for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) includes an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS), a long-acting b2-agonist (LABA) and a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) taken in combination. Triple therapy is recommended by the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) for patients who experience recurrent exacerbations despite treatment with either a dual bronchodilator or LABA/ICS combination. There is consistent evidence that the LABA/LAMA/ICS combination has significantly greater effects on trough FEV1, symptoms, quality of life, and exercise performance compared to comparator treatments. : The role of triple therapy in reducing exacerbations in COPD patients is debatable, but recent trials have revealed some intriguing insights. : Three pivotal studies, namely TRILOGY, TRINITY and TRIBUTE have been conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of extrafine Beclomethasone/Formoterol Fumarate/Glycopyrronium Bromide (BDP/FF/GB) versus different treatment options for COPD. Extrafine BDP/FF/GB has been compared to an ICS/LABA (BDP/FF) combination in the TRILOGY study, to a LAMA monotherapy (Tiotropium-TIO) and an extemporary triple combination of ICS/LABA + LAMA (BDP/FF + TIO) in the TRINITY study, and to one inhalation of LABA/LAMA per day (Indacaterol/ Glycopyrronium - IND/GLY) in the TRIBUTE study. : Another triple therapy with Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) was recently tested in two further studies that included patients with COPD. The FULFIL study compared the efficacy of the triple FF/UMEC/VI therapy to the ICS/LABA association budesonide/formoterol, while the IMPACT study compared the rate of moderate and severe exacerbations between singleinhaler FF/UMEC/VI and single-inhaler FF/VI or UMEC/VI.

Narrative Literature Review Guided Approach of Inhaled Corticosteroid de-escalation in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

2021 ◽  
pp. 089719002110537
Author(s):  
Anamarie Tomaich ◽  
Shawnee Klatt ◽  
Michael W. Nagy
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Inhaled Corticosteroids ◽  
Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Blood Eosinophil ◽  
Inhaled Corticosteroid ◽  
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Copd Patients ◽  
Long Acting

Objective To review the 2020 Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) report recommendations and create an algorithm to assist clinicians in determining which chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients qualify for inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) de-escalation. Data Sources: A literature search of MEDLINE/PubMed from 2002 to August 2021 was conducted using the search terms inhaled corticosteroids, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and de-escalation and review of the reference lists of identified articles for pertinent citations. Study Selection and Data Extraction Relevant studies and articles were included if they focused on the utilization of ICS in COPD. Data Synthesis The 2020 GOLD report only recommends triple therapy with ICS, long acting beta agonists, and long acting muscarinic antagonists for patients with frequent exacerbations, frequent hospitalizations, or elevated blood eosinophil counts. Despite this clear framework, patients are prescribed ICS without these characteristics. Available evidence suggests that these patients can be de-escalated from ICS therapy without concern for worsening lung function or exacerbations. Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice: Patients with COPD may be experiencing more risk than benefit on ICS therapy. Clinicians should be knowledgeable on how to evaluate patient therapy for appropriateness and know how to safely deprescribe ICS given their limited efficacy in many COPD patients. Conclusion There remains no specific guidance on how to de-escalate patients off an ICS when the therapy is not indicated. Use of clinical evidence with stepwise algorithms can be models to approach de-escalation of ICS in patients with COPD.

scholarly journals Possibilities and limitations of inhaled corticosteroids in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 602-612
Author(s):  
I. V. Leshchenko
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Inhaled Corticosteroids ◽  
Airflow Limitation ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Copd Patients ◽  
History Of ◽  
Long Acting ◽  
Exacerbation Of Copd

Combinations of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and long-acting bronchodilators are recommended for those patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who did not improve significantly with regular long-acting bronchodilators. ICS are known to increase the risk of pneumonia in elderly patients (over 55 years), current smokers, patients with acute exacerbation of COPD, patients with history of previous pneumonia, patients with body mass index < 25 kg/m2, and patients with dyspnea or severe airflow limitation. The risk-benefit ratio should be considered before initiating the treatment with ICS in COPD patients, particularly in patients with the risk factors of adverse events associated with ICS.

scholarly journals INDACO project: a pilot study on incidence of comorbidities in COPD patients referred to pneumology units

2013 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giorgio Fumagalli ◽  
Fabrizio Fabiani ◽  
Silvia Forte ◽  
Massimiliano Napolitano ◽  
Paolo Marinelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Study ◽  
Inhaled Corticosteroids ◽  
Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Copd Exacerbations ◽  
Copd Patients ◽  
High Prevalence ◽  
Global Initiative ◽  
The Impact

Background: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is often associated with comorbidities, especially cardiovascular, that have a heavy burden in terms of hospitalization and mortality. Since no conclusive data exist on the prevalence and type of comorbidities in COPD patients in Italy, we planned the INDACO observational pilot study to evaluate the impact of comorbidities in patients referred to the outpatient wards of four major hospitals in Rome. Methods: For each patient we recorded anthropometric and anamnestic data, smoking habits, respiratory function, GOLD (Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease) severity stage, Body Mass Index (BMI), number of acute COPD exacerbations in previous years, presence and type of comorbidities, and the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Results: Here we report and discuss the results of the first 169 patients (124 males, mean age 74±8 years). The prevalence of patients with comorbidities was 94.1% (25.2% of cases presented only one comorbidity, 28.3% two, 46.5% three or more). There was a high prevalence of arterial hypertension (52.1%), metabolic syndrome (20.7%), cancers (13.6%) and diabetes (11.2%) in the whole study group, and of anxiety-depression syndrome in females (13%). Exacerbation frequency was positively correlated with dyspnea score and negatively with BMI. Use of combination of bronchodilators and inhaled corticosteroids was more frequent in younger patients with more severe airways obstruction and lower CCI. Conclusions: These preliminary results show a high prevalence of comorbidities in COPD patients attending four great hospitals in Rome, but they need to be confirmed by further investigations in a larger patients cohort.

Current opportunities of inhaled corticosteroid therapy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-87
Author(s):  
I. V. Leshchenko ◽  
A. S. Meshcheryakova
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Inhaled Corticosteroids ◽  
Fixed Combination ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Delivery Device ◽  
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Copd Patients ◽  
Long Acting ◽  
Blood Eosinophils

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the leading cause of death in the structure of respiratory diseases. The problem of rational pharmacotherapy of COPD have attracted attention of the medical scientific society for many years. The understanding of the pathogenesis of the disease has deepened and approaches to the therapy have changed. Some COPD patients need regular fixed-combination therapy: long-acting bronchodilators (LABD) and inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in order to prevent exacerbations and reduce the severity of symptoms of the disease. Blood eosinophils count is one of criteria for choosing regular therapy. The appearance of fixed triple combinations of ICS/LABD increased the effectiveness of COPD therapy, and a new delivery device for fixed combination of budesonide/formoterol makes it possible to use ICS successfully in the most severe patients.

scholarly journals Diabetes as a risk factor for severe exacerbation and death in patients with COPD: a prospective cohort study

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 822-827
Author(s):  
Maria T Castañ-Abad ◽  
Josep Montserrat-Capdevila ◽  
Pere Godoy ◽  
Josep R Marsal ◽  
Marta Ortega ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Hospital Admission ◽  
Lung Disease ◽  
Prospective Cohort ◽  
Obstructive Lung Disease ◽  
Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Severe Exacerbation ◽  
Copd Patients ◽  
Global Initiative

Abstract Background Type 2 diabetes comorbidity is common in patients with COPD. One of the most frequent causes of hospital admission in patients with COPD are exacerbations. Methods Prospective cohort study, which included 512 patients with COPD recruited in a primary care centre in Mollerussa (Lleida, Spain). Inclusion criteria were: patients &gt;40 years of age with COPD according to the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease. Variables collected were as follows: age, gender, civil status, education level, smoking habit, severity (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease), comorbidities (Charlson), history of severe exacerbations, dyspnoea (mMRC), BODEx, EuroQol 5 D and depression (HAD). Logistic regression was used to determine the association of diabetes with risk of hospital admission and death. Results Prevalence of diabetes was 25.8%. During the second year of follow up, 18.2% of patients with COPD and diabetes were admitted for exacerbation, in comparison with 8.9% non-diabetic COPD patients. The variables associated with hospital admission were diabetes (ORa=1.54); gender (men, ORa=1.93); age (ORa=1.02); number of hospital admissions during the previous year: 1 (ORa=2.83) or more than one admission (ORa=4.08); EuroQol 5 D (ORa=0.76) and BODEx (ORa=1.24). With the exclusion of BODEx, all these variables were associated with a higher risk of death. Conclusion Prevalence of diabetes is high in patients suffering from COPD. COPD patients with diabetes are at higher risk of severe exacerbation and death. The suggested predictive model could identify patients at higher risk so that adequate preventive and therapeutic measures can be implemented.

scholarly journals Impaired Hemorheology in Exacerbations of COPD

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erhan Ugurlu ◽  
Emine Kilic-Toprak ◽  
Ilknur Can ◽  
Ozgen Kilic-Erkek ◽  
Goksel Altinisik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Symptoms ◽  
Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease ◽  
Airflow Limitation ◽  
Erythrocyte Aggregation ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Patient Treatment ◽  
Rheological Parameters ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Copd Patients ◽  
Rbc Deformability

Background. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterized by progressive airflow limitation. Cardiovascular-related comorbidities are established to contribute to morbidity and mortality especially during exacerbations. The aim of the current study was to determine alterations in hemorheology (erythrocyte aggregation, deformability) in newly diagnosed COPD patients and their response to medical treatment and to compare with values of COPD patients with exacerbations.Materials and Methods. The study comprised 13 COPD patients, 12 controls, and 16 COPD patients with exacerbations. The severity of COPD was determined according toGlobal Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Diseaseguidelines. Red blood cell (RBC) deformability and aggregation were measured by an ektacytometer.Results. RBC deformability of COPD patients with exacerbations was decreased compared to the other groups. Erythrocyte aggregation and plasma fibrinogen of COPD patients determined during exacerbations were higher than control.Conclusion. Decreased RBC deformability and increased aggregation associated with exacerbations of COPD may serve as unfavorable mechanisms to worsen oxygenation and thus clinical symptoms of the patient. Treatment modalities that modify rheological parameters might be beneficial.

scholarly journals Underuse of spirometry by general practitioners for the diagnosis of COPD in Italy

2005 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Caramori ◽  
G. Bettoncelli ◽  
R. Tosatto ◽  
F. Arpinelli ◽  
G. Visonà ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
General Practitioners ◽  
Gold Standard ◽  
Obstructive Lung Disease ◽  
Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease ◽  
Further Education ◽  
Airflow Limitation ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Global Initiative

Background. The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) underlines that spirometry is the gold standard as the most reproducible, standardised, and objective way of measuring airflow limitation in the diagnosis and assessment of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). However, studies undertaken in different countries have suggested a widespread underuse of spirometry by general practitioners to establish the diagnosis of COPD. Precise estimates of the prevalence of physician-diagnosed COPD in Italy are not currently available. In collaboration with the Italian Academy of General practitioners (SIMG) we have investigated the degree of use of spirometry to establish the diagnosis of COPD in Italy. Methods. A standardised questionnaire has been selfadministered to a sample of 2425 Italian general practitioners (representing 5% of all the Italian doctors involved in general practice). They have been chosen to cover each of the Italian counties. Results. The prevalence of physician-diagnosed COPD was found to be approximately 4%. However, 30% of general practitioners do not use spirometry to establish the diagnosis of COPD. The main reasons given for the failure to use spirometry are (i) that spirometry is not necessary for the diagnosis of COPD or (ii) there are logistical limitations to the access of the patients to lung function laboratories. Conclusions. This data suggests that contrary to GOLD Guidelines, in Italy, as with other countries, spirometry is not always used in the diagnosis of COPD. There is a clear necessity for further education initiatives targeted to this group of physicians.

scholarly journals The patients with severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and chronic respiratory insufficiency

2016 ◽  
Vol 67 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Ambrosino ◽  
M. Di Giorgio ◽  
A. Di Paco
Keyword(s):  
Exercise Capacity ◽  
Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease ◽  
Supplemental Oxygen ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Copd Patients ◽  
Chronic Respiratory Insufficiency ◽  
Global Initiative ◽  
End Stage

Caring for patients with Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) stages III and IV with chronic respiratory failure is difficult independent of whether the target is survival or quality of life (QOL). The role of inhaled drug therapy in this specific set of very severe COPD patients has not previously been assessed. The only drug able to prolong survival in these patients is long term oxygen therapy, whereas there is little evidence to indicate long term domiciliary mechanical ventilation in the routine management of stable hypercapnic patients. Supplemental oxygen during exercise reduces exercise breathlessness and improves exercise capacity of the hypoxaemic patient. Pulmonary rehabilitation including nutritional supplementation is a significant component of therapy, even in these severe patients. Relief of dyspnoea with drugs such as morphine should not be denied to severely disabled patients who share poor QOL with cancer patients. Non-invasive ventilation has been used as a palliative treatment to reduce dyspnoea. Lung Volume Reduction Surgery may improve mortality, exercise capacity, and QOL in selected patients, but is associated with significant morbidity and an early mortality rate in the most severe patients. Lung transplantation is a final step in end-stage patients, but short- and long-term outcomes remain significantly inferior in relation to other “solid” organs recipients.

scholarly journals Implications of using the GLI-2012, GOLD and Australian COPD-X recommendations in assessing the severity of airflow limitation on spirometry among an Indigenous population with COPD: an Indigenous Australians perspective study

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. e001135
Author(s):  
Subash Heraganahally ◽  
Timothy P Howarth ◽  
Elisha White ◽  
Helmi Ben Saad
Keyword(s):  
Indigenous Population ◽  
Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease ◽  
Forced Expiratory Volume ◽  
Airflow Limitation ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Indigenous Australians ◽  
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Reference Equations ◽  
Global Initiative ◽  
Lower Limit Of Normal

BackgroundAssessment of airflow limitation (AFL) is crucial in the clinical evaluation of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, in the absence of normative reference values among adult Australian Indigenous population, the implications of utilising the Global Lung Function Initiative (GLI-2012), Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) and the Australian concise COPD-X recommended severity classifications is not known. Moreover, spirometry values (forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)) are observed to be 20%–30% lower in an apparently healthy Indigenous population in comparison to Caucasian counterparts.MethodsAdult Indigenous patients diagnosed to have COPD on spirometry (postbronchodilator (BD) FEV1/FVC <0.7 ((GOLD, (COPD-X)) and ≤lower limit of normal (others/mixed reference equations) for GLI-2012) were assessed for AFL severity classifications on Post-BD FEV1 values (mild, moderate, severe, very severe) as per the recommended classifications.ResultsFrom a total of 742 unique patient records of Indigenous Australians, 253 were identified to have COPD via GOLD/COPD-X criteria (n=238) or GLI-2012 criteria (n=238) with significant agreeance between criteria (96%, κ=0.901). Of these, the majority were classified as having moderate or severe/very-severe AFL with significant variability across classification criteria (COPD-X (40%–43%), GOLD (33%–65%), GLI-2012 (18%–75%)). The FVC and FEV1 values also varied significantly between classification criterion (COPD-X/GOLD/GLI-2012) within the same AFL category, with COPD-X ‘moderate’ AFL almost matching ‘severe’ AFL categorisation by GOLD or GLI-2012.ConclusionsHealth professionals caring for Indigenous patients with COPD should be aware of the clinical implications and consequences of utilising various recommended AFL classifications in the absence of validated spirometry reference norms among adult Indigenous patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document