The Impact of Rivaroxaban and Apixaban on Tacrolimus Trough Levels

The solid organ transplant community is slow to adopt the routine practice of using direct oral anticoagulants. Rivaroxaban and apixaban share common metabolic pathways with tacrolimus. This study aimed to clarify the impact of rivaroxaban/apixaban on tacrolimus troughs. Fifty solid organ transplant recipients with concomitant use of tacrolimus and rivaroxaban/apixaban were retrospectively assessed for changes in tacrolimus troughs and dose. Average dose-adjusted tacrolimus troughs and average tacrolimus total daily doses prior to and after rivaroxaban/apixaban initiation were compared. Subgroup analyses evaluating rivaroxaban and apixaban individually were performed. Rivaroxaban was prescribed to 18 recipients, and apixaban was prescribed to 32 recipients. Transplanted organs included kidney (n = 22), lung (n = 18), liver (n = 7), simultaneous pancreas and kidney (n = 1), and simultaneous kidney and liver (n = 2). The median doseadjusted tacrolimus trough and tacrolimus total daily dose prior to rivaroxaban/apixaban initiation was 2.15 ng/mL/mg (IQR 1.17, 3.37) and 4 mg (IQR 1.88, 6.25), respectively. The median dose-adjusted tacrolimus trough and tacrolimus total daily dose after rivaroxaban/apixaban initiation was 2.16 ng/mL/mg (IQR 1.24, 4.10) and 3.55 mg (IQR 1.5, 6.35), respectively. No significant difference was found between average dose-adjusted tacrolimus troughs or tacrolimus total daily doses before and after rivaroxaban/apixaban initiation or in the individual subgroup analyses for rivaroxaban/apixaban. It is unlikely that initiating rivaroxaban/apixaban affects tacrolimus troughs or requires tacrolimus dose adjustment. This study does not elucidate if tacrolimus affects rivaroxaban/apixaban pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics.

Download Full-text

The Impact ofClostridium difficileInfection on Future Outcomes of Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology ◽

10.1017/ice.2018.48 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 39 (5) ◽

pp. 563-570 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

Ruihong Luo ◽

Janice M. Weinberg ◽

Tamar F. Barlam

Keyword(s):

Organ Transplant ◽

Solid Organ Transplant ◽

Control Group ◽

Solid Organ ◽

Increased Risk ◽

Significant Difference ◽

First Occurrence ◽

Future Outcomes ◽

The Impact

OBJECTIVEClostridium difficileinfection (CDI) is common in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients, but few studies have examined long-term outcomes. We studied the impact of CDI after SOT on mortality and transplant organ complication-related hospitalizations (TOH).METHODSSOT recipients ≥18 years of age with at least 1 year of posttransplant data were analyzed using the MarketScan database for 2007–2014. Patients who died within one year of transplant were followed until death. Patients were grouped as early CDI (ie, first occurrence ≤90 days posttransplant), late CDI (ie, first occurrence >90 days posttransplant) and controls (ie, no CDI occurrence during follow-up). The risk of mortality or TOH after CDI was evaluated using Cox and logistic regressions, respectively.RESULTSOverall, 96 patients had early CDI, 97 patients had late CDI, and 5,913 patients were used as controls. The risk for death was significantly higher in the early CDI group than the control group (hazard ratio [HR],1.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12–3.29;P=.018); there was no significant difference between the late CDI group and the control group (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.38–1.94;P=.717). Both the early CDI group (odds ratio [OR], 2.19; 95% CI, 1.45–3.31;P<.001) and the late CDI group (OR, 4.36; 95% CI, 2.84–6.71;P<.001) had higher risk for TOH than the control group. For those patients who survived >90 days posttransplant, both the early CDI group (n=89) and the late CDI group (n=97) had increased risk for death or TOH during follow-up than the control group (n=5,734).CONCLUSIONThough our study could not prove causality, both early and late CDI occurrence in SOT recipients were associated with worse future outcomes than for SOT recipients without CDI.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol2018;39:563–570

Download Full-text

#74: Development of a Solid-Organ Transplant-Specific Antibiogram in a Tertiary Pediatric Hospital in Canada

Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society ◽

10.1093/jpids/piaa170.001 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 10 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S1-S1

Author(s):

T Kitano ◽

M Science ◽

N Nalli ◽

K Timberlake ◽

U Allen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Treatment Guidelines ◽

Organ Transplant ◽

Solid Organ Transplant ◽

Lower Sensitivity ◽

Solid Organ ◽

Pediatric Hospital ◽

Post Transplant ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Organ Specific ◽

Wide Population

Abstract Background Solid-organ transplant (SOT) patients are more vulnerable to infections by antimicrobial-resistant organisms (AROs) because of their hospital exposure, compromised immune systems, and antimicrobial exposure. Therefore, it may be useful for transplant facilities to create transplant-specific antibiograms to direct empirical antimicrobial regimens and monitor trends in antimicrobial resistance. Methods SOT (i.e., lung, liver, renal, and heart) antibiograms were created using antimicrobial susceptibility data on isolates from 2012 to 2018 at The Hospital for Sick Children, a tertiary pediatric hospital and transplant center in Toronto, Ontario. The Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines were followed to generate the antibiograms. The first clinical isolate of a species from a patient in each year was included irrespective of body site; duplicates were eliminated and surveillance cultures were excluded. Results from 2 years of data were pooled on a rolling basis to achieve an adequate sample size in both SOT and hospital-wide antibiogram. The SOT antibiogram was then compared with the hospital-wide antibiogram of the compatible 2 pooled years from 2012 to 2018. For subgroup analyses in the SOT population, organ-specific antibiograms and transplant timing-specific antibiograms (pretransplant, post-transplant <1 year, and post-transplant ≥1 year) between transplant and sample collection dates were analyzed. All proportions were compared using the χ 2 test. Results The top 5 organisms in one (2 year) analysis period of the SOT antibiogram were Escherichia coli (n = 29), Staphylococcus aureus (n = 28), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 20), Enterobacter cloacae complex (n = 18), and Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 17). For E.coli, susceptibility in the SOT antibiogram was significantly lower than those in the hospital-wide antibiogram in 2017/2018 for ampicillin (27% vs. 48%; P = 0.015), piperacillin/tazobactam (55% vs. 87%; P < 0.001), cefotaxime (59% vs. 88%; P < 0.001), ciprofloxacin (71% vs. 87%; P = 0.007) and cotrimoxazole (41% vs. 69%; P < 0.001), but not significantly different for gentamicin (94% vs. 91%; P = 0.490), tobramycin (88% vs. 90%; P = 0.701) and amikacin (100% vs. 99%; P = 0.558). These findings were consistent throughout the study period in E.coli. There was no statistically significant difference between the SOT and hospital-wide antibiograms for other organisms. There were no significant differences in susceptibility between organ-specific antibiograms or transplant timing-specific antibiograms in 2012–2018. Conclusions We found that E.coli from the SOT population had a significantly lower sensitivity to all antimicrobials, except aminoglycosides, compared with those from the hospital-wide population. Other organisms had similar susceptibility to the hospital-wide population. Developing a SOT antibiogram will assist in revising and improving empiric treatment guidelines for this population.

Download Full-text

Does Post-Transplant Cytomegalovirus Increase the Risk of Invasive Aspergillosis in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Journal of Fungi ◽

10.3390/jof7050327 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 7 (5) ◽

pp. 327

Author(s):

Nipat Chuleerarux ◽

Achitpol Thongkam ◽

Kasama Manothummetha ◽

Saman Nematollahi ◽

Veronica Dioverti-Prono ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Invasive Aspergillosis ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Organ Transplant ◽

Solid Organ Transplant ◽

Effect Estimate ◽

Solid Organ ◽

Post Transplant ◽

Cmv Disease ◽

The Impact

Background: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) and invasive aspergillosis (IA) cause high morbidity and mortality in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. There are conflicting data with respect to the impact of CMV on IA development in SOT recipients. Methods: A literature search was conducted from existence through to 2 April 2021 using MEDLINE, Embase, and ISI Web of Science databases. This review contained observational studies including cross-sectional, prospective cohort, retrospective cohort, and case-control studies that reported SOT recipients with post-transplant CMV (exposure) and without post-transplant CMV (non-exposure) who developed or did not develop subsequent IA. A random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled effect estimate. Results: A total of 16 studies were included for systematic review and meta-analysis. There were 5437 SOT patients included in the study, with 449 SOT recipients developing post-transplant IA. Post-transplant CMV significantly increased the risk of subsequent IA with pORs of 3.31 (2.34, 4.69), I2 = 30%. Subgroup analyses showed that CMV increased the risk of IA development regardless of the study period (before and after 2003), types of organ transplantation (intra-thoracic and intra-abdominal transplantation), and timing after transplant (early vs. late IA development). Further analyses by CMV definitions showed CMV disease/syndrome increased the risk of IA development, but asymptomatic CMV viremia/infection did not increase the risk of IA. Conclusions: Post-transplant CMV, particularly CMV disease/syndrome, significantly increased the risks of IA, which highlights the importance of CMV prevention strategies in SOT recipients. Further studies are needed to understand the impact of programmatic fungal surveillance or antifungal prophylaxis to prevent this fungal-after-viral phenomenon.

Download Full-text