scholarly journals Positional Accuracy of Treating Multiple Versus Single Vertebral Metastases With Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 231-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joe H. Chang ◽  
Arnjeet Sangha ◽  
Derek Hyde ◽  
Hany Soliman ◽  
Sten Myrehaug ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  
Planning Target Volume ◽  
Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy ◽  
Target Volume ◽  
Vertebral Metastases ◽  
Positional Accuracy ◽  
Computed Tomography Images ◽  
Organ At Risk ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Residual Errors

The aim of this study is to determine whether stereotactic body radiotherapy for multiple vertebral metastases treated with a single isocenter results in greater intrafraction errors than stereotactic body radiotherapy for single vertebral metastases and to determine whether the currently used spinal cord planning organ at risk volume and planning target volume margins are appropriate. Intrafraction errors were assessed for 65 stereotactic body radiotherapy treatments for vertebral metastases. Cone beam computed tomography images were acquired before, during, and after treatment for each fraction. Residual translational and rotational errors in patient positioning were recorded and planning organ at risk volume and planning target volume margins were calculated in each direction using this information. The mean translational residual errors were smaller for single (0.4 (0.4) mm) than for multiple vertebral metastases (0.5 (0.7) mm; P = .0019). The mean rotational residual errors were similar for single (0.3° (0.3°) and multiple vertebral metastases (0.3° (0.3°); P = .862). The maximum calculated planning organ at risk volume margin in any direction was 0.83 mm for single and 1.22 for multiple vertebral metastases. The maximum calculated planning target volume margin in any direction was 1.4 mm for single and 1.9 mm for multiple vertebral metastases. Intrafraction errors were small for both single and multiple vertebral metastases, indicating that our strategy for patient immobilization and repositioning is robust. Calculated planning organ at risk volume and planning target volume margins were smaller than our clinically employed margins, indicating that our clinical margins are appropriate.

UK audit of target volume and organ at risk delineation and dose optimisation for cervix radiotherapy treatments

2020 ◽  
Vol 93 (1110) ◽  
pp. 20190897
Author(s):  
Jennifer Cannon ◽  
Peter Bownes ◽  
Joshua Mason ◽  
Rachel Cooper
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
At Risk ◽  
Planning Target Volume ◽  
Treatment Plan ◽  
Target Volume ◽  
Dose Fractionation ◽  
Treatment Technique ◽  
Dose Optimisation ◽  
Treatment Plans ◽  
Organ At Risk

Objective: Assessment of the extent of variation in delineations and dose optimisation performed at multiple UK centres as a result of interobserver variation and protocol differences. Methods: CT/MR images of 2 cervical cancer patients previously treated with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and Brachytherapy were distributed to 11 UK centres. Centres delineated structures and produced treatment plans following their local protocol. Organ at risk delineations were assessed dosimetrically through application of the original treatment plan and target volume delineations were assessed in terms of variation in absolute volume and length, width and height. Treatment plan variation was assessed across all centres and across centres that followed EMBRACE II. Treatment plans were assessed using total EQD2 delivered and were compared to EMBRACE II dose aims. Variation in combined intracavitary/interstitial brachytherapy treatments was also assessed. Results: Brachytherapy target volume delineations contained variation due to differences in protocol used, window/level technique and differences in interpretations of grey zones. Planning target volume delineations were varied due to protocol differences and extended parametrial tissue inclusion. All centres met EMBRACE II plan aims for PTV V95 and high-riskclinical target volume D90 EQD2, despite variation in prescription dose, fractionation and treatment technique. Conclusion: Brachytherapy target volume delineations are varied due to differences in contouring guidelines and protocols used. Planning target volume delineations are varied due to the uncertainties surrounding the extent of parametrial involvement. Dosimetric optimisation is sufficient across all centres to satisfy EMBRACE II planning aims despite significant variation in protocols used. Advances in knowledge: Previous multi-institutional audits of cervical cancer radiotherapy practices have been performed in Europe and the USA. This study is the first of its kind to be performed in the UK.

scholarly journals Impact of Geometric Uncertainties on Dose Distribution During Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy of Head-and-neck Cancer: The Need for a Planning Target Volume and A Planning Organ-at-Risk Volume

2006 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 108-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. Ballivy ◽  
W. Parker ◽  
T. Vuong ◽  
G. Shenouda ◽  
H. Patrocinio
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
At Risk ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy ◽  
Target Volume ◽  
Ct Scans ◽  
Target Coverage ◽  
Geometric Uncertainties ◽  
Intensity Modulated ◽  
Organ At Risk

We assessed the effect of geometric uncertainties on target coverage and on dose to the organs at risk (OARS) during intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for head-and-neck cancer, and we estimated the required margins for the planning target volume (PTV) and the planning organ-at-risk volume (PRV). For eight headand- neck cancer patients, we generated IMRT plans with localization uncertainty margins of 0 mm, 2.5 mm, and 5.0 mm. The beam intensities were then applied on repeat computed tomography (CT) scans obtained weekly during treatment, and dose distributions were recalculated. The dose–volume histogram analysis for the repeat CT scans showed that target coverage was adequate (V100 ≥ 95%) for only 12.5% of the gross tumour volumes, 54.3% of the upper-neck clinical target volumes (CTVS), and 27.4% of the lower-neck CTVS when no margins were added for PTV. The use of 2.5-mm and 5.0-mm margins significantly improved target coverage, but the mean dose to the contralateral parotid increased from 25.9 Gy to 29.2 Gy. Maximum dose to the spinal cord was above limit in 57.7%, 34.6%, and 15.4% of cases when 0-mm, 2.5-mm, and 5.0-mm margins (respectively) were used for PRV. Significant deviations from the prescribed dose can occur during IMRT treatment delivery for headand- neck cancer. The use of 2.5-mm to 5.0-mm margins for PTV and PRV greatly reduces the risk of underdosing targets and of overdosing the spinal cord.

scholarly journals Use of a Head-Tilting Baseplate During Tomotherapy to Shorten the Irradiation Time and Protect the Hippocampus and Lens in Hippocampal Sparing-Whole Brain Radiotherapy

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. 153303382098682
Author(s):  
Kosei Miura ◽  
Hiromasa Kurosaki ◽  
Nobuko Utsumi ◽  
Hideyuki Sakurai
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  
Planning Target Volume ◽  
Irradiation Time ◽  
Organs At Risk ◽  
Absorbed Dose ◽  
Whole Brain Radiotherapy ◽  
Target Volume ◽  
Whole Brain ◽  
Brain Radiotherapy ◽  
Hippocampal Sparing

Purpose: The aim of this study is to comparatively examine the possibility of reducing the exposure dose to organs at risk, such as the hippocampus and lens, and improving the dose distribution of the planned target volume with and without the use of a head-tilting base plate in hippocampal-sparing whole-brain radiotherapy using tomotherapy. Methods: Five paired images of planned head computed tomography without and with tilt were analyzed. The hippocampus and planning target volume were contoured according to the RTOG 0933 contouring atlas protocol. The hippocampal zone to be avoided was delineated using a 5-mm margin. The prescribed radiation dose was 30 Gy in 10 fractions. The absorbed dose to planning target volume dose, absorbed dose to the organ at risk, and irradiation time were evaluated. The paired t-test was used to analyze the differences between hippocampal-sparing whole-brain radiotherapy with head tilts and without head tilts. Results: Hippocampal-sparing whole-brain radiotherapy with tilt was not superior in planning target volume doses using the homogeneity index than that without tilt; however, it showed better values, and for Dmean and D2%, the values were closer to 30 Gy. Regarding the hippocampus, dose reduction with tilt was significantly greater at Dmax, Dmean, and Dmin, whereas regarding the lens, it was significantly greater at Dmax and Dmin. The irradiation time was also predominantly shorter. Conclusion: In our study, a tilted hippocampal-sparing whole-brain radiotherapy reduced the irradiation time by >10%. Therefore, our study indicated that hippocampal-sparing whole-brain radiotherapy with tomotherapy should be performed with a tilt. The head-tilting technique might be useful during hippocampal-sparing whole-brain radiotherapy. This method could decrease the radiation exposure time, while sparing healthy organs, including the hippocampus and lens.

scholarly journals Clinical Implementation of Proton Therapy Using Pencil-Beam Scanning Delivery Combined With Static Apertures

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Bäumer ◽  
Sandija Plaude ◽  
Dalia Ahmad Khalil ◽  
Dirk Geismar ◽  
Paul-Heinz Kramer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  
Proton Therapy ◽  
Target Volume ◽  
Delivery Mode ◽  
Pencil Beam ◽  
Clinical Implementation ◽  
Beam Scanning ◽  
Pencil Beam Scanning ◽  
Spot Scanning ◽  
The Mean

Proton therapy makes use of the favorable depth-dose distribution with its characteristic Bragg peak to spare normal tissue distal of the target volume. A steep dose gradient would be desired in lateral dimensions, too. The widespread spot scanning delivery technique is based, however, on pencil-beams with in-air spot full-widths-at-half-maximum of typically 1 cm or more. This hampers the sparing of organs-at-risk if small-scale structures adjacent to the target volume are concerned. The trimming of spot scanning fields with collimating apertures constitutes a simple measure to increase the transversal dose gradient. The current study describes the clinical implementation of brass apertures in conjunction with the pencil-beam scanning delivery mode at a horizontal, clinical treatment head based on commercial hardware and software components. Furthermore, clinical cases, which comprised craniopharyngiomas, re-irradiations and ocular tumors, were evaluated. The dosimetric benefits of 31 treatment plans using apertures were compared to the corresponding plans without aperture. Furthermore, an overview of the radiation protection aspects is given. Regarding the results, robust optimization considering range and setup uncertainties was combined with apertures. The treatment plan optimizations followed a single-field uniform dose or a restricted multi-field optimization approach. Robustness evaluation was expanded to account for possible deviations of the center of the pencil-beam delivery and the mechanical center of the aperture holder. Supplementary apertures improved the conformity index on average by 15.3%. The volume of the dose gradient surrounding the PTV (evaluated between 80 and 20% dose levels) was decreased on average by 17.6%. The mean dose of the hippocampi could be reduced on average by 2.9 GyRBE. In particular cases the apertures facilitated a sparing of an organ-at-risk, e.g. the eye lens or the brainstem. For six craniopharyngioma cases the inclusion of apertures led to a reduction of the mean dose of 1.5 GyRBE (13%) for the brain and 3.1 GyRBE (16%) for the hippocampi.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document