Comparing the Efficacy of Radiation Free Machine-Vision Image-Guided Surgery With Traditional 2-Dimensional Fluoroscopy: : A Randomized, Single-Center Study

2021 ◽  
pp. 155633162110298
Author(s):  
Jessica Dorilio ◽  
Nicole Utah ◽  
Christina Dowe ◽  
Fedan Avrumova ◽  
Daniel Alicea ◽  
...  

Background: Three-dimensional (3D) computer-assisted navigation (CAN) has emerged as a potential alternative to 2-dimensional (2D) fluoroscopy in the surgical placement of spinal instrumentation. Recently, 3D-CAN systems have improved significantly in their ability to provide real-time anatomical referencing while shortening the registration and set-up time. A novel system in navigation, Machine-Vision Image-Guided Surgery (MvIGS; 7D Surgical, Toronto, Canada) was cleared by the US Food and Drug Administration, but its potential benefits in reducing intra-operative radiation exposure to patients and enhancing surgical accuracy of pedicle screw placement are not fully known. Purpose: We sought to conduct a prospective, randomized, clinical study comparing the 3D-MvIGS spinal navigation system and 2D-fluoroscopy for pedicle screw insertion up to 3 levels (T10-S1) and for various measures of surgical efficacy. Methods: Sixty-two eligible patients were randomized to receive spine surgery using either the 3D-MvIGS group or the conventional 2D-fluoroscopy for pedicle screw fixation for the treatment of spinal stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis. Intra-operative parameters and procedure-related unintended protocol violations were recorded. Results: Operative time and estimated blood loss were not significantly different between groups. Radiation time and exposure to patients were significantly reduced in the 3D-MvIGS group. There was no difference between groups in pedicle screw placement accuracy (2D-fluoroscopy group, 96.6%; 3D-MvIGS group, 94.2%). There were no major complications or cases that required revision surgery. Conclusion: The 3D-MvIGS navigation system performed comparably with 2D-fluoroscopy in terms of pedicle screw placement accuracy and operative time. The 3D-MvIGS showed a significant reduction in radiation exposure to patients. In more complex cases or larger cohorts, the true value of greater anatomical visualization can be elucidated.

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (6) ◽  
pp. 2386-2397 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paerhati Rexiti ◽  
Yakufu Abulizi ◽  
Aikeremujiang Muheremu ◽  
Shuiquan Wang ◽  
Maierdan Maimaiti ◽  
...  

Objective To study the clinical application of lumbar isthmus parameters in guiding pedicle screw placement. Methods Lumbar isthmus parameters were measured in normal lumbar x-rays and cadaveric specimens from a Chinese Han population. Distance between the medial pedicle border and lateral isthmus border was recorded as a ‘D’ value and was compared between X-rays and cadavers. Orthopaedic surgeons estimated different distances (2–6 mm) and angles (5–20°), and bias ratios between estimated and real values were compared. Orthopaedic residents placed pedicle screws on cadaveric specimens before and after application of the ‘D’ value, and screw placement accuracy was compared. Results Except for L4 vertebrae, significant differences in the ‘D’ value were found between 25 cadaveric specimens and x-ray films from 120 patients. Distances and angles estimated by 40 surgeons were significantly different from all real values, except 2 mm distance. Accuracy of pedicle screw placement by six orthopaedic residents was significantly improved by applying the ‘D’ value. Conclusions Surgeon estimates of distance were more accurate than angle estimates. Addition of a ‘D’ value to conventional parameters may significantly improve pedicle screw placement accuracy in lumbar spine surgery.


Author(s):  
Tomohisa Inoue ◽  
Keiji Wada ◽  
Ayako Tominaga ◽  
Ryo Tamaki ◽  
Tomoya Hirota ◽  
...  

Spine ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 44 (21) ◽  
pp. E1272-E1280
Author(s):  
Arjun V. Pendharkar ◽  
Paymon G. Rezaii ◽  
Allen L. Ho ◽  
Eric S. Sussman ◽  
Anand Veeravagu ◽  
...  

Neurosurgery ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 530-530 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin T. Foley ◽  
Ramesh L. Sahjpaul ◽  
Gerald R. Rodts

Neurosurgery ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 66 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jordan Cory ◽  
Mohammed A Awad ◽  
Richard G Bittar

Abstract INTRODUCTION Robot-assisted surgery has emerged as an innovative and minimally-invasive technique, touted as superior to the traditional free-hand technique of pedicle screw fixation in spinal fusion surgery. Complications of misplaced pedicle screws include inadequate fixation and surgical failure requiring revision, neural injury, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, vascular injury, and facet joint trauma with sequela of adjacent segment disease. Literature reports an incidence of pedicle screw misplacement in up to 10% with free-hand technique. Robot-assisted surgery has reported superiority with increased accuracy of pedicle screw placement and reduced complication rates. This prospective multi-institutional single cohort analysis reports the outcomes in robot-assisted spinal fusion surgery in Melbourne, Australia over 4 yr. METHODS Data was prospectively collected from 2015 to 2019 from robot-assisted spinal surgeries performed by 2 surgeons across 2 institutions. Postoperative spinal computed tomography (CT) scan was compared to preoperative CT based planning to determine the accuracy of pedicle screw placement to 0.1 mm. Accurate pedicle screw placement was defined as within 2.0 mm from the target. Intraoperative radiation exposure time, operative time and length of hospital stay were also collected. RESULTS The total number of cases was 164 and the total number of screws placed was 744. Accurate pedicle screw placement was 98.65%. Average intraoperative radiation exposure time was 9.9 s. Average operative time for single-level surgery was 74 min. The average length of hospital stay was 2.4 d. CONCLUSION The authors conclude that robot-assisted pedicle screw placement is a safe and highly accurate adjunct to spinal surgery. While robot-assisted spinal surgery significantly improves patient outcomes with reduced patient morbidity and revision rates, it has limitations in primary capital expenditure, consumable costs and, in training and accreditation. It is the authors’ opinion that the robot-assisted spinal surgery technique requires nuanced patient selection and expertise in the traditional free-hand method is still essential in the event of technological failure.


Author(s):  
Hsuan-Yu Chen ◽  
Xiu-Yun Xiao ◽  
Chih-Wei Chen ◽  
Hao-Kai Chou ◽  
Chen-Yu Sung ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 990-1004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed A. Aoude ◽  
Maryse Fortin ◽  
Rainer Figueiredo ◽  
Peter Jarzem ◽  
Jean Ouellet ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 279-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
AUGUSTINUS LUDWIG JACOB ◽  
PETER MESSMER ◽  
ACHIM KAIM ◽  
NORBERT SUHM ◽  
PIETRO REGAZZONI ◽  
...  

Spine ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. E188-E194 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Noelle Larson ◽  
Edward R. G. Santos ◽  
David W. Polly ◽  
Charles G. T. Ledonio ◽  
Jonathan N. Sembrano ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document