Evaluation of lipid-bound sialic acid (LSA) as a tumor marker

1995 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 174-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.J. B. López Sáez ◽  
A. Senra-Varela

The objective of this study is the evaluation of serum levels of lipid-bound sialic acid (LSA) as a of marker cancer. This is a case-control study, and the levels of LSA were determined with blinded duplicates of cases and controls. Histologic verification of all cancer cases was used to confirm the diagnosis. The study included 135 patients with cancer (breast carcinoma, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, lung cancer and gastrointestinal cancer) and 95 controls (57 normal subjects and 38 with chronic non-malignant diseases). Marker determination was done by the spectrophotometric procedure of Katopodis with resorcinol. The mean LSA level in the 57 healthy individuals was 15.09 mg/dl (95% C.I., 13.51-16.67), in the entire control group of 95 non-tumoral individuals it was 19.21 mg/dl (17.18-21.24), and in the 135 cancer patients it was 26.64 mg/dl (24.42-28.87). There was a statistically significant difference between patients with chronic non-tumoral diseases and healthy individuals (p<0.001) and also between cancer patients and healthy individuals (p<0.001), but not between cancer patients and patients with chronic non-tumoral diseases (p>0.05). The mean LSA serum values related to tumor site were (mg/dl): breast cancer, 21.49; gastrointestinal tumors, 28.45; head and neck cancer, 28.61 and lung cancer, 32.54. The means according to clinical stage were: complete remission, 18.50, significantly higher than the healthy controls (p<0.05); local disease, 23.50 (p<0.01); locoregional disease, (p<0.05); local disease, 23.50 (p < 0.01); locoregional disease, 27.21 (p < 0.001); metastatic disease, 34.49 (p < 0.001), and relapses, 20.87 (p<0.05). When comparing patients with clinically active cancer with healthy persons, the estimated cutoff value was 19.1 mg/dl, with a sensitivity of 74.7% and a specificity of 74.7%. We conclude that LSA values increase in cases of clinically active cancer and decrease in complete remission. LSA is of great value as a tumor marker in the diagnosis of disease extent.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 155-155
Author(s):  
Kishan Shani ◽  
Michael Borean ◽  
Judy Chen ◽  
Yuchen Li ◽  
M. Catherine Brown ◽  
...  

155 Background: In Ontario, Canada, longitudinal patient self-reporting of 9 common cancer symptoms and a global health scale (Edmonton Symptom Assessment System, ESAS) is mandated and used clinically as a screening tool for multidisciplinary precision care (chemo/rads/surg). However, a common GI symptom, dysphagia, is not assessed in the same setting. Methods: Mostly gastro-esophageal cancer outpatients (some head and neck and lung cancer patients undergoing radiation were also included for generalizability) received one of two versions (V1, V2) of the dysphagia screening tool based on PRO-CTCAE-derived language. The tool included two screening questions, which when answered affirmatively, led to more comprehensive dysphagia/odynophagia questioning. The survey was introduced on iPads with V1. An assessment of acceptability through patient survey was additionally included in V2, and the duration of survey completion was recorded. Exploratory in-depth interviews were conducted with oncologists to assess usability in the clinic setting. Results: Of 101 approached and eligible, 79 consented, and 66 completed the survey. Median completion time was 2.12 ± 0.80 min. 95% were happy to complete survey on a touchscreen tablet, 88% did not find completion of survey time-consuming, and 91% found completion of survey useful in order to tell the clinician how they feel physically and emotionally. The prevalence of dysphagia based on screening question #1 (“difficulty upon swallowing?”) was 38% (25/66), while for screening question #2 (“pain upon swallowing?”) prevalence was 18% (12/66). Five interviewed physicians found the survey to be clinically informative, not burdensome in terms of time consumption, and felt it would be a valuable addition to outpatient clinics. One recurring suggestion was to combine the two screening questions into one. Results were similar across GI, head and neck, and lung cancer sites. Conclusions: The e-PRO dysphagia screening tool is acceptable and feasible for patients, and useful for clinicians. Next, a modified one-question dysphagia tool will be assessed in the multidisciplinary care of gastro-esophageal cancer patients.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e17519-e17519
Author(s):  
Sachin Dhumal ◽  
Vijay Maruti Patil ◽  
Vanita Noronha ◽  
Amit Joshi ◽  
Atanu Bhattacharjee ◽  
...  

e17519 Background: NACT (neoadjuvant chemotherapy) is one of the treatment options in advanced head and neck cancer (H&N cancer); however there is limited quality of life data available in these patients. Methods: Between August 2013- April 2014, 90 technically unresectable H&N cancer patients who were underwent NACT at our centre were selected for this analysis. EORTC QLQ-C30 and HN35 version 3.0 was used for quality of life assessment at baseline and after 02 cycles of NACT. PFS and OS was estimated by Kaplan Meier method. The mean change in QOL at various domains was calculated with 95% CI. The relationship between change in QOL domain and OS was analysed. Results: The median age of the cohort was 45 years (Range 21-65 years). The predominant subsite was oral cavity, in 62 patients (68.9%).The median PFS and OS was 10.53 months (95%CI 8.1-13.0) and 20.8 months (95%CI 15.1-26.5). The mean scores for all domains of QOL are shown in table 1. Conclusions: NACT leads to improvement in QOL in patients treated with head and neck cancers and its has impact on OS.[Table: see text]


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15558-e15558
Author(s):  
Hyun Koo Kim ◽  
Byeong Hyeon Choi ◽  
Yu Hua Quan ◽  
Jiyun Rho ◽  
Sunghoi Hong ◽  
...  

e15558 Background: Exosome concentration is known to be higher in cancer patients than in healthy individuals. In this study, we observed that the levels of exosomes differ in tumor-draining pulmonary blood and in peripheral blood in animal models and human subjects at different pathological stages of lung cancer. Methods: Ten rabbits and 40 humans formed the study cohorts. Blood was collected from a peripheral vein in all groups, and pulmonary blood was collected intraoperatively from all groups, except the healthy human controls. Quantitative analysis of exosomes was performed by nanoparticle tracking assay, CD63 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and western blotting. Results: The peripheral blood of lung cancer-bearing animals and patients with lung cancer carried higher amounts of exosome than that from healthy controls ( p < 0.01 and p < 0.001, respectively). Moreover, pulmonary blood from lung cancer-bearing animals and patients had significantly higher exosome levels, compared to preoperative peripheral blood ( p < 0.01 and p < 0.0001, respectively). In patients, pulmonary exosome levels showed higher correlation with pathological stages of lung cancer than the peripheral exosome levels. Conclusions: Exosome levels increased with increasing grade of lung cancer, and this trend was more prominent in the pulmonary than in the peripheral blood.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21740-e21740
Author(s):  
Salma Ait Batahar

e21740 Background: Lung cancer is the first cause of death by cancer worldwide. Brain metastases in lung cancer are associated to an even poorer prognosis of this cancer. Identifying patients with a higher risk of developing brain cancer may help their prognosis by including systematic brain radiotherapy to their treatment. But what are risk factors of brain metastasis occurrence in lung cancer patients? Methods: To answer this question, we conducted a case control study comparing two groups of lung cancer patients. The cases group included 35 lung cancer patients with brain metastasis at the moment of diagnosis while the control group was made of 49 lung cancer patient with no brain metastasis at the moment of diagnosis. Many parameters were compared between the two groups such as: professional exposure, type and duration of smoking, medical history, clinical and radiological presentation as well as the histological type of the carcinoma. Results: The mean age was 56 for the cases group and 61 for the control group. Nonsmokers represented 14% in the cases group and 4% in the control group. The average smoking was 34 pack-year for the cases group and 31 pack-year for the control group and in both groups 51% of patients smoked a mixture of tobacco and Cannabis. 36% of the control group patients had an exposure to a professional carcinogen while 48% of the cases group patients had one. Digital clubbing was found in 62% of cases group patients and in 51% of the control group patients. 17% of the cases group patients had two more metastases outside the lungs and other than the brain ones while this rate was only 6% for the control group patients. The mean level of LDH (Lactate Dehydrogenase) was 340 U/L for the cases group and 342 U/L for the control group while the CRP (C- reactive protein) one was 78 mg/L for the cases group and 59 mg/L for the control group. The main histological type found in both groups was Adenocarcinoma (25% in the cases group and 18% in the control group) followed by the poorly differentiated carcinoma in the cases group and the squamous cell carcinoma in the control group. Small cell carcinoma was found in 5% of the patients with brain metastases and in 8% of the patients without brain metastases. Conclusions: Patients with brain metastases have a higher professional carcinogens exposure, a higher percentage of nonsmokers, more digital clubbing, and higher CRP levels than patients with no brain metastases. They also have more than one metastasis at the moment of the diagnosis and the predominant histological types are Adenocarcinoma and poorly differentiated carcinoma.


2014 ◽  
Vol 111 ◽  
pp. S53
Author(s):  
V.R. Bollineni ◽  
M.J.B Koole ◽  
J. Pruim ◽  
E.M. Wiegman ◽  
H.J.M. Groen ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document