Privacy and Security: Are Your Health Information Systems up to Standard?

1996 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 197-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tina Magennis ◽  
Jennifer Mitchell

As electronic patient health information systems become more fully developed and widespread, there are persistent concerns about the privacy and confidentiality of the personal health data being stored and disseminated. Standards Australia has released two Standards which provide useful guidelines for the organisational, technological and human behaviour solutions required to protect privacy and confidentiality in health care organisations. The major requirements of these Standards are outlined and the implications of the Standards for health information managers are discussed.

2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (01) ◽  
pp. 037-040 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eike-Henner Kluge ◽  
Paulette Lacroix ◽  
Pekka Ruotsalainen

Objectives: To provide a model for ensuring the ethical acceptability of the provisions that characterize the interjurisdictional use of eHealth, telemedicine, and associated modalities of health care delivery that are currently in place. Methods: Following the approach initiated in their Global Protection of Health Data project within the Security in Health Information Systems (SiHIS) working group of the International Medical Informatics Association (IMIA), the authors analyze and evaluate relevant privacy and security approaches that are intended to stem the erosion of patients' trustworthiness in the handling of their sensitive information by health care and informatics professionals in the international context. Results: The authors found that while the majority of guidelines and ethical codes essentially focus on the role and functioning of the institutions that use EHRs and information technologies, little if any attention has been paid to the qualifications of the health informatics professionals (HIPs) who actualize and operate information systems to deal with or address relevant ethical issues. Conclusion: The apparent failure to address this matter indicates that the ethical qualification of HIPs remains an important security issue and that the Global Protection of Health Data project initiated by the SiHIS working group in 2015 should be expanded to develop into an internationally viable method of certification. An initial model to this effect is sketched and discussed.


2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  

Abstract Health information systems have not kept up with the demands and needs created by the sharp rise in human mobility over the past three decades. Most health information systems operate in national silos, and fail to provide a fully accurate, reliable and timely picture of the health and health care situation of a world on the move. As such, health needs of a large number of international migrants go unrecognized, and health systems fail to produce the evidence required for migrant-sensitive service planning, monitoring and public health action. The generation of such essential evidence relies on the inclusion of migrant health in health information systems in a consistent, comparable and ethically acceptable manner. A high-level consensus conference in Pecs (October 2019) noted the need for greater harmonisation and international cooperation on migrant health information systems, including data collection, analysis and dissemination. Taking the status quo of health information systems as a starting point, the workshop aims to present steps towards health system reforms which make information systems more sensitive and responsive to the health needs of increasingly mobile human populations. To this end, the workshop brings together researchers, policy makers and health professionals from different fields and institutions, to share existing knowledge, and by jointly exploring the following questions: What measures can we take to facilitate the harmonisation of migrant health indicators and data collection methods to ensure cross-border comparability, compatibility and completeness of data?How can we effectively improve international cooperation and governance of data management in order to share and transfer data for reasonable analysis, advocacy, and action?How can we initiate health systems reforms towards the above aims, considering that health systems are complex adaptive social constructs which are often resistant to change and not linear?What ethical and data protection considerations must be made when collecting, analysing and sharing migrant health data?How can build the required human resource capacities? Key messages Evidence based development of ‘migrant sensitive health care system’ requires specific, consistent and comparable health data Health systems harmonization on the field of migration requires supportive policy, guidance, infrastructure and trained human resources


2018 ◽  
Vol 119 (7/8) ◽  
pp. 358-376
Author(s):  
Cathrine Tambudzai Nengomasha ◽  
Ruth Abankwah ◽  
Wilhelm Uutoni ◽  
Lilian Pazvakawambwa

Purpose This paper aims to report some findings of a study that investigated health information systems (HISs) in Namibia with a view of establishing the nature of these systems and coming up with recommendations on how these could be enhanced. Design/methodology/approach This study applied a mixed methods research approach, using interviews and survey questionnaire to collect data. Survey data were analysed for descriptive statistics using SPSS and data from interviews were analysed applying content analysis for data analysis. Findings The findings of this study indicate fragmented HISs resulting in duplication of diagnosis, tests and treatment. The findings show that there were errors in capturing data into the systems, which could compromise the reliability of the data and compromise service delivery. Research limitations/implications This study was limited to two (Khomas and Oshana) of the fourteen regions in Namibia; therefore, further studies could look at other regions, as the study findings cannot be generalised to the entire country. Practical implications The findings and recommendations, particularly those relating to the public health sector, could inform policies and procedures, especially those relating to the patient health passport (card), and the way health information is shared within and across health sectors. Originality/value This study focused on health information sharing, whereas a previous study on HISs concentrated on quality of healthcare.


2017 ◽  
Vol 56 (S 01) ◽  
pp. e20-e29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Najeeb Al-Shorbaji ◽  
Elizabeth Borycki ◽  
Michio Kimura ◽  
Christoph Lehmann ◽  
Nancy Lorenzi ◽  
...  

SummaryThis article is part of a For-Discussion-Section of Methods of Information in Medicine about the paper “Representation of People’s Decisions in Health Information Systems: A Complementary Approach for Understanding Health Care Systems and Population Health” written by Fernan Gonzalez Bernaldo de Qui-ros, Adriana Ruth Dawidowski, and Silvana Figar. It is introduced by an editorial. This article contains the combined commentaries invited to independently comment on the paper of de Quiros, Dawidowski, and Figar. In subsequent issues the discussion can continue through letters to the editor.


2010 ◽  
Vol 19 (01) ◽  
pp. 30-33
Author(s):  
C. Bréant ◽  

Summary Objectives: Summarize excellent current research in the field of Health Information Systems. Method: Synopsis of the articles selected for the IMIA Yearbook 2010. Results: Five papers from international peer reviewed journals have been selected for the section on health information systems. Conclusions: The elected articles illustrate how health care IT alignment, assessment and benchmarking have become a challenge and a key aspect to the strengthening of health information systems in order to maintain and expand the objectives and strategies of organizations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document