scholarly journals Validation of the International Classification of Disease 10th Revision Codes for Kidney Transplant Rejection and Failure

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 205435812097739
Author(s):  
David Massicotte-Azarniouch ◽  
Manish M. Sood ◽  
Dean A. Fergusson ◽  
Greg A. Knoll
Keyword(s):  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Chart Review ◽  
Transplant Rejection ◽  
Graft Loss ◽  
International Classification ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Kidney Transplant Recipients ◽  
International Classification Of Disease ◽  
Icd 10

Background: Clinical research requires that diagnostic codes captured from routinely collected health administrative data accurately identify individuals with a disease. Objective: In this study, we validated the International Classification of Disease 10th Revision (ICD-10) definition for kidney transplant rejection (T86.100) and for kidney transplant failure (T86.101). Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: A large, regional transplantation center in Ontario, Canada. Patients: All adult kidney transplant recipients from 2002 to 2018. Measurements: Chart review was undertaken to identify the first occurrence of biopsy-confirmed rejection and graft loss for all participants. For each observation, we determined the first date a single ICD-10 code T86.100 or T86.101 was recorded as a hospital encounter discharge diagnosis. Methods: Using chart review as the gold standard, we determined the sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV) for the ICD-10 codes T86.100 and T86.101. Results: Our study population comprised of 1,258 kidney transplant recipients. The prevalence of rejection and death-censored graft loss were 15.6 and 9.1%, respectively. For the ICD-10 rejection code (T86.100), sensitivity was 72.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 66.6-79.2), specificity 97.5% (96.5-98.4), and PPV 83.8% (78.3-89.4). For the ICD-10 graft loss code (T86.101), sensitivity was 21.2% (95% CI, 13.2-29.3), specificity 86.3% (84.3-88.3), and PPV 11.7% (7.0-16.4). Limitations: Single-center study which may limit generalizability of our findings. Conclusions: A single ICD-10 code for kidney transplant rejection (T86.100) was present in 84% of true kidney transplant rejections and is an accurate way of identifying kidney transplant recipients with rejection using administrative health data. The ICD-10 code for graft failure (T86.101) performed poorly and should not be used for administrative health research.

Immunosuppressive Management of Pediatric Kidney Transplant Recipients

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (28) ◽  
pp. 3451-3459
Author(s):  
Tomáš Seeman
Keyword(s):  
Immunosuppressive Therapy ◽  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Graft Loss ◽  
Calcineurin Inhibitors ◽  
Mtor Inhibitors ◽  
Therapeutic Drug ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Kidney Transplant Recipients

: Kidney transplantation is a preferable treatment of children with end-stage kidney disease. All kidney transplant recipients, including pediatric need immunosuppressive medications to prevent rejection episodes and graft loss. : Induction therapy is used temporarily only immediately following transplantation while maintenance immunosuppressive drugs are started and given long-term. There is currently no consensus regarding the use of induction therapy in children; its use should be decided based on the immunological risk of the child. : The recent progress shows that the recommended strategy is to use as maintenance immunosuppressive therapy a combination of a calcineurin inhibitor (preferably tacrolimus) with an antiproliferative drug (preferably mycophenolate mofetil) with steroids that can be withdrawn early or late in low-risk children. The mTOR-inhibitors (sirolimus, everolimus) are used rarely in pediatrics because of common side effects and no evidence of a benefit over calcineurin inhibitors. The use of calcineurin inhibitors, mycophenolate, and mTOR-inhibitors should be followed by therapeutic drug monitoring. : Immunosuppressive therapy of acute rejection consists of high-dose steroids and/or anti-lymphocyte antibodies (T-cell mediated rejection) or plasma exchange, intravenous immunoglobulines and/or rituximab (antibodymediated rejection). : The future strategies for research are mainly precise characterisation of children needing induction therapy, more specific indications for mTOR-inhibitors and for the far future, the possibility to reach the immuno tolerance.

scholarly journals BK Polyomavirus Micro-RNAs: Time Course and Clinical Relevance in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Viruses ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 351
Author(s):  
Baptiste Demey ◽  
Véronique Descamps ◽  
Claire Presne ◽  
Francois Helle ◽  
Catherine Francois ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Viral Replication ◽  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Graft Loss ◽  
First Year ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Kidney Transplant Recipients ◽  
Post Transplantation ◽  
Bk Polyomavirus ◽  
Micro Rnas

Background: Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) are exposed to a high risk of BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) replication, which in turn may lead to graft loss. Although the microRNAs (miRNAs) bkv-miR-B1-3p and bkv-miR-B1-5p are produced during the viral cycle, their putative value as markers of viral replication has yet to be established. In KTRs, the clinical relevance of the changes over time in BKPyV miRNA levels has not been determined. Methods: In a retrospective study, we analyzed 186 urine samples and 120 plasma samples collected from 67 KTRs during the first year post-transplantation. Using a reproducible, standardized, quantitative RT-PCR assay, we measured the levels of bkv-miR-B1-3p and bkv-miR-B1-5p (relative to the BKPyV DNA load). Results: Detection of the two miRNAs had low diagnostic value for identifying patients with DNAemia or for predicting DNAuria during follow-up. Seven of the 14 KTRs with a sustained BKPyV infection within the first year post-transplantation showed a progressive reduction in the DNA load and then a rapid disappearance of the miRNAs. DNA and miRNA loads were stable in the other seven KTRs. Conclusions: After the DNA-based diagnosis of BKPyV infection in KTRs, bkv-miR-B1-3p and bkv-miR-B1-5p levels in the urine might be valuable markers for viral replication monitoring and thus might help physicians to avoid an excessive reduction in the immunosuppressive regimen.

scholarly journals Neue Terminologie für Sprachentwicklungsstörungen?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Neumann ◽  
B. Arnold ◽  
A. Baumann ◽  
C. Bohr ◽  
H. A. Euler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
International Classification Of Diseases ◽  
International Classification ◽  
International Classification Of Disease ◽  
Diagnostik Und Therapie ◽  
Classification Of Diseases ◽  
Icd 10

Zusammenfassung Hintergrund Sprachtherapeutisch-linguistische Fachkreise empfehlen die Anpassung einer von einem internationalen Konsortium empfohlenen Änderung der Nomenklatur für Sprachstörungen im Kindesalter, insbesondere für Sprachentwicklungsstörungen (SES), auch für den deutschsprachigen Raum. Fragestellung Ist eine solche Änderung in der Terminologie aus ärztlicher und psychologischer Sicht sinnvoll? Material und Methode Kritische Abwägung der Argumente für und gegen eine Nomenklaturänderung aus medizinischer und psychologischer Sicht eines Fachgesellschaften- und Leitliniengremiums. Ergebnisse Die ICD-10-GM (Internationale statistische Klassifikation der Krankheiten und verwandter Gesundheitsprobleme, 10. Revision, German Modification) und eine S2k-Leitlinie unterteilen SES in umschriebene SES (USES) und SES assoziiert mit anderen Erkrankungen (Komorbiditäten). Die USES- wie auch die künftige SES-Definition der ICD-11 (International Classification of Diseases 11th Revision) fordern den Ausschluss von Sinnesbehinderungen, neurologischen Erkrankungen und einer bedeutsamen intellektuellen Einschränkung. Diese Definition erscheint weit genug, um leichtere nonverbale Einschränkungen einzuschließen, birgt nicht die Gefahr, Kindern Sprach- und weitere Therapien vorzuenthalten und erkennt das ICD(International Classification of Disease)-Kriterium, nach dem der Sprachentwicklungsstand eines Kindes bedeutsam unter der Altersnorm und unterhalb des seinem Intelligenzalter angemessenen Niveaus liegen soll, an. Die intendierte Ersetzung des Komorbiditäten-Begriffs durch verursachende Faktoren, Risikofaktoren und Begleiterscheinungen könnte die Unterlassung einer dezidierten medizinischen Differenzialdiagnostik bedeuten. Schlussfolgerungen Die vorgeschlagene Terminologie birgt die Gefahr, ätiologisch bedeutsame Klassifikationen und differenzialdiagnostische Grenzen zu verwischen und auf wertvolles ärztliches und psychologisches Fachwissen in Diagnostik und Therapie sprachlicher Störungen im Kindesalter zu verzichten.

Time-Varying Proteinuria and the Risk of Cardiovascular Disease and Graft Failure in Kidney Transplant Recipients

2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 288-297
Author(s):  
Tanya Kuper ◽  
Olusegun Famure ◽  
Jamie Greenfield ◽  
Yanhong Li ◽  
Syed Ibrahim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Graft Failure ◽  
Graft Loss ◽  
Major Adverse Cardiac Events ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Kidney Transplant Recipients ◽  
Cardiac Events ◽  
Urine Protein ◽  
Hazard Ratios ◽  
Adverse Cardiac Events

Introduction: Proteinuria is recognized as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease in kidney transplant recipients, but previous studies have not considered the impact of changes in urine protein over time. Research Question and Design: We used time-dependent, multivariable Cox proportional hazards models in this observational cohort study of adult kidney transplant recipients to evaluate whether proteinuria measured by dipstick on random spot urine samples starting from 1-month post-transplant was associated with the risk of major adverse cardiac events and graft loss. Results: A total of 144 major adverse cardiac events, defined as acute myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, revascularization, or all-cause mortality, were observed in 1106 patients over 5728.7 person-years. Any level of proteinuria greater or equal to trace resulted in a two-fold increase in the risk of major adverse cardiac events (hazard ratio 2.00 [95% confidence interval 1.41, 2.84]). This relationship was not found to be dose-dependent (hazard ratios of 2.98, 1.76, 1.63, and 1.54 for trace, 1+, 2+, and 3+ urine protein, respectively). There was an increased risk of graft failure with greater urine protein concentration (hazard ratios 2.22, 2.85, 6.41, and 19.71 for trace, 1+, 2+, and 3+, respectively). Conclusion: Urine protein is associated with major adverse cardiac events and graft loss in kidney transplant recipients. The role of interventions to reduce proteinuria on decreasing the risk of adverse cardiovascular and graft outcomes in kidney transplant recipients requires further study.

scholarly journals Validating International Classification of Disease 10th revision algorithms for identifying influenza and respiratory syncytial virus hospitalizations

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mackenzie A Hamilton ◽  
Andrew Calzavara ◽  
Scott D Emerson ◽  
Jeffrey C Kwong
Keyword(s):  
Respiratory Syncytial Virus ◽  
Administrative Data ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
International Classification ◽  
Health Administrative Data ◽  
International Classification Of Disease ◽  
Icd 10 ◽  
Syncytial Virus

Objective: Routinely collected health administrative data can be used to efficiently assess disease burden in large populations, but it is important to evaluate the validity of these data. The objective of this study was to develop and validate International Classification of Disease 10PthP revision (ICD -10) algorithms that identify laboratory-confirmed influenza or laboratory-confirmed respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) hospitalizations using population-based health administrative data from Ontario, Canada. Study Design and Setting: Influenza and RSV laboratory data from the 2014-15 through to 2017-18 respiratory virus seasons were obtained from the Ontario Laboratories Information System (OLIS) and were linked to hospital discharge abstract data to generate influenza and RSV reference cohorts. These reference cohorts were used to assess the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of the ICD-10 algorithms. To minimize misclassification in future studies, we prioritized specificity and PPV in selecting top-performing algorithms. Results: 83,638 and 61,117 hospitalized patients were included in the influenza and RSV reference cohorts, respectively. The best influenza algorithm had a sensitivity of 73% (95% CI 72% to 74%), specificity of 99% (95% CI 99% to 99%), PPV of 94% (95% CI 94% to 95%), and NPV of 94% (95% CI 94% to 95%). The best RSV algorithm had a sensitivity of 69% (95% CI 68% to 70%), specificity of 99% (95% CI 99% to 99%), PPV of 91% (95% CI 90% to 91%) and NPV of 97% (95% CI 97% to 97%). Conclusion: We identified two highly specific algorithms that best ascertain patients hospitalized with influenza or RSV. These algorithms may be applied to hospitalized patients if data on laboratory tests are not available, and will thereby improve the power of future epidemiologic studies of influenza, RSV, and potentially other severe acute respiratory infections.

scholarly journals High Mortality and Graft Loss After Infective Endocarditis in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Case-Controlled Study From Two Centers

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanis Tamzali ◽  
Clément Danthu ◽  
Alexandra Aubry ◽  
Jean-François Faucher ◽  
Zhour El Ouafi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Infective Endocarditis ◽  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Graft Loss ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Kidney Transplant Recipients ◽  
Retrospective Case ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Streptococcus Gallolyticus ◽  
Duke Criteria

Purpose: Kidney Transplant Recipients (KTRs) tend to develop infections with characteristic epidemiology, presentation and outcome. While infective endocarditis (IE) is among such complications in KTRs, literature is scarce. We describe the presentation, epidemiology, and factors associated with IE in KTRs. Methods: We performed a retrospective case/control study which included patients from two centers. First episodes of definite or possible IE (Duke criteria), in adult KTRs from January 2007 to December 2018 were included, as well as two controls per case, and followed until December 31 2019. Clinical, biological, and microbiological data and the outcome were collected. Survival was studied using the Kaplan-Meier method. Finally, we searched for factors associated with the onset of IE in KTRs by the comparison of cases and controls. Results: Seventeen cases and 34 controls were included. IE was diagnosed after a mean delay of 78 months after KT, mostly on native valves of the left heart only. Pathogens of digestive origin were most frequently involved (six Enterococcus spp, three Streptococcus gallolyticus and one Escherichia coli), followed by Staphylococci (three cases of S. aureus and S. epidermidis each). Among the risk factors evaluated only age was significantly associated with the occurrence of IE in our study (63.8 years for cases vs. 55.6 years for controls, P=0.03) Patient and death-censored graft survival were greatly diminished five years after IE compared to controls being 50.3% vs. 80.6% (p<0.003) and 29.7% vs. 87.5% (p<0.002), respectively. Conclusion: IE in KTRs is a disease that carries significant risks both for the survival of the patient and the transplant.

Venous Thromboembolism and the Risk of Death and Graft Loss in Kidney Transplant Recipients

2017 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 343-354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ngan N. Lam ◽  
Amit X. Garg ◽  
Greg A. Knoll ◽  
S. Joseph Kim ◽  
Krista L. Lentine ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
General Population ◽  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Graft Loss ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Kidney Transplant Recipients ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Increased Risk

Background: The implications of venous thromboembolism (VTE) for morbidity and mortality in kidney transplant recipients are not well described. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study using linked healthcare databases in Ontario, Canada to determine the risk and complications of VTE in kidney transplant recipients from 2003 to 2013. We compared the incidence rate of VTE in recipients (n = 4,343) and a matched (1:4) sample of the general population (n = 17,372). For recipients with evidence of a VTE posttransplant, we compared adverse clinical outcomes (death, graft loss) to matched (1:2) recipients without evidence of a VTE posttransplant. Results: During a median follow-up of 5.2 years, 388 (8.9%) recipients developed a VTE compared to 254 (1.5%) in the matched general population (16.3 vs. 2.4 events per 1,000 person-years; hazard ratio [HR] 7.1, 95% CI 6.0-8.4; p < 0.0001). Recipients who experienced a posttransplant VTE had a higher risk of death (28.5 vs. 11.2%; HR 4.1, 95% CI 2.9-5.8; p < 0.0001) and death-censored graft loss (13.1 vs. 7.5%; HR 2.3, 95% CI 1.4-3.6; p = 0.0006) compared to matched recipients who did not experience a posttransplant VTE. Conclusions: Kidney transplant recipients have a sevenfold higher risk of VTE compared to the general population with VTE conferring an increased risk of death and graft loss.

scholarly journals Screening Performance of Edmonton Symptom Assessment System in Kidney Transplant Recipients

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 995 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuri Battaglia ◽  
Luigi Zerbinati ◽  
Giulia Piazza ◽  
Elena Martino ◽  
Michele Provenzano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Psychological Symptoms ◽  
Symptom Assessment ◽  
Assessment System ◽  
Psychiatric Diagnoses ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Kidney Transplant Recipients ◽  
Edmonton Symptom Assessment System ◽  
Screening Performance ◽  
Icd 10

An average prevalence of 35% for psychiatric comorbidity has been reported in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) and an even higher prevalence of other psychosocial syndromes, as defined by the Diagnostic Criteria for Psychosomatic Research (DCPR), has also been found in this population. Consequently, an easy, simple, rapid psychiatric tool is needed to measure physical and psychological symptoms of distress in KTRs. Recently, the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS), a pragmatic patient-centred symptom assessment tool, was validated in a single cohort of KTRs. The aims of this study were: to test the screening performances of ESAS for the International Classification of Diseases-10th Revision (ICD-10) psychiatric diagnoses in KTRs; to investigate the optimal cut-off points for ESAS physical, psychological and global subscales in detecting ICD-10 psychiatric diagnoses; and to compare ESAS scores among KTR with ICD-10 diagnosis and DCPR diagnosis. 134 KTRs were evaluated and administered the MINI International Neuropsychiatric Interview 6.0 and the DCPR Interview. The ESAS and Canadian Problem Checklist (CPC) were given as self-report instruments to be filled in and were used to examine the severity of physical and psychological symptoms and daily-life problems. The physical distress sub-score (ESAS-PHYS), psychological distress sub-score (ESAS-PSY) and global distress score (ESAS-TOT) were obtained by summing up scores of six physical symptoms, four psychological symptoms and all single ESAS symptoms, respectively. Routine biochemistry, immunosuppressive agents, socio-demographic and clinical data were collected. Receiving Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to examine the ability of the ESAS emotional distress (DT) item, ESAS-TOT, ESAS-PSY and ESAS-PHYS, to detect psychiatric cases defined by using MINI6.0. The area under the ROC curve for ESAS-TOT, ESAS-PHYS, ESAS-PSY and DT item were 0.85, 0.73, 0.89, and 0.77, respectively. The DT item, ESAS-TOT and ESAS-PSY optimal cut-off points were ≥4 (sensitivity 0.74, specificity 0.73), ≥20 (sensitivity 0.85, specificity 0.74) and ≥12 (sensitivity 0.85, specificity 0.80), respectively. No valid ESAS-PHYS cut-off was found (sensitivity <0.7, specificity <0.7). Thirty-nine (84.8%) KTRs with ICD-10 diagnosis did exceed both ESAS-TOT and ESAS-PSY cut-offs. Higher scores on the ESAS symptoms (except shortness of breath and lack of appetite) and on the CPC problems were found for ICD-10 cases and DCRP cases than for ICD-10 no-cases and DCPR no-cases. This study shows that ESAS had an optimal screening performance (84.8%) to identify ICD-10 psychiatric diagnosis, evaluated with MINI; furthermore, ESAS-TOT and ESAS-PSY cut-off points could provide a guide for clinical symptom management in KTRs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document