scholarly journals Can Acupuncture Improve Chronic Spinal Pain? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
pp. 219256822096244
Author(s):  
Jin-Feng Huang ◽  
Xuan-Qi Zheng ◽  
Dong Chen ◽  
Jia-Liang Lin ◽  
Wen-Xian Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Spinal Pain ◽  
Sham Acupuncture ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Trial Registry ◽  
Clinical Trial Registry ◽  
Chronic Spinal Pain

Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Objective: To investigate the effect and safety of acupuncture for the treatment of chronic spinal pain. Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Web of Science, the WHO Clinical Trial Registry, and the US National Library of Medicine clinical trial registry were searched from January 1, 2000, to November 1, 2019. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving patients with chronic spinal pain treated by acupuncture versus sham acupuncture, no treatment, or another treatment were included. Results: Data was extracted from 22 RCTs including 2588 patients. Pooled analysis revealed that acupuncture can reduce chronic spinal pain compared to sham acupuncture (weighted mean difference [WMD] −12.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] −15.86 to −8.24), mediation control (WMD −18.27, 95% CI −28.18 to −8.37), usual care control (WMD −9.57, 95% CI −13.48 to −9.44), and no treatment control (WMD −17.10, 95% CI −24.83 to −9.37). In terms of functional disability, acupuncture can improve physical function at immediate-term follow-up (standardized mean difference [SMD] −1.74, 95% CI −2.04 to −1.44), short-term follow-up (SMD −0.89, 95% CI −1.15 to −0.62), and long-term follow-up (SMD −1.25, 95% CI −1.48 to −1.03). Conclusion: In summary, compared to no treatment, sham acupuncture, or conventional therapy such as medication, massage, and physical exercise, acupuncture has a significantly superior effect on the reduction in chronic spinal pain and function improvement. Acupuncture might be an effective treatment for patients with chronic spinal pain and it is a safe therapy.

scholarly journals Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) for cancer-related fatigue: study protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. e049318
Author(s):  
Yiwei Zeng ◽  
Jialin Xia ◽  
Zhihan Chen ◽  
Xiaoping Tian ◽  
Yulan Ren
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Biomedical Literature ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Trial Registry ◽  
Clinical Trial Registry ◽  
Cancer Related Fatigue ◽  
Acupoint Stimulation

IntroductionCancer-related fatigue (CRF) is a prevalent symptom in cancer survivors. Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) has been reported as a promising therapy for CRF. This protocol is proposed for a systematic review that aims to assess the efficacy and safety of TEAS for CRF.Methods and analysisCochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, Medline, Embase, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, VIP, Wanfang database, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, Chinese Clinical Trial Registry System, ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO International Clinical Trial Registry Platform will be searched from inception to 31 January 2021 without language limitations. The eligible randomised controlled trials will be included. The primary outcomes include changes in the revised Piper fatigue scale, the Brief fatigue inventory, the Multidimensional fatigue inventory and the Functional assessment of chronic illness therapy fatigue. The secondary outcomes are the quality-of-life measurement index, the Hamilton anxiety scale, the Hamilton depression scale and adverse events. The selection of studies, data extraction and assessment of risk of bias will be conducted independently by two reviewers. Data synthesis will be performed using RevMan V.5.4.1. The quality of evidence will be evaluated with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. This study will strictly adhere to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval is not required as this is a systematic review and meta-analysis based on previously published studies involving no private information of patients. The results of this study will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed journal.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42020220282.

Guidance for reporting clinical trial registry records and published protocols use in systematic reviews of interventions

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia Bidonde ◽  
Jose Francisco Meneses-Echavez ◽  
Angela Jean Busch ◽  
Catherine Boden
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Cochrane Collaboration ◽  
Subject Area ◽  
Selective Reporting ◽  
Trial Registry ◽  
Clinical Trial Registry ◽  
Reporting Practices ◽  
Starting Point

Abstract Background: Transparency is a tenet of systematic reviews. Searching for clinical trial registry records and published protocols has become a mandatory standard when conducting a systematic review of interventions. However, there is no comprehensive guidance for review authors on how to report the use of registry records and published protocols in their systematic review. The objective of this study was to generate initial guidance to assist authors of systematic reviews of interventions in the reporting of registry records and published protocols in systematic reviews of interventions. Methods: We used a compilation of the procedures recommended by expert organizations (e.g., Cochrane Collaboration) related to the reporting of use of registry records and published protocols in the conduct of systematic reviews. The compilation was developed by one of the authors in this study and served as a starting point in developing the algorithm. We extracted current practice data related to registry records and published protocols from a stratified random sample of Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions published between 2015 and 2016 (n=169). We identified examples that adhered to or extended the current guidance. Based on the on the elements above, we created the algorithm to bridge gaps and improve current reporting practices. Results: Trial protocols should be used to account for all evidence in a subject area, evaluate reporting bias (i.e. selective reporting and publication bias), and determine the nature and number of ongoing or unpublished studies for planning review updates. Review authors’ terminology (e.g., ongoing, terminated) and consequent reporting in the review should reflect the phase of the trial found. Protocols should be clearly and consistently reported throughout the review (e.g. abstract, methods, results) as is done with published articles. Conclusions: Our study expands on available guidance to describe in greater detail the reporting of registry records and published protocols for review authors. We believe this is a timely investigation that will increase transparency in the reporting of trial records in systematic reviews of interventions and bring clarification to current fuzziness in terminology. We invite researchers to provide feedback on our work for its improvement and dissemination. Trial Registration: not applicable

scholarly journals The comparison between total hip arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty in patients with femoral neck fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on 25 randomized controlled trials

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiumei Tang ◽  
Duan Wang ◽  
Ying Liu ◽  
Jiali Chen ◽  
Zongke Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Femoral Neck Fractures ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Acetabular Erosion

Abstract Background We performed an updated systematic review and meta-analysis which enrolled 25 prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare the outcomes between total hip arthroplasty (THA) and hemiarthroplasty (HA) in patients with femoral neck fractures (FNFs). Methods We searched English databases which included PubMed, Embase (vis OvidSP), The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, and Chinese databases Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), VIP, Wang Fang, and China Biology Medicine Disc (CBM) in July 2020. The quality of each study was assessed according to the Cochrane Collaboration’s Risk of Bias. Risk ratios (RRs) and weighted mean differences (WMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were pooled with random-effects models. Data regarding baseline characteristics, hospital and surgery outcomes, clinical outcomes, patients’ quality of life, common complications, prothesis-related complications, mortality, and costs were reported. Results A total of 25 RCTs involving 3223 patients (1568 THA and 1655 HA) were included. THA had longer hospital length (WMD = 0.721, P < 0.0001) and surgery time (WMD = 20.044, P < 0.0001), and more blood loss compared with HA (WMD = 69.109, P < 0.0001). THA showed better ratings in the Harris Hip Score during follow-up periods between 1 and 5 years while no differences within 6 months and after 9 years. THA was associated with higher quality-of-life EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) scores after 2 years of surgery but no difference within 1 year. There was no difference in common complications. THA had significant higher rate of dislocation (WMD = 1.897, P = 0.002) and lower acetabular erosion (WMD = 0.030, P = 0.001). For mortality, there was no difference during all the follow-up periods except for slightly higher 2-year mortality after surgery. Conclusion This meta-analysis demonstrates that THA has better medium-term functional results and quality of life and lower acetabular erosion rate, while HA shows better in reducing hospital stay, surgery time, and blood loss and also has lower dislocation rate.

scholarly journals Effect of Taping on Spinal Pain and Disability: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

2015 ◽  
Vol 95 (4) ◽  
pp. 493-506 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carla Vanti ◽  
Lucia Bertozzi ◽  
Ivan Gardenghi ◽  
Francesca Turoni ◽  
Andrew A. Guccione ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Myofascial Pain ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Pain Syndrome ◽  
Myofascial Pain Syndrome ◽  
Spinal Pain ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Cochrane Central Register

Background Taping is a widely used therapeutic tool for the treatment of musculoskeletal disorders, nevertheless its effectiveness is still uncertain. Purpose The purpose of this study was to conduct a current review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) concerning the effects of elastic and nonelastic taping on spinal pain and disability. Data Sources MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, PEDro, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Scopus, ISI Web of Knowledge, and SPORTDiscus databases were searched. Study Selection All published RCTs on symptomatic adults with a diagnosis of specific or nonspecific spinal pain, myofascial pain syndrome, or whiplash-associated disorders (WAD) were considered. Data Extraction Two reviewers independently selected the studies and extracted the results. The quality of individual studies was assessed using the PEDro scale, and the evidence was assessed using GRADE criteria. Data Synthesis Eight RCTs were included. Meta-analysis of 4 RCTs on low back pain demonstrated that elastic taping does not significantly reduce pain or disability immediately posttreatment, with a standardized mean difference of −0.31 (95% confidence interval=−0.64, 0.02) and −0.23 (95% confidence interval=−0.49, 0.03), respectively. Results from single trials indicated that both elastic and nonelastic taping are not better than placebo or no treatment on spinal disability. Positive results were found only for elastic taping and only for short-term pain reduction in WAD or specific neck pain. Generally, the effect sizes were very small or not clinically relevant, and all results were supported by low-quality evidence. Limitations The paucity of studies does not permit us to draw any final conclusions. Conclusion Although different types of taping were investigated, the results of this systematic review did not show any firm support for their effectiveness.

scholarly journals Efficacy of Auricular Acupressure for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li-Hua Yang ◽  
Pei-Bei Duan ◽  
Qing-Mei Hou ◽  
Shi-Zheng Du ◽  
Jin-Fang Sun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Chronic Low Back Pain ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Auricular Acupressure

Objectives. To identify the efficacy of auricular acupressure on pain and disability for chronic LBP by systematic review.Methods. A search of randomized controlled trials was conducted in four English medical electronic databases and three Chinese databases. Two reviewers independently retrieved related studies, assessed the methodological quality, and extracted data with a standardized data form. Meta-analyses were performed using all time-points meta-analysis.Results. A total of 7 trials met the inclusion criteria, of which 4 had the low risk of bias. The findings of this study showed that, for the immediate effect, auricular acupressure had large, significant effects in improving pain within 12 weeks. As for the follow-up effect, the pooled estimates also showed promising effect at 4-week follow-up after 4-week intervention (standardized mean difference = −1.13, 95% CI (-1.70,-0.56),P<0.001). But, for the disability level, the therapeutic effect was not significant (mean difference = −1.99, 95% CI (-4.93, 0.95),P=0.18). No serious adverse effects were recorded.Conclusions. The encouraging evidence of this study indicates that it is recommended to provide auricular acupressure to patients with chronic low back pain. However, a more accurate estimate of the effect will require further rigorously designed large-scale RCTs on chronic LBP for improving pain and disability.

scholarly journals Stuck-moving Needle acupuncture the Myofascial Triggers Point to treat Idiopathic Frozen Shoulders: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
YANG BAI ◽  
Ying Wang ◽  
Bo Chen ◽  
Qianqian Lei ◽  
Hailong Zhao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Frozen Shoulder ◽  
Baseline Period ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Trial Registry ◽  
Clinical Trial Registry ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Needle Acupuncture

Abstract Background There are evidences for the efficacy of acupuncture treatment for chronic shoulder pain, however it remains unclear the best acupuncture modes for effective treatment. We compared the effect of myofascial trigger point (MTrp) Stuck-moving Needle acupuncture with that of common acupuncture treatments. Further, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of stuck-moving needle acupuncture for the MTrp in improving pain and range of motions in patients with idiopathic frozen shoulder. The ultimate aim of the study is to select an effective therapy for patients with idiopathic frozen shoulder. Methods Randomized controlled trial will be conducted in the 3 clinical centers of Qingyang Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Qingyang Xifeng district People's Hospital and Qingyang Second People's Hospital in China from February 2020 to January 2021. One-hundred and eight frozen shoulder patient will be recruited and randomized into one of three groups in a 1:1:1 ratio of the Stuck-moving Needle acupuncture group, Common acupuncture control group and physical exercise control group. This trial will include a 1-week baseline period, a 3-weeks of treatment period, and a 12-weeks of follow-up period. During the 3-weeks of treatment period, patients will receive 9 sessions of acupuncture. The primary outcome will be related to change in the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Measurement of range of joint motion (ROM) from baseline period to the 12-week follow-up period. Secondary outcome measures will include, measurement of Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT), Pressure Pain Tolerance (PTT) Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), 36-item Short Form survey and Patient satisfaction evaluation. Adverse events also will be recorded for safety assessment. Discussion The results of this trial will allow us to compare the difference in efficacy between Stuck-moving Needle acupuncture MTrP with that of common acupuncture treatments. The findings from this trial will be published in the peer-reviewed journals. Trial registration: Acupuncture-Moxibustion Clinical Trial Registry (ChiMCTR1900002862) and Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR1900028452). registered on 22, Dec. 2019

scholarly journals Comparative efficacy and safety of statin and fibrate monotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of head-to-head randomized controlled trials

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. e0246480
Author(s):  
Joseph E. Blais ◽  
Gloria Kin Yi Tong ◽  
Swathi Pathadka ◽  
Michael Mok ◽  
Ian C. K. Wong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Serum Creatinine ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Randomized Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Elevated Serum ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Major Cardiovascular Events

Objective To assess whether in adults with dyslipidemia, statins reduce cardiovascular events, mortality, and adverse effects when compared to fibrates. Methods Systematic review and meta-analysis of head-to-head randomized trials of statin and fibrate monotherapy. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, WHO International Controlled Trials Registry Platform, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched through October 30, 2019. Trials that had a follow-up of at least 28 days, and reported mortality or a cardiovascular outcome of interest were eligible for inclusion. Efficacy outcomes were cardiovascular mortality and major cardiovascular events. Safety outcomes included myalgia, serious adverse effects, elevated serum creatinine, and elevated serum alanine aminotransferase. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using the Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effect model, and heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. Results We included 19 eligible trials that directly compared statin and fibrate monotherapy and reported mortality or a cardiovascular event. Studies had a limited duration of follow-up (range 10 weeks to 2 years). We did not find any evidence of a difference between statins and fibrates for cardiovascular mortality (OR 2.35, 95% CI 0.94–5.86, I2 = 0%; ten studies, n = 2657; low certainty), major cardiovascular events (OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.80–1.65, I2 = 13%; 19 studies, n = 7619; low certainty), and myalgia (OR 1.32, 95% CI 0.95–1.83, I2 = 0%; ten studies, n = 6090; low certainty). Statins had less serious adverse effects (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.36–0.91, I2 = 0%; nine studies, n = 3749; moderate certainty), less elevations in serum creatinine (OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.08–0.36, I2 = 0%; six studies, n = 2553; high certainty), and more elevations in alanine aminotransferase (OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.03–1.99, I2 = 44%; seven studies, n = 5225; low certainty). Conclusions The eligible randomized trials of statins versus fibrates were designed to assess short-term lipid outcomes, making it difficult to have certainty about the direct comparative effect on cardiovascular outcomes and mortality. With the exception of myalgia, use of a statin appeared to have a lower incidence of adverse effects compared to use of a fibrate.

scholarly journals Behavioral interventions for sleep disturbances in children with neurological and neurodevelopmental disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

SLEEP ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalie L Phillips ◽  
Teleri Moore ◽  
Arthur Teng ◽  
Naomi Brookes ◽  
Tonya M Palermo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Neurodevelopmental Disorders ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Sleep Disturbances ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Sleep Onset ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Abstract Study Objectives Sleep disturbances are common and associated with negative functional and health consequences in children with neurological and neurodevelopmental disorders (NNDDs) and represent an important potential target for behavioral interventions. This systematic review examined the efficacy of behavioral sleep interventions (BSIs) for children with NNDDs and comorbid sleep disturbances. Methods A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO, and CENTRAL was conducted in April 2019. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of BSI for children with NNDDS were included. Meta-analysis and GRADE quality ratings were performed on sleep and secondary functional outcomes (cognition, academics, and behavior). Results Nine RCTs were identified (n = 690; Mage = 8.39 ± 2.64years; 71.11% male). The quality of the evidence was predominantly rated as moderate. Posttreatment improvements in sleep were found on self-reported sleep disturbances (total sleep disturbance [standardized mean difference, i.e. SMD = 0.89], night wakings [SMD = 0.52], bedtime resistance [SMD = 0.53], parasomnias [SMD = 0.34], sleep anxiety [SMD = 0.50]) and self-reported sleep patterns (sleep duration [SMD = 0.30], sleep onset duration [SMD = 0.75]) and (2) objectively measured actigraphic sleep patterns (total sleep time [MD = 18.09 min; SMD = 0.32], sleep onset latency [MD = 11.96 min; SMD = 0.41]). Improvements in sleep (self-reported, not actigraphy) were maintained at follow-up, but few studies conducted follow-up assessments resulting in low-quality evidence. Reduction in total behavioral problems (SMD = 0.48) posttreatment and attention/hyperactivity (SMD = 0.28) at follow-up was found. Changes in cognition and academic skills were not examined in any studies. Conclusions BSIs improve sleep, at least in the short term, in children with NNDDs. Benefits may extend to functional improvements in behavior. More rigorous RCTs involving placebo controls, blinded outcome assessment, longer follow-up durations, and assessment of functional outcomes are required.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document