Paraspinal Muscle Degeneration as an Independent Risk for Loss of Local Alignment in Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis Patients After Corrective Surgery

2021 ◽  
pp. 219256822110222
Author(s):  
Gengyu Han ◽  
Wei Wang ◽  
Siyu Zhou ◽  
Wei Li ◽  
Bo Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Paraspinal Muscle ◽  
Local Alignment ◽  
Global Alignment ◽  
Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis ◽  
Muscle Degeneration ◽  
Corrective Surgery ◽  
Paraspinal Muscles ◽  
Lumbar Scoliosis ◽  
Maintenance Group

Study Design: Retrospective study. Objectives: To investigate the effect of paraspinal muscle degeneration on the maintenance of local and global alignment among degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS) patients after corrective surgery. Methods: 98 DLS patients with a mean follow-up period of 38.3 months after corrective surgery were included. The T1 pelvic angle (TPA), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence were measured preoperatively, immediate postoperatively and at last follow-up. All patients were divided into LL maintenance group (n = 21) and LL loss group (n = 77). For patients with well-aligned correction (immediate postoperative TPA ≤ 20°, n = 73), they were divided into TPA maintenance group (last follow-up TPA ≤ 20°) and TPA loss group (last follow-up TPA > 20°). The relative gross cross-sectional area (rGCSA) and fat infiltration (FI) of multifidus (MF) and erector spinae (ES), and the relative functional CSA (rFCSA) of psoas major (PS) were measured at L3, L4 and L5 on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Results: MF rGCSA were significantly smaller in LL loss group than in LL maintenance group. Both MF rGCSA and PS rFCSA were significantly smaller and MF FI was significantly higher in TPA loss group than in TPA maintenance group. Binary logistic regression revealed that the MF rGCSA was an independent factor of LL loss; Large immediate postoperative TPA was an independent risk factor of TPA loss, but not the parameters of paraspinal muscles. Conclusion: The effect of paraspinal muscles in lower lumbar segments might be mainly focused on the maintenance of local alignment rather than the global alignment.

The influence of approach side on facet preservation in microscopic bilateral decompression via a unilateral approach for degenerative lumbar scoliosis

2010 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 758-765 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akira Matsumura ◽  
Takashi Namikawa ◽  
Hidetomi Terai ◽  
Tadao Tsujio ◽  
Akinobu Suzuki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Recovery Rate ◽  
Japanese Orthopaedic Association ◽  
Spinal Instability ◽  
Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis ◽  
Lumbar Scoliosis ◽  
Unilateral Approach ◽  
Scale Scores ◽  
The Mean

Object The authors compared the clinical outcomes of microscopic bilateral decompression via a unilateral approach (MBDU) for the treatment of degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS) and for lumbar canal stenosis (LCS) without instability. The authors also compared postoperative spinal instability in terms of different approach sides (concave or convex) following the procedure. Methods The authors retrospectively reviewed data obtained in 50 consecutive patients (25 in the DLS group and 25 in the LCS group) who underwent MBDU; the minimum follow-up period was 2 years. Patients with DLS were divided into 2 subgroups according to the surgical approach side: a concave group (23 segment) and a convex group (17 segments). The Japanese Orthopaedic Association Scale scores for the assessment of low-back pain were evaluated before surgery and at final follow-up. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association Scale scores and recovery rates were compared between the DLS and LCS groups, and between the convex and concave groups. Cobb angle and scoliotic wedging angle (SWA) were evaluated on standing radiographs before surgery and at final follow-up. Facet joint preservation (the percentage of preservation) was assessed on pre- and postoperative CT scans, compared between the LCS and DLS groups, and compared between the concave and convex groups. The influence of approach side on postoperative progression of segmental instability was also examined in the DLS group. Results The mean recovery rate was 58.7% in the DLS and 62.0% in the LCS group. The mean recovery rate was 58.6% in the convex group and 60.6% in the concave group. There were no significant differences in recovery rates between the LCS and DLS groups, or between the DLS subgroups. The mean Cobb angles in the DLS group were significantly increased from 12.7° preoperatively to 14.1° postoperatively (p < 0.05), and mean preoperative SWAs increased significantly from 6.2° at L3–4 and 4.1° at L4–5 preoperatively to 7.4° and 4.9°, respectively, at final follow-up (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in percentage of preservation between the DLS and LCS groups. The mean percentages of preservation on the approach side in the DLS group at L3–4 and L4–5 were 89.0% and 83.1% in the convex group, and those in the concave group were 67.3% and 77.6%, respectively. The percentage of preservation at L3–4 was significantly higher in the convex than the concave group. The mean SWA had increased in the concave group (p = 0.01) but not the convex group (p = 0.15) at final follow-up. Conclusions The MBDU can reduce postoperative segmental spinal instability and achieve good postoperative clinical outcomes in patients with DLS. The convex approach provides surgeons with good visibility and improves preservation of facet joints.

scholarly journals The surgical outcome of decompression alone versus decompression with limited fusion for degenerative lumbar scoliosis

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 259-264 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenji Masuda ◽  
Takayuki Higashi ◽  
Katsutaka Yamada ◽  
Tatsuhiro Sekiya ◽  
Tomoyuki Saito
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Cobb Angle ◽  
Japanese Orthopaedic Association ◽  
Spinal Instability ◽  
Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis ◽  
Surgical Decision ◽  
Lumbar Scoliosis ◽  
Radiological Parameters ◽  
Surgical Decision Making

OBJECTIVEThe aim of this study was to assess the usefulness of radiological parameters for surgical decision-making in patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS) by comparing the clinical and radiological results after decompression or decompression and fusion surgery.METHODSThe authors prospectively planned surgical treatment for 298 patients with degenerative lumbar disease between September 2005 and March 2013. The surgical method used at their institution to address intervertebral instability is precisely defined based on radiological parameters. Among 64 patients with a Cobb angle ranging from 10° to 25°, 57 patients who underwent follow-up for more than 2 years postoperatively were evaluated. These patients were divided into 2 groups: those in the decompression group underwent decompression alone (n = 25), and those in the fusion group underwent decompression and short segmental fusion (n = 32). Surgical outcomes were reviewed, including preoperative and postoperative Cobb angles, lumbar lordosis based on radiological parameters, and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores.RESULTSThe JOA scores of the decompression group and fusion group improved from 5.9 ± 1.6 to 10.0 ± 2.8 and from 7.2 ± 2.0 to 11.3 ± 2.8, respectively, which was not significantly different between the groups. At the final follow-up, the postoperative Cobb angle in the decompression group changed from 14° ± 2.9° to 14.3° ± 6.4° and remained stable, while the Cobb angle in the fusion group decreased from 14.8° ± 4.0° to 10.0° ± 8.5° after surgery.CONCLUSIONSThe patients in both groups demonstrated improved JOA scores and preserved Cobb angles after surgery. The improvement in JOA scores and preservation of Cobb angles in both groups show that the evaluation of spinal instability using radiological parameters is appropriate for surgical decision-making.

CHALLENGING DEGENERATIVE LUMBAR SCOLIOSIS WITH SEGMENTAL CORRECTIVE FUSION SURGERY

2006 ◽  
Vol 10 (03) ◽  
pp. 141-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takahiro Iizuka ◽  
S. Yamada
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Curvature ◽  
Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis ◽  
Spinal Alignment ◽  
Poor Bone Quality ◽  
Fusion Surgery ◽  
Lumbar Scoliosis ◽  
Cobb’S Angle ◽  
Correction Surgery ◽  
The Mean

Changes in the curvature have not been reported in degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS) when the correction surgery was performed. The purpose of our study was to clarify the influence of the correction surgery of DLS. Twenty-one patients underwent corrective lumbar reconstruction surgery (1998–2003) only at the neurologically affected levels. The spinal curvature was retrospectively evaluated in these 21 patients with DLS using Cobb's methods. The mean preoperative Cobb's angle was 17.7° while the mean postoperative Cobb's angle was 6.1° (p < 0.0001) at 1 month after the surgery and 9.0° at the final follow-up. The correction rate was 65.2% at 1 month after the surgery and 50.2% at the final follow-up. Cobb's angle increased by 2.9°/43.4 months (mean, 0.80°/year) in these procedure. The surgical goals of DLS are the relief of neurological disorders and the cessation of the deterioration of spinal alignment. Strategies for DLS may include complete decompression, or correction of the spinal alignment in elderly patients with poor bone quality. Decompression and correction in the PLIF procedure only at neurologically affected levels may be one of the surgical procedures to challenge DLS.

scholarly journals Comparison between dynamic stabilization and instrumented fusion in the treatment of spinal stenosis with degenerative lumbar scoliosis

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Luo ◽  
Lang Fang ◽  
Qiang Zhou ◽  
Chen Zhao ◽  
Pei Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Spinal Stenosis ◽  
Perioperative Complications ◽  
Dynamic Stabilization ◽  
Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis ◽  
Instrumented Fusion ◽  
Lumbar Scoliosis ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Posterior Instrumented Fusion

Abstract Background Posterior instrumented fusion is the most widely accepted surgical treatment for spinal stenosis with degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS). However, long fusion can affect daily activities due to lumbar stiffness. Several clinical studies have shown that Dynesys dynamic stabilization in addition to laminectomy could lead to significant improvements in clinical outcomes. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of Dynesys dynamic stabilization with posterior instrumented fusion for the management of spinal stenosis with DLS. Methods Between August 2010 and Deccember 2015, a total of 46 patients with spinal stenosis and degenerative lumbar scoliosis were enrolled in this study. 26 patients (Dynesys group) had fenestration decompression, selective intervertebral fusion and Dynesys stabilizationin. 20 patients (fusion group) underwent posterior instrumented fusion. Clinical outcomes, radiographic data, and perioperative complications were compared between the two groups. The average duration of follow-up for the Dynesys group and fusion group was 38 and 33 months respectively. Results The mean number of fixed segments were 3.3±0.8 in Dynesys group and 4.3±0.8 in fusion group. Lower average values of operative duration and blood loss were observed in the dynamic group than in the fusion group. VAS for back and leg pain improved in both groups of patients. There were significant difference in ODI and LSDI (lumbar stiffness disability index) between Dynesys group and fusion group at the last follow-up. The scoliosis Cobb's angle and lumbar lordosis significantly improved in both groups after surgery, and no significant difference were observed between the groups at the last follow-up (P＞0.05). Dynesys stabilization resulted in significantly higher preservation of motion at the implanted segments. Conclusions This study demonstrated that both Dynesys dynamic stabilization and instrumented fusion can improve clinical outcomes of patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Compared to instrumented fusion, Dynesys stabilizationin have advantages on blood loss, operation time, perioperative complications. In addition, Dynesys stabilization partially preserves the ROM of the stabilized segments that may reduce the limitation on daily activities caused by lumbar stiffness. Dynesys stabilizationin can also correct scoliosis, prevent progression of the curve, and maintain lumbar lordosis in mild to moderate lumbar scoliosis without sagittal imbalance.

scholarly journals Adult spinal deformity and its relationship with height loss: A 34-year longitudinal cohort study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mutsuya Shimizu ◽  
Tetsuya Kobayashi ◽  
Hisashi Chiba ◽  
Issei Senoo ◽  
Hiroshi Ito ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Deformity ◽  
Adult Spinal Deformity ◽  
Epidemiological Studies ◽  
Height Loss ◽  
Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis ◽  
Physical Change ◽  
Lumbar Scoliosis ◽  
Pelvic Parameters ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Background: Age-related height loss is a normal physical change that occurs in all individuals over 50 years of age. Although many epidemiological studies on height loss have been conducted worldwide, none have been long-term longitudinal epidemiological studies spanning over 30 years. This study was designed to investigate changes in adult spinal deformity and examine the relationship between adult spinal deformity and height loss.Methods: Fifty-three local healthy subjects (32 men, 21 women) from Furano, Hokkaido, Japan, volunteered for this longitudinal cohort study. Their heights were measured in 1983 and again in 2017. Spino-pelvic parameters were compared between measurements obtained in 1983 and 2017. Individuals with height loss were then divided into two groups, those with degenerative spondylosis and those with degenerative lumbar scoliosis, and different characteristics were compared between the two groups.Results: The mean age of the subjects was 44.4 (31-55) years at baseline and 78.6 (65-89) years at the final follow-up. The mean height was 157.4 cm at baseline and 153.6 cm at the final follow-up, with a mean height loss of 3.8 cm over 34.2 years. All parameters except for thoracic kyphosis were significantly different between measurements taken in 1983 and 2017 (p<0.05). Height loss in both sexes was related to changes in pelvic parameters including pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (R=0.460 p=0.008 in men, R=0.553 p=0.012 in women), pelvic tilt (R=0.374 p=0.035 in men, R=0.540 p=0.014 in women), and sagittal vertical axis (R=0.535 p=0.002 in men, R=0.527 p=0.017 in women). Greater height loss was more commonly seen in women (p=0.001) and in patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis (p=0.02).Conclusions: This longitudinal study revealed that height loss is more commonly observed in women and is associated with adult spinal deformity and degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Height loss is a normal physical change with aging, but excessive height loss is due to spinal kyphosis and scoliosis leading to spinal malalignment. Our findings suggest that height loss might be an early physical symptom for spinal malalignment.

scholarly journals Adult spinal deformity and its relationship with height loss: A 34-year longitudinal cohort study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mutsuya Shimizu ◽  
Tetsuya Kobayashi ◽  
Hisashi Chiba ◽  
Issei Senoo ◽  
Hiroshi Ito ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Deformity ◽  
Adult Spinal Deformity ◽  
Epidemiological Studies ◽  
Height Loss ◽  
Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis ◽  
Physical Change ◽  
Lumbar Scoliosis ◽  
Pelvic Parameters ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Background Age-related height loss is a normal physical change that occurs in all individuals over 50 years of age. Many epidemiological studies were conducted on height loss worldwide, however, over the 30 years longitudinal epidemiological studies have not been conducted. This study was designed to investigate changes in adult spinal deformity and examine the relationship between adult spinal deformity and height loss. Methods Fifty-three local healthy subjects (32 men, 21 women) from Furano, Hokkaido, Japan, volunteered for this longitudinal cohort study. Their heights were measured in 1983 and again in 2017. Spino-pelvic parameters were compared between 1983 and 2017. Individuals with height loss were then divided into two groups, those with degenerative spondylosis and those with degenerative lumbar scoliosis, and different characteristics were compared between the two groups. Results The mean age of the subjects was 44.4 (31-55) years at baseline and 78.6 (65-89) years at the final follow-up. The mean height was 157.4 cm at baseline and 153.6 cm at the final follow-up, with a mean height loss of 3.8 cm over 34.2 years. All parameters except for thoracic kyphosis were significantly different between 1983 and 2017 (p<0.05). Height loss was related to changes in pelvic parameters including pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (R=0.553 p<0.0001), pelvic tilt (R=0.462 p<0.0001), and sagittal vertical axis (R=0.514 p<0.0001). Greater height loss was more commonly seen in women (p=0.001) and in patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis (p=0.02). Conclusions This longitudinal study revealed that height loss is more commonly observed in women and is associated with adult spinal deformity and degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Height loss is a normal physical change with aging, but excessive height loss is due to spinal kyphosis and scoliosis leading to spinal malalignment. Our findings suggest that height loss might be an early physical symptom for spinal malalignment.

scholarly journals Posterior column osteotomy plus unilateral cage strutting for correction of lumbosacral fractional curve in degenerative lumbar scoliosis

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui Wang ◽  
Longjie Wang ◽  
Zhuoran Sun ◽  
Shuai Jiang ◽  
Weishi Li
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Lordosis ◽  
Vertical Axis ◽  
Posterior Column ◽  
Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis ◽  
Sagittal Vertical Axis ◽  
Lumbar Scoliosis ◽  
Coronal Balance ◽  
Bone Fusion ◽  
Cage Subsidence

Abstract Background Inadequate release of the posterior spinal bone elements may hinder the correction of the lumbosacral fractional curve in degenerative lumbar scoliosis, since the lumbosacral junction tends to be particularly rigid and may already be fused into an abnormal position. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the surgical outcome and complications of posterior column osteotomy plus unilateral cage strutting technique on lumbosacral concavity for correction of fractional curve in degenerative lumbar scoliosis patients. Methods Thirty-two degenerative lumbar scoliosis patients with lumbosacral fractional curve more than 15° that were surgically treated by posterior column osteotomy plus unilateral cage strutting technique were retrospectively reviewed. The patients’ medical records were reviewed to identify demographic and surgical data, including age, sex, body mass index, back pain, leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index, operation time, blood loss, and instrumentation levels. Radiological data including coronal balance distance, Cobb angle, lumbosacral coronal angle, sagittal vertical axis, lumbar lordosis, and lumbosacral lordotic angle were evaluated before and after surgery. Cage subsidence and bone fusion were evaluated at 2-year follow-up. Results All patients underwent the operation successfully; lumbosacral coronal angle changed from preoperative 20.1 ± 5.3° to postoperative 5.8 ± 5.7°, with mean correction of 14.3 ± 4.4°, and the correction was maintained at 2-year follow-up. Cobb’s angle and coronal balance distance decreased from preoperative to postoperative; the correction was maintained at 2-year follow-up. Sagittal vertical axis decreased, and lumbar lordosis increased from preoperative to postoperative; the correction was also maintained at 2-year follow-up. Lumbosacral lordotic angle presented no change from preoperative to postoperative and from postoperative to 2-year follow-up. Postoperatively, there were 8 patients with lumbosacral coronal angle more than 10°, they got the similar lumbosacral coronal angle correction, but presented larger preoperative Cobb and lumbosacral coronal angle than the other 24 patients. No cage subsidence was detected; all patients achieved intervertebral bone fusion and inter-transverse bone graft fusion at the lumbosacral region at 2-year follow-up. Conclusion Posterior column osteotomy plus unilateral cage strutting technique on the lumbosacral concavity facilitate effective correction of the fractional curve in degenerative lumbar scoliosis patients through complete release of dural sac as well as the asymmetrical intervertebral reconstruction by cage.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document