scholarly journals A Comprehensive Analysis of the Behavior of Pelvic Incidence After Different Posterior Spinal Procedures in Elderly Patients With Spinal Deformity

2021 ◽  
pp. 219256822199668
Author(s):  
Weiguo Zhu ◽  
Yu Wang ◽  
Chao Kong ◽  
Xiangyao Sun ◽  
Fumin Pan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Spinal Deformity ◽  
Pelvic Incidence ◽  
Lumbar Fusion ◽  
Adult Spinal Deformity ◽  
Sagittal Vertical Axis ◽  
Pelvic Fixation ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Sagittal Deformity

Study Design: A retrospective case-control study. Objective: To evaluate the behavior of pelvic incidence (PI) after different posterior spinal procedures in elderly patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD), to determine the potential associated factors with the variability in PI after spinal surgery and to comprehensively analyze its mechanisms. Methods: Elderly patients underwent long fusion to sacrum with and without pelvic fixation were assigned to Group L+P and Group L-P, respectively. In Group L-P, those with severe sagittal deformity were selected as Group A. 20 elderly patients with severe sagittal deformity underwent short lumbar fusion were included as Group B. The following radiographic parameters were evaluated: thoracic kyphosis (TK), thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK), lumbar lordosis (LL), PI-LL, sagittal vertical axis (SVA), T1 pelvic angle (TPA), and pelvic parameters. PI changing more than 5° (△PI > 5°) was considered as substantially changed. Results: For the whole cohort and in Group L+P, PI were not substantially changed (△PI ≤ 5°) after surgery. Besides the severer sagittal malalignment in patients with △PI > 5° in Group L-P, relatively larger mean age, greater proportion of female and lower preoperative PI were found than those in patients with △PI ≤ 5°. 70.8% of patients had substantial increase of PI in Group A, while only 10% of patients had in Group B ( P < 0.001). Conclusion: PI behaves differently under different conditions in elderly ASD patients. Besides severe sagittal deformity, aging, female and low preoperative PI are also the potential risk factors of PI increasing after long fusion to sacrum.

scholarly journals Supine Imaging Is a Superior Predictor of Long-Term Alignment Following Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery

2020 ◽  
pp. 219256822096075
Author(s):  
Jonathan Charles Elysee ◽  
Francis Lovecchio ◽  
Renaud Lafage ◽  
Bryan Ang ◽  
Alex Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Deformity ◽  
Lumbar Lordosis ◽  
Pelvic Incidence ◽  
Lumbar Fusion ◽  
Adult Spinal Deformity ◽  
Multilinear Regression ◽  
Sagittal Vertical Axis ◽  
Type Curve ◽  
Scoliosis Research Society ◽  
Correlation Analyses

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Objective: To investigate correlations between preoperative supine imaging and postoperative alignment. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of a single-institution database of patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD). Patients were stratified by fusion location in the lumbar or thoracic spine. Outcomes of interest were postoperative lumbar lordosis (LL) and thoracic kyphosis (TK). Sagittal alignment parameters were compared and correlation analyses were performed. Multilinear stepwise regression was conducted to identify independent predictors of postoperative LL or TK. Regression analyses were repeated within the lumbar and thoracic fusion cohorts. Results: A total of 99 patients were included (mean age 63.2 years, 83.1% female, mean body mass index 27.3 kg/m2). Scoliosis Research Society classification demonstrated moderate to severe sagittal and/or coronal deformity (pelvic tile modifier, 18.2% ++; sagittal vertical axis, 27.3% ++, pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis mismatch, 29.3% ++, SRS type, 29.3% N type curve and 68.7% L or D type curve). A total of 73 patients (73.7%) underwent lumbar fusion and 50 (50.5%) underwent thoracic fusion. Correlation analyses demonstrated a significant association between pre- and postoperative LL and TK. Multilinear regression demonstrated that LL supine and pelvic incidence were significant predictors of postoperative LL ( r 2 = 0.568, P < .001). LL supine, TK supine, and age were significant predictors of postoperative TK ( r 2 = 0.490, P < .001). Conclusion: Preoperative supine films are superior to standing in predicting postoperative alignment at 1-year follow-up. Anticipation of undesired alignment changes through supine imaging may be useful in mitigating the risk of iatrogenic malalignment.

scholarly journals Association between bicortical screw fixation at upper instrumented vertebra and risk for upper instrumented vertebra fracture

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 638-644 ◽  
Author(s):  
Young-Seop Park ◽  
Seung-Jae Hyun ◽  
Ho Yong Choi ◽  
Ki-Jeong Kim ◽  
Tae-Ahn Jahng
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Deformity ◽  
Pelvic Incidence ◽  
Screw Fixation ◽  
Adult Spinal Deformity ◽  
Vertical Axis ◽  
Sagittal Vertical Axis ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Upper Instrumented Vertebra ◽  
Bicortical Screw

OBJECTIVEThe aim of this study was to investigate the risk of upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) fractures associated with UIV screw fixation (unicortical vs bicortical) and polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) augmentation after adult spinal deformity surgery.METHODSA single-center, single-surgeon consecutive series of adult patients who underwent lumbar fusion for ≥ 4 levels (that is, the lower instrumented vertebra at the sacrum or pelvis and the UIV of the thoracolumbar spine [T9–L2]) were retrospectively reviewed. Age, sex, follow-up duration, sagittal UIV angle immediately postoperatively including several balance-related parameters (lumbar lordosis [LL], pelvic incidence, and sagittal vertical axis), bone mineral density, UIV screw fixation type, UIV PMMA augmentation, and UIV fracture were evaluated. Patients were divided into 3 groups: Group U, 15 patients with unicortical screw fixation at the UIV; Group P, 16 with bicortical screw fixation and PMMA augmentation at the UIV; and Group B, 21 with bicortical screw fixation without PMMA augmentation at the UIV.RESULTSThe mean number of levels fused was 6.5 ± 2.5, 7.5 ± 2.5, and 6.5 ± 2.5; the median age was 50 ± 29, 72 ± 6, and 59 ± 24 years; and the mean follow-up was 31.5 ± 23.5, 13 ± 6, and 24 ± 17.5 months in Groups U, P, and B, respectively (p > 0.05). There were no significant differences in balance-related parameters (LL, sagittal vertical axis, pelvic incidence–LL, and so on) among the groups. UIV fracture rates in Groups U (0%), P (31.3%), and B (42.9%) increased in sequence by group (p = 0.006). UIV bicortical screw fixation increased the risk for UIV fracture (OR 5.39; p = 0.02).CONCLUSIONSBicortical screw fixation at the UIV is a major risk factor for early UIV compression fracture, regardless of whether a thoracolumbosacral orthosis is used. To reduce the proximal junctional failure, unicortical screw fixation at the UIV is essential in adult spinal deformity correction surgery.

scholarly journals Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes From the Use of S2 Alar Screws in Surgery for Adult Spinal Deformity

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 668-675
Author(s):  
Toshiyuki Nakazawa ◽  
Gen Inoue ◽  
Takayuki Imura ◽  
Masayuki Miyagi ◽  
Wataru Saito ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Deformity ◽  
Thoracic Kyphosis ◽  
Pelvic Tilt ◽  
Pelvic Incidence ◽  
Adult Spinal Deformity ◽  
Vertical Axis ◽  
Mineral Density ◽  
Severe Osteoporosis ◽  
Sagittal Vertical Axis

Study Design: Retrospective. Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of S2 alar screws in surgery for correction of adult spinal deformity (ASD). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the cases of 23 patients (mean follow-up: 18.5 months, minimum 12 months) who underwent corrective surgery for ASD using S2 alar screws as anchors for instrumentation of lower vertebrae. The background of the patients and their spinopelvic parameters (pelvic incidence [PI], pelvic tilt [PT], lumbar lordosis [LL], thoracic kyphosis [TK], sagittal vertical axis [SVA], and PI-LL) were evaluated. Results: LL was improved from 9.7 ± 20.5° and SVA from 141.0 ± 64.0 mm before surgery to 39.0 ± 9.6° and 51.7 ± 40.8 mm immediately after surgery, respectively, and 38.2 ± 12.7° and 70.5 ± 59.2 mm at final follow-up. In 13 patients without sufficient correction (postoperative PI-LL ≥10°), bone mineral density and postoperative LL were significantly less, and PI, PI-LL, and PT were significantly greater than in patients with postoperative PI-LL <10°, suggesting that these are risk factors for undercorrection. In 5 patients, SVA increased more than 40 mm during follow-up. Postoperative LL was significantly less (31.4° vs 41.0°) and postoperative PI-LL was significantly greater (21.6° vs 9.3°) in these patients, suggesting a PI-LL mismatch induces postoperative progression of global malalignment. Conclusions: Use of S2 alar screws as anchors for instrumentation in ASD surgery should be restricted. Their use might be an option for patients with low PI, and without severe osteoporosis, in whom efficient surgical correction can be obtained.

Asymmetrical pedicle subtraction osteotomy for correction of concurrent sagittal-coronal imbalance in adult spinal deformity: a comparative analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 822-829
Author(s):  
Darryl Lau ◽  
Alexander F. Haddad ◽  
Vedat Deviren ◽  
Christopher P. Ames
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Deformity ◽  
Adult Spinal Deformity ◽  
Vertical Axis ◽  
Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy ◽  
Sagittal Imbalance ◽  
Sagittal Vertical Axis ◽  
Coronal Imbalance ◽  
Significant Correction ◽  
Sagittal Deformity

OBJECTIVERigid multiplanar thoracolumbar adult spinal deformity (ASD) cases are challenging and many require a 3-column osteotomy (3CO), specifically asymmetrical pedicle subtraction osteotomy (APSO). The outcomes and additional risks of performing APSO for the correction of concurrent sagittal-coronal deformity have yet to be adequately studied.METHODSThe authors performed a retrospective review of all ASD patients who underwent 3CO during the period from 2006 to 2019. All cases involved either isolated sagittal deformity (patients underwent standard PSO) or concurrent sagittal-coronal deformity (coronal vertical axis [CVA] ≥ 4.0 cm; patients underwent APSO). Perioperative and 2-year follow-up outcomes were compared between patients with isolated sagittal imbalance who underwent PSO and those with concurrent sagittal-coronal imbalance who underwent APSO.RESULTSA total of 390 patients were included: 338 who underwent PSO and 52 who underwent APSO. The mean patient age was 64.6 years, and 65.1% of patients were female. APSO patients required significantly more fusions with upper instrumented vertebrae (UIV) in the upper thoracic spine (63.5% vs 43.3%, p = 0.007). Radiographically, APSO patients had greater deformity with more severe preoperative sagittal and coronal imbalance: sagittal vertical axis (SVA) 13.0 versus 10.7 cm (p = 0.042) and CVA 6.1 versus 1.2 cm (p < 0.001). In APSO cases, significant correction and normalization were achieved (SVA 13.0–3.1 cm, CVA 6.1–2.0 cm, lumbar lordosis [LL] 26.3°–49.4°, pelvic tilt [PT] 38.0°–20.4°, and scoliosis 25.0°–10.4°, p < 0.001). The overall perioperative complication rate was 34.9%. There were no significant differences between PSO and APSO patients in rates of complications (overall 33.7% vs 42.3%, p = 0.227; neurological 5.9% vs 3.9%, p = 0.547; medical 20.7% vs 25.0%, p = 0.482; and surgical 6.5% vs 11.5%, p = 0.191, respectively). However, the APSO group required significantly longer stays in the ICU (3.1 vs 2.3 days, p = 0.047) and hospital (10.8 vs 8.3 days, p = 0.002). At the 2-year follow-up, there were no significant differences in mechanical complications, including proximal junctional kyphosis (p = 0.352), pseudarthrosis (p = 0.980), rod fracture (p = 0.852), and reoperation (p = 0.600).CONCLUSIONSASD patients with significant coronal imbalance often have severe concurrent sagittal deformity. APSO is a powerful and effective technique to achieve multiplanar correction without higher risk of morbidity and complications compared with PSO for sagittal imbalance. However, APSO is associated with slightly longer ICU and hospital stays.

Persistent Iliosacral Joint Syndrome following Instrumentation to the Sacropelvis in Patients with Adult Spinal Deformity

2018 ◽  
Vol 80 (01) ◽  
pp. 015-025 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniela Diesing ◽  
Joerg Franke ◽  
Sven Tschoeke ◽  
Rolf Schultheiß ◽  
Kai Scheufler
Keyword(s):  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Spinal Deformity ◽  
Sacroiliac Joint ◽  
Roc Analysis ◽  
Pelvic Incidence ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Close Association ◽  
Adult Spinal Deformity ◽  
Interventional Treatment ◽  
Pelvic Fixation

Background and Objective Persistent sacroiliac joint syndrome (PSIJS) may complicate adult spinal deformity surgery (ASDS). This study assesses the relationship between clinical/morphometric parameters and PSIJS following ASDS including pelvic fixation and the therapeutic efficacy of secondary iliosacral fusion (ISF). Methods Perioperative health-related quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes (Oswestry Disability Index, Short Form 12-item health survey, version 2 scores) at 6, 12, and 24 months, and radiographic studies were analyzed retrospectively in a cohort of 71 consecutive patients undergoing ASDS. PSIJS was confirmed in nine individuals (12.7%) by placebo-controlled dual sacroiliac joint (SIJ) blocks. The relationships between global and regional spinopelvic morphometry, PSIJS, and HRQOL outcomes were assessed by logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis. Results PSIJS, independently causing significantly reduced improvement in HRQOL scores (p < 0.001) 6 months postoperatively, warranted secondary ISF in nine patients (12.7%) within 12 months of index surgery, without evidence of progressive SIJ arthrosis, pseudarthrosis, or hardware issues. Eight of nine patients undergoing secondary ISF reported≥ 70% pain reduction at 24 months. Logistic regression/ROC analysis revealed a close association between PSIJS and nonharmonious postoperative L4–S1 fractional lordosis (p < 0.0001), pelvic incidence angle > 53 degrees, hip arthrosis, and preexistent advanced SIJ arthrosis (p < 0.01). Conclusion PSIJS may negatively impact the clinical outcome of ASDS. Recurrent preoperative SIJ syndrome requiring interventional treatment, preexisting hip and SIJ arthrosis, insufficient restoration of L4–S1 fractional lordosis, and high pelvic incidence predispose to PSIJS. PSIJS may potentially be avoided by restoring physiologic lumbosacral geometry and S2 sacral alar-iliac screw fixation during index surgery. Secondary ISF appears to be effective in reducing pain and physical impairment due to PSIJS.

scholarly journals Clinical and radiographic parameters associated with best versus worst clinical outcomes in minimally invasive spinal deformity surgery

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khoi D. Than ◽  
Paul Park ◽  
Kai-Ming Fu ◽  
Stacie Nguyen ◽  
Michael Y. Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Spinal Deformity ◽  
Pelvic Incidence ◽  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
Adult Spinal Deformity ◽  
Vertical Axis ◽  
Leg Pain ◽  
Sagittal Vertical Axis ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Spinal Deformity Surgery

OBJECTIVE Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques are increasingly used to treat adult spinal deformity. However, standard minimally invasive spinal deformity techniques have a more limited ability to restore sagittal balance and match the pelvic incidence–lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) than traditional open surgery. This study sought to compare “best” versus “worst” outcomes of MIS to identify variables that may predispose patients to postoperative success. METHODS A retrospective review of minimally invasive spinal deformity surgery cases was performed to identify parameters in the 20% of patients who had the greatest improvement in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores versus those in the 20% of patients who had the least improvement in ODI scores at 2 years' follow-up. RESULTS One hundred four patients met the inclusion criteria, and the top 20% of patients in terms of ODI improvement at 2 years (best group, 22 patients) were compared with the bottom 20% (worst group, 21 patients). There were no statistically significant differences in age, body mass index, pre- and postoperative Cobb angles, pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence, levels fused, operating room time, and blood loss between the best and worst groups. However, the mean preoperative ODI score was significantly higher (worse disability) at baseline in the group that had the greatest improvement in ODI score (58.2 vs 39.7, p < 0.001). There was no difference in preoperative PI-LL mismatch (12.8° best vs 19.5° worst, p = 0.298). The best group had significantly less postoperative sagittal vertical axis (SVA; 3.4 vs 6.9 cm, p = 0.043) and postoperative PI-LL mismatch (10.4° vs 19.4°, p = 0.027) than the worst group. The best group also had better postoperative visual analog scale back and leg pain scores (p = 0.001 and p = 0.046, respectively). CONCLUSIONS The authors recommend that spinal deformity surgeons using MIS techniques focus on correcting a patient's PI-LL mismatch to within 10° and restoring SVA to < 5 cm. Restoration of these parameters seems to impact which patients will attain the greatest degree of improvement in ODI outcomes, while the spines of patients who do the worst are not appropriately corrected and may be fused into a fixed sagittal plane deformity.

Failure Types and Related Factors of Spinopelvic Fixation After Long Construct Fusion for Adult Spinal Deformity

Neurosurgery ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Se-Jun Park ◽  
Jin-Sung Park ◽  
Yunjin Nam ◽  
Tae-Hoon Yum ◽  
Youn-Taek Choi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Ct Scan ◽  
Spinal Deformity ◽  
Adult Spinal Deformity ◽  
Study Cohort ◽  
Related Factors ◽  
Fixation Failure ◽  
Failure Group ◽  
Pelvic Fixation ◽  
Spinopelvic Fixation

Abstract BACKGROUND Rigid internal fixation of the spine is an essential part of adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. Despite the use of pelvic fixation and anterior column support, spinopelvic fixation failure (SPFF) still remains an issue. Few studies have evaluated the types of such failure or its related factors. OBJECTIVE To classify the types of SPFF and investigate its risk factors, including the fusion status at L5-S1 on CT scan. METHODS The study cohort consisted of ninety-eight ASD patients who underwent more than 4-level fusions to the sacrum with interbody fusion at L5-S1. Patients with SPFF were divided into the two groups: above-S1 and below-S1 failure groups. The patient, surgical, and radiographic variables in each group were compared to those of the no-failure group. The L5-S1 fusion status was assessed using 2-yr computed tomography (CT) scan. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the risk factors for each failure group. RESULTS The mean age was 68.5 yr. Follow-up duration was 55.7 mo. The SPFF developed in 46 (46.9%) patients at 32.7 mo postoperatively. There were 15 patients in the above-S1 failure group and 31 patients in the below-S1 failure group. Multivariate analysis revealed that nonunion at L5-S1 was a single risk factor for above-S1 failure. In contrast, the risk factors for below-S1 failure included a greater number of fused segments and postoperative less thoracic kyphosis. CONCLUSION SPFF develops in different patterns with different risk factors. Above-S1 SPFF was associated with nonunion at L5-S1, while below-S1 SPFF was associated with mechanical stress.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document