scholarly journals THE UTILITY OF MRI IN CLINICAL DECISION-MAKING FOR PEDIATRIC ATHLETES WITH SYMPTOMATIC SUBFIBULAR OSSICLES

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4_suppl3) ◽  
pp. 2325967120S0023
Author(s):  
James G. Gamble ◽  
Charles M Chan ◽  
Lawrence A Rinsky ◽  
Steven L. Frick ◽  
Kevin G. Shea
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Operative Management ◽  
Lateral Malleolus ◽  
Ankle Fractures ◽  
Mri Findings ◽  
Avulsion Fractures ◽  
Non Operative Management

Background: Pediatric athletes commonly sustain inversion-type ankle fractures.1,2 Approximately 1% will form post-traumatic subfibular ossicles (SO), especially after tip avulsion fractures.3,4 Athletes with SOs can have pain and recurrent sprains.5,6,7 Here we show the utility of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in clinical decision-making for athletes with ankle symptoms and the presence of a SO. Our hypothesis is that MRI can predict which athletes have a stable SO and will respond to non-operative management, and which athletes have an unstable SO and will need surgery. Methods: We performed an IRB approved retrospective cohort study. Children were eligible from our practices if (1) they had radiographic evidence of a SO, (2) they had symptoms of pain and recurrent sprains, and (3) they had undergone MRI during their clinical evaluation. We identified 19 eligible children (20 ankles;) eight girls and eleven boys, ages 5–19 years. Nine involved the left ankle; 11 the right ankle. Most frequent sport was soccer (12/16) followed by basketball (3/14.) From the radiograph we determined ossicle size and location. MRI images were considered positive if fluid-sensitive sequences showed a high-intensity signal between the SO and the fibular epiphysis. Main outcome was treatment (non-surgical or surgical) relative to the MRI findings. Results: Size shape and location: Size and shape were variable. Width ranged from 2 – 10.4 mm and length from 4 – 13.5 mm. Concerning location all were in the distal 1/3 pf the epiphysis. Six were anterior and 14 were anterior-inferior to the fibular tip. MRI findings: Sixteen of the 20 ankles (80%) had positive MRI findings (figure 1), and 4 had negative findings (figure 2). The ATFL attached directly to the fragment in 11 of the 16 MRI positive ankles. Clinical decision making: All athletes with negative MRI findings responded to non-operatively management. Ten of the 16 ankles with positive MRIs have had surgery. Eight had excision of the ossicle and two had internal fixation based on the size of the ossicle. Surgical findings confirmed attachment of the ATFL to the fragment (figure 3.) Six athletes with positive MRIs continue to be under observation. Conclusions The results support our hypothesis that MRI has predictive value in clinical decision-making for symptomatic athletes with a SO. When fluid-sensitive MRI sequences show high signal intensity between the ossicle and the fibular epiphysis, and when the ATFL attaches to the ossicle, the athlete has a poor prognosis for non-operative management. [Figure: see text][Figure: see text] References: Su AW, Larson AN. Pediatric ankle fractures: Concepts and treatment principles. Foot Ankle Clin. 2015;20(4):705-719. Pommering TL, Kluchurosky L, Hall SL. Ankle and foot injuries in pediatric and adult athletes. Prim Care 2005;32(1):133-161. Han SH, Choi WJ, Kim S, Kim S-J, Lee JW. Ossicles associate with chronic pain around the malleoli of the ankle. 2008;90-B:1049-1054. Gamble JG, Sugi M, Tileston KR, Chan CM, Livingston KS. The natural history of type VII all-epiphyseal fractures of the lateral malleolus. Orthop J Sports Med. 2019; 7(3) (suppl 1) DOI 10.1177/2325967119S00116. Pill SG, Hatch M, Linton JM, Davidson RS. JBJS 2013;95: e115(1-6). Han SH, Choi WJ, Kim S, Kim SJ, Lee JW. Ossicles associated with chronic pain around the malleoli of the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90(8):1049-1054. Danielsson LG. Avulsion fracture of the lateral malleolus in children. Injury 12:165-167

scholarly journals Validation of the revised 2018 AAST-OIS classification and the CT severity index for prediction of operative management and survival in patients with blunt spleen and liver injuries

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (12) ◽  
pp. 6570-6581 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dagmar Morell-Hofert ◽  
Florian Primavesi ◽  
Margot Fodor ◽  
Eva Gassner ◽  
Veronika Kranebitter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Blunt Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Outcome Prediction ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
American Association ◽  
Severity Index ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Operative Management ◽  
Non Operative Management

Abstract Objectives Non-operative management (NOM) is increasingly utilised in blunt abdominal trauma. The 1994 American Association of Surgery of Trauma grading (1994-AAST) is applied for clinical decision-making in many institutions. Recently, classifications incorporating contrast extravasation such as the CT severity index (CTSI) and 2018 update of the liver and spleen AAST were proposed to predict outcome and guide treatment, but validation is pending. Methods CT images of patients admitted 2000–2016 with blunt splenic and hepatic injury were systematically re-evaluated for 1994/2018-AAST and CTSI grading. Diagnostic accuracy, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and positive and negative predictive values were calculated for prediction of in-hospital mortality. Correlation with treatment strategy was assessed by Cramer V statistics. Results Seven hundred and three patients were analysed, 271 with splenic, 352 with hepatic and 80 with hepatosplenic injury. Primary NOM was applied in 83% of patients; mortality was 4.8%. Comparing prediction of mortality in mild and severe splenic injuries, the CTSI (3.1% vs. 10.3%; diagnostic accuracy = 75.4%; DOR = 3.66; p = 0.006) and 1994-AAST (3.3% vs. 10.5%; diagnostic accuracy = 77.9%; DOR = 3.45; p = 0.010) were more accurate compared with the 2018-AAST (3.4% vs. 8%; diagnostic accuracy = 68.2%; DOR = 2.50; p = 0.059). In hepatic injuries, the CTSI was superior to both AAST classifications in terms of diagnostic accuracy (88.7% vs. 77.1% and 77.3%, respectively). CTSI and 2018-AAST correlated better with the need for surgery in severe vs. mild hepatic (Cramer V = 0.464 and 0.498) and splenic injuries (Cramer V = 0.273 and 0.293) compared with 1994-AAST (Cramer V = 0.389 and 0.255; all p < 0.001). Conclusions The 2018-AAST and CTSI are superior to the 1994-AAST in correlation with operative treatment in splenic and hepatic trauma. The CTSI outperforms the 2018-AAST in mortality prediction. Key Points • Non-operative management of blunt abdominal trauma is increasingly applied and correct patient stratification is crucial. • CT-based scoring systems are used to assess injury severity and guide clinical decision-making, whereby the 1994 version of the American Association of Surgery of Trauma Organ Injury Scale (AAST-OIS) is currently most commonly utilised. • Including contrast media extravasation in CT-based grading improves management and outcome prediction. While the 2018-AAST classification and the CT-severity-index (CTSI) better correlate with need for surgery compared to the 1994-AAST, the CTSI is superior in outcome-prediction to the 2018-AAST.

scholarly journals Routine Follow-Up Radiographs for Ankle Fractures Seldom Add Value to Clinical Decision-Making: A Retrospective, Observational Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 57 (5) ◽  
pp. 957-960 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pieter van Gerven ◽  
Nikki L. Weil ◽  
Marco F. Termaat ◽  
Sidney M. Rubinstein ◽  
Mostafa El Moumni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Observational Study ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Ankle Fractures ◽  
Retrospective Observational Study

Avoiding anchoring bias in unexplained chronic pain: an unexpected diagnosis of synovial osteochondromatosis

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. e240462
Author(s):  
Rehana Murani ◽  
Ranita Harpreet Kaur Manocha
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Diagnostic Error ◽  
Synovial Osteochondromatosis ◽  
Unexplained Pain ◽  
Anchoring Bias ◽  
History Of ◽  
Yellow Flags

Unconscious biases may influence clinical decision making, leading to diagnostic error. Anchoring bias occurs when a physician relies too heavily on the initial data received. We present a 57-year-old man with a 3-year history of unexplained right thigh pain who was referred to a physiatry clinic for suggestions on managing presumed non-organic pain. The patient had previously been assessed by numerous specialists and had undergone several imaging investigations, with no identifiable cause for his pain. Physical examination was challenging and there were several ‘yellow flags’ on history. A thorough reconsideration of the possible diagnoses led to the discovery of hip synovial osteochondromatosis as the cause for his symptoms. Over-reliance on the referral information may have led to this diagnosis being missed. In patients with unexplained pain, it is important to be aware of anchoring bias in order to avoid missing rare diagnoses.

scholarly journals Neuroimaging findings in pediatric sports-related concussion

2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 241-247 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Ellis ◽  
Jeff Leiter ◽  
Thomas Hall ◽  
Patrick J. McDonald ◽  
Scott Sawyer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Arachnoid Cyst ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Demyelinating Disease ◽  
Skull Fracture ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Return To Play ◽  
Mri Findings ◽  
Imaging Results ◽  
The Impact

OBJECT The goal in this review was to summarize the results of clinical neuroimaging studies performed in patients with sports-related concussion (SRC) who were referred to a multidisciplinar ypediatric concussion program. METHODS The authors conducted a retrospective review of medical records and neuroimaging findings for all patients referred to a multidisciplinary pediatric concussion program between September 2013 and July 2014. Inclusion criteria were as follows: 1) age ≤ 19 years; and 2) physician-diagnosed SRC. All patients underwent evaluation and follow-up by the same neurosurgeon. The 2 outcomes examined in this review were the frequency of neuroimaging studies performed in this population (including CT and MRI) and the findings of those studies. Clinical indications for neuroimaging and the impact of neuroimaging findings on clinical decision making were summarized where available. This investigation was approved by the local institutional ethics review board. RESULTS A total of 151 patients (mean age 14 years, 59% female) were included this study. Overall, 36 patients (24%) underwent neuroimaging studies, the results of which were normal in 78% of cases. Sixteen percent of patients underwent CT imaging; results were normal in 79% of cases. Abnormal CT findings included the following: arachnoid cyst (1 patient), skull fracture (2 patients), suspected intracranial hemorrhage (1 patient), and suspected hemorrhage into an arachnoid cyst (1 patient). Eleven percent of patients underwent MRI; results were normal in 75% of cases. Abnormal MRI findings included the following: intraparenchymal hemorrhage and sylvian fissure arachnoid cyst (1 patient); nonhemorrhagic contusion (1 patient); demyelinating disease (1 patient); and posterior fossa arachnoid cyst, cerebellar volume loss, and nonspecific white matter changes (1 patient). CONCLUSIONS Results of clinical neuroimaging studies are normal in the majority of pediatric patients with SRC. However, in selected cases neuroimaging can provide information that impacts decision making about return to play and retirement from the sport.

scholarly journals How Well Do Current Laboratory Biomarkers Inform Clinical Decision-Making in Chronic Pain Management?

2021 ◽  
Vol Volume 14 ◽  
pp. 3695-3710
Author(s):  
Jonathan M Hagedorn ◽  
Joshua Gunn ◽  
Ryan Budwany ◽  
Ryan S D'Souza ◽  
Krishnan Chakravarthy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Pain Management ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Chronic Pain Management ◽  
Laboratory Biomarkers

The Utility of Serial Hemoglobin Monitoring in Non-Operative Management of Blunt Splenic Injury

2021 ◽  
pp. 000313482110488
Author(s):  
Nicolas S. Poupore ◽  
Nicole D. Boswell ◽  
Bryana Baginski ◽  
John Cull ◽  
Katherine F. Pellizzeri
Keyword(s):  
Chart Review ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Splenic Injury ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Operative Management ◽  
Blunt Splenic Injury ◽  
Non Operative Management ◽  
Trauma Bay

Background The Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST) states there is not enough evidence to recommend a particular frequency of measuring Hgb values for non-operative management (NOM) of blunt splenic injury (BSI). This study was performed to compare the utility of serial Hgb (SHgb) to daily Hgb (DHgb) in this population. Methods We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients with BSI between 2013 and 2019. Demographics, comorbidities, lab values, clinical decisions, and outcomes were gathered through a trauma database. Results A total of 562 patients arrive in the trauma bay with BSI. In the NOM group, 297 were successful and 37 failed NOM. Of those that failed NOM, 8 (21.6%) changed to OM due to a drop in Hgb. 5 (62.5%) were hypotensive first, 2 (25%) were no longer receiving SHgb, and 1 (12.5%) had a repeat CT scan and was embolized. DHgb patients were not significantly different from SHgb patients in injury severity, length of stay, the largest drop in Hgb, and incidence of failing NOM. Patients taking aspirin were more likely to fall below 7 g/dl at 48 and 72 hours into admission. Conclusions These results suggest that that trending SHgb may not influence clinical decision-making in NOM of BSI. Besides taking aspirin, risk factors for who would benefit from SHgb were not identified. Patients who received DHgb had similar injuries and outcomes than patients who received SHgb. Prospective studies are needed to evaluate the clinical utility of SHgb compared to DHgb.

Debates in Dysphagia Management: How Do You Use Evidence-Based Practice in Your Dysphagia Patient Care?

2011 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 121-123
Author(s):  
Jeri A. Logemann
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Clinical Judgment ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Evidence Based Practice ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Clinical Method ◽  
Do So

Evidence-based practice requires astute clinicians to blend our best clinical judgment with the best available external evidence and the patient's own values and expectations. Sometimes, we value one more than another during clinical decision-making, though it is never wise to do so, and sometimes other factors that we are unaware of produce unanticipated clinical outcomes. Sometimes, we feel very strongly about one clinical method or another, and hopefully that belief is founded in evidence. Some beliefs, however, are not founded in evidence. The sound use of evidence is the best way to navigate the debates within our field of practice.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document