scholarly journals The Novel Oral Anticoagulants (NOACs) for the Treatment of Cerebral Venous Thrombosis: A Case Study of 32 Vietnamese Patients

2021 ◽  
pp. 251660852110461
Author(s):  
Thang H. Nguyen ◽  
Triet M. Ngo ◽  
Bau V. Phan ◽  
Binh N. Pham ◽  
Nha T. T. Dao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Cerebral Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Novel Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Bleeding Complications ◽  
Safety Outcome ◽  
Randomized Controlled Studies ◽  
Clinical Presentations ◽  
Clinical Benefits

Background and Purpose: Cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) is a rare cause of cerebral infarction with diverse clinical presentations and outcomes. Novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) provide an alternative option of systemic anticoagulation in various thromboembolic conditions, but uncertainty exists over the use of NOACs among patients with CVT. We present our initial experience with the use of NOACs for CVT in Vietnam. Methods: We included consecutive patients diagnosed with CVT presenting to 115 People’s Hospital in Vietnam between May 2016 and July 2017 and who were treated with NOACs. Data on patient demographics, vascular risk factors, clinical presentations, and outcomes at 180 days follow-up were obtained and analyzed. Modified Rankin scale (mRS) scores on admission, at discharge, and 180 days were assessed. Recanalization was assessed using magnetic resonance venography at 180 days follow-up. Venous thrombo-embolism events were defined as primary outcome, while bleeding complications were defined as safety outcome. Results: Among 32 patients with CVT (72% females; mean age: 40 ± 9.7 years), 15 were treated with rivaroxaban and 17 with dabigatran. A common risk factor was the usage of oral contraception (70%) on presentation. The mean mRS score on admission was 3.1 points (± 1.4). At FUP (median 8.5 months, IQR 5.5-9.5), clinical outcome (mRS ≤ 1) was excellent in most patients. All patients had at least partial recanalization and half of them achieved complete recanalization at 180 days follow-up. There were no bleeding complications. Conclusion: NOACs may offer clinical benefits with minimal complications in the treatment of CVT. Further prospective assessment with randomized controlled studies is warranted.

Abstract W P223: Treatment of Cervical Artery Dissection with Different Antithrombotic Agents

Stroke ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 45 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fan Z Caprio ◽  
Deborah Bergman ◽  
Yvonne Curran ◽  
Richard Bernstein ◽  
Shyam Prabhakaran
Keyword(s):  
Recurrent Stroke ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Antiplatelet Agents ◽  
Novel Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Bleeding Complications ◽  
Artery Dissection ◽  
Cervical Artery Dissection ◽  
Cervical Artery ◽  
Hemorrhagic Complications

Background and Purpose: Antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants are both accepted and commonly used agents for treatment of cervical artery dissection (CAD), though randomized clinical trials are lacking. We report on the use of novel oral anticoagulants for CAD and compared their efficacy and safety to traditional anticoagulants. Methods: We retrospectively identified patients diagnosed with CAD at a single academic center between July 2010 and December 2012. Patients treated with novel anticoagulants (NOAC: dabigatran or rivaroxaban), other anticoagulants (AC: warfarin, heparin, or low molecular weight heparin), or antiplatelet agents (AP: aspirin, clopidogrel, or aspirin-dypyridamole) were compared for baseline characteristics, recurrent stroke, vessel recanalization on follow-up, and bleeding complications using Fisher’s exact and student t-tests. Results: During the study period, 110 patients with CAD were included, of whom 20 (18%), 61 (55%), and 29 (26%) were treated initially with a NOAC, AC, and AP, respectively. Clinical follow-up was available in 98 (89.1%) patients while radiographic follow-up was available in 88 (80%) patients. NOAC-treated patients were more likely to have presented with ischemic stroke symptoms (90% vs. 55.7%, p=0.007) but had similar rates of severe stenosis (60% vs. 53.3%, p=0.522) and intraluminal/intramural thrombus (70% vs. 57.6%, p=0.327) on initial vascular imaging compared to AC patients. There was 1 recurrent stroke in the NOAC group and 1 in the AC group. Similar proportions of patients had resolved or improved stenosis on follow-up imaging (NOAC: 66.7 vs. AC: 63.3%, p=0.217). Hemorrhagic complications were more likely to occur in AC compared to NOAC patients (17.0% vs. 0%, p=0.019). Conclusion: In this retrospective study, use of novel oral anticoagulants for CAD was associated with similar rates of recurrent stroke and vessel recanalization on follow-up imaging but with fewer hemorrhagic complications. Given their safety profile, NOACs may be a reasonable alternative to traditional anticoagulants in CAD. Prospective validation of these findings is needed.

Evaluation of direct oral anticoagulants and vitamin K antagonists in mesenteric venous thrombosis

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 171-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saman Salim ◽  
Olle Ekberg ◽  
Johan Elf ◽  
Moncef Zarrouk ◽  
Anders Gottsäter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Bleeding Complications ◽  
Mesenteric Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Esophageal Variceal ◽  
Esophageal Variceal Bleeding

Background/aim Mesenteric venous thrombosis is a rare lethal disease. The main aim of the present study was to evaluate clinical efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants and vitamin K antagonists in mesenteric venous thrombosis patients. Methods Retrospective study of 102 mesenteric venous thrombosis patients treated between 2004 and 2017 at a center with a conservative medical first approach. Median clinical follow-up was 4 years. Results Computed tomography showed successful recanalization of thrombosis in 71% of patients on vitamin K antagonists and 69% of patients on direct oral anticoagulants ( p = 0.88). Overall major and esophageal variceal bleeding rate was 14.7% and 2.9%, respectively. No difference in major bleeding ( p = 0.54) was found between vitamin K antagonists and direct oral anticoagulants. No mesenteric venous thrombosis recurrence occurred during follow-up, and one venous thromboembolism occurred after cessation of anticoagulation. Conclusion Anticoagulation with direct oral anticoagulants and vitamin K antagonists was efficient in patients with mesenteric venous thrombosis. Bleeding complications was a concern during treatment in both groups.

scholarly journals Rivaroxaban for the treatment of cerebral venous thrombosis

BMC Neurology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Esmaeili ◽  
Meysam Abolmaali ◽  
Sobhan Aarabi ◽  
Mohammad Reza Motamed ◽  
Samira Chaibakhsh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Cerebral Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Term Treatment ◽  
Background Information ◽  
Minor Bleeding ◽  
Long Term Treatment ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background New Oral Anticoagulants (NOACs) such as Rivaroxaban are introduced as alternatives to conventional vitamin-K antagonists in the long-term treatment of thrombotic events due to their lower bleeding risk. There is a lack of evidence on the effectiveness and safety of Rivaroxaban in Cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT). This study aims to assess the effectiveness and bleeding risk of Rivaroxaban in comparison with Warfarin for the treatment of CVT. Materials and methods 36 patients with diagnosis of CVT were included. Clinical and background information was assessed on admission and patients were followed for at least 12 months. Measured outcomes were modified Rankin Scale (mRS), evidence of recanalization on contrast-enhanced Brain MR venography (MRV) and major or minor bleeding. Patients were divided into two groups according to the type of oral anticoagulant (Rivaroxaban vs Warfarin). Groups were compared in terms of final outcomes and side effects. Result Overall, 13 (36.11%) patients received Warfarin and 23 (63.89%) received Rivaroxaban. Optimal mRS score (0–1) was attained in 9 of 10 (90%) of patients treated with Rivaroxaban and 19 of 22 (86.36%) of patients received Warfarin. MRV showed complete or partial recanalization in 12 of 14 (85.71%) patients treated with Rivaroxaban and all patients in the Warfarin group. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of major and minor hemorrhage. Conclusion Rivaroxaban holds promise for the treatment of CVT.

scholarly journals Cerebral Venous Thrombosis Case Series at a Tertiary Care Hospital: Exploring Treatment Safety and Efficacy of Direct Oral Anticoagulants

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3658-3658
Author(s):  
Mohammed Abdullah Alsheef ◽  
Mukhtar Alomar ◽  
Abdul Rehman Z. Zaidi ◽  
Ghaydaa Juma Kullab ◽  
Mohammed AlHazzaa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Cerebral Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Case Report Form ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Number Of Patients

Background: Cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) is an uncommon cause of stroke that mainly affects young adults and children. Initial treatment with heparin followed by wafarin is the mainstay of treatment. Only insufficient experience is available for direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Aims: The study aims to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of DOACs such as (Rivaroxaban and Dabigatran) in patients with objectively confirmed CVT. Methods: Data of 46 cases of CVT collected using a standardized case report form. Inclusion criteria were patients diagnosed with CVT, confirmed by CT or MRI imaging. Results: The total number of patients was 46 (9 males and 37 females). The mean age of the patients was 35.2± 5 years. The most common clinical manifestations among our patients were headache followed by seizure. 52% of cases were unprovoked, while 48% were provoked by pregnancy and oral contraceptive pills. Superior sagittal sinus (55%) and transverse sinus (44.9%) were the most common sites. Involvement of more than three venous sinuses was 34.8%. Thrombophilic abnormality was detected in 21.7% of patients. Initiation of anticoagulation (AC) was mostly low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) (80%), followed by unfractionated heparin (UFH) (17.7%) and fondaparinex (2%). Maintenance AC with Rivaroxaban after heparin (LMWH/UFH) was in 63% of our patients, the rest were switched from Warfarin to Rivaroxaban (34.8%), and one was treated by Dabigatran (2%). CVT recurrence was observed in one patient. Major bleeding (according to ISTH criteria) was not reported in our case series. Conclusions: DOACs demonstrated good safety and efficacy profile and can potentially replace warfarin in CVT patients. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals The use of novel oral anticoagulants compared to vitamin K antagonists (warfarin) in patients with left ventricular thrombus after acute myocardial infarction

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel A Jones ◽  
Paul Wright ◽  
Momin A Alizadeh ◽  
Sadeer Fhadil ◽  
Krishnaraj S Rathod ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Thrombus ◽  
Novel Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Ventricular Thrombus

Abstract Aim Current guidelines recommend the use of vitamin K antagonist (VKA) for up to 3–6 months for treatment of left ventricular (LV) thrombus post-acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, based on evidence supporting non-inferiority of novel oral anticoagulants (NOAC) compared to VKA for other indications such as deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism (PE), and thromboembolic prevention in atrial fibrillation, NOACs are being increasingly used off licence for the treatment of LV thrombus post-AMI. In this study, we investigated the safety and effect of NOACs compared to VKA on LV thrombus resolution in patients presenting with AMI. Methods and results This was an observational study of 2328 consecutive patients undergoing coronary angiography ± percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for AMI between May 2015 and December 2018, at a UK cardiac centre. Patients’ details were collected from the hospital electronic database. The primary endpoint was rate of LV thrombus resolution with bleeding rates a secondary outcome. Left ventricular thrombus was diagnosed in 101 (4.3%) patients. Sixty patients (59.4%) were started on VKA and 41 patients (40.6%) on NOAC therapy (rivaroxaban: 58.5%, apixaban: 36.5%, and edoxaban: 5.0%). Both groups were well matched in terms of baseline characteristics including age, previous cardiac history (previous myocardial infarction, PCI, coronary artery bypass grafting), and cardiovascular risk factors (hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolaemia). Over the follow-up period (median 2.2 years), overall rates of LV thrombus resolution were 86.1%. There was greater and earlier LV thrombus resolution in the NOAC group compared to patients treated with warfarin (82% vs. 64.4%, P = 0.0018, at 1 year), which persisted after adjusting for baseline variables (odds ratio 1.8, 95% confidence interval 1.2–2.9). Major bleeding events during the follow-up period were lower in the NOAC group, compared with VKA group (0% vs. 6.7%, P = 0.030) with no difference in rates of systemic thromboembolism (5% vs. 2.4%, P = 0.388). Conclusion These data suggest improved thrombus resolution in post-acute coronary syndrome (ACS) LV thrombosis in patients treated with NOACs compared to VKAs. This improvement in thrombus resolution was accompanied with a better safety profile for NOAC patients vs. VKA-treated patients. Thus, provides data to support a randomized trial to answer this question.

scholarly journals Anticoagulation Use prior to Common Dental Procedures: A Systematic Review

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johnny Chahine ◽  
Marwan N. Khoudary ◽  
Samer Nasr
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Oral Anticoagulation ◽  
Thromboembolic Event ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Novel Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Thromboembolic Risk ◽  
Dental Procedures ◽  
Number Of Patients

Currently, the number of patients on oral anticoagulation is increasing. There is a paucity of data regarding maintaining oral anticoagulation (especially novel oral anticoagulants) around the time of specific dental procedures. A dentist has three options: either to stop anticoagulation, to continue it, or to bridge with heparin. A systematic review of 10 clinical trials was conducted to address this issue. It was found that continuing anticoagulation during dental procedures did not increase the risk of bleeding in most trials. Although none of the studies reported a thromboembolic event after interruption of anticoagulation, the follow-up periods were short and inconsistent, and the heightened thromboembolic risk when stopping anticoagulation is well known in the literature. Heparin bridging was associated with an increased bleeding incidence. We recommend maintaining oral anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists and novel oral anticoagulants for the vast majority of dental procedures along with the use of local hemostatic agents.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document