Challenges in the definition of input motions for forensic ground-response analysis in the near-source region

2021 ◽  
pp. 875529302110013
Author(s):  
Nikolaos Ntritsos ◽  
Misko Cubrinovski ◽  
Brendon A Bradley

This article scrutinizes the determination of input motions for forensic ground-response analysis in the near-source region, based on recorded surface ground motions at strong-motion station sites, from the same event. The first part of the article draws upon observed ground motions from the 22 February 2011 6.2 Mw Christchurch earthquake to discuss key challenges of the problem associated with the strong spatial variation of ground motion in the near-source region. Effects from the complexity of the rupture, propagation of seismic waves through complex geological structures, and site characteristics are explored. It is argued that, because of the strongly varying source-path “signature” on near-source ground motions, “reference” input motions for ground-response analysis must be specific to, and have similar signature characteristics (be “compatible”) with, the target site which is subject to the analysis. The second part of the article presents a four-step procedure for the derivation of site-specific input motions involving (1) determination of the reference layer where the input motion is to be applied in the analysis, (2) record selection considering the appropriateness of the recording station site for deconvolution and its compatibility with the target site, (3) deconvolution of the selected record to remove local site effects from the recorded ground motion, and (4) scaling of the deconvolved motion to account for differences in the source-to-site distance between the recording station and the target site. As part of the proposed procedure, a novel (amplitude-duration) scaling method is presented. Results from one-dimensional (1D) effective-stress analysis of two target Christchurch sites using input motions from the proposed procedure are used to critically evaluate the procedure and discuss essential requirements for its successful application.

2013 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shiv Shankar Kumar ◽  
A. Murali Krishna

In this study, one dimensional equivalent–linear ground response analyses were performed for some typical sites in the Guwahati city, India. Six bore locations covering about 250 km2 area of the city were considered for the analyses. As the strong motion significantly influences the ground response, seven different recorded ground motions, varying in magnitude (6.1 to 8.1) and other ground motion parameters, were adopted. Seismic site analyses were carried out for all layers of borelogs using all the seven earthquakes. Results are presented in terms of surface acceleration histories, strain and shear stress ratio variation, response spectrum, Fourier amplitude ratio versus frequency. The results indicate that accelerations were amplified the most at the surface level. The range of peak ground acceleration (PGA) values obtained at the ground surface is about 0.2 g to 0.79 for a range of PGA considered at bedrock level (rigid half space at bottom of borelog) of 0.1 g to 0.34 g. The Fourier amplifications of ground motion at surface are in the range of 4.14 – 8.99 for a frequency band of 1.75 Hz to 3.13 Hz. The maximum spectral acceleration at six locations varies in the range of 1.0 g – 4.71 g for all the seven earthquakes. The study clearly demonstrated the role for site effect and the type of ground motion on the ground response. For a given earthquake motion, amplification factors at surface level change by almost about 20% to 70% depending on local site conditions.


2014 ◽  
Vol 919-921 ◽  
pp. 1031-1034
Author(s):  
Xiao Fei Li ◽  
Rui Sun

In order to test the applicable of the two equivalent linear seismic response analysis procedures SHAKE2000 and LSSRLI-1 for class І site, 21 underground strong motion records were selected from 11 stations of KiK-net as input earthquake motions. By using these two programs to calculate the peak ground acceleration, soil maximum shear strain and acceleration response spectra. By comparing the results of the two procedures and the measured results to evaluate the proximity of these two methods and then judge which program is closer to the real situation. Studies have shown that in class І site, the results of SHAKE2000 and LSSRLI-1 differ little; but according to the measured records, there are some differences between the two programs results and the measured records. While no matter comparing from which side, SHAKE2000 is closer to the earthquake records.


2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-80
Author(s):  
T. G. Sitharam ◽  
Naveen James ◽  
Monalisha Nayak

The uniqueness of this paper is large amount of field test data and in addition laboratory test results on undisturbed soil samples, has been analyzed to capture the effect of local site condition and material properties of overlying soil on seismic ground motion characteristics. This study involves the seismic site characterization and ground response analysis of an offshore site in Western Yemen. From the results of field and laboratory tests, dynamic properties such as shear modulus and damping ratio for a very low to high strain levels was determined and site characterization was also carried out. Using seismic cone penetration test (SCPT) data a new correlation has been developed to predict the shear wave velocity. Synthetic ground motion was generated using Boore's stochastic modeling technique for ground response analysis and peak ground acceleration (PGA) was evaluated and presented in the paper. This paper also presents a site specific design response spectrum based on Eurocode, corresponding to 475 and 2500 year return period.


Author(s):  
A. Boominathan ◽  
S. Krishna Kumar

Design ground motions are usually developed by one of the two approaches: site-specific analyses or from provisions of building codes. Although contemporary codes do consider approximately the site effects, they provide more conservative estimates. Hence it is preferred to carry out site specific analysis which involves both the seismic hazard analysis and ground response analysis. This article presents a site specific analysis for a seismically vulnerable site near Ahmedabad, Gujarat. The seismic hazard analysis was carried out by DSHA approach considering seismicity and seismotectonics within 250km radius. The site is predominantly characterized by deep stiff sandy clay deposits. Extensive shear wave velocity measurement by cross hole test is used for site classification and ground response analysis. The ground response analysis was carried out by equivalent linear approach using SHAKE2000. It is found that the deep stiff soil site considered is found to amplify the ground motion. The site specific response spectra obtained from RRS analysis is compared with the codal provision which reveals high spectral acceleration in site specific spectra for mid period range.


2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 907-928 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bo Li ◽  
Mahesh D. Pandy ◽  
Kao-Shan Dai ◽  
Yang Lu ◽  
Yu-Zhou Zhou ◽  
...  

Ground-motion amplification factors (GMAFs) are used to characterize amplification of a ground motion propagating from the bedrock to the ground surface. They are usually determined by ground response analysis, in which the soil parameter variabilities and input motion uncertainties contribute to their uncertainty. The construction of design response spectra requires mean GMAFs or GMAFs with different probability levels. Thus, it is significant to study the sensitivity of soil parameter variabilities and the number of random soil profiles for the estimation of GMAFs. This study investigates the minimum number of random soil profiles required to represent the extent of the epistemic uncertainty in the GMAFs obtained from ground response analysis. It shows that at least 20 and 60 random soil profiles are respectively required to estimate the mean and standard deviations of GMAFs with the maximum relative difference below 10%. In addition, potential reasons for a reduction in the mean GMAFs resulting from randomization of the soil column properties are discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document