Comparison of Disk Diffusion, E-Test and Broth Microdilution Test in Determination of Susceptibility ofAspergillusSpecies to Amphotericin B, Itraconazole and Voriconazole

2008 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Ozkutuk ◽  
C. Ergon ◽  
D.Y. Metin ◽  
M. Yucesoy ◽  
S.H. Polat
Keyword(s):  
Amphotericin B ◽  
Disk Diffusion ◽  
Broth Microdilution

scholarly journals Categorizing susceptibility of clinical isolates of Candida auris to amphotericin B, caspofungin, and fluconazole utilizing the CLSI M44-A2 disk diffusion method

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalie S. Nunnally ◽  
Tajah Damm ◽  
Shawn R. Lockhart ◽  
Elizabeth L. Berkow
Keyword(s):  
Amphotericin B ◽  
Accurate Method ◽  
Clinical Isolates ◽  
Disk Diffusion ◽  
Diffusion Method ◽  
Broth Microdilution ◽  
Candida Auris ◽  
Disk Diffusion Method ◽  
Microdilution Method ◽  
Broth Microdilution Method

We evaluated the CLSI M44ed3E disk diffusion method in comparison with the CLSI M27ed4 broth microdilution method for caspofungin and fluconazole and the Etest method for amphotericin B to categorize susceptibility of 347 clinical isolates of Candida auris. Utilizing the zone diameter cutoffs established here we observed the overall categorial agreement between the two methods. For caspofungin, concordant results were observed for 98% of isolates with <1% very major and 1% major errors. For fluconazole, concordant results were observed for 91% of isolates with 1% very major and 8% major errors. For amphotericin B, concordant results were observed for 74% of isolates with <1% very major errors and 25% major errors. The disk diffusion approach provides an accurate method for determining the susceptibility of C. auris for caspofungin and fluconazole, and for identification of at least 75% of amphotericin B-susceptible isolates.

scholarly journals Comparison of the MICs Obtained by Gradient Concentration Strip and EUCAST Methods for Four Azole Drugs and Amphotericin B against Azole-Susceptible and -Resistant Aspergillus Section Fumigati Clinical Isolates

2019 ◽  
Vol 64 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Dellière ◽  
L. Verdurme ◽  
J. Bigot ◽  
E. Dannaoui ◽  
Y. Senghor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Amphotericin B ◽  
Sensu Stricto ◽  
Clinical Isolates ◽  
Broth Microdilution ◽  
Routine Testing ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Valuable Method ◽  
Resistant Strains ◽  
Potential Impact

ABSTRACT Reference methods used to assess the drug susceptibilities of Aspergillus fumigatus isolates consisted of EUCAST and CLSI standardized broth microdilution techniques. Considering the increasing rate and the potential impact on the clinical outcome of azole resistance in A. fumigatus, more suitable techniques for routine testing are needed. The gradient concentration strip (GCS) method has been favorably evaluated for yeast testing. The aim of this study was to compare the CGS test with EUCAST broth microdilution for amphotericin B (AMB), posaconazole (PCZ), itraconazole (ITZ), voriconazole (VRZ), and isavuconazole (ISA). A total of 121 Aspergillus section Fumigati strains were collected, including 24 A. fumigatus sensu stricto strains that were resistant to at least one azole drug. MICs were determined using GCS and EUCAST methods. Essential agreement between the 2 methods was considered when MICs fell within ±1 dilution or ±2 dilutions of the 2-fold dilution scale. Categorical agreement was defined as the percentage of strains classified in the same category (susceptible, intermediate, or resistant) with both methods. Essential agreements with ±1 dilution and ±2 dilutions were 96.7, 93.4, 90.0, 89.3, and 95% and 100, 99.2, 100, 97.5, and 100% for AMB, PCZ, ITZ, VRZ, and ISA, respectively. Categorical agreements were 94.3, 86.1, 89.3, and 88.5% for AMB, PCZ, ITZ, and VRZ, respectively. Detection of resistance was missed with the GCS for one strain (4.1%) for PCZ and for 2 strains (8.3%) for ISA. Determination of ITZ MICs using the GCS allowed the detection of 91.7% of azole-resistant strains. The GCS test appears to be a valuable method for screening azole-resistant A. fumigatus clinical isolates.

scholarly journals Precision and Accuracy of Fluconazole Susceptibility Testing by Broth Microdilution, Etest, and Disk Diffusion Methods

2002 ◽  
Vol 46 (6) ◽  
pp. 1781-1784 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. L. Barry ◽  
M. A. Pfaller ◽  
R. P. Rennie ◽  
P. C. Fuchs ◽  
S. D. Brown
Keyword(s):  
Reference Method ◽  
Disk Diffusion ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Broth Microdilution ◽  
Reference Test ◽  
Fluconazole Resistance ◽  
Mueller Hinton ◽  
Zones Of Inhibition ◽  
Mueller Hinton Agar

ABSTRACT Interpretive agreements among the results of fluconazole broth microdilution tests, Etests, and disk diffusion tests were documented by evaluating 495 Candida spp. Microdilution reference test results were in agreement with 96% of the Etest results; most discrepancies were minor differences. Fluconazole resistance of Candida krusei strains often required a full 48 h of incubation in order to be observed by the standard method. For the disk diffusion tests that were performed on Mueller-Hinton agar with glucose and methylene blue, 97% of results were in agreement with those of the reference test, especially when zones of inhibition were measured after the first 24 h of incubation. Some Candida glabrata isolates failed to grow satisfactorily until a full 48 h of incubation was completed. Precision was determined by testing 50 selected isolates in triplicate in each of three laboratories. The reproducibility of results of disk diffusion tests was comparable to that of the reference method. With all procedures, determination of test results was particularly challenging with some strains, and new methods are needed in order to improve endpoint definition.

Evaluation of methods for detection of β-lactamase production in MSSA

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Skov ◽  
David R Lonsway ◽  
Jesper Larsen ◽  
Anders Rhod Larsen ◽  
Jurgita Samulioniené ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Confirmatory Test ◽  
Disc Diffusion ◽  
Broth Microdilution ◽  
Confirmatory Tests ◽  
Correct Determination ◽  
Primary Test ◽  
Zone Edge ◽  
Evaluation Of Methods

Abstract Objectives Correct determination of penicillin susceptibility is pivotal for using penicillin in the treatment of Staphylococcus aureus infections. This study examines the performance of MIC determination, disc diffusion and a range of confirmatory tests for detection of penicillin susceptibility in S. aureus. Methods A total of 286 consecutive penicillin-susceptible S. aureus blood culture isolates as well as a challenge set of 62 MSSA isolates were investigated for the presence of the blaZ gene by PCR and subjected to penicillin-susceptibility testing using broth microdilution MIC determination, disc diffusion including reading of the zone edge, two nitrocefin tests and the cloverleaf test. Results Using PCR-based detection of blaZ as the gold standard, both broth microdilution MIC testing and disc diffusion testing resulted in a relatively low accuracy (82%–93%) with a sensitivity ranging from 49%–93%. Among the confirmatory tests, the cloverleaf test performed with 100% accuracy, while zone edge interpretation and nitrocefin-based tests increased the sensitivity of β-lactamase detection to 96%–98% and 82%–96% when using MIC determination or disc diffusion as primary test, respectively. Conclusions This investigation showed that reliable and accurate detection of β-lactamase production in S. aureus can be obtained by MIC determination or penicillin disc diffusion followed by interpretation of the zone edge as a confirmatory test for apparently penicillin-susceptible isolates. The more cumbersome cloverleaf test can also be used. Nitrocefin-based tests should not be used as the only test for confirmation of a presumptive β-lactamase-negative isolate.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document