Induction Therapy in Multiple Myeloma

Hematology ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 2008 (1) ◽  
pp. 306-312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Luc Harousseau

Abstract In most hematologic malignancies the role of induction treatment is to achieve complete remission (CR). In multiple myeloma this has been possible only with the introduction of high-dose therapy plus autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT). In the context of ASCT there is a statistical relationship between CR or very good partial remission (VGPR) achievement and progression-free survival or overall survival. High-dose therapy consists of 3 to 6 courses of a dexamethasone alone or combined with vincristine-adriamycin (VAD) to reduce the tumor burden and the plasma cell infiltration followed by 1 or 2 courses of high-dose melphalan plus ASCT. This treatment induces 20% to 40% CR and 40% to 55% CR/VGPR. The introduction of novel agents in the induction treatment is changing this scenario. The combinations of dexamethasone with thalidomide, bortezomib or lenalidomide increase the CR/VGPR rates compared to dexamethasone or VAD. Triple combinations are currently being evaluated, but preliminary results with not more than 3 or 4 cycles show post-ASCT CR/VGPR rates of 60% to 75% In elderly patients who are not candidates for ASCT, combinations of melphalan-prednisone with a novel agent (thalidomide, bortezomib or lenalidomide) yield CR/VGPR rates that are quite comparable to those achieved in younger patients with ASCT. Prolonged treatment with the combination of lenalidomide plus dexamethasone can be administered safely and appears to induce very high (up to 70%) CR/VGPR rates as well.

Author(s):  
Michel Attal ◽  
Murielle Roussel

Overview: Maintenance therapy in multiple myeloma has been under investigation for more than 3 decades and has been without evidence of clear advantage in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) until the mid-2000s. Neither conventional chemotherapy, prednisone, nor interferon-based maintenance regimens offered any benefit after conventional or high-dose therapy. Thalidomide was the first drug, mainly given as maintenance after high dose therapy, to demonstrate clinical benefits in terms of PFS and, in some studies, of overall survival (OS). The role of other novel agents such as lenalidomide and bortezomib as maintenance therapy is emerging. Lenalidomide has been shown to reduce the risk of relapse with longer follow-up needed to see if this will translate into a survival benefit. At present, a number of key questions remain unanswered. What are the optimal dose and duration of those treatments? Is the risk of toxicity and second primary malignancies acceptable? Will the disease be more aggressive at time of relapse? Is the clinical benefit predicted by initial prognostic factors and response to previous therapy? Does maintenance therapy work by further eradication of minimal residual disease or by immunological control of the malignant clone? Ongoing randomized trials are evaluating lenalidomide and bortezomib, both in the transplant and nontransplant settings, to better define the role of these drugs as maintenance in multiple myeloma.


Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 948-948 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergio Giralt ◽  
Rupi Thandi ◽  
Muzaffar Qazilbash ◽  
Floralyn Mendoza ◽  
Eric Han ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Thalidomide/Dexamethasone (TD) has become one of the most commonly used induction therapies for patients with symptomatic multiple myeloma (MM) eligible for high dose therapy (HDT) intensification with autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). Bortezomib (Velcade) has been added to the combination of TD (VTD) in an effort to reduce MM tumor burden further prior to HDT.The impact of this addition on HDT outcomes has not been fully explored. Purpose: To determine the impact of the addition of bortezomib to TD induction therapy in patients with MM undergoing HDT and ASCT consolidation. Patients and Methods: Patients were eligible for this analysis if they had undergone HDT with ASCT for first remission consolidation or primary refractory disease within 12 months of diagnosis between 9/03 and 12/05 and had received either TD or VTD as induction therapy. Patients receiving VTD after TD were excluded. Patients receiving more than 1 chemo regimen other than TD or VTD were excluded. Chemomobilization was NOT considered an exclusion criteria. Results A total of 78 patients qualified for the analysis (27 VTD; 51 TD). Patient and treatment characteristics are summarized in table 1. In brief, the patients receiving VTD had a higher rate of cytogenetic abnormalities and received less cycles of chemotherapy prior to SCT. Although pre-SCT response rates were similar between patients receiving VTD or TD (95% vs 92%) there was a trend for a higher CR rate in the VTD group (15% vs 6%). Post transplants response rates assessed between 3–6 months demonstrated that 28% and 38% of VTD patients achieved near CR and CR respectively while 19% and 23% had these responses post TD induction. There was no difference in 2 year OS and PFS among patients receiving VTD or TD (91% vs 81% and 35% and 56% respectively). Conclusion: Both VTD and TD as induction treatment are associated with high response rates prior to SCT as well as 6 months post SCT. In this retrospective analysis no survival benefit was seen for induction therapy with VTD over TD, despite higher near CR and CR rates. However randomized trials need to be performed addressing type of induction as well as duration of induction therapy prior to high dose therapy consolidation. Patient and Treatment Characteristics Variables VTD TD N 27 51 Median Age 54 (34–71) 56 (34–71) %ISS> 1 76% 65% % CG Abnormal 37% 19% p=.009 B2M @ Dx 2.99 3.19 Cycles Prior to SCT 2 4 p=.00009 % Mel 200 74% 69% Post SCT Maintenance 15/27 23/51


Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 5108-5108
Author(s):  
Wanda M. Knopinska-Posluszny ◽  
Andrzej Hellmann ◽  
Michal Taszner ◽  
Anna Dmoszynska ◽  
Wiktor Jedrzejczak ◽  
...  

Abstract In recent years high-dose therapy with autoHSCT has become the treatment of choice for eligible patients with multiple myeloma. This disease is now one of the most common indications for autotransplantation. The aim of this study was the clinical assessment of patients who underwent autotransplantation of progenitor cells and an analysis of the results of conducted treatment. The Polish Myeloma Group collected results of auto HSCT from 12 transplantology centres in Poland conducted between 1995 and 2006. We analyzed retrospectively the prognostic influence of pre-transplant characteristics on response and survival in 498 patients. Virtually all the patients received peripheral blood stem cell support after conditioning with melphalan (95%). We evaluated the influence of age, type of myeloma, Durie-Salmon stage, presence of renal impairment, plasma cell infiltration, albumin and b2 microglobulin level at diagnosis, status prior to and post HSCT, time from diagnosis to HSCT on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) to define patients with better prognosis. 232 females and 266 males underwent auto HSCT, and these included 297 (59,6%) with IgG, 97 (19,5%) with IgA, 31 (6%) with B-J, 22 (4,4%) with non-secretory myeloma. Bone structure changes were ascertained in 355 patients (71%). Bone marrow involvement higher than 20% was found in 282 patients (56,6%) at diagnosis. A decreased level of albumin (<35g/l) was determined in 168 patients (33,7%), and b2microglobuline level above 3,5 mg/l in 124 patients (24,9%). Transplantation of progenitor cells was conducted as consolidation of first line treatment following chemotherapy according to VAD in the majority of patients (74,7%). This number increased to 246 (49,4%) following transplantation. Double transplantation was conducted in 132 patients (26,5%). Median OS and PFS obtained were 3272 (1391–4232) and 1158 (102–3767) days respectively. CR achieved before transplantation, normal renal function, albumin level above 35g/l, b2 mikroglobulin below 3,5mg/l and DS stage I, were associated with a longer OS and PFS (p<0,05). This retrospective, multicenter study confirms the efficacy and safety of autoHSCT in multiple myeloma patients. Additional confirmation is given of the increased rate of CR, and the significantly prolonged survival observed in complete responders. Taking the above into account the employment of new drugs, such as thalidomide or bortezomib, which allow the achievement of a higher percentage of remissions should in the future bring about an improvement of the efficacy of transplantation in multiple myeloma.


Haematologica ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 92 (10) ◽  
pp. 1399-1406 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. J.K. van de Velde ◽  
X. Liu ◽  
G. Chen ◽  
A. Cakana ◽  
W. Deraedt ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 81-88
Author(s):  
Helge Menzel ◽  
Katarzyna Hinmüller ◽  
Hans-Jochem Kolb ◽  
Tibor Schuster ◽  
Alexander Hoellein ◽  
...  

Objective: Induction high-dose chemotherapy followed by myeloablative melphalan (HD-Mel) treatment and autologous hematopoietic stem-cell support (autoSCT) is a standard treatment for multiple myeloma (MM) either upfront or in relapse after conventional treatment. We performed a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients undergoing a late repeat HD-Mel/autoSCT treatment for MM. Methods: Data from 24 consecutive patients with MM who underwent a myeloablative treatment with HD-Mel late after completion of upfront first high-dose therapy were assessed for toxicity, response, progression-free survival (PFS) and time to next treatment (TTNT). These data were correlated with the results obtained after the initial high dose therapy and autoSCT. Results: A total of 23 patients were treated with novel drugs (lenalidomide, thalidomide, bortezomib) after relapse to initial autoSCT. The median overall survival (OS) of all patients was 90 months. 19 patients (79%) achieved a very good partial remission (VGPR) or complete remission (CR) after initial autoSCT, compared with 42% after late autoSCT. PFS and TTNT were 19 and 24 months after initial compared with 13 and 21 months after late autoSCT. Univariate analysis identified initial response duration and the achievement of a CR/VGPR after the initial transplantation to be associated with prolonged response after repeat autoSCT. Conclusions: Our data indicate that late high-dose treatment followed by autoSCT is safe and effective after upfront intensive treatment, can bridge to allogeneic SCT, and encourage collection of an additional graft.


Blood ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 102 (7) ◽  
pp. 2345-2350 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ranjit K. Dasgupta ◽  
Peter J. Adamson ◽  
Faith E. Davies ◽  
Sara Rollinson ◽  
Philippa L. Roddam ◽  
...  

Abstract Glutathione S-transferase P1 (GSTP1) is a phase 2 drug metabolism enzyme involved in the metabolism and detoxification of a range of chemotherapeutic agents. A single nucleotide polymorphism (Ile105Val) results in a variant enzyme with lower thermal stability and altered catalytic activity. We hypothesized that patients with the less stable variant have a decreased ability to detoxify chemotherapeutic substrates, including melphalan, and have an altered outcome following treatment for multiple myeloma. We have assessed the impact of GSTP1 codon 105 polymorphisms in 222 patients entered into the Medical Research Council (MRC) myeloma VII trial (comparing standard-dose chemotherapy with high-dose therapy). In the standard-dose arm, patients with the variant allele (105Val) had an improved progression-free survival (PFS) (adjusted hazard ratios for PFS were 0.55 for heterozygotes and 0.52 for 105Val homozygotes, compared with 105Ile homozygotes; P for trend = .04); this was supported by a trend to improved overall survival, greater likelihood of entering plateau and shorter time to reach plateau in patients with the 105Val allele. No difference in outcome by genotype was found for patients treated with high-dose therapy. However, the progression-free survival advantage of the high-dose arm was seen only in patients homozygous for 105Ile (P = .008). (Blood. 2003;102:2345-2350)


Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 4525-4525
Author(s):  
Omar Aljitawi ◽  
Siddhartha Ganguly ◽  
Sunil Abhyankar ◽  
J. Daniel Robinson ◽  
J, D. Pipkin ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 4525 High dose therapy and autologous transplantation is considered a standard of care procedure in symptomatic, transplant eligible multiple myeloma patients. The chemotherapy of choice in this situation is high dose melphalan. The later has marginal solubility and limited chemical stability upon reconstitution and dilution. The marginal stability of this compound has limited the use of regimens utilizing higher absolute dosages and/or longer infusions (> 60 minutes) that could potentially lead to improved outcomes. Accordingly, co-solvents are used in the marketed formulation, which are believed to contribute to the side effects of the therapy. A co-solvent used in Alkeran for Injection is propylene glycol, which has been reported to cause renal dysfunction, arrhythmias, hyperosmolality, increased anion gap metabolic acidosis, and sepsis-like syndrome. On the other hand, Melphalan HCl for Injection (Propylene Glycol-Free), a reformulation of Alkeran for Injection, incorporates the Captisol® brand of β-cyclodextrin sulfobutyl ethers, sodium salts (also known as [SBE]7m-β-CD) into a freeze-dried product developed by CyDex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (CyDex). Captisol improves stability allowing for potentially longer infusion times. Study Design/Goals: In this phase IIa, open-label, randomized, cross-over design, the PK of Melphalan HCl for Injection (Propylene Glycol-Free) and Alkeran for Injection are assessed in the same MM patients undergoing transplantation. Furthermore, the rates of myeloablation and subsequent engraftment are determined, and any difference in expected safety and tolerability due to high-dose Melphalan HCl for Injection (Propylene Glycol-Free) is assessed in transplanted patients. Results: Seven patients of the planned 24 patients have already enrolled in the study at the University of Kansas Medical Center. All patients achieved myeloablation followed by successful engraftment. Median time to myeloablation, defined as number of days from the start of chemotherapy until absolute neutrophil count dropped below 500/Ul, was 6.4 days (range 5–7 days). Median time to neutrophil engraftment, defined as first day of three consecutive days where ANC was higher than 500/Ul following their nadir, was day +9. Beside expected grade 2–3 toxicities related to high dose melphalan, no additional toxicities were reported. In specific, no renal insufficiency was noted. Preliminary PK analysis has been performed on five patients. Preliminiary parameter estimates (Mean± SEM) are presented in the Table. The mean bioavailability was 113%. The mean half-lifes for the Melphalan HCl for Injection (Propylene Glycol-Free) and Alkeran for Injection were 70 and 75 min. Following Melphalan HCL for Injection (PropyleneGlycol-Free) and Alkeran for Injection, the distribution volumes were 0.23 and 0.35 L/kg and clearances were 0.29 and 0.34 L/hr per kg, respectively. Conclusion: Melphalan HCl for Injection (Propylene Glycol-Free), administered as half of a high-dose conditioning regimen, appears to result in successful myeloablation and subsequent engraftment at no extra-toxicity, and trending toward higher bio-availability compared to Alkeran. Future studies that are designed to expose patients exclusively to the propylene glycol-free formulation will delineate potential safety and efficacy advantages over the current therapy.ProductN=Cmax (μ g/mL)t½α(min)t½ β(min)Vc (L)Vdss (L)AUC (μ g* min/mL)CL (mL/min)Melphalan HCl for Injection55.5 ± 2.112.9 ± 2.769.6 ± 2.825.5 ± 11.042.0 ± 15.4424 ± 146529 ± 187Alkeran54.4 ± 2.624.2 ± 19.774.8 ± 14.039.3 ± 25.752.3 ± 22.1375 ± 167631 ± 209 Disclosures: Aljitawi: CyDex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Melphalan use in high dose therapy and autologous transplantation. Robinson:CyDex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy. Pipkin:CyDex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 204062072110129
Author(s):  
Songyi Park ◽  
Dong-Yeop Shin ◽  
Junshik Hong ◽  
Inho Kim ◽  
Youngil Koh ◽  
...  

Background: High dose melphalan (HDMEL) is considered the standard conditioning regimen for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in multiple myeloma (MM) patients. Recent studies showed superiority of busulfan plus melphalan (BUMEL) compared to HDMEL as a conditioning regimen. We compared the efficacy of HDMEL and BUMEL in newly diagnosed Asian MM patients, who are often underrepresented. Methods: This is a single-center, retrospective study including MM patients who underwent ASCT after bortezomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone (VTD) triplet induction chemotherapy between January 2015 and August 2019. Result: In the end, 79 patients in the HDMEL group were compared to 31 patients in the BUMEL group. There were no differences between the two groups with regards to sex, age at ASCT, risk group, and stage. The HDMEL group showed better response to pre-transplant VTD compared to BUMEL, but after ASCT the BUMEL group showed better overall response. In terms of progression-free survival (PFS), although BUMEL showed trends towards better PFS regardless of pre-transplant status and age, the difference did not reach statistical significance. The BUMEL group more often experienced mucositis related to chemotherapy, but there was no difference between the two groups with regards to hospitalization days, cell engraftment, and infection rates. Conclusion: BUMEL conditioning deserves attention as the alternative option to HDMEL for newly diagnosed MM patients, even in the era of triplet induction chemotherapy. Specifically, patients achieving very good partial response (VGPR) or better response with triplet induction chemotherapy might benefit the most from BUMEL conditioning. Tailored conditioning regimen, based on patient’s response to induction chemotherapy and co-morbidities, can lead to better treatment outcomes.


2004 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 235-239 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Kumar ◽  
M A Gertz ◽  
A Dispenzieri ◽  
M Q Lacy ◽  
L A Wellik ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document