scholarly journals First report of phase 2 study of dasatinib with hyper-CVAD for the frontline treatment of patients with Philadelphia chromosome–positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (12) ◽  
pp. 2070-2077 ◽  
Author(s):  
Farhad Ravandi ◽  
Susan O'Brien ◽  
Deborah Thomas ◽  
Stefan Faderl ◽  
Dan Jones ◽  
...  

AbstractThe combination of cytotoxic chemotherapy and imatinib has improved the outcome for patients with Philadelphia chromosome–positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Dasatinib has significant clinical activity in patients with imatinib resistance. We examined the efficacy and safety of combining chemotherapy with dasatinib for patients with Ph+ ALL. Newly diagnosed patients received dasatinib 50 mg by mouth twice per day (or 100 mg daily) for the first 14 days of each of 8 cycles of alternating hyper-CVAD, and high-dose cytarabine and methotrexate. Patients in complete remission received maintenance daily dasatinib and monthly vincristine and prednisone for 2 years, followed by dasatinib indefinitely. Thirty-five patients with untreated Ph+ ALL with a median age of 53 years (range, 21-79 years) were treated; 33 patients (94%) achieved complete remission. Two patients died of infections before response assessment. Grade 3 and 4 adverse events included hemorrhage and pleural and pericardial effusions. With a median follow-up of 14 months (range, 4-37 months), the median disease-free survival and median overall survival have not been reached, with an estimated 2-year survival of 64%. The combination of chemotherapy with dasatinib is effective in achieving long-term remissions in patients with newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL. This study was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT00390793.

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 354-354
Author(s):  
Yuan kong ◽  
Ying-Jun Chang ◽  
Yan-rong Liu ◽  
Ya-zhe Wang ◽  
Qian Jiang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The prognosis of Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ALL) has been greatly improved in the modern era of imatinib. Nevertheless, relapse is still a major cause of treatment failure in human Ph+ALL. Leukemia-initiating cells (LICs) are presumed to be responsible for relapse in leukemia. Therefore, we conducted a study to identify the candidate LICs that are responsible for disease progression and its clinical significance in patients with Ph+ALL. Aims To investigate the leukemia-initiating and self-renewal capacities of CD34+CD38-CD58- cells and determine the prognostic significance of CD34+CD38-CD58- phenotype in patients with Ph+ALL treated in Peking University Institute of Hematology. Methods The leukemia-initiating potential and self-renewal capacity of the sorted CD34+CD38-CD58-, CD34+CD38-CD58+,CD34+CD38+CD58- and CD34+CD38+CD58+ compartments were investigated in vivo using sublethally irradiated and anti-mouse CD122 monoclonal antibody conditioned NOD/SCID mice by intra-bone marrow–injection. Furthermore, we prospectively analyzed whether the identified CD34+CD38-CD58- compartment at diagnosis correlates with minimal residual disease (MRD) after therapy and clinical outcomes in 63 adult patients (18-60 years) with de novo Ph+ALL. Results Xenotransplantation of the sorted CD34+CD38-CD58- cells led to a repopulation of human B-ALL in primary and secondary recipient mice, which were phenotypically and clonally derived from the original Ph+ALL patients analyzed by flow cytometry, as well as quantitative real-time RT-PCR and fluorescence in situ hybridization for leukemia-specific cytogenetic abnormalities. Furthermore, the candidate CD34+CD38-CD58- LICs phenotype at diagnosis (n=16) significantly correlated with a lower complete remission rate and higher MRD frequency monitored by BCR-ABL mRNA levels in BM of Ph+ALL patients. Additionally, it directly correlated with higher cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR, 60% ± 1.97% vs. 15.51% ± 0.30%, P=0.002) and unfavorable disease-free survival (DFS, 33.75%±12.64% vs. 71.31%±7.17%, P=0.009) at 3-year. The CD34+CD38-CD58- group exhibited a higher rate of BCR-ABL mutations conferring higher level imatinib resistance than the other group (43.75% vs. 17.02%, P=0.04). Multivariate analyses revealed that CD34+CD38-CD58- phenotype at diagnosis was an independent risk factor for relapse (HR=4.35, P=0.009) and DFS (HR=3.38, P=0.008) in adult Ph+ALL. Summary/Conclusion Both the xenotransplantation data as well as the clinical correlation studies show that CD34+CD38-CD58- compartment enrich for leukemia-initiating cells in adult Ph+ALL. CD34+CD38-CD58- phenotype at diagnosis independently correlates with an adverse prognosis, which promises to be an efficient tool for relapse prediction and risk-stratification treatment in adult Ph+ALL patients. Acknowledgments This work was supported by grants from National Natural Science Foundation of China (grants no. 30800483&81230013) and Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Program (grant no.Z111107067311070). Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 2814-2814 ◽  
Author(s):  
Farhad Ravandi ◽  
Deborah Thomas ◽  
Hagop Kantarjian ◽  
Stefan Faderl ◽  
Charles Koller ◽  
...  

Abstract Combination of cytotoxic chemotherapy with imatinib has improved the outcome for patients with Ph+ ALL and resulted in eradication of minimal residual disease and durable remissions without allogeneic stem cell transplant in some patients (Thomas D, Blood, 2004; Yanada M, JCO, 2006; Wassmann B, Blood, 2006; de Labarthe A, Blood, 2007). The dual Src and Abl inhibitor dasatinib has a significantly higher in vitro kinase inhibition against BCR-ABL and has demonstrated potent clinical activity in patients with imatinib-resistant lymphoid blast phase CML (CML-LB) and Ph+ ALL with over 50% complete cytogenetic responses (CG CR) in phase I and II trials but with median progression free survival of only 3 to 4 months. We are conducting a phase II trial in which patients with newly diagnosed or relapsed Ph+ ALL or CML-LB receive dasatinib 50 mg po bid for the first 14 days of each of 8 cycles of alternating hyperCVAD and high dose cytarabine and methotrexate. Patients in complete remission (CR) continue to receive maintenance dasatinib 50 mg po bid daily and vincristine and prednisone monthly for 2 years followed by dasatinib indefinitely. To date 15 newly diagnosed patients with Ph+ ALL (cohort I) and 4 patients with relapsed Ph+ ALL or CML-LB (cohort II) have received a median of 4 cycles (range 1 – 8); 4 patients are receiving maintenance in CR. Median age for cohort I is 55 years (range 23 – 79) and for cohort II, 43 years (range 26 – 69); 13 and 3 patients were older than 50 years, respectively. Median WBC at diagnosis for cohort I was 4.3 × 109/L (range, 0.8 – 203.4 x 109/L). Three patients had CNS involvement. Fourteen and 3 patients in the 2 cohorts are evaluable for response to induction; 2 are too early. Thirteen patients (93%) in cohort I and all evaluable patients in cohort II have achieved CR after the first cycle; 1 patient in cohort I died on day 20 from infections before response assessment; her bone marrow exam on day 14 showed no detectable disease. Ten of 11 (91%) patients in cohort I have achieved CG CR after 1 cycle; 3 are too early. Three of 4 patients in cohort II have achieved CG CR after 1 cycle; 1 had a new CG abnormality and 1 is too early. Six patients have achieved complete molecular remission after the first cycle with the lowest BCR-ABL/ABL in the other patients ranging from 0.01 to 1.91. Median time to neutrophil and platelet recovery for cohort I is 18 and 25 days and for cohort II 18.5 and 30.5 days. Grade 3 and 4 toxicity has included 7 episodes of GI bleeding as well as infections, diarrhea, hypophosphatemia, hypocalcemia, elevated transaminases, and acute renal failure unrelated to treatment. With a median follow up of 4 months (range, 0 – 10), 15 patients are alive and in CR; 1 died at induction, 1 died in CR from an unrelated cardiac event, and 2 are too early. No patient has relapsed and no patient has received an allogeneic transplant. We conclude that the combination of the hyperCVAD regimen with dasatinib is feasible and can achieve early molecular remissions in patients with Ph+ ALL and CML-LB.


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 1301-1301
Author(s):  
Bingcheng Liu ◽  
Ying Wang ◽  
Chunlin Zhou ◽  
Hui Wei ◽  
Dong Lin ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Imatinib combined with conventional chemotherapy has significantly improved the prognosis of adults with Philadelphia-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia ( Ph+ ALL ). Nilotinib, the second generation TKIs is approximately 30 fold more potent than imatinib and is active in vitro against multiple BCR/ABL mutations. Here, we report the efficacy and safety of nilotinib combined with multiple reagents chemotherapy in newly diagnosed patients with Ph+ ALL. Methods: Newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL patients aged 15 to 59 and with adequate organ function were recruited. The 4weeks induction cycle consist of vincristine, daunorubicin, cyclophosphamide and prednisone. After achieving hematological complete remission (HCR), patients received 2 years of consolidation and maintenance therapy. Consolidation therapy was including 7 courses of multiple drug chemotherapy or allogeneic/autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo/auto HCT). Nilotinib was the only drug for maintenance therapy. Nilotinib 400mg was given orally twice daily along with combination chemotherapy starting from day 15 of induction until the initiation of conditioning for transplantation, hematological relapse or continuing for 2 years since achievement of hematological complete remission (HCR).Central nervous system (CNS) prophylaxis was performed by intrathecally administering triple agents. The data cut-off day was June 1st 2015. HCR and molecular complete remission (MCR), overall survival(OS), hematologic relapse free survival (HRFS), toxicity, nilotinib concentration in serum and cerebrospinal fluid(CSF) were evaluated. MCR was defined as Bcr-Abl fusion gene becomes negative in bone marrow using quantitative RT-PCR. Results: A total of 30 patients (19 males and 11 females) were enrolled from September 2011 to November 2013. The median age was 40 (range 21-57) years old. The type of BCR breakpoint was minor in 24 patients, major in 2 patients and both in 4 patients. All the 30 patients (100%) and 8 patients (26.7%) achieved HCR and MCR respectively after the induction cycle. Cumulative MCR rate was 80%. 17 patients underwent HCT, 14 patients with alloHCT and 2 patients with autoHCT in first HCR, 1 patient received alloHCT after relapse. 9 patients died from leukemia relapse and 4 patients died post-alloHCT without relapse. The median HRFS and OS were 20.7 and 34 months respectively. The 4 year HRFS rate was 41% and the 4 year OS rate was 48%. The molecular response after induction has no impact on HRFS and OS. Patients achieving MCR had better HRFS (32 vs 8.9 months, p=0.006) but not OS(33.3vs 17.2months, p=0.068) than those patient without MCR. During induction, 23 patients experienced infectious fever including 2 patients with septicemia and 6 patients with pneumonia needing antifungal therapy. Intestinal obstruction occurred in 7 patients during induction and relived by interrupting nilotinib treatment. The incidence of non-hematologic adverse events (AE) over grade 3 during the study was 23% jaundice, 10% rash, 6.7% arthralgia and bone pain, 6.7%headache, 3.3% ALT elevation. No QTc prolongation over 500ms happened. Grade 2 tachycardia and premature ventricular contraction occurred in 2 patients and 1 patient respectively. During the high-dose methotrexate treatment cycle, delaying of methotrexate metabolism happened in 20 patients (66.7%), increasing creatine occurred in 8 patients (26.7%, grade 3 in 3 patients), 1 patient received haemodialysis. Nilotinib serum level reached to stable concentration after 15 days of administration. Only traces of nilotinib was detected in CSF. Conclusion: In this prospective study, combination of nilotinib and cytotoxic drug was shown to be effective and tolerable for adult Ph+ALL. Nilotinib could not penetrate the blood brain barrier. (ChiCTR-ONC-12002469) Disclosures Off Label Use: nilotinib,the 2nd generation TKI, was approved for CML. Wang:Novarits and Bristol-Mayers squibb. G.S.: Consultancy.


Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 109 (4) ◽  
pp. 1408-1413 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrienne de Labarthe ◽  
Philippe Rousselot ◽  
Françoise Huguet-Rigal ◽  
Eric Delabesse ◽  
Francis Witz ◽  
...  

AbstractThe combination of imatinib with chemotherapy has been recently reported as very promising in patients with Philadelphia chromosome–positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). During 2004 and 2005, 45 patients with newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL were treated in the Group for Research on Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (GRAAPH) 2003 study, in which imatinib was started with HAM (mitoxantrone with intermediate-dose cytarabine) consolidation in good early responders (corticosensitive and chemosensitive ALL) or earlier during the induction course in combination with dexamethasone and vincristine in poor early responders (corticoresistant and/or chemoresistant ALL). Imatinib was then continuously administered until stem cell transplantation (SCT). Overall, complete remission (CR) and BCR-ABL real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR) negativity rates were 96% and 29%, respectively. All of the 22 CR patients (100%) with a donor actually received allogeneic SCT in first CR. At 18 months, the estimated cumulative incidence of relapse, disease-free survival, and overall survival were 30%, 51%, and 65%, respectively. These 3 end points compared very favorably with results obtained in the pre-imatinib LALA-94 trial. This study confirms the value of the combined approach and encourages prospective trials to define the optimal chemotherapy that has to be combined with imatinib and to carefully reevaluate the place of allogeneic SCT in this new context.


Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1548-1548 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas J Short ◽  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Koji Sasaki ◽  
Farhad Ravandi ◽  
Jorge E. Cortes ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Kinase domain (KD) mutations in ABL1 are the dominant mechanism of relapse in patients (pts) with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL). Previous studies in Ph+ ALL have suggested that some pts harbor subclonal T315I mutations prior to tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment. However, nearly all reports have relied upon inherently error prone RT-PCR to generate template cDNA prior to mutation analysis. We hypothesized that conventional assays might over-estimate the incidence of pre-existing resistance mutations, and that improved sequencing accuracy might yield important information for risk stratification and TKI selection. Methods: Duplex sequencing (DS) is a molecular tagging method that improves the accuracy of conventional next-generation sequencing by more than 10,000-fold, by comparing the nucleotide sequences of each strand of double-stranded molecules. ABL1 DS was performed on genomic DNA from 64 pts with newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL treated with hyper-CVAD plus a TKI. DS of exons 4-10 of ABL1 was performed to an average molecular depth of >10,000x. Among pts who relapsed, using RNA extracted from relapse samples, the KD (codons 221 through 500) of the BCR-ABL1 fusion transcript was sequenced by the Sanger method using a nested PCR approach, with a detection limit of 10-20%. Results: The median age of the cohort was 54 years (range, 20-80 years). The TKI used was imatinib in 5 pts, dasatinib in 38 pts, and ponatinib in 21 pts. All pts achieved complete remission, and 12 pts (19%) underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation in first remission. A total of 115 pretreatment ABL1 KD mutations were detected among 47 pts (73%). The median number of pretreatment ABL1 KD mutations was 2 (range, 0-6 mutations). The median variant allelic frequency (VAF) of the detected somatic mutations was 0.008% (range, 0.004%-0.649%). Five mutations (4%) and 40 mutations (35%) were present at a VAF ≥0.1% and ≥0.01%, respectively. Eleven mutations known to confer resistance to at least one TKI were detected in 7 pts (11%), and included: F317L in 4 pts, E225K in 2 pts, and E225V, L384M, M244V, Q252H and T315I in 1 pt each. Five mutations were detected in ≥1 pretreatment sample (F317L in 4 pts, M244V in 3 pts, and E255K, E459K and V355V in 2 pts each). Of these 7 pts with pretreatment resistance mutations, 5 pts received a TKI known not to be sensitive to the mutation(s); 2 pts who received ponatinib had mutations at least intermediately sensitive to ponatinib (1 pt with F317L and 1 pt with both E255K and M244V mutations). With a median duration of follow-up of 54 months (range, 1-124 months), 18 pts have relapsed. None of the 7 pts with known pretreatment resistance mutations relapsed. There was no difference in the number of pretreatment mutations between pts who relapsed and those who did not (median mutations: 1 [range, 0-4] and 2 [range, 0-6], respectively; P=0.26). Of the 18 pts who relapsed, 14 underwent Sanger sequencing for ABL1 KD mutations at the time of relapse. Clonal resistance mutations were detected at relapse in 9 pts (64% of sequenced samples): T315I in 6 pts, and F317I, V229L and V338G in 1 pt each (all in pts treated with dasatinib, except V338G in pt on imatinib). Relapse mutations were not observed in pretreatment samples in any of the pts. Conclusions: DS identified very low level pretreatment ABL1 KD mutations in a majority of pts with newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL but these appear inconsequential. Ninety percent of mutations identified have not been described as resistance mutations, suggesting that they may be either synonymous or functionally neutral amino acid changes resulting from normal aging. There was no apparent association of these mutations and risk of relapse, even in the minority of cases in which known resistance mutations were detected at baseline. These data suggest that pretreatment testing for ABL1 KD mutations in Ph+ ALL is unlikely to affect treatment decisions. Disclosures Short: Takeda Oncology: Consultancy. Sasaki:Otsuka Pharmaceutical: Honoraria. Ravandi:Jazz: Honoraria; Orsenix: Honoraria; Orsenix: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Sunesis: Honoraria; Xencor: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Research Funding; Astellas Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Astellas Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Macrogenix: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz: Honoraria; Abbvie: Research Funding; Xencor: Research Funding; Macrogenix: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sunesis: Honoraria. Cortes:Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astellas Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Research Funding; Arog: Research Funding. Konopleva:Stemline Therapeutics: Research Funding. Radich:TwinStrand Biosciences: Research Funding. Jabbour:Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document