The Association between Transplant-Associated Thrombotic Microangiopathy and Calcineurin Inhibitor and Sirolimus Levels

Abstract Introduction: Thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) is a known complication of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). An ongoing debate is whether TMA is caused by acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) or calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)/sirolimus. Previous studies have not examined the impact of CNI/sirolimus average trough levels while accounting for the confounding effect of GVHD. In the current study, we examined the association between time-varying levels of CNI/sirolimus and the onset of TMA among 2105 adult allogeneic HCT recipients. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of allogeneic HCT recipients during 2006-2015 at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center who received CNI/sirolimus for GVHD prophylaxis. TMA (outcome) was ascertained and validated as previously described (Blood 130;Suppl:666). Acute GVHD (confounder) was defined and graded according to established criteria. Consecutive CNI/sirolimus trough levels (exposure) were obtained and interval values between checks were imputed via linear interpolation. We followed patients from the time of hematopoietic cell infusion until the onset of TMA and censored patients at day 100 or >1 week of missing drug levels. To examine the association between the "type" of immunosuppressant and TMA, CNI/sirolimus exposure over time was characterized as a discrete categorical variable (tacrolimus alone, cyclosporine alone, or sirolimus + CNI). To examine the impact of the "level" of immunosuppressant on TMA, CNI/sirolimus exposure was both defined as an average of the previous 7-day trough levels (continuous variable) as well as a discrete time-above-peak variable (binary variable for tacrolimus >15 ng/mL, cyclosporine >450 ng/mL, or sirolimus >10 ng/mL). Extended Cox regression models were built to examine the time-varying association between CNI/sirolimus exposures and TMA after adjusting for GVHD. Results: In the current study, 2105 adult allogeneic HCT recipients contributed 173,171 person-days and 150 cases of TMA. The median follow-up time was 94 days and trough blood levels were checked on average 3x per week. Initial GVHD prophylaxis regimen for patients included 54% on tacrolimus (n=1135), 40% on cyclosporine (n=837), and 6% on a combination of sirolimus + CNI (n=133). Nearly no one received sirolimus alone without CNI. Eight percent of patients (n=162) had at least one switch in the immunosuppression regimen within 100 days. The median (IQR) trough levels for tacrolimus, cyclosporine, and sirolimus were 9 ng/mL (7-12), 283 ng/mL (206-372), and 5 ng/mL (4-7), respectively. Acute GVHD developed in 64% of patients including 53% grade 2 (n=1115), 9% grade 3 (n=185), 2% grade 4 (n=52). In the analysis adjusted for both discrete time-varying CNI/sirolimus exposure and GVHD, higher grades of GVHD had strong associations with TMA (Table 1: grade 2 HR 2.24, P=0.001; grade 3 HR 12.38, P<0.001; grade 4 HR 26.04, P<0.001). While cyclosporine and tacrolimus had a similar risk for TMA (HR 1.23, P=0.230), sirolimus + CNI regimen was associated with a slightly higher risk compared to CNI alone (HR 1.76, P=0.051). In the analyses of individual drug levels adjusted by GVHD, higher trough levels of tacrolimus and cyclosporine (either as a linear average level or binary time-above-peak) were not associated with an increased risk of TMA (Table 2). However, higher sirolimus trough levels were associated with an appreciable risk of TMA (HR 1.44, P=0.001 for every 1 ng/mL increase in sirolimus average trough level; HR 3.23, P=0.164 for time above 10 ng/mL). Conclusion: In allogeneic HCT patients, acute GVHD was strongly associated with the onset of TMA independent of ongoing exposures of CNI/sirolimus. We did not find an association between CNI recipients (tacrolimus versus cyclosporine) or CNI levels and the risk of TMA. However, when combined with CNI, higher sirolimus trough levels were linearly associated with a higher risk for TMA. Limitations in this observational study include the inability to adjust for concomitant medications and conditions that might have altered drug levels and inability to adjust for target drug levels since recognized risk factors might have led clinicians to target higher drug levels due to higher risks of GVHD. These findings suggest that prevention and treatment of GVHD and avoidance of high sirolimus levels will decrease the risk of TMA. Disclosures Lee: Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Mallinckrodt: Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Onyx: Research Funding; Kadmon: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding. Garcia:Pfizer: Consultancy; Portola: Research Funding; Shingoi: Consultancy; Retham Technologies LLC: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol Meyers Squibb: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Safety and Efficacy of the mTOR Inhibitor Everolimus as Early Interventional Replacement for Calcineurin Inhibitors In Graft-Versus-Host Disease (GvHD) Prophylaxis After Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.2325.2325 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 2325-2325

Author(s):

Herbert G. Sayer ◽

Anne Klink ◽

Thomas Schenk ◽

Anne Treschl ◽

Kristina Schilling ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Research Funding ◽

Mtor Inhibitor ◽

Acute Gvhd ◽

Solid Organ Transplantation ◽

Immunosuppressive Drug ◽

Solid Organ ◽

Reduced Intensity Conditioning ◽

Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽

Grade Ii ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 2325 Background: The medical backbone of GvHD prophylaxis has been considered the use of a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) like cyclosporine or tacrolimus in combination with methotrexate (MTX) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor everolimus (RAD001, Certican®) is a novel immunosuppressive drug and beside sirolimus approved in solid organ transplantation. Recently, it was reported that mTOR-inhibitors in combination with CNI showed promising clinical effectiveness in innovative prevention strategies of acute GvHD after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT). In this single centre retrospective analysis, we report the outcome on patients (pts), treated interventional with everolimus due to severe toxicity induced by CNI-based GvHD prophylaxis. Patients and Methods: Ten pts (3 acute myeloid leukaemias, 1 myelodysplastic syndrome, 1 acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, 4 Non-Hodgkin-lymphomas) underwent allogeneic blood SCT between 7/2007 and 3/2010. The median age was 51 years [range: 24–64] with 6 pts in advanced stages of their disease. Myeloablative conditioning was used in 3 pts (12 G TBI/120mg/kg cyclophosphamide (cyclo)] and reduced-intensity conditioning in 7 pts [5× treosulfan/fludarabine (flu), 1× busulfan/flu and 1× amsacrine/cytarabine/flu followed by 4 G TBI/cyclo]. HLA-matched family donors in 4 pts and unrelated donors in 6 pts donated on day 0 a median of 4.73 × 106 kg per bodyweight CD-34 positive stem cells. GvHD-prophylaxis consisted of standard CNI+MTX in 3 pts, CNI+MMF in 6 pts and CNI+MMF+MTX in 1 patient. Antithymocyte globulin as in vivo T-cell depletion was given in 7 pts as part of the reduced intensity conditioning regime. Results: Everolimus (0.75 mg Certican ® twice a day orally) was individual started after a median of 14 days [range: 6–16] after SCT. Primary reasons for stopping CNI (median day +10 [range 1–15]) were nephrotoxicity (CTC ≥ grade 3) in 7 pts and neurotoxicity (CTC ≥ grade 3) in 3 pts. Two pts received steroids in addition to everolimus temporally, 5 pts MMF and 3 pts steroids+MMF. The intended plasma therapeutic level of everolimus was 3–8 mg/l. All patients showed neutrophil engraftment on median day +18 [range: 8–20] and platelet engraftment on day +21 [range: 10–88]. Acute GvHD ≥ grade II (Glucksberg/Consensus NHI) occurred in 3pts (30%) (2× grade II, 1× grade III) or IBMTR-Index-Score ≥ B (2×B, 1×C). Chronic GvHD limited disease score grade I (Consensus NIH) was observed in 3 pts (n=1 overlap syndrome and n=2 de-novo cGvHD). Two out of 7 high risk pts for CMV reactivation developed viral activation. Until day +100 3 pts stopped interventional GvHD prophylaxis due to oral bleeding on day +46 (n=1) and assumed TMA on day +57/+64 (n=2). The period of everolimus administration was 140 days on average [range: 19–509]. As per August 2010 6 pts are alive resulting in a median cumulative overall survival of 58%. ALL-relapse had to be observed on day +312 in one patient. Fatal casualties occurred on day +19 by multiorgan failure (MOD), on day +103 by pneumonia, on day +211 by questionable pulmonary embolism and on day+ 411 by MOD and limited cGvHD. Conclusions: A delayed CNI-free GvHD-prevention strategy with the m-TOR inhibitor everolimus is feasible and efficacious in a series of patients after allogeneic SCT. The manageable toxicity profile in our cohort with pre-existing organ dysfunction at treatment onset mandates further evaluation of everolimus after SCT. A prospective multicentre phase II trial of everolimus as intended early replacement for CNI after SCT with a focus on tolerability is scheduled to start soon. Disclosures: Sayer: Novartis Pharma: Honoraria, Research Funding. Off Label Use: Everolimus -Certican (R)- is only approved as a immunosuppressive drug in solid organ transplantation. Hochhaus: Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Thiotepa-Fludarabine-Treosulfan (TFT) Conditioning for 2nd Allogeneic Peripheral Blood Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (HCT) from a Second Unrelated Donor in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Relapsed after Prior Allogeneic HCT: A Prospective Multicenter Phase II Trial

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-118999 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 210-210

Author(s):

Jürgen Finke ◽

Claudia Schmoor ◽

Matthias Stelljes ◽

Andreas Burchert ◽

Peter Dreger ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Primary Endpoint ◽

Research Funding ◽

Acute Gvhd ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Conditioning Regimen ◽

Unrelated Donor ◽

Allogeneic Hct ◽

Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽

Secondary Endpoints ◽

Full Analysis

Abstract Introduction: Relapse of AML after allogeneic HCT has a dismal prognosis. Long-term survival after 2nd allogeneic HCT has been described in selected patients. Here we tested a specific protocol with a fixed drug combination for myeloablative conditioning and GvHD prophylaxis for 2nd allogeneic HCT from a different unrelated donor. (EudraCT no.: 2012-005414-18, German Clinical Trials Registry no.: DRKS00005126) Methods : Aim of the trial was to show efficacy and safety of a 2nd alloHCT from an unrelated donor after a uniform conditioning with Treosulfan 3x12gm/m2, Fludarabin 3x30mg/m2, and Thiotepa 3x 5mg/kg (TFT), and GvHD prophylaxis with cyclosporine A (CyA) /Mycophenolate and ATG-F (Neovii) 3x10mg/kg. Eligible were adult patients with AML, ECOG ≤ 2, with sensitive or refractory hematologic relapse (≥ 20% blasts) > 6 months after a prior allogeneic HCT , including secondary (s) and/ or tAML. CR prior 2nd HCT was no prerequisite. The primary endpoint of the study was disease-free survival (DFS) defined as being alive and free of disease at 1 year post 2nd HCT. Secondary endpoints were relapse, relapse mortality (RM), NRM, overall survival (OS), acute GvHD, chronic GvHD, engraftment, and adverse events. According to the Fleming one-stage design, 50 evaluable patients had to be included. If 16 or more patients were alive and free of disease at 1 year post 2nd SCT, the regimen could be considered as successful for evaluation in further trials. With this decision rule, it can be shown at one-sided α=0.1 that the probability of DFS at 1 year post 2nd HCT is higher than 23% with a power of 90%, when it is at least 40%. This is a first analysis of the study covering the first year after 2nd HCT of each patient. The analysis is based on the full analysis set, which includes all patients, for whom the conditioning regimen TFT and the GvHD prophylaxis regimen CyA, MPA/MMF, ATG-F has started, and for whom allogeneic HCT from an unrelated donor has been performed. Results: Fifty-two patients were registered for the study from 25th March 2014 up to 10th March 2017 from 9 German centres. The full analysis set includes 50 patients (median age 53.5 years). ECOG was median 1. Donors for 1st allo HCT had been related (n=11 (22.0%)) or unrelated (n=39 (78.0%)) (n=48 PBSCT, n=2 bone marrow). Conditioning for 1st HCT was myeloablative in 23 (46.0%) patients. After 1st HCT, the rate of acute GvHD I-IV was 34.0%, and of chronic GvHD was 40.0%. Median time from 1st HCT to relapse was 17.2 months and from relapse after 1st HCT to 2nd HCT 2.5 months. Thirty-six (72%) patients had received induction chemotherapy for relapse prior to 2nd HCT, 11 (22.0%) patients had received azacytidine or decitabine, and 11 (22.0%) had received donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI). Remission status prior to 2nd HCT was complete remission in 16 (32.0%) patients, chemo-refractory relapse in 33 (66.0%), one patient was in partial remission. With regard to the primary endpoint, 23 (46%, 95%-CI (31.8-60.7%) of the patients were alive and free of relapse at 1 year after 2nd SCT. With regard to the secondary endpoints at 1 year, the cumulative incidence of relapse (95%-CI) was 26 (17-42)%, 9/50 patients (18 (10-33)%) died after relapse of AML, NRM was 14/50 patients (28 (18-44)%, cause: infection n=6, infection after aGvHD n=6, PTLD n=2), OS was 54 (39-66)%. Four patients are alive after relapse. aGvHD rate was 54 (42-70)%, aGvHD III-IV 26 (16-42)%, cGvHD 26 (16-42)%, extensive cGvHD 20 (12-35)%, engraftment rate with ANC > 1.0 x 103/µl was 92 (85-100)%, with platelets > 20 x 103/µl was 80 (70-92)%, and with platelets > 100 x 103/µl was 66 (54-81)%. After 1 year, 4 patients had received DLI for prophylaxis, and 5 patients for mixed chimerism as per protocol. Conclusion: Second alloHCT with an ablative double alkylator containing conditioning regimen with Thiotepa, Fludarabine, and Treosulfan is feasible and can result in sustained disease control in patients with AML relapse after a first alloHCT, and therefore seems to be a valid option in this otherwise detrimental setting. Disclosures Finke: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel grants, Research Funding; Riemser: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Neovii: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel grants, Research Funding; Medac: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel grants, Research Funding. Stelljes:Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; MSD: Consultancy; Novartis: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; JAZZ: Honoraria. Burchert:Novartis: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; AOP Orphan: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria. Schub:Affimed: Research Funding. Kobbe:Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Travel Support, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Secondary Graft-Versus-Host Disease (GVHD) Prophylaxis with Oral Proteasome Inhibitor Ixazomib Is Associated with Low Incidence of Recurrent, Late Acute and Chronic GVHD and Facilitated Calcineurin Inhibitor Taper within the First Year Post Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-139666 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 41-42

Author(s):

Natasia Rodriguez ◽

Jasme Lee ◽

Lisa Flynn ◽

Fiona Murray ◽

Sean Devlin ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Calcineurin Inhibitor ◽

Acute Gvhd ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Overlap Syndrome ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽

Grade Ii ◽

Low Incidence

Background. GVHD is a frequent complication within the 1st year after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT). Recipients of reduced intensity (RI) and non-myeloablative (NMA) conditioning combined with calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based GVHD prophylaxis, frequently develop GVHD in the context of immunosuppression taper. Ixazomib is an oral proteasome inhibitor (PI) that has demonstrated immunomodulatory properties, inhibition of pro-inflammatory cytokines, anti-tumor activity, and has a wide safety profile. We hypothesized that secondary GVHD prophylaxis using ixazomib, will facilitate CNI taper without increase in GVHD frequency and severity, maintaining graft-versus-tumor (GVT) effect, and a safety profile. Methods. We conducted an open label, prospective, single-center pilot study between 11/16 and 03/19. Eligible patients were > 18 yrs old, had a hematologic malignancy treated with RI or NMA conditioning allo-HCT, received CNI-based GVHD prophylaxis, and were within day 100 to 150 post-HCT. Patients with active acute and/or chronic GVHD were excluded. Patients were treated with ixazomib 4 mg orally once weekly, each cycle consisting of 3 weeks on and 1 week off therapy, until completion of taper from prophylactic CNI or 1-year post-HCT was reached, whichever occurred first. Patients who developed grade II-IV acute GVHD, chronic GVHD, or died of transplant-related mortality (TRM) were deemed treatment failure. The primary endpoint was the efficacy of ixazomib for the prevention of recurrent or late grade II-IV acute GVHD or chronic GVHD at 1-year post-HCT. Additional endpoints included TRM, relapse rate, survival analysis, safety evaluation, and immune reconstitution. Results. A total of 18 patients (median age of 58 yrs) were accrued in the study. The majority were male, had a diagnosis of NHL, and received RI conditioning (Table 1). All patients had a PBSC graft, and 16 (89%) were 10/10 HLA-matched. The median time for initiation of ixazomib was 141.5 days post-HCT. Fourteen patients had no GVHD during the study period. The 4 patients who developed GVHD had severe overlap syndrome (n = 2), mild de novo chronic GVHD (n = 1), and recurrent grade II acute GVHD (n = 1). Notably, patients with severe overlap syndrome had limited chronic GVHD involvement affecting the mouth and/or eyes, and the severity score was driven by acute manifestations affecting the skin and GI tract. Six patients successfully discontinued CNI and 4 patients were tapering immunosuppression close to the end of study at 1-year post-HCT. The cumulative incidence (CI) of grade II-IV acute and chronic GVHD at 1-year post-HCT was 25% (95%CI: 7.2-48.1) (Fig. 1A). No patients died during the study and therefore, the CI of TRM at 1-year was 0%, and only 1 patient had malignant relapse (NHL). The CI of PFS and the composite endpoint GVHD-free/relapse-free survival (GRFS) at 1-year were 83% (95%CI: 58-100) and 73% (95%CI: 49-100, Fig 1B), respectively. All patients experienced at least 1 TEAE of any grade. Most AEs were grade 1 or 2, with the most common being cytopenia and elevation in ALT/AST. Drug-related SAEs were reported in 9 patients and included neutrophil and decreased WBC. Seven patients required ixazomib dose reduction due to side effects, and 5 patients were removed from the study due to toxicity (1 neutropenia, 3 GI, 1 skin rash). Of those, 1 had subsequent GVHD by day 365 post-HCT. Immune recovery at 3, 6 and 12 months post-HCT was evaluated. There was a rapid and sustained recovery in T-cell subpopulations and B cell reconstitution Fig 2. Conclusions. Secondary GVHD prophylaxis with ixazomib was associated with low incidence of recurrent and late acute and chronic GVHD within the 1st year post-HCT. This approach allowed CNI taper while preserving GVT effect without aggravating GVHD. No deaths occurred during the study period and the 1-year GRFS was high. Ixazomib was overall well tolerated and favored immune reconstitution post-HCT. Our findings support further development of this approach and provide a proof-of-concept for secondary GVHD prophylaxis. Disclosures Dahi: Kite: Consultancy. Giralt:TAKEDA: Research Funding; JAZZ: Consultancy, Honoraria; CELGENE: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AMGEN: Consultancy, Research Funding; MILTENYI: Consultancy, Research Funding; KITE: Consultancy; NOVARTIS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; OMEROS: Consultancy, Honoraria; ACTINUUM: Consultancy, Research Funding. Sauter:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy; Gamida Cell: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite - a Gilead Company: Consultancy; Precision Biosciences: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genmab: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Spectrum Pharamaceuticals: Consultancy; Sanofi-Genzyme: Consultancy, Research Funding; Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Perales:Omeros: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Medigene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other; NexImmune: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other; Cidara Therapeutics: Other; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Nektar Therapeutics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria; Miltenyi Biotec: Research Funding; Kite/Gilead: Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MolMed: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria; Bellicum: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ponce:Ceramedix: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Generon: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kadmon: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Early Lenalidomide Maintenance to Prevent Relapse of High-Risk MDS and AML Patients with Del(5q) Following Allogeneic HCT - Results of the “LENAMAINT” Trial

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.3060.3060 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 3060-3060 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Katja Sockel ◽

Jochen Greiner ◽

Rudolf Trenschel ◽

Christian Unzicker ◽

Guido Kobbe ◽

...

Keyword(s):

T Cell ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Research Funding ◽

Acute Gvhd ◽

T Cell Responses ◽

Hematopoietic Stem ◽

Cytogenetic Abnormalities ◽

Allogeneic Hct ◽

Cell Responses ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 3060 Background: Chromosome 5 abnormalities in patients (pts) with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or advanced myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) are mostly associated with a poor outcome. Although allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) is the treatment approach with the highest curative potential, early relapse rates following HCT are still considerably high. Since therapeutic options in these pts are often limited, the prevention of relapse represents a major challenge. Lenalidomide (LEN) has been successfully used in MDS pts with del(5q) cytogenetic abnormalities. Besides a direct anti-proliferative effect on del(5q) progenitors, its immunmodulatory function might also enhance T-or NK cell mediated GVL effects. Therefore it could be an effective maintenance drug to prevent relapse after allogeneic HCT in pts with MDS or AML and del(5q) abnormalities. Methods: We report results of a prospective multicenter phase II clinical trial evaluating the efficacy to prevent relapse as well as safety of LEN maintenance following HCT in pts with MDS or AML and cytogenetic abnormalities including del(5q). Only pts achieving a complete hematological remission (CR) after HCT were eligible. In the absence of toxicity or relapse pts could receive up to 12 cycles of LEN maintenance at a dose of 10 mg/day orally, for 21 days, with 7 days rest (28 day cycle). Results: Ten pts with either MDS (n=1, RAEB-1) or AML (n=9) with a median age of 65 years (range 40–72) were included. The disease status prior to allogeneic HCT were CR in 4 pts, relapse/refractory disease in 3 pts, unknown in 2 pts while the MDS pt had not received any prior therapy. A complex aberrant karyotype including del(5q) was documented in 5 pts. Two pts had an additional cytogenetic abnormality besides del(5q) and 3 pts displayed single del(5q). While three pts underwent allogeneic HCT from a matched sibling donor, four pts were transplanted from a matched unrelated and three from a mismatched unrelated donor (single allele or antigen mismatch). Conditioning was of reduced intensity and was followed by the infusion of peripheral blood stem cells in all pts. LEN maintenance therapy was started after complete hematopoietic recovery with documented complete remission at a median of 2.5 months (range 2–4 months) following HCT. After a median of 4 cycles 8 of 10 pts (80%) had to discontinue LEN treatment due to relapse (n=4), development of severe GvHD grade 2–4 (n=2) or other adverse events (n=2). Altogether, 6 of 10 pts (60%) developed severe acute GvHD grade 3–4 within the first 2 cycles of LEN maintenance. All pts were still under systemic immunosuppression at the time of GvHD appearance. Other common adverse events were gastrointestinal side effects (nausea) and myelotoxicity. Reversible neutropenia grade 3/4 was documented in 3 of 10 (30%) of the pts while thrombocytopenia grade 3/4 occurred in 4 of 10 (40%) of them. During the treatment course specific T cell responses against different tumor/leukemia-associated antigens (TAAs/LAAs) using ELISpot analysis for Interferon alpha and granzyme B were measured. Sufficient T cells before and during LEN treatment were only available in one pt, who showed an increase of specific T cell responses against the TAAs/LAAs. With a median follow-up of 254 days (range 32–677) from the start of LEN maintenance, 5 of 10 pts (50%) are currently alive with four pts in continuous CR since the time of HCT. The study was stopped prematurely because of suspected induction of GVHD by LEN. Conclusions: Early LEN maintenance to prevent relapse following HCT in pts with MDS or AML and del(5q) may be associated with the induction of severe acute GVHD. Disclosures: Kobbe: Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ortho Biotec: Consultancy. Germing:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding. Bornhaeuser:Celgene: Honoraria. Platzbecker:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Comparison of Haploidentical Donor Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Using Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide to Matched-Sibling, Matched-Unrelated, Mismatched-Unrelated, and Umbilical Cord Blood Donor Transplantation in Adults with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A CIBMTR Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-137186 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 50-51

Author(s):

Matthew J. Wieduwilt ◽

Leland Metheny ◽

Mei-Jie Zhang ◽

Hai-Lin Wang ◽

Noel Estrada-Merly ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Research Funding ◽

Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Unrelated Donor ◽

Research Support ◽

Allogeneic Hct ◽

Sibling Donor ◽

Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽

Matched Sibling ◽

Grade 3

Background The relative benefits of haploidentical HCT using PTCy compared to traditional matched-sibling donor, traditional unrelated donor and umbilical cord blood (UCB) allogeneic HCT for adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is still being defined. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) database comparing post-HCT outcomes of haploidentical donors with PTCy to HLA-identical sibling donors, 8/8 HLA-MUDs, 7/8 HLA-MUDs, and UCB. Outcomes were overall survival (OS) leukemia-free survival (LFS), relapse, non-relapse mortality (NRM), grade 2-4 and grade 3-4 acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD), and chronic GVHD (cGVHD). Eligible patients were adults with ALL in complete remission (CR1, CR2, or CR3) undergoing first allogeneic HCT from 2013 to 2017. Key exclusion included not receiving PTCy for haploidentical HCT and ex vivo T-cell depleted or CD34-selected grafts. Cox proportional hazards multivariable regression analysis was used to compare the treatment groups. Results 4201 patients were studied: 393 haploidentical donor (92 centers), 1627 HLA-identical sibling donor (206 centers), 1646 8/8 HLA-MUD (181 centers), 230 7/8 HLA-MUD (90 centers), and 305 UCB (79 centers). Groups were well matched, however, notable differences between included race, time from diagnosis to HCT (CR1 only), conditioning regimen intensity, donor age, graft source for non-cord (peripheral blood or bone marrow), GVHD prophylaxis modality, and the use of in vivo T-cell depletion. Compared to other groups, haploidentical HCT had the lowest percentage of non-Hispanic white patients (43% vs. 49-74%), was more likely to use reduced-intensity conditioning (42% vs 17-25%), and was more likely to use bone marrow (41% vs. 14-29%). In multivariate analysis comparing haploidentical to matched-sibling donor HCT, no differences were observed in OS, LFS, NRM, relapse, or aGVHD. Compared to haploidentical HCT, the risk of cGVHD was significantly higher with matched-sibling donor HCT (D/R sex match F/M, HR 2.59, P<0.001, D/R sex match, other, HR 1.37, P=0.003). Comparing haploidentical to 8/8 HLA-MUD HCT, no differences were seen in OS, LFS, relapse, or Grade 2-4 aGVHD but 8/8 HLA-MUD HCT was associated with increased incidences of NRM (HR 1.42, P=0.02), grade 3-4 aGVHD (HR 1.59, P=0.005), and cGVHD (HR D/R sex match F/M, HR 2.91, P<0.001, D/R sex match, other, HR 1.38, P=0.001). Comparing haploidentical to 7/8 HLA-MUD HCT, no differences were seen in LFS or relapse but 7/8 HLA-MUD HCT was associated with worse OS (HR 1.38, P=0.01) and increased incidences of NRM (HR 2.13, P=<0.001), grade 2-4 aGVHD (HR 1.33, P=0.04) , grade 3-4 aGVHD (HR 1.86, P=0.003), and cGVHD (HR 1.72, P=<0.001). Comparing haploidentical to UCB HCT, no differences were seen in late OS (>18 months), late LFS, relapse, or cGVHD. Compared to haploidentical HCT, UCB HCT was associated with worse early OS (≤18 months, HR 1.93, P<0.001), worse early LFS (HR 1.40, P=0.007) and increased incidences of NRM (HR 2.08, P<0.001), grade 2-4 aGVHD (HR 1.83, P<0.001), and grade 3-4 aGVHD (HR 1.97, P<0.001). Similar outcomes were observed in sensitivity analyses restricting cohorts to (1) MA conditioning with peripheral blood stem cells and (2) calcineurin inhibitor-based GVHD prophylaxis for matched-sibling, unrelated donor, and UCB HCT. Conclusions For OS and LFS, haploidentical HCT using PTCy for adult ALL was superior to traditional HCT using 7/8 HLA-MUDs and UCB but equivalent to traditional HCT using matched-sibling donors and 8/8 HLA-MUDs. Results were consistent across all subgroups. Haploidentical HCT had a lower incidence of aGVHD compared to 8/8 HLA-MUD, 7/8 HLA-MUD, and UCB HCT and a lower incidence of cGVHD compared to matched-sibling donor, 8/8 HLA-MUD, and 7/8 HLA-MUD HCT. Based on these data, haploidentical HCT with PTCy results in similar survival with less GVHD compared to traditional matched-sibling and 8/8 HLA-matched donor HCT and is the superior alternative donor option for adult patients with ALL needing allogeneic HCT in CR. Figure Disclosures Wieduwilt: Leadiant: Research Funding; Shire: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Macrogeneics: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. de Lima:Incyte: Other: Personal Fees, advisory board; BMS: Other: Personal Fees, advisory board; Pfizer: Other: Personal fees, advisory board, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Kadmon: Other: Personal Fees, Advisory board. Kebriaei:Novartis: Other: Served on advisory board; Pfizer: Other: Served on advisory board; Kite: Other: Served on advisory board; Ziopharm: Other: Research Support; Amgen: Other: Research Support; Jazz: Consultancy. Hourigan:Merck: Other: Research Support (CRADA); Sellas: Other: Research Support (CRADA). Weisdorf:FATE Therapeutics: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Reduced Intensity Conditioning Combined with Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide for Graft Vs. Host Disease Prophylaxis In Older-Aged or Medically Frail Patients with Advanced Hematological Malignancies

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.2341.2341 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 2341-2341

Author(s):

Amin M Alousi ◽

Borje S. Andersson ◽

Rima M. Saliba ◽

Wendeline Botnick ◽

Gabriela Rondon ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Calcineurin Inhibitor ◽

Acute Gvhd ◽

Phase Ii Trial ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Reduced Intensity Conditioning ◽

Post Transplant ◽

Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽

Graft Vs Host Disease ◽

Matched Sibling ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 2341 Graft-vs-Host Disease (GVHD) remains a common complication following matched sibling and unrelated (MUD) donor hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT). Standard GVHD prophylaxis calls for prolonged immune suppression, typically with a calcineurin-inhibitor. Recently, post-transplant cyclophosphamide (Cy) has been studied as sole prophylaxis in matched related and unrelated bone marrow (BM) transplant recipients following an ablative conditioning regimen with busulfan (Bu) and Cy. Herein, we report the results of a phase II trial exploring a reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimen combined with post-transplant Cy in BM and peripheral blood (PB) HCT recipients. Methods: Fludarabine (Flu) was administered at a dose of 40mg/m2 over 1hr followed by intravenous Bu over 3 hrs targeting a daily AUC of 4,000 microMol-min on days −6 to −3. Recipients of MUD's received ATG on days −3 to −1 (total dose 4mg/kg). Cy was given as sole GVHD prophylaxis at a dose of 50mg/kg on days +3 and +4. Results: 31 pts with a median age of 62 yrs (range, 39–71) received a matched sibling (n=11) or unrelated donor (n=20) graft from BM (n=22) or PB (n=9) for the following diagnoses: AML/ MDS (n=25), CLL+MDS (n=2), CLL (n=1), NHL+MDS (n=1), NHL (n=1) and ALL (n=1). Disease status at the time of HCT was induction failure, relapsed and/ or chemotherapy-refractory disease in 23 pts with the remaining pts in high-risk CR1 (n=5), CR2 (n=2) or CR3 (n=1). The median co-morbidity score was 3 (range, 0–7) and 7 pts had a prior HCT (autologous n=4, allogeneic n=3). Median days to ANC > 0.5 × 109/L and platelet count >20 × 109/L were 17 (range, 13–38) and 24 (range, 11–57), respectively. Primary and secondary graft failure occurred in 1 and 2 pts, respectively. Mucositis (grade 2: n=19, grade 3: n=4) and hemorrhagic cystitis (grade 2: n=10, grade 3: n=4, grade 4: n=2) were the most common toxicities. Day 100 non-relapse mortality was 6% (95% CI, 2–25). The cumulative incidence (C.I.) of acute GVHD grades II-IV and III-IV was 56% (95% CI, 40–79) and 13% (95% CI, 5–33) which includes 4 cases of late acute GVHD. Rates of acute GVHD did not differ between PB or BM recipients (55% vs. 58%, p-value 0.9). C.I. of chronic GVHD was 11% (95% CI, 4–32). With a median follow-up of 10 months (range, 4–20), 1-yr overall and progression-free survival (PFS) was 56% (95% CI, 35–73) and 43% (95% CI, 21–63), respectively. For pts with AML/MDS, 1- yr PFS for pts in CR1, any CR and relapsed/refractory disease were: 100%, 66% (95% CI, 16–91) and 40% (95% CI, 20–60), respectively. Conclusion: This phase II trial of RIC with BU/Flu combined with post-transplant Cy was well tolerated and resulted in favorable survival and good disease-control in this high-risk, older-age population. Rates for acute GVHD appear comparable to historical rates with calcineurin-inhibitor based regimens, while rates for chronic GVHD appear to be lower. Rates for acute GVHD were similar for PB and BM grafts supporting the inclusion of PB grafts in future trials using post-transplant Cy as the basis for the GVHD prophylaxis regimen. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Influence of Age on Risk for Acute and Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease in Children Receiving HLA Identical Sibling Bone Marrow Transplantation

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.2228.2228 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 2228-2228 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Muna Qayed ◽

John Horan ◽

Stephen R. Spellman ◽

Mukta Arora ◽

Tao Wang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cumulative Incidence ◽

Marrow Transplantation ◽

Lower Risk ◽

Acute Gvhd ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Incidence Estimate ◽

Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽

Recipient Age ◽

Grade 3 ◽

The Impact

Abstract Introduction: In adult HLA matched sibling donor (MSD) hematopoietic cell transplantation, both recipient and donor age have been shown to be a risk factors for graft versus host disease (GVHD). While it is widely recognized that pediatric patients are at lower risk for GVHD than adults, the importance of age within the pediatric age group in MSD transplantation has not been examined. We, therefore, assessed the impact of age on GVHD risk after MSD bone marrow transplantation (BMT) in 477 pediatric patients with acute leukemia. Methods: This is a Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplantation registry study. Patients younger than 18 years with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in 1st or 2nd complete remission (CR), who received myeloablative conditioining, T cell-replete HLA MSD BMT and calcineurin inhibitor based GVHD prophylaxis between 2000-2013 were included. Patients who received a lymphocyte depleting antibody were excluded. Because donor and recipient ages were highly correlated, their effects could not be independently assessed. We, therefore, assessed only recipient age. Results: The transplants were drawn from 101 centers. The median age of the recipients was 10.1 years. 21% had ALL in 1st CR, 24% ALL in 2nd CR, 47% AML in 1st CR and 8% AML in 2nd CR. 73% received cyclosporine and Methotrexate for GVHD prophylaxis. In a preliminary model, using grade 3-4 acute GVHD as the endpoint, we identified two cut points, 2 years and 13 years using the likelihood ratio test. In all final models, three age groups were used to define recipient age: < 2 years (n=60), 2 to 12.99 (n=255) years and 13-17.99 years (n=162). The cumulative incidence of grade 2-4 acute GVHD at 100 days post-transplant was 19% (95% confidence interval, CI, 16-23%); 24% (95% CI 14-35%), 13% (95% CI 9-18%) and 28% (95% CI 21-35%) for recipients <2 years, 2-12.99 years, and 13-17.99 years of age, respectively (p-value=0.001). For grade 3-4 acute GVHD, the cumulative incidence estimate at 100 days was 8% (95% CI 3-17%), 3% (95% CI 1-6%) and 14% (95% CI 9-20%) (p <0.001) and the cumulative incidence estimate for chronic GVHD at 1 year was 15% (95% CI 7-25%), 10% (95% CI 7-14%) and 27% (95% CI 20-34%) (p <0.001) for recipients <2 years, 2-12.99 years, and 13-17.99 years of age, respectively (Figures 1-3). In the multivariate analyses, using age 13-17.99 as the baseline and .01 as the threshold for significance, age 2-12.99 years (HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.26-0.71, p=0.001), but not age < 2 years (HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.3-1.18, p=0.14), was associated with a lower risk for grade 2-4 acute GVHD (after adjustment for GVHD prophylaxis, performance score and year of transplant). For grade 3-4 acute GVHD, again age 2-12.99 years (HR 0.24, 95% CI 0.1-0.56, p=0.001), but not age < 2 years (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.29-1.94, p=0.55), was associated with a lower risk, after adjustment for year of transplant. For chronic GVHD (after adjustment for donor-recipient birth order, and GVHD prophylaxis), age 2-12.99 years (HR 0.32, 95% CI 0.19-0.54, p<0.001) was associated with lower risk; the effect was similar in age < 2 years, but did not reach significance (HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.16-0.82, p=0.016). Year of transplant had a strong effect on acute, but not chronic GVHD. Its effect did not appear to be mediated by changes in GVHD prophylaxis. Using 2000-2004 as the baseline, the HR for grade 2-4 acute GVHD was 0.38 (95% CI 0.20-0.64, p=0.0006) and 0.28 (95% CI 0.13-0.59, p=0.0008) for 2005-2008 and 2009-2013, respectively. For grade 3-4 acute GVHD, they were 0.23 (95% CI 0.08-0.65, p=0.0057) and 0.23 (95% CI 0.07-0.78, p=0.0183) for these periods, respectively. There was no difference in overall survival, leukemia-free survival or transplant related mortality between the age groups. Conclusion: Our results indicate that children 2-12.99 years have a lower risk for acute and chronic GVHD than those 13 years and older. Children less than 2 years may also have a reduced risk for chronic GVHD, but this possibility needs to be re-examined in a larger sample. It is plausible that pubertal changes underlie the rise in risk for GVHD during adolescence. An important limitation of our study was that we were unable to examine the impact of donor age because of the strong correlation between donor and recipient age. A study with a larger sample is also needed to further investigate this matter. Figure 1 Figure 1. Figure 2 Figure 2. Figure 3 Figure 3. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Allogeneic Blood or Marrow Transplantation (BMT) with Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide (PTCy) Based Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD) Prophylaxis for Myelodysplastic Syndrome/ Myeloproliferative Neoplasm-Overlap Syndromes (MDS/MPN)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-138671 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 40-40

Author(s):

Theodoros Karantanos ◽

Hua-Ling Tsai ◽

Lukasz P. Gondek ◽

Mark Levis ◽

Margaret M. Showel ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Outcomes ◽

Cumulative Incidence ◽

Research Funding ◽

Acute Gvhd ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Univariate Analysis ◽

Kaplan Meier ◽

Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Myelomonocytic Leukemia

INTRODUCTION: MDS/MPN are a group of clonal hematopoietic disorders with overlapping features of MDS and MPN, and include chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), atypical chronic myeloid leukemia (aCML), MDS/MPN-unclassifiable along with juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia and MDS/MPN with ring sideroblast and thrombocytosis. Therapeutic options for MDS/MPN remain limited and BMT remains the only modality with curative potential. However, the overall survival of these patients following BMT remains poor marked by a high incidence of non-relapse mortality (NRM) and relapse. Moreover, most of the published cohorts consisted of patients receiving matched related donor grafts, with limited data on the outcomes of patients receiving grafts from alternative donors. In the current study, we aim to describe outcomes of BMT for MDS/MPN using PTCy as the GVHD prophylaxis platform and primarily haploidentical related (haplo) donors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with MDS/MPN who underwent BMT with PTCy at Johns Hopkins between 1/2011-1/2019. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to evaluate overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), and GVHD/relapse-free survival (GRFS). Cumulative incidence of relapse and non-relapse mortality (NRM) were estimated non-parametrically in presence of competing events where NRM was a competing event of relapse, and vice versa. Univariate analysis was used to evaluate the impact of donor type, HCT-CI, and karyotype on these clinical outcomes via Cox proportional hazard models for OS/RFS/GRFS, and Fine-Gray's sub-distribution (s) hazard models for relapse/NRM/GVHD. RESULTS: Thirty-four consecutive patients (11 women and 23 men) with a median age of 63 years (range 51-74) at the time of BMT were identified. Of these, 21 (61.8%) had haplo donors and 31 (91%) received non-myeloablative conditioning with fludarabine, cyclophosphamide and total body irradiation. Median follow up was 3.9 years (range: 24 days - 8.4 years) based on reverse Kaplan-Meier approach. Other patient, disease and BMT related details are shown in Table 1. Time to neutrophil and platelet recovery was 22 days (range 19 - 28 days) and 31 days (range 22 - 67 days), respectively. Two (6%) patients had primary graft failure, both had received a marrow graft. At 3-years, probability of OS was 46% (95% CI: 31% - 68%), 3 RFS was 30% (17% - 51%), GRFS was 26% (14%-48%), cumulative incidence of relapse was 59% (95% CI: 41% - 77%) and incidence of NRM was 12% (95% CI: 1% - 23%). The incidence of grade 2-4 acute GVHD at 1 year following HCT was 24% but no patients had grade 3-4 acute GVHD. The cumulative incidence of any chronic GVHD at 3 years was 20% with 3 (9%) patients requiring systemic therapy. Univariate analysis showed that HCT-CI score at the time of HSCT was associated with higher incidence of relapse (sHR 5.22, 95% CI 2.26-12.08) and inferior RFS (HR 3.09, 95% CI 1.16-8.2). Other patient-, disease- and HCT-related factors were not statistically significantly associated with these clinical outcomes. The outcomes of patients with haplo donors (n=21) were also estimated at 3 years and estimates of OS were 56% (95% CI 38% - 82%), RFS 42% (95% CI 26% - 70%), GRFS 37% (21% - 66%), cumulative incidence of relapse 43% (95% CI 21% - 66%), NRM 14% (95% CI 1% - 30%), chronic GVHD 21% (95% CI 2% - 40%). No patients developed grade 3-4 acute GVHD. While the sample size is limited, comparison of K-M estimates for RFS and relapse with haplo donor (n=21) and matched related/unrelated donor (n=12), is shown in Figure 1. CONCLUSIONS: We report, for the first time, clinical outcomes of BMT for MDS/MPN with the PTCy based GVHD platform, and outcomes appear comparable with those previously described in other retrospective studies using conventional approach. Although limited by sample size for a statistical analysis, the outcomes with haplo donor BMT appear promising. The relatively high incidence of relapse in these patients appears to be the major factor contributing adversely to outcomes, while NRM and GVHD incidence with our non-myeloablative conditioning PTCy platform are low. We are currently exploring strategies to decrease relapse rates to further improve BMT outcomes in these patients. Disclosures Levis: Amgen: Honoraria; FujiFilm: Honoraria, Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Honoraria; Menarini: Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria, Research Funding. DeZern:MEI: Consultancy; Astex: Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Gojo:BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Amphivena: Research Funding. Jain:Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; CareDx: Other: Advisory Board; Bristol Myer Squibb: Other: for advisory board participation.

Download Full-text

A Composite Event-Free Survival End Point to Evaluate Outcome after Allogeneic Transplantation for Severe Aplastic Anemia: A Study on Behalf of the Francophone Society of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (SFGM-TC)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.2674.2674 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 2674-2674

Author(s):

Raynier Devillier ◽

Hélène Labussière-Wallet ◽

Laurence Clément ◽

Ibrahim Yakoubagha ◽

Jacques-Olivier Bay ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Research Funding ◽

Graft Failure ◽

Acute Gvhd ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Allogeneic Transplantation ◽

Free Survival ◽

Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Background: Optimization of transplantation modalities (Graft versus host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis, conditioning regimens, high level HLA typing and supportive care) has improved overall survival (OS) of patients (pts) with idiopathic severe aplastic anemia (SAA) undergoing matched related (MRD) or 10/10 unrelated donor (MUD) allogeneic transplantation (HSCT). OS is nowadays of more than 80% and thus may not be sufficient anymore to accurately assess outcome. New composite endpoints including surrogate markers of quality of life, such as GVHD, may fit better our current practice. GVHD and relapse free survival (GRFS) have recently been reported in the context of hematological malignancies, as a surrogate marker of quality of survival (Holtan et al. blood 2014). However, this end point was not evaluated in the setting of SAA, with no need of GVT effect, but more concern regarding engraftment. Thus, we adapted from Holtan et al. a composite GRFS with the aim to provide more accurate evaluation of outcome after HSCT for SAA. Methods: We analyzed adult pts undergoing first HSCT for SAA from a MRD or 10/10 MUD between 2004 and 2013 (Clinical data obtained throughProMISe [Project Manager Internet Server], an internet-based system shared by SFGM-TC centers). Informed consent was obtained in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Relevant events for GRFS were death, graft failure/loss, grade 3 to 4 acute GVHD and severe chronic GVHD, according to which one occurred first. We analyzed GRFS according to donor type. Moreover, prediction by dynamiclandmarkingwas used for continual reassessment of GRFS within the next 2 years following subsequent landmark times from 0 to 3 years after HSCT. Results: 188 pts (MRD, n=142; MUD n=46) with a median age of 30 years (18-67) were analyzed. After a median follow-up of 52 months (3-159), 2-year GRFS were 75% and 54% in pts receiving MRD and MUD HSCT, respectively (p=0.006, Figure 1A). In Causes of GRFS failure in MRD vs. MUD were grade 3-4 acute GVHD (5% vs 20%, p=0.002), extensive chronic GVHD (3% vs 4%, p=0.902), graft failure/loss (10% vs 4%, p=0.236) and death before the previous events (7% vs 18%, p=0.057). The use of peripheral blood graft (PBSC) was associated with lower 2-GRFS compared to bone marrow (51% vs 74%, p=0.004). Multivariate Cox model showed that MUD (p<0.001), age (continuous variable, p=0.001) were associated with worse GRFS, with a significant interaction between these both variables (interaction p-value: 0.008, Figure 1B). PBSC as graft source (p=0.096) and positive donor and/or recipient CMVsero-status (p=0.095) tended to decrease GRFS. Although the pts in the MUD group initially have worse overall GRFS, prediction by dynamiclandmarkingshowed that after 6 months post HSCT, they recovered the same GRFS as those transplanted with MRD. Indeed, the probabilities to stay event-free within 2 years following the 6-month landmark time was 89% and 86% in the MRD and MUD groups, respectively (Figure 2). Conclusion: GRFS after MRD HSCT is very good, with 75% of pts who did not present any events, supporting upfront HSCT for young patients with available MRD. In contrast, the higher incidence of acute GVHD (20% vs. 5%) after MUD significantly decreased GRFS compared to MRD. However, MUD pts surviving the early 6 months without may reach similar GRFS than pts transplanted with MRD. Taken together, these results suggest that although overall GRFS is good with low incidence of late events, early events such as acute GVHD remains a major cause of GRFS failure. This supports that the early post HSCT period remains a critical phase for the future good quality survival, underlining the importance of graft source choice as well as the need of GVHD prophylaxis improvement. Figure 1 Figure 1. Figure 2 Figure 2. Disclosures Peffault de Latour: Amgen: Research Funding; Alexion: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

A Calcineurin Inhibitor Free Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD) Prophylaxis for Patients Undergoing Matched Related (MRD) and Matched Unrelated Donor (MUD) Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant (Allo-HCT)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-151845 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 3893-3893

Author(s):

Madiha Iqbal ◽

Felipe Andres Mendieta Nieto ◽

Kaitlyn M Brannick ◽

Zhuo Li ◽

Hemant S. Murthy ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Median Time ◽

Research Funding ◽

Calcineurin Inhibitor ◽

Acute Gvhd ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽

Grade Ii ◽

Matched Donor

Abstract Introduction Post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) and calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) based GVHD prophylaxis has shown lower rates of acute and chronic GVHD when compared with the traditional prophylaxis of calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) and methotrexate (MTX) in matched donor (related and unrelated) allo-HCT. The combination of PTCy with sirolimus as a calcineurin inhibitor-free GVHD prophylaxis has shown promising results with cumulative rates of grade II-IV acute and chronic GVHD in the range of 15-27% and 20-27% respectively in patients undergoing matched and haploidentical allo-HCT. We report a single center, nonrandomized comparison of patients undergoing matched donor allo-HCT receiving PTCy in combination with sirolimus (PTCy/Siro) with those receiving the standard GVHD prophylaxis of tacrolimus and MTX (Tac/MTX). Methods One hundred and sixteen consecutive patients who had undergone a MRD or MUD allo-HCT between January 2018 to January 2021 and received either PTCy with sirolimus or tacrolimus with methotrexate as GVHD prophylaxis regimens were eligible for inclusion. The selection of PTCy with sirolimus or tacrolimus with methotrexate as GVHD prophylaxis regimen was based on physician choice. Primary endpoints were cumulative incidence of acute (grade II to IV) and chronic GVHD. Secondary endpoints were a) neutrophil and platelet engraftment; b) overall survival (OS); c) non-relapse mortality (NRM); d) relapse; e) clinical infections and f) time to immunosuppression (IS) withdrawal. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate 1-year and 2-year freedom from long term adverse events, including chronic GVHD, relapse, NRM and OS. All tests were two-sided with alpha level set at 0.05 for statistical significance. Results Out of a total of 116 patients undergoing MRD and MUD allo-HCT, 29 received PTCy/Siro and 87 Tac/MTX. Baseline characteristics were similar between the two arms except patients in PTCy/Siro were younger with median of 48 (range: 24-69) years vs. 61 (range: 20-73) years (p=0.004) in Tac/MTX. There was difference in primary indication for allo-HCT between the two arms with non-hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) being the most common in PTCy/Siro and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in the Tac/MTX group. Patients receiving PTCy/Siro had a significantly higher median CD3 day 100 chimerism at 100 (90-100) vs. 90 (40-100) % (<0.001) and a significantly shorter median time to IS withdrawal at 138 (37-312) vs 232(66-1120) days for patients receiving Tac/MTX. There was no difference between the two arms for length of hospital stay and time to neutrophil engraftment, but PTCy/Siro had a significantly longer median time for platelet engraftment at 17.5 (12-74) vs.14 (11-38) days (p= 0.001). No significant difference was observed between the two arms for incidence of grade II to IV acute GVHD, grade III to IV acute GVHD, steroid refractory acute GVHD or clinical infections (Table 1). After a median follow up of 1.1 (range: 0-1.8) years, patients receiving PTCy/Siro were significantly less likely to have chronic GVHD with 2-year freedom from GVHD of 75% (95%CI: 58-98%) vs 20% (95%CI 10-40%), p=0.005 (Figure 1). There was no difference between the two arms for OS, disease relapse or non-relapse mortality (Table 2). Conclusion In this study, the combination of PTCy/Siro is associated with a significantly lower risk of chronic GVHD when compared against the traditional GVHD prophylaxis of CNI and methotrexate, despite significantly earlier IS withdrawal. Other long-term outcomes of interest remained comparable between the two arms. Chronic GVHD contributes to significant morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing allo-HCT. Newer strategies to limit the impact of chronic GVHD are needed. The results of our study warrant validation in a large, multicenter, randomized prospective trial. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Murthy: CRISPR Therapeutics: Research Funding. Foran: gamida: Honoraria; takeda: Research Funding; novartis: Honoraria; trillium: Research Funding; boehringer ingelheim: Research Funding; OncLive: Honoraria; abbvie: Research Funding; certara: Honoraria; sanofi aventis: Honoraria; syros: Honoraria; taiho: Honoraria; revolution medicine: Honoraria; bms: Honoraria; servier: Honoraria; pfizer: Honoraria; actinium: Research Funding; aptose: Research Funding; kura: Research Funding; h3bioscience: Research Funding; aprea: Research Funding; sellas: Research Funding; stemline: Research Funding.

Download Full-text