scholarly journals Ruxopeg, a Multi-Center Bayesian Phase 1/2 Adaptive Randomized Trial of the Combination of Ruxolitinib and Pegylated Interferon Alpha 2a in Patients with Myeloproliferative Neoplasm (MPN)-Associated Myelofibrosis

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 581-581 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Jacques Kiladjian ◽  
Juliette Soret-Dulphy ◽  
Matthieu Resche-Rigon ◽  
Francoise Boyer-Perrard ◽  
Fiorenza Barraco ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Interferon Alpha ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Disease Assessment ◽  
Spleen Size ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Allele Burden ◽  
Dose Combination

Abstract Background MPN-associated myelofibrosis (MF) is a condition characterized by splenomegaly, anemia, bone marrow (BM) fibrosis and debilitating symptoms. About 80% of patients (pts) harbor a driver mutations in JAK2, CALR or MPL genes that can be used as biomarkers for minimal residual disease assessment. Ruxolitinib (Rux) is a JAK inhibitor approved in intermediate or high risk (HR) MF to improve symptoms and splenomegaly but with little impact on the malignant clone and fibrosis. Interferon alpha (IFNa) can reduce mutant allele burden and fibrosis but is often poorly tolerated in highly symptomatic pts. The RUXOPEG study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of the combination of Rux + IFNa in MF (NCT02742324). Methods RUXOPEG is a multi-center Bayesian Phase 1/2 adaptive trial. Phase 1 includes up to 9 cohorts of 3 pts with increasing doses of both drugs. Tested doses of Rux and IFNa are 10, 15 and 20 mg BID, and 45, 90 and 135 mcg/week, respectively. Phase 2 will randomize between the 2 best dose combinations selected from phase 1. Primary objective: identify the most efficacious dose combination that also satisfies safety requirements. Primary tolerance criterion is the occurrence of dose limiting toxicities (DLT) within 45 days; primary efficacy criterion is >50% reduction in spleen length within 6 months. Secondary objectives include molecular response, reduction of BM fibrosis, quality of life and symptoms evolution, event-free and overall survival. The planned total enrollment is 42 pts. Key inclusion criteria are: diagnosis of MF (WHO criteria), intermediate or HR (IPSS), need of active therapy, presence of a driver mutation. Key exclusion criteria: prior treatment (or contra-indication) with Rux or IFNa, eligibility for stem cell transplantation, inadequate liver, cardiac or renal function, autoimmune disease, history of depression. Enrolment in 5 cohorts was completed in June 2018, and the last cohort for phase 1 will be opened in August. This abstract reports the current available data for the 5 cohorts who have completed the primary endpoint, but the presentation will provide the detailed analysis of primary and secondary endpoints of phase 1, which will be available in October 2018. Results Among the 15 pts currently enrolled in phase 1, 6 were females, mean age was 60.9 years (range: 38-72), 8 had primary MF, 5 post ET and 2 post PV MF. Median spleen size was 6 cm (range 0 - 18) by palpation and 18 cm (range 10-25) by imaging. Mean (range) blood counts were: hemoglobin 12 g/dL (8.5 - 13.8), WBC 18.3 G/L (8 - 35.5), platelets 457 G/L (157 - 906) and 6 pts had circulating blasts. 12 pts had JAK2V617F and 2 had CALR mutations; karytotype was normal in 9 pts, abnormal in 5 (very HR in 3). In 10 pts analyzed by NGS so far, 8 had additional mutations (1 in 5 pts, 3 in 1, and 4 in 2) in TET2 (n= 5), ASXL1 (4), DNMT3A (2), TP53 (2), SF3B1 (1) and SRSF2 (1) genes. Safety: No DLT was observed in the 5 cohorts (primary safety criterion), the highest tested dose combination being Rux 15 mg BID + IFNa 135 mcg/week. The last cohort will test Rux 20 mg BID + IFNa 135 mcg/week. 4 serious adverse events have been reported: 1 AML transformation (very HR cytogenetics, 3% circulating blasts at baseline), 1 thrombotic event, 1 squamous cell carcinoma and 1 aggravation of Raynaud's phenomenon. Efficacy: preliminary data show a clear decrease in spleen size at 6 months (median 0 cm by palpation, range 0-9; 12.1 cm by imaging, range 10-21) and improvement in blood counts (mean, range): hemoglobin 10.5 g/dL (9.7 - 12.5), WBC 8.6 G/L (5.4 - 11.1), platelets 267 G/L (80 - 486). According to IWG criteria, all the 10 pts evaluable at time of abstract preparation responded (3 partial response, 7 hematological improvement). JAK2V617F allele burden decreased from a mean of 75% (range 43- 96) at baseline to 46% (range 24 - 84) at 6 months. Encouraging results were also found in a patient with 5 mutations (figure1) with a clear decrease in JAK2V617F, ASXL1, DNMT3A and EZH2 mutations after 12 months of treatment. Conclusion RUXOPEG is the first study to formally assess the safety and efficacy of Rux + IFNa combination in MF patients never exposed to either drugs before. The first 5 dose combinations tested showed no DLT, confirming that this combination was generally well tolerated. Preliminary efficacy results are encouraging, including in patients who received very low doses of both drugs. Full results of the 6 cohorts tested in phase 1 and doses selected for phase 2 will be presented. Disclosures Kiladjian: Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AOP Orphan: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Giraudier:Novartis: Research Funding. Cassinat:Novartis: Research Funding; AOP Orphan: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Phase 1/2 Study of NS-018, an Oral JAK2 Inhibitor, in Patients with Primary Myelofibrosis (PMF), Post-Polycythemia Vera Myelofibrosis (postPV MF), or Post-Essential Thrombocythemia Myelofibrosis (postET MF)

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 1936-1936 ◽  
Author(s):  
Srdan Verstovsek ◽  
Moshe Talpaz ◽  
Ellen K. Ritchie ◽  
Martha Wadleigh ◽  
Olatoyosi Odenike ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Symptom Assessment ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Spleen Size ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Jak2 Inhibitor ◽  
Inhibitor Treatment

Abstract Background: NS-018 is an oral, selective, small molecule inhibitor of Janus kinase 2 (JAK2).In the previously-reported Phase 1 portion, patients with myelofibrosis (MF) who received NS-018 achieved steady-state plasma levels above the IC50 for JAK2 at all doses (75mg QD - 400 mg BID). 300 mg QD was chosen as the recommended dose (RD) for Phase 2 portion of the study. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the safety, tolerability and efficacy of orally-administered NS-018 in patients with PMF, post-PV MF, or post-ET MF. METHODS: This multicenter, Phase 1/2, 3+3 dose-escalation study of NS-018 enrolled patients with IPSS intermediate-1, intermediate-2, or high risk PMF, post-PV MF, or post-ET MF. NS-018 was dosed orally daily (QD) or twice daily (BID) in 28-day cycles. In Phase 1, changes in spleen size were assessed by manual palpation, quality of life with the Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MF-SAF), and responses according to the IWG-MRT/ELN consensus criteria. Bone marrow fibrosis was evaluated by biopsy, according to standard practice at the sites. Changes from baseline in grade of BM fibrosis were categorized as improvement, stabilization, or worsening. The Phase 1 portion of the study is complete. In the ongoing Phase 2 portion, spleen size is being assessed by palpation and by centrally-read MRI, and quality of life evaluated by the Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form (MPN-SAF). RESULTS: 48 patients were enrolled across 10 dosing cohorts (75-400 mg QD/100-400 mg BID) in Phase 1. Patient characteristics: 37 PMF, 5 post-PV MF, 6 post-ET MF; median age (range) 69.5 yrs (38-83); M/F:29/19; 35 JAK2V617F+, and 23 previously treated with a different JAK2 inhibitor. The data cutoff for this analysis was June 30, 2016 (median follow-up time of 279.5 [range 5-1806] days from screening), at which time 10 patients remained on treatment. The median number of treatment cycles was 10 (1-65). Reasons for treatment discontinuation were disease progression (PD, n = 13), adverse events (AE, n = 8), physician consideration (n = 6), patient request (n = 4), and protocol non-compliance (n = 1). The 300 mg QD dose was selected as the phase 2 recommended dose (P2RD) in terms of tolerability and efficacy. For the 48 patients, reductions in MF-SAF score were observed for all symptoms after 3 cycles, including patients with priorJAK2 inhibitor treatment. Among 36 splenic-evaluable patients with baseline splenomegaly > 5 cm and treatment for > 1 cycle, 20 (56%) showed > 50% reduction in spleen size (confirmed for > 8 weeks in 16 patients), including 9/19 (47%) patients with prior JAK2 treatment. According to IWG criteria, 14/36 (39%) patients showed splenic clinical improvement for > 8 weeks, 4 with hemoglobin CI, and 1 with platelet CI. Twenty-nine patients with prior JAK inhibitor treatment have been enrolled into the phase 2 portion of the trial. Patient characteristics: 13 PMF, 12 post-PV MF, 4 post-ET MF; median age (range) 67 yrs (48-86). The reason for discontinuation of prior JAK2 inhibitor treatment: AEs (62%) and PD (38%). To date, the median number of treatment cycles is 6 (1-20). The majority of grade 3/4 AEs were hematologic and the most common hematologic toxicities were anemia (21%) and thrombocytopenia (17%). Non-hematologic AEs were mostly grade 1/2, and the other AEs shown in > 10% of patients was nausea (14%). Updated Phase 2 efficacy and safety data will be presented at the meeting. CONCLUSIONS: The RP2D dose of NS-018 was 300 mg QD. This dose provided a durable dosing schedule, an acceptable safety profile, splenic size reductions and clinical symptom improvement. Phase 2 is ongoing and includes patients previously treated with a different JAK2 inhibitor. Disclosures Talpaz: Novartis: Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Other: Travel expense reimbursement, Research Funding; Ariad: Other: Expense reimbursement, travel accomodation expenses, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Other: travel accomodation expenses, Research Funding. Ritchie:Pfizer: Honoraria; Arian: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria; Incyte: Speakers Bureau. Odenike:Suneisis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CTI/Baxter: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Geron: Research Funding; Spectrum: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Algeta: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi-Aventis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Jamieson:GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; CTI Biopharma: Research Funding; Johnson & Johnson: Research Funding. Stein:Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Mesa:CTI: Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Galena: Consultancy; Ariad: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy.

Preliminary Results of a Phase 2 Study of PD 0332991 in Combination with Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 2940-2940
Author(s):  
Ruben Niesvizky ◽  
Luciano J Costa ◽  
Nisreen A. Haideri ◽  
Georg Hess ◽  
Seema Singhal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Oncology Research ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
D 20 ◽  
Ecog Ps

Abstract Abstract 2940 Background: PD 0332991 is an orally bioavailable selective inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6. Inhibition of CDK4/6 phosphorylation of retinoblastoma (Rb) induces prolonged early G1 cell cycle arrest (pG1) and synchronous progression to S phase (pG1-S) upon withdrawal, which sensitizes human multiple myeloma (MM) cells to killing by bortezomib (B) or dexamethasone (D) in vitro and in animal models. Based on these observations, a phase 1/2 study in combination with B plus D in patients (pts) with relapsed and/or refractory MM was initiated. The phase 1 part of the study (completed) determined the recommended phase 2 dose and schedule to be PD 0332991 100 mg QD 12 days on followed by 9 days off treatment in a 21-day cycle with intravenous B 1.0 mg/m2 plus oral D 20 mg administered on Days 8 and 11 in pG1 and 15 and 18 in pG1-S (Niesvizky et al. ASH 2010). We present preliminary data from the phase 2 part of the study. Methods: Pts with Rb protein-positive, measurable (as defined by International Myeloma Working Group [IMWG]) progressive, relapsed or refractory MM after ≥1 prior treatment were eligible. Prior B was allowed only if there was a response and disease progression occurred off therapy. Pts received oral PD 0332991 once daily on Days 1–12 in a 21-day cycle in combination with intravenous B 1.0 mg/m2 plus oral D 20 mg administered on Days 8, 11, 15, and 18. The primary endpoint is overall response rate (ORR); secondary endpoints include time to progression (TTP), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, duration of response, and safety. PD 0332991-mediated inhibition of CDK4/6-specific phosphorylation of Rb (pSRb) and Ki67 in bone marrow MM cells were also assessed. The phase 2 part of the study is a Simon Two-Stage Minimax design; 25 response evaluable patients were to be enrolled into the first stage. Results: 39 pts have been tested for Rb and 36 pts (92%) were positive. Of the 36 pts, 30 pts have been enrolled to date including 2 pts who did not receive the study treatment, and 23 pts are considered response evaluable as of the data cut-off. 56% of pts had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of 1 and 8% had ECOG PS of 2. At baseline, median β2 microglobulin was 3.1 (range 1.6–26.2), median hemoglobin was 11.2 (7.2–13.6), median calcium was 9.4 (8.7–11.9). The median number of prior therapies was 2 (range 1–8); 55% had received prior B. Sixteen pts have discontinued (9 due to progressive disease, 3 due to AE, 2 consent withdrawal, and 2 not treated). The most common treatment-related AEs were thrombocytopenia (44%), nausea (20%), anemia, constipation, fatigue, and neutropenia (all 16%); 32% of pts reported grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia. IHC data showed on-treatment reduction in pSRb and Ki67 in MM cells from bone marrow of 3/3 patients with available samples. To date, 1 pt achieved a complete response (CR), 1 achieved a very good partial response (VGPR), 1 partial response (PR), 1 minor response (MR), and 5 stable disease (SD); 6 pts are too early for assessment. Conclusions: To date, the combination of PD 0332991 and B plus D has shown response in 4 pts with relapsed/refractory MM. The most commonly reported AEs were cytopenias, consistent with the known safety profiles of PD 0332991 and B. PD 0332991 inhibited phosphorylation of Rb and cell cycle progression in MM cells. The accrual to stage 1 is ongoing. Updated efficacy and safety data will be presented. Disclosures: Niesvizky: Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hess:Pfizer Oncology: Consultancy; Pfizer Oncology: Research Funding; Pfizer Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Spicka:Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Celgene: Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Jakubczak:Pfizer Oncology: Employment; Pfizer Oncology: Equity Ownership. Kim:Pfizer Oncology: Equity Ownership; Pfizer Oncology: Employment. Randolph:Pfizer Oncology: Employment; Pfizer Oncology: Equity Ownership. Chen-Kiang:Pfizer Oncology: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Phase 1 Results of Anti-PD-Ligand 1 (Durvalumab) & Lenalidomide in Patients with Cutaneous T Cell Lymphoma and Correlation with Programmed Death Ligand 1 Expression and Gene Expression Profile

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 4024-4024
Author(s):  
Christiane Querfeld ◽  
Xiwei Wu ◽  
Tracy Stiller ◽  
Joycelynne Palmer ◽  
James F Sanchez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
T Cells ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Gene Expression Profile ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Expression Profile ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Advisory Committees

Background: T cells in CTCL are functionally exhausted and are characterized by the expression of immune inhibitory molecules such as PD1 and PD-L1 (Cancer Immunol Res 6; 2018). These findings justify the evaluation of immune checkpoint inhibition to reverse T cell exhaustion in CTCL. We initiated a phase 1/2 clinical trial of lenalidomide and durvalumab to determine the safety and efficacy of this regimen. Durvalumab is a human monoclonal antibody with high affinity and selectivity for PD-L1, targeting exhausted T cells and distinct cells within their environment. Lenalidomide, an oral immunomodulatory drug (IMiD) and analog of thalidomide, has previously shown activity in CTCL (Blood 123; 2014). Durvalumab may restore an anti-tumor immune response, and the combination of durvalumab and lenalidomide may enhance immune checkpoint blockade-induced immune responses. Associations between immune checkpoints, gene expression profile and the clinical efficacy of durvalumab/lenalidomide combination were evaluated. The primary objectives were to determine the recommended phase 2 dose of lenalidomide in combination with durvalumab and safety with primary endpoint of toxicity (using CTCAE 4.03). Secondary end points included objective response rate (ORR) and median duration. Relationships between gene expression profile (GEP), PD-L1 expression, and antitumor activity were exploratory end points. Methods: A Phase 1 portion (NCT03011814) is ongoing to evaluate the safety and tolerability of the durvalumab and lenalidomide combination. Pts are enrolled in sequential cohorts to receive durvalumab (fixed dose at 1500 mg) and dose escalation of lenalidomide (dose level 1 = 10 mg for all cycles; dose level 2 = 10 mg for cycle 1, 15 mg for all subsequent cycles; dose level 3 =10 mg for cycle 1, 15 mg for cycle 2, and 20 mg for all subsequent cycles) to characterize safety, efficacy and antitumor activity. Serial skin samples were collected to assess the impact on the tumor microenvironment and anti-tumor activity. Results: Ten pts. were evaluable for toxicities. Nine patients were evaluable for response with three patients at each dose level. 8 males/2 females, age 29-59 y, with refractory/advanced CTCL, clinical stages IB (1), IIA (3), IIB (4), IIIA (1), and aggressive epidermotropic CD8+ CTCL (1) and a median of prior systemic treatments of 3 (range, 2-4) have been enrolled. Median follow up time was 12 (range, 3-24+) months. No serious AEs or DLTs were observed during the DLT evaluation period (cycles 1-3). The most frequently reported AEs were fatigue (n=7), skin pain (n=4), chills (n=3), anemia (n=3), and leukopenia (4). One grade 3 maculopapular rash (possibly due to lenalidomide) was observed, all other treatment-related AEs were grade 1/2 in severity. Median cycles of treatment were 7 (range, 3-20+) months. Median duration of response was 4 (range, 1- 21+) months. Six pts achieved PR, while 3 pts maintained stable disease. Three pts remain on treatment. Expression panels of several checkpoints (PD1, PD-L1 & ICOS) (Cycle1 Day1 vs Cycle 2 Day15) were analyzed. Detectable levels of PD-L1 but low levels of ICOS are observed in responding pts vs. high PD-L1 and ICOS levels in non-responders. GEP highlights downregulation of TNF-alpha signaling via NFkB, IFN-gamma, and PI3-AKT-mTOR signaling pathways among other pathways. Conclusions: Durvalumab/lenalidomide has significant clinical activity in refractory/advanced CTCL, which will be formally evaluated in the Phase 2 portion. Responses were durable and ongoing, and treatment was well tolerated. Dose escalation is up to lenalidomide 20 mg daily. Our preliminary results from pts on trial demonstrated that immune signatures on skin biopsies at baseline may be predictive of response to checkpoint blockade and yield insights into mechanisms of therapeutic resistance. Disclosures Querfeld: Bioniz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Investigator; Soligenix: Other: Investigator; Celgene: Other: Investigator, Research Funding; City of Hope Cancer Center and Beckman Research Institute: Employment; Medivir: Consultancy; Trillium: Consultancy, Other: Investigator, Research Funding; miRagen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Investigator; Kyowa: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Investigator; Eisai: Other: Investigator; Elorac: Other: Investigator, Research Funding; Helsinn: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Investigator. Palmer:Gilead Sciences: Consultancy. Zain:Spectrum: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Combination Treatment of the Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Ibrutinib and Carfilzomib in Patients with Relapsed or Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Initial Results from a Multicenter Phase 1/2b Study

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 377-377 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ajai Chari ◽  
Saurabh Chhabra ◽  
Saad Usmani ◽  
Sarah Larson ◽  
Ruben Niesvizky ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: Recent advances have improved outcomes for patients (pts) with multiple myeloma (MM); however, novel agents targeting different pathways are still needed. Ibrutinib (ibr) is a first-in-class, once-daily, oral, covalent inhibitor of Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK), an enzyme overexpressed in malignant plasma cells, whose expression may positively regulate the myeloma stem cell-like population (Yang 2015). Clinical activity was observed at the 840-mg dose of ibr in heavily pretreated pts with relapsed or relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM), when combined with weekly dexamethasone (dex) (Vij 2014). Furthermore, BTK-mediated upregulation of NF-κB p65 contributes to proteasome inhibitor (PI) resistance in MM cell lines; thus, BTK inhibition with ibr may help overcome PI resistance (Murray 2015). In vitro, ibr has demonstrated synergy with PIs in MM (Rushworth 2013) and mantle cell lymphoma cells (Ou 2013). PCYC-1119 (NCT01962792) is an ongoing phase 1/2b study of ibr + carfilzomib (CFZ) ± dex in RRMM. Methods: Eligible pts received ≥2 prior therapies, including bortezomib (BTZ) and an immunomodulatory agent (IMiD) and had either no response or documented disease progression following the most recent treatment. Dose escalation followed a 3+3 design, followed by expansion of 2 cohorts (Table). Phase 1 primary objectives were maximum tolerated dose/recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) determination and safety. Results: As of July 8, 2015, 40 pts were enrolled and received ibr combined with CFZ ± dex across multiple dose levels during the phase 1 portion. No dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed, and cohorts 2b and 3b were chosen for expansion to further evaluate safety and efficacy. Pts had a median age of 63 y (range, 44-83) and a median time from diagnosis of 4.3 y (range, 0.5-25.3). Cytogenetic assessment by FISH identified that 20% and 8% of pts had t4;14 and del17p, respectively. Overall, pts received a median of 3 prior lines of therapy (range, 2-11), including 10% prior CFZ, 25% pomalidomide, 25% thalidomide, 73% autologous stem cell transplant, and 100% BTZ and lenalidomide. Moreover, 88% of pts were refractory to their last therapy, with 73% refractory to BTZ, 73% refractory to lenalidomide, and 58% refractory both to IMiD and PI. No relevant differences were observed across cohorts. Thirty-six pts were evaluable for efficacy. With early follow-up, the initial objective response rate (ORR) was 58% and the clinical benefit rate (CBR) was 67%. In cohort 3b, the ORR and CBR were 65% and 77%, respectively, including 3 very good partial responses (VGPRs) and 1 stringent complete response (sCR). No clinically meaningful tolerability differences were seen between cohorts, and no new safety findings were observed. Across all cohorts, the most common all-grade nonhematologic adverse events (AEs) were diarrhea (43%), cough (35%), constipation and fatigue (30% each), and nausea (28%). Grade ≥3 hematologic AEs included thrombocytopenia (15%), anemia (13%), and neutropenia (5%). Grade ≥3 nonhematologic AEs occurring in ≥10% of pts were pneumonia and hypertension (15% each), diarrhea (13%), and fatigue (10%). Eleven pts reported treatment related SAEs. No clinically relevant differences in AEs were observed across cohorts. Ten pts discontinued study treatment due to progressive disease; an additional 6 pts discontinued due to an AE, and 6 pts discontinued due to investigator or pt decision. Duration of treatment ranged from 0.3 to 13.6 months, and 17 pts remain on treatment. Updated data will be presented. Conclusions: The initial phase 1 data indicated promising clinical potential for ibr + CFZ + dex, as it is well tolerated with no DLTs, no new toxicities, and no increase in the severity of known toxicities for the individual agents. The preliminary ORR of 58%, with 1 sCR and 3 VGPRs in cohort 3b, is encouraging in this mostly refractory patient population, especially with the high number refractory to BTZ. Cohort 3b was established as the RP2D and will be further evaluated in the phase 2 portion of the study. Table. Dosing Cohorts Cohort ibr* mg/qd CFZ† mg/m2 dex‡ mg 1(n=3) 560 20/27 - 2a(n=5) 560 20/36 - 2b(n=14) 560 20/36 20 3b(n=18) 840 20/36 20 *Starts on Day (D) 8 of Cycle (C) 1; continuous thereafter. †D1-2, 8-9, 15-16 through C12; thereafter D1-2, 15-16. ‡D1-2, 8-9, 15-16, 22-23; 10 mg for pts age ≥75 y; 4 mg prior to CFZ during C1 only (cohorts 1 and 2a) with re-initiation as needed. Disclosures Chari: Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millenium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Array: Consultancy, Research Funding. Off Label Use: ibrutinib in relapsed or relapsed/refractory MM. Usmani:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millenium: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Array BioPharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Research Funding; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Larson:BMS: Consultancy. Niesvizky:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millenium: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Matous:Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Millenium: Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Speakers Bureau. Gasparetto:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Honoraria; Millennium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Holkova:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Lunning:TG Therapeutics: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Spectrum: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Juno: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy. Valent:Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau. Anderson:Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau. Kwei:Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Employment. Chang:Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Employment. Graef:Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Employment; AbbVie: Equity Ownership. Bilotti:Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Employment. McDonagh:Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding.

Elotuzumab In Combination with Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone In Patients with Relapsed Multiple Myeloma: Interim Results of a Phase 2 Study

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 986-986 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul G. Richardson ◽  
Philippe Moreau ◽  
Andrzej J Jakubowiak ◽  
Thierry Facon ◽  
Sundar Jagannath ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Phase 1 Study ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Phase 2 Study ◽  
Infusion Reactions

Abstract Abstract 986 Introduction: Elotuzumab is a humanized monoclonal IgG1 antibody directed against CS1, an antigen highly and uniformly expressed on multiple myeloma (MM) cells but with restricted expression on normal cells. Elotuzumab exhibits significant antimyeloma activity in vitro and against MM xenografts, and its antitumor activity is enhanced independently by both lenalidomide and dexamethasone. In a dose-escalation phase 1 study that evaluated the combination of elotuzumab (5, 10, and 20 mg/kg), lenalidomide, and dexamethasone, the maximum tolerated dose was not reached, and the combination showed encouraging clinical activity (82% response rate) in patients with advanced MM. The most frequent infusion-related adverse events (AEs) were headache (21%), nausea (21%), and dizziness (11%), with 7% (2/28) of patients experiencing 3 serious infusion-related AEs during cycle 1 (1 with a grade 4 hypersensitivity reaction and 1 with 2 grade 3 stridor events). Key objectives of this dose randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase 2 study in patients with relapsed MM were to select the optimum dose of elotuzumab and to evaluate an enhanced premedication regimen to minimize the occurrence of infusion reactions. Methods: Patients with confirmed relapsed and/or refractory MM who had received 1–3 prior therapies were enrolled; prior lenalidomide therapy was excluded. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive elotuzumab either 10 or 20 mg/kg (IV infusion on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of a 28-day cycle in the first 2 cycles and then days 1 and 15 of subsequent cycles), along with lenalidomide 25 mg PO daily on days 1 to 21 and dexamethasone 40 mg PO weekly. Patients were treated until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, if earlier. To control potential infusion reactions, patients received methylprednisolone (50 mg IV), diphenhydramine (25–50 mg PO or IV) or equivalent, ranitidine (50 mg IV) or equivalent, and acetaminophen (650–1000 mg PO) 30 to 60 minutes prior to each elotuzumab infusion. Objective responses (OR) were assessed according to the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria. Results: As of July 8, 2010, a total of 59 patients were randomized (intent to treat population); 47 patients received at least 1 dose of study medication (safety population); and 26 patients completed or progressed prior to completing 2 cycles of treatment (efficacy population). Median age was 64 years; 36 (61%) had received ≥2 prior therapies; 28 (48%) and 31 (53%) had received bortezomib or thalidomide, respectively, and 40 (68%) had undergone transplantation. Among efficacy evaluable patients, 22/26 (85%) had a confirmed or an unconfirmed response (≥ PR) including 31% VGPR/CR. The remaining 4/26 (15%) had stable disease (Table). Treatment-emergent AEs were reported in 36/47 patients (77%); the most common events were fatigue (26%) and nausea (21%). Serious treatment-emergent AEs were reported in 22% of patients; 2 events, nausea and febrile neutropenia with thrombocytopenia, were considered to be related to elotuzumab and lenalidomide. The most common infusion-related AEs within 24 hours of elotuzumab infusion were dizziness (15%), nausea (15%), and headache (9%). These decreased in frequency after the first treatment cycle. There were no severe AEs associated with infusion reactions. Conclusion: The combination of elotuzumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone resulted in a high response rate in patients with advanced MM and was generally well tolerated. These results are consistent with the results previously reported from the phase 1 study. The revised premedication regimen appeared to be more effective in controlling infusion reactions, which were generally mild to moderate with no severe infusion reactions reported to date. Updated response and safety data on all patients by dose level will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures: Richardson: Millennium, Celgene, Johnson & Johnson, Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: Lenalidomide. Moreau:Celgene, Facet, Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Jakubowiak:Millennium, Celgene, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Johnson & Johnson Ortho-Centocor: Honoraria; Millennium, Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium, Celgene, Centocor-Ortho Biotech: Speakers Bureau. Facon:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Jagannath:Millennium, Takeda Pharm, Janssen: Honoraria. Vij:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Celgene: Research Funding; Celgene, Bristol-Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau. Reece:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Rossi:Sanofi-Aventis, Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Tsao:Facet Biotech: Employment. Fry:Facet Biotech: Employment. Berman:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Employment. Singhal:Facet Biotech: Employment. Lonial:Millennium, Celgene, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Onyx: Advisory Board, Consultancy; Millennium, Celgene, Novartis, Onyx, Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding.

Multicenter Phase I Dose-Escalation Study of Lenalidomide in Patients with Relapsed Adult T-Cell Leukemia-Lymphoma (ATL) or Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma (PTCL).

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 2737-2737 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naokuni Uike ◽  
Michinora Ogura ◽  
Yoshitaka Imaizumi ◽  
Norio Asou ◽  
Atae Utsunomiya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Phase 2 Study ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 2737 Introduction: ATL is prevalent in Japan and has the worst prognosis among T-cell malignancies. PTCL also has a poor prognosis with currently available chemotherapeutic regimens, and both would benefit from better treatment modality. Lenalidomide is an immunomodulatory agent with direct tumoricidal and antiproliferative activity, and is approved for multiple myeloma (MM) in combination with dexamethasone after at least 1 prior therapy and for transfusion-dependent anemia due to low- or intermediate-1-risk myelodysplastic syndromes associated with 5q deletion. We conducted a phase 1 study of lenalidomide in patients with relapsed ATL or PTCL to establish the recommended dose and schedule for a subsequent phase 2 study. Patients and Methods: This multicenter, phase 1, dose-escalation study assessed the safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics, and efficacy in patients with relapsed advanced ATL or PTCL. Dose-escalation was conducted according to the standard 3+3 design. Up to one PTCL patient was allowed to be included in each cohort of 3 patients. Patients in Cohort 1 received oral lenalidomide 25 mg daily on Days 1–21 of a 28-day cycle. Patients in Cohorts 2 and 3 received 25 and 35 mg/day, respectively, on each day of the 28-day cycle. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as febrile neutropenia lasting 5 or more days; thrombocytopenia (platelets <10,000/uL or bleeding requiring platelet transfusion); ALT/AST elevation of Grade 4 or that of Grade 3 lasting 7 or more days; and/or clinically unacceptable Grade 3 or higher other non-hematological adverse events (AEs). Treatment was continued until the development of unacceptable toxicity or progressive disease (PD). Response was assessed by internationally accepted standard criteria for ATL and PTCL. Results: From July 2010–June 2012, 13 Japanese patients (9 ATL and 4 PTCL; age 32–74 years [median, 64]; 1–11 prior therapies [median, 1]) were enrolled: 3 in Cohort 1, 6 in Cohort 2, and 4 in Cohort 3. The 3 patients in Cohort 1 received lenalidomide for 21, 103, and 637 days, respectively, until PD with no instances of DLT. In Cohort 2, 1 patient experienced DLT (thrombocytopenia, platelets <10,000/uL) and 4 patients received lenalidomide for 37, 56, 138, and 387 days, respectively, until PD in 3 patients and unrelated death in one. The sixth patient is still receiving lenalidomide for 28+ days without a DLT. In Cohort 3, 2 patients had DLTs (thrombocytopenia, platelets <10,000/uL in one patient and Grade 3 prolongation of QTc interval in one patient on concomitant fluconazole with preexisting cardiac disease and grade 1 QTc prolongation at baseline), 1 patient received lenalidomide for 71 days before withdrawal of consent, and 1 patient is still receiving lenalidomide for 323+ days without a DLT. Based on these results, 25 mg daily per 28-day cycle was regarded as the MTD. Other Grade 3/4 non-DLT AEs occurring in 2 or more patients included neutropenia (n=8), lymphocytopenia (n=7), thrombocytopenia (n=3), skin rash (n=3), hyperbilirubinemia (n=2), and increased ALT/AST (n=2). Among the 9 ATL patients, 3 achieved partial responses (PR) with hematological complete response in 2 patients, including the disappearance of skin lesions in 1 patient. These responses occurred between 54 and 57 days, and lasted for 92, 279+ and 505 days. Among the 4 PTCL patients, 1 achieved a PR at day 106 with >75% reduction in lymph nodes, which lasted for 282 days. PK profiles of patients in the study were generally consistent with that observed in Japanese MM patients. Plasma exposure of lenalidomide increased with increasing dose with a mean Cmax on Day 1 for 25 mg and 35 mg of 493 ng/mL and 628 ng/mL, respectively, and a mean AUC24 of 2774 ng/mL and 3062 ng/mL, respectively. There was no evidence of accumulation following multiple dosing for 8 days. Conclusions: This phase 1 study identified lenalidomide 25 mg daily per 28-day cycle as the dose and schedule for a subsequent phase 2 study in patients with ATL or PTCL. Based on the preliminary evidence of antitumor activity in ATL and PTCL patients, a phase 2 study in patients with relapsed ATL in Japan is planned. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Lenalidomide (CC-5013) is an investigational agent in Japan; this abstract assesses its use in adult ATL patients. Tobinai:Merck: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Zenyaku: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Genzyme: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Eisai: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Symbio: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Eli Lilly: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Kyowa-Kirin: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Biomedics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Solasia Pharma: Clinical trials, Clinical trials Other, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Johnson & Johnson: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding; Chugai/Roche: Research Funding; Takeda: Clinical trials, Clinical trials Other, Research Funding.

scholarly journals FT-2102, an IDH1m Inhibitor, in Combination with Azacitidine in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) or Myelodysplastic Ayndrome (MDS): Results from a Phase 1 Study

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1452-1452 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge E. Cortes ◽  
Justin Watts ◽  
Thomas Prebet ◽  
Gary J. Schiller ◽  
Sangmin Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Advisory Committee ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Clinical Data ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Inadequate Response ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Phase 1 Study ◽  
Advisory Committees

Abstract Background: Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 mutations (IDH1m) occur in 7-14% of AML patients and 3% of MDS patients. Mutated IDH1 metabolizes alpha-ketoglutarate into 2-hydroxyglutarate (2-HG), an oncometabolite that impairs differentiation. FT-2102 is an oral, highly potent, selective small molecule inhibitor of mutated IDH1, with the therapeutic potential to restore normal cellular differentiation. Azacitidine (AZA), a hypomethylating agent (HMA), is a standard of care for MDS and for AML patients unfit for intensive therapy. We present Phase 1 clinical data from the ongoing Phase 1/2 study of FT-2102 in combination with azacitidine (FT-2102+AZA) in patients with IDH1m AML and MDS (CT.gov: NCT02719574). Methods: A Phase 1 study was initiated to evaluate the safety, PK/PD, and antileukemic activity of FT-2102 in patients with IDH1m AML or MDS and included both dose escalation and expansion. FT-2102 was administered daily (150 QD or 150 BID) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity; AZA was administered at 75 mg/m2 IV or SC daily for 7 days of each 28-day cycle. Eligible patients had IDH1m AML/MDS that was relapsed/refractory (R/R) or treatment-naïve (TN), were eligible for AZA therapy and had adequate liver and renal function. Prior IDH1 inhibitors and hypomethylating agents were allowed, and there were no restrictions for concomitant non-anticancer medications. Investigator-assessed responses were per modified IWG 2003/2006 criteria. Efficacy was assessed at Cycle 2 Day 1 and as clinically indicated thereafter. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed throughout the study per NCI CTCAE version 4.03. Results: At the time of the data cutoff, 07 April 2018, 27 patients had been enrolled and 26 had been treated with FT-2102+AZA, with a median of 3 months on treatment (range: 0.2 to 12 months). Of the 27 enrolled patients, 24 had AML (20 R/R; 4 TN) and 3 patients had MDS (all TN). The median number of prior antileukemia therapies was 3 (range: 0-5) in the AML patients. Doses of FT-2102 were 150 mg QD (n=7) and 150 mg BID (n=20). Thirteen (50%) patients discontinued treatment, with the most common reasons for treatment discontinuation were hematopoietic stem cell transplant (n=4), death (n=2), and progressive disease (n=2). No patients discontinued due to an AE. Severe (≥ Grade 3) AEs occurring in ≥ 5% of patients included febrile neutropenia (27%), anemia, thrombocytopenia, leukocytosis (19% each), fatigue, hypertension, neutropenia (15% each), nausea, pneumonia, hypokalemia (12% each) and abdominal pain (8%). Three patients had differentiation syndrome (IDH-DS), which resolved with FT-2102 temporary interruption, and treatment with dexamethasone, hydroxyurea, and supportive care in all three. Five patients died within 28-days of the last dose of study drug, none of which were considered related to FT-2102+AZA. No DLTs were observed during dose escalation. PK analysis demonstrated no impact of AZA on steady-state exposure of FT-2102. 2-HG levels to normal levels by C2D1. Table 1 shows the Investigator-assessed ORR per IWG. Responses have been seen as early as 1 month on treatment, and stable disease for greater than 6 months; 50% of patients remain on treatment. Conclusions: FT-2102+AZA is well tolerated in AML and MDS, with 150 mg BID selected as the RP2D based on safety, PK and PD (2-HG) response. Clinical activity has been observed, with an ORR of 42%. Durable CRs (>12 months) have been observed. The current data support the continued evaluation of FT-2102 150 mg BID+AZA in the Phase 2 study. Three Phase 2 combination therapy cohorts are currently open for enrollment in patients < 60 years with R/R AML or MDS naïve to HMA and IDH1m inhibitors; R/R AML or MDS with inadequate response/PD on HMA, and R/R AML or MDS who have progressed on a prior IDH1m inhibitor. Updated clinical data will be available at the time of presentation. Disclosures Cortes: Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Arog: Research Funding; Astellas Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Schiller:Celator/Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Lee:AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Clinipace: Consultancy; Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc: Consultancy; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy. Wang:Amgen: Consultancy; Jazz: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy; Jazz: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ferrell:Incyte: Research Funding. Jonas:LP Therapeutics: Research Funding; Genentech/Roche: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Kalobios: Research Funding; Glycomimetics: Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Forma: Research Funding; Accelerated Medical Diagnostics: Research Funding; Tolero: Consultancy; Esanex: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Wei:Novartis: Honoraria, Other: Advisory committee, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory committee, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Other: Advisory committee; Abbvie: Honoraria, Other: Advisory board, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria, Other: Advisory committee, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Advisory committee, Research Funding. Montesinos:Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Kelly:Forma Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Li:Forma Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Sweeney:Forma Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Watson:Forma Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Mohamed:Forma Therapeutics Inc.: Employment.

The Speed of Response to Single-Agent Carfilzomib in Patients with Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma: An Exploratory Analysis of Results From 2 Multicenter Phase 2 Clinical Trials,

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 3969-3969
Author(s):  
Luhua Wang ◽  
David S. Siegel ◽  
Andrzej J Jakubowiak ◽  
Alvin F. Wong ◽  
Sandra Dixon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Exploratory Analysis ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Speed Of Response

Abstract Abstract 3969 Introduction: Carfilzomib is a next-generation proteasome inhibitor that selectively and irreversibly binds to its target. Phase 1 and 2 studies with carfilzomib have demonstrated durable single-agent antitumor activity with a favorable safety profile in patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Results from a phase 1 study of carfilzomib in patients with relapsed and/or refractory hematologic malignancies (Alsina et al. Blood. 2007;110: Abstract 411) as well as those from an independent study of carfilzomib in the frontline combination setting (Jakubowiak, et al. Haematologica. 2011;96(2): Abstract P-253) have suggested that initial responses occur rapidly and the depth of response improves with continued treatment. Based on these encouraging findings, we have performed an exploratory analysis to evaluate the time to initial response (or the speed of response) from the following 2 multicenter phase 2 clinical trials with carfilzomib: 1) PX-171-003-A1, an open-label, single-arm phase 2 trial that enrolled patients with relapsed and refractory MM following ≥2 prior regimens and 2) PX-171-004, an open-label phase 2 trial in bortezomib-naïve and bortezomib-treated patients with relapsed or refractory MM following 1–3 prior regimens. Methods: Patients in study PX-171-003-A1 received carfilzomib 20 mg/m2 in Cycle 1 on Days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16 of a 28-day cycle and were dose escalated to 27 mg/m2 on the same schedule thereafter for up to 12 cycles. Patients enrolled in PX-171-004 either received 20 mg/m2 for all treatment cycles or a stepped-up, dose-escalating regimen of 20 mg/m2for Cycle 1 and 27 mg/m2for all treatment cycles thereafter. Responses and progression were determined according to the International Myeloma Working Group criteria modified to include minimal response (MR) per European Blood and Marrow Transplant Group criteria and were assessed and confirmed by an Independent Review Committee. Responses were assessed on Day 15 of Cycle 1 and Day 1 of Cycles 2 through 12 and at the end of study. Time to response, as presented here, is the time from the start of treatment to either 1) the first confirmed response of MR or better or 2) the first confirmed response of PR of better. Results: A total of 257 response-evaluable patients from PX-171-003-A1 and 162 response-evaluable patients from PX-171-004 were eligible for inclusion in this exploratory analysis. Patients from the 003-A1 study had received a median of 5 prior anti-MM regimens, while bortezomib-naïve patients from the 004 study and bortezomib-treated patients had received a median of 2 and 3 prior regimens, respectively. Of these, 95 patients from 003-A1 and 78 bortezomib-naïve (both dose cohorts combined) and 11 bortezomib-treated patients from 004 had minimal responses (MR) or better and were analyzed for time to response. The specific time to response data are presented in the table below and are separated by study and by prior bortezomib exposure (ie, BTZ-naïve or BTZ-treated) for the 004 study. Patients from all cohorts in both clinical trials responded relatively rapidly with similar median times to response in patients from the 003-A1 study and from the 004 study (both bortezomib-naïve and treated). At the same time, the depth of responses improved with continued carfilzomib treatment. An analysis of time to best response will be presented. Conclusions: Based on this exploratory analysis, the speed of response to single-agent carfilzomib was rapid (within a median of 0.5–1.0 months to achieve responses of MR or better) in patients with relapsed and refractory MM in 2 multicenter clinical trials. This preliminary analysis represents the first focused evaluation of the dynamics of response to carfilzomib and the results merit additional evaluation in the setting of ongoing and future clinical trials. Disclosures: Wang: Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Siegel:Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Jakubowiak:Ortho Biotech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Exelixis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Wong:Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Dixon:Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Renau:Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Vij:Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Speakers Bureau.

Phase 1 Study of Tazemetostat (EPZ-6438), an Inhibitor of Enhancer of Zeste-Homolog 2 (EZH2): Preliminary Safety and Activity in Relapsed or Refractory Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL) Patients

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 473-473 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincent Ribrag ◽  
Jean-Charles Soria ◽  
Jean-Marie Michot ◽  
Anna Schmitt ◽  
Sophie Postel-Vinay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Somatic Mutations ◽  
Tumor Tissue ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Cell Of Origin ◽  
Advisory Committees

Abstract Introduction: The histone methyl transferase EZH2 is the catalytic subunit of the polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) and responsible for methylation of lysine 27 of histone H3 (H3K27), a modification of DNA associated with repressed transcription when trimethylated (H3K27me3). Aberrant EZH2 activity has been implicated as an oncogenic driver in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Here we report the phase 1 first-in-human experience to date with tazemetostat in patients (pts) with NHL. Methods: Tazemetostat was administered orally twice daily (BID) to subjects in five dose cohorts (100 mg [n=6], 200 mg [n= 3], 400 mg [n=3], 800 mg [n=14], 1600 mg [n=12], and one food effect cohort (400 mg [n=7]). Tumor response assessments were performed every 8 weeks. Archival tumor tissue from NHL pts was analysed for EZH2 hot spot mutations Y646X, A682G and A692V (by either amplicon-based next generation sequencing [NGS] or cobas ® EZH2 Mutation Test [in development]), and for additional somatic mutations by NGS focusing on a panel of 39 genes commonly mutated in NHL. In addition, cell-of-origin in Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) patients was determined by immunohistochemistry on archival tumor tissue using the Hans algorithm (Blood, 2004). Results: As of 9-July 2015, 45 pts were enrolled to this trial (CT.gov: NCT01897571). To date 19 NHL pts: 13 DLBCL, 5 follicular lymphoma (FL) and 1 marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) were enrolled. Results to date on the 26 solid tumor pts have been reported separately (ECC, 2015). Adverse events (AE) occurring in >10% of the 45 pts regardless of attribution were: asthenia, anorexia, constipation, nausea, dysgeusia, vomiting and muscle spasms with 5 grade 3 or greater related AE's: thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, hypertension, anorexia and transaminase elevation. The median age of the NHL patients enrolled was 62 yrs (range 23-82) and 74% of pts were male. Of the fifteen evaluable NHL pts, objective responses were seen in: 5/9 DLBCL, 3/5 FL and 1/1 MZL. The majority of objective responses occurred at the Recommended Phase 2 Dose of 800 mg BID. EZH2 status in patient tumors was determined for 14/19 NHL patients (n=3 data pending, n=2 tissue unavailable) with 13/14 found to be wild-type (WT) and one patient, who experienced an ongoing PR at week 16, expressing an Y646H mutation. Updated data including duration of response will be presented. In addition, 10/13 patients had evidence of somatic mutations in >1 non-EZH2 genes among the 39 genes tested (allelic frequency >10% with coverage >1000X) known to be commonly mutated in NHL, e.g. MYD88 & CARD11, or involved in epigenetic signalling, e.g. EP300 & CREBBP. Table.Relapsed or refractory NHLTotal(n=19)Evaluable(n=15)Best Response CR+PRaBest Response SDaDLBCLGCB4220Non-GCB6520undetermined3210FL5531MZL1110aper IWG (Cheson, 2007), complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) Conclusions: Tazemetostat demonstrates a safety profile favorable for chronic dosing and objective responses in pts with either EZH2 WT or mutant B-cell lymphoma, including both GCB and non-GCB sub-types of DLBCL. EZH2 pathway genes and genes commonly somatically mutated in lymphoma are under investigation to elucidate the mechanisms and biomarkers of clinical response to tazemetostat. Based upon the observed safety and efficacy profile of tazemetostat, a phase 2 trial in relapsed or refractory DLBCL and FL pts, stratified by cell-of-origin and EZH2 mutation status, is enrolling. Disclosures Ribrag: Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Eisai: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Pharmamar: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Thomson:Epizyme, Inc: Employment. Keilhack:Epizyme: Employment, Equity Ownership. Blakemore:Epizyme: Employment. Reyderman:Eisai: Employment. Kumar:Eisai: Employment. Fine:Epizyme: Employment. McDonald:Epizyme: Employment. Ho:Epizyme, Inc: Employment.

scholarly journals A Phase I/II Study of Ibrutinib and Ixazomib in Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma: PrE0404

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1541-1541
Author(s):  
Jonathon B. Cohen ◽  
Craig A. Portell ◽  
Mehdi Hamadani ◽  
Opeyemi Jegede ◽  
Catherine Diefenbach ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Proteasome Inhibitors ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Duration Of Response

Background: The Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor ibrutinib is highly effective as a monotherapy in relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) with an overall response rate of 68% (Wang et al, NEJM 2013), but the duration of response is shorter than what is seen in chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and the survival of patients who progress after receiving ibrutinib is as short as 3 months (Martin et al, Blood, 2016). In addition, the complete response (CR) rate is only 21%. Ibrutinib-containing combinations may improve depth and duration of response in patients with relapsed/refractory MCL. While use of the proteasome inhibitor, bortezomib, can be limited due to the development of peripheral neuropathy, it has an ORR of 33% (CR rate 8%) in MCL, and preclinical models suggest a synergism between proteasome inhibitors and ibrutinib in MCL cell lines (Axelrod et al, Leukemia 2014). We developed a phase 1/2 trial of ibrutinib combined with the oral proteasome inhibitor ixazomib in patients with relapsed/refractory MCL. Methods: PrE0404 will be open at 18 sites nationwide and is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03323151). It is currently enrolling patients with relapsed/refractory MCL who have received at least 1 prior line of combination therapy. Patients receiving prior BTK or proteasome inhibitors are eligible, and patients may have received prior autologous or allogeneic transplantation as long as they do not have active graft versus host disease. Patients must have ≤ grade 1 peripheral neuropathy. For phase 1, patients are required to have been off of a BTK inhibitor for 3 months. Starting dose of ibrutinib for all patients is 560mg daily, and dose levels of ixazomib for the phase 1 trial range from 3mg to 4mg days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28 day cycle. Patients continued therapy until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. For the phase 1 portion of the study, patients are monitored for a dose limiting toxicity (DLT) during cycle 1, defined as grade 3 thrombocytopenia with significant bleeding, select grade 3 non-hematologic toxicities, grade 4 thrombocytopenia, grade 4 febrile neutropenia, grade 4 non-hematologic toxicity, or any grade 5 toxicity. In addition, any toxicity-related dose delay &gt; 7 days of ibrutinib or ixazomib or an inability to receive all 3 doses of ixazomib during cycle 1 are considered DLT's. The maximum tolerated dose/recommended phase 2 dose will be the dose at which fewer than 1/6 patients experience a DLT, with the maximum dose of ixazomib will be 4mg. The primary endpoint for the phase 2 portion of the study is CR rate, and patients will be assigned to one of two cohorts based on prior BTK-inhibitor exposure. For ibrutinib-naïve patients, we will target a CR rate of 40% (based on a historical CR rate of 21% for ibrutinib), and for ibrutinib-pretreated patients, we will target a CR rate of 23% (based on a historical CR rate of 8% for bortezomib). There is 86% statistical power & a one-sided 10% alpha to test each hypothesis. We will accrue 31 patients to each cohort in order to detect this difference. Secondary and exploratory endpoints will include progression-free and overall survival, overall response, toxicity, frequency of BTK mutations, and response based on molecular risk stratification. As of July 2019 the study is open to accrual at 14 sites and is expected to move to phase 2 in fall 2019, at which time it will be expanded to 18 sites. Disclosures Cohen: Hutchison: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Meyers Squibb Company: Research Funding; Genentech, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Lymphoma Research Foundation: Research Funding; ASH: Research Funding; UNUM: Research Funding; Gilead/Kite: Consultancy; Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc.: Research Funding. Portell:Infinity: Research Funding; Roche/Genentech: Research Funding; Xencor: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Acerta/AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Kite: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy; AbbVie: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; BeiGene: Consultancy, Research Funding. Hamadani:ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Sanofi Genzyme: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Otsuka: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding; Medimmune: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy. Diefenbach:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Denovo: Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; MEI: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millenium/Takeda: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding. Landsburg:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Triphase: Research Funding; Triphase: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Curis, INC: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Curis, INC: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau. Kahl:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; BeiGene: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: Ixazomib is not currently approved for mantle cell lymphoma.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document