scholarly journals A Phase I/II Study of Ibrutinib and Ixazomib in Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma: PrE0404

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1541-1541
Author(s):  
Jonathon B. Cohen ◽  
Craig A. Portell ◽  
Mehdi Hamadani ◽  
Opeyemi Jegede ◽  
Catherine Diefenbach ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Proteasome Inhibitors ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Duration Of Response

Background: The Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor ibrutinib is highly effective as a monotherapy in relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) with an overall response rate of 68% (Wang et al, NEJM 2013), but the duration of response is shorter than what is seen in chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and the survival of patients who progress after receiving ibrutinib is as short as 3 months (Martin et al, Blood, 2016). In addition, the complete response (CR) rate is only 21%. Ibrutinib-containing combinations may improve depth and duration of response in patients with relapsed/refractory MCL. While use of the proteasome inhibitor, bortezomib, can be limited due to the development of peripheral neuropathy, it has an ORR of 33% (CR rate 8%) in MCL, and preclinical models suggest a synergism between proteasome inhibitors and ibrutinib in MCL cell lines (Axelrod et al, Leukemia 2014). We developed a phase 1/2 trial of ibrutinib combined with the oral proteasome inhibitor ixazomib in patients with relapsed/refractory MCL. Methods: PrE0404 will be open at 18 sites nationwide and is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03323151). It is currently enrolling patients with relapsed/refractory MCL who have received at least 1 prior line of combination therapy. Patients receiving prior BTK or proteasome inhibitors are eligible, and patients may have received prior autologous or allogeneic transplantation as long as they do not have active graft versus host disease. Patients must have ≤ grade 1 peripheral neuropathy. For phase 1, patients are required to have been off of a BTK inhibitor for 3 months. Starting dose of ibrutinib for all patients is 560mg daily, and dose levels of ixazomib for the phase 1 trial range from 3mg to 4mg days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28 day cycle. Patients continued therapy until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. For the phase 1 portion of the study, patients are monitored for a dose limiting toxicity (DLT) during cycle 1, defined as grade 3 thrombocytopenia with significant bleeding, select grade 3 non-hematologic toxicities, grade 4 thrombocytopenia, grade 4 febrile neutropenia, grade 4 non-hematologic toxicity, or any grade 5 toxicity. In addition, any toxicity-related dose delay > 7 days of ibrutinib or ixazomib or an inability to receive all 3 doses of ixazomib during cycle 1 are considered DLT's. The maximum tolerated dose/recommended phase 2 dose will be the dose at which fewer than 1/6 patients experience a DLT, with the maximum dose of ixazomib will be 4mg. The primary endpoint for the phase 2 portion of the study is CR rate, and patients will be assigned to one of two cohorts based on prior BTK-inhibitor exposure. For ibrutinib-naïve patients, we will target a CR rate of 40% (based on a historical CR rate of 21% for ibrutinib), and for ibrutinib-pretreated patients, we will target a CR rate of 23% (based on a historical CR rate of 8% for bortezomib). There is 86% statistical power & a one-sided 10% alpha to test each hypothesis. We will accrue 31 patients to each cohort in order to detect this difference. Secondary and exploratory endpoints will include progression-free and overall survival, overall response, toxicity, frequency of BTK mutations, and response based on molecular risk stratification. As of July 2019 the study is open to accrual at 14 sites and is expected to move to phase 2 in fall 2019, at which time it will be expanded to 18 sites. Disclosures Cohen: Hutchison: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Meyers Squibb Company: Research Funding; Genentech, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Lymphoma Research Foundation: Research Funding; ASH: Research Funding; UNUM: Research Funding; Gilead/Kite: Consultancy; Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc.: Research Funding. Portell:Infinity: Research Funding; Roche/Genentech: Research Funding; Xencor: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Acerta/AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Kite: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy; AbbVie: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; BeiGene: Consultancy, Research Funding. Hamadani:ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Sanofi Genzyme: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Otsuka: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding; Medimmune: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy. Diefenbach:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Denovo: Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; MEI: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millenium/Takeda: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding. Landsburg:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Triphase: Research Funding; Triphase: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Curis, INC: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Curis, INC: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau. Kahl:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; BeiGene: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: Ixazomib is not currently approved for mantle cell lymphoma.

scholarly journals Radioimmunotherapy for Mantle Cell Lymphoma: 5-Year Follow-up of 90 Patients from the International RIT-Registry

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5263-5263
Author(s):  
Karin Hohloch ◽  
Christine Windemuth-Kieselbach ◽  
Pier Luigi Zinzani ◽  
Roberto E. Cacchione ◽  
Wojciech Jurczak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Follicular Lymphoma ◽  
Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Primary Therapy ◽  
First Line ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Mantle Cell

To assess the efficacy of radioimmunotherapy (RIT) with 90yttrium-ibrutinib-tiuxetan (90Y-IT) in mantle cell lymphoma, data from 90 patients registered in the RIT Network with a median follow-up (FU) of 5.5 years after RIT were evaluated. 90Y-IT was given as first-line therapy in 45 (50%) (consolidation 44 pts., primary therapy 1 pt.) and at relapse in 45 (50%) patients (consolidation 24 pts., recurrence 12 pts., therapy refractory 3 pts., conditioning 2 pts., other 4 pts.). As a first-line treatment, 30 patients (pts.) (67%) achieved CR, 10 pts. (22%) PR%., 1 pt. (2%) PD, and for 4 pts. (9%) no response data was available. At relapse, CR was achieved in 17 pts. (38%), PR in 6 pts. (13%), SD in 2 pts. (4%), and 6 pts. (13%) had PD, while the response was not documented for 14 pts. (31%). After a median FU of 5.5 years, median PFS for all patients was 2.11 (95%CI: 1.03-2.32) years, and median OS was 4.05 (95%CI 2.79-7.21) years. Eleven pts. (12.2%) developed second malignancy. In conclusion, this is the largest report of MCL pts. treated with 90Y-IT to date. 90Y-IT was most often used as consolidation after first- and second-line chemotherapy and may improve the results achieved using chemoimmunotherapy alone. However, the results are less encouraging compared to treatment with small molecules such as ibrutinib. Disclosures Zinzani: TG Therapeutics: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Kyowa Kirin: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Portola: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Immune Design: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sandoz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celltrion: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Verastem: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Eusapharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy. Jurczak:Sandoz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Loxo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; MorphoSys: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Research Funding; Servier: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Celtrion: Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Truemper:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Nordic Nanovector: Consultancy; Mundipharma: Research Funding; Janssen Oncology: Consultancy. Scholz:Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy; Hexal: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy; GILEAD: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankio: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: Yttrium 90 (90Y) Ibritumomab Tiuxetan (Zevalin) is approved for treatment of patients with relapsed follicular lymphoma and as consolidation therapy after chemo(immuno)therapy of patients with follicular lymphoma.

A Phase I/II Study of Lenalidomide in Combination with Rituximab in Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 2719-2719 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luhua Wang ◽  
Luis Fayad ◽  
Fredrick B. Hagemeister ◽  
Sattva Neelapu ◽  
Felipe Samaniego ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 2719 Poster Board II-695 Background: Rituximab directly targets CD20 positive lymphoma cells while lenalidomide targets the microenvironment. This combination was proven effective in vitro and in vivo in mantle cell lymphoma (Wu et al, Clin Cancer Res 2008; Zhang et al, Am J Hematol 2009). Clinically, lenalidomide (Habermann et al, Br J Haematol 2009) and rituximab have single-agent activity in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) and may be an effective combination. The goal of our study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in phase 1 and evaluate the efficacy and safety of lenalidomide plus rituximab in patients with relapsed/refractory MCL in phase 2. Methods: Patients with relapsed/refractory MCL received lenalidomide on days 1–21 of every 28-day cycle, and rituximab (375 mg/m2) weekly during cycle 1. Dose escalation was used to determine the MTD with lenalidomide (10 mg, 15 mg, 20 mg, and 25 mg). Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic, or grade 4 hematologic adverse events in cycle 1. Phase 2 has reached targeted enrolment with 45 patients treated at MTD. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate progression free survival rate and response duration. Median time to event in months with 95% confidence interval was calculated. Of 45 patients treated at the MTD, the median age was 66 (46–85), 91% were males. All patients had received prior rituximab and were enrolled regardless of prior rituximab sensitivity or resistance. Results: The median follow-up time for the censored observations was 11.4 months. Two DLTs occurred at 25 mg in phase 1 (hypercalcemia, non-neutropenic fever); therefore, the MTD was 20 mg. The grade 3–4 non-hematologic events included elevated AST, elevated ALT, fatigue, myalgia, tremors, ataxia, cough, deep vein thrombosis, dyspnea, edema (facial), infection, neuropathy sensory, rash, and respiratory failure. Grade 3–4 hematologic adverse events included neutropenia (37 events), neutropenic fever (4 events), and thrombocytopenia (16 events). There were no responses in patients treated at 10 mg or 15 mg. Thirty six patients (36) were evaluable for response. Nine (9) patients are too early in their treatment and are not yet eligible for response evaluation. Among the 36 evaluable patients, 11 (31%) patients achieved CR, 8 (22%) patients achieved PR, 3 (8%) patients had minor response, 6 (17%) patients had stable disease and 8 (22%) patients had progressive mantle cell lymphoma. The overall response rate (CR + PR) was 53%. Seventy eight (78%) patients achieved stable disease or better and benefited from oral Lenalidomide plus 4 doses of rituximab. The median time to response was 2 months (2–8), and the median duration of response for the 19 patients with CR or PR was 18 months (95% CI: 10.6, NA) (range1–30 months). The median progression free survival for all patients on phase 2 was 14 months (95% CI: 9.8, NA) (ranging from 1–32 months). Conclusion: Oral lenalidomide plus rituximab resulted in durable responses in relapsed/refractory MCL with a favourable toxicity profile. Disclosures: Wang: Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Hagemeister:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy. Samaniego:Celgene Corporation: Research Funding. Yi:Celgene Corporation: Research Funding. Shah:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Elan: Consultancy; Millennium: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Bell:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Knight:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Zeldis:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Alternating Courses of 3x CHOP and 3x DHAP Plus Rituximab Followed by a High Dose ARA-C Containing Myeloablative Regimen and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT) Is Superior to 6 Courses CHOP Plus Rituximab Followed by Myeloablative Radiochemotherapy and ASCT In Mantle Cell Lymphoma: Results of the MCL Younger Trial of the European Mantle Cell Lymphoma Network (MCL net)

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 110-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olivier Hermine ◽  
Eva Hoster ◽  
Jan Walewski ◽  
Vincent Ribrag ◽  
Nicole Brousse ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Failure ◽  
Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 110 Background: Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL) has been characterized by poor long term prognosis with a median survival of only 3 to 4 years. However, outcome has improved during the last decades. In its first randomized trial, the MCL net demonstrated that myeloablative consolidation followed by ASCT resulted in a significant prolongation of PFS in advanced stage MCL (Dreyling et al Blood 2005). Recent phase II studies suggested that the addition of rituximab to CHOP like chemotherapy and/or high dose ARA-C may significantly improve remission rates and PFS. A French phase II trial using sequential R-CHOP/R-DHAP followed by ASCT showed an overall response rate of 95% with a CR rate of 61% translating into a median EFS of 83 months and a 75% survival rate at 5 years (Delarue et al ASH 2008). Methods: To evaluate the potential superiority of a high dose ARA-C containing regimen, the MCL net initiated a randomized trial comparing 6 courses of CHOP plus Rituximab followed by myeloablative radiochemotherapy (12 Gray TBI, 2×60mg/kg Cyclophosphamide) and ASCT (control arm A) versus alternating courses of 3x CHOP and 3x DHAP plus Rituximab followed by a high dose ARA-C containing myeloablative regimen (10 Gray TBI, 4×1,5 g/m2 Ara-C, 140mg/m2 melphalan) and ASCT (experimental arm B). Patient eligibility criteria included previously untreated MCL stage II-IV up to the age of 65 years. Histological diagnosis was confirmed by a central pathology review board. The primary end point time to treatment failure (TTF) was monitored continuously by a sequential procedure based on a one sided triangular test. Stable disease after induction, progression or death from any causes, were considered as treatment failure. Sample size was calculated to detect a hazard ratio of 52% for arm B with a power of 95%. Randomization was stopped as soon as a significant difference was observed between the two arms. Results: From July 2004 to May 2010, 497 patients were randomized in 4 countries (Germany, France, Poland, Belgium). The 391 patients evaluable for the primary analysis (19 no MCL, 87 not yet documented) displayed similar characteristics in both treatment arms: median age 55 vs 56 years, male 78% vs 79%, stage IV 85% vs 79%, B symptoms 43% vs 33%, ECOG >2 5% vs 5%, elevated LDH 37% vs 38%, and MIPI low/int/high risk 61%/25%/14% vs 62%/23%/15%, respectively. After induction overall response was similarly high in both arms (A: 90% vs B: 94%; p=0.19) and CR rate and combined CR/CRu rate were significantly higher in arm B (26% vs 39%; p=0.012 and 41% vs 60%; p=0.0003). The number of patients transplanted was similar in both arms (72% vs 73%) and after transplantation overall response and CR rates were comparable in both arms (97% vs 97% and 63% vs 65%, respectively). After a median follow up of 27 months, patients in arm B experienced a significantly longer TTF (49 months vs NR; p=0.0384, hazard ratio 0.68) mainly due to a lower number of relapses after CR/CRu/PR (20% vs 10%), whereas the rate of ASCT-related deaths in remission was similar in both arms (3% vs 4%). Although CR rate after ASCT was comparable in both arms, remission duration (RD) after ASCT was superior in Arm B (48m vs NR; p=0.047). Interestingly, for patients in CR after ASCT, RD after ASCT was also presumably superior in arm B (51 months vs NR; p=0.077). At the time of analysis overall survival was similar in both arms with medians not reached and 79% vs. 80% survival rates at 3 years (p=0.74). Safety after induction was comparable in both arms except for an increased grade 3/4 hematological toxicity (Hb 8% vs 28%, WBC 48% vs 75%, platelets 9% vs 74%, respectively), an excess of renal toxicity (creatinine grade 1/2: 8% vs 38%, grade 3/4: none vs 2%), and more frequent grade 1/2 nausea and vomiting in arm B. Toxicities of both conditioning regimen were similar, except for higher grade 3/4 mucositis (43% vs. 61%) in Arm B, and higher grade 1/2 liver toxicity and constipation in Arm A. Conclusions: High dose ARA-C in addition to R-CHOP+ASCT increases significantly complete response rates and TTF without clinically relevant increase of toxicity. Therefore, induction regimen containing high dose ARA-C followed by ASCT should become the new standard of care of MCL patients up to 65 years. Disclosures: Walewski: Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Stilgenbauer:Amgen: Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Genzyme: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi Aventis: Research Funding. Feugier:roche: Consultancy, Honoraria. Bosly:Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Gisselbrecht:Roche: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Pharmacogenomics Drives Lenalidomide Efficacy and MRD Kinetics in Mantle Cell Lymphoma after Autologous Transplantation: Results from the MCL0208 Multicenter, Phase III, Randomized Clinical Trial from the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi (FIL)

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 16-17
Author(s):  
Simone Ferrero ◽  
Daniele Grimaldi ◽  
Elena Arrigoni ◽  
Gian Maria Zaccaria ◽  
Beatrice Alessandria ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Treatment Efficacy ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Autologous Transplantation ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Strong Linkage Disequilibrium ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Mantle Cell

Background and Aims. Prediction of treatment efficacy is an active and growing field of pharmacology. In the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi (FIL) MCL0208 phase III trial (NCT02354313), a 24 months lenalidomide maintenance (LM, 15 mg days 1-21 every 28 days) after high-dose immuno-chemotherapy followed by autologous transplantation (ASCT) in 300 frontline mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) patients showed substantial clinical activity in terms of Progression-Free Survival (PFS) vs observation (OBS). However, this benefit seemed not uniform across patient series. To deeper investigate the differential pattern of response to lenalidomide, a wide analysis of the host pharmacogenomics (PG) background was planned, in order to dissect whether specific germline polymorphisms of transmembrane transporters, metabolic enzymes or cell surface receptors (ABCB1, ABCG2, VEGFA, FCGR2A, NCF4, GSTP1, CRBN) might predict the drug efficacy. Actually, several single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of ABCB1 exert an effect on substrate affinity of lenalidomide for the transmembrane transporter. Moreover, VEGFA is involved in the anti-angiogenic activity of lenalidomide and might eventually upregulate ABCB1 expression, too. Patients and methods. Genotypes for SNPs were obtained through allele-specific (ASO) probes on germline DNA from peripheral blood. Minor allele frequencies (MAFs) were obtained and the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) was checked. Genotypes were used to infer individual haplotypes by Arlequin and Haploview softwares. Minimal residual disease (MRD) was assessed with ASO primers on either IGH or BCL-1/IGH rearrangements by RQ-PCR in bone marrow samples. TP53 disruption was identified by NGS targeting resequencing and copy number variation analysis. Clinical-biological correlations were screened by automated machine learning methods and validated by both Kaplan-Meier at univariate level and Cox models for multivariate analysis (MV). A logistic regression was implemented to investigate correlations between polymorphisms and MRD kinetics. Results. 278 out of 300 patients (93%) were fully genotyped. The MAF values of the SNPs were very similar to published data and the HWE was confirmed. Most notably, ABCB1 c.2677G>T/A(W) and VEGFA c.2055A>C were significantly associated to outcome and are thus described in this abstract. In the case of ABCB1, the three loci were in strong linkage disequilibrium (p<0.001). 31% of patients were homozygous for ABCB1 wild type alleles (GG, "WT"), 53% heterozygous (GW, "HET") and 16% polymorphic on both chromosomes (WW, "POL"). 20% were VEGFA WT (AA), 47% HET (AC) and 33% POL (CC). PG did not impact on induction therapy and randomization rates of this trial, as superimposable polymorphism frequencies were described between the enrolled and randomized population. Conversely, both ABCB1 HET and POL and VEGFA HET/POL associated with higher MRD clearance rates vs WT after 6 months of LM (93% vs 71% and 91% vs 67%, respectively). Interestingly, the risk of MRD reappearance during LM was 86% lower for patients harboring either polymorphism vs WT (odds ratio 0.14, 95% CI 0.02-0.99; p<0.05). Actually, ABCB1 HET/POL predicted for a more favorable PFS vs WT in LM (3yPFS 85% vs 69% p<0.05, Fig.1A), as well as VEGFA HET/POL (3yPFS 85% vs 59% p<0.01, Fig.1B). The two polymorphisms co-occurred in 57% of patients, being 12% ABCB1 HET/POL only, 23% VEGFA HET/POL and 8% ABCB1/VEGFA WT. Interestingly, patients with either polymorphism had superimposable outcome to patients in whom both co-occurred (Fig.1C). Finally, MV showed that either polymorphism was protective for PFS among randomized patients (HR=0.42; 95% CI 0.20-0.85; p<0.05). According to this hypothesis, among the 17 ABCB1/VEGFA WT patients LM did not improved PFS vs OBS (Fig.1D), independently from TP53 disruption. Conclusions. The first PG data on LM after ASCT in MCL suggested that: 1) ABCB1 and VEGFA polymorphisms did not impact on the chemotherapeutic efficacy of FIL-MCL0208 trial; 2) both polymorphisms favored sustained MRD clearance during LM; 3) either polymorphism conferred a survival advantage during LM. Taken together, these observations hint that a variable excretion of lenalidomide through ABCB1 (heralded by SNPs), as well as an altered VEGFA pathway, could predict treatment efficacy. This observation might be very useful in the future to tailor lenalidomide therapy to MCL patients. Disclosures Ferrero: Servier: Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; EUSA Pharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Boccomini:SC Ematologia, ASOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy: Current Employment. Maria:Roche: Consultancy, Other: travel, accomodations, expenses; Abbvie: Consultancy, Other: travel, accomodations, expenses; BMS: Consultancy; MSD: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Other: travel, accomodations, expenses; Gilead: Consultancy, Other: travel, accomodations, expenses, Research Funding. Ferreri:Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Morphosys: Research Funding; Hutchinson: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding. Palumbo:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Galimberti:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Honoraria. OffLabel Disclosure: Lenalidomide maintenance in mantle cell lymphoma

scholarly journals Rituximab Plus Bendamustine and Cytarabine (R-BAC) in Elderly Patients with Newly Diagnosed Mantle Cell Lymphoma: Long Term Follow-up and Mrd Results of a Phase 2 Study from the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 384-384
Author(s):  
Maria Chiara Tisi ◽  
Luca Nassi ◽  
Caterina Patti ◽  
Michele Spina ◽  
Simone Ferrero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Mantle Cell

Abstract The activity of the combination of rituximab, bendamustine, and low dose cytarabine (R-BAC) was evaluated in a phase 2 multicentre trial from the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi (FIL RBAC500) in previously untreated patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) who were not eligible to stem cell transplant. Maintenance treatment was not planned after induction therapy, and no patient in the study received rituximab maintenance. Fifty-seven patients (median age 71 years, range 61-79) were recruited and treated with 4 to 6 cycles between 2012 and 2014. Despite some concern in terms of hematological toxicity, the R-BAC regimen was associated with high complete remission (CR) rate (91%), 2-years overall survival (OS) of 86% (74-93), and 2-years progression free survival (PFS) of 81% (68-89). Here, we present long-term survival outcomes. After 7 years of median follow-up (86 months, range 57-107), the median OS and PFS for all patients were not reached (Figure 1A and 1B). The 7-years PFS and OS rates were 56% (95%CI 41-67) and 63% (95%CI 46-72), respectively. Patients who achieved CR (n=53) had a 7 years PFS of 59% (95% CI 44-71), with the curve that appears to plateau after 6 years. Adverse predictive factors affecting PFS were blastoid morphology (p<0.05), elevated Ki67 > 30% (p<0.05), and failure to achieve CR after 2 cycles (p=0.03). Early-progression of disease (<24 months from start of R-BAC) was associated with impaired overall survival (p<0.05). Eight patients (14%) developed a secondary neoplasia: 1 parotid heteroplasia, 1 parotid nodular hyperplasia, 1 prostate cancer, 1 bladder cancer, 1 larynx, 1 thyroid cancer, 1 lung cancer and 1 secondary acute myeloid leukemia. Among the 25 relapsed patients, 8 did not receive any other treatment. Six had Ibrutinib monotherapy as second line, of whom 4 responded (3 are still in CR), 4 had CHOP or CHOP-like regimens with only partial responses. As per protocol, 31 patients with molecular marker at diagnosis and available samples were followed-up for minimal residual disease (MRD) with ASO-droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (D-PCR). Patients with MRD persistence at the end of induction, either in peripheral blood or bone marrow, had significantly worse 7 years-PFS (p<0.05 for them both). In conclusion, in elderly patients with newly diagnosed MCL, R-BAC showed sustained efficacy over time, which compared favorably with any other reported immuno-chemotherapy regimen (with or without maintenance) in similar populations. With a median OS exceeding 60% after 7-years this regimen has significantly impacted on the life-expectancy of elderly patients with MCL. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Tisi: Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BWS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Nassi: Takeda: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Kyowa Kirin: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy. Ferrero: Gilead: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Morphosys: Research Funding; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Servier: Speakers Bureau; EUSA Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Clinigen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Zilioli: Takeda: Other: travel expenses, accommodation; MSD, Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accommodations; Roche, Italfarmaco: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gentili, Takeda, Gilead, Servier: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Merli: Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accomodations, Expenses; Gilead Science: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accomodations, Expenses; MSD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accomodations, Expenses; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accomodations, Expenses; EUSA Pharma: Other: Travel, Accomodations, Expenses; Celgene: Other: Travel, Accomodations, Expenses.

scholarly journals A Phase 1 Multicenter Open-Label Study of Escalating Doses of the Novel Anti-CD20-Targeting Engineered Toxin Body MT-3724 in Subjects with Relapsed or Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 34-34
Author(s):  
Michael Wang ◽  
Preetesh Jain ◽  
Lei Feng ◽  
Maria Badillo ◽  
Vivian Graham ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Cell Kill ◽  
Anti Cd20

Background: Engineered toxin bodies (ETBs) are comprised of a proprietarily engineered form of Shiga-like toxin A subunit (SLT-A) genetically fused to antibody-like binding domains. ETBs work through novel mechanisms of action and are capable of forcing internalization, self-routing through intracellular compartments to the cytosol, and inducing potent cell-kill via the enzymatic and permanent inactivation by SLT-A of ribosomes. MT-3724 represents a novel ETB modality comprised of an anti-CD20 single-chain variable fragment genetically fused to SLT-A, is capable of efficient internalization once bound to CD20 and can induce potent direct cell-kill via enzymatic ribosome inactivation. In a Phase 1/1b dose escalation/expansion study of MT-3724 monotherapy in subjects with heavily pretreated (including CD20 monoclonal antibodies) relapsed or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (r/rNHL) the most common grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events were myalgia and neutropenia (n=3 each). Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were indicative of innate immune response. In subjects with negative rituximab serum concentrations there was a 38% objective response rate (Hamlin et al. ASH 2019). MT-3724 is currently being studied in five ongoing (three actively recruiting, two in development) Phase 2 studies for r/rNHL. This study will evaluate the safety, tolerability, recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), efficacy, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and immunogenicity of MT-3724 in two cohorts of subjects with r/r mantle cell lymphoma (r/rMCL). Study Design and Methods: This phase 1, multicenter, open-label, single arm study will include adults ≥18 yrs with histologically confirmed r/rMCL (histology plus expression of Cyclin D1 in association with CD20 and CD5 or evidence of t(11:14)) who have received ≥2 prior systemic therapies (including anti-CD20 antibody alone or in combination with other agents) and have ≥1 measurable lesion (Lugano criteria). Subjects with CNS involvement or recent treatment with rituximab (within 84 days of study initiation; if received within 12-37 weeks of start of treatment, serum rituximab level must be confirmed to be negative [<500 ng/mL]), obinutuzumab (within 184 days), or ofatumumab (within 88 days) will be excluded. The washout period for these anti-CD20 antibodies, based on published half-life data for these agents, is required due to direct binding competition with MT-3724 for the same CD20 epitope. The primary objective is to evaluate safety and determine the RP2D of MT-3724 in subjects with r/rMCL. Secondary objectives include overall response rate based on the Lugano criteria as determined by the investigators, duration of response, disease control rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, PK, PD, and immunogenicity. An exploratory endpoint will assess if responders become eligible for potentially curative therapy (rate of bridge-to-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation or bridge-to-chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy). Subjects will receive escalating doses of MT-3724 as a one hr IV infusion in cycle (C) 1 on Days 1, 4, 8, 11, 18, and 25. In C2+, subjects will receive the highest MT-3724 dose on Days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of a 28-day cycle. Two sequential cohorts will be studied. The study will be initiated with Cohort 1 to evaluate DLTs during the first 42 days of therapy. Subjects will have a dose increase only if they do not experience DLTs and dose reductions will be permitted for treatment-related toxicities. If Cohort 1 is deemed tolerable, Cohort 2 (higher doses) will begin; if Cohort 1 dosing is not tolerable, Cohort 0 (lower doses) will begin (Table 1). A Bayesian optimal interval design will be used to identify the RP2D more accurately (target toxicity rate φ=0.3). Enrollment is anticipated to begin in December 2020. Disclosures Wang: Juno:Consultancy, Research Funding;Dava Oncology:Honoraria;Kite Pharma:Consultancy, Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses, Research Funding;InnoCare:Consultancy;MoreHealth:Consultancy;Targeted Oncology:Honoraria;OMI:Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses;Oncternal:Consultancy, Research Funding;Pulse Biosciences:Consultancy;Molecular Templates:Research Funding;OncLive:Honoraria;Verastem:Research Funding;Acerta Pharma:Research Funding;Celgene:Consultancy, Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses, Research Funding;AstraZeneca:Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses, Research Funding;Janssen:Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses, Research Funding;Pharmacyclics:Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses, Research Funding;BioInvent:Research Funding;Guidepoint Global:Consultancy;VelosBio:Research Funding;Loxo Oncology:Consultancy, Research Funding;Lu Daopei Medical Group:Honoraria;Nobel Insights:Consultancy;Beijing Medical Award Foundation:Honoraria.Burnett:Molecular Templates, Inc.:Current Employment.Strack:Molecular Templates, Inc.:Current Employment.

Phase 1 Study of Tazemetostat (EPZ-6438), an Inhibitor of Enhancer of Zeste-Homolog 2 (EZH2): Preliminary Safety and Activity in Relapsed or Refractory Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL) Patients

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 473-473 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincent Ribrag ◽  
Jean-Charles Soria ◽  
Jean-Marie Michot ◽  
Anna Schmitt ◽  
Sophie Postel-Vinay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Somatic Mutations ◽  
Tumor Tissue ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Cell Of Origin ◽  
Advisory Committees

Abstract Introduction: The histone methyl transferase EZH2 is the catalytic subunit of the polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) and responsible for methylation of lysine 27 of histone H3 (H3K27), a modification of DNA associated with repressed transcription when trimethylated (H3K27me3). Aberrant EZH2 activity has been implicated as an oncogenic driver in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Here we report the phase 1 first-in-human experience to date with tazemetostat in patients (pts) with NHL. Methods: Tazemetostat was administered orally twice daily (BID) to subjects in five dose cohorts (100 mg [n=6], 200 mg [n= 3], 400 mg [n=3], 800 mg [n=14], 1600 mg [n=12], and one food effect cohort (400 mg [n=7]). Tumor response assessments were performed every 8 weeks. Archival tumor tissue from NHL pts was analysed for EZH2 hot spot mutations Y646X, A682G and A692V (by either amplicon-based next generation sequencing [NGS] or cobas ® EZH2 Mutation Test [in development]), and for additional somatic mutations by NGS focusing on a panel of 39 genes commonly mutated in NHL. In addition, cell-of-origin in Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) patients was determined by immunohistochemistry on archival tumor tissue using the Hans algorithm (Blood, 2004). Results: As of 9-July 2015, 45 pts were enrolled to this trial (CT.gov: NCT01897571). To date 19 NHL pts: 13 DLBCL, 5 follicular lymphoma (FL) and 1 marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) were enrolled. Results to date on the 26 solid tumor pts have been reported separately (ECC, 2015). Adverse events (AE) occurring in >10% of the 45 pts regardless of attribution were: asthenia, anorexia, constipation, nausea, dysgeusia, vomiting and muscle spasms with 5 grade 3 or greater related AE's: thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, hypertension, anorexia and transaminase elevation. The median age of the NHL patients enrolled was 62 yrs (range 23-82) and 74% of pts were male. Of the fifteen evaluable NHL pts, objective responses were seen in: 5/9 DLBCL, 3/5 FL and 1/1 MZL. The majority of objective responses occurred at the Recommended Phase 2 Dose of 800 mg BID. EZH2 status in patient tumors was determined for 14/19 NHL patients (n=3 data pending, n=2 tissue unavailable) with 13/14 found to be wild-type (WT) and one patient, who experienced an ongoing PR at week 16, expressing an Y646H mutation. Updated data including duration of response will be presented. In addition, 10/13 patients had evidence of somatic mutations in >1 non-EZH2 genes among the 39 genes tested (allelic frequency >10% with coverage >1000X) known to be commonly mutated in NHL, e.g. MYD88 & CARD11, or involved in epigenetic signalling, e.g. EP300 & CREBBP. Table.Relapsed or refractory NHLTotal(n=19)Evaluable(n=15)Best Response CR+PRaBest Response SDaDLBCLGCB4220Non-GCB6520undetermined3210FL5531MZL1110aper IWG (Cheson, 2007), complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) Conclusions: Tazemetostat demonstrates a safety profile favorable for chronic dosing and objective responses in pts with either EZH2 WT or mutant B-cell lymphoma, including both GCB and non-GCB sub-types of DLBCL. EZH2 pathway genes and genes commonly somatically mutated in lymphoma are under investigation to elucidate the mechanisms and biomarkers of clinical response to tazemetostat. Based upon the observed safety and efficacy profile of tazemetostat, a phase 2 trial in relapsed or refractory DLBCL and FL pts, stratified by cell-of-origin and EZH2 mutation status, is enrolling. Disclosures Ribrag: Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Eisai: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Pharmamar: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Thomson:Epizyme, Inc: Employment. Keilhack:Epizyme: Employment, Equity Ownership. Blakemore:Epizyme: Employment. Reyderman:Eisai: Employment. Kumar:Eisai: Employment. Fine:Epizyme: Employment. McDonald:Epizyme: Employment. Ho:Epizyme, Inc: Employment.

scholarly journals Mutations Affecting RNA Binding Proteins Are a Novel Feature of Mantle Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1478-1478
Author(s):  
Krysta M Coyle ◽  
Prasath Pararajalingam ◽  
Sarah E Arthur ◽  
Nicole Thomas ◽  
Miguel Alcaide ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Alternative Splicing ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Mantle Cell

Objectives Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is an uncommon B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma that is incurable with standard therapies. The genetic drivers of this cancer have not been firmly established and the features known to contribute to differences in clinical course remain limited. We sought to extend our understanding of the molecular etiology of this malignancy using an integrative genomic analysis of diagnostic biopsies. Methods We performed exome sequencing on 51 frozen MCL tumors and analyzed these alongside previously published exome cohorts. We sequenced tumour genomes and matched constitutional DNA from 34 frozen MCLs, along with matched constitutional DNA, to more broadly identify the pattern of non-coding mutations. Based on mutations identified in this discovery cohort, we re-sequenced 18 recurrently-mutated genes in 212 archival MCLs, each having clinical follow-up data. We also performed RNA-seq on 110 of these cases and analyzed these data for alternative splicing and differential expression, including the differential splicing of HNRNPH1 in the context of recurrent intronic mutations. We investigated the functional and phenotypic effect of mutations and deregulated HNRNPH1 protein through ectopic expression of full-length HNRNPH1 and a mini-gene containing the exons and introns affected by mutations. Using custom droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assays, we validated alternative splicing patterns in HNRNPH1 itself and other targets identified through re-analysis of available CLIP-seq data. Results In addition to confirming the prognostic association of TP53 and NOTCH1 mutations in MCL, we identified two additional genes associated with outcome: EWSR1 with poor outcome (HR = 5.6) and MEF2B with good outcome (HR = 0.2). By comparing mutation patterns to diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), we identified an MCL-specific missense hot spot in MEF2B, non-specific truncating mutations in EWSR1, and truncating mutations affecting the DAZAP1 C-terminus in both MCL and DLBCL. The DAZAP1 mutations are predicted to alter protein sub-cellular localization and disrupt protein-protein interactions. We also identified the focal recurrence of non-coding mutations surrounding a single exon of the HNRNPH1 gene that were largely restricted to MCL. These mutations affected a region bound by HNRNPH1 protein and disrupted the preferred binding motif of this protein. Intronic mutations were significantly associated with alternative splicing of the HNRNPH1 mRNA and appear to disrupt a negative regulatory loop that normally limits the level of HNRNPH1. Using cell-based assays, we have evaluated the role of HNRNPH1 in cell survival and proliferation. Our interrogation of alternative splicing events in downstream targets implicate HNRNPH1 as a master splicing regulator which may broadly perturb the transcriptome and proteome to favor lymphomagenesis in MCL. Conclusions We discovered three novel MCL-related genes with roles in RNA trafficking or splicing, namely EWSR1, DAZAP1, and HNRNPH1. Mutations in these RNA-binding proteins were identified in 49 of 291 (17%) samples analyzed. Our results improve the current understanding of the MCL mutational landscape, highlight the similarities and differences between MCL and DLBCL, and strongly implicate a role for aberrant regulation of RNA metabolism in MCL pathobiology. We elucidated a functional role for recurrent non-coding HNRNPH1 mutations specific to MCL and identified multiple downstream targets. We continue to explore putative trans targets of HNRNPH1, a novel oncoprotein in MCL. Disclosures Steidl: Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy; Nanostring: Patents & Royalties: Filed patent on behalf of BC Cancer; Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy; Tioma: Research Funding. Connors:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Villa:Roche, Abbvie, Celgene, Seattle Genetics, Lundbeck, AstraZeneca, Nanostring, Janssen, Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria. Johnson:Roche: Consultancy, Employment, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel fees, gifts, and others, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Employment, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; BD Biosciences: Other: Provided a significant proportion of the antibodies used in this project free of cost.; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria; Lundbeck: Employment, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel fees, gifts, and others, Research Funding. Scott:Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; NanoString: Patents & Royalties: Named inventor on a patent licensed to NanoSting [Institution], Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Roche/Genentech: Research Funding.

scholarly journals T-Cell Clonal Expansion and Activation Associated with Durable Clinical Response to Dual BTK and CDK4/6 Inhibitor Therapy in Mantle Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3973-3973
Author(s):  
Christina Y. Lee ◽  
Maurizio Di Liberto ◽  
Yang Hu ◽  
Xiangao Huang ◽  
Nancy L Bartlett ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Progression Of Disease

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is an incurable B-cell lymphoma characterized by the chromosomal translocation (11;14)(q13;q32), resulting in aberrant expression of cyclin D1 and dysregulated cell cycle progression. In a phase I clinical trial in patients with previously treated MCL, the combination of the cyclin-dependent kinase 4 (CDK4)/CDK6 inhibitor palbociclib and the Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor ibrutinib was safe and active. We hypothesized that clinical responses are in part attributed to dynamic changes in the immune landscape and tumor-immune interaction, given accumulating evidence that inhibition of CDK4/6 augments anti-tumor immunity. In a patient (Pt 17) treated with palbociclib and ibrutinib for over 3 years and experiencing a complete response (CR), there was an over 4-fold increase in circulating CD3+ T cells over time. For the first 19 treatment cycles, the absolute CD3+ T cell count was 862 ± 322 compared to 4,027 ± 253 between cycles 31 and 40, with no clinical suspicion of infection for at least 3 months prior. To investigate the T-cell receptor (TCR) repertoire over the course of treatment, high-throughput sequencing of the TCRB CDR3 region was performed, revealing a more oligoclonal repertoire in the peripheral blood over time. The cumulative frequency of the top 10 TCR clones during cycles 3, 7, and 31 were 3.9%, 6.5%, and 25.8%, respectively. These clones were mapped to single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data and determined to be CD8+ effector and central memory T cells. Furthermore, there appears to not only be increased numbers of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells but also enhanced activation as evidenced by scRNA-seq expression of CD69. These findings suggest a predominant cytotoxic T-cell response, which is consistent with recent preclinical studies using CDK4/6 inhibitors. A similar, less dramatic, pattern of T cell expansion was observed in three additional responding patients, including one with non-leukemic MCL (Pt 25) who achieved a CR with subsequent progression of disease at cycle 25. This patient had a 2-fold increase in the absolute number of circulating CD3+ T cells with a baseline count of 442 ± 168 during cycles 1 to 2 compared to 915 ± 104 between cycles 4 and 23, prior to a substantial decrease to 452 during cycle 24 and further to 114 during cycle 25. There was no evidence of clonal T cell expansion in the peripheral blood samples from cycles 4, 20, and 24. Whether this is related to a lack of circulating tumor cells remains to be determined. Interestingly, scRNA-seq analysis revealed a remarkable increase in PDCD1 (encoding PD-1) expression upon disease progression (abstract by Di Liberto et al.). Our findings offer potential new insights into the tumor-immune interaction associated with a durable treatment responses and drug resistance in targeting CDK4/6 and BTK in MCL. In preclinical models, CDK4/6 inhibition has been linked to changes in the tumor microenvironment to enhance the immune response, and here we present the first longitudinal data obtained from patients within the context of a clinical trial. Expansion of the cohort from the ongoing phase II trial, cytokine profiling, and functional assays are underway to further characterize the oligoclonal CD8+ T cell and other immune populations as well as to explore the potential therapeutic role of combinations with immune checkpoint blockade in lymphoma. Figure 1. Differential T-cell responses in relapsed/refractory MCL patients on palbociclib and ibrutinib combination therapy, including a leukemic MCL patient with a CR (Pt 17) and a non-leukemic MCL patient with a CR and subsequent progression of disease (Pt 25). A, Absolute B-cell and T-cell counts during various treatment cycles for Pt 17 (top) and Pt 25 (bottom). B, Cumulative productive frequency of the top 10 clonal TCR rearrangements in a given treatment cycle. C, Change in abundance of the top 10 TCR clones across a given treatment cycle. D, Differential abundance of productive TCR clones that have significantly increased or decreased in frequency between treatment cycles. Abbreviations: CR, complete response. MCL, mantle cell lymphoma. PD, progression of disease. Pt, patient. TCR, T-cell receptor. Figure 1 Disclosures Bartlett: Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Immune Design: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Genentech, Inc.: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Autolus: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Forty Seven: Research Funding. Maddocks:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Teva: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding. Leonard:MorphoSys: Consultancy; Epizyme, Inc: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Bayer Corporation: Consultancy; MorphoSys: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Miltenyi: Consultancy; Nordic Nanovector: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; BeiGene: Consultancy; Nordic Nanovector: Consultancy; Sandoz: Consultancy; Sandoz: Consultancy; Akcea Therapeutics: Consultancy; Miltenyi: Consultancy; Akcea Therapeutics: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Consultancy; Genentech, Inc./F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy; Sutro Biopharma: Consultancy; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Bayer Corporation: Consultancy; Epizyme, Inc: Consultancy; Genentech, Inc./F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy; Sutro Biopharma: Consultancy; BeiGene: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy. Galluzzi:Luke Heller TECPR2 Foundation: Consultancy; Astra Zeneca: Consultancy; Inzen: Consultancy; OmniSEQ: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Martin:I-MAB: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Teneobio: Consultancy; Sandoz: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: Palbociclib, a CDK4/6 inhibitor, was used off-label in combination with ibrutinib in a phase I clinical trial in patients with relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma.

scholarly journals A Phase II, Open-Label, Single Arm Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of the Combination of Tisagenlecleucel and Ibrutinib in Mantle Cell Lymphoma (TARMAC)

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 34-35
Author(s):  
Adrian Minson ◽  
Nada Hamad ◽  
Jason P Butler ◽  
David Alan Westerman ◽  
David Ritchie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Car T ◽  
Mantle Cell

Background Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a clinically and pathogenetically distinct B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma that presents at a median age of 65 years and typically at an advanced stage. High dose chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation can achieve durable responses, but disease eventually relapses in most patients. Allogeneic transplantation can achieve a cure in some but is only suitable for a minority of younger, fitter patients who achieve remission to salvage but carries risks of GVHD. Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi) are active in relapsed MCL but the median PFS is generally less than 2 years and ibrutinib failure is associated with particularly poor outcomes (Cheah et al., Ann Oncol 2015). Mutations of TP53 are associated with refractoriness to both chemotherapy and novel agents (Eskelund et al., Blood 2017), and patients with disease harboring these mutations are in particular need of more effective therapies. Promising activity has recently been demonstrated with chimeric antigen receptor T-cells (CAR T), albeit with significant rates of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity (Wang et al., New England Journal of Medicine 2020), resulting in FDA approval of brexucabtagene autoleucel in MCL. Rationale Tisagenlecleucel (Novartis) is a CAR T-cell product directed against CD19 that is approved in many countries for the treatment of relapsed DLBCL and ALL. MCL consistently expresses CD19 at diagnosis and relapse and is therefore a promising target. Pre-clinical data suggests synergistic effects if tisagenlecleucel is combined with the BTKi ibrutinib. The proposed mechanism includes enhancing T cell activation and expansion (Fraietta et al., Blood 2016), disrupting the MCL nodal environment (Long et al., The Journal of Clinical Investigation 2017) and mitigating CRS (Ruella et al., Clin Cancer Res 2016). Clinical trials in CLL show that the combination is safe and effective, including deep minimal residual disease negative responses (Gill et al., Blood 2018, Gauthier et al., Hematological Oncology 2019). We hypothesise that combination treatment will be tolerable and improve outcomes in a poor risk MCL population. Combination, time-limited therapy would also avoid the burdens of continuous treatment. Study Design and Methods 20 adult patients with MCL that has relapsed following front-line therapy, or those patients with MCL with TP53 aberrations who have achieved less than complete response on PET imaging after 2 cycles of induction will be enrolled (See Fig 1. for inclusion and exclusion criteria). Treatment consists of 560mg oral ibrutinib followed by a single infusion of tisagenlecleucel. Autologous lymphocytes for CAR T manufacture will be collected after a minimum of 7 days of continuous ibrutinib therapy. Ibrutinib will be continued during CAR T manufacture and for 6 months after infusion (see Fig 2.) Patient characteristics will be presented using descriptive statistics, response rates will be calculated as percentages using exact methods from the binomial distribution, and progression-free survival, duration of response and overall survival will be described using the Kaplan-Meier method. The primary objective is to estimate the complete response (CR) rate at month 4 following tisagenlecleucel infusion in combination with ibrutinib with the primary endpoint being CR rates at month 4 post tisagenlecleucel using the Lugano criteria. Secondary objectives include estimating MRD negative response rates, response rates according to TP53 status, and safety of the combination. Exploratory translational studies include studies of T cell repertoire and phenotype during ibrutinib exposure and after tisagenlecleucel infusion. The role of circulating tumour DNA monitoring in the management of MCL is also being evaluated. The trial is investigator led, sponsored by the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, with additional sites throughout Australia. The study was initiated in April 2020 and is actively recruiting patients. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04234061. Disclosures Hamad: Abbvie: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Blombery:Janssen: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy; Invivoscribe: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy. Seymour:Nurix: Honoraria; Morphosys: Consultancy, Honoraria; Mei Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Tam:Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Honoraria; BeiGene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding. Dickinson:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Merck Sharp & Dohme: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: Tisagenlecleucel is not currently approved for use in MCL.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document