scholarly journals Carfilzomib Thalidomide and Dexamethasone Is Safe and Effective in the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Preliminary Outcome from the Open Label Phase II ALLGMM018/AMN003 Study

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1955-1955
Author(s):  
Hang Quach ◽  
Simon J. Harrison ◽  
Slavisa Ninkovic ◽  
Jane Estell ◽  
Noemi Horvath ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
T Cells ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: Carfilzomib lenalidomide and dexamethasone (KRd) is FDA-approved for the treatment relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) based on data from the ASPIRE study (Stewart K et al. NEJM 2015). Thalidomide, a first generation immunomodulatory drug (IMiD) is less costly than lenalidomide and is synergistic in combination with proteasome inhibitors in the treatment of MM. ALLG MM018/ AMN003 is an open label phase II study of carfilzomib thalidomide and dexamethasone (KTd) for patients with RRMM. The primary end point is progression free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints include overall response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), safety and health related quality of life. Method: Eligible patients were those with RRMM who have had 1-3 prior lines of treatment. The KTd regimen consisted of carfilzomib [20mg/m2 IV C1D1 and 2, 56mg/m2 (36mg/m2 for patients age ≥75 years) from C1D8 onwards], thalidomide (100mg po nocte) and dexamethasone [40mg (20mg for patients age ≥75 years) po weekly], in a 28-day cycle. After 12 cycles, thalidomide was omitted and Kd [carfilzomib 56mg/m2 (36/m2 for patients age ≥75 years) on days 1,2,15,16 and dexamethasone 40mg (20mg for patients age ≥75 years) on days 1,15 every 28 days]was continued for a further 6 cycles. Peripheral blood and bone marrow aspirate and trephine for correlative studies were collected from the first 30 patients, at baseline, after cycle 6 and at confirmed disease progression. The aim of the correlative study was to assess for immunological correlates to clinical outcome. Immunological parameters that will be assessed include NK and T cells subsets on peripheral blood via mass cytometry (CyTOF). On the bone marrow trephine, NK cells, T cells, GRP78 expression within CD38 positive plasma cells, PD1 and PDL1 expression will be assessed at the myeloma site and the surrounding microenvironment using OPAL multiplex immunohistochemistry technology. Results: Between March 2017 to June 2018, 56 patients (median age 66 years, range 56-79; 77% Caucasian and 23% Asian) out of the planned 100 were enrolled, with a median follow up of 4.9 (range, 1.0-13.7) months. Response rates in 39 evaluable patients were ≥MR (97%), ≥PR (89%) and ≥VGPR (66%). Median PFS is not reached, and no patients with ≥MR have relapsed. Grade ≥3/4 AEs occurred in 56% of patients, the most common of which were peripheral sensory neuropathy (13%), dyspnoea (13%) and infections (7%). All grade cardiovascular AEs included dyspnoea (27%), cardiac complications (5%), systemic-hypertension (9%) and pulmonary-hypertension (1.9%), however very few were grade ≥3. Three patients have died on study from disease complications, haemorrhage, and primary cardiac ischaemic event. Thus far, we have not found a significant difference in rates or profile of adverse events between the Caucasian versus Asian subgroups of patients. Conclusion: This preliminary analysis demonstrates that the KTd combination is a tolerable regimen for patients with RRMM with a safety profile in line with previous reports for each of carfilzomib and thalidomide. Initial response rates appear very promising and durable with responses up to 13.7 months thus far in some patients. Patient accrual is ongoing. Disclosures Quach: Janssen Cilag: Consultancy; Sanofi Genzyme: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Harrison:Janssen-Cilag: Other: Scientific advisory board. Mollee:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Durie:Takeda: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy. Chng:ASLAN Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Carfilzomib Thalidomide and Dexamethasone Is Safe and Effective in the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: An Open Label Phase II Australasian Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group (ALLG) MM 018/ Asian Myeloma Network (AMN) 002 Study

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 39-40
Author(s):  
Hang Quach ◽  
Simon J Harrison ◽  
Je-Jung Lee ◽  
Nichloas Murphy ◽  
Jae Hoon Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Grade 3

Background: The combination of carfilzomib with immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) and dexamethasone is active in multiple myeloma (MM). Carfilzomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (KTd) has been studied in upfront MM treatment but has not been studied in the setting of relapsed/refractory myeloma (RRMM). The ALLG MM018/ AMN002 is an open-label phase II study of KTd in patients with RRMM. This study was conducted across 16 sites across Australia, New-Zealand, Singapore, South Korea and Taiwan. Method: Patients with RRMM with 1-3 prior lines of treatment were given carfilzomib [K: 20mg/m2 IV cycle 1 days 1 and 2, 56mg/m2 (36mg/m2 for patients age ≥75 years) from cycle 1 day 8 onwards], thalidomide (T: 100mg po nocte) and dexamethasone [dex: 40mg (20mg for patients age ≥75 years) po weekly], in a 28-day cycle. After 12 cycles, T was omitted, and K was given on days 1,2,15,16 and dex days 1,15 every 28-day cycles for a further six cycles. The primary endpoint was PFS. Secondary endpoints were ORR, overall survival, adverse events, and quality of life (QoL). The study had an 80% power to detect a ≥70% PFS at 6.5 months compared to historical ≤50% PFS at 6.5 months expected with Td (Kropff, M. et al. Haematologica 2012), at a significance level of 0.05. Results: This study has completed accrual. Eighty-three patients [median age of 66 years (42-85)] were enrolled with a median follow up of 15.9 (0.9-26) months. ORR rates were 86.4% (≥VGPR 70.2%). Median PFS was 20m (95% CI 15.9-26m). PFS at 6.5 months was 76.2% (95% CI 73.6-84.9%). Median OS has not been reached, and was 75% at 20 months. The most common grade ≥3/4 AEs were peripheral neuropathy (16%), upper respiratory tract infections (12%), dyspnoea (14%), and hypertension (10%). Grade ≥3/4 cardiac AEs occurred in 6%. The median carfilzomib dose that was delivered was 70.7% (32.8-92.6%) of the target dose. Thus far, 41% of patients have completed the intended 18 cycles of treatment. 21% of patients ceased therapy early. The most common reason for early treatment cessation was disease progression (30%) and adverse events (15%). Fifteen patients (18%) have died, 11 were due to MM, two from infection, one from an ischaemic cardiac event, and one from a traffic accident. QoL, as measured by the EQ-5D-5L instrument, remained stable throughout treatment. Conclusion: The ALLG MM018/AMN 002 study has met its primary endpoint. The KTd schedule as outlined in this study is efficacious in patients with RRMM, resulting in a prolonged PFS and a safety profile in line with previous reports for each of carfilzomib and thalidomide. KTd is an active option in jurisdictions where the cost of other IMiDs prohibits regulatory funding. Comparisons of efficacy and adverse events between the Caucasian and Asian populations will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures Quach: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Glaxo Kline Smith: Consultancy, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding. Harrison:Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; CRISPR Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Patents & Royalties: wrt panobinostat; Haemalogix: Consultancy. Augustson:Roche: Other: Support of parent study and funding of editorial support. Campbell:Amgen, Novartis, Roche, Janssen, Celgene (BMS): Research Funding; AstraZeneca, Janssen, Roche, Amgen, CSL Behring, Novartis: Consultancy. Soo:Hanmi: Research Funding. Durie:Amgen, Celgene, Johnson & Johnson, and Takeda: Consultancy.

scholarly journals The MP0250-CP201 Mirror Study: A Phase 2 Study Update of MP0250 Plus Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Relapse/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) Patients Previously Exposed to Proteasome Inhibitors and Immunomodulatory Drugs

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1899-1899 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norbert Grząśko ◽  
Stefan Knop ◽  
Hartmut Goldschmidt ◽  
Marc S Raab ◽  
Jan Dürig ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Proteasome Inhibitors ◽  
Immunomodulatory Drugs ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Phase 2 Study ◽  
Grade 3

Background Bone marrow neovascularization is a hallmark of multiple myeloma and progression is associated with a substantial increase in pro-angiogenic factors that promote bone marrow angiogenesis, including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF-A) and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF). At present, anti-angiogenic agents are not part of treatment strategies in multiple myeloma, neither alone nor in combination with approved agents. MP0250 is a first-in-class, tri-specific multi-DARPin® drug candidate neutralizing VEGF-A and HGF as well as binding to human serum albumin to increase plasma half-life. This is a report on early safety and efficacy of MP0250 in combination with bortezomib plus dexamethasone (Vd) in RRMM patients that have previously been exposed to proteasome inhibitors (PIs) and immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs). Aims To assess the efficacy and safety of MP0250 in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with RRMM (MiRRoR, NCT03136653). Trial Design This trial is recruiting adults ≥18 years of age with RRMM who have progressed after at least two prior treatment regimens including bortezomib and an IMiD. Patients were enrolled to receive iv MP0250 on day 1 + subcutaneous bortezomib 1.3 mg/m² on days 1, 4, 8, 11, oral dexamethasone 20 mg on days 1-2, 4-5, 8-9, 11-12 of each 21-day cycle. Patients will receive treatment until there is documented disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Methods The primary endpoint is efficacy in terms of overall response rate (ORR) per International Myeloma Working Group criteria. Secondary endpoints include safety, immunogenicity, progression-free survival (PFS) and duration of response (DOR). Exploratory endpoints include overall survival, and pharmacokinetics. Exploratory biomarkers for HGF and cMET in bone marrow biopsies are detected by IHC; MM specific markers, circulating HGF and VEGF levels are measured using patient plasma samples. Results As of 01 July 2019, 20 patients (7 ongoing) received a total of 137 doses (1-33 cycles) of MP0250 at the maximum tolerated dose of 8 mg/kg on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle in combination with Vd. Median age was 61 years (46-76), median time since diagnosis was 6.7 years. Median number of prior therapies was 4 (range, 2-9). All 20 patients had prior exposure to IMiDs and PIs and 9 patients received PI-based regimens as their immediate prior line of therapy before start of MP0250 + Vd. Importantly, 6 out of these 9 patients achieved responses ≥ Partial Response (PR). Treatment had been discontinued in 40% of patients due to PD, 15% due to Adverse Event (AE), 5% due to physician's decision and in 1 case at patient's request. The most frequent drug-related grade 3/4 AEs were hypertension in 7/1 patients, thrombocytopenia in 4/1 patients, grade 3 proteinuria in 4 patients and grade 3 anemia in 4 patients. There were no infusion-related reactions. No treatment-related deaths were reported. 20 patients received ≥ 1 dose of MP0250 + Vd and had at least 1 assessment of response and were included in the efficacy analysis. 1 patient (5%) achieved Complete Response, 4 patients achieved Very Good Partial Response (20%) and 3 patients achieved PR (15%) for an ORR of 40%. DOR at cutoff date is 6 months (range, 2-21). Pharmacokinetic data show sustained exposure over multiple cycles with a mean half-life of 11 days (range, 6-17). No indication of ADA-mediated drug clearance was observed. Summary Combining MP250 at 8 mg/kg with standard doses of bortezomib and dexamethasone was generally well tolerated with discontinuation due to AE in only 15% of patients. No unexpected toxicity was observed and AEs consistent with the toxicity profile of the individual agents. Analysis of the preliminary efficacy results showed an encouraging ORR of 40%. Recruitment to this Phase 2 study is ongoing. Disclosures Knop: Janssen, AMGEN, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Goldschmidt:Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; John-Hopkins University: Research Funding; MSD: Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; John-Hopkins University: Research Funding; Chugai: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Dietmar-Hopp-Stiftung: Research Funding; Molecular Partners: Research Funding; Mundipharma: Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Dürig:Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel support; Celgene: Consultancy, Other: Travel or accommodations, Speakers Bureau. Bringhen:Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Gamberi:Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Castellano Acosta:Molecular Partners AG: Employment. Lang:Molecular Partners AG: Employment. Lemaillet:Molecular Partners AG: Employment. Sudhir:Molecular Partners AG: Employment.

scholarly journals A Phase II Study of Pomalidomide, Daily Low Dose Oral Cyclophosphamide, and Dexamethasone in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 4520-4520
Author(s):  
Ajai Chari ◽  
Hearn Jay Cho ◽  
Samir Parekh ◽  
Kenneth Lau ◽  
Gillian Morgan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Metronomic Therapy ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Study Therapy

Abstract Background A treatment option for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) is pomalidomide(pom) and dexamethasone (dex), with an overall response rate (ORR) of 33% and median progression free survival (PFS) of 4.2 months. Adding the alkylatingagent cyclophosphamide(Cy) to pom and steroids improves ORR and PFS. Baz et al (Blood, 26 May 2016) combined daily pom with weekly dosing ofCy anddex (PCD), with an ORR of 64.7% and a median PFS of 9.5 months, although grade 3/4 neutropenia increased from 31% to 52%. In our experience, compared to weekly Cy, low dose daily oral Cy is better tolerated with less myelosuppression. Palumbo et al (Blood, 17 Oct 2013) in fact combined pom with alternate day dosing ofCy and prednisone, with an ORR of 51% and a median PFS of 10.4 months and a grade 3/4 neutropenia rate of 42%. However, importantly, granulocyte stimulating factor (G-CSF) and platelet transfusion support wereprohibited, resulting in a lower maximum tolerated dose of pom of 2.5 mg (vs 4 mg in the Baz) and therefore, the rates of neutropenia cannot be compared between the two studies. In the present study, we explored PCD at the doses/schedule shown in table 1 with hematologic support even in patients with baselinecytopenias. This type of metronomic therapy has demonstrated efficacy in refractory B cell malignancies, possibly because the anti-angiogenic effects of metronomic therapy may be synergetic with conventional anti-neoplastic agents. Methods This was an open label, single arm, and single center phase 2study. The primary objective was to evaluate the best ORR. Secondary objectives were to evaluate safety, clinical benefit response (CBR), PFS, and overall survival (OS). Inclusion criteria included lenalidomide refractory, pom naïve RRMM patients with at least 2 prior lines of therapy. Patients were required to have measurable disease, adequate performance status, Cr <3 mg/dL, normal hepatic function, and ANC > 1000/uL and platelets > 50,000/uL if bone marrow plasma cells were < 50%, otherwise >30,000/uL. G-CSF and platelet support were permitted during screening and study treatment if needed. Each drug was administered at the doses and schedule shown in Table 1. Results Overall, 28 evaluable patients with progressive disease (PD) at screening have been enrolled. The median age is 66 (57% > 65 yr) with a median of 3 lines of prior therapy over 5 years since diagnosis. 3 (11%) had ANC<1.5 and 2 (7%) hadplts<50,000/µL at study entry.High-risk molecular findings were present in 13 patients (46%), including 3 with del p53 and 6 with gain of 1q21 by FISH (2 with concurrentt(4;14) and 2 with concurrent del p53). With 8 patients still on study therapy, responses include 3 complete responses (CR), 7 very good partial responses (VGPR), 9 partial responses (PR), 3 minor responses (MR), 5 stable disease (SD), and 1 PD, for an ORR of 67%, CBR (i.e. MR or better) of 78% and a median PFS of approximately 14.5 months. The median OS has not been reached. The most common grade 3/4 toxicity (regardless of drug attribution) was neutropenia with 20 (71%) of subjects experienced grade 3/4 neutropenia. Importantly, there was only 1 episode of febrile neutropenia during study therapy. Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia was seen in 25% of subjects, and 3/4 anemia seen in 18%. The most common grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicity was pulmonary disease with Grade 3 lung infections occurring in 21% of subjects (3 viral, 2 bacterial, 1 unknown) and 1 additional grade 3 URI. Of note, all of these admissions occurred at local hospitals and none of these occurred in the setting of neutropenia. One additional pt hadpneumonitisattributed to pom requiring study discontinuation. Grade 3rashwas also observed in 14% of subjects leading to pom dose reductions. Correlative data from peripheral blood and bone marrow aspirates taken at baseline, Cycle 3 Day 15, and at disease progression from all patients will be updated at the time of conference. These include PCD-associated changesin gene expression, clonal evolution and immune microenvironment during therapy and on progression. Conclusions With toxicities similar to those in other studies, the ORR of 67% and PFS of 14 months in our study of PCD compares very favorably to pomdexas well as other triplet regimens containingCy. Disclosures Chari: Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Array Biopharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Amgen Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding. Cho:Genentech Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Agenus, Inc.: Research Funding; Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Catamero:Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Verina:Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Jagannath:Bristol Myer Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Clonally Expanded Bone Marrow T Cells Show Effector Differentiation and Rarely Recognize Disease-Associated Antigens in Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 7-7
Author(s):  
Carlotta Welters ◽  
Meng-Tung Hsu ◽  
Christian Alexander Stein ◽  
Livius Penter ◽  
María Fernanda Lammoglia Cobo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Cell Expansion ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Myeloma Cells ◽  
T Cell Expansion

Multiple myeloma is a malignancy of monoclonal plasma cells accumulating in the bone marrow. The critical influence of tumor-infiltrating T cells on disease control and therapeutic responses has been shown in a variety of malignancies, however, the role of multiple myeloma bone marrow-infiltrating T cells is incompletely understood. Although it has been shown that multiple myeloma neo-antigen-specific T cells can be expanded in vitro, little is known about functions and specificities of clonally expanded multiple myeloma-infiltrating bone marrow T cells. Here we asked at the single cell level whether clonally expanded T cells i) were detectable in multiple myeloma bone marrow and peripheral blood, ii) showed characteristic immune phenotypes, and iii) recognized antigens selectively presented on multiple myeloma cells. A total of 6,744 single bone marrow T cells from 13 treatment-naïve patients were index-sorted and sequenced using our methodologies for determination of paired T cell receptor (TCR) αβ sequences along with immune phenotype, transcription factor and cytokine expression. Clonal T cell expansion occurred predominantly within the CD8+ compartment. Phenotypes of clonally expanded T cells were distinctive of cytolytic effector differentiation and significantly different from non-expanded CD8+ T cells. Less than 25% of expanded CD8+ T cell clones expressed the immune checkpoint molecules programmed death-1 (PD-1), cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4), or T cell immunoglobulin and mucin-domain containing-3 (TIM-3), while B and T lymphocyte attenuator (BTLA) was expressed on more than half of the expanded clones. Clonal T cell expansion did not correlate with neo-antigen load as determined by whole exome and RNA sequencing of purified multiple myeloma cells. Furthermore, peripheral blood TCRβ repertoire sequencing from five selected patients with substantial bone marrow T cell expansion identified 90% of expanded bone marrow T cell clones overlapping with peripheral blood. To determine whether clonally expanded bone marrow T cells recognized antigens selectively presented on multiple myeloma cells, 71 dominant TCRs from five selected patients with substantial clonal T cell expansion were re-expressed in 58α-β- T-hybridoma reporter T cells and co-incubated with CD38-enriched multiple myeloma cells from the same patients. Only one of these TCRs recognized antigens selectively presented on multiple myeloma cells and this TCR was not neo-antigen-specific. Hypothesizing that the target antigen was a non-mutated self-antigen, we could show that this TCR also recognized the plasma cell leukemia cell line U-266 in an HLA-A*02:01-restricted manner. In summary, clonally expanded T cells in multiple myeloma bone marrow of newly diagnosed patients show cytolytic effector differentiation. In the majority of patients, clonally expanded bone marrow T cells do not recognize antigens presented on multiple myeloma cells and are not neo-antigen-specific. Our findings are relevant for the design of future therapeutics and clinical trials. The identified TCR, which recognizes a multiple myeloma antigen shared with U-266 in an HLA-A*02:01-restricted manner, could be a promising candidate for T cell therapy. Disclosures Bullinger: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Hexal: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Menarini: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daiichi Sankyo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Safety of Treatment (Tx) with Pomalidomide (POM) and Low-Dose Dexamethasone (LoDEX) in Patients (Pts) with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) and Renal Impairment (RI), Including Those on Dialysis

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 374-374 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karthik Ramasamy ◽  
Meletios A. Dimopoulos ◽  
Niels W.C.J. van de Donk ◽  
Barbara Gamberi ◽  
Frank Bridoux ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Comparable Efficacy ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Modifications ◽  
Support Research

Abstract Background: RI occurs in ≈ 20%-30% of newly diagnosed MM pts and is associated with poor prognosis (Knudsen et al. Eur J Haematol. 2000; Kyle et al. Mayo Clin Proc. 2003). Data from 2 pivotal trials (MM-002, MM-003) suggested comparable efficacy and tolerability of POM + LoDEX in pts with or without moderate RI (Siegel ASH 2012; Weisel ASCO 2013). However, these trials excluded pts with severe RI. MM-013 (NCT02045017) is a European multicenter, open-label phase 2 study designed to assess the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of POM + LoDEX in RRMM pts with moderate or severe RI, including those on dialysis. Methods: The trial is enrolling RRMM pts (N = 80) across 3 cohorts: cohort A (moderate RI, estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] ≥ 30 to < 45 mL/min/1.73 m2, n = 33), cohort B (severe RI without dialysis, eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2, n = 33), and cohort C (severe RI requiring dialysis, n = 14). Pts must have MM-related RI and have received ≥ 1 prior Tx (including lenalidomide). POM 4 mg is administered on days 1-21 of a 28-day cycle and LoDEX 40 mg/day (20 mg for pts aged > 75 yrs) on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 until progressive disease (PD) or unacceptable toxicity. At the time of submission of this abstract, 17 pts terminated Tx; this abstract focuses on tolerability in these pts. Results: This trial is still recruiting; at the time of data cutoff for this abstract, 39 pts were enrolled. Data are included for 17 pts who discontinued Tx. Of all 39 pts, 12 were assigned to cohort A, 18 to cohort B, and 9 to cohort C. The median age of the total population was 72 yrs (range, 52-86 yrs), with 67.7% being male. The median number of prior lines of therapy was 4.0 (3.5 in cohort A, 5.0 in cohort B, and 3.0 in cohort C). This distribution was similar in the 17 pts who discontinued Tx so far (4, 7, and 6 in cohorts A, B, and C, respectively), with a median age of 72 yrs and 58.8% being male. Reasons for discontinuation of Tx were PD (7 pts), adverse events (AEs; 3 pts), death (5 pts: 2 pts due to PD, 2 pts due to infections, 1 pt due to hyperkalemia), and other reasons (2 pts: 1 pt aged 86 yrs with general health problems, 1 pt with increasing RI). Median Tx duration in these pts was 6.9 weeks in cohort A, 12.6 weeks in cohort B, and 12.9 weeks in cohort C. The dosage of POM was reduced to 3 mg in 3 pts (1 patient in each cohort), in all cases due to an AE (thrombocytopenia in 2 pts, pneumonia in 1 pt). However, no further Tx reductions occurred. The most frequent toxicity of any grade in the pts who discontinued was hematologic (82.4% [14 pts]), notably neutropenia in 58.8% (50% in cohort A, 42.9% in cohort B, 83.3% in cohort C), anemia in 52.9% (50% in cohort A, 28.6% in cohort B, 83.3% in cohort C), and thrombocytopenia in 52.9% (75% in cohort A, 14.3% in cohort B, 83.3% in cohort C). Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 47.1%; grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 35.3%. Notably, febrile neutropenia was reported in only 1 pt in cohort A. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was used in 52.9% of pts. Non-hematologic AEs were less frequent. Infections occurred in 7 pts (41.2%), all of which were pulmonary infections, with the exception of 1 case of nasopharyngitis. Asthenia (23.5%) and fatigue (23.5%) occurred predominantly in cohort C. No thromboembolic events or secondary primary malignancies have been reported to date. Conclusions: These data suggest that the combination of POM and LoDEX can be safely administered in pts with RI. A starting dose of POM 4 mg can be used throughout all stages of RI, and the side effects seen in this population have been previously reported with POM use (ie, mainly hematologic events and infections). Rates of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia are similar to reports in a non-RI population. Dose modifications should be considered in pts who develop neutropenia and thrombocytopenia; in pts showing signs of infections, dose interruptions may be considered. Disclosures Off Label Use: Pomalidomide in MM patients with renal insufficiency.. Dimopoulos:Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Genesis: Honoraria; Onyx: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria. van de Donk:Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Gamberi:Celgene Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Mundipharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kueenburg:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria. Rosettani:Celgene Corporation: Employment. Collins:Celgene Corporation: Employment. Lersch:Celgene Corporation: Employment. Bacon:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Weisel:Noxxon: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Support, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Support; Novartis: Other: Travel Support; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Support, Research Funding; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Support. Sonneveld:Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; SkylineDx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Detailed Safety Analysis of Venetoclax Combined with Rituximab in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 2033-2033 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danielle M. Brander ◽  
Michael Y. Choi ◽  
Andrew W. Roberts ◽  
Shuo Ma ◽  
L. Leanne Lash ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Over Time

Abstract Background: Venetoclax (VEN) is a selective, potent, orally bioavailable BCL-2 inhibitor FDA-approved for patients with del(17p) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and who have received ≥1 prior therapy. Based on preclinical evidence of synergy, VEN plus rituximab is being assessed in an ongoing Phase 1b study. Methods: Patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) CLL received daily VEN with stepwise ramp-up over 3-4 weeks to reach daily doses of 200-600mg. After 1 week at the target dose, monthly rituximab was added for 6 doses. Responses and progression were assessed by iwCLL criteria with CT scan and bone marrow biopsy. Bone marrow assessments were done at screening, completion of combination therapy (month 7), and 2 months after clinical/radiologic criteria of iwCLL response were met. Minimal residual disease (MRD) was assessed in peripheral blood and marrow aspirates using ≥4 color flow cytometry (min sensitivity: 0.01%). Data cutoff was 04March2016, with analysis focusing on updated safety of cytopenias experienced on the course of treatment. Results: Forty-ninepatients enrolled (48 CLL/1 SLL). Patients had received a median of 2 prior therapies (range: 1-5) and disease in 25 (51%) was considered refractory to the most recent therapy. Median time on study was 28 (<1-42) months, with 31 patients active on study. Eighteen patients discontinued: 11 due to disease progression, 3 due to toxicity (peripheral neuropathy [1], MDS [1], and death due to TLS [1]), 3 withdrew consent, and 1 was lost to follow up. Across all doses, the most common AEs of any grade were diarrhea (57%), neutropenia (55%), upper respiratory tract infection (55%), and nausea (51%). Peripheral blood cytopenias were the most common Grade 3/4 AEs (neutropenia [53%], thrombocytopenia [16%], anemia [14%], febrile neutropenia [12%], and leukopenia [12%]). Twenty-seven (55%) patients had a history of neutropenia, of whom 6 were receiving G-CSF support prior to starting VEN. Overall, in the first month of therapy, 15 (31%) experienced an AE of neutropenia (any grade). Thereafter, the rate of new AEs of neutropenia decreased over time. While there was individual patient variability, mean ANC was stable over time. Overall, 26 (53%) patients had Grade 3/4 neutropenia. Neutropenia was generally well tolerated and managed by G-CSF support in 24 patients, in addition to ≥1 dose modification in 11 of the 24 patients. Of 8 (16%) patients who experienced grade 3 infections, 2 were while neutropenic. There were no grade 4 infections. Among the 11 (22%) patients who developed any-grade thrombocytopenia, none occurred within 2 weeks of a reported bleeding-related AE. One patient had thrombocytopenia overlapping with disease progression on therapy. Objective response rate for all patients was 86% (n=42), with 51% (n=25) who had complete response (CR/CRi; 12 achieved CR/CRi by month 7). At the completion of combination therapy (month 7), 39 patients had evaluable bone marrow assessments. Thirty (77%) had no histologic evidence of CLL in the bone marrow and 22 patients (56%) had attained bone marrow MRD-negativity. In longer follow up at any point during treatment for all 49 patients, 37 (75%) patients achieved complete marrow clearance and 28 (57%) achieved marrow MRD-negativity. Conclusions: Transient manageable neutropenia was the most common AE, with first onset usually seen within the first month of treatment and the onset of new neutropenia AEs decreased over time. No patients discontinued the study due to cytopenias. Patients were able to continue on study and high rates of response to treatment were observed. VEN given with rituximab achieved rapid and profound reductions in disease burden in peripheral blood and bone marrow. 77% of evaluable patients achieved morphologic clearance by month 7, and 57% were MRD-negative at any point on study. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Brander: TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria. Roberts:AbbVie: Research Funding; Servier: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Genentech: Patents & Royalties: Employee of Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research which receives milestone payments related to venetoclax. Ma:Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Research Funding; Xeme: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding. Lash:AbbVie: Employment. Verdugo:AbbVie: Employment, Other: may own stock. Zhu:AbbVie Inc.: Employment, Other: may own stock. Kim:AbbVie: Employment. Seymour:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Phase 1 Study of Elotuzumab in Combination with Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation and Lenalidomide Maintenance for Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 3448-3448 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keren Osman ◽  
Ajai Chari ◽  
Samir Parekh ◽  
Christine Pun ◽  
Gillian Morgan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Consolidation Therapy ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Myeloma Cells

Abstract Introduction: Elotuzumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody directed against SLAMF7 that is approved for use in relapsed multiple myeloma patients in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone. This agent appears to have several modes of action, including facilitation of antibody-dependent, cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) through binding to SLAMF7 on myeloma cells and activation of natural killer (NK) cells to kill tumor cells through ligation of the target. We initiated a single-center, open label, phase 1 trial based on the hypothesis that the addition of elotuzumab and autologous peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) reconstitution to standard-of-care autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT) and lenalidomide maintenance for consolidation therapy in myeloma patients after induction therapy will be safe and feasible. We hypothesize that early PBMC reconstitution post-auto-SCT will restore a viable NK cell population for activation by elotuzumab, which may target residual myeloma cells and promote tumor-specific humoral and cellular immune responses against myeloma cells. Subsequent maintenance therapy with elotuzumab and lenalidomide may amplify this response, resulting in long-term maintenance of the minimal residual disease state. Methods. This is a Phase 1b, open-label, trial investigating elotuzumab and autologous PBMC reconstitution with auto-SCT consolidation therapy and lenalidomide maintenance. The primary objective of this study is to assess the safety and tolerability of elotuzumab and autologous PBMC reconstitution in the setting of auto-SCT and lenalidomide maintenance in multiple myeloma patients. The secondary objectives are to assess myeloma disease status and progression-free survival (PFS) after one year of treatment. Subjects must achieve partial response or better by IMWG criteria with induction chemotherapy, be eligible for auto-SCT by institutional standards, and meet inclusion/exclusion criteria. Fifteen subjects are planned in this pilot study. The treatment plan is as follows: In addition to standard peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and harvest, subjects undergo steady-state leukopheresis for PBMC collection. Subjects receive standard melphalan conditioning (day -1) and autologous stem cell rescue (day 0). Autologous PBMC are reinfused on day +3 post-stem cell infusion and cycle 1 of elotuzumab 20 mg/kg IV is given on day +4. Subjects receive subsequent cycles of elotuzumab every 28 days up to cycle 12. Lenalidomide maintenance at 10 mg orally daily days 1-21 of every 28-day cycle begins with cycle 4 of elotuzumab, and may continue off study beyond cycle 12 at the investigator's discretion. Bone marrow aspirates and peripheral blood are collected for correlative studies at screening, cycle 2, cycle 4, and at the end of study after cycle 12. For the primary endpoint analysis, the safety population includes all subjects who received at least one dose of study treatment. The evaluable population constitutes all subjects who received at least four of the first five planned doses of elotuzumab. Results: Fourteen of the planned 15 subjects have been enrolled in the study. Demographic and staging data reflect the general transplant-eligible myeloma patient population at our institution. All 14 of these subjects are included in the safety population, having received at least 1 dose of elotuzumab. Nine of 14 subjects have completed at least 4 of the first 5 planned elotuzumab infusions and are evaluable. The majority of adverse events, including infusion reactions attributable to elotuzumab, have been grade 2 or lower. Grade 3 or higher hematologic AEs, including anemia, neutropenia, lymphopenia, thrombocytopenia, and non-hematologic AEs including nausea, vomiting, and dehydration, were attributable to the auto-SCT procedure. There were no delays in hematopoietic reconstitution observed. One episode of grade 3 hypertension was attributed to elotuzumab infusion and resolved with supportive care. No AEs were attributed to PBMC reconstitution. Conclusions: The combination of elotuzumab and PBMC reconstitution with standard auto-SCT and lenalidomide maintenance for consolidation therapy of multiple myeloma appears to be safe and feasible. One subject withdrew for personal reasons. The trial is ongoing and is expected to complete accrual and the clinical results will be updated for presentation. Disclosures Chari: Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Array Biopharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding. Geerlof:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Employment. Jagannath:Novartis: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy. Cho:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Agenus, Inc.: Research Funding; Genentech Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Mass Cytometry Identifies Immunomic Shifts in the Bone Marrow Microenvironment of Multiple Myeloma and Light Chain Amyloidosis after Standard of Care First Line Therapies

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1879-1879 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taxiarchis Kourelis ◽  
Jose C Villasboas ◽  
Surendra Dasari ◽  
Angela Dispenzieri ◽  
Shaji K. Kumar
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
T Cells ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Cd8 T Cells ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Mass Cytometry ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Healthy Donors

Abstract INTRODUCTION: Traditional cytometry methods have been unable to capture the immense heterogeneity of the tumor immune microenvironment in various malignancies including multiple myeloma (MM). Cytometry by time of flight (CyTOF) can, to some extent, overcome this limitation. However, the computational challenges that come with analyzing these complex datasets in a reproducible manner remain. In this study, using a large cohort of patients, we compare the bone marrow immunomes from patients with MGUS, multiple myeloma (MM), smoldering MM (SMM) and light chain amyloidosis (AL) at diagnosis, after induction therapy with lenalidomide and dexamethasone and after autologous transplant (ASCT). METHODS: We studied a total of 118 cryopreserved samples as follows: 14 healthy donors, 43 AL (27 newly diagnosed-ND, of which 13 with <10% bone marrow plasma cells, 16 matched samples post ASCT), 12 with ND MGUS, 11 with SMM (of which 6 were ND), 14 with ND MM, 13 paired MM samples post induction therapy and 11 paired MM samples post ASCT. Our CyTOF surface staining panel included the following 33 markers: CD45, HLA-DR, CD19, CD3, CD4, CD8, CD14, CCR6, CD11a, Cd123, CCR5, CD7, ICOS, CD25, CD57, CD45RA, CD163, PD-1, PDL-1, CXCR3, CCR4, CCR7, CD28, CTLA4, CD11c, CD56, CD45RO, CD44, CD27, CD138, CD38, CD-127 and CD16. Data processing and analysis was performed using Cytobank. Live cells were identified based on Pt195 and Ir193 staining. Myeloma cells and CD45- cells were excluded and only CD45+ cells were used for subsequent analyses. Single-cell data were downsampled using VisNE, a permutation of t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (tSNE) and clustered using CITRUS (using 10,000 events per sample with a minimum cluster size of 1%). A Significance analysis of microarrays (SAM) analysis was performed to ascertain differences between groups. Significance was inferred for a false discovery rate <1% . All CITRUS analyses were repeated at least 3 times and only clusters found to differ consistently across runs were considered. RESULTS: The proportions of immune subsets identified to vary by CITRUS before and after induction therapy and ASCT for MM and AL are shown in the table. No differences were identified between MGUS, SMM and NDMM. The proportion of a subset (369850) of CD14+/C16- monocytes, a group of cells shown to correlate positively with survival and response to therapy in solid malignancies, increased after induction therapy in MM. Naïve B cells increased dramatically post ASCT in both AL (429918) and MM (369948), consistent with expected immune reconstitution patterns, although a CCR6+ B Cell subset (429940) shown to mediate effective antibody responses, decreased (in grey). A subset (369980) of functionally exhausted (PD1/CTLA4+) central memory (CM) CD4 T cells decreased after induction therapy in MM but recovered early post ASCT whereas a CM CD4+ subset (369986) lacking major activation markers (CD28, CD25) decreased gradually with therapy and post ASCT. A subset (369953) of naïve CD8 T cells shown to be actively recruited in tumor sites (CXCR3+) decreased after ASCT. CD57+ senescent effector memory (EM) CD8 T cells (369962) decreased with induction therapy but recovered post ASCT. EM CD8 T cells associated with long term immune memory (CCR5+, CD127+, cluster 369959), also decreased after ASCT. LIMITATIONS: Include a) No barcoding b) batch effects were difficult to avoid when processing large number of samples c) use of cryopreserved samples d) need for downsampling to cope with the computational burden. The latter could have been one of the reasons we did not identify any differences between MGUS, SMM and MM. At the time of the meeting we will present confirmatory analyses using conceptually different methods of clustering and of performing across group comparisons as well as analyses that do not include downsampling. CONCLUSIONS: Mass cytometry can provide a more granular view of the bone marrow immunome in plasma cell dyscrasias. Novel agent induction therapy can create an immunologically favorable anti-tumor microenvironment although, in some cases, these favorable immunomic shifts are temporarily reversed by ASCT. Confirmatory analyses, baseline immune profiles, comparisons with healthy donors and correlation with other clinically relevant patient characteristics and outcomes will be reported at the meeting. Disclosures Dispenzieri: Celgene, Takeda, Prothena, Jannsen, Pfizer, Alnylam, GSK: Research Funding. Kumar:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; KITE: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Open-Label Pilot Study of Genetically Engineered NY-ESO-1 Specific T Cells (GSK3377794) Alone or in Combination with Pembrolizumab in Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3134-3134
Author(s):  
Taiga Nishihori ◽  
Jonathan L. Kaufman ◽  
James E. Hoffman ◽  
Kristin Blouch ◽  
Sunil Pandit ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
T Cells ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Treatment Phase ◽  
Single Infusion ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership

Background: Emerging clinical data demonstrate that adoptive cellular therapy has potential to be practice-changing in the management of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM). NY-ESO-1 TCR T (GSK3377794) are autologous polyclonal T cells transduced by a self-inactivating lentiviral vector to express an affinity-enhanced TCR capable of recognizing NY-ESO-1 or LAGE-1a antigenic peptides in complex with HLA-A2. In prior studies, encouraging clinical activity has been observed with GSK3377794 treatment in patients with synovial sarcoma, melanoma, myxoid/round cell liposarcoma, and in MM patients receiving GSK3377794 after autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). NY-ESO-1 and LAGE-1a are immunogenic cancer/testis antigens frequently overexpressed in MM and are linked to poor clinical outcome. While a number of phase 1 and 2 trials are evaluating GSK3377794 in solid tumors, this abstract presents a trial in progress aiming to evaluate safety and efficacy of GSK3377794 alone or in combination with the anti-PD1 inhibitor, pembrolizumab, in patients with MM. PD-1 expression on CD8 T cells has been observed in MM patients previously treated with GSK3377794 and can limit adaptive immune response. This has also been described as a mechanism of resistance and relapse in CD19 CAR T-cell trials (Fraietta et al, Nat Med 2018). Thus, we hypothesize that combining GSK3377794 and pembrolizumab may result in a synergistic antitumor effect. Study design and methods: This is an open-label, pilot study (NCT03168438) of GSK3377794 in patients who are HLA-A*02:01, HLA-A*02:05, and/or HLA-A*02:06 positive and have NY-ESO-1/LAGE-1a positive relapsed/refractory MM. Twenty patients who have received at least three prior therapies containing at least one of the following drug classes as separate or combined lines of therapy (including ASCT): an immunomodulatory imide, proteasome inhibitor, alkylator, CD38 monoclonal antibody, and glucocorticoid, will be assigned to one of two arms: GSK3377794 alone as a single infusion (Arm 1, n=10) or GSK3377794 as a single infusion in combination with pembrolizumab 200 mg IV every 3 weeks (Arm 2, n=10). Enrollment of Arm 1 will be completed before enrolling subjects to Arm 2. Administration of pembrolizumab will start from Week 3 (or Week 6 if toxicities preclude Week 3 treatment). Patients will undergo leukapheresis to obtain cells for the manufacture of autologous NY-ESO-1-specific T cells. Each patient will then undergo lymphodepleting chemotherapy with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide followed by GSK3377794 infusion of 1−8x109 transduced T cells. Primary and secondary objectives are to assess safety and tolerability, and antitumor activity, respectively, of GSK3377794 treatment (with and without pembrolizumab). Patients will be monitored for adverse events and combination-related treatment-limiting toxicities; efficacy will be assessed using International Myeloma Working Group Response Criteria (Rajkumar et al, Blood 2011). In Arm 2, enrollment will be temporarily paused for a 3-week safety review period after the first 3 patients have received their first dose of pembrolizumab. Efficacy, safety, and biomarker assessments will be conducted at each visit. Patients will complete the treatment phase upon progression of disease or 108 weeks after GSK3377794 infusion. After completion of the treatment phase, patients will transfer to the long-term follow-up study (NCT03391778) to continue safety and survival monitoring for up to 15 years. As of January 27, 2019, 50 patients have undergone screening for HLA status and NY-ESO-1/LAGE-1a antigen expression. Among 50 patients screened for HLA, 25 (50%) tested positive for HLA-A*02:01, 05, and/or 06. Of these patients, bone marrow samples from 12/21 (57%) tested positive for NY-ESO-1, LAGE-1a, or both, illustrating high expression of this antigen in MM. To date, 3 patients have been treated with GSK3377794, demonstrating feasibility of identifying and treating HLA/antigen-positive patients with relapsed/refractory MM. Further work is underway towards introducing flexibility in screening procedures in order to permit wider screening of patients and to minimize time between screening and leukapheresis and for cell manufacturing, which will enhance patient eligibility. Acknowledgment: Medical writing support by O Conn PhD of Fishawack Indicia Ltd, funded by GSK. This study (NCT03168438) is funded by GSK. Disclosures Nishihori: Karyopharm: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Kaufman:Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University: Employment; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Blouch:GSK: Employment, Equity Ownership. Pandit:GSK: Employment, Equity Ownership. Butler:GSK: Employment, Equity Ownership. Jain:GSK: Employment. Wu:GSK: Employment, Equity Ownership. DeYoung:GSK: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hasan:GSK: Employment, Equity Ownership; Atara Biotherapeutics: Patents & Royalties; Merck: Equity Ownership.

scholarly journals Normalization of the Immune Microenvironment during Lenalidomide Maintenance Is Associated with Sustained MRD Negativity in Patients with Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 329-329
Author(s):  
David G. Coffey ◽  
Francesco Maura ◽  
Edgar Gonzalez-Kozlova ◽  
Javier Diaz-Mejia3 ◽  
Ping Luo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
T Cells ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Immune Cell ◽  
Immune Microenvironment ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Cellular And Humoral Immunity

Abstract Background: The progression of multiple myeloma (MM) during ongoing therapy is driven by a complex interplay between tumor cells and their surrounding immune microenvironment. We were motivated to conduct a comprehensive and orthogonal investigation of the cellular and humoral immunity of patients with MM treated with lenalidomide maintenance therapy. We compared patients who achieved sustained minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity during the first year of maintenance therapy to those who lost or were unable to attain an MRD negative state. Methods: As part of our prospective phase II clinical trial designed to investigate the MRD dynamics and the efficacy of continuous lenalidomide maintenance in MM (NCT02538198, Lancet Haematology 2021; 8:e422-32), we conducted a pre-planned correlative investigation to elucidate the roles of cellular and humoral immunity. We leveraged single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) coupled with V(D)J sequencing of peripheral blood mononuclear cells and CyTOF mass cytometry of bone marrow samples collected before and approximately one year after starting maintenance therapy (median 342 days). Proteomic analysis of 92 immuno-oncology related proteins within bone marrow plasma was performed using Olink. Reference-based mapping was used to perform automated cell classification of 31 immune cell subtypes using scRNAseq. A custom 38-marker panel enabled the identification of 21 immune cell subtypes by CyTOF. A total of 40 peripheral blood samples from 20 patients were analyzed by scRNAseq, 28 bone marrow aspirates from 14 patients were analyzed by CyTOF, and 34 plasma samples from 16 patients were analyzed by Olink. Results: Prior to maintenance therapy, 11 (46%) patients completed planned induction therapy and high-dose melphalan (HDM) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT); 13 (54%) received planned induction therapy without HDM-ASCT. Through the integration of scRNAseq and CyTOF by bioinformatic analyses, we were able to characterize the cellular composition and phenotypic states of the immune microenvironment before maintenance therapy and after exposure to lenalidomide. Profound and sustained immunosuppression was observed among patients exposed to HDM-ASCT, which associated with accelerated seeding of MM recurrence (Nature Communications 2020;11:3617). Independent of prior exposure to HDM-ASCT, we found differential abundance of immune cell composition to be associated with sustained versus unsustained MRD negativity. Additionally, patients who achieved and sustained MRD negativity (compared to patients with unsustained MRD negativity) had increased frequency of circulating naïve CD8+ T cells in their baseline sample, as well as elevated levels of circulating naïve CD4+ T cells during therapy. When investigating the dynamics of the immune microenvironment longitudinally, circulating regulatory T cells were found to increase during maintenance therapy among patients who had early progression. In the bone marrow, NK cells were more abundant in patients who achieved but could not sustain MRD negativity while vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) levels were increased in patients with sustained MRD negativity. We compared our results to a separate report describing the immune microenvironment in patients with MM and healthy donors (Zavidij et al. Nature Cancer 2020;1:493-506) and found the immune landscape of MM patients with sustained MRD negativity to gradually normalize. In contrast, immunosuppression remained present at baseline and during follow-up in MM patients with unsustained MRD negativity. Conclusions: Our findings represent the first detailed characterization of the longitudinal dynamics of the immune microenvironment in relation to low-burden disease in patients with MM treated with lenalidomide maintenance therapy. As expected, HDM-ASCT exposure translated into long-term cellular and humoral immunosuppression, which correlated with dynamics of MM recurrence. Independent of the profound impact of HDM-ASCT on host immunity, the composition of the immune microenvironment varied according to the depth of response. Patients with unsustained MRD negativity had hallmarks of immune dysregulation at baseline and during lenalidomide maintenance, while those who achieved and sustained MRD negativity showed gradual normalization of the immune microenvironment. Disclosures Maura: Medscape: Consultancy, Honoraria; OncLive: Honoraria. Smith: BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties: CAR T cells for MM; Sanofi: Patents & Royalties: GPRC5D antibody based therapies; Novarits: Consultancy; Chimeric Therapeutics: Consultancy; Fate Therapeutics: Research Funding; Eureka Therapeutics: Consultancy. Lesokhin: bristol myers squibb: Research Funding; Genetech: Research Funding; Trillium Therapeutics: Consultancy; pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Serametrix, Inc: Patents & Royalties; Behringer Ingelheim: Honoraria; Iteos: Consultancy. Kazandjian: Arcellx: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Green: Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Cellectar Biosciences: Research Funding; GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; JANSSEN Biotech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Juno Therapeutics: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Legend Biotech: Consultancy; Neoleukin Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; SpringWorks Therapeutics: Research Funding. Landgren: Celgene: Research Funding; Janssen: Other: IDMC; Janssen: Honoraria; Janssen: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; Amgen: Research Funding; Takeda: Other: IDMC; GSK: Honoraria.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document