scholarly journals Mass Cytometry Identifies Immunomic Shifts in the Bone Marrow Microenvironment of Multiple Myeloma and Light Chain Amyloidosis after Standard of Care First Line Therapies

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1879-1879 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taxiarchis Kourelis ◽  
Jose C Villasboas ◽  
Surendra Dasari ◽  
Angela Dispenzieri ◽  
Shaji K. Kumar
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
T Cells ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Cd8 T Cells ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Mass Cytometry ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Healthy Donors

Abstract INTRODUCTION: Traditional cytometry methods have been unable to capture the immense heterogeneity of the tumor immune microenvironment in various malignancies including multiple myeloma (MM). Cytometry by time of flight (CyTOF) can, to some extent, overcome this limitation. However, the computational challenges that come with analyzing these complex datasets in a reproducible manner remain. In this study, using a large cohort of patients, we compare the bone marrow immunomes from patients with MGUS, multiple myeloma (MM), smoldering MM (SMM) and light chain amyloidosis (AL) at diagnosis, after induction therapy with lenalidomide and dexamethasone and after autologous transplant (ASCT). METHODS: We studied a total of 118 cryopreserved samples as follows: 14 healthy donors, 43 AL (27 newly diagnosed-ND, of which 13 with <10% bone marrow plasma cells, 16 matched samples post ASCT), 12 with ND MGUS, 11 with SMM (of which 6 were ND), 14 with ND MM, 13 paired MM samples post induction therapy and 11 paired MM samples post ASCT. Our CyTOF surface staining panel included the following 33 markers: CD45, HLA-DR, CD19, CD3, CD4, CD8, CD14, CCR6, CD11a, Cd123, CCR5, CD7, ICOS, CD25, CD57, CD45RA, CD163, PD-1, PDL-1, CXCR3, CCR4, CCR7, CD28, CTLA4, CD11c, CD56, CD45RO, CD44, CD27, CD138, CD38, CD-127 and CD16. Data processing and analysis was performed using Cytobank. Live cells were identified based on Pt195 and Ir193 staining. Myeloma cells and CD45- cells were excluded and only CD45+ cells were used for subsequent analyses. Single-cell data were downsampled using VisNE, a permutation of t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (tSNE) and clustered using CITRUS (using 10,000 events per sample with a minimum cluster size of 1%). A Significance analysis of microarrays (SAM) analysis was performed to ascertain differences between groups. Significance was inferred for a false discovery rate <1% . All CITRUS analyses were repeated at least 3 times and only clusters found to differ consistently across runs were considered. RESULTS: The proportions of immune subsets identified to vary by CITRUS before and after induction therapy and ASCT for MM and AL are shown in the table. No differences were identified between MGUS, SMM and NDMM. The proportion of a subset (369850) of CD14+/C16- monocytes, a group of cells shown to correlate positively with survival and response to therapy in solid malignancies, increased after induction therapy in MM. Naïve B cells increased dramatically post ASCT in both AL (429918) and MM (369948), consistent with expected immune reconstitution patterns, although a CCR6+ B Cell subset (429940) shown to mediate effective antibody responses, decreased (in grey). A subset (369980) of functionally exhausted (PD1/CTLA4+) central memory (CM) CD4 T cells decreased after induction therapy in MM but recovered early post ASCT whereas a CM CD4+ subset (369986) lacking major activation markers (CD28, CD25) decreased gradually with therapy and post ASCT. A subset (369953) of naïve CD8 T cells shown to be actively recruited in tumor sites (CXCR3+) decreased after ASCT. CD57+ senescent effector memory (EM) CD8 T cells (369962) decreased with induction therapy but recovered post ASCT. EM CD8 T cells associated with long term immune memory (CCR5+, CD127+, cluster 369959), also decreased after ASCT. LIMITATIONS: Include a) No barcoding b) batch effects were difficult to avoid when processing large number of samples c) use of cryopreserved samples d) need for downsampling to cope with the computational burden. The latter could have been one of the reasons we did not identify any differences between MGUS, SMM and MM. At the time of the meeting we will present confirmatory analyses using conceptually different methods of clustering and of performing across group comparisons as well as analyses that do not include downsampling. CONCLUSIONS: Mass cytometry can provide a more granular view of the bone marrow immunome in plasma cell dyscrasias. Novel agent induction therapy can create an immunologically favorable anti-tumor microenvironment although, in some cases, these favorable immunomic shifts are temporarily reversed by ASCT. Confirmatory analyses, baseline immune profiles, comparisons with healthy donors and correlation with other clinically relevant patient characteristics and outcomes will be reported at the meeting. Disclosures Dispenzieri: Celgene, Takeda, Prothena, Jannsen, Pfizer, Alnylam, GSK: Research Funding. Kumar:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; KITE: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Phase 1/2 Study of Nexi-001 Donor-Derived Multi-Antigen Specific CD8+ T Cells for the Treatment of Relapsed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Transplantation

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4819-4819
Author(s):  
Monzr M. Al Malki ◽  
Sumithira Vasu ◽  
Dipenkumar Modi ◽  
Miguel-Angel Perales ◽  
Lucy Y Ghoda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Cd8 T Cells ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Over Time

Abstract Patients who relapse after allogeneic HCT have a poor prognosis and few effective treatment options. Responses to salvage therapy with donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) are driven by a graft versus leukemia (GvL) effect. However, relapses and moderate to severe graft versus host disease (GVHD) are common. Therapies that increase the GvL effect without inducing GVHD are needed. The NEXI-001 study is a prospective, multicenter, open-label phase 1/2 trial designed to characterize the safety, immunogenic, and antitumor activity of the NEXI-001 antigen specific T-cell product. This product is a donor-derived non-genetically engineered therapy that consists of populations of CD8+ T cells that recognize HLA 02.01-restricted peptides from the WT1, PRAME, and Cyclin A1 antigens. These T cells consist of populations with key memory phenotypes, including stem-like memory, central memory, and effector memory cells, with a low proportion (&lt;5%) of potentially allogeneic-reactive T-naïve cells. Patients enrolled into the first cohort of the dose escalation phase received a single infusion of 50 million (M) to 100M cells of the NEXI-001 product. Bridging anti-AML treatment was permitted during the manufacture of the cellular product with a wash-out period of at least 14 days prior to lymphodepletion (LD) chemotherapy (intravenous fludarabine 30 mg/m 2 and cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m 2) that was administered on Days -5, -4, and -3 prior to the infusion of the NEXI-001 product up to 72 hours later (Day1). Lymphocyte recovery to baseline levels occurred as early as three days after the NEXI-001 product infusion with robust CD4 and CD8 T cell reconstitution after LD chemotherapy. NEXI-001 antigen specific T cells were detectable in peripheral blood (PB) by multimer staining and were found to proliferate over time and to traffic to bone marrow. The phenotype composition of detectable antigen specific T cells at both sites was that of the infused product. T-cell receptor (TCR) sequencing assays revealed T cell clones in the NEXI-001 product that were not detected in PB of patients tested at baseline. These unique clones subsequently expanded in PB and bone marrow (BM) and persisted over time. Neutrophil recovery, decreased transfusion burden of platelets and red blood cells, and increased donor chimerism were observed. Decreases in myeloblasts and reduction in the size of an extramedullary myeloid sarcoma were suggestive of clinical activity. One patient, a 23-year- old with MRD+ disease at baseline, received two doses of 200M NEXI-001 cells separated by approximately 2 months. Following the first infusion, antigen specific CD8+ T cells increased gradually in PB to 9% of the total CD3+ T cell population just prior to the second infusion and were found to have trafficked to bone marrow. By Day 2 following the second infusion, which was not preceded by LD chemotherapy, the antigen specific CD8+ T cells again increased to 9% of the total CD3+ T cell population in PB and remained at ≥5% until the end of study visit a month later. The absolute lymphocyte count increased by 50% highlighting continued expansion of the NEXI-001 T cells. These cells also maintained significant Tscm populations. Treatment related adverse events, including infusion reactions, GVHD, CRS, and neurotoxicity (ICANS), have not developed in these patients who have received 50M to 200M T cells of the NEXI-001 product either as single or repeat infusions. In conclusion, these results show that infusion of the NEXI-001 product is safe and capable of generating a cell-mediated immune response with early signs of clinical activity. A second infusion is associated with increasing the level of antigen specific CD8+ T cells and their persistence in PB and BM. TCR sequencing and RNA Seq transcriptional profiling of the CD8+ T cells are planned, and these data will be available for presentation during the ASH conference. At least two cycles of 200M NEXI-001 cells weekly x 3 weeks of a 4-week cycle is planned for the next dose-escalation cohort. Early data suggest that the NEXI-001 product has the potential to enhance a GvL effect with minimal GVHD-associated toxicities. Disclosures Al Malki: Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy; Neximmune: Consultancy; Hansa Biopharma: Consultancy; CareDx: Consultancy; Rigel Pharma: Consultancy. Vasu: Boehringer Ingelheim: Other: Travel support; Seattle Genetics: Other: travel support; Kiadis, Inc.: Research Funding; Omeros, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Modi: MorphoSys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seagen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Research Funding. Perales: Sellas Life Sciences: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Other; Omeros: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria, Other; Equilium: Honoraria; MorphoSys: Honoraria; Kite/Gilead: Honoraria, Other; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Medigene: Honoraria; NexImmune: Honoraria; Cidara: Honoraria; Nektar Therapeutics: Honoraria, Other; Servier: Honoraria; Miltenyi Biotec: Honoraria, Other. Edavana: Neximmune, Inc: Current Employment. Lu: Neximmune, Inc: Current Employment. Kim: Neximmune, Inc: Current Employment. Suarez: Neximmune, Inc: Current Employment. Oelke: Neximmune, Inc: Current Employment. Bednarik: Neximmune, Inc: Current Employment. Knight: Neximmune, Inc: Current Employment. Varela: Kite: Speakers Bureau; Nexlmmune: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Expression of S100A9 in Bone Marrow Cells Differentiates Refractory Cytopenia with Multilineage Dysplasia (RCMD) from Refractory Anemia with Excess Blasts (RAEB) and Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 4303-4303 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Brent Ferrell ◽  
Caroline R. Maier ◽  
Mikael Roussel ◽  
Michael R. Savona ◽  
Jonathan Michael Irish
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
T Cells ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Bone Marrow Cells ◽  
Myeloid Cells ◽  
Mass Cytometry ◽  
Immune Microenvironment ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Marrow Cells

Abstract Introduction: Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is a heterogeneous group of bone marrow disorders with a yearly incidence of approximately 13,000 in the United States. It has been observed that both genetic mutations within stem and progenitor cells and a disordered immune microenvironment are present early in MDS. Abnormal levels of inflammatory cytokines as well increased numbers of suppressive cell types, such as regulatory T cells and myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSC) have been noted in MDS bone marrow. MDSC are recently discovered subset of myeloid cells with specific immune regulatory functions, such as T cells suppression, seen in pathological conditions, such as cancer. Recent data suggest MDSC may play a critical role in MDS pathogenesis, and that S100A9, a danger-associated molecular pattern (DAMP) produced by some myeloid cells, including neutrophils, monocytes and MDSC, is a key signal for bone marrow immune dysregulation. Here, we report a systems immunology approach to cell type discovery within MDS bone marrow using high dimensional mass cytometry. Methods: Bone marrow aspirate samples with informed consent from MDS (n=19) and AML (n=4) patients were collected and cryopreserved following red blood cell lysis for storage by the Vanderbilt Hematology Tissue Repository, a tissue repository approved by the local Institutional Review Board (IRB). Samples were acquired for the study and stained with a 35-marker panel of metal tagged mass cytometry antibodies and analyzed with a mass cytometer (CyTOF). Cellular populations were then characterized using biaxial gating as well as viSNE, SPADE and hierarchical clustering as has been previously reported (Diggins et al. Methods 2015, Ferrell et al. PLoS One, 2016). Results: Unsupervised viSNE analysis of 35-markers per cell revealed distinct cellular subsets within each sample. Interestingly, one of the strongest marker signals was expression of S100A9, which was seen in multiple cells types including phenotypic MDSC. Further analysis revealed that as a percentage of bone marrow cells, S100A9 expression was significantly more common in RCMD vs. RAEB and AML (30.0% (n=10) vs. 10.9% (n=9) and 2.4% (n=4), respectively, p<0.05 for each comparison) (Figure 1A). Additionally, three paired RCMD/AML samples were available for analysis. Within these patients, the percentage of S100A9+ cells dropped from a mean of 41.7% in RCMD to a mean of 1.84% in AML bone marrow (Figure 1B&C). Conclusion: S100A9 is both a distinguishing feature of RCMD and of disease progression within MDS. Because of its important role inflammation and cellular recruitment, S100A9 may correlate with bone marrow cellular inflammation and could represent a viable target in treatment of the disordered immune microenvironment present in MDS, especially RCMD. Disclosures Savona: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sunesis: Research Funding; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Ariad: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Irish:Incyte: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Cytobank, Inc.: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Myeloid Derived Suppressor Cells (MDSCs) Regulate Tumor Growth, Immune Response and Regulatory T Cell (Treg) Development in the Multiple Myeloma Bone Marrow Microenvironment

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 565-565
Author(s):  
Gullu Topal Gorgun ◽  
Gregory Whitehill ◽  
Jennifer Lindsey Anderson ◽  
Teru Hideshima ◽  
Jacob P. Laubach ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Cell Lines ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Tumor Development ◽  
Suppressor Cells ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Healthy Donors

Abstract Abstract 565 Background: The interaction of myeloma (MM) cells with bone marrow accessory cells induces genomic, epigenomic and functional changes which promote tumor development, progression, cell adhesion mediated-drug resistance (CAM-DR), and immune suppression. As in other cancers, bidirectional interaction between MM cells and surrounding cells regulates tumor development on the one hand, while transforming the BM microenvironment into a tumor promoting and immune suppressive milieu on the other. Recent developments in targeted therapies have indicated that generation of the most effective therapeutic strategies requires not only targeting tumor or stroma cells, but also methods to overcome blockade of anti-tumor immune responses. In addition to lymphoid immune suppressor cells such as regulatory T cells (Tregs), distinct populations of myeloid cells such as myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) can effectively block anti-tumor immune responses, thereby representing an important obstacle for immunotherapy. While MDSCs are rare or absent in healthy individuals, increased numbers of MDSCs have been identified in tumor sites and peripheral circulation. Recent studies have in particular focused on MDSCs in the context of tumor promoting, immune suppressing, stroma in solid tumors. However, their presence and role in the tumor promoting, immune suppressive microenvironment in MM remains unclear. Methods: Here we assessed the presence, frequency, and functional characteristics of MDSCs in patients with newly diagnosed or relapsed MM compared to MM patients with response and healthy donors. We first identified a distinct MDSC population (CD11b+CD14−HLA-DR-/lowCD33+CD15+) with tumor promoting and immune suppressive activity in both PB and BM of MM patients. Moreover, we determined the immunomodulatory effects of lenalidomide and bortezomib on induction of MDSCs by MM cells, as well as on MDSC function. Results: MDSCs were significantly increased in both PB and BM of patients with active MM compared to healthy donors and MM in response (p<0.01). To determine whether the CD11b+CD14−HLA-DR-/lowCD33+CD15+ myeloid cell population represents functional MDSCs, we first assessed tumor promoting role of MDSCs in the MM microenvironment by culturing MM cell lines with MM patient bone marrow stroma cells (BMSC), with or without depletion of MDSCs. Importantly, BMSC-mediated MM growth decreased to baseline levels of MM cells alone when MDSCs were removed from the BMSC microenvironment. Moreover, MDSCs isolated from MM-BM using magnetic-Ab and/or FACS sorting cell separation, directly induced MM cell growth and survival, evidenced by 3H-thymidine incorporation and MTT assays. Since the interaction between tumor and stromal accessory cells is bidirectional, we next analysed the impact of MM cells on MDSC development. Importantly, MM cell lines cultured with PBMCs from healthy donors induced a 7 fold increase in MDSCs. We also examined the immune suppressive functions of MDSCs in cultures of autologous T cells with T cell stimulators, in the presence and absence of MDSCs from MM-PB or MM-BM. Freshly isolated MDSCs from both MM-PB and MM-BM induced significant inhibition of autologous T cell proliferation. Moreover, MDSC-associated immune inhibitory molecules arginase-1 (ARG-1) and reactive oxygen species (ROS), as well as inhibitory cytokines IL-6 and IL-10, were significantly increased in BM MDSCs, evidenced by intracellular flow cytometry analysis. In addition, MM BM MDSCs induced development of Treg from autologous naïve CD4+T cells. Finally, we analysed whether MDSCs impacted response to bortezomib and lenalidomide. Culture of MDSCs with MM cell lines, with or without bortezomib (5nM) and lenalidomide (1uM), demonstrated that less MM cell cytotoxicity in the presence of MDSCs. Conclusions: Our data show that MDSCs are increased in the MM microenvironment and mediate tumor growth and drug resistance, as well as immune suppression. Therefore targeting MDSCs represents a promising novel immune-based therapeutic strategy to both inhibit tumor cell growth and restore host immune function in MM. Disclosures: Raje: Onyx: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Millennium: Consultancy; Acetylon: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Eli-Lilly: Research Funding. Munshi:Celgene: Consultancy; Millenium: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy. Richardson:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Johnson & Johnson: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Anderson:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Vecabrutinib Is Efficacious In Vivo in a Preclinical CLL Adoptive Transfer Model

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1868-1868 ◽  
Author(s):  
Billy Michael Chelliah Jebaraj ◽  
Annika Scheffold ◽  
Eugen Tausch ◽  
Judith A. Fox ◽  
Pietro Taverna ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Cd8 T Cells ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Tumor Burden ◽  
Transfer Model ◽  
Advisory Committees

Abstract B cell receptor signaling (BCR) in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) drives tumor cell proliferation and survival. Inhibition of Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK), a key enzyme in the BCR pathway, has proved to be efficacious even in poor-risk and chemo-refractory patients. However resistance to the BTK inhibitor ibrutinib has been shown to emerge in a subset of CLL patients. Of importance, the C481S BTK mutation conferred resistance by preventing the covalent binding of ibrutinib to its target cysteine 481 in BTK. Vecabrutinib (formerly known as SNS-062, a succinate salt) is a novel, highly potent, next generation noncovalent BTK inhibitor which demonstrated biochemical and cellular activity against C481S BTK mutant in vitro. However, the efficacy of vecabrutinib and its impact on the T-cell microenvironment has not been studied in in vivo preclinical CLL models. In the present study, the efficacy of vecabrutinib was investigated using the Eµ-TCL1 adoptive transfer model. Mice were randomized to treatment with either 40mg/kg vecabrutinib succinate, twice daily by oral gavage (n=6) or vehicle control (n=6). The mice were sacrificed after 2 weeks of treatment and changes in tumor burden as well as alterations in T-cell microenvironment were analysed in detail. Treatment with vecabrutinib decreased tumor burden as observed by a significant decrease in WBC count (36.5 vs. 17.1 giga/L; P=0.002), spleen weight (median 0.56g vs. 0.31g; P=0.005) and liver weight (median 1.5g vs. 1.2g; P=0.005) compared to vehicle treatment. Correspondingly, the CD5+ CD19+ tumor cells were significantly decreased in blood (P=0.002) and spleen (P=0.002) while no significant difference was observed in bone marrow (P=0.818) upon treatment with vecabrutinib. Since BTK inhibition is known to reshape the tumor microenvironment, we studied the impact of vecabrutinib specifically on T-cell subsets. Firstly, no difference in the proportions of CD4 or CD8 expressing T-cells was observed in mice treated with vehicle or vecabrutinib. However, of interest, the percentage of CD4+ CD25+ FoxP3+ regulatory T cells (Tregs) were significantly decreased upon treatment with vecabrutinib in peripheral blood (P=0.026) and spleen (P=0.009). The decrease in Tregs was due to reduced proliferation of these cells upon exposure to the drug as measured by Ki-67 staining. Also, the Tregs expressing the maturation and activation markers such as CD103 and GITR were significantly decreased in blood and spleen upon drug treatment. Further, we analysed the changes in CD8 T-cell subsets following treatment with vecabrutinib. Treatment with the drug resulted in expansion of the CD127+ CD44- naïve CD8 T-cells in blood, bone marrow and spleen (all P values 0.002) while the CD127+ CD44+ memory CD8 T-cells were significantly decreased in bone marrow and spleen (all P values 0.009). Also, the CD127low CD44int-hi effector CD8 T-cells were decreased in blood (P=0.004), bone marrow (P=0.004) and spleen (P=0.002) upon vecabrutinib treatment. Therefore, vecabrutinib treatment did not alter the percentage of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in mice however, significant changes in the subset composition of the CD4 and CD8 T cells were observed. Lastly, to analyse the impact of vecabrutinib on survival, a cohort of mice (n=12) were transplanted with 5 million splenic tumor cells isolated from Eµ-TCL1 transgenic mice. After allowing for engraftment, the mice were randomized to treatment with the drug (n=6) or vehicle (n=6). Of note, the mice treated with the drug showed a significant increase in survival (median 35 days from transplant; P<0.001) compared to treatment with vehicle (median 28 days). In summary, vecabrutinib was efficacious in vivo in a preclinical CLL adoptive transfer model, decreasing tumor burden in different organs and significantly improving survival. Treatment with the drug altered the T-cell architecture in vivo. Of interest, the immunosuppressive Tregs, which protect the tumor from immune surveillance were decreased in various tissue compartments; however, a decrease in the effector CD8 T cells might impact anti-tumor immunity if there is a consistent effect upon drug treatment. Vecabrutinib antitumor activity and effects on T-cell populations in vivo in this preclinical CLL model are intriguing, merits further investigation and supports the ongoing phase 1b/2 study in patients with previously treated B-lymphoid malignancies (NCT03037645). Disclosures Tausch: AbbVie: Consultancy, Other: Travel grants; Celgene: Consultancy, Other: Travel grants; Gilead: Consultancy, Other: Travel grants. Fox:Sunesis Pharmaceuticals: Employment; Amphivena Therapeutics: Employment. Taverna:Sunesis Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Stilgenbauer:Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Hoffmann La-Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Genzyme: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pharmcyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Normalization of the Immune Microenvironment during Lenalidomide Maintenance Is Associated with Sustained MRD Negativity in Patients with Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 329-329
Author(s):  
David G. Coffey ◽  
Francesco Maura ◽  
Edgar Gonzalez-Kozlova ◽  
Javier Diaz-Mejia3 ◽  
Ping Luo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
T Cells ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Immune Cell ◽  
Immune Microenvironment ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Cellular And Humoral Immunity

Abstract Background: The progression of multiple myeloma (MM) during ongoing therapy is driven by a complex interplay between tumor cells and their surrounding immune microenvironment. We were motivated to conduct a comprehensive and orthogonal investigation of the cellular and humoral immunity of patients with MM treated with lenalidomide maintenance therapy. We compared patients who achieved sustained minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity during the first year of maintenance therapy to those who lost or were unable to attain an MRD negative state. Methods: As part of our prospective phase II clinical trial designed to investigate the MRD dynamics and the efficacy of continuous lenalidomide maintenance in MM (NCT02538198, Lancet Haematology 2021; 8:e422-32), we conducted a pre-planned correlative investigation to elucidate the roles of cellular and humoral immunity. We leveraged single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) coupled with V(D)J sequencing of peripheral blood mononuclear cells and CyTOF mass cytometry of bone marrow samples collected before and approximately one year after starting maintenance therapy (median 342 days). Proteomic analysis of 92 immuno-oncology related proteins within bone marrow plasma was performed using Olink. Reference-based mapping was used to perform automated cell classification of 31 immune cell subtypes using scRNAseq. A custom 38-marker panel enabled the identification of 21 immune cell subtypes by CyTOF. A total of 40 peripheral blood samples from 20 patients were analyzed by scRNAseq, 28 bone marrow aspirates from 14 patients were analyzed by CyTOF, and 34 plasma samples from 16 patients were analyzed by Olink. Results: Prior to maintenance therapy, 11 (46%) patients completed planned induction therapy and high-dose melphalan (HDM) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT); 13 (54%) received planned induction therapy without HDM-ASCT. Through the integration of scRNAseq and CyTOF by bioinformatic analyses, we were able to characterize the cellular composition and phenotypic states of the immune microenvironment before maintenance therapy and after exposure to lenalidomide. Profound and sustained immunosuppression was observed among patients exposed to HDM-ASCT, which associated with accelerated seeding of MM recurrence (Nature Communications 2020;11:3617). Independent of prior exposure to HDM-ASCT, we found differential abundance of immune cell composition to be associated with sustained versus unsustained MRD negativity. Additionally, patients who achieved and sustained MRD negativity (compared to patients with unsustained MRD negativity) had increased frequency of circulating naïve CD8+ T cells in their baseline sample, as well as elevated levels of circulating naïve CD4+ T cells during therapy. When investigating the dynamics of the immune microenvironment longitudinally, circulating regulatory T cells were found to increase during maintenance therapy among patients who had early progression. In the bone marrow, NK cells were more abundant in patients who achieved but could not sustain MRD negativity while vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) levels were increased in patients with sustained MRD negativity. We compared our results to a separate report describing the immune microenvironment in patients with MM and healthy donors (Zavidij et al. Nature Cancer 2020;1:493-506) and found the immune landscape of MM patients with sustained MRD negativity to gradually normalize. In contrast, immunosuppression remained present at baseline and during follow-up in MM patients with unsustained MRD negativity. Conclusions: Our findings represent the first detailed characterization of the longitudinal dynamics of the immune microenvironment in relation to low-burden disease in patients with MM treated with lenalidomide maintenance therapy. As expected, HDM-ASCT exposure translated into long-term cellular and humoral immunosuppression, which correlated with dynamics of MM recurrence. Independent of the profound impact of HDM-ASCT on host immunity, the composition of the immune microenvironment varied according to the depth of response. Patients with unsustained MRD negativity had hallmarks of immune dysregulation at baseline and during lenalidomide maintenance, while those who achieved and sustained MRD negativity showed gradual normalization of the immune microenvironment. Disclosures Maura: Medscape: Consultancy, Honoraria; OncLive: Honoraria. Smith: BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties: CAR T cells for MM; Sanofi: Patents & Royalties: GPRC5D antibody based therapies; Novarits: Consultancy; Chimeric Therapeutics: Consultancy; Fate Therapeutics: Research Funding; Eureka Therapeutics: Consultancy. Lesokhin: bristol myers squibb: Research Funding; Genetech: Research Funding; Trillium Therapeutics: Consultancy; pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Serametrix, Inc: Patents & Royalties; Behringer Ingelheim: Honoraria; Iteos: Consultancy. Kazandjian: Arcellx: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Green: Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Cellectar Biosciences: Research Funding; GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; JANSSEN Biotech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Juno Therapeutics: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Legend Biotech: Consultancy; Neoleukin Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; SpringWorks Therapeutics: Research Funding. Landgren: Celgene: Research Funding; Janssen: Other: IDMC; Janssen: Honoraria; Janssen: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; Amgen: Research Funding; Takeda: Other: IDMC; GSK: Honoraria.

scholarly journals Carfilzomib Thalidomide and Dexamethasone Is Safe and Effective in the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Preliminary Outcome from the Open Label Phase II ALLGMM018/AMN003 Study

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1955-1955
Author(s):  
Hang Quach ◽  
Simon J. Harrison ◽  
Slavisa Ninkovic ◽  
Jane Estell ◽  
Noemi Horvath ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
T Cells ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: Carfilzomib lenalidomide and dexamethasone (KRd) is FDA-approved for the treatment relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) based on data from the ASPIRE study (Stewart K et al. NEJM 2015). Thalidomide, a first generation immunomodulatory drug (IMiD) is less costly than lenalidomide and is synergistic in combination with proteasome inhibitors in the treatment of MM. ALLG MM018/ AMN003 is an open label phase II study of carfilzomib thalidomide and dexamethasone (KTd) for patients with RRMM. The primary end point is progression free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints include overall response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), safety and health related quality of life. Method: Eligible patients were those with RRMM who have had 1-3 prior lines of treatment. The KTd regimen consisted of carfilzomib [20mg/m2 IV C1D1 and 2, 56mg/m2 (36mg/m2 for patients age ≥75 years) from C1D8 onwards], thalidomide (100mg po nocte) and dexamethasone [40mg (20mg for patients age ≥75 years) po weekly], in a 28-day cycle. After 12 cycles, thalidomide was omitted and Kd [carfilzomib 56mg/m2 (36/m2 for patients age ≥75 years) on days 1,2,15,16 and dexamethasone 40mg (20mg for patients age ≥75 years) on days 1,15 every 28 days]was continued for a further 6 cycles. Peripheral blood and bone marrow aspirate and trephine for correlative studies were collected from the first 30 patients, at baseline, after cycle 6 and at confirmed disease progression. The aim of the correlative study was to assess for immunological correlates to clinical outcome. Immunological parameters that will be assessed include NK and T cells subsets on peripheral blood via mass cytometry (CyTOF). On the bone marrow trephine, NK cells, T cells, GRP78 expression within CD38 positive plasma cells, PD1 and PDL1 expression will be assessed at the myeloma site and the surrounding microenvironment using OPAL multiplex immunohistochemistry technology. Results: Between March 2017 to June 2018, 56 patients (median age 66 years, range 56-79; 77% Caucasian and 23% Asian) out of the planned 100 were enrolled, with a median follow up of 4.9 (range, 1.0-13.7) months. Response rates in 39 evaluable patients were ≥MR (97%), ≥PR (89%) and ≥VGPR (66%). Median PFS is not reached, and no patients with ≥MR have relapsed. Grade ≥3/4 AEs occurred in 56% of patients, the most common of which were peripheral sensory neuropathy (13%), dyspnoea (13%) and infections (7%). All grade cardiovascular AEs included dyspnoea (27%), cardiac complications (5%), systemic-hypertension (9%) and pulmonary-hypertension (1.9%), however very few were grade ≥3. Three patients have died on study from disease complications, haemorrhage, and primary cardiac ischaemic event. Thus far, we have not found a significant difference in rates or profile of adverse events between the Caucasian versus Asian subgroups of patients. Conclusion: This preliminary analysis demonstrates that the KTd combination is a tolerable regimen for patients with RRMM with a safety profile in line with previous reports for each of carfilzomib and thalidomide. Initial response rates appear very promising and durable with responses up to 13.7 months thus far in some patients. Patient accrual is ongoing. Disclosures Quach: Janssen Cilag: Consultancy; Sanofi Genzyme: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Harrison:Janssen-Cilag: Other: Scientific advisory board. Mollee:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Durie:Takeda: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy. Chng:ASLAN Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Architecture of Sample Preparation and Data Governance of Immuno-Genomic Data Collected from Bone Marrow and Peripheral Blood Samples Obtained from Multiple Myeloma Patients

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 17-18
Author(s):  
Shaadi Mehr ◽  
Daniel Auclair ◽  
Mark Hamilton ◽  
Leon Rozenblit ◽  
Hearn Jay Cho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Mass Cytometry ◽  
Data Governance ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Blood Samples ◽  
Data Files

Abstract: Title: Architecture of sample preparation and data governance of Immuno-genomic data collected from bone marrow and peripheral blood samples obtained from multiple myeloma patients In multiple myeloma (MM), the interactions between malignant plasma cells and the bone marrow microenvironment is crucial to fully understand tumor development, disease progression, and response to therapy. The core challenge in understanding those interactions has been the establishment of a standard process and a standard model for handling the data quality workflow and the underlying data models. Here we present the Platform (Figure 1), an integrated data flow architecture designed to create data inventory and process tracking protocols for multi-dimensional and multi-technology immune data files. This system has been designed to inventory and track peripheral blood and bone marrow samples from multiple myeloma subjects submitted for immune analysis under the MMRF Immune Atlas initiative (figure 2), and the processing and storage of Single Cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq) and Mass Cytometry time-of-flight (CyTOF) data files derived from these immune analyses. While these methods have been previously applied on both tumor and immune populations in MM [2,3], this level of multi-institutional and multi-technology is unique. The Cloud Immune-Precision platform contains standardized protocols and bioinformatics workflows for the identification and categorization of immune cell populations and functional states based upon scRNA-seq gene signatures (ref: Bioinformatics manuscript in submission) and CyTOF protein signatures. Upon further expansion, it will contain high dimensional scRNAseq and CyTOF immune data from both bone marrow and peripheral blood samples from myeloma patients enrolled in the Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation (MMRF) CoMMpass study (NCT01454297) [1] (Figure 3). The architecture covers the automation of data governance protocols, data transformation and ETL model developments that will create an immune proteomic and profiling database and its integration into clinical and genomics databases: e.g. the MMRF CoMMpass clinical trial. This large-scale data integration will establish a cutting-edge Immune-Precision central platform supporting large scale, immune-focused advanced analytics in multiple myeloma patients. This platform will allow researchers to interrogate the relationships between immune transcriptomic and proteomic signatures and tumor genomic features, and their impact on clinical outcomes, to aid in the optimization of therapy and therapeutic sequencing. Furthermore, this platform also promotes the potential to (further) elucidate the mechanisms-of-action of approved and experimental myeloma therapies, drive biomarker discovery, and identify new targets for drug discovery. Figure 1: Cloud Immune-Precision Platform (Integrated data flow architecture designed to create data inventory and process tracking protocols for multi-dimensional and multi-technology immune data files) Figure 2: Sample tracking process architecture Figure 3: Data file creation and repository process tracking References: 1- Settino, Marzia et al. "MMRF-CoMMpass Data Integration and Analysis for Identifying Prognostic Markers." Computational Science - ICCS 2020: 20th International Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, June 3-5, 2020, Proceedings, Part III vol. 12139 564-571. 22 May. 2020, doi:10.1007/978-3-030-50420-5_42 2- Ledergor, Guy et al. "Single cell dissection of plasma cell heterogeneity in symptomatic and asymptomatic myeloma." Nature medicine vol. 24,12 (2018): 1867-1876. doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0269-2 3- Hansmann, Leo et al. "Mass cytometry analysis shows that a novel memory phenotype B cell is expanded in multiple myeloma." Cancer immunology research vol. 3,6 (2015): 650-60. doi:10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-14-0236-T Figure 1 Disclosures Bhasin: Canomiiks Inc: Current equity holder in private company, Other: Co-Founder. Dhodapkar:Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other; Celgene/BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other; Roche/Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other; Lava Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other; Kite: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other.

scholarly journals Phase II Trial of the Combination of Ixazomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone in High-Risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 804-804 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Bustoros ◽  
Chia-jen Liu ◽  
Kaitlen Reyes ◽  
Kalvis Hornburg ◽  
Kathleen Guimond ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Rna Sequencing ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Background. This study aimed to determine the progression-free survival and response rate using early therapeutic intervention in patients with high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) using the combination of ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone. Methods. Patients enrolled on study met eligibility for high-risk SMM based on the newly defined criteria proposed by Rajkumar et al., Blood 2014. The treatment plan was designed to be administered on an outpatient basis where patients receive 9 cycles of induction therapy of ixazomib (4mg) at days 1, 8, and 15, in combination with lenalidomide (25mg) at days 1-21 and Dexamethasone at days 1, 8, 15, and 22. This induction phase is followed by ixazomib (4mg) and lenalidomide (15mg) maintenance for another 15 cycles. A treatment cycle is defined as 28 consecutive days, and therapy is administered for a total of 24 cycles total. Bone marrow samples from all patients were obtained before starting therapy for baseline assessment, whole exome sequencing (WES), and RNA sequencing of plasma and bone marrow microenvironment cells. Moreover, blood samples were obtained at screening and before each cycle to isolate cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and circulating tumor cells (CTCs). Stem cell collection is planned for all eligible patients. Results. In total, 26 of the planned 56 patients were enrolled in this study from February 2017 to April 2018. The median age of the patients enrolled was 63 years (range, 41 to 73) with 12 males (46.2%). Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (iFISH) was successful in 18 patients. High-risk cytogenetics (defined as the presence of t(4;14), 17p deletion, and 1q gain) were found in 11 patients (61.1%). The median number of cycles completed was 8 cycles (3-15). The most common toxicities were fatigue (69.6%), followed by rash (56.5%), and neutropenia (56.5%). The most common grade 3 adverse events were hypophosphatemia (13%), leukopenia (13%), and neutropenia (8.7%). One patient had grade 4 neutropenia during treatment. Additionally, grade 4 hyperglycemia occurred in another patient. As of this abstract date, the overall response rate (partial response or better) in participants who had at least 3 cycles of treatment was 89% (23/26), with 5 Complete Responses (CR, 19.2%), 9 very good partial responses (VGPR, 34.6%), 9 partial responses (34.6%), and 3 Minimal Responses (MR, 11.5%). None of the patients have shown progression to overt MM to date. Correlative studies including WES of plasma cells and single-cell RNA sequencing of the bone microenvironment cells are ongoing to identify the genomic and transcriptomic predictors for the differential response to therapy as well as for disease evolution. Furthermore, we are analyzing the cfDNA and CTCs of the patients at different time points to investigate their use in monitoring minimal residual disease and disease progression. Conclusion. The combination of ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone is an effective and well-tolerated intervention in high-risk smoldering myeloma. The high response rate, convenient schedule with minimal toxicity observed to date are promising in this patient population at high risk of progression to symptomatic disease. Further studies and longer follow up for disease progression are warranted. Disclosures Bustoros: Dava Oncology: Honoraria. Munshi:OncoPep: Other: Board of director. Anderson:C4 Therapeutics: Equity Ownership; Celgene: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Takeda Millennium: Consultancy; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopep: Equity Ownership. Richardson:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Ghobrial:Celgene: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy.

Phase 1/2 Study of Elotuzumab in Combination with Bortezomib in Patients with Multiple Myeloma with One to Three Prior Therapies: Interim Results.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 3876-3876 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrzej J Jakubowiak ◽  
William Bensinger ◽  
David Siegel ◽  
Todd M. Zimmerman ◽  
Jan M. Van Tornout ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Clinical Response ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Mononuclear Cells ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Surface Glycoprotein ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Cell Surface Glycoprotein

Abstract Abstract 3876 Poster Board III-812 Background Elotuzumab is a humanized monoclonal IgG1 antibody directed against CS1, a cell surface glycoprotein, which is highly and uniformly expressed in multiple myeloma (MM). In mouse xenograft models of MM, elotuzumab demonstrated significantly enhanced anti-tumor activity when combined with bortezomib compared to bortezomib alone (Van Rhee et al., Mol. Cancer Ther., in press, 2009). This phase 1/2 trial will determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), overall safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and clinical response of elotuzumab in combination with bortezomib in patients with relapsed MM following 1-3 prior therapies. Methods The study consists of 4 escalating cohorts of elotuzumab (2.5 mg/kg to 20 mg/kg) administered on Days 1 and 11 and bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2) administered on Days 1, 4, 8 and 11 of a 21-day cycle. Patients with progressive disease at the end of Cycle 2 or 3 also receive oral dexamethasone (20 mg) on Days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11 and 12 of each subsequent cycle. Patients with stable disease or better at the end of 4 cycles will continue treatment for 6 or more cycles unless withdrawn earlier due to unexpected toxicity or disease progression. Key entry criteria: age ≥ 18 years; confirmed diagnosis of MM and documentation of 1 to 3 prior therapies; measurable disease M-protein component in serum and/or in urine; and no prior bortezomib treatment within 2 weeks of first dose. Results To date, a total of 16 MM patients with a median age of 64 years have been enrolled in the study. The median time from initial diagnosis of MM was 3.5 years and patients had received a median of 2 prior MM treatments. Patients have been treated in four cohorts; 3 each in 2.5, 5 and 10 mg/kg elotuzumab cohorts, and 7 in the 20 mg/kg elotuzumab cohort. No dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was observed during the first cycle of the study and the MTD was not established. Five SAEs have been reported in four patients in later treatment cycles; two events, chest pain and gastroenteritis, occurring in one patient, were considered elotuzumab-related. Other SAEs include grade 3 sepsis, vomiting, pneumonia and grade 2 dehydration. The most common AEs reported include Grade 1-3 diarrhea, constipation, nausea, fatigue, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, anemia and peripheral neuropathy. The best clinical response (EBMT criteria) for the 16 patients who have received at least two cycles of treatment is shown in the table below. Preliminary PK analysis suggests a serum half-life of 10-11 days at higher doses (10 and 20 mg/kg). Preliminary analysis of peripheral blood mononuclear cells and bone marrow of patients on study indicates that objective responses in the study correlate well with complete saturation of CS1 sites by elotuzumab on bone marrow plasma and NK cells. Conclusions The combination of elotuzumab with bortezomib has a manageable adverse event profile and shows promising preliminary efficacy with ≥PR in 44% and ≥MR in 75% of all enrolled patients. Accrual is ongoing in the expanded 20 mg/kg cohort. Updated safety, efficacy, and PK data will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures: Jakubowiak: Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Centocor Ortho Biotech: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Exelixis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: Bortezomib in combination with elotuzumab for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Bensinger:Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Siegel:Millennium: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Zimmerman:Millennium: Speakers Bureau; Centecor: Speakers Bureau. Van Tornout:BMS: Employment. Zhao:Facet Biotech: Employment. Singhal:Facet Biotech: Employment. Anderson:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Multiple Myeloma In Complete Remission After Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation: Impact of Bone Marrow Plasma Cell Assessment by Conventional Morphology on Disease Progression

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 2946-2946
Author(s):  
Carlos Fernández de Larrea ◽  
Natalia Tovar ◽  
María Rozman ◽  
Laura Rosiñol ◽  
Juan I. Aróstegui ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Bone Marrow Aspirate ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Bone Marrow Plasma ◽  
Serum And Urine

Abstract Abstract 2946 Background: The achievement of complete remission (CR) is the crucial step for a long-lasting response and prolonged survival after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). The European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) criteria for CR include the negativity of serum and urine immunofixation (IFE) and less than 5% of bone marrow plasma cells (BMPCs). Additionally, the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) has even proposed a stringent CR category, which requires to rule out the clonal nature of the BMPCs. However, few studies have addressed this issue in patients with MM and negative IFE. The aim of the present study was to determine the impact of plasma cell count in the bone marrow aspirate on the long-term outcome of patients with MM with negative IFE after ASCT. Methods: Thirty-five patients (16M/19F; median age at ASCT 55 years, range 26–68) with MM who underwent ASCT from March 1994 to December 2008, were studied. All patients had achieved a negative serum and urine IFE after high dose therapy with melphalan-based regimens. Bone marrow aspirate was performed when negative serum and urine IFE was achieved and at least three months from ASCT (median 3.24 months). The analysis was based on microscopic revision for May-Grünwald-Giemsa stained bone marrow smears performed according to standard procedures. BMPC percentage was calculated independently by two observers counting 500 bone marrow total nucleated cells in random areas from two different slides (1000 cells on each patient). Results: Median BMPCs percentage was 0.8 (range 0.1–5.8). Only two patients had more than 3% BPMCs. These results are in contrast with a recent report from the Mayo Clinic group, where 14% of the patients with MM and negative IFE had 5% or more BMPCs. In univariate Cox-model regression analysis, the number of BMPCs significantly correlated with progression-free survival (PFS)(p=0.021) with no impact on overall survival (OS)(p=0.92). This statistical significance on PFS was retained in the multivariate analysis, when baseline prognostic factors such as age, hemoglobin level, serum creatinine, β2-microglobulin and Durie-Salmon stage were added to the model (p=0.003). To establish the best predictive cut-off for progression and survival, a receptor-operator curve (ROC) analysis was developed. It showed the value of 1.5% BMPCs, with a sensitivity of 53%, specificity of 90% and area under the curve of 0.66 for predicting progression. Ten patients had more than 1.5% BMPC, and 25 equal or less than 1.5% BMPC. Median PFS was 8.5 years (CI 95% 2.6 to 14.3) and was not reached in patients with ≤1.5% BMPCs versus 3.1 years in patients with >1.5% BMPCs, with a hazard ratio probability to progression of 3.02 (CI 95% 1.18 to 9.71)(p=0.016) in the group with more than 1.5% of BMPCs (Figure 1). Median OS was not reached in patients with ≤1.5% compared with a median of 9.7 years in those with more than 1.5% BMPCs (p=0.195) (Figure 2). It is likely that serological CR with very low percentage of BMPCs (i.e. ≤1.5%) is equivalent to negative MRD assessed by MFC or molecular studies. In fact, all 8 patients in continued CR between 9 and 16 years beyond ASCT (“operational cures”) are in the group with ≤1.5% BMPCs, while all patients in the group with >1.5% BPMC have relapsed within the first 9 years from ASCT (Figure 1). Conclusion: The percentage of BMPCs in patients with MM in CR after ASCT is a strong predictor of progression. Bone marrow morphology examination is an easy, inexpensive, and non-time consuming test and it should be the first step in the estimation of the residual tumor mass in patients with MM in CR after ASCT. Disclosures: Rosiñol: Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cibeira:Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Blade:Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document