scholarly journals Myeloproliferative Neoplasms in Patients below 25 Years Old at Diagnosis: A Retrospective International Cooperative Work

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1759-1759
Author(s):  
Ianotto Jean-Christophe ◽  
Jean-Jacques Kiladjian ◽  
Marta Sobas ◽  
Parvis Sadjadian ◽  
Lee-Yung Shih ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Myeloproliferative Neoplasms ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Vascular Events ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Disease Evolution

Abstract Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are most common in old people (>60 years) and are rarely identified in children and young adults where information about complication rates and long-term data are lacking. To improve our knowledge, we retrospectively collected cases of young patients diagnosed with MPN before 25 years of age and analysed data of their disease to date, including vascular events and disease evolution. Data were collected in 29 hospital centres from 12 countries. Between 1971 and 2018, 335 young patients were diagnosed for an MPN before the age of 25. They were mostly females (n=246; 73.4%) with a median age of 20.3 years at diagnosis (2.5 months-25 years). Essential thrombocythemia was diagnosed in 234 patients (69.8%), polycythemia vera in 60 (17.9%) and myelofibrosis or unclassified MPN in 41 (12.3%). Most of the diagnoses were made following a coincidental blood count analysis (n=75; 51%) some based on symptoms (n=57; 38.8%) or thrombotic events (n=15; 10.2%). In terms of complications before or at diagnosis, 31 (9.3%) patients experienced thrombosis, mostly venous (75%) and 13 (3.9%) had hemorrhage. At diagnosis, the median leukocyte count was 9x109/l (range: 3-22.8), median hemoglobin count 140 g/l (65-220) and median platelet count 900x109/l (99-3290). To assess the diagnosis, 158 patients (47.2%) had had bone marrow aspirates and 214 (63.9%) a bone marrow biopsy. Mutational status was available in 319 (90%) cases: 194 (60.8%) were JAK2V617F positive, 48 (15%) had a calreticulin mutation, 76 (23.8%) were triple-negative and 1 patient had MPL mutation. The median follow-up of the cohort was 7.7 years (0-46.8) with 134 patients (40%) having follow-up for more than 10 years. 81 female patients (32.9%) experienced pregnancies. During this period, 295 patients (88%) received at least one drug for their MPN: 254 patients (77.2%) received antithrombotic drug and 222 patients (66.5%) a cytoreductive drug. As first line of treatment, hydroxycarbamide was given to 111 patients (50%) whereas anagrelide was given to 56 patients (25.2%) and interferon to 50 (22.5%). During the follow-up, 97 patients (29%) experienced at least one complication. In terms of cardiovascular events, 38 (11.3%) patients experienced thromboses with 50 events in total (recurrences in 12 cases), including 33 venous events (66%) of which 15 were localized in the splanchnic territory (45.5%). Hemorrhagic events were recorded in 34 cases (10.1%). During the follow-up, 39 patients (11.6%) have evolved: 11 from ET to PV (28.2%), 26 into MF (66.7%) and 2 into AML (5.1%). All evolutions were exclusive: one event per patient. At the time of the analysis, 66 patients (19.7%) were declared as lost of follow up and 4 were dead (1.2%). This is the largest cohort of patients aged below 25 years at the time of diagnosis demonstrates that despite their youth most of them (88%) received drug(s) for the management of their MPN. There was a high incidence of complications (29%), with vascular events and disease evolution occurring at equal frequency although death was uncommon (1.2%). Rates of events were disease evolution: 1.51/100pts/y; thromboses: 1.47 and hemorrhages: 1.32. No specific national or international guidance exists for MPN patients of this age; but our data suggest that these are not benign conditions and patients need to be carefully followed and treated. Table. Table. Disclosures Kiladjian: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AOP Orphan: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Giraudier:Novartis: Research Funding. Griesshammer:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Harrison:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; CTI BioPharma: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Observational Prospective Registry for the Assessment of the Clinical Impact of Starting Anti-Myeloma Treatment at Biological Relapse

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 4765-4765
Author(s):  
Adrian Alegre ◽  
Merche Gironella ◽  
Juan Miguel Bergua ◽  
Esther Gonzalez ◽  
Fernando Escalante ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Marrow Transplant ◽  
Clinical Relapse ◽  
First Line ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Introduction: Despite the great medical advances associated with the introduction of thalidomide, bortezomib (BORT), and lenalidomide (LEN) for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM), it remains an incurable disease. Most patients (pts) show disease progression, consistent with the clinical evolution of MM, and only a low percentage achieve long-term responses and extended progression-free survival (PFS). The heterogeneous nature of MM in both the clinical and biological setting is reflected in the heterogeneity of MM relapses. The International Myeloma Workshop Consensus Panel (Rajkumar, Blood 2011) states that treatment (Tx) shall begin either at clinical relapse with symptoms (clinR), or in the event of asymptomatic relapse with significant paraprotein relapse, biological relapse (BR). The purpose of this Spanish registry is to describe MM relapse patterns comparing the impact of Tx decisions in pts who meet the criteria for biological relapse (BR) according to IMWG criteria with those in whom Tx was delayed until clinical relapse (clinR). Here, the preliminary results of this study are presented. Methods: MM pts in (or previous to) first or second BR who have achieved ≥ PR since their last Tx are eligible for inclusion in this observational prospective registry at the time BR is detected. Evaluations performed at least bi-monthly are mandatory. A total of 41 Spanish sites participated in the registry following approval from their independent ethics committees, with 410 pts expected to be included, without physician’s decision of prescribing Tx affecting the inclusion. The main objective of the registry is to assess the time to progression (TTP) from the start of anti-MM Tx at the onset of asymptomatic BR vs. the start of Tx at the time of clinR. Secondary objectives are to describe demographics of BR; to assess the median time elapsing from BR to clinR; to assess overall response rate (ORR), event-free survival (EFS), PFS, overall survival (OS) at BR and at clinR (if appropriate); to asses safety and quality of life (QoL) using 2 validated questionnaires (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer [EORTC] QLQ-C30 and QLQ-MY24); to document the tolerability profile of the Tx; and to describe the use of associated resources. Here, we summarize baseline characteristics and preliminary results from 83 pts (out of 126 registered pts) who had basal data in the registry at the time of this report. Results: Overall, 79% of pts presented with a BR and 21% were in a bi-monthly watchful waiting follow up. The mean age of pts was 67 years, 53% were female, 57% were in first relapse, 43% and 27% had an ECOG performance status (PS) of 0 and 1, respectively, while the ECOG PS was unknown in 30% of pts at the time of this report. In total, 30% of pts had ISS stage I, 26% had ISS stage II, and 22% had ISS stage III, while ISS stage data were not available or unknown for 12% and 10% of pts, respectively. MM types were IgG Κ (37% of pts), IgG λ (23%), IgA Κ (13%), IgA λ (9%), and type was unknown in 17% of pts. 28% of IgG/IgA MM types were Bence-Jones. Cytogenetic risk assessments were available in 66% of pts. Among those pts with a BR, 51% received active Tx without waiting for a ClinR. First-line Tx was BORT-based in 70% of pts. Overall, 55% of pts had undergone autologous stem cell transplantation, 15% had received consolidation Tx and 34% had received maintenance Tx. After first-line Tx, 17% of pts achieved a stringent complete response (sCR), 31% achieved a CR, 24% achieved a very good partial response (VGPR), and 10% achieved a PR. The median time to BR was 24.53 months. Most (63%) pts who registered after second relapse received LEN-based Tx. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first prospective study in MM to evaluate BR as well as the effects of Tx based on the decision to start Tx at BR vs. clinR. In this preliminary cohort, the physicians’ decision to start active Tx at BR, before the onset of clinR in 50% of cases, was noteworthy. Further follow-up is needed to identify the differences between these two strategies. Updated clinical results will be presented at the meeting. MM-BR Study, Spanish Myeloma Group-GEM/PETHEMA Bibliography Alegre A, et al. Haematologica. 2002;87:609-14. Brioli A, et al. Blood. 2014;123:3414-9. Fernández de Larrea C, et al. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2014;49:223-7. Lenhoff S, et al. Haematologica. 2006;91:1228-33. Rajkumar SV, et al. Blood. 2011;117:4691-5. Zamarin D, et al. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013;48:419-24. Disclosures Alegre: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Jansen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Lahuerta:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ruiz:Celgene: Celgene Stock options as part of the employee's compensation plan Other, Employment. Vilanova:Celgene: Contracted by Celgene Other.

Analysis of Transfusion Dependency Development and Disease Evolution in Patients with MDS with 5q- and without Transfusion Needs at Diagnosis

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 3180-3180
Author(s):  
Felix Lopez-Cadenas ◽  
Blanca Xicoy ◽  
Silvia Rojas P ◽  
Kaivers Jennifer ◽  
Ulrich Germing ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Disease Evolution ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Introduction: Myelodysplastic syndrome with del5q (MDSdel5q) is the only cytogenetically defined MDS category recognized by WHO in 2001, 2008 and 2016 and is defined as a MDS with deletion on the long arm of chromosome 5 and less than 5% of blast cells in bone marrow. It is known that for patients with MDSdel5q and transfusion dependence (TD), Len (LEN) is the first choice of treatment. However, data regarding factors that may impact on the development of TD or disease evolution in patients diagnosed without TD are scanty. In our study a retrospective multicenter analysis on patients with low-int 1 MDSdel5q without TD at diagnosis has been performed in order to answer these questions. Patients and methods: We performed a multicenter collaborative research from the Spanish (RESMD) and German MDS registries. Data from 153 low risk MDSdel5q without TD at diagnosis were retrospectively analyzed. Statistical analysis: Data were summarized using median, range, and percentage. The event of TD was defined as the development of TD according to the IWG criteria (2006) and/or the beginning of a treatment which could modify disease course (LEN or ESA). Transfusion or treatment free survival (TFS), overall survival (OS) and leukemia free survival (LFS) were measured from diagnosis to TD or treatment, the first occurred (or to last follow up if none), last follow up or death from any cause and evolution to AML, respectively. TFS, OS and LFS were analyzed using the Kaplan Ð Meier method. The Log-rank test was used to compare variables and their impact on survival for univariate analysis.Multivariate analysis was performed using Cox's proportional hazards regression model. For comparison of Kaplan Meier curves the long rank test was used, with statistical significance with p<0.05. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 20.0. Results: Main clinical and biological characteristics were summarizing in table 1. From the total of 153 patients, finally 121 were evaluable. During the study 56 patients (46.2%) became in TD and 47 (38.8%) did not develop TD but received a modified disease course treatment. In this sense, most of the patients developed relevant anemia regarding those data (103 out of 121 patients, 85%). Median time to TD or treatment (TFS) was 20 months (1-132) from diagnosis. Secondary MDS (p=0.02), thrombocytosis (>350 109/L) (p=0.007), and neutropenia (<1.5 x 109/L) (p=0.02) were associated with poorer TFS. Thrombocytosis and neutropenia retained statistical significance in the multivariate analysis (Table 2). Among the TD patients (N=56), 42 (75%) received treatment: 28 LEN, 7 ESA and 7 other treatments. Among patients that did not develop TD (N=65), 47 (72.3%) received treatment before TD development: 16 LEN, 28 ESA and 3 other treatments. In order to know the evolution of these patients, survival analysis was performed. Median follow up was 58.9 months among alive patients and 57% of them were alive at the time of the last follow up. Estimated OS at 2 and 5 years was 94% and 64%. Regarding Univariate analysis, platelet <100 x 109/L (p=0.03), patients older than 71 years (p=0.001), and progression into AML (p=0.02) were associated with poorer OS. On the contrary, patients who had received treatment showed better OS (p<0.0001). This benefit is more evident among patients receiving LEN, median OS for patients receiving LEN, ESA/other treatments and not treated group was 137 months (CI 95%: 59,4 -215,5), 99,3 months (CI 95%: 46,6 -152) and 57,9 months (CI 95%: 38,2 -77,6), respectively, p<0.0001 (Figure 1). In the multivariate analysis, patients older than 71 years and LEN treatment retained the statistical significant impact on OS (Table 2). Twenty-eight patients (23%) progressed into AML, median time to AML was 35 months (5-122). When univariate analysis was performed, variables with adverse impact on LFS were platelets <100 x 109/L(p=0.019), neutropenia < 0.8 x 109/L (p=0.026), an additional cytogenetic abnormality (p=0.013) while treatment with LEN had a favorable impact (p=0.035). In the multivariate analysis only the presence of additional cytogenetic abnormalities retained statistical significance (Table 2). CONCLUSIONS: Most of the patients with low risk del(5q) MDS and no TD at diagnosis developed symptomatic anemia very early after diagnosis (20 months). Carefully monitoring should be stablished in order to detect this time point. Outcome of this subset of patients could improve after target therapy. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Del Cañizo: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; janssen: Research Funding; Astex: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Díez Campelo:celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Research Funding; Astex: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Cladribine Combined with Idarubicin and High-Dose AraC (CLIA2) As a Frontline and Salvage Treatment for Young Patients (≤65 yrs) with Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4039-4039 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mansour Alfayez ◽  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Farhad Ravandi ◽  
Guillermo Garcia-Manero ◽  
Marina Y. Konopleva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
Multiparameter Flow Cytometry ◽  
Intrathecal Therapy ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Genetics Research ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Background Nucleoside analogues such as cladribine can increase the efficacy of cytarabine (araC) by modulating deoxycytidine kinase. The addition of cladribine to standard 7+3 chemotherapy has been shown to improve survival in pts with AML (Holowiecki JCO 2012). Results of our part-1 phase-2 clinical trial (cladribine combined with intermediate dose araC and idarubicin (CLIA1)) reported promising results that exceeded pretreatment expectations for response and tolerability (Jain, et. al. ASH 2016). Based on that, and the benefit of higher doses of cytarabine in younger patients (UK-MRC AML, Willemze JCO 2014), we investigated a higher dose of araC in combination with cladribine and idarubicin (CLIA2). Methods Non-APL, non-core binding factor AML pts 18-65 yrs of age with adequate organ function were enrolled in 1 of 3 cohorts: de novo AML, secondary AML (s-AML), or relapsed/refractory AML (R/R). Induction was cladribine 5 mg/m2 IV over 30 minutes on days 1-5, followed by araC 2g/m2 IV on days 1-5, and idarubicin 10 mg/m2 IV days 1-3. Consolidation consisted of up to 5 more cycles of CLIA2 for 3 days instead of 5. Dose-adjustments were allowed for age and PS. Sorafenib or midostaurin was added for pts with FLT3 mutations which occurred in 35% of pts on this study. Prophylactic intrathecal therapy was offered to higher risk pts at count nadir during cycle 1. Mutation profiling was performed using next generation sequencing prior to starting therapy. Results 65 patients were enrolled, with a median age of 47 yrs (range, 24-65): 37 pts (57%) in the frontline, 12 (19%) pts in the s-AML, and 16 (25%) in the R/R cohorts. Pt characteristics and outcomes by cohort are outlined in Table 1. The most commonly detected mutations at baseline were TET2 (45%), DNMT3a (37%), FLT3 (35%), ASXL1 (28%), and NPM1 (28%). Of 35 evaluable pts in the frontline cohort, 31 responded (ORR=89%) with 27 CR (77%) and 4 CRi (11%). Among the responders, 61% were negative for minimal residual disease (MRD [-]) by multiparameter flow cytometry. In the s-AML cohort, 10 pts were evaluable with an ORR of 60% (6/10) with 5 CR (50%) and 1 CRp (10%); 4 (67%) were MRD [-]. In the R/R cohort, 14 pts, previously treated with a median of 1 (1-4) prior therapy were evaluable for response. There were 7 CR (50%), 1 CRi (7%), for ORR of 57%; and 63% were MRD [-]. The median OS was not reached in the frontline and s-AML cohorts with median follow up of 5.2 and 11.5, months, respectively. In the R/R cohort, the median follow up was 4.7 months and median OS was 6.7 months [Figure.1]. Relapse-free survival was not reached in frontline and salvage cohort, and was 9.1 months in s-AML with median follow up of 5.2, 3.9, and 3.5 months in frontline, s-AML, and salvage cohorts, respectively [Figure.2]. The regimen was well tolerated. The most common ≥ grade 3 possibly-related non-hematologic adverse events were fever/infection (38), bleeding (2), and abnormal liver function test (3). Conclusion The 3-drug combination with a higher dose of araC, CLIA2, is safe and effective in younger pts with AML. Compared to our prior experience in pts with s-AML, using higher dose of cytarabine in CLIA2 for this cohort seems to have the highest impact. This trend however was also seen in the salvage and frontline cohorts when compared to the results from CLIA1. Response rates for pts in the newly-diagnosed AML, s-AML, and in the salvage settings are promising and should be explored further in larger studies and compared to current standard regimens. Disclosures Ravandi: Jazz: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Astellas Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sunesis: Honoraria; Sunesis: Honoraria; Macrogenix: Honoraria, Research Funding; Orsenix: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria; Xencor: Research Funding; Astellas Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Xencor: Research Funding; Macrogenix: Honoraria, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Orsenix: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding. Konopleva:Stemline Therapeutics: Research Funding. Daver:Otsuka: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding; Kiromic: Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; ImmunoGen: Consultancy; Alexion: Consultancy; Sunesis: Consultancy; Pfizer: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Sunesis: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; ARIAD: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding. DiNardo:Bayer: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Medimmune: Honoraria; Agios: Consultancy. Bose:Constellation Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding; Astellas Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Blueprint Medicines Corporation: Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding; CTI BioPharma: Research Funding; Pfizer, Inc.: Research Funding. Andreeff:SentiBio: Equity Ownership; Jazz Pharma: Consultancy; Oncoceutics: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Eutropics: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Oncolyze: Equity Ownership; Celgene: Consultancy; Aptose: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Reata: Equity Ownership; Daiichi-Sankyo: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties: MDM2 inhibitor activity patent, Research Funding; United Therapeutics: Patents & Royalties: GD2 inhibition in breast cancer . Pemmaraju:abbvie: Research Funding; cellectis: Research Funding; samus: Research Funding; SagerStrong Foundation: Research Funding; stemline: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; novartis: Research Funding; plexxikon: Research Funding; daiichi sankyo: Research Funding; Affymetrix: Research Funding; celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Jabbour:novartis: Research Funding. Cortes:novartis: Research Funding. Kadia:Abbvie: Consultancy; BMS: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Celgene: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; BMS: Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding.

scholarly journals RON Kinase Is a Novel Therapeutic Target for Philadelphia-Negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1462-1462
Author(s):  
Lindsay Meg Gurska ◽  
Rachel Okabe ◽  
Meng Maxine Tong ◽  
Daniel Choi ◽  
Kristina Ames ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Myeloproliferative Neoplasms ◽  
Marrow Transplant ◽  
Jak Inhibitor ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Stat Signaling ◽  
Genetic Deletion

Abstract The Philadelphia-chromosome negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), including polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocytosis (ET), and primary myelofibrosis (PMF), are clonal hematopoietic stem cell disorders characterized by the proliferation of one or more myeloid lineage compartments. Activation of JAK/STAT signaling is a major driver of all Ph-negative MPNs. During disease progression, MPN patients experience increased pro-inflammatory cytokine secretion, leading to remodeling of the bone marrow microenvironment and subsequent fibrosis. The JAK inhibitor ruxolitinib is an approved targeted therapy for MPN patients and has shown promise in its ability to reduce splenomegaly and the cytokine storm observed in patients. However, JAK inhibitors alone are not sufficient to reduce bone marrow fibrosis or to eliminate the JAK2-mutated clone. Furthermore, JAK inhibitor persistence, or reactivation of JAK/STAT signaling upon chronic JAK inhibitor treatment, has been observed in both MPN mouse models and MPN patients. Therefore, there is an urgent need for new treatment options in MPN. The tyrosine kinase RON, a member of the MET kinase family, has well-characterized roles in erythroblast proliferation and pro-inflammatory cytokine production. RON can be phosphorylated by JAK2 to stimulate erythroblast proliferation. However, the role of RON in MPN pathogenesis is unknown. We found that the ALK/MET/RON/ROS1 inhibitor crizotinib inhibited colony formation by MPN patient CD34+ cells, regardless of their disease subtype, mutation status, or JAK2 inhibitor treatment history (Figure 1A). To determine whether this is due to inhibition of the JAK/STAT signaling pathway, we performed phospho-flow cytometry of STAT3 and STAT5 in myelofibrosis patient erythroblasts treated with crizotinib ex vivo as well as Western blot analysis in the JAK2-mutated cell lines SET2 and HEL. We found that crizotinib inhibits the phosphorylation of JAK2, STAT3, and STAT5 (Figure 1B). Since crizotinib has not been reported to directly inhibit JAK2, we asked whether these effects of crizotinib in MPN cells could be explained by RON inhibition. Consistent with this hypothesis, we observed that shRNA knockdown of multiple RON isoforms also decreases the phosphorylation of JAK2, STAT5, and STAT3 in HEL cells (Figure 1C-D). To determine whether crizotinib can alter the MPN disease course in vivo, we tested crizotinib by oral gavage in the MPLW515L bone marrow transplant murine model of myelofibrosis at 100mg/kg daily for 2 weeks. We showed that crizotinib decreased the disease burden of MPL-W515L mice, as evidenced by decreased spleen and liver weights (Figure 1E). To determine the effects of RON genetic deletion on MPN pathogenesis, we tested whether genetic deletion of Stk (mouse gene for RON) impairs disease progression in the JAK2V617F bone marrow transplant MPN model by transplanting Stk-/- c-Kit+ bone marrow cells transduced with the JAK2V617F-GFP retrovirus into lethally irradiated recipients. We observed a significant delay in disease onset in Stk-/- transplant recipients compared to WT controls (Figure 1F). However, we found that Stk-/- mice have normal numbers of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells, and normal bone marrow myeloid colony forming capacity, suggesting that RON is a safe therapeutic target. To determine whether RON plays a role in the JAK inhibitor persistence phenotype, we generated persistent cells by treating SET2 cells with increasing doses of ruxolitinib over 8 weeks, and confirmed persistent proliferation and JAK/STAT activation. Interestingly, we found that RON phosphorylation is enhanced in JAK inhibitor persistent cells, and that dual inhibition of RON and JAK2 overcomes JAK inhibitor persistence in SET2 cells (Figure 1G-H), suggesting that RON may potentiate the JAK2 persistence phenotype in response to ruxolitinib. Importantly, we showed by immunoprecipitation that phospho-RON and phospho-JAK2 physically interact in JAK inhibitor persistent SET2 cells, and that this interaction is disrupted by crizotinib (Figure 1I). In summary, our data demonstrate that RON kinase is a novel mediator of JAK/STAT signaling in MPNs, and that it plays a particularly important role in JAK inhibitor persistence. Our work suggests that therapeutic strategies to inhibit RON, such as crizotinib, should be investigated in MPN patients. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Halmos: Guardant Health: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Apollomics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; TPT: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Eli-Lilly: Research Funding; Advaxis: Research Funding; Blueprint: Research Funding; Elevation: Research Funding; Mirati: Research Funding; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Astra-Zeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Gritsman: iOnctura: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Safety and Efficacy of Romiplostim in over 200 Children with Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP): Results of an Integrated Database of 5 Clinical Trials

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2428-2428 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael D. Tarantino ◽  
Jenny M. Despotovic ◽  
John Roy ◽  
John Grainger ◽  
Nichola Cooper ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Platelet Count ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Platelet Response ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Baseline Platelet Count ◽  
Platelet Counts

Abstract Background: Romiplostim is approved globally for use in adults with ITP and in the EU for children with ITP. More comprehensive data are needed on the use of romiplostim in children with ITP. Objective: To examine the safety and efficacy of romiplostim in trials in children with ITP. Methods: Data were combined from 5 romiplostim trials in children with ITP, both placebo-controlled (a phase 1/2 and a phase 3 trial) and open-label (a 3-year trial and 2 extension trials); trial data have been reported previously (Bussel Blood 2011, Bussel PBC 2014, Tarantino Lancet 2016, Tarantino ASH 2017, Grainger ASH 2017). Platelet counts in the 4 weeks after use of rescue medication were excluded from analyses. Descriptive statistics were used. Number (n), mean, standard deviation (SD), median, quartile range (Q1, Q3), minimum (min), and maximum (max) for continuous variables, and number and percentage for categorical variables were provided. Results: Patients (N=286, 24 initially placebo and 262 initially romiplostim) had median (Q1, Q3) age of 10 (6, 13) years, ITP duration of 1.9 (1, 4) years, and baseline platelet count of 14 (8, 23)×109/L. Previously, 88% had received corticosteroids, 87% IVIg, and 21% rituximab; 23% had received >3 prior treatments and 7% had prior splenectomy. Of the 282 patients exposed to romiplostim (20 initially received placebo), the median (min, max) duration of treatment was 65 (8, 471) weeks, with a median (min, max) average weekly dose of 6.6 (0.1, 9.7) μg/kg; total exposure was 468 patient-years. The most common reasons for discontinuing the parent study for romiplostim-treated patients were per protocol (19%; eg, sponsor decision, death, lost to follow-up), consent withdrawn (3%), noncompliance (1%), and administrative decision (1%). Of romiplostim-treated patients, 24% had serious adverse events (SAEs), most commonly epistaxis, low platelet counts, and headache (Table). There were 7 cases of postbaseline neutralizing antibody against romiplostim: 2 transient and 5 persistent. There were no neutralizing antibodies against endogenous TPO. For patients undergoing bone marrow biopsies in the 3-year open-label trial, there were no findings of collagen or bone marrow abnormalities (Year 1 n=27, Year 2 n=5, vs. baseline) (Grainger et al, ASH 2017). One patient had an increase in modified Bauermeister bone marrow grade from 0 to 2 (fine reticulin fiber network) with no associated AEs (the only AEs were a cold and injection site pain); per protocol, there was no follow-up biopsy. Once at a steady dose of 10 μg/kg, most (11/16) of this patient's platelet counts were ≥30×109/L. Investigators reported thrombocytosis AEs; 1 patient had a platelet count of 1462×109/L at Week 14 for 1 week and another had elevated platelet counts 10 times between Weeks 20-172 (max of 872×109/L); there were no associated thrombotic events. Median platelet counts rose quickly and were over 50×109/L from Week 12 on (Figure). Platelet response rates also rose quickly. Overall, 89% of romiplostim-treated patients (vs 8% of placebo) had a platelet response (platelet counts ≥50×109/L; Figure). For romiplostim-treated patients, the first platelet responses occurred after a median of 6 weeks. The median % (Q1, Q3) of months responding was 76% (25%, 93%) and # of months responding was 11 (3, 20); from time of first monthly response, the median (Q1, Q3) % of months responding was 92% (75%, 100%) and # of months responding was 14 (7, 23). Nineteen romiplostim-treated patients discontinued all ITP therapies including romiplostim for ≥6 months while maintaining platelet counts ≥50×109/L (here defined as remission). These treatment-free periods lasted a median (Q1, Q3) of 12 (8, 14) months; no placebo patients remained free of treatment. There were no clear differences between those who did and did not enter remission (ie, age, sex, race, past treatment, ITP duration, baseline platelet count). Bleeding was reported for most (68%) patients: mostly grade 1/2, with 10% having grade 3 bleeding (most commonly epistaxis in 13 patients) and 2 patients having grade 4 bleeding (both reported as "ITP"). Conclusions: In this comprehensive database of romiplostim ITP trials in 286 children with 468 patient-years of romiplostim exposure, romiplostim was well tolerated. With romiplostim, the vast majority (89%) of patients had a platelet response, with some children able to discontinue all ITP treatments for ≥6 months. Disclosures Tarantino: Health Resources and Services Administration: Research Funding; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Research Funding; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Shire: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Other: Reviews grants; Novo Nordisk: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Grifols: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Despotovic:AmGen: Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding. Grainger:Biotest: Consultancy; Ono Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Educational grant; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cooper:Amgen, Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kim:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Eisen:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership.

scholarly journals Comparison of MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Peripheral Blood and Bone Marrow Based Flow Cytometry for Tracking Measurable Residual Disease (MRD) in Patients with Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3060-3060
Author(s):  
Marion Eveillard ◽  
Even H Rustad ◽  
Mikhail Roshal ◽  
Yanming Zhang ◽  
Amanda Kathryn Ciardiello ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
M Protein ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Maldi Tof Ms ◽  
Maldi Tof ◽  
Active Disease ◽  
Tof Ms

Introduction In multiple myeloma (MM), the absence of measurable residual disease (MRD) after completed therapy is associated with longer progression free survival. Different techniques are available to detect low levels of plasma cells in bone marrow (BM) either by flow cytometry or by next-generation sequencing as a gold standard of molecular methods. But these techniques are limited because they require a representative bone marrow sample obtained by an invasive procedure. Therefore, detecting low levels of disease in blood would be ideal, because serial sampling is much easier and fully representative, and it would allow for the detection of extramedullary disease. Mass spectrometry-based methods have been shown to be more sensitive for detecting monoclonal proteins (M-protein) in serum. In this study, we were motivated to evaluate MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) head-to-head with an established BM-based MRD assays. Patients and Methods This cohort included 71 patients treated at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) who had serum samples available at 2 timepoints including during active disease and within 60 days of MRD results as determined by flow cytometry of bone marrow aspirates (Flow-BM-MRD). The cohort enrolled 26 females and 45 males with a median age of 61 years (range 37-78 years). Twenty-seven patients had high-risk cytogenetics at baseline. The median time between diagnosis and the MRD timepoint was 13.4 months (3.4-91 months). MALDI-TOF MS analysis was performed according to the method published by Mills et al. Immunoglobulins were purified from serum samples using CaptureSelect beads specific of each isotype and were then eluted from the beads. Light chains and heavy chains were separated by the addition of a reducing agent. Purified samples were mixed in matrix and spotted onto a stainless steel MALDI plate and were analyzed using a Microflex LT MALDI-TOF mass spectrometer (Bruker). Samples taken during active disease were used to identify the mass to charge ratio (m/z) of the M-protein and served as a surrogate marker in the analysis of subsequent samples. MALDI-TOF MS results were compared to the Flow-BM-MRD assay, performed using the MSKCC's ten-color, single-tube method. Results MALDI-TOF MS detected an M-protein in all 71 active disease samples and in 25 MRD samples. MALDI-TOF-MS results at the MRD timepoint were concordant with Flow-BM-MRD for 44/71 patients (p=0.342, chi-square test). Eight patients were positive and 36 negative by both techniques. Twenty-seven patients were discordant, including 10 patients detectable only by Flow-BM-MRD and 17 detectable only by MALDI-TOF MS. Among the 10 patients detectable by flow cytometry but not by MALDI, the median MRD level was 0.00092% (+<0.0001% - 0.011%). The M-protein could have been present but below the polyclonal background. Regarding the 17 patients positive only by MALDI-TOF-MS, the BM sample for flow analysis was not suitable for 3 patients due to hemodilution. The others 14 samples reached the target of sensitivity with a limit of detection of 0.0001%. Alternatively, the MALDI-TOF result could be a false positive in terms of disease detection. MS is likely not falsely detecting M-proteins and indeed, immunofixation was also positive in 11/17 of these samples. However, low levels of M-protein may not indicate the presence of active disease. Indeed, a confounding factor is that immunoglobulins have a long half-life in serum. To determine the clinical utility of more sensitive M-protein detection, we evaluated the clinical outcome for the 48 newly diagnosed MM patients in CR at the MRD timepoint with a median follow-up of 11 months. Of these 48 patients, 2 of the 3 that were positive by both techniques relapsed during follow-up. One out of 27 patients that were negative by both techniques relapsed. None of the 10 patients who were positive only by MALDI-TOF relapsed and 1 of the 8 patients who were positive only by Flow-BM-MRD relapsed. Conclusions This study is important because it is a first step in understanding how to use a more sensitive blood test for the follow-up of MM patients. MALDI-TOF MS analysis may provide complementary results to Flow-BM-MRD especially for the follow-up of patients in CR and during maintenance therapy to detect poor responders that would be positive by both techniques. In summary, our results suggest that MALDI-TOF may be quite useful for early detection of relapse. Disclosures Roshal: Physicians' Education Resource: Other: Provision of services; Celgene: Other: Provision of Services; Auron Therapeutics: Equity Ownership, Other: Provision of services. Hassoun:Celgene: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy. Smith:Celgene: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Fate Therapeutics and Precision Biosciences: Consultancy. Lesokhin:Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Serametrix Inc.: Patents & Royalties; Genentech: Research Funding; GenMab: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Juno: Consultancy, Honoraria. Mailankody:Juno: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Takeda Oncology: Research Funding; CME activity by Physician Education Resource: Honoraria. Landgren:Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Theradex: Other: IDMC; Adaptive: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Other: IDMC; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

scholarly journals A Retrospective Multicenter Case Study Evaluating the Characteristics, Management and Outcome of Acquired Amegakaryocytic Thrombocytopenia

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3167-3167
Author(s):  
Anais Roeser ◽  
Guillaume Moulis ◽  
Mikael Ebbo ◽  
Louis Terriou ◽  
Elsa Poullot ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Platelet Count ◽  
Aplastic Anemia ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Bone Marrow Biopsy ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Acquired Amegakaryocytic Thrombocytopenia

Abstract Introduction Acquired amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia (AAT) is an extremely rare disease characterized by acquired megakaryocytic aplasia or hypoplasia with no other lineage abnormalities. Given limited evidence, the first aim of this study was to describe the characteristics, management and outcome of patients with AAT, the second aim was to examine the therapeutic response through a systematic review of published case reports. Patients and Methods We carried out a retrospective multicenter study through the French Reference Network for Adult Autoimmune Cytopenias, including patients aged &gt; 18 years with acquired thrombocytopenia with a platelet count &lt; 50 x 10 9/L, associated with a megakaryocytes / granulocytes ratio &lt; 50 % on bone marrow, diagnosed from July 2007 to February 2020. Exclusion criteria were: abnormal granular lineage, evidence of dysplasia, bone marrow infiltration by tumor cells or hematologic malignancy, significant karyotype abnormality, and significant paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria clone. Bone marrow biopsy were centrally reviewed. Patients' medical charts were collected using the standardized form of the referral center for adult immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). Response to treatment was defined according to standardized international criteria for ITP: response (R) and complete response (CR) were respectively defined as platelet count of &gt; 30 × 10 9/L with at least a doubling of the baseline value, and platelet count of &gt; 100 × 10 9/L ; overall response as either R or CR. We performed a systematic review conducted through Medline and Scopus databases from 1970 to April 2021. Cases were included in the analysis if initial platelet count was &lt; 50 x 10 9/L and bone marrow examination was available, demonstrating a megakaryocyte hypoplasia or aplasia with no alternate diagnosis. Results We screened 23 patients reported as thrombocytopenia with absence or decreased megakaryocytes. Eleven patients were excluded because of: presence of megakaryocytes on bone marrow biopsy despite megakaryocytic aplasia on bone marrow aspirate (n=2), absence of bone marrow biopsy (n=4), aplastic or hypoplastic bone marrow (n=3), moderate thrombocytopenia &gt; 50 x 10 9/L (n=1), lack of data (n=1). Twelve patients were included in the analysis. AAT patients had a median age of 52.5 years, 5/12 (41.7%) were female, 6/12 (50%) had a preexisting autoimmune disease (Table 1). All bone marrow biopsies reviewed to date contained CD8+ T-cell infiltrates. Eight patients received a first line treatment with corticosteroids and/or intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg), a single response was observed. Ten patients received cyclosporine in monotherapy resulting in 4CR, and 1R or in combination with diverse agents with heterogenous responses. Six had received a single therapy with thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) inducing 4 CR. Eventually, 9 patients (75%) achieved a CR under therapy, obtained with ciclosporin alone in 3 cases, ciclosporin in association with TPO-RA or ATG in 2 cases, cyclophosphamide followed-up by mycophenolate mofetil in 1 case, and TPO-RAs alone in 4 patients (of whom 3 had previously received at least on immunosuppressive therapy). After a median follow up time of 4.0 years (range 1.2 - 11.9), 2 (16%) patients eventually developed an aplastic anemia, 7 and 41.5 months respectively after initial AAT diagnosis. The literature search yielded 108 articles, of which 75 articles reporting 85 cases were included in the final analysis. The pooled analysis of newly reported and historic cases included 97 cases. Overall response rates to corticosteroids and IVIg were respectively 22.4 % and 5.3 % (Table 2). Ciclosporin was used as single agent in 37.1 % of patients, with an overall response rate of 66.7 %. TPO-RAs were used in 9 cases, with a CR in 7 patients (77.8%). Overall, 9/97 patients (9.3 %) experienced an aplastic anemia during the follow-up. The presence of a thymoma was associated with a higher risk of aplastic anemia (OR 6.83 (95%CI 1.22-34.00, p=0.020)). Conclusion Distinguishing AAT from ITP is of significance as the outcome and response to therapy strongly differ. Aplastic anemia may occur in the follow-up but remain rare. Corticosteroids and IVIg are inefficient in most cases, ciclosporin appear to be very effective, TPO-RA could also be an option, as single therapy or in associations. Further data will be needed to define the respective place of these treatments. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Moulis: Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Argenix: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Grifols: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sobi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ebbo: Grifols: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Octapharma: Other: Attendance Grant; Amgen: Honoraria; Sobi: Other: Attendance Grant; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Terriou: Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Haioun: Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Honoraria, Research Funding; Servier: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Miltenyi: Honoraria, Research Funding. Michel: Amgen,Novartis,UCB,Argenx,Rigel: Honoraria. Godeau: Amgen: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Grifols: Consultancy; Sobi: Consultancy. Mahevas: GSK: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria.

Transcriptome Profiling of Pediatric Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Demonstrates Dysregulation of Platelet-Relevant Genes and Enrichment of Inflammatory and JAK2 Mediated Complement Pathways

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 4203-4203
Author(s):  
Nicole Kucine ◽  
Amanda R. Leonti ◽  
Aishwarya Krishnan ◽  
Rhonda E. Ries ◽  
Ross L. Levine ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Platelet Activation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Mononuclear Cells ◽  
Myeloproliferative Neoplasms ◽  
Differentially Expressed ◽  
Rna Seq ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Normal Controls

Introduction : Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are rare clonal bone marrow disorders in children characterized by high blood counts, predisposition to clotting events, and the potential to transform to myelofibrosis or acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Children with MPNs have lower rates of the known driver mutations (in JAK2, MPL, and CALR) than adult patients, and the underlying pathways and molecular derangements in young patients remain unknown. Given the lack of knowledge about pediatric MPNs, it is critical that we gain a better understanding of the dysregulated pathways in these diseases, which is necessary for improving disease understanding and broadening treatment options in children. Therefore, the objective of this work was to identify differentially expressed genes and pathways between children with MPNs and healthy controls, as well as children with AML, to guide further study. Methods : Mononuclear cells were extracted from peripheral blood of pediatric MPN patients (n=20) and pediatric and young adult AML patients (n=1410), and bone marrow of normal controls (NC, n=68). AML patient samples were being evaluated as part of a Children's Oncology Group planned analysis. To identify an expression profile unique to MPNs, transcriptome data from MPN patients was contrasted against NC and AML patients. All samples were ribodepleted and underwent Illumina RNA-Seq to generate transcriptome expression data. All analyses were performed in R. Differentially expressed genes were identified using the voom function from the limma package (v. 3.38.3), and enriched pathways were identified using the pathfindR package (v. 1.3.1). Unsupervised hierarchical clustering and heatmap generation was performed using the ComplexHeatmap package (v. 1.20.0). Results : MPN patient samples showed a unique expression signature, distinct from both AML patients and normal controls. Unsupervised PCA plot (Figure 1A) and heatmaps (Figure 1B) show that MPN samples cluster together. There were 4,012 differentially expressed (DE) genes in MPNs compared to NC and 6,743 DE genes in MPNs compared to AML patients. There were 2,493 shared genes between the 2 groups (Figure 1C.) Significantly DE genes between MPNs and other groups included multiple platelet-relevant genes including PF4 (CXCL4), PF4V1, P2RY12, and PPBP (CXCL7). Interestingly, PF4V1 was the most DE gene in MPNs compared to AML, and third highest versus NC. Dysregulation of some of these genes has been seen in adult MPNs, as well as thrombosis. Further comparison of transcriptome profiles between children with (n=13) and without (n=7)JAK2 mutations showed upregulation of three genes, CFB, C2, and SERPING1, which are all known complement genes, implicating complement activation in JAK2-mutated MPN patients. Complement activation has previously been reported in adult MPNs. Pathway enrichment analysis shows a number of immune and inflammatory pathways as enriched in MPN patients compared to both AML and NC. There were 179 enriched pathways in MPNs compared to AML and 142 compared to NC, with 134 common pathways (Figure 1D.) The systemic lupus erythematosus pathway was the most heavily enriched pathway in MPNs compared to both AML and NC. Additional pathways with significant enrichment include hematopoietic cell lineage, cytokine-cytokine interactions, DNA replication, and various infection-relevant pathways. The JAK-STAT signaling pathway was also enriched in MPNs compared to both AML and NC, as was the platelet activation pathway. Conclusion: Transcriptome evaluation of childhood MPNs shows enrichment of numerous inflammatory and immune pathways, highlighting that, as in adult MPNs, inflammation is implicated in pediatric MPNs. Furthermore, specific complement genes were upregulated in JAK2-mutant MPN. Upregulation of platelet-specific genes implies potential insights into disease mechanisms and warrants more study. Variations in the cell populations may account for some of the differences seen, however all samples were largely mononuclear cells, making their comparisons reasonable. Further analysis of this early data is needed to better assess inflammatory changes and platelet activation in pediatric MPNs, as are larger sample sizes. Individual cells may have differential expression of various genes, and future experiments with single-cell RNA-seq would be helpful to further elucidate differences. Disclosures Levine: Novartis: Consultancy; Loxo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; Lilly: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Qiagen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Imago Biosciences: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; C4 Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Prelude Therapeutics: Research Funding; Isoplexis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Phase II Trial of Single Agent Panobinostat (LBH589) In Relapsed or Relapsed/Refractory Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 3952-3952 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irene Ghobrial ◽  
Tiffany Poon ◽  
Meghan Rourke ◽  
Stacey Chuma ◽  
Janet Kunsman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Bone Marrow Involvement ◽  
Ct Scans ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Bone Marrow Biopsies ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 3952 Introduction: This study aimed to determine the safety and activity of panobinostat (LBH589) in patients with relapsed or relapsed/refractory Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia (WM). This was based on our preclinical studies showing that panobinostat induces significant activity in cell lines and patient samples. Methods: Eligibility criteria include: 1) patients with relapsed or relapsed/refractory WM with any prior lines of therapy, 2) measurable disease and symptomatic disease, 3) off prior chemotherapy> 3 weeks, or biological/novel therapy for WM > 2 weeks. Patients received panobinostat at 30 mg three times a week (Mondays, Wed and Fridays). Patients were assessed after every cycle for the first 6 cycles and then every 3 months thereafter. Subjects who had response or stable disease were allowed to continue on therapy until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. A planned restaging was performed at the end of cycle 6 including CT scans and bone marrow biopsies. Results: Twenty-seven patients have been enrolled to date. The median age is 62 years (47-80), the median lines of prior therapy is 3 (range, 1–7). All of the patients received prior rituximab. The median hemoglobin at screening is 10.3 g/dL (range 8.2–14.3), the median IgM M-spike by protein electropheresis at study entry is 1.9 g/dL (range, 0.63–5.1), and median serum IgM at baseline is 3610 mg/dL (range, 804- 10, 300). The median bone marrow involvement at enrollment was high for patients with WM, 50%, range (5-95%), with more than 10 patients having 70% or higher bone marrow involvement at baseline. The median number of cycles on therapy is 4 (range 1 – 12). 4 of the patients came off due to toxicity. Minimal response (MR) or better has been achieved in 15 (60%) of patients, with 6 (24%) PR, 9 (36%) MR. In addition, 9 (36%) patients achieved stable disease and 1 (4%) showed progression. The median decrease in IgM is 1020 mg/dL (0- 3970 decrease in IgM) with a median % decrease of 37.13%. Responses were prompt. The median time to first response was 2 cycles (range, 2–4). Bone marrow biopsies at the end of study (or at 6 months follow up) are available on 7 patients, of which 3 showed a significant decrease in bone marrow involvement and 4 showed stable involvement. The 4 patients who had stable bone marrow disease showed 1 PR and 3 MR responses by paraprotein level. Grade 3 and 4 toxicities include 4 (15%) cases of anemia including 1 case of hemolytic anemia, 1 (3%) case of grade 4 leucopenia (but the patient had grade 3 leucopenia at baseline), 7 (26%) of neutropenia, 14 (52%) of thrombocytopenia, 1 (4%) grade 3 GI bleed due to thrombocytopenia, 1 (3%) Grade 4 hyperglycemia and 1 (3%) grade 3 syncope and 3 (27%) grade 3 fatigue. The most common grade 2 toxicities were thrombocytopenia, anemia, and fatigue. There were 5 (20%) cases of asymptomatic pulmonary infiltrates of ground glass opacity observed on routine CT scans in follow up. Of these, 3 came off study for other reasons not related to the pulmonary infiltrates, 1 received a course of corticosteroids and had improvement of infiltrates, and 1 had dose reduction of therapy. All patients except for 2 have been dose reduced due to thrombocytopenia, fatigue, diarrhea, or anemia. Dose reductions include 25 mg three times a week, 20 mg three times a week and 20 mg three times every other week. The protocol was amended to allow a starting dose of 25 mg three times a week, which is better tolerated than 30 mg in this patient population. Conclusions: Panobinostat is an active therapeutic agent in patients with relapsed or refractory WM, with an overall response rate of 60% in patients with relapsed or refractory WM. The dose schedule of 25 mg three times a week is better tolerated in this patient population. Further studies to include this agent in combination with rituximab or bortezomib are being evaluated. Disclosures: Ghobrial: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Anderson:Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Richardson:Keryx Biopharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Treon:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Genentech BiOncology, Biogen IDEC, Celgene, Novartis, Cephalon: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Research Funding; Novartis Corporation: Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding.

EBMT Risk Score for Pre Transplant Risk Assessment in Patients with Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 3094-3094 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zartash Gul ◽  
Hasan Khan ◽  
Qaiser Bashir ◽  
Nina Shah ◽  
Simrit Parmar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Risk Score ◽  
Cumulative Incidence ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Response Status

Abstract Abstract 3094 Background: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is a potentially curative treatment for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) but its use is limited by high non-relapse mortality (NRM). European Group for Bone Marrow transplant (EBMT) risk score is a validated predictor of outcome for patients undergoing allo-HCT for hematological malignancies. It takes into consideration patient's age, donor's gender and type, disease status and the interval from diagnosis to allo-HCT, with the score ranging from 0 to 7. We assessed the impact of EBMT risk score in MM patients undergoing allo-HCT. Methods: A total of 189 patients with MM who underwent HSCT between November 1985 and June 2010 at MD Anderson Cancer Center were included in the analysis. Results: Patient characteristics are summarized in Table 1. There were 110 males (58%) and 79 females (42%) with a mean age of 50 years (range 28–70). Donors were related in 146 patients (HLA-identical=131, 1 antigen mismatched (AGMM) = 5, 2 AGMM =1, 3AGMM=1, syngeneic=8) and unrelated in 43 patients (HLA identical= 37, 1AGMM=4, 2AGMM=1, unknown=1). One-hundred and twelve patients had prior autologous transplants (auto-HCT). Of these 83 had 1, 28 had 2 and 1 had 3 prior auto-HCT, respectively. Median time from diagnosis to allo-HCT was 24.7 months (range 3.3–232) and median overall follow up was 13 months (0.2–266). Overall 94 patients (49%) had progressed before last follow-up. Incidence of all-cause mortality was 138 (73.4%) with 69 (36%) of all deaths attributed to NRM. KM estimates of 2-year PFS and OS were 25% and 42%, and 5-year PFS and OS were 16% and 27%, respectively. Cumulative incidence (CI) of grade 2–4 and grade 3–4 acute graft versus host disease (aGVHD) was 33% and 13%, respectively. Cumulative incidence of overall and extensive chronic GVHD (cGVHD) was 47% and 17%, respectively. EBMT risk score was, 0–3 for 41 (21.7%), 4 for 72 (38.1%) 4 and 5–7 for 76 (40.2%) patients. EBMT risk score was higher for males, African-Americans and older allo-HCT recipients, patients with higher LDH levels (>618mg/dl), ß2-microglobulin >3.5mg/dl and patients with bone marrow plasmacytosis. Median PFS in patients with EBMT scores 0–3, 4 and 5–7 were 10.1, 8.4 and 6.4 months, respectively (P=0.0036). Median OS in patients with EBMT scores 0–3, 4 and 5–7 were 39, 15.8 and 9.6 months, respectively (p=0.001). Cumulative NRM in patients with EBMT scores 0–3, 4 and 5–7 were 37% (15/41), 36.1% (26/72) and 37.3% (28/75), respectively (p= 0.234). Cumulative incidence of progression in patients with EBMT scores 0–3, 4 and 5–7 were 36.5% (15/41), 50% (36/72) and 56.5% (43/76), p=0.119. Compared to those with EBMT risk score (0–3), individuals with EBMT risk scores >5 had a higher risk of all-cause mortality (HR 2.34, 95% CI 1.44–3.80), and disease progression (HR 3.06, 95% CI 1.67–5.61). Addition of ß2-microglobulin, BM plasma cells or prior response status alone or in combination with EBMT risk score significantly improved the discrimination properties of the model containing EBMT score alone (p<0.05). Conclusions: EBMT risk score is an independent predictor of survival in MM patients undergoing allo-HCT. Addition of myeloma-specific factors predictors (ß2-microglobulin, plasma cell infiltration and prior response status) to EBMT score significantly improves its prognostic impact. Disclosures: Giralt: Millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document