scholarly journals Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Diagnosed during Pregnancy: Therapy, Outcomes and Follow-up

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4255-4255 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ekaterina Chelysheva ◽  
Elisabetta Abruzzese ◽  
Delphine Rea ◽  
Dong-Wook Kim ◽  
Khamida Kazakbaeva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pregnancy Outcomes ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Basic Research ◽  
Late Pregnancy ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Basic Research Grant ◽  
Research Grant

Abstract Background Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) diagnosed during pregnancy is a rare situation with no standard treatment schemes. If a pregnancy is prolonged weighting the risks/benefits of therapy or observation without therapy is a complicated task. If a pregnancy is terminated a possibility of a further childbirth has to be judged. The course of the disease, treatment options and possible outcomes need to be known in these patients (pts) in the era of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Aim To describe pregnancy outcomes, therapy and follow-up in women with CML diagnosed during pregnancy in the era of TKIs Methods We made a search in the databases of pregnancy cases in CML pts after 2003 year, since the first TKI imatinib became available. The data were obtained from observational studies: CML pregnancy registries of Russian hematology society and ELN. Clinical and demographic characteristics of pts, therapy, monitoring, pregnancy outcomes and follow-up were analyzed. Results. We found that 48 of 199 women with CML and pregnancy were diagnosed as having CML during pregnancy in years 2006-2018. Median (Me) age at CML diagnosis was 26 years (range 19-39). All pts had a chronic phase of CML. Sokal score was low in 34(71%), intermediate in 9(19%) high in 4(8%) and not known in 1(2%) pt. CML was diagnosed during 1st, 2ndand 3rd trimester of pregnancy in 26(54%), 11(23%) and 11(23%) females, respectively. Elective abortion was done in 14 (29%) pts, 1(2%) pt had a miscarriage. All 15 pts started TKI therapy shortly after delivery. Me observation time after labour was 52 months (range 4-139). Imatinib (IM) and nilotinib (NIL) were used as 1st line therapy in 14 and 1 pt accordingly. Five pts were switched from IM to a second line TKI due to resistance in 3 pts and to physician choice in 2 pts. Deep molecular response (DMR or BCR-ABL≤0,01% IS) and major molecular response (MMR or BCR-ABL≤0,1% IS) was achieved in 6 and 5 pts. No molecular response 2 (MR2 or BCR-ABL≤1%) was reported in 4 pts with the follow-up of 24-184 months. One pt died due to CML progression in BC (resistant to IM, T315I mutation, relapsed after allogenic bone marrow transplant (BMT), pre ponatinib availability). Pregnancy was carried out in 33(71%) pts: in 11 of 26 pts with CML diagnosed at 1st trimester and in all 22 pts diagnosed at 2nd-3rd trimester. Pregnancy ended in labour in 32 pts while in 1 pt pregnancy was ongoing pregnancy (week 26th) at the time of evaluation. No therapy for whole pregnancy was in 14 pts: 1, 5 and 8 of them were diagnosed in 1st, 2nd and 3rd trimester accordingly. Therapy during pregnancy was started in 19 pts: 10, 6 and 3 pts with CML diagnosed in 1st, 2nd and 3rd trimester accordingly. Five pts got interferon (IFN) in 1st trimester and 3 of 5 were switched to IM in 2nd-3rd trimester. Four pts got hydroxyurea (HU) for 5-7 days in 1st-2nd trimester prior to any other therapy. Fourteen pts with no therapy in 1st trimester started therapy at late pregnancy: IM since 2nd-3rd trimester in 10 pts, HU in 3rd trimester in 1 pt. A total of 13 pts got IM with Me time of IM start at 18 weeks (range 16-35). Me time of observation after delivery was 52 months (range 4-139). Me time of delay in TKI administration after diagnosis was 7 weeks (range 1-51) and in total 12(36%) of 33 pts got IFN or HU before TKI. TKIs used as 1st line were as follows: IM, dasatinib and NIL in 30, 1 and 1 pts accordingly. Nine pts were further switched from IM to TKI2 as 2nd line due to resistance/suboptimal response. DMR and MMR was achieved in 11 and 17 pts accordingly, MR2 in 5 pts, no MR2 in 1 pt with short follow-up (4 months), 4 pts were too early to evaluate. Two pts were resistant to 2 lines of TKIs and died from disease progression; one of them had a BMT failure and 1 pt was non-compliant. Thirty three children were born (one twins): 17 boys and 16 girls, no births defects were observed. Seven newborns had a low birth weight (<2500g): 6 of them were exposed to IM at late pregnancy and 3 were born preterm at week 35-37. Follow-up of the children was uneventful. Eleven pts later had 13 pregnancies which ended in childbirth within Me 5 years (1-9 years) Conclusion CML may be diagnosed at any pregnancy stage and pregnancy termination/prolongation should be judged individually. A normal childbirth may take place including cases with use of IM at late pregnancy. It is reasonable to adjust therapy options to pregnancy trimester and to avoid potential teratogenic drugs at 1st trimester. A careful follow-up and timely monitoring of these cases is needed. Disclosures Chelysheva: Fusion Pharma: Other: provided consultations ; Bristol Myers Squibb: Other: provided consultations and performed lectures; Novartis: Other: provided consultations and performed lectures. Abruzzese:Pfizer: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Ariad: Consultancy. Rea:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria. Kim:BMS: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Ilyang: Research Funding. Chabaeva:Russian Foundation for Basic Research grant 18-015-00399 A: Research Funding. Kulikov:Russian Foundation for Basic Research grant 18-015-00399 A: Research Funding. Turkina:Novartis: Other: provided consultations; Bristol Myers Squibb: Other: provided consultations; Phizer: Other: provided consultations; Fusion Pharma: Other: provided consultations.

scholarly journals Kinetics of the Leukemic Clone in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia during Pregnancy

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4254-4254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ekaterina Chelysheva ◽  
Jane Apperley ◽  
Elisabetta Abruzzese ◽  
Dong-Wook Kim ◽  
Konstantin Kotlyarchuk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Cumulative Incidence ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Late Pregnancy ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Deep Molecular Response ◽  
Leukemic Clone ◽  
Kinetics Of

Abstract Background Observation without treatment in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is suggested only for patients (pts) with a durable and stable deep molecular response (DMR). However, CML women with various grade of molecular response usually stop tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for conception/pregnancy and/or breastfeeding. The kinetics of the leukemic clone during these long interruptions needs to be understood in order to provide the optimal recommendations for the pts. Aim To analyze the loss and recovery of molecular response in CML pts with initial major molecular response (MMR) and deep molecular response (DMR) who had TKI interruptions during pregnancy. Patients and methods Pregnancy cases of women with BCR-ABL p210 transcript CML chronic phase and at least MMR before TKI interruption were included; cases with insufficient follow-up and previous bone marrow transplantation were excluded. Only cases with "ongoing pregnancy" or at term for pregnancy were evaluated as they had a valid off-treatment period. Data were obtained from observational studies of CML and pregnancy, like the CML pregnancy registries of Russian hematology society, and other institutional databases. Pregnancy cases were divided into 3 groups according to the molecular response before TKI interruption: 1) with DMR and "stop" criteria; 2) with DMR and no "stop" criteria; 3) with MMR only. DMR, MMR and molecular response 2 (MR2) were considered as BCR-ABL≤0,01%; BCR-ABL>0,01% and ≤0,1%; BCR-ABL>0,1% and ≤1% accordingly by international scale (IS). "Stop" criteria were considered as the main inclusion criteria of EURO-SKI multicenter "stop" trial: 1) treatment by TKIs for ≥3 years,2) stable DMR for ≥1 year before TKI cessation. Probability of MMR loss and recovery were evaluated by Cumulative incidence function (CIF) using Gray test for comparison. TKI restart without MMR loss and death were considered as competitors. The proportion of pts with MR2 loss during TKI interruption was additionally assessed. Results In total 227 pregnancies from 172 CML pts were evaluated and 87 cases were eligible for the analysis. Distribution by groups was as follows: 39, 26 and 22 cases in group 1, 2 and 3 accordingly. Median (Me) time without TKI therapy was 8 months (mo)(range 1-54) (table 1). In 72 (83%) cases TKIs were restarted after MMR loss (n=58) and without MMR loss (n=14). TKIs were restarted after and during pregnancy in 54 and 18 cases correspondingly. Imatinib and nilotinib were used at late pregnancy (2nd-3rd trimester) in 15 and 3 cases; no birth defects were observed. Seven pts got IFN during TKI interruption. TKIs were not restarted in 15 (17%) cases: 14 pts with DMR remained off-treatment after labour for a median of 29 mo (range 3-54) and in 1 pt with MMR loss pregnancy is ongoing. Cumulative incidence (CI) of MMR loss at 6 and 12 mo after TKI cessation was 57% and 66%, and CI of MMR recovery at 6 and 12 mo after TKI restart was 50% and 75% in the whole cohort. CI of MMR loss at 6 and 12 mo was 35%, 65%, 86% and 46%, 76%, 86% in group 1,2 and 3 accordingly. CI of MMR recovery at 6 and 12 mo was 75%, 55%, 23% and 100%, 73% and 55% in group 1,2 and 3, respectively. CI of MMR recovery in group 2 and 3 at 24 mo after TKI restart was 86% and 78%. Significant differences (p<0,05%) were found between all groups for MMR loss and MMR recovery except the MMR recovery rates between groups 2 and 3 (figure 1). In 45 (52%) cases MR2 was lost simultaneously with MMR loss or after it (table 1). In 4 (5%) cases a complete hematologic response (CHR) was lost after MR2 loss; however, a MMR was regained in 2 of 4 pts. Two more pts with MR2 and CHR loss died later from progression of CML: 6 mo and approximately 8 years after labour. Both of them were non-compliant to therapy and stopped treatment again by self-made decisions with no control follow-up. Conclusions CML pts with DMR and "stop" criteria have the best chance to keep MMR during pregnancy after TKI cessation and may remain without treatment after labour. MMR is lost in the majority of pts with MMR/DMR and no "stop" criteria. However, the loss of response is reversible and MMR can be recovered within 1-2 years after TKI resuming in spite of even MR2 loss. Our data confirm the option for planning pregnancy not only in CML pts with stable DMR but also in pts who have a MMR only or non-stable DMR followed up by a careful molecular monitoring during and after pregnancy. The use of TKI during at late pregnancy will be discussed. Disclosures Chelysheva: Novartis: Other: provided consultations and performed lectures; Bristol Myers Squibb: Other: provided consultations and performed lectures; Fusion Pharma: Other: provided consultations . Apperley:Incyte: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Abruzzese:Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Ariad: Consultancy. Kim:Pfizer: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Ilyang: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding. Shukhov:Bristol Myers Squibb: Other: provided consultations and performed lectures ; Novartis: Other: provided consultations and performed lectures . Turkina:Novartis: Other: provided consultations; Bristol Myers Squibb: Other: provided consultations; Phizer: Other: provided consultations; Fusion Pharma: Other: provided consultations.

scholarly journals Second Treatment Free Remission after Combination Therapy with Ruxolitinib Plus Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML)

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2555-2555
Author(s):  
Kendra Sweet ◽  
Ehab L. Atallah ◽  
Jerry P. Radich ◽  
Mei-Jie Zhang ◽  
Eva Sahakian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Treatment Free Remission ◽  
One Year

Abstract Background: Discontinuation of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is feasible in a subset of CML patients who have maintained a deep molecular response for at least two years. Numerous discontinuation trials have been performed and consistently show approximately 50% of patients relapse after stopping TKIs. A recent study examining rates of treatment free remission (TFR) after a second attempt at stopping TKIs found, with a median follow up time of 38.3 months, 64.3% of patients had a molecular relapse (defined as a loss of major molecular response (MMR)). At 12, 24 and 36 months, TFR rates were 48%, 42% and 35%, respectively. These data suggest some patients with a history of molecular relapse upon TKI cessation could successfully stop treatment on a subsequent attempt, yet the majority will relapse a second time. 'Complete eradication' of CML remains elusive in most patients likely as a result of minimal residual disease (MRD), which is the result of BCR-ABL independent drug resistance. More specifically, CML cells that reside in sanctuary sites such as the bone marrow adhere to fibronectin and demonstrate cell adhesion mediated drug resistance (CAM-DR). The bone marrow microenvironment contains many cytokines and growth factors capable of inducing STAT3-Y705 phosphorylation via the JAK-STAT pathway leading to protection against TKI-induced cell death. Inhibiting JAK2 and TYK2 leads to complete inhibition of pSTAT3-Y705, thereby implicating the role of activation of JAK2 and TYK2 in STAT3-Y705 phosphorylation and resistance towards BCR-ABL TKI-induced cell death. A phase I clinical trial combined ruxolitinib, which inhibits JAK2 and TYK2, plus nilotinib in chronic phase (CP) CML patients and found that ruxolitinib 15mg PO BID was safe and well tolerated with 4/10 patients achieving undetectable BCR-ABL1 transcripts by PCR. Study Design and Methods: This single arm phase II study (NCT03610971) will enroll 41 subjects from the H Jean Khoury Cure CML Consortium. Eligible subjects must have a confirmed diagnosis of CP-CML and have previously attempted to discontinue TKI therapy per NCCN guidelines and had molecular recurrence, defined as loss of MMR, and were restarted on TKI. This trial combines ruxolitinib 15mg BID plus BCR-ABL TKI (imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib or bosutinib) for 12 28-day cycles in the combination treatment phase (CTP). RQ-PCR to measure BCR-ABL transcripts will be checked at screening and every three months during the CTP. In the event that a subject experiences intolerance to a TKI, has confirmed loss of MMR, or loss of MR4.5 (&gt;0.0032% IS) on two central PCR results, or discontinues ruxolitinib, the subject will be removed from CTP and enter into long term follow-up (LTFU). CTP phase will be followed by further RQ-PCR screening for the concurrent TFR phase. At this time ruxolitinib will be discontinued and any subject who has met the criteria for the TFR phase will be enrolled. During the TFR phase, subjects will discontinue their TKI and be monitored off treatment with RQ-PCR checked monthly for the first year, every six weeks for year two, and every 12 weeks during year three. Upon molecular recurrence, defined as loss of MMR, TKIs will be restarted. The primary endpoint is the 12-month TFR rate subsequent to completion of 12 cycles of combination therapy; however, subjects will remain in the TFR phase for three years. Therefore, the total duration of the trial will be approximately five years (one year on CTP + three years in the TFR phase + one-year LTFU). Study statistical design was calculated to yield a one-sided type I error rate of 0.025 and power of 65% when the true one-year relapse rate is 35%. This study will additionally assess patient-reported outcomes in conjunction with RQ-PCR testing. PROMIS and other measures will be self-administered through REDCap. Correlative studies will include comparing changes in pSTAT3 in K562 and KU812 cell lines using plasma from CML patients being treated with TKIs plus ruxolitinib, using the plasma inhibitory assay technique. Changes in pSTAT3 and pSTAT5 will be correlated with clinical response and rate of TFR. Additional correlatives include multiparameter flow-based assessment of the T-cell compartment (activity/polarization) as well as natural killer cell fractions in CML patients at various time points (TKIs alone, TKIs plus ruxolitinib and during TFR). Thus far, 14 patients have been enrolled. Disclosures Sweet: Astellas: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AROG: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Meyers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Atallah: Amgen: Consultancy; BMS: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Radich: Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Thompson: Novartis/ Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Mauro: Pfizer: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sun Pharma / SPARC: Research Funding. Pinilla Ibarz: AbbVie, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Novartis, TG Therapeutics, Takeda: Consultancy, Other: Advisory; Sellas: Other: ), patents/royalties/other intellectual property; MEI, Sunesis: Research Funding; AbbVie, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Takeda: Speakers Bureau. OffLabel Disclosure: Ruxolitinib is being used off-label in chronic myeloid leukemia

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of Bosutinib in Previously Treated Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Final Results from the Byond Trial

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1475-1475
Author(s):  
Carlo Gambacorti-Passerini ◽  
Tim H Brümmendorf ◽  
Elisabetta Abruzzese ◽  
Kevin R. Kelly ◽  
Vivian G. Oehler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Publicly Traded ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Previously Treated Patients ◽  
Previously Treated

Abstract Introduction: Bosutinib is approved for patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) resistant/intolerant to prior therapy and patients with newly diagnosed Ph+ chronic phase (CP) CML. The phase 4 BYOND trial (NCT02228382) further evaluated the efficacy and safety of bosutinib in patients with previously treated CML. We report the final results from BYOND. Methods: Patients with CML resistant/intolerant to previous tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy received bosutinib 500 mg once daily. This final analysis was based on a November 23, 2020 database lock, after 3 years of follow-up. Results: Of 163 patients who received bosutinib, 156 had Ph+ CP CML; 4 patients with accelerated phase CML and 3 with Ph−/BCR-ABL1+ CML were analyzed separately. At study completion (median follow-up, 47.8 months), 48.1% of patient with Ph+ CP CML were still receiving treatment, and 68.6% completed the study. Most common primary reason for treatment discontinuation was adverse events (AEs) (26.9% [n=42/156]). Median treatment duration was 40.9 months (range, 0.2−50.1) and median dose intensity 306.4 mg/day (range, 79.7−560.6). Dose interruptions due to AEs occurred in 76.3% of patients and dose reductions in 79.5% of patients. Dose reduction (without further reduction) to 400, 300, or 200 mg/day occurred in 35 (22.4%), 46 (29.5%), and 38 (24.4%) patients, respectively. In evaluable patients with Ph+ CP CML, 81.1% (95% CI: 73.7-87.2), 71.8% (95% CI: 63.9-78.9), 59.7% (95% CI: 51.4-67.7) and 48.3% (95% CI: 40.1−56.6) attained or maintained complete cytogenetic response, major molecular response (MMR), MR 4, and MR 4.5 respectively, at any time on treatment. The majority of patients achieved a deeper molecular response relative to baseline while on bosutinib (Table 1). Among responders, the Kaplan-Meier probabilities (95% CI) of maintaining MMR and MR 4 at 36 months were 87.2% (78.0−92.7) and 80.7% (69.4−88.1), respectively. No patients with Ph+ CP CML progressed to accelerated/blast phase on-treatment. At 48 months, the cumulative incidence of progression free-survival events was 5.1% (95% CI: 2.4-9.4) and the Kaplan-Meier overall survival rate 88.3% (95% CI: 81.8-92.6). There were 17 deaths; 2 were considered CML-related (off-treatment progression to AP/BP, n=1; cardiogenic shock, n=1) and none were considered to be treatment-related by the investigator. In the overall patient population (N=163), any grade treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were reported by 99.4% of patients and grade 3/4 TEAEs were reported by 79.1% of patients (Table 2). Most common (≥10%) TEAEs leading to dose reduction were diarrhea (27.0%) and increased ALT (12.3%) and most common TEAEs leading to temporary dose interruption were diarrhea (30.7%), increased ALT (14.7%), vomiting (13.5%), increased AST (11.0%), and nausea (10.4%). AEs leading to treatment discontinuation in ≥2% of patients were increased ALT (4.9%) and AST (2.5%). Conclusions: After 3 years, bosutinib continued to show efficacy in previously treated patients with Ph+ CP CML. Long-term AEs were generally manageable and consistent with previous reports of bosutinib. These results confirm the use of bosutinib as a standard of care in previously treated patients with CML. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Gambacorti-Passerini: Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy. Brümmendorf: Bristol Myers: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Repeat Diagnostics: Research Funding; Takepart Media: Honoraria. Abruzzese: Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria. Kelly: Takeda: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Sanofi-Aventis: Consultancy; Denovo Biopharma: Consultancy; Verastem: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Berkley Lights: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Agios: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Bayer: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Epizyme: Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics: Speakers Bureau; Karyopharm: Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Speakers Bureau. Oehler: OncLive: Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy; Pfizer: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy. Garcia-Gutiérrez: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Pfizer: Research Funding. Hjorth-Hansen: Pfizer: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; AOP: Research Funding. Leip: Pfizer: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Purcell: Pfizer: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Luscan: Pfizer: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Viqueira: Pfizer: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Giles: Novartis: Consultancy; Actutate Therapeutics: Current Employment; Epigene Therapeutics: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Hochhaus: Pfizer: Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding.

scholarly journals A Retrospective Analysis about Frequency of Monitoring in Italian Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients after Discontinuation

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 4153-4153
Author(s):  
Matteo Emidio Dragani ◽  
Giovanna Rege Cambrin ◽  
Paola Berchialla ◽  
Irene Dogliotti ◽  
Gianantonio Rosti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Major Molecular Response ◽  
Molecular Monitoring ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Tki Discontinuation

Background: Successful tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs) discontinuation has been obtained in some patients (pts) with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML). Careful molecular monitoring after discontinuation is the key to guarantee the safety, in terms of prompt resumption of therapy according to retreatment threshold criteria. It was observed that the majority of relapses usually occur during the first 6 months after TKI discontinuation [Saussele S, Lancet Oncol 2018; Etienne G, JCO 2017], accounting for the monthly quantitative PCR (qPCR) that all prospective protocols included in the trial design at least during the first half-year. Two studies [Kong HJ, Cancer 2017; Shanmuganathan N, Blood 2019] investigated if performing molecular analysis with a different and less "cautious" timeframe yields comparable efficacy with logistical issues reduction. Here we retrospectively evaluated how molecular monitoring has been conducted in Italy on a cohort of patients not included in any prospective trial with follow-up visits. Methods: The outcome of Italian patients with CP-CML who discontinued TKIs per clinical practice has recently been reported [Fava C, Haematologica 2019]. For the purpose of the present study, all the 32 participating centers were required to provide dates and molecular results available for each enrolled patient in the first 24 months after TKI stop. Descriptive analysis was carried out. The average time to the loss of major molecular response (MMR), the frequency of the visits (monitoring) and the occurrence of loss of MMR within the first 6 months, between 6-12 months, and 13-24 months were computed. When appropriate non-parametric tests were used to test for differences. Results: 227 chronic phase CML pts were included in this sub-analysis. Median age at TKI discontinuation was 58.73 years and median follow up since TFR was 2.03 years. In this timeframe every patient had a mean of 7.95 appointments for molecular evaluation. Overall, 1804 analysis were performed, of which 18.2% happened in the first three months and 38.2% in the first six months. During the first three months of TKI discontinuation, 40 pts (17.6%) didn't have any molecular assessment; 78 pts (34.4%) had only 1 qPCR performed, 77 pts (33.9%) 2 qPCR, 31 pts (13.7%) 3 qPCR and 1 pt (0.4%) 4 qPCR. For the first six months after TKI stop, 7 pts (3.1%) didn't undergo any BCR-ABL1 evaluation; 37 pts (16.3%) had only 1 analysis, 60 pts (26.4%) 2 analysis, 37 pts (16.3%) 3 analysis, 28 pts (12.3%) were evaluated 4 times, 40 pts (17.6%) 5 times, 17 pts (7.5%) 6 times and only 1 pt (0.4%) 7 times. The majority of visits fell between the 3rd and the 7th month after TKI interruption (Figure 1) with 84 pts (52.2%) being evaluated at month 3, 96 pts (59.6%) at month 4, 80 pts (49.7%) at month 5, 89 pts (55.3%) at month 6, 101 pts (62.7%) at month 7. In the first six months the visits occurred with a mean interval of 1.44 months; between months 7-12 molecular evaluations were performed every 1.94 months; during the second year of discontinuation (months 13-24) every 2.89 months (p<0.001). Seventy-one pts lost major molecular response (MMR) in a mean time of 5.56 months. As expected, 55 pts (77.5%) lost MMR during the first six months whereas 16 pts (22.6%) relapsed later on: 3 pts (4.2) relapsed during the first month, 7 pts (9.9%) after two months, 13 pts (18.3%) after three, 19 pts (26.8%) after four, 8 pts (11.3%) after five months and 5 pts (7%) at six months. Only 6 patients lost MMR after 12 months of follow-up in TFR. All patients regained at least MMR after TKI resumption, and no progression occurred. Finally, we evaluated the number of patients who would experience a delay in the diagnosis of MMR loss if a three-months monitoring schedule was adopted. In the first 6 months, 15 pts (27.3%) would have a one month delay, 22 (40%) a 2 months delay; 18 pts (32.7%) would have a right timing. Very few patients would experience a delay in the following months (Figure 2). Discussion: The safety of TFR relies consistently on the management of patients off-therapy especially during the first 6 months, when molecular relapses more often occur. Our retrospective analysis showed that a less intense frequency of monitoring did not affect the success of TFR nor put pts at risk of progression. However, these data confirm that the first 6 months off-treatment require a more stringent follow-up for early detection of MMR loss. Disclosures Rosti: BMS: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Castagnetti:Novartis: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squiib: Consultancy, Honoraria. Capodanno:Novartis: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria. Ferrero:Novartis: Honoraria. Crugnola:Novartis: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria. Elena:Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Breccia:Pfizer: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria. Iurlo:Novartis: Other: Speaker Honoraria; Pfizer: Other: Speaker Honoraria; Incyte: Other: Speaker Honoraria. Bocchia:BMS: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Lunghi:Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria. Cedrone:BMS: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Sgherza:Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria. Santoro:Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria. Giai:Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria. Caocci:Novartis: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Levato:Incyte: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria. Abruzzese:BMS: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Saglio:Pfizer: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Jansen: Consultancy; Ariad: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy. Fava:Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria.

scholarly journals FINAL Analysis of a PAN European STOP Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Trial in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia : The EURO-SKI Study

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 633-633
Author(s):  
Francois-Xavier Mahon ◽  
Johan Richter ◽  
Andreas Hochhaus ◽  
Panayiotis Panayiotidis ◽  
Antonio Medina de Almeida ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Molecular Test ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Tki Treatment

Abstract Background: With the dramatic success of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) to treat Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), the life expectancy of CML patients is now close to that of the general population. In addition, treatment cessation is now a realistic goal for some CML patients. This was shown by several clinical trials such as the STIM study leading to the concept of TFR (treatment free remission). Around 40-60% of patients with stable DMR [deep molecular response, corresponding to &lt;0.01% BCR-ABL (IS)] can stop the TKI successfully, e.g. in accordance with recommendations from the European LeukemiaNet. In the interim analysis of the first 200 patients of the EURO-SKI (European Stop TKI) trial, 62% were in major molecular response (MMR: &lt;0.1% BCR-ABL1 IS) at 6 months. DMR duration before TKI stop was most predictive for maintenance of MMR. Here we present the final analysis of the EURO-SKI trial after 3 years of follow-up. Aims: The main objectives of The EURO-SKI trial were the evaluation of molecular recurrence-free survival (MRecFS) after Stopping TKI in a large Pan-european cohort of CML patients and definition of prognostic markers to increase the rate of patients in durable deep MR after stopping TKI. Further aims are the evaluation of harmonized methods of molecular monitoring. Methods: Adult CML patients in chronic phase CML on TKI treatment in confirmed DMR for at least one year (confirmed by three consecutive PCR tests) and under TKI treatment for at least 3 years were eligible. DMR confirmation was performed in standardized laboratories. Primary endpoint was maintenance of MMR after stopping TKI. According to protocol, a 36 months follow-up was planned. The null hypotheses were that MMR maintenance at 6 and 36 months was less or equal than 40% and less or equal than 35%, respectively. Results: Between May 2012 and December 2014, 868 patients were pre-registered by 61 centers from 11 countries. 140 pts were excluded (consent withdrawal n=1, protocol violation n=38, not eligible n=74, DMR not confirmed n=11, atypical/unknown transcript n=15, missing data n=1) resulting in 728 eligible patents. Of these, 46.8% were female. Median age at diagnosis was 52 years (range, 11 to 85 years). Median duration of TKI treatment was 7.5 years (range, 3.0-14.1 years) and median duration of MR4 before TKI cessation was 4.7 years (range, 1.0-13.3 years). Nine patients died without MMR loss (none CML related), 15 patients restarted TKI without MMR loss. At 6 months, 713 patients were available (without molecular test at 6 months: n=6, TKI restart without relapse: n=9). Since 434 patients (61%) [95% CI: 57-64] remained without relapse during the first 6 months, the null hypothesis was rejected (p&lt;0.0001). At 36 months, 678 patients could be analyzed (TKI restart without relapse: n=17, no molecular test at 36 months: n=33). With 309 patients in MMR, corresponding to 46% [95% CI: 42-49], the null hypothesis of 35% or less was rejected (p&lt;0.0001). MRecFS at 36 months resulted in 48% (CI: 44-52%) and molecular recurrence- and treatment-free survival (MRecTFS) in 46% (CI: 43-50%) (Fig 1). No blast crisis occurred. Regarding prognostic factors, we confirmed that TKI treatment duration and DMR duration were still the most important factors to predict MMR loss at 6 months. For the late recurrence, i.e., between 6 and 36 months (57 patients), TKI treatment duration before stop was the only relevant variable in a preliminary univariate logistic analysis. Summary/Conclusion: With this final analysis of the largest TFR trial, we confirm the MRecFS and MRecTFS rates at 6 months previously obtained from the interim analysis. However, late molecular recurrence (15% between 6 and 36 months) occurred and the underlying mechanisms need to be discussed. Nevertheless, 46% of the patients, were still in MRecTFS at 3 years. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Hochhaus: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding. Hjorth-Hansen: AOP: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. Mustjoki: Novartis: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Janpix: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. Martínez-López: Roche, Novartis, Incyte, Astellas, BMS: Research Funding; Janssen, BMS, Novartis, Incyte, Roche, GSK, Pfizer: Consultancy. Nicolini: Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel, accommodations, expenses, Research Funding; Incyte Biosciences: Honoraria, Other: travel, accommodations, expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Kartos Therapeutics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sun Pharma Ltd.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Honoraria. Saussele: Roche: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Venetoclax and Azacitidine for Older Newly Diagnosed Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Single-Institution Pilot Study Using Measurable Residual Disease to Guide Therapy

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2638-2638 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanda Winters ◽  
Jonathan A Gutman ◽  
Enkhtsetseg Purev ◽  
Brett M. Stevens ◽  
Shanshan Pei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Refractory Disease ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Ras Pathway ◽  
Measurable Residual Disease ◽  
Count Recovery

Background: Venetoclax (ven) was approved for older untreated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients due to high response rates and durable remissions. As a participating site in the dose escalation study, we observed deeper/more durable responses in some who received >400mg ven. We also noted 16/33 discontinued azacitidine (aza) after achieving a response; 9 relapsed and 7 remained in long term remission on ven only. Based on these observations, we designed a study that hypothesized: A)Higher initial doses of ven would allow deeper/more durable responses, and B)Multi modality high sensitivity measurable residual disease (MRD) testing could identify patients able to discontinue aza and remain on maintenance ven. Methods: This is an ongoing phase 2 study (NCT03466294) of 42 untreated AML patients ≥60 who decline/are ineligible for induction. Patients have adequate organ function and white blood cell counts <25x109/L (hydrea permitted). In cycle 1, patients receive aza 75mg/m2 on days (d) 1-7 and ven, escalated from 100 to 200 to 400 to 600mg on d 1-4. Ven continues at 600mg d 5-28 and bone marrow biopsies (BMBXs) are performed on d 8 and 28. Patients who achieve morphologic remission without count recovery have up to 14 days off therapy before subsequent cycles, with growth factor support; "upgraded" responses are recorded if count recovery occurs. Non responders discontinue or receive up to two additional cycles of aza and ven 600mg. Responders who remain MRD+ by multiparameter flow cytometry (MPFC, Hematologics) and/or digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) for as many identifiable diagnostic genes as possible also receive up to 2 additional cycles of aza and ven 600mg. MRD+ responders after 3 cycles continue aza and ven 400mg until toxicity/progression. Patients who experience MRD- responses at any time stop aza and continue ven 400mg daily (Fig 1). Results: 30 patients enrolled between May 2018 and July 2019; median age is 71 (60-88), 10% evolved from MDS and 10% and 73% had intermediate and unfavorable risk disease by ELN, respectively (Table 1). 732 adverse events (AEs) occurred; 46 (6%) were serious, the most common were neutropenic fever (37%) and pneumonia (13%). The most common >grade 2 related AEs were leukopenia (53%), thrombocytopenia (44%) and neutropenia (35%); there were no related grade 5 AEs. The overall response rate was 70% (21/30; CR=19, MLFS=2). Median number of cycles to achieve best response was 1. Significant blast reductions were seen on day 8; of the 28 with interpretable day 8 BMBXs, 10 achieved MLFS on day 8. 4 completed ≥1 cycle and were refractory. An additional 4 did not complete cycle 1: 1 died of disease and 3 elected to come off therapy (all subsequently died of disease). Four (19%) responders relapsed, after a median 180 days (27-279). With median follow up of 214 days, median response duration has not been reached. 10 patients died, after a median 65 days (29-256); 1/30 died within 30 days. Median overall survival has not been reached. Of the 26 who completed ≥1 cycle, 19 were MRD- by MPFC, including 18/19 who achieved CR. Of these 26, 3 were not monitored by ddPCR: for 2 patients this was due to the absence of detectable baseline mutations and for 1 patient it was due to refractory disease. The remaining 23 had ddPCR monitoring; 3 became MRD- by this modality (Fig 2). All 3 were also MRD- by MPFC and per protocol discontinued aza and initiated ven maintenance (Fig 1). MRD negativity by both parameters occurred after cycles 1, 2 and 3, respectively. One MRD- patient relapsed after 216 days; two remain in remission after 301 and 124 days. An additional 4 who achieved MRD+ responses discontinued aza at their insistence (and in violation of the protocol); 1 relapsed after 279 days, and 3 remain in ongoing remission. Univariate predictors of refractory disease were FAB M0/M1 (OR 0.070, p=0.02) and RAS pathway mutations (OR 14.25, p=0.02). Conclusions: Higher initial doses of ven are tolerated in this population. Blast reduction occurs quickly in many patients (day 8), for this low intensity regimen. Response rates are consistent with lower doses of ven. Very deep responses, as measured by highly sensitive MRD methods (MPFC and ddPCR are capable of sensitivity up to 0.02%), are attainable. Longer follow up time will determine if higher ven doses and MRD-driven decisions related to continuation of aza result in more durable responses. Increased maturation of blasts and RAS pathway mutations are predictors for refractory disease. Disclosures Lyle: Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daiichi Sankyo Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Pollyea:Agios: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celyad: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Diachii Sankyo: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Forty-Seven: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Dasatinib Is Well-Tolerated and Efficacious in Imatinib-Intolerant Patients with Chronic-Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CP-CML).

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 1128-1128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanna Jean Khoury ◽  
Michael J. Mauro ◽  
Yousif Matloub ◽  
Tai-Tsang Chen ◽  
Erkut Bahceci ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Median Duration ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Molecular Response

Abstract Abstract 1128 Poster Board I-150 Imatinib (IM), a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), has been the mainstay of treatment for chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML). However, IM resistance and intolerance are of considerable clinical relevance. Dasatinib (DAS), a second-line TKI, is effective in the IM-intolerant patient population. The purpose of this study was to determine baseline factors that can affect DAS response and evaluate long term efficacy in this population. Intolerance to IM was defined as ≥ Grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity and/or Grade 4 hematologic toxicity lasting > 7 days. A total of 271 Ph+ CP-CML IM-intolerant patients who received DAS were pooled from two randomized trials (Phase II-trial, CA 180013 and Phase III trial, CA 180034). DAS doses were 50 mg BID (n=43), 70 mg BID (n=141), 100 mg QD (n=43) or 140 mg QD (n=44). At baseline, the median duration of disease for the IM-intolerant patients was 24 months (range: 0.9-182.5) and the median duration of IM therapy was 9 months (range: 0.03-69.06). Of these patients, 46 (17%) had hematologic toxicity and 228 (84.1%) had non-hematologic toxicity to IM. Seventy-nine (29%) patients had prior complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) on IM and 171 (63%) patients did not. The data for prior CyR to IM was not reported for 21 (7.7%) patients. Of the 79 patients who had achieved CCyR on IM, 30 patients had maintained CCyR and 49 patients had lost this response prior to start of DAS. Of the 171 patients who did not achieve CCyR on IM, 62 (36.3%) had been on IM for 3 12 months and 109 (63.7%) for < 12 months. At 2-year follow up of the 271 patients treated with DAS, 121 (44.6%) discontinued DAS (7.4% due to hematologic toxicity and 14% due to non-hematologic toxicity). Of the patients who were intolerant of IM due to hematologic toxicity (n=46), 10 (21.7%) discontinued DAS due to hematologic toxicity, and 3 (6.5%) due to other toxicities. Of the patients with non-hematologic IM-intolerance (n=228), 10 (4.4%) discontinued DAS due to hematologic toxicity, and 35 (15.4%) due to other toxicities. The median average daily dose of DAS was 99 mg/day in the population who achieved CCyR on DAS and 71.5 mg/day in the population who did not achieve CCyR on DAS. The probability of achieving CCyR on DAS was 43.5% in patients with hematologic IM-intolerance versus 78.9% with non-hematologic IM-intolerance. The CCyR, major molecular response (MMR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) at 2-year follow up for the groups classified by their CCyR status at start of DAS or IM-intolerance status are summarized in Table 1. Conclusions DAS was well-tolerated and associated with high rates of CyR in IM-intolerant patients. Patients with a prior CCyR to IM and those who switched due to non-hematologic imatinib-intolerance had the highest rates of CCyR and MMR on DAS, while patients without CCyR after more than 12 months of IM therapy or IM-intolerance due to hematologic toxicity had the lowest rates of CCyR and MMR. Disclosures Khoury: BMS: Honoraria; Wyeth: Honoraria; Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Chemgenex: Honoraria; Genzyme: Honoraria. Mauro:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Matloub:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Employment. Chen:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Employment. Bahceci:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Employment. Deininger:Novartis: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Calistoga: Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding.

ENESTnd Update: Continued Superiority of Nilotinib Versus Imatinib In Patients with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia In Chronic Phase (CML-CP)

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 207-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy P. Hughes ◽  
Andreas Hochhaus ◽  
Giuseppe Saglio ◽  
Dong-Wook Kim ◽  
Saengsuree Jootar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Clonal Evolution ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Superior Efficacy ◽  
Rate Of Progression

Abstract Abstract 207 Background: Results from the phase 3, international, randomized ENESTnd trial have demonstrated the superior efficacy of nilotinib over imatinib with significantly higher rates of major molecular response (MMR), complete cytogenetic response (CCyR), and with significantly lower rates of progression to AP/BC on treatment. Here, we present data with a median follow-up of 18 months. Methods: 846 CML-CP patients were randomized to nilotinib 300 mg twice daily (bid) (n=282), nilotinib 400 mg bid (n=281), and imatinib 400 mg once daily (n=283). Primary endpoint was MMR (≤ 0.1% BCR-ABLIS) rate “at” 12 months, as previously presented. Key secondary endpoint was durable MMR at 24 months. Other endpoints assessed at 24 months include progression to AP/BC (with and without clonal evolution), event-free survival, progression-free survival, and overall survival (OS). Results: With a median follow-up of 18 months, the overall best MMR rate was superior for nilotinib 300 mg bid (66%, P < .0001) and nilotinib 400 mg bid (62%, P < .0001) compared with imatinib (40%). Superior rates of MMR were observed in both nilotinib arms compared with the imatinib arm across all Sokal risk groups (Table). The overall best rate of BCR-ABLIS ≤ 0.0032% (equivalent to complete molecular response, CMR) was superior for nilotinib 300 mg bid (21%, P < .0001) and nilotinib 400 mg bid (17%, P < .0001) compared with imatinib (6%). The overall best CCyR rate was superior for nilotinib 300 mg bid (85%, P < .001) and nilotinib 400 mg bid (82%, P=.017) compared with imatinib (74%). The superior efficacy of nilotinib was further demonstrated using the 2009 European LeukemiaNet (ELN) 12-month milestone in which fewer patients had suboptimal response or treatment failure on nilotinib 300 mg bid (2%, 3%) and nilotinib 400 mg bid (2%, 2%) vs imatinib (11%, 8%). Rates of progression to AP/BC on treatment were significantly lower for nilotinib 300 mg bid (0.7%, P=.006) and nilotinib 400 mg bid (0.4%, P=.003) compared with imatinib (4.2%). The rate of progression on treatment was also significantly lower for nilotinib when including clonal evolution as a criteria for progression (Table). There were fewer CML-related deaths on nilotinib 300 mg bid (n=2), and 400 mg bid (n=1) vs imatinib (n=8). Estimated OS rate (including data from follow-up after discontinuation) at 18 months was higher for nilotinib 300 mg bid (98.5%, P=.28) and nilotinib 400 mg bid (99.3%, P=.03) vs imatinib (96.9%). Both drugs were well-tolerated. Discontinuations due to adverse events or laboratory abnormalities were lowest for nilotinib 300 mg bid (7%) compared with nilotinib 400 mg bid (12%) and imatinib (9%). With longer follow up there has been minimal change in the occurrence of AEs. Minimum 24-month follow-up data for all patients will be presented. Conclusions: With longer follow-up, nilotinib was associated with a significantly lower rate of progression to AP/BC on treatment and lower rates of suboptimal response or treatment failure vs imatinib. Nilotinib resulted in fewer CML-related deaths and a higher OS rate vs imatinib. Nilotinib induced superior rates of MMR, CMR, and CCyR vs imatinib in patients with newly diagnosed CML-CP. Taken together, these data support nilotinib as a new standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed CML. Disclosures: Hughes: Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Meyers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Honoraria. Hochhaus:Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Saglio:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria. Kim:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. le Coutre:Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau. Reiffers:Novartis: Research Funding. Pasquini:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria. Clark:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Genzyme: Honoraria, Research Funding. Gallagher:Novartis Pharma AG: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hoenekopp:Novartis Pharma AG: Employment. Haque:Novartis: Employment. Larson:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Kantarjian:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding.

Outcome of Patients with Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive (Ph+) Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) with Relapse After Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (TKI) Therapy

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 1518-1518
Author(s):  
Hun Ju Lee ◽  
Susan O'Brien ◽  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Farhad Ravandi ◽  
Stefan Faderl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Salvage Therapy ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Major Molecular Response ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Cns Relapse ◽  
Complete Hematologic Response

Abstract Abstract 1518 Background: Treatment with TKIs has greatly improved the outcome of patients with Ph+ ALL. However, many patients treated with TKI-based therapy eventually have a relapse. The response to salvage therapy and long-term outcomes of these patients are unknown. Aims: Describe the outcomes of patients with Ph+ ALL with resistance to or relapse after frontline TKI-based chemotherapy. Methods: We analyzed the outcome of patients who were treated in clinical trials at our institution between February 2001 and July 2008 with TKI-based chemotherapy for newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL who had refractory or relapsed disease. Results: One hundred thirteen patients were treated with frontline hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and dexamethasone (HCVAD) plus imatinib (HCVAD+I; n=54) or HCVAD plus dasatinib (HCVAD+D; n=59). Of these, 35 (31%) experienced primary resistance (n=1) or relapse (n=34). The median age was 51 years [range (r): 20–85]; 12 patients (34%) were older than 60 years. Median follow-up was 21.1 mo (r: 4.2–56.7). Median white blood cell and platelet counts at diagnosis were 14.4 × 109/L (r: 1.2–292.9) and 48 × 109/L (r: 4–425), respectively. White blood cell count was >30 × 109/L in 13 patients (37%). Median peripheral and bone marrow blast percentages were 53% (r: 0–97%) and 80% (r: 1–98%), respectively. Twenty-two patients (63%) had received HCVAD+I and 13 (37%) HCVAD+D. Twenty-three patients (66%) had experienced first complete remission (CR1) with 1 cycle of induction. Median CR1 duration was 12 mo (r: 1.9–42). Four patients underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in CR1. ABL kinase domain mutations were investigated in 28 patients (80%) at relapse; 16 (57%) had mutations, including 5 (14%) with T315I (all had received HCVAD+D). Upon relapse, 31 patients received first salvage therapy (S1), 24 with chemotherapy [HCVAD+D, n=8; HCVAD+I, n=3; HCVAD+nilotinib (N), n=1; HCVAD+asparaginase (Asp), n=1; methotrexate, vincristine, Asp, and dexamethasone (MOAD), n=2; others, n=9]; 6 with a TKI only (I, n=2; D, n=1; N, n=1; others, n=2); and 1 with ASCT. Three patients were unfit for treatment. Median cycles of S1 were 2 (r: 1–8). Thirteen patients (42%) had second complete remission (CR2) (HCVAD+D, n=6; HCVAD+I, n=2; HCVAD+N, n=1; HCVAD+Asp, n=1; others, n=3). Median time to CR2 was 1.5 mo (r: 0.7–8.8). Five patients underwent ASCT in CR2. Median CR2 duration was 7.3 mo (r: 1.4–36.2). Complete cytogenetic response was seen in 11 patients (35%); major molecular response (BCR-ABL/ABL ratio <0.05%) in 9 (29%); and complete molecular response in 7 (22%); and complete hematologic response in 15 (48%). Times to complete cytogenetic response and complete molecular response were 1.3 mo (r: 0.7–10.6) and 3 mo (r: 1.5–8.7), respectively. Seven patients had second relapse. Fifteen patients (7 relapse, 8 refractory) received second salvage therapy (S2) with systemic chemotherapy (MOAD, n=2; phase I/single-agent TKI, n=8; others, n=5); 1 patient had solitary central nervous system (CNS) relapse treated with intrathecal cytarabine and methotrexate. CR3 was obtained in 1 patient, the patient with sole CNS relapse. Median disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) after S1 were 6.5 mo (r: 0.5–45) and 7.3 mo (r: 1.4–36.2), respectively. At last follow-up, 2 patients (6%) were alive and 33 had died, 11 (33%) of infectious complications, 5 (15%) of organ failure, 3 (9%) of bleeding complications, 2 (6%) of graft-versus-host disease complications, 2 (6%) of CNS relapse, and 10 (30%) of other or unknown causes. Median OS after S2 was 2.1 mo (r: 1.4–2.6). In univariate analysis, age >60 years was associated with worse OS after S1 [4.2 vs. 12.7 mo; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.8 to 6.7 vs. 7.5 to 17.9 (P=0.006)]. Complete hematologic response was associated with improved OS after S1 [15.4 vs. 4.3 mo; 95% CI 9.1 to 21.8 vs. 2.5 to 6.0 (P<0.001)]. Major molecular response was associated with improved OS after S1 [18.1 vs. 5.7 mo; 95% CI 9.3 to 26.8 vs. 3.6 to 7.8 (P=0.003)]. Choice of prior TKI (HCVAD+I vs. HCVAD+D) did not significantly influence CR and OS after relapse. Conclusion: Patients with refractory or relapsed Ph+ ALL after TKI-based therapy have poor outcome, particularly those who are older or have persistent BCR/ABL transcripts. New agents are needed to improve the outcome in this population. Disclosures: Kantarjian: BMS: Research Funding. Ravandi:Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria. Cortes:Chemgenex: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Ariad: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Switching to Nilotinib Is Associated with Continued Deeper Molecular Responses in CML-CP Patients with Minimal Residual Disease After ≥ 2 Years On Imatinib: Enestcmr 2-Year Follow-up Results

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 694-694 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy P. Hughes ◽  
Jeffrey H. Lipton ◽  
Nelson Spector ◽  
Brian Leber ◽  
Ricardo Pasquini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Molecular Responses ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Minimal Residual

Abstract Abstract 694 Background: Superior rates of deeper molecular responses were achieved with nilotinib vs imatinib in patients newly diagnosed with Philadelphia chromosome–positive (Ph+) chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) in the Evaluating Nilotinib Efficacy and Safety in Clinical Trials—newly diagnosed patients (ENESTnd) trial. In addition, the 12-month (mo) analysis of the ENEST—complete molecular response (ENESTcmr) study demonstrated that switching to nilotinib after a minimum of 2 years on imatinib led to increased rates of major molecular response (MMR) and deeper molecular responses vs remaining on imatinib. Results from ENESTcmr are presented here with minimum 24 mo of patient follow-up. Methods: Patients with Ph+ CML-CP who had achieved complete cytogenetic responses but still had persistent BCR-ABL positivity by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR) after ≥ 2 years on imatinib were eligible. Patients (n = 207) were randomized to switch to nilotinib 400 mg twice daily (BID; n = 104) or to continue on the same dose of imatinib (400 or 600 mg once daily [QD]; n = 103). Rates of MMR, MR4 (BCR-ABL ≤ 0.01% according to the International Scale [IS], corresponding to a 4-log reduction), MR4.5 (BCR-ABL ≤ 0.0032%IS, corresponding to 4.5-log reduction), and undetectable BCR-ABL via RQ-PCR with ≥ 4.5-log sensitivity were measured. Results: Among all randomized patients (intent-to-treat population), significantly more patients treated with nilotinib continued to achieve undetectable BCR-ABL by 24 mo (32.7% on nilotinib vs 16.5% on imatinib; P =.005; Table).The difference between the arms in achievement of this endpoint increased between 1 and 2 years (from 12.4% to 16.2%). The median time to MR4.5 and undetectable BCR-ABL was also significantly faster on nilotinib than on imatinib (P = .005 and .003, respectively). Cumulative rates of MR4.5 and undetectable BCR-ABL continued to be higher with nilotinib in patients without those responses at baseline, and the difference between arms appeared to increase over time. The safety profiles for nilotinib and imatinib were consistent with prior studies. By 24 mo, no patients in either arm progressed to accelerated phase/blast crisis. No patients on nilotinib died since the 12-mo analysis; 1 patient on imatinib died from metastatic prostate cancer in follow-up after discontinuation from the study. Conclusions: Switching to nilotinib led to significantly faster, deeper molecular responses in patients with minimal residual disease on long-term imatinib therapy. Since the 12-mo analysis, rates of deep molecular response (MR4.5 and undetectable BCR-ABL) have remained significantly higher in patients who did not have the response at baseline and were switched to nilotinib (vs those remaining on imatinib). In fact, the difference in favor of nilotinib increased between 1 and 2 years. These results suggest that switching to the more potent, selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor nilotinib is beneficial in patients with minimal residual disease after long-term imatinib therapy. Achievement of these deeper molecular responses (MR4.5 and undetectable BCR-ABL) after switching to nilotinib may enable a greater proportion of CML-CP patients to be eligible for future discontinuation studies. Cumulative rates of confirmed undetectable BCR-ABL by 24 mo will be presented as the confirmation assessments for several responders were not available at the time of this analysis. Disclosures: Hughes: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy; CSL: Research Funding. Lipton:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Spector:Novarits: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy. Leber:Novartis: Advisory Board Other, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Schwarer:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Etienne:Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Branford:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Research Funding. Purkayastha:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp: Employment. Collins:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp: Employment. Szczudlo:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp: Employment. Cervantes:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi-Aventis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Teva Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document