Periprocedural Interruption of Anticoagulation in Patients with Cancer-Associated VTE: An Analysis of Thrombotic and Bleeding Outcomes

Abstract Background: Approximately 10-20% of patients with venous thromboembolic events (VTE) have underlying malignancy. VTE is considered the second leading cause of death in patients with cancer, and patients with cancer-associated VTE are at higher risk of anticoagulant-related bleeding. Although patients with cancer often undergo diagnostic or therapeutic invasive procedures, there is a paucity of data on adverse outcomes following the periprocedural interruption of anticoagulation in this patient population. Methods: We did a single-center, retrospective chart review of consecutive patients with cancer-associated VTE who had periprocedural interruption of anticoagulation for invasive procedures between November 2015 and March 2018. Perioperative interruption of warfarin/low-molecular-weight heparin was done as per CHEST guidelines (Douketis et al. Chest 141(2 Suppl). Heparin bridging anticoagulation was used only for patients with recent (< 3 months) VTE. Perioperative interruption of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) was done as per Thrombosis Canada guidelines, with anticoagulation held for 3 half-lives prior to low bleeding risk procedures and 5 half-lives for high bleeding risk procedures. Active cancer was defined as per the HOKUSAI VTE CANCER trial (Raskob et al. NEJM 378(7)). Primary outcomes were 30-day post-operative rates of VTE and major bleeding. Secondary outcomes were 30-day post-operative rates of clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB) and mortality. Major bleeding and CRNMB were defined according to ISTH definitions. Data are reported on a per-interruption basis. Herein, we present an interim analysis of results. Results: To date, 82 perioperative interruptions are included, of whom 69.5% were receiving a DOAC. Mean age of the cohort was 65.8 years, 62.2% were male, 92.6% had active cancer and 41.5% had metastatic cancer. Thrombocytopenia (platelet count < 100 x 106/L) was present in 12.2% of interruptions. Procedures were stratified as high bleeding risk in 65.9% of cases. The 30-day rates of thromboembolism and major bleeding were both 3.70 % (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.25 to 10.2%), as was the 30-day rate of CRNMB. There were no deaths during the 30-day follow-up period. Conclusions: The periprocedural interruption of anticoagulation in patients with cancer-associated VTE appears to be associated with high rates of post-operative thrombotic and bleeding complications. Prospective studies are required to better quantify the risks of periprocedural anticoagulation interruption in this patient population. Disclosures Shaw: Portola Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Douketis:BMS: Other: Advisory Board; Janssen: Consultancy; Bayer: Other: Advisory Board; Pfizer: Other: Advisory Board; Daiichi-Sankyo: Other: Advisory Board; Portola: Other: Advisory Board; Astra-Zeneca: Other: Advisory Board; Sanofi: Consultancy, Other: Advisory Board; Biotie: Other: Advisory Board; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Consultancy, Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; The Medicines Company: Other: Advisory Board. Carrier:Pfizer: Honoraria; Bayer: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Leo Pharma: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Perioperative Anticoagulant Use for Surgery Evaluation (PAUSE) Study: A Perioperative Management Plan for Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Who Are Receiving a Direct Oral Anticoagulant

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-120770 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. LBA-5-LBA-5 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

James Douketis ◽

Alex C. Spyropoulos ◽

Joanne M Duncan ◽

Marc Carrier ◽

Gregoire Le Gal ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Major Bleeding ◽

Research Funding ◽

Perioperative Management ◽

Elective Surgery ◽

Bleeding Risk ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Arterial Thromboembolism ◽

High Bleeding Risk

Abstract Introduction: The perioperative management of patients who are taking a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) for atrial fibrillation (AF) and require an elective surgery/procedure is uncertain. No studies have addressed the timing of perioperative DOAC interruption and resumption, and if perioperative heparin bridging and coagulation function testing are needed. The Perioperative Anticoagulant Use for Surgery Evaluation (PAUSE) Study hypothesized that a simple, standardized perioperative management strategy, based on DOAC-specific interruption and resumption intervals, that foregoes perioperative heparin bridging and coagulation function testing, is safe for patient care, with associated low rates of major bleeding (1%) and arterial thromboembolism (0.5%). We postulated that this management yields a high proportion of patients (>90%) with a minimal to no DOAC level at surgery/procedure. Methods: PAUSE is a prospective study with 3 parallel DOAC cohorts of patients with AF taking apixaban, dabigatran or rivaroxaban and requiring anticoagulant interruption for an elective surgery/procedure. Patients were managed using a standardized protocol based on DOAC pharmacokinetic properties, procedure-associated bleeding risk (Appendix 1) and creatinine clearance (CrCl). DOACs were interrupted for 1 day before and after surgery for a low bleed risk surgery and 2 days before and after a high bleed surgery; longer interruption was done in patients on dabigatran with a CrCl<50 mL/min (Figure 1). A blood sample was obtained just before the procedure to measure residual DOAC levels (Appendix 2). Heparin bridging and preoperative coagulation testing were not used to manage patients. Patient follow-up occurred weekly for 30 days post-procedure for the primary clinical outcomes of major bleeding and arterial thromboembolism (Appendix 3). The incidence (95% confidence interval [CI]) of clinical outcomes was determined for each DOAC cohort using an intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis (interrupted at least 1 DOAC dose) and per-protocol analysis (adhering to DOAC interruption and resumption protocol). Results: We enrolled 3007 patients from 23 sites in Canada, the U.S. and Europe (Appendix 4). The patient characteristics were (Figure 2): mean age 72.5 years; 66.1% male; 33.5% high bleeding risk surgery/procedure, with 1257 patients in the apixaban cohort, 668 in the dabigatran cohort and 1082 in the rivaroxaban cohort (Table 1). DOAC interruption and resumption intervals are shown in Table 2. The 30-day postoperative rate (95% CI) of major bleeding was 1.35% (0-2.00) in the apixaban cohort, 0.90% (0-1.73) in the dabigatran cohort and 1.85% (0-2.65) in the rivaroxaban cohort; the rate (95% CI) of arterial thromboembolism was 0.16% (0-0.48) in the apixaban cohort, 0.6% (0-1.33) in the dabigatran cohort and 0.37% (0-0.82) in the rivaroxaban cohort (Table 3). There were 2541 (84.5%) patients with preoperative DOAC levels measured: a level <50 ng/ml occurred in 90.5% of patients in the apixaban cohort, in 95.1% of the dabigatran cohort and in 96.8% of the rivaroxaban cohort. Of 1007 patients having a high bleeding risk procedure, 832 (82.6%) had DOAC levels measured: 98.8% had a level <50 ng/mL (Table 4). Rates of major bleeding and arterial thromboembolism in the per protocol analysis were comparable to those of the ITT analysis (Table 5). Conclusions: In patients with AF who were taking a DOAC (apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban) and required anticoagulant interruption for an elective surgery/procedure, using a standardized DOAC-specific perioperative management strategy was safe for patient care, with associated low rates of perioperative MB (<2%) and ATE (<1%). Further, a high proportion of patients (>90% overall; 98.8% at high bleeding risk) had a minimal or no residual DOAC level at the time of the surgery/procedure. PAUSE is the largest study, to date, that addresses how to manage the common problem of perioperative DOAC management. It is likely to have a practice-changing impact and will inform future practice guidelines in perioperative care. Study Funding: CIHR (313156) and the H&S Foundation of Canada (G-14-0006136). Aniara-Hyphen Biomed (assays). Acknowledgments: We thank Drs. Walter Ageno, David Garcia, Lehana Thabane, Wendt Lim, Lori Linkins, William Ristevski, and Demetrios J. Sahlas. Also, Kayla Lucier, Grace Wang, Tara McDougall, and HRLMP and CRLB. Supported by CanVector and REDCap. Disclosures Douketis: Bayer: Other: Advisory Board; Janssen: Consultancy; BMS: Other: Advisory Board; Biotie: Other: Advisory Board; Daiichi-Sankyo: Other: Advisory Board; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Consultancy, Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; The Medicines Company: Other: Advisory Board; Sanofi: Consultancy, Other: Advisory Board; Astra-Zeneca: Other: Advisory Board; Portola: Other: Advisory Board; Pfizer: Other: Advisory Board. Spyropoulos:Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC: Consultancy. Carrier:Bayer: Honoraria; Leo Pharma: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding. Vanassche:Bayer: Consultancy; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy; BMS/Pfizer: Consultancy. Verhamme:Bayer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Medtronic: Honoraria; Portola: Honoraria; Boehringer Ingelheim: Honoraria; Leo Pharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding. Shivakumar:Pfizer: Honoraria; Servier: Honoraria; Bayer: Honoraria; LEO Pharma: Honoraria. Gross:Pfizer: Honoraria; Bayer: Honoraria; LEO Pharma: Honoraria; Servier: Honoraria. Lee:Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Servier: Honoraria; LEO Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria. Le Templier:BMS-pfizer: Honoraria. Wu:Leo Pharma: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; BMS-Pfizer: Honoraria. Coppens:Bayer: Honoraria, Other: Non-financial support, Research Funding; CSL Behring: Honoraria, Other: non-financial support, Research Funding; Uniqure BV: Research Funding. Arnold:Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; UCB: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; UCB: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Caprini:Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Recovery Force: Consultancy; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizor: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen R&D: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Summer:Octapharma: Honoraria. Schulman:Daiichi-Sankyo: Honoraria; Bayer: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Thrombotic and Bleeding Outcomes Following Perioperative Interruption of Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Vitamin K Antagonists in Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation - a Comparative Analysis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-111698 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 1234-1234

Author(s):

Joseph R. Shaw ◽

Tinghua Zhang ◽

Gregoire Le Gal ◽

James Douketis ◽

Marc Carrier

Keyword(s):

Major Bleeding ◽

Research Funding ◽

Vitamin K Antagonists ◽

Oral Anticoagulants ◽

Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽

Bleeding Risk ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Bleeding Events ◽

Chads2 Score ◽

High Bleeding Risk

Abstract Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common disorder that will affect up to 5.6 million patients in the U.S. by 2050. Both direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), typically warfarin, are used for stroke prevention in AF and such patients frequently undergo invasive procedures requiring anticoagulant interruption. Temporary interruption of anticoagulants can be associated with significant morbidity and mortality in the form of thromboembolic and bleeding complications. DOACs have a short half-life and fast onset of action, thereby facilitating their perioperative management as compared to VKAs. Despite important differences in perioperative management and pharmacokinetics between DOACs and VKAs, there is a paucity of data comparing perioperative outcomes in DOAC and VKA-treated patients. Methods: We undertook a single-center, retrospective chart review that compared consecutive DOAC- or warfarin-treated patients with AF who underwent perioperative anticoagulant interruption for invasive procedures between January 2017 and March 2018. Perioperative warfarin interruption was done as per CHEST guidelines (Douketis et al. Chest 141,2 Suppl). Perioperative bridging with low-molecular-weight heparin was only used for patients with CHADS2 scores of 5-6 or in patients with stroke within the past 6 months. Perioperative interruption of DOACs was done as per Thrombosis Canada guidelines, with anticoagulation held for 3 half-lives prior to low bleeding risk procedures and 5 half-lives for high bleeding risk procedures. Primary outcomes included the 30-day post-operative thromboembolic and major bleeding rates. Secondary outcomes included the 30-day clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB) andl mortality rates. Major bleeding and CRNMB were defined according to ISTH definitions. Procedural bleeding risk was defined as per Schulman et al (Circulation 2015; 132(3)). Outcome events were independently adjudicated by two investigators. Outcomes from patients on DOACs and VKAs were compared. Demographic data was analyzed on a per-patient basis, p-values were calculated using independent T-Test, Chi-Square/Fisher's Exact Test where appropriate. Outcome data was analyzed on a per-interruption basis. P-values for unadjusted and adjusted comparisons were calculated using generalized estimating equations (GEE) to account for correlation between multiple procedures on the same patients. Results: 325 DOAC patients and 199 warfarin patients underwent 351 and 221 periprocedural interruptions, respectively. Warfarin patients had a significantly higher mean age, CHADS2 score, and proportion with renal dysfunction (Table 1). There was no statistically significant difference in 30-day post-operative rates of thromboembolism, CRNMB, and overall mortality, but warfarin patients had a significantly higher rate of major bleeding (Table 2). This latter result remained statistically significant following multivariate logistic regression correction for age, CHADS2 score and level of renal dysfunction. All bleeding events occurred post-procedure, with major bleeding events occurring from post-operative day 1 to post-operative day 25. None of the warfarin patients with major bleeding received perioperative bridging; the mean international normalized ratio (INR) at the time of major bleeding was 3.3. Most major bleeding events (7/8) in the VKA arm were surgical, with a single non-surgical major-bleed (spontaneous ICH on post-operative day 15 following urological surgery). Conclusions: The perioperative interruption of warfarin was associated with a higher 30-day rate of major bleeding as compared with DOAC interruption. Re-initiation of warfarin should be done judiciously following high bleeding risk procedures, and close INR monitoring may be warranted. Disclosures Shaw: Portola Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Douketis:Janssen: Consultancy; Pfizer: Other: Advisory Board; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Consultancy, Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Portola: Other: Advisory Board; The Medicines Company: Other: Advisory Board; Daiichi-Sankyo: Other: Advisory Board; Biotie: Other: Advisory Board; Bayer: Other: Advisory Board; Sanofi: Consultancy, Other: Advisory Board; BMS: Other: Advisory Board; Astra-Zeneca: Other: Advisory Board. Carrier:Bayer: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Leo Pharma: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Efficacy and Safety of Primary Thromboprophylaxis for the Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients with Cancer and Central Venous Catheter: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-146904 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2139-2139

Author(s):

Allen Li ◽

Willem Brandt ◽

Cameron Brown ◽

Tzu-Fei Wang ◽

Rick Ikesaka ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Venous Thromboembolism ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Major Bleeding ◽

Research Funding ◽

Venous Catheter ◽

Bleeding Complications ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Central Venous ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Patients With Cancer

Abstract Background Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a leading cause of mortality in patients with cancer and is associated with significant morbidity and healthcare expenditure. The risk of VTE is also increased following the insertion of a central venous catheter (CVC) for chemotherapy deliverance and supportive care. The risks and benefits of primary thromboprophylaxis in patients with cancer and newly inserted CVC are unclear. Objective We sought to assess the rates of VTE and major bleeding complications to determine the safety and efficacy of primary thromboprophylaxis in adult patients with cancer and a CVC. Methods A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and all EBM was conducted. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of adult patients with cancer and a CVC receiving primary thromboprophylaxis or observation/placebo were included. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes were total VTE and major bleeding episodes, respectively. Results A total of 9 RCTs (3155 patients) were included in the analysis. The total rates of VTE were significantly lower in patients receiving primary thromboprophylaxis compared to those not receiving primary prevention (7.6% vs. 13%; Odds Ratio (OR) 0.51, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.82, p < 0.01, I² = 52%) (Figure 1). The rate of major bleeding complication was not increased in patients receiving thromboprophylaxis (0.9% vs. 0.7%; OR 1.12, 95% CI 0.29 to 4.40, p = 0.87, I² = 32%) (Figure 2). Conclusions Primary thromboprophylaxis significantly reduced the risk of VTE without increasing the risk of major bleeding complications in patients with cancer and CVC. Future studies are needed to confirm these findings. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Wang: Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Leo Pharma: Research Funding. Ikesaka: LEO Pharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Wells: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Bayer: Honoraria; BMS/Pfizer: Research Funding; Servier: Honoraria. Carrier: Servier: Honoraria; Boehringer Ingelheim: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Aspen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Bayer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; LEO Pharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi Aventis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Long-term outcomes in high-bleeding risk patients undergoing PCI for acute coronary syndromes: results from a large single-center pci registry

European Heart Journal ◽

10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.2563 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽

Author(s):

J Nicolas ◽

D Cao ◽

B Claessen ◽

S Sartori ◽

R Chandiramani ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Major Bleeding ◽

Acute Coronary Syndromes ◽

Bleeding Risk ◽

Bleeding Complications ◽

Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events ◽

Bleeding Events ◽

Increased Risk ◽

Risk Patients ◽

Coronary Syndromes ◽

High Bleeding Risk

Abstract Introduction Current clinical guidelines recommend prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). However, an extended DAPT duration in high-bleeding risk (HBR) patients amplifies the risk of post procedural complications. Hence, clinicians often face the dilemma of prolonging DAPT duration to prevent recurrent ischaemic events at the expense of increasing the incidence of bleeding in high-risk patients. The actual incidence of ischaemic and bleeding events in this particular population is not well elucidated. Purpose To evaluate one-year ischemic and bleeding outcomes following PCI for ACS in a real-world HBR population as defined by the Academic Research Consortium (ARC) consensus document. Methods We included all patients who presented with ACS to a high-volume single PCI centre from 2012 to 2017 and underwent PCI with 2nd generation drug-eluting stent implantation. Patients were classified as HBR if they met ≥1 major or ≥2 minor criteria according to the recent ARC-HBR consensus. The outcomes of interest were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target lesion revascularization (TLR), and major bleeding events, including both peri-procedural and post-discharge bleeding. All outcomes were assessed at 1-year follow-up. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for time-to-event analyses. Results Out of 6,097 ACS patients included in this analysis, 2,717 (44.6%) fulfilled the ARC-HBR definition. Compared to non-HBR group, HBR patients were more frequently female, older, more likely to have cardiovascular risk factors (e.g., diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia) and complex coronary artery disease (e.g., multi-vessel disease, bifurcation lesions, and calcification). The 1-year incidence of MACE was significantly higher in HBR patients (16.3% vs. 8.1%, HR 2.16, 95% CI [1.81–2.59], p<0.001) (Figure 1A). This finding was driven by higher rates of all-cause death and MI (Figure 1B). The 1-year incidence of major bleeding was also significantly higher in HBR patients compared to non-HBR (11.1% vs. 3.1%, HR: 3.92, 95% CI 3.10–4.95; p<0.001). Conclusions HBR patients undergoing PCI for ACS are not only subject to bleeding complications but are also at an increased risk for ischemic events and all-cause mortality. Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Download Full-text

Factor XIII Deficiency in Patients with Acute Leukemia: One out of Three Is Presenting with Deficiency

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.1528.1528 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 1528-1528 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Elisabetta Vagge ◽

Christian Dornes ◽

Maisun Abu Samra ◽

Wolfgang Blau ◽

Mathias J Rummel ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Leukemia ◽

Intracranial Hemorrhage ◽

Factor Xiii ◽

Bleeding Risk ◽

Bleeding Complications ◽

Invasive Procedures ◽

Risk Of Bleeding ◽

Median Level ◽

High Bleeding Risk ◽

Fxiii Deficiency

Abstract Introduction: Factor XIII (FXIII) is a coagulation factor, playing an important role in the coagulation process by keeping the hemostatic clot and allowing tissue repair. The incidence of FXIII deficiency in acute leukemia is not well characterized. FXIII deficiency is known to have a high bleeding risk and cannot be detected by lab evaluation of aPTT and/or INR levels. In combination with thrombocytopenia in patients (pts) presenting with acute leukemia, FXIII deficiency increases bleeding risk (for example in invasive procedures or for intracranial hemorrhage). In 2013 a study was conducted in 9 pediatric pts (6 acute leukemias, 1 burkitt, and 2 solid tumors) in whom FXIII deficiency was found. These pts had bleeding complications that were resolved by FXIII concentrate substitution (Wiegering. V. et al. Haematologica, June, 10, 2013).Patients affected from AML and ALL could easily be screened at diagnosis regarding FXIII level. In the setting of newly diagnosed acute leukemia pts in whom thrombocytopenia is frequently occurring, a preemptive substitution of FXIII could be considered in order to reduce the risk of bleeding complications. Methods: In this retrospective analysis (Jan. 2009 to June 2014) we identified a total of 103 ptspresentingwithnewly diagnosed acute leukemia in whom we assessed FXIII level. In 95 pts FXIII level was available at initial diagnosis of acute leukemia and during treatment. Substitution of FXIII concentrate have been used in case of factor’s deficiency below 70% (normal range 70%-130%). Results: Patients presented withAML (64 primary AML and 20 secondary AML), or ALL (10), or 1 AUL. Median age was 67 years (range: 25-95). Thirty-four pts (35.8%) were younger than 60 years, 61 pts (64.2 %) were older than 60 years. FXIII deficiency was found in 35/95 pts (36.8%) with a median level of 49% (range: 21%-68%). Of those 35 pts with FXIII deficiency 33 had AML (1 AML M0, 9 AML M1, 2 AML M1/2, 5 AML M2, 6 AML M4, 5 AML M5). All pts (5/95) with AML M3 showed a deficiency with a median level of 28%. A level below 70% could be found in 7 out of 13 FLT3-ITD positive pts (53.8%) and in 7 out of 24 NPM1 positive pts (29.2 %). Median FXIII level was 34% for FLT3-ITD positive pts, respectively 30% for NPM1. FXIII substitution in deficient pts was well tolerated and effective. No patient showed intracranial hemorrhage. In addition, invasive procedures like bone marrow biopsy and central line insertion were possible without clinically relevant bleeding complications. In responding pts achieving remission following chemotherapy, a trend towards higher concentration of factor XIII during treatment was observed. Conclusions: Patients affected by AML or ALL are presenting usually with thrombocytopenia and have a high bleeding risk. In case of FXIII deficiency, risk of bleeding is increased potentially leading to a higher leukemia-related morbidity and mortality. Detection of FXIII deficiency is an established method and routinely available. Substitution of FXIII decreases the risk of bleeding and can reduce leukemia associated morbidity and mortality. In our study FXIII deficiency occurred in more than a third of our pts, including all AML M3 patients. We found a trend for more FXIII deficiency in FLT3-ITD high risk group patients. We suggest screening at diagnosis and during treatment of all acute leukemia pts and FXIII substitution in case of deficiency. To evaluate further the role of FXIII assessment and substitution in case of FXIII deficiency in acute leukemia, a prospective trial should be considered. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Unfractionated Heparin Use in Children: Clinical Outcomes in a Pediatric Cohort Managed Using an Anti-Factor Xa Based Nomogram

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v130.suppl_1.701.701 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 130 (Suppl_1) ◽

pp. 701-701

Author(s):

Surbhi Saini ◽

Katherine L Harsh ◽

Joseph R Stanek ◽

Sarah O'Brien ◽

Amy L. Dunn ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Major Bleeding ◽

Research Funding ◽

Bleeding Risk ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Minor Bleeding ◽

Direct Oral Anticoagulant ◽

Bleeding Events ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Educational Grant

Abstract Background: Given its short half-life and immediate, complete reversibility with protamine sulfate, unfractionated heparin (UFH) remains the anticoagulant of choice for critically-ill children. The American College of Chest Physicians recommends that a therapeutic activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) range in children on treatment doses of UFH should reflect an anti-FXa level of 0.35-0.7 IU/mL. A previous study from our institution showed moderate correlation between APTT and anti-FXa, prompting an institution-wide change to an anti-FXa based nomogram. Per the new nomogram, APTT and anti-FXa levels were simultaneously collected at pre-specified time points, though dose titrations were made on anti-FXa levels alone. In this study, we present our 20-month experience using this nomogram. Objectives: To assess the utility of anti-FXa based UFH dosing guidelines in children over a 20-month period (September 2015-May 2017). Methods: Permission for this study was obtained from the Institutional Review Board. Data was abstracted for all pediatric patients (age<21 yrs.) receiving therapeutic dosing of UFH (≥18 u/kg/hr) at Nationwide Children's Hospital (NCH) over the study period. Patients receiving UFH for <24 hrs, patients with mechanical circuits (ECMO and ventricular assist devices), and patients receiving concomitant anti-platelet therapy were excluded. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and comparisons were made using non-parametric methods. Correlations were assessed using the Bland-Altman method for repeated measures. Results: Over a 20-month period, 176 patients received UFH therapy at NCH. Of these, 95 patients met our pre-specified inclusion criteria. These 95 patients had 1102 simultaneous APTT and anti-FXa measurements performed. Baseline demographic information is described in Table 1. Mean duration of UFH therapy was 5.2 days (range: 1-45 days). Median UFH dose required to reach therapeutic anti-FXa goal was 22 units/kg/hr (range: 18-55 units/kg/hr), and was significantly higher in infants (<1yr of age) compared to older children (33.9 u/kg and 20 u/kg respectively; p<0.0001). Median time to achieve therapeutic anti-Xa was 10 hours (range: 2-96 hours), and was significantly shorter in patients who received a bolus (n=44) compared to those who did not (5 hrs and 12 hrs respectively; p=0.03). Five patients never achieved therapeutic anti-FXa levels. In patients with thrombo-embolism (n=75), 65 had end-of-therapy imaging (complete response: 36; partial or no response: 29). Time to achieve therapeutic anti-FXa was not predictive of radiological response (p=0.27). Moderate linear correlation between the APTT and anti-FXa (r = 0.74; 95% CI = 0.71-0.77) (Figure 1) was noted for the entire cohort. Eleven (10.6%) major and non-major bleeding events and 10 (10.5%) minor bleeding events were noted. When comparing coagulation parameters of patients with major and non-major bleeding to those with no-bleeding and minor bleeding age, indication for anticoagulation, peak anti-FXa, peak APTT, lowest platelet count and fibrinogen were not predictive of bleeding. Critically high APTT (>250 sec) was noted on 43 occasions in 21 unique patients and not associated with an increased risk of major and non-major bleeds (p=0.07). Conclusions: UFH monitoring is challenging in children. Time to achieve therapeutic anticoagulation and bleeding risk in our cohort is consistent with previous publications. Contrary to previous publications, extreme elevation of APTT was not associated with increased bleeding risk. Disclosures O'Brien: Pfizer: Consultancy, Other: study of direct oral anticoagulant in treatment of pediatric VTE; Glaxo Smith Kline: Other: DSMB for Arixtra Study in Pediatric VTE; CSL Behring: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: advisory board - von Willebrand Disease diagnosis & management; Bristol Myers Squibb: Other: study of direct oral anticoagulant in prevention of pediatric VTE, Research Funding; Shire: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: advisory board - VWD diagnosis and management. Dunn: Alnylam: Other: Unrestricted educational grant; Bayer: Consultancy, Other: Unrestricted educational grant; Kedrion: Other: Unrestricted educational grant; NovoNordisk: Other: Unrestricted educational grant; Octapharma: Other: Unrestricted educational grant; Shire: Consultancy, Other: Unrestricted educational grant, Research Funding; Biogen: Other: Unrestricted educational grant, Research Funding; CSL Behring: Consultancy, Other: Unrestricted educational grant; World Federation of Hemophilia USA: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kumar: Bayer: Consultancy; CSL Behring: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Acute coronary syndrome patients with two minor high-bleeding risk criteria have the same bleeding rate that patients with one major criteria

European Heart Journal ◽

10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.1311 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽

Author(s):

A Cordero ◽

J.M Garcia-Acuna ◽

M Rodriguez-Manero ◽

B Cid ◽

B Alvarez Alvarez ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Major Bleeding ◽

Academic Research ◽

Bleeding Risk ◽

Bleeding Events ◽

Post Discharge ◽

Bleeding Rate ◽

Coronary Syndrome ◽

All Cause Mortality ◽

High Bleeding Risk ◽

Minor Criteria

Abstract Background In 2019 the Academic Research Consortium of high-bleeding risk (ARC-HBR) proposed a new and binary definition of high-bleeding risk (HBR) patients based on the presence of 1 major or 2 minor criteria. Methods Prospective study of all consecutive patients admitted for ACS in two different centers. We analyzed bleeding incidence in patients with 1 major criteria (1MC) vs. 2 minor criteria (2mC) using the 2019 ARC-HBR consensus. Bleeding events were collected according those fitting definitions 3 or 5 of the BARC consortium. Results We included 8,724 patients included and 40.9% we classified as HBR; 20.9% for 1MC and 20.0% for 2mC. In-hospital mayor bleeding rate was 8.6%; no-HBR patients had 0.3%, 2mC 15.1% and 1MC 29.7% (p<0.001 for the comparison). In contrast, the statistically highest in-hospital mortality was observed in patients with 2mC (11.4%), followed by patients with 1MC (8.0%) and no-HBR patients (2.0%). During follow-up (median time 57.8 months) all-cause mortality rate was 21.0% and cardiovascular dead 14.2%. The incidence of post-discharge major bleeding was 10.5%. No-HBR patients had the lowest bleeding rate (7.4%) and no difference was observed in patients with 1MC (14.6%) or 2mC (15.8%) (figure). The multivariate analysis, adjusted by age, gender, medical treatment, atrial fibrillation and revascularization and considering all-cause mortality as competing risk, showed independent association of 1MC (sHR: 1.46, 95% 1.22–1.75) and 2mC (sHR: 1.31, 95% CI 1.05–1.63) with post-discharge major bleeding. Conclusions HBR patients according to the 2019 ARC-HBR containing 2mC or 1MC are at similar and higher risk of in-hospital or post-discharge bleeding events Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Download Full-text

Rivaroxaban for Stroke Prevention in Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation and Active Cancer

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.2621.2621 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 2621-2621 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Eva Simona Laube ◽

Anthony Yu ◽

Dipti Gupta ◽

Yimei Miao ◽

Patrick Samedy ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Atrial Fibrillation ◽

General Population ◽

Competing Risks ◽

Major Bleeding ◽

Cumulative Incidence ◽

Research Funding ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

Systemic Embolism ◽

Safety And Efficacy ◽

Active Cancer

Abstract BACKGROUND: The link between aging, cancer and atrial fibrillation is well known and the appropriate anticoagulation management of non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) in patients with active cancer is of growing clinical concern. Rivaroxaban has been broadly used for the primary prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in the general population of patients with NVAF. However, individuals with a serious concomitant illness associated with a life expectancy of less than 2 years were excluded from pivotal trials including the ROCKET-AF study, limiting the generalizability of results to patients with active cancer. There is little published evidence on the safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban for NVAF in this specific subgroup. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban in patients with active cancer and NVAF. METHODS: The use of rivaroxaban in cancer patients at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) was monitored in the setting of a Quality Assessment Initiative. Patients with active cancer and NVAF treated with rivaroxaban from 1/1/2014 through 3/31/2016 are included in this analysis. Endpoints of interest were defined a priori and include stroke, systemic embolism, major bleeding and clinically-relevant non-major bleeding leading to discontinuation of rivaroxaban for at least 7 days (CRNMB). Clinical events were assessed through text searches of medical records. The analysis was performed respecting different times on previous anticoagulation, considering the first 90 days as the acute phase of treatment and contrasting it with the subsequent chronic phase. RESULTS: A total of 163 evaluable patients were included in the analysis, with a median age of 72.0 years (interquartile range=67.0-77.5 years) and 56% of these individuals being men. The majority had a solid tumor (85%), with stage IV disease reported in 50% of cases. The mean CHA2DS2-Vasc score was 3.2 (standard deviation=1.5) and 64% of patients were already in the chronic phase of anticoagulation. Results for the acute, chronic and combined phases of anticoagulation are presented in the Table and plotted in the Figure. The estimated cumulative incidence of ischemic stroke, major bleeding, and CRNMB at 1 year were 1.4% (95% CI=0-3.4%), 1.2% (95% CI=0-2.9%) and 14.0% (95% CI=4.2-22.7%) respectively, after adjusting for competing risks. Interestingly, the cumulative incidence of major bleeding in our cohort is lower than the value reported for the ORBIT-AF registry of cancer patients on dabigatran or a vitamin K antagonist for NVAF, in which the estimated rate of this complication was 5.1/100 patient-years. Lastly, the 1-year cumulative incidence of mortality was 22.6% (95% CI=12.2-31.7%). This high risk of death was present throughout the observation period and reflects the cancer population. One patient died after developing an acute ischemic cerebrovascular insult and a myocardial infarction. There were no deaths related to bleeding and no recorded systemic embolism episodes. CONCLUSIONS: The safety and efficacy profile of rivaroxaban treatment for NVAF in patients with active cancer seems comparable to what was observed for the general population in the ROCKET-AF study, but ideally a prospective study would be required to confirm these findings. Table Cumulative Incidence of Competing risks for Patients in the Acute, Chronic and Combined Phases of Anticoagulation* *Cumulative incidence estimates for the chronic phase are conditional to reaching day 90 of anticoagulation without sustaining an event. The chronic phase was defined as lasting 275 days and the combined period encompasses 365 days. CRNMB: Clinically-relevant non-major bleeding leading to discontinuation of rivaroxaban for at least 7 days. *Clinically-relevant non-major bleeding leading to discontinuation of rivaroxabanfor at least7 days. Table. Cumulative Incidence of Competing risks for Patients in the Acute, Chronic and Combined Phases of Anticoagulation*. / *Cumulative incidence estimates for the chronic phase are conditional to reaching day 90 of anticoagulation without sustaining an event. The chronic phase was defined as lasting 275 days and the combined period encompasses 365 days. / CRNMB: Clinically-relevant non-major bleeding leading to discontinuation of rivaroxaban for at least 7 days. / *Clinically-relevant non-major bleeding leading to discontinuation of rivaroxabanfor at least7 days. Figure Figure. Disclosures Yu: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Soff:Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC: Consultancy, Research Funding. Mantha:Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Bleeding Complications in Patients with Cancer and COVID 19- Analysis from the COVID 19and Cancer Consortium (CCC19) Registry

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-154314 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 4997-4997

Author(s):

Surbhi Shah ◽

Shuchi Gulati ◽

Ang Li ◽

Julie Fu ◽

Vaibhav Kumar ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Mechanical Ventilation ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Stock Options ◽

Research Funding ◽

Tumor Board ◽

Bleeding Complications ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Icu Admission ◽

Patients With Cancer ◽

Privately Held

Abstract Background : Patients (pts) with COVID-19 are reported to have increased risk of venous thromboembolism yet bleeding has been an under recognized complication. Rates of bleeding remain unexamined in all patients especially in pts with cancer and COVID-19. Aim: To estimate the incidence of bleeding complication in patients with cancer and COVID 19 Methods: The CCC19 international registry (NCT04354701) aims to investigate complications of COVID-19 in pts with cancer. Our aim was to investigate the frequency of bleeding in hospitalized adult pts with cancer andCOVID-19, enrolled between March 16, 2020 and Feb 8, 2021. The incidence of bleeding complications was captured as defined by CCC19 and included both major and non major bleeding . Associated baseline clinic-pathologic prognostic factors and outcomes such as need for mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit (ICU) admission and mortality rates were assessed Results :3849 pts met analysis inclusion criteria. Bleeding was reported in 276 (7%) pts with median age of 70years; incidence was 6.6 % in females and 7.6 % in males, 6.5% in non-Hispanic white pts, 8.2 % in non-Hispanic Black pts, and 7.8 % in Hispanic pts. 74% had solid cancer and 29% had hematologic malignancies, 33% had received anti-cancer therapy in preceding 30 days, and 8% had surgery within 4weeks. In pts taking antiplatelet or anticoagulant medications at baseline, 7.2% developed bleeding. Need for mechanical ventilation, ICU admission, 30-day mortality, and total mortality were significantly higher in those with bleeding complications compared to those without, p<0.05 Conclusion : We describe the incidence of bleeding in a large cohort of pts with cancer and COVID-19. Bleeding events were observed in those with adverse outcomes including mechanical ventilation, ICU admission, and high mortality; the overall mortality of 43% in patients with bleeding complications is especially notable. This important complication may reflect underlying COVID-19 pathophysiology as well as iatrogenic causes. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Kumar: Diagnostica Stago: Honoraria. Zon: AMAGMA AND RLZ: Consultancy, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company. Byeff: Pfizer, BMS, Takeda,Teva, Merck, United health: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Nagaraj: Novartis: Research Funding. Hwang: astrazaneca,Merck,bayer, Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding. McKay: Myovant: Consultancy; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Exelixis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Calithera: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Tempus: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Tempus: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Dendreon: Consultancy; Caris: Other: Serves as a molecular tumor board ; Vividion: Consultancy; Sorrento Therapeutics: Consultancy; Bayer: Research Funding. Warner: Westat, Hemonc.org: Consultancy, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Connors: Pfizer: Honoraria; CSL Behring: Research Funding; Alnylam: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; takeda: Honoraria; Abbott: Consultancy. Rosovsky: Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Inari: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Dova: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Bleeding risk and complications associated with percutaneous ultrasound-guided liver biopsy in cats

Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery ◽

10.1177/1098612x18788883 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 21 (6) ◽

pp. 529-536 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Michelle Pavlick ◽

Cynthia RL Webster ◽

Dominique G Penninck

Keyword(s):

Liver Biopsy ◽

Vitamin K ◽

Major Bleeding ◽

Bleeding Risk ◽

Bleeding Complications ◽

P Value ◽

Safe Procedure ◽

Ultrasound Guided ◽

Coagulation Parameters ◽

Ultrasound Findings

Objectives Liver biopsy is necessary for a diagnosis of liver disease; however, post-biopsy bleeding is a concern. The aim of this study was to describe the extent of bleeding and the occurrence of complications after percutaneous ultrasound-guided liver biopsy (PUGLB) in cats. Methods The medical records of 30 cats that had a PUGLB were retrospectively reviewed. Using human guidelines, bleeding was classified as minor or major when the absolute change in packed cell volume (ΔPCV) was <0 and >−6% or ≤-6%, respectively. Complications were defined as physiologic compromise necessitating an intervention, or death. The relationship between ΔPCV and the occurrence of complications and the signalment, initial PCV, coagulation parameters, serum liver enzymes and bilirubin, number of biopsies, histological diagnosis, ultrasound findings, radiologist experience, concurrent procedures and vitamin K administration were assessed using Fisher’s exact test, ANOVA and Pearson’s correlation coefficient, with a P value <0.05 considered significant. Results All cats had a decrease in PCV after biopsy. The mean ΔPCV was −6.9% ± 4.1%. Minor and major bleeding occurred in 13/30 (43.3%) and 17/30 (56.7%) cats, respectively, and non-lethal bleeding complications occurred in 5/30 (16.7%). Cats with complications had a lower pre-biopsy PCV ( P <0.003). Major bleeding was more likely with a diagnosis of hepatic lipidosis ( P = 0.03). There was no correlation between ΔPCV or complications and signalment, coagulation parameters, serum parameters, number of biopsies, ultrasound findings, radiologist experience, concurrent procedures and vitamin K administration. Conclusions and relevance PUGLB is a relatively safe procedure in cats, although many cats have a subclinical decrease in PCV. As conventional coagulation tests did not predict complications or the magnitude of ΔPCV, there is a need for more sensitive indicators of bleeding risk in cats undergoing PUGLB.

Download Full-text