Bleeding Complications in Patients with Cancer and COVID 19- Analysis from the COVID 19and Cancer Consortium (CCC19) Registry

Abstract Background : Patients (pts) with COVID-19 are reported to have increased risk of venous thromboembolism yet bleeding has been an under recognized complication. Rates of bleeding remain unexamined in all patients especially in pts with cancer and COVID-19. Aim: To estimate the incidence of bleeding complication in patients with cancer and COVID 19 Methods: The CCC19 international registry (NCT04354701) aims to investigate complications of COVID-19 in pts with cancer. Our aim was to investigate the frequency of bleeding in hospitalized adult pts with cancer andCOVID-19, enrolled between March 16, 2020 and Feb 8, 2021. The incidence of bleeding complications was captured as defined by CCC19 and included both major and non major bleeding . Associated baseline clinic-pathologic prognostic factors and outcomes such as need for mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit (ICU) admission and mortality rates were assessed Results :3849 pts met analysis inclusion criteria. Bleeding was reported in 276 (7%) pts with median age of 70years; incidence was 6.6 % in females and 7.6 % in males, 6.5% in non-Hispanic white pts, 8.2 % in non-Hispanic Black pts, and 7.8 % in Hispanic pts. 74% had solid cancer and 29% had hematologic malignancies, 33% had received anti-cancer therapy in preceding 30 days, and 8% had surgery within 4weeks. In pts taking antiplatelet or anticoagulant medications at baseline, 7.2% developed bleeding. Need for mechanical ventilation, ICU admission, 30-day mortality, and total mortality were significantly higher in those with bleeding complications compared to those without, p<0.05 Conclusion : We describe the incidence of bleeding in a large cohort of pts with cancer and COVID-19. Bleeding events were observed in those with adverse outcomes including mechanical ventilation, ICU admission, and high mortality; the overall mortality of 43% in patients with bleeding complications is especially notable. This important complication may reflect underlying COVID-19 pathophysiology as well as iatrogenic causes. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Kumar: Diagnostica Stago: Honoraria. Zon: AMAGMA AND RLZ: Consultancy, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company. Byeff: Pfizer, BMS, Takeda,Teva, Merck, United health: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Nagaraj: Novartis: Research Funding. Hwang: astrazaneca,Merck,bayer, Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding. McKay: Myovant: Consultancy; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Exelixis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Calithera: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Tempus: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Tempus: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Dendreon: Consultancy; Caris: Other: Serves as a molecular tumor board ; Vividion: Consultancy; Sorrento Therapeutics: Consultancy; Bayer: Research Funding. Warner: Westat, Hemonc.org: Consultancy, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Connors: Pfizer: Honoraria; CSL Behring: Research Funding; Alnylam: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; takeda: Honoraria; Abbott: Consultancy. Rosovsky: Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Inari: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Dova: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Efficacy and Safety of Primary Thromboprophylaxis for the Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients with Cancer and Central Venous Catheter: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-146904 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2139-2139

Author(s):

Allen Li ◽

Willem Brandt ◽

Cameron Brown ◽

Tzu-Fei Wang ◽

Rick Ikesaka ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Venous Thromboembolism ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Major Bleeding ◽

Research Funding ◽

Venous Catheter ◽

Bleeding Complications ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Central Venous ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Patients With Cancer

Abstract Background Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a leading cause of mortality in patients with cancer and is associated with significant morbidity and healthcare expenditure. The risk of VTE is also increased following the insertion of a central venous catheter (CVC) for chemotherapy deliverance and supportive care. The risks and benefits of primary thromboprophylaxis in patients with cancer and newly inserted CVC are unclear. Objective We sought to assess the rates of VTE and major bleeding complications to determine the safety and efficacy of primary thromboprophylaxis in adult patients with cancer and a CVC. Methods A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and all EBM was conducted. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of adult patients with cancer and a CVC receiving primary thromboprophylaxis or observation/placebo were included. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes were total VTE and major bleeding episodes, respectively. Results A total of 9 RCTs (3155 patients) were included in the analysis. The total rates of VTE were significantly lower in patients receiving primary thromboprophylaxis compared to those not receiving primary prevention (7.6% vs. 13%; Odds Ratio (OR) 0.51, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.82, p < 0.01, I² = 52%) (Figure 1). The rate of major bleeding complication was not increased in patients receiving thromboprophylaxis (0.9% vs. 0.7%; OR 1.12, 95% CI 0.29 to 4.40, p = 0.87, I² = 32%) (Figure 2). Conclusions Primary thromboprophylaxis significantly reduced the risk of VTE without increasing the risk of major bleeding complications in patients with cancer and CVC. Future studies are needed to confirm these findings. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Wang: Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Leo Pharma: Research Funding. Ikesaka: LEO Pharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Wells: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Bayer: Honoraria; BMS/Pfizer: Research Funding; Servier: Honoraria. Carrier: Servier: Honoraria; Boehringer Ingelheim: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Aspen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Bayer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; LEO Pharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi Aventis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

The Impact of Degree of Anticoagulation on Thrombotic and Other Complications in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-148775 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 1051-1051

Author(s):

Rena Zheng ◽

Alexandra Solomon ◽

Madeline DiLorenzo ◽

Iniya Rajendran ◽

Joseph Park ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

High Dose ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Icu Admission ◽

Group A ◽

Group B ◽

The Impact ◽

D Dimer ◽

Privately Held

Abstract Introduction: In hospitalized patients infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the frequency of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is increased. Retrospective studies suggested that an elevated D-dimer level is associated with increased mortality and predictive of thrombosis in these patients. In the spring of 2020, our institution developed a risk protocol for stratification of hospitalized COVID-19 patients into high, intermediate, or low risk groups, based upon history of thrombosis and D-dimer level. These patients were treated with full-dose anticoagulation, high- or standard-dose prophylaxis, respectively. The goal of this project was to determine the impact of this protocol on VTE frequency, need for intensive care unit (ICU) admission, organ failure and in-hospital mortality while assessing the frequency of hemorrhagic complications when compared to standard prophylactic anticoagulation. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of adults hospitalized between March 1 - June 1, 2020 who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by nasopharyngeal polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Patients were excluded if they were initially admitted to the ICU. VTE was defined as either a deep vein thrombosis (DVT) on Duplex ultrasound and/or pulmonary embolism (PE) on computed tomography (CT) angiogram. We collected demographic data, medical histories, laboratory and radiologic data on all subjects. Data were analyzed using the Chi Square test and Fisher's Exact Test to establish significant association with clinical outcomes between 3 anticoagulation regimens. Statistical significance was assessed at the p<0.05 level. Results: Data were analyzed from 910 patients; 496 (54.6%) were male and the mean age was 57.8 ± 16.9 years. 419 (46%) subjects were Black, 151 (16.6%) Caucasian, 133 (14.6%) Latinx. Diabetes mellitus (35.3%) and hypertension (59.8%) were common in our cohort as were tobacco (12.6%) and alcohol (20.4%) use. Only 69 (7.6%) were treated with chronic anticoagulation and 216 (23.7%) were on antiplatelet agents. 123 (13.5%) required an ICU transfer and the overall mortality was 5.3%. Most patients, 809 (88.9%), received standard prophylactic anti-coagulation initially (Group A); 32 (3.5%) received high dose prophylaxis (Group B) and 69 (7.6%) received therapeutic dose anticoagulation (Group C). In the entire cohort, 46 (5.1%) developed VTE; 29 (3.6%) in Group A, 2 (6.3%) in Group B, and 15 (22%) in Group C (p<0.0001). ICU admission was required for 102 (12.6%) in Group A, 7 (21.9%) in Group B, and 14 (20.3%) in Group C (p=0.075). 73 ICU patients (8%) required vasopressors, including 57 (7%) in Group A, 6 (18.8%) in Group B and 10 (14.5%) in Group C (p=0.175). 81 ICU patients (8.9%) required mechanical ventilation, including 66 (8.2%) in Group A, 6 (18.8%) in Group B, and 9 (13%) in Group C (p=0.513). One patient in Group B developed an intracerebral hemorrhage. Gastrointestinal hemorrhage occurred in 11 (1.2%) of the cohort; similar rates were observed across treatment arms. The overall in-hospital mortality was 5.3% in this cohort (4.7% in Group A, 12.5% in Group B, and 8.6% in Group C, p=0.064). Conclusion: The rate of VTE in COVID-19 patients receiving any form of anti-coagulation was low. There was an increased rate of VTE, but not rates of ICU admission, mortality, mechanical ventilation nor vasopressor use in those receiving either high dose prophylaxis or therapeutic anticoagulation, suggesting an increased propensity for thrombosis either related to prior thrombotic events or reflected by increased D-dimer levels. These findings need to be confirmed in prospective studies. Disclosures DiLorenzo: Abbott: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company; Merck & Co: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company; Glaxo Smith Kline: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company. Sloan: Pharmacosmos: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astra Zeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Honoraria; Stemline: Honoraria. Weinberg: Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Other: Serve on data safety monitoring boards; Merck & Co: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company. Klings: CSL Behring: Other: Consultant; Omeros: Other: Consultant; Bluebird Bio: Other: Consultant; Bayer: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; FORM therapeutics: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Outcomes for Myelofibrosis Patients Following Myeloablative Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation Using the Orca-T Graft from HLA-Matched Related and Unrelated Donors

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-150521 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 1819-1819

Author(s):

Arpita Gandhi ◽

Anna Moroz ◽

Lori Muffly ◽

Parveen Shiraz ◽

Levanto Schachter ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Stock Options ◽

Research Funding ◽

Immune Reconstitution ◽

Acute Gvhd ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Donor Chimerism ◽

Marrow Fibrosis ◽

Privately Held

Abstract Background: Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo SCT) is the only potentially curative therapy for patients with intermediate-2 and high-risk myelofibrosis (MF). Allo SCT for MF has historically been challenging as many patients are transplanted with active or advanced disease and immune reconstitution in MF patients is often hindered by inflammation and bone marrow fibrosis. When compared to non-SCT therapies, MF patients who receive allo SCT achieve long-term survival benefits. However, it comes with an upfront cost of an increased risk of non-relapse mortality in the first year after allo SCT (Gowin K et al, Blood Av 2020). Therefore, there is an unmet need to improve on the early outcomes of transplantation for MF. Methods: We reviewed MF patients who underwent myeloablative allo SCT with Orca-T derived from HLA matched donors on NCT01660607 and NCT04013685. Orca-T is an investigational cellular product comprising stem and immune cells that leverages highly purified donor regulatory T cells to control alloreactive immune responses. Single agent GVHD prophylaxis was administered as tacrolimus or sirolimus. Results: We present outcomes for 7 MF patients with DIPSS risk of int-1 (n=1), int-2 or higher risk MF (n=6) treated with the Orca-T graft and compared this to 6 MF patients who underwent standard of care (SOC) allo SCT at Stanford, between 2017 - 2021 (Table 1). All patients were high or very high-risk based on MIPSS70 plus score v, 2.0. All patients had 10/10 HLA-matched donors, except 1 of 7 Orca-T patients who had 9/10 HLA-matched donor. All but 1 patient in both, Orca-T and SOC, recipients had prior Jakafi exposure. All Orca-T recipients had splenomegaly with spleen size of 16.3 - 23 cm. Engraftment occurred at median of D+13 (range 10-29) and 6 of 7 patients had 100% CD3 donor chimerism at D+100. 1 patient was 90% CD3 donor chimerism at D+100 but achieved 100% CD3 donor chimerism at D+180. All patients had significant marrow fibrosis, MF grade 2 or 3, before allo SCT. Regression of marrow fibrosis to MF grade 0 or 1 was noted by D+ 100 in 7 of 7 Orca-T recipients but only in 1 of 6 SOC patients. Orca-T recipients did not have grade 2-4 acute GVHD and 1 of 7 recipients had extensive chronic GVHD. Tacrolimus was tapered off in 3 of 7 patients at D+180. SOC recipients had 2 of 6 recipients with grade 2-4 acute GVHD, 3 of 6 recipients with extensive chronic GVHD and only 1 recipient was taken off tacrolimus at D+180. There were no deaths in Orca-T recipients and 2 deaths in SOC recipients before D+180, cause of death was acute GVHD and relapse. Finally, when compared to standard allo SCT, Orca-T recipients may have a reduced frequency and severity of infections without significant consequences while the SOC patients had severe and often multiple infections. Conclusion: Our data indicates that Orca-T graft was well tolerated and potentially efficacious in MF patients undergoing allo SCT. We observed early regression of marrow fibrosis at D+100 in all Orca-T recipients. This limited data suggests that Orca-T may afford an early resolution of an inflammatory microenvironment that allows for robust immune reconstitution and potentially lower incidence of serious infections. Orca-T is under continued investigation to reduce early non-relapse mortality for MF. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Gandhi: CareDx Inc: Honoraria; Gamida Cell: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Muffly: Pfizer, Amgen, Jazz, Medexus, Pfizer: Consultancy; Astellas, Jasper, Adaptive, Baxalta: Research Funding; Adaptive: Honoraria, Other: fees for non-CME/CE services: , Research Funding. Shiraz: Kite Pharma-Gilead: Research Funding. Fernhoff: Orca Bio: Current Employment. McClellan: Orca Bio: Current Employment, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Gotlib: Allakos: Consultancy; Cogent Biosciences: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Chair for the Eligibility and Central Response Review Committee, Research Funding; PharmaEssentia: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Kartos: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Deciphera: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Blueprint Medicines: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Meyer: Triursus Therapeutics: Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company; GigaImmune: Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company; Orca Biosystems: Research Funding; Indee, Jura: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Molecular Biomarker Testing and Targeted Therapy Patterns in Patients with Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML) in Community Health Systems in the United States: A Real-World Data Analysis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-148634 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 4443-4443

Author(s):

Francesca Coutinho ◽

Zartash Gul ◽

Anna B. Berry ◽

Michael A. Thompson ◽

Christopher Allen Willner ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Targeted Therapy ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Real World ◽

Stock Options ◽

Research Funding ◽

Molecular Testing ◽

Molecular Biomarker ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Biomarker Testing ◽

Privately Held

Abstract Background and Objective: Molecular testing and treatment patterns for patients (pts) diagnosed with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) have evolved over recent years. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies allow for detection of somatic gene alterations that have prognostic and/or predictive/therapeutic significance. To describe the real-world testing patterns and clinical management of patients with AML, NGS testing, other molecular testing, mutations detected, and targeted treatment administration were analyzed in 2 large community health systems in the US. Methods: Pts >18 years, diagnosed with AML from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2020, were identified in the Syapse Learning Health Network, a real-world database with clinical and genomic data from integrated community delivery networks. Study end date was March 31, 2021, allowing for a minimum follow up of 3 months from diagnosis. Pts with less than 2 clinical encounters were excluded. Electronic health records were reviewed retrospectively to analyze molecular biomarker testing patterns, actionable and prognostic biomarkers detected as defined by NCCN guidelines version 3, 2021, and targeted treatments administered. This study received Institutional Review Board (IRB) exemption. Results: The study included 685 pts with median age at AML diagnosis of 70 and median follow up of 5.4 months. 55% were male, 73% were non-Hispanic white, 10% were non-Hispanic black, 31% had ECOG performance status (PS) 0 or 1 and 16% had ECOG PS > 2 at diagnosis, and 69% had de novo AML. Pts with secondary AML consisted of pts evolving from prior myelodysplasia, myeloproliferative disorder, or aplastic anemia, or therapy related AML. 4% had favorable cytogenetic prognosis, 33% intermediate, and 30% adverse, with the remaining 33% unknown. 541 (79%) pts received either NGS or other molecular biomarker tests. 375 (55%) pts received NGS with or without other molecular biomarker tests and 166 (24%) pts received other molecular biomarker tests only [e.g. Sanger Sequencing, RT-PCR (reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction), PCR]. Pts who did not receive molecular biomarker testing (n=144) were older with median age of 78 and median follow-up of 2 months. There was no statistically significant difference in molecular biomarker testing received between non-Hispanic white and non-Hispanic black population (p=0.275) in the study. There was a statistically significant difference in molecular biomarker testing received between de novo (84% tested) and secondary (67% tested) AML (p=<0.001). NGS tested pts had a median time of 0 days from initial diagnosis to specimen drawn and 13 days from specimen drawn to report generation. 80% of pts first received NGS testing in the upfront diagnostic setting, 15% in the relapse or post diagnostic window (>30 days after diagnosis), with 5% missing relevant dates. 294 (78%) pts had NGS performed on bone marrow aspirate. NGS testing rates rose from 9% of pts diagnosed with AML in 2015, to 77% of pts in 2020. Among pts who received molecular testing (n=541), the proportions of pts tested for specific prognostic and actionable biomarkers by year of diagnosis are found in figures 1 and 2. 204 (38%) pts who received molecular testing had an actionable biomarker detected and of those 204 pts, 70 (34%) received at least one targeted therapy. The proportion of pts with one or more actionable mutations (FLT3, IDH1, IDH2) who receive targeted therapy is presented in table 1 below. Conclusions: Real-world data provide insights into molecular testing and targeted therapy patterns in routine clinical practice. In this study, testing uptake has increased over time with most pts diagnosed in 2020 receiving testing for FLT3-TKD, FLT3-ITD, IDH1, IDH2 and NPM1. Testing uptake did not differ by race. Among pts with a documented actionable alteration, one third received a targeted therapy. These findings show progress in testing for pts with targetable biomarkers in AML in the community setting, although further increases in testing and faster results could provide additional clinical benefit. Future directions for this work include analyzing patient outcomes. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Coutinho: Syapse: Ended employment in the past 24 months. Berry: Syapse: Current Employment, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Thompson: Doximity: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS (Celgene): Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Syapse Precision Medicine Council: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Lilly: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Elsevier ClincalPath (VIA Oncology): Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Strata Oncology Advisory Board: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; UpToDate - Plasma Cell Dyscrasia: Patents & Royalties; TG Theerapeutics: Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; LynxBio: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Epizyme: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Denovo: Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding; Hoosier Research Network: Research Funding. McCracken: Syapse: Current Employment, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Geverd: Syapse: Current Employment, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Law: Syapse: Current Employment, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Wolf: Syapse: Current Employment, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Brown: Syapse: Current Employment, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company; GenomiCare Biotechnology: Consultancy, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company; Sygnomics: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company. Kuriakose: Alexion: Speakers Bureau; Celgene, Takeda, Pfizer, Kedrion, Apellis, Sanofi-Genzyme, Chiesi, TG Therapeutics, CSL Behring, CTI Biopharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Via industry sponsored institutional clinical trials.: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

A Novel Methodology for Building Longitudinal, Patient-Centric Real World Datasets in Hemophilia A

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-146160 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 594-594

Author(s):

Mark W Skinner ◽

Gillian Hanson ◽

Tao Xu ◽

Richard Ofori-Asenso ◽

Richard H. Ko ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Real World ◽

Stock Options ◽

Research Funding ◽

Hemophilia A ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Real World Data ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Patient Reported ◽

Privately Held

Abstract Background: There are limited real-world data (RWD) available on the unmet needs of people with mild or moderate hemophilia A (PwHA). This population accounts for 40-52% of all PwHA, including nearly all women with hemophilia A (HA), and is under-represented in scientific literature (Michele, et al. Haemophilia 2014; Benson, et al. Blood Transfus 2018; Peyvandi, et al. Haemophilia 2019). Available claims data from payer databases are confined to billing codes, and lack key information on outcomes and disease characterization (e.g. severity, treatment response.) (Tyree, et al. Am J Med Qual 2006). Registry datasets can require resource-intensive data entry and potentially miss key information about care received at outside facilities, at home, or after patients switch providers (Gliklich, et al. Registries for Evaluating Patient Outcomes: A User's Guide. 2014). To address these data gaps, we developed a novel, patient-centered approach to create a longitudinal healthcare database from individuals with mild and moderate HA in the United States. This study assessed the feasibility of this approach, which integrates medical record data collected during routine clinical care along with patient-reported outcomes (PROs) to provide needed insights into this under-represented population. Methods: Recruitment began in June 2020 via a broad strategy of social media outreach, healthcare provider partnerships, and patient advocacy groups. Eligibility was confined to mild or moderate PwHA, confirmed via physician report within provider notes in combination with baseline factor VIII levels (>5-50% mild, 1-5% moderate.) This study received research ethics board approval and abides by the guiding principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. PwHA enrolled via an online record management platform, PicnicHealth. After signing authorization forms for collection of their electronic health records (EHR) and informed consent to share their de-identified data for research, participants were prompted to enter information on their care providers. Records were gathered from all providers, across any facility, retrospectively as records were available. (Figure 1) All records obtained were made available to the participants via a medical timeline. Records were translated to text via optical character recognition with human review. Data elements from structured text as well as disease-specific elements from narrative text were captured using natural language processing and supervised machine learning. All elements, including visit metadata, conditions, measurements, drugs, and procedures were mapped to standardized medical ontologies and reviewed by a team of nurses. (Table 1) Quality control was assessed via inter-abstractor agreement on outputs with physician review. Patient-reported bleed, treatment, and pain data were collected via online questionnaire for a subset of PwHA, with participants prompted to enter data every 2 weeks. Abstracted EHR data was linked to PRO responses in a de-identified dataset. Cohort and abstraction characteristics were summarized descriptively. Results: From June 1, 2020 to June 30, 2021, 104 PwHA met eligibility criteria for enrollment (65 [62.5%] mild; 39 [37.5%] moderate). Participants saw providers across 34 states in the US, 22.1% (23/104) were female, and 20.6% (14/68) of those with known race/ethnicity status were from minority groups. Records were gathered from a median of six care sites and 16 providers per participant. A median of 50 (IQR [21-93]) clinical documents from 11 years were processed for each PwHA. (Table 2) Inter-abstractor agreement to assess abstraction quality averaged 95.9% for condition, 99.5% for drug name, and 95.4% for drug start date. As of June 2021, the average PRO response rate was 90.3% (150/166 of all requests) and continues prospectively. Conclusions: The patient-centric data collection methods implemented in this study provide a novel approach to build longitudinal real-world data sets. Technology-enabled data abstraction showed consistent high quality when processing the heterogeneous clinical records across disparate providers and care sites, and direct engagement with patients complements potential gaps in the clinical record. Additionally, this approach provides needed data on groups under-represented in RWD and traditional PwHA cohorts, including those with mild and moderate disease and women with HA. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Skinner: ICER: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Spark (DMC): Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd/Genentech, Inc.: Honoraria; Pfizer (DMC): Honoraria; Bayer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; uniQure: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Research Funding; Freeline: Research Funding; BioMarin: Honoraria, Research Funding; IPA Ltd.: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company; National Hemophilia Foundation: Consultancy; Institute for Policy Advancement Ltd: Current Employment; WFH USA: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BCBS MAP: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hanson: PicnicHealth: Current Employment, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Xu: F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG: Current Employment. Ofori-Asenso: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Current Employment. Ko: Genentech, Inc.: Current Employment; Genentech, Inc.-Roche: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Cibelli: PicnicHealth: Current Employment. Nissen: Novartis: Consultancy; Actelion: Consultancy; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Current Employment, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Witkop: Roche Advisory Panel: Consultancy; National Hemophilia Foundation: Current Employment. Sanabria: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Current Employment, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company. Shapiro: Novartis: Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Other: Advisory board fees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Octapharma: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; OPKO: Research Funding; Prometric BioTherapeutics: Research Funding; Sangamo: Other: Advisory board fees, Research Funding; Sigilon Therapeutics: Other: Advisory board fees, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Kedrion Biopharma: Research Funding; Glover Blood Therapeutics: Research Funding; Genentech: Other: Advisory board fees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Bioverativ (a Sanofi company): Other: Advisory board fees, Research Funding; BioMarin: Research Funding; Agios: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Follow-up of More Than 5 Years in a Cohort of Patients with Hemophilia B Treated with Fidanacogene Elaparvovec Adeno-Associated Virus Gene Therapy

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-150541 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 3975-3975

Author(s):

Ben J. Samelson-Jones ◽

Spencer K. Sullivan ◽

John E.J. Rasko ◽

Adam Giermasz ◽

Lindsey A. George ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Stock Options ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Hemophilia B ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Adeno Associated Virus ◽

Privately Held

Abstract Fifteen patients with moderately severe to severe hemophilia B (factor IX [FIX] activity ≤2%) were treated with fidanacogene elaparvovec at a dose of 5e11 vg/kg as part of a phase 1/2a study. The study was 52 weeks in duration, after which patients were eligible to enroll in the long-term follow-up (LTFU) study of up to 5 years. All 15 patients completed the phase 1/2a study, and 14 patients were subsequently enrolled in the LTFU study. At the time of the data cut (December 2020), 13 patients were enrolled in the LTFU study, with follow-up ranging from >2.5 years to >5 years following vector administration. Over this period of time, fidanacogene elaparvovec remained generally well tolerated. As reported previously, 3 patients were treated with corticosteroids within the first 6 months of the phase 1/2a study. No patients have required treatment or re-treatment with corticosteroids in the LTFU study. There were no serious adverse events (SAEs) in the phase 1/2a study, and 3 patients reported SAEs in the LTFU study, none of which were considered treatment related. No patient developed an inhibitor or had a thrombotic event. No patients have developed hepatic masses or significant elevations in alpha-fetoprotein (AFP). Annual liver ultrasounds revealed only hepatic steatosis in one patient. Mean FIX activity levels by year remain in the mild hemophilia severity range: 22.8%, year 1 (n=15); 25.4%, year 2 (n=14); 22.9%, year 3 (n=14); 24.9%, year 4 (n=9); and 19.8%, year 5 (n=7) when evaluated centrally using the ACTIN/FSL one-stage assay. These levels have been associated with mean annualized bleeding rates ranging from 0-0.9 over the course of follow-up, and no patients have resumed FIX prophylaxis. Four patients have undergone 6 surgical procedures during the LTFU study, 4 elective and 2 emergent. There were no bleeding complications with these procedures, and the 2 emergent procedures (appendectomy and lumbar discectomy) were performed without the need of additional FIX. Overall, this represents the largest cohort of hemophilia B patients with a duration of follow-up up to 5 years following treatment with an adeno-associated virus gene therapy expressing a highly active variant of FIX. Fidanacogene elaparvovec remains generally well tolerated over a period up to 5 years postinfusion. While encouraging, more long-term data in a larger cohort of patients are needed to further characterize the safety and durability of fidanacogene elaparvovec, which is under way in an ongoing phase 3 study. Disclosures Samelson-Jones: Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Spark: Research Funding. Sullivan: Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Biomarin: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Octapharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Rasko: Imago: Consultancy; Cynata: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Gene Technology Technical Advisory Board: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; NHMRC Mitochondrial Donation Expert Working Committee: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Australian Cancer Research: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cure the Future Foundation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; FSHD Global Research Foundation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Australian Government: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer Inc: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Glaxo-Smith-Kline: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Spark: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; bluebird bio: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Genea: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Giermasz: BioMarin: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech/Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; ATHN: Consultancy; NovoNordisk: Consultancy; UniQure: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sanofi Genzyme: Consultancy; Bioverativ/Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sangamo Therapeutics,: Research Funding. George: CSL Behring: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; Avrobio: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Committee . Ducore: Octapharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Shire: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; HEMA Biologics: Consultancy, Honoraria. Teitel: Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Spark: Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy; Octapharma: Consultancy; CSL Behring: Consultancy. McGuinn: Biogen: Research Funding; Roche/Genentech: Research Funding; Shire/Baxalta: Consultancy, Research Funding; Spark: Research Funding. O'Brien: Pfizer Inc.: Current Employment, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Winburn: Pfizer Inc.: Current Employment, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Smith: Pfizer Inc.: Current Employment, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Chhabra: Pfizer Inc.: Current Employment, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Rupon: Pfizer Inc.: Current Employment, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company.

Download Full-text

Trial in Progress: Phase 1/2 Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Iov-2001, an Autologous, Non-Genetically Modified, Polyclonal T-Cell Product, in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) or Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma (SLL)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-145775 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 3846-3846

Author(s):

Javier Pinilla Ibarz ◽

Meixiao Long ◽

John Lister ◽

Jennifer A. Woyach ◽

Friedrich Graf Finckenstein ◽

...

Keyword(s):

T Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Stock Options ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Privately Held

Abstract Background Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors (ie, ibrutinib, acalabrutinib) are approved for treating patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL), and can mediate durable responses in some patients; however, relapses are common, primarily due to acquired mutations in BTK enzyme and/or phospholipase C gamma 2 (Albitar F, et al. J Cancer. 2015;6[5]:409-411. Maddocks KJ, et al. JAMA Oncol. 2015;1[1]:80-87. Woyach JA. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol. 2016;14[5]:330-333. Woyach JA, et al. N Engl J Med. 2014;370[24]:2286-2294.). Preclinical studies demonstrated successful generation and robust cytotoxicity of an autologous, non-genetically modified, polyclonal T-cell product (IOV-2001) from BTK-inhibitor-treated patients with CLL (Karyampudi L, et al. HemaSphere. 2019; 3[suppl 1; abstract PF447]), consisting of billions of peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs). Compared with pre-ibrutinib and treatment-naïve PBLs, those derived from post-ibrutinib blood samples demonstrated higher-fold expansion from peripheral blood and produced higher levels of IFNγ in response to non-specific T-cell receptor stimulation. Methods IOV-CLL-01 (NCT04155710) is an ongoing, first-in-patient, Phase 1/2, open-label, multi-cohort, dose-finding study designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of IOV-2001 in patients with CLL/SLL who are progressing or have progressed on ibrutinib or acalabrutinib treatment. PBLs are generated by T-cell expansion from 50 mL of the patient's blood in a 9-day manufacturing process at a centralized GMP facility. The PBL product is then cryopreserved and sent back to the treatment center for infusion into the patient. Treatment consists of a preparative regimen of lymphodepleting chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide IV 500 mg/m 2 and fludarabine IV 30 mg/m 2) for 3 days, followed by 2 days of rest, a single infusion of IOV-2001, and 6 doses of either low-dose (9 MIU SC) or high-dose (600,000 IU/kg IV) interleukin-2 (IL-2; Figure 1). Approximately 1 to 5 clinical sites in North America will treat ~39 to 70 patients across 4 cohorts in 2 phases (Table 1). The primary endpoint for Phase 1 (Cohorts 1a and 1b) is to determine the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) of IOV-2001 followed by IL-2, and for Phase 2 (Cohorts 2 and 3) is to evaluate efficacy of the RP2D of IOV-2001 followed by IL-2, as measured by objective response rate per investigator assessment. Patients ages ≥18 years, diagnosed with CLL/SLL with radiographically measurable disease, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, and meeting prior therapy criteria according to Table 2 are eligible for inclusion. Four US sites are currently active and enrolling patients. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Pinilla Ibarz: Sellas: Other: ), patents/royalties/other intellectual property; AbbVie, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Takeda: Speakers Bureau; AbbVie, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Novartis, TG Therapeutics, Takeda: Consultancy, Other: Advisory; MEI, Sunesis: Research Funding. Lister: Oncology Analytics: Other: Academic Board. Woyach: Gilead Sciences Inc: Other: Data & Safety; AbbVie Inc, ArQule Inc, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Janssen Biotech Inc, Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company,: Consultancy; AbbVie Inc, ArQule Inc, Janssen Biotech Inc, AstraZeneca, Beigene: Other: Advisory Committee; AbbVie Inc, Loxo Oncology Inc, a wholly owned subsidiary of Eli Lilly & Company: Research Funding. Graf Finckenstein: Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc.: Current Employment, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Jagasia: Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc.: Current Employment, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Samakoglu: Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc.: Current Employment, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Yadav: Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc.: Current Employment, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Li: Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc.: Current Employment, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Byrd: Novartis, Trillium, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Pharmacyclics, Syndax: Consultancy, Honoraria; Newave: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Vincerx Pharmaceuticals: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Pomalidomide-Dexamethasone Effectiveness in t(11;14) Positive Relapsed Multiple Myeloma in Real-World Setting

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-149336 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 3803-3803

Author(s):

Sudeep Karve ◽

Shaji Kumar ◽

Veronica Gonzalez De La Calle ◽

Silvia Mangiacavalli ◽

Chang-Ki Min ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Retrospective Study ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Real World ◽

Stock Options ◽

Research Funding ◽

Publicly Traded ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Real World Setting ◽

Privately Held

Abstract Background: Treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) commonly encompasses combination of drugs within the three drug classes including proteasome inhibitors (PIs), immunomodulators and (IMiDs), and monoclonal antibodies, both for newly diagnosed and relapsed disease. With increasing appreciation of disease heterogeneity based on underlying genetic abnormality, and demonstration of efficacy of venetoclax in patients with t(11;14) MM, the outcomes with commonly used MM regimens among the different cytogenetic subgroups are of great interest. Venetoclax, a BCL-2 inhibitor, is being studied in t(11;14) positive MM patients who have received at least two prior lines of treatment (NCT03539744; CANOVA). However, outcomes in previously treated t(11;14) MM patients using standard of care approaches in the real-world setting is limited. Patients and methods: This non-interventional, retrospective observational cohort study included patients with t(11;14) MM from the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) retrospective study of t(11;14) MM. From the overall cohort, patients with t(11;14) MM receiving pomalidomide + dexamethasone (PomDex) in ≥3 rd line were selected, similar to those being enrolled in the ongoing CANOVA trial. Patients were also required to have prior exposure to lenalidomide and a PI without a history of transplant within 16 weeks prior to PomDex initiation. Patients enrolled in a clinical trial were excluded. Overall best response, time to next therapy (TTNT) as a surrogate measure for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed after initiation of PomDex. All analyses were descriptive in nature and were conducted using SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Results: Fifty-two patients who met the inclusion criteria were analyzed. Median age was 63 years, 60% were male. Patients had a median of 3 prior lines at start of PomDex, at a median of 4.3 years from diagnosis; 52% had a prior transplant. A PR or better was observed in 34% of patients with PomDex. The median TTNT for this cohort was 6.1 months and median OS was 19.2 months. Conclusion: This retrospective study of non-trial patients with t(11;14) MM provides a benchmark for newer therapies in this patient population for comparison with both venetoclax dexamethasone in the ongoing CANOVA study as well as combinations using the pomalidomide backbone. Disclosures Karve: AbbVie: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Kumar: Roche-Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Astra-Zeneca: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; KITE: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Carsgen: Research Funding; Antengene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Oncopeptides: Consultancy; Beigene: Consultancy; Tenebio: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Adaptive: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding. Gonzalez De La Calle: Celgene-BMS, Janssen, Amgen: Honoraria. Mangiacavalli: GSK: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria. Kastritis: Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Genesis Pharma: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Esteves: AbbVie: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy. Delforge: Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Yee: Karyopharm: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Oncopeptides: Consultancy; Adaptive: Consultancy; GSK: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy. Arriola: AbbVie: Current Employment, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Ross: AbbVie: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company. Manthena: AbbVie: Current Employment, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Durie: Amgen, Celgene/Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen, and Takeda: Consultancy; Amgen: Other: fees from non-CME/CE services .

Download Full-text

Pre-Transplant Fecal Microbial Diversity Independently Predicts Critical Illness after Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-124902 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 3264-3264 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Fatima I. Adhi ◽

Eric R. Littmann ◽

Ying Taur ◽

Molly A. Maloy ◽

Kate A Markey ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Intensive Care ◽

Respiratory Failure ◽

Critical Illness ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Independent Predictor ◽

Fecal Microbiota ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Icu Admission ◽

Conditioning Intensity

Background Fecal microbiota composition is associated with important outcomes after allo-HCT including survival, relapse, GVHD, and infections. We previously demonstrated in a multicenter observational study that HCT patients present with fecal microbiota configurations that have lower diversity and are distinct from those of healthy individuals, and that pre-HCT microbiota injury predicts poor overall survival. Here, we hypothesized that pre-HCT fecal microbiota features predict development of critical illness post-HCT. Methods We analyzed 828 adults who received a first allo-HCT from 2009 to 2017 at a single institution who had an evaluable fecal sample in our biobank collected within the 10 days prior to cell infusion. The patients were heterogeneous with respect to transplant indication, conditioning intensity, graft source (cord blood, peripheral blood, marrow) and graft manipulation (CD34-selection). The V4-V5 regions of 16S rRNA genes of DNA extracted from fecal samples were amplified and annotated taxonomically. The outcome of interest was time to ICU admission, which was assessed using survival-analysis methods. The reason for admission to the ICU was evaluated for each subject. Results Seventy-five (9%) patients were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) between the day of cell infusion and day +50; the peak incidence of ICU admission occurred on day +10. The most common indications for ICU admission were respiratory failure (65%) and infection (27%). Patients were stratified based on fecal microbiota diversity, as assessed by 16S sequencing of stool samples collected prior to transplantation, into high (inverse Simpson index ≥4) and low (<4) diversity groups following a previously-published cutoff. Patients with low diversity pre-HCT had a strikingly higher risk of ICU admission than those with high diversity (HR 2.38 [95% CI 1.5-3.7], p <0.001, see the Figure). This association remained significant in a multivariate Cox proportional hazard model that accounted for conditioning intensity, graft source, graft manipulation, and the HCT-CI comorbidity index (multivariate p = 0.003). HCT-CI score was also an independent predictor of ICU admission. The association between pre-HCT fecal diversity and ICU admission was also significant when the outcome definition was limited to ICU transfers for reason of respiratory failure or sepsis (to the exclusion of such indications as hemorrhage, anaphylaxis, or isolated dysfunctions of the cardiac, renal, or neurological systems). Conclusion Pre-transplant fecal microbial diversity is an independent predictor of intensive-care-requiring critical illness in the post-HCT period. These observations highlight the pre-HCT period as a window of opportunity to (a) assess microbiota injury in conjunction with comorbidity evaluation, (b) inform selection of antibiotic prophylaxis, gut-decontamination, GVHD-prophylaxis, or conditioning regimens, and (c) intervene with microbiota injury-remediation or prevention strategies. Figure Disclosures Brereton: Seres Therapeutics: Other: Salary Support. Clurman:Seres Therapeutics: Research Funding. Slingerland:Seres Therapeutics: Other: Salary supported by Seres funding. Shah:Janssen Pharmaceutica: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding. Scordo:McKinsey & Company: Consultancy; Angiocrine Bioscience, Inc.: Consultancy. Politikos:Angiocrine Bioscience Inc: Research Funding. Gyurkocza:Actinium Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Barker:Angiocrine Bioscience Inc: Research Funding; Gamida Cell: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding. Perales:Kyte/Gilead: Research Funding; Miltenyi: Research Funding; MolMed: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; NexImmune: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bellicum: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Meyers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Nektar Therapeutics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Omeros: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria; Medigene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Giralt:Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Actinium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite: Consultancy; Johnson & Johnson: Consultancy, Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Miltenyi: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy. van den Brink:Merck & Co, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria; Acute Leukemia Forum (ALF): Consultancy, Honoraria; Magenta and DKMS Medical Council: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Juno Therapeutics: Other: Licensing; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Therakos: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seres Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Flagship Ventures: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Evelo: Consultancy, Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria. Pamer:Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Seres Therapeutics: Honoraria, Patents & Royalties; MedImmune: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Ferring Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Peled:Seres Therapeutics: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Easix As Prediction Score before CAR-T Cells Vs Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (alloHCT) for Relapsed/Refractory (r/r) Large B Cell Lymphoma (LBCL)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-139615 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 11-12

Author(s):

Felix Korell ◽

Thomas Luft ◽

Michael Schmitt ◽

Sascha Dietrich ◽

Anita Schmitt ◽

...

Keyword(s):

T Cells ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

B Cell Lymphoma ◽

Tumor Board ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Educational Activities ◽

Bulky Disease ◽

Car T Cells ◽

Car T

BACKGROUND: In a previous study we have shown that CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells do not appear to be inferior to alloHCT when used as standard cellular immunotherapy (CI) for patients with multiply r/r LBCL (EBMT 2020). The purpose of the present follow-up analysis was to further compare the risk profile of the 2 cohorts by applying the EASIX score (lactate dehydrogenase (U/L) × creatinine (mg/dL)/thrombocytes (109 cells per L)), and to assess if EASIX could be used as outcome predictor in patients with r/r LBCL undergoing CAR-T and alloHCT, respectively. METHODS: Eligible were all patients referred to our institution with relapsed/refractory (R/R) DLBCL and a tumor board decision recommending treatment with CAR-T cells between 07/2018 and 02/2020 and those recommending allogeneic donor search between 2004 and 2019. Patients with DLBCL transformed from CLL were excluded. EASIX was evaluated retrospectively using uni- and multivariable analyses (with regards to age, gender and number of failed therapy lines) and mortality using Cox regression analyses. RESULTS: 41 patients intended for CAR-T cells and 60 patients intended for alloHCT were included. In both cohorts nearly all patients had active disease at indication. Cohorts were comparable for sex, time from diagnosis, ZUMA1 eligibility, and PS, but CAR-T patients tended to be older (median 56 vs 51 years, p=0.093), and had more often primary refractory and bulky disease (p=0.004 and p=0.04, respectively). Median EASIX score across both cohorts was 1.50 (0.27-70.5), with significantly higher scores in the CART group both at indication (EASIX-ind; median 1.79 and 1.22 for CAR-T and alloHCT, respectively, p=0.031) and at conditioning for CI (EASIX-pre, median 2.24 vs 1.26, p=0.005). Median OS from indication was 475d for the CAR-T cohort vs 285d for the alloHCT cohort (p=0.88). On multivariate analysis, EASIX-ind was significantly associated with adverse OS if alloHCT was intended (HR per 2fold increase 1.43, 95%CI 1.08-1.90, p=0.013), but not if CAR-T was intended (HR per 2fold increase 1.16, 95%CI 0.88-1.53, p=0.3). After CI, 12-month estimates for NRM, relapse incidence, PFS, and OS for CAR-T vs alloHCT were 3% vs 21% (p=0.04), 59% vs 44% (p=0.12), 39% vs 33% (p=0.97), and 68% vs 54% (p=0.32). EASIX-pre predicted overall survival (OS) in both CAR-T (HR per 2fold increase 2.11, 95%CI 1.21-3.7, p=0.009) and alloHCT (HR per 2fold increase 3.69, 95%CI 1.54-8.31, p=0.003) cohorts. In the alloHCT group, the EASIX effect was largely driven by higher NRM risk with increasing EASIX-pre, while in the CAR-T group poorer OS with increasing EASIX-pre was largely relapse-related. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing CI for r/r LBCL, EASIX measured prior to conditioning can predict mortality after both CAR-T and alloHCT. If applied already at indication for CI, the predictive capacity of EASIX is weaker and no longer significant if CAR-T is intended. Further studies for validation of this data appear to be warrantable. Disclosures Schmitt: MSD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: PI of clinical trials on letermovir; TolerogenixX Ltd: Other: Co-Founder and shareholder; Hexal: Other: Travel grants , Research Funding; Apogenix: Research Funding; Kite: Other: Travel grants, educational activities and conferences; Novartis: Other: educational activities and conferences, Research Funding. Dietrich:Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; KITE: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Schmitt:Hexal: Other: Travel grants ; TolerogenixX LtD: Other: Co-founder, Part-time employee ; Therakos/Mallinckrodt: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: Travel grants . Dreger:Neovii: Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Riemser: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text