Survival Advantage to Allogeneic Transplant in Patients with Myelofibrosis with Intermediate-1 or Higher DIPSS Score

Abstract Introduction: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) is the only curative therapy for myelofibrosis (MF). Consideration of HCT is recommended by international working groups and national guidelines for MF patients (pts) age <70 with intermediate-1 with adverse indicators, intermediate-2 or high-risk disease by the Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS) for MF- a recommendation made in the absence of clear data indicating the optimal timing of HCT for MF. In this large multicenter retrospective study, we analyze overall survival in MF pts treated with and without HCT. Methods: Disease characteristics, treatments, and outcome data from MF pts receiving non-transplant therapy at 14 US academic medical centers between 2000-2014 were retrospectively collected. MF pts who underwent HCT were identified from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR). The Cox proportional hazards model was used. The reference time point (time zero) was time of referral for the non-transplant (non-HCT) arm and the time of transplant for the HCT arm. The main effect variable (HCT vs. non-HCT) violated the proportionality assumption where comparing to non-HCT, mortality was higher with HCT in early time period from time zero but then was lower in late time period; therefore, the comparison is presented as early time period and late time period. The Cox model identified 14 months from time zero as the ideal cut point to define early and late time periods. The proportionality assumption is satisfied within each of these two periods. Results: A total of 1377 and 551 pts were included in the non-HCT and HCT arms, respectively (Table 1). In the overall cohort, survival was higher with non-HCT vs. HCT in early time period (relative risk [RR]: 0.34, P< .0001, Figure 1D), but in late time period survival was lower with non-HCT vs. HCT (RR: 2.37, P< 0.001) (Table 2). In the DIPSS low-risk MF group, while survival was higher with non-HCT vs. HCT in the early time period (RR: 0.19, P=0.007, Figure 1A), survival was lower with non-HCT in the late time period, but the latter did not reach statistical significance (RR: 1.45, P=0.39). In the DIPSS intermediate-1 risk group, a survival advantage was present with non-HCT treatments vs. HCT in the early time period (RR: 0.27, P < .0001, Figure 1B), however survival was lower with non-HCT in the late time period (RR: 3.13, P < .0001). Similarly, in those with DIPSS intermediate-2 and high-risk MF, survival advantage was observed with non-HCT in the early time period (RR: 0.41, P< .0001, Figure IC), but survival was lower with non-HCT in the late time period (RR: 2.82, P < .0001). Conclusion: A long-term survival advantage with transplant was observed for pts with intermediate-1 or higher risk MF, but at the cost of potential early mortality. The magnitude of benefit increased as DIPSS risk score increased. Although this retrospective study has limitations, the results have an impact on clinical practice by suggesting that transplantation could be considered earlier in the disease course and supports the recommendation for consideration of HCT in the setting of intermediate-1 risk MF. Disclosures Gowin: Incyte: Consultancy, Other: Scientific Advisory Board, Speakers Bureau. Verstovsek:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy; Italfarmaco: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ali:Incyte Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Gupta:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding. Gerds:Celgene: Consultancy; Apexx Oncology: Consultancy; CTI Biopharma: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Cost Implications of Comorbidity for Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Elderly Patients with Multiple Myeloma Using SEER-Medicare

Bone Marrow Research ◽

10.1155/2016/3645623 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 2016 ◽

pp. 1-6 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Gunjan L. Shah ◽

Aaron Winn ◽

Pei-Jung Lin ◽

Andreas Klein ◽

Kellie A. Sprague ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Older Patients ◽

Early Period ◽

Early Time ◽

Cost Of Care ◽

Late Time ◽

Time Period ◽

Comorbidity Burden ◽

Impact On Survival ◽

The Difference ◽

Early Time Period

Comorbidity is more common in older patients and can increase the cost of care by increasing toxicity. Using the SEER-Medicare database from 2000 to 2007, we examined the costs and life-year benefit of Auto-HSCT for MM patients over the age of 65 by evaluating the difference over time relative to comorbidity burden. One hundred ten patients had an Auto-HSCT in the early time period (2000–2003) and 160 in the late time period (2004–2007). Patients were divided by a Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) of 0 or greater than 1 (CCI1+). Median overall survival was 53.5 months for the late time period patients compared to 40.3 months for the early time period patients (p=0.031). Median costs for CCI0 versus CCI1+ in the early period were, respectively, $70,900 versus $72,000 (100 d); $86,100 versus $98,300 (1 yr); and $139,200 versus $195,300 (3 yrs). Median costs for late period were, respectively, $58,400 versus $60,400 (100 d); $86,300 versus $77,700 (1 yr); and $124,400 versus $110,900 (3 yrs). Comorbidity had a significant impact on survival and cost among early time period patients but not among late time period patients. Therefore, older patients with some comorbidities can be considered for Auto-HSCT depending on clinical circumstances.

Download Full-text

Safety and Efficacy of Venetoclax-Based Treatment in Elderly CLL Patients: A Retrospective Study from the Filo Group

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-149640 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 3747-3747

Author(s):

Charlotte Doublet ◽

Marie-Sarah Dilhuydy ◽

Emmanuelle Ferrant ◽

Pierre Feugier ◽

Alexandra Fayault ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Retrospective Study ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Oncology Nurses ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival ◽

Daily Dose ◽

History Of

Abstract Median age at diagnosis of chronic lymphocytic leukemia is 72 years. However, only few patients over 80 years of age are included in clinical trials, even in those devoted to unfit patients. In order to evaluate both efficiency and safety of venetoclax in this category of patients, we conducted a multicentric retrospective study and collected data from 77 CLL patients from 19 FILO centers who started venetoclax after 80 years of age. Median age at venetoclax initiation was 86 years old (81-97). 63% of patients had a history of heart disease, 62% had renal failure (moderate 59% and severe 3%) and 29% had a history of severe infections. Despite their comorbidities and a CIRS greater than 6 in 70% of cases, their autonomy was preserved with a median performans status of 1 (0-4). In this comorbid geriatric population, pretherapeutic geriatric assessment was only performed in a single patient. The median number of prior therapies was 2 (0-6) with an exposure to a BCR inhibitor in 56% of cases. 11q and 17p deletion were found in 39% and 30% of cases respectively, 39% of patients had a complex karyotype and 30% harbored a TP53 mutation. However, in this real life population, these prognostic factors were only performed in half of patients. IGHV mutational status was only available in 11 patients, and 83% of them had unmutated IGHV. At the time of venetoclax initiation, the tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) risk was moderate in 57% of cases and high in 8% of cases. Venetoclax was administered as a single agent (42%) or in association with rituximab (58%). In total, half of the patients were hospitalized at each dose ramp-up, and only 3 patients were treated on outpatient basis. 82% of the cohort was able to reach the daily dose of 400mg. Half of the patients were included in a phone call monitoring program with oncology nurses to pre-emptively manage side effects and foster therapy adherence. The safety study reported 14% of TLS, with 2 discontinuations of treatment within the first month: one of which led to dialysis and the other to death. As in the previously published studies, 25% of patients had infectious complications, and grade 3 haematological and digestive toxicities were reported in 42% and 22% of cases, respectively. The reduction of the daily dose of venetoclax was necessary for 33%. Permanent discontinuation of venetoclax occurred in 40% of subjects, including 29% of early withdrawal (within the first 3 months). Main reasons for discontinuation were intolerance (21%), CLL progression (21%), death (21%) and scheduled treatment discontinuation (10%). The overall response rate was 86%, consisting of 49% of complete response (unconfirmed by bone marrow biopsy) and 37% of partial response. With a median follow-up of 21months, estimated progression free survival and overall survival were 29 and 38 months respectively. Prior exposure to a BCR inhibitor had no impact on progression free survival. To conclude, venetoclax has a manageable safety profile in elderly patients with comorbidities and can induce prolonged responses. Finally, if additional follow-up by oncology nurses seems to be more and more implemented, the pre-therapeutic onco-geriatric evaluation remains underexploited in this population. Disclosures Ferrant: AstraZeneca: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses; Janssen: Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses. Feugier: Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Astrazeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria. Laribi: AstraZeneca: Other: Personal Fees; Le Mans Hospital: Research Funding; AbbVie: Other: Personal Fees, Research Funding; Jansen: Research Funding; Novartis: Other: Personal Fees, Research Funding; IQONE: Other: Personal Fees; Astellas Phama, Inc.: Other: Personal Fees; BeiGene: Other: Personal Fees; Takeda: Other: Personal Fees, Research Funding. Tchernonog: JANSSEN: Consultancy; ABBVIE: Consultancy; ASTRAZENECA: Consultancy. Dartigeas: Astra-Zeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel grants/Congress; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel grants/Congress; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel grants/Congress. Quinquenel: Abbvie: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

COVID-19 in Patients with Lymphoma: A Grupo De Estudio Latinoamericano En Linfoproliferativos (GELL) Retrospective Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-142787 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 35-36

Author(s):

Guilherme Fleury Perini ◽

Juan Alejandro Ospina Idarraga ◽

Maria Alejandra Torres Viera ◽

Brady E Beltran ◽

Denisse A. Castro ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Latin America ◽

Monoclonal Antibodies ◽

Retrospective Study ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

B Cell Lymphoma ◽

Current Treatment ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Active Disease

Introduction: SARS-COV-2 pandemic has infected approximately 20 million people worldwide and more than 700.000 fatalities have been reported. Patients with malignant hematological diseases are at particular risk for unfavorable outcomes, including intensive care unit (ICU) admission, need for mechanical ventilation (MV) and death. There is paucity of data of the outcome of cancer patients with COVID-19 in low- and middle-income countries. GELL is a collaborative network of hematological centers in 13 countries in Latin America. In this retrospective study, we aimed to look at the outcome of lymphoma patients diagnosed with COVID-19 in Latin America. Methods: This is a retrospective study including patients with a diagnosis of lymphoma and COVID-19 infection. Patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma were excluded from the analysis. COVID-19 diagnosis was done by RT-PCR in all but 3 patients, in whom the diagnosis was done by serology. Active disease was defined as patients with detected disease in any setting (prior to therapy, relapse) or patients currently on treatment. Survival curves were plotted using Kaplan Meier method. Results: A total of 117 patients were available for analysis. Median age was 60 years old, and 44% of patients had at least one comorbidity, including 32% with hypertension, 17% with obesity, 11% with cardiovascular disease and 17% with diabetes. Most patients had aggressive lymphomas (67%), including 46% of patients with diffuse large B-Cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Follicular lymphomas was observed in 13% of patients and Hodgkin's lymphoma in 10% of patients. 84% of patients had active disease, and 70% of patients were currently on treatment. With a median follow up of 17 days from COVID-19 diagnosis, 78% were admitted to Hospital, 30% needed ICU support, and 27% needed MV. Importantly, 26% of patients died, most of them within 20 days from diagnosis (Fig. 1). There was no relation between active disease (p=0.23), current treatment (p=0.65) or use of monoclonal antibodies (p=0.24) with death. COVID-19 treatment data was available in 107 patients, and 72 of them received any treatment, being steroids, the most common treatment used (n=59). Conclusion: We confirm the dismal prognosis of patients with hematological malignancies and COVID-19 infection. In our cohort of Latin America patients with lymphoma and COVID-19, 26% of patients died with a median follow up of 17 days. No impact of current treatment or use of monoclonal antibodies were observed. Figure Disclosures Peña: Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sandoz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; BindingSite: Research Funding. Idrobo:Amgen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Tecnofarma: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Abello:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Dr. Reddy's: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Research Funding. Rojas:Novartis: Consultancy; Abbvie: Honoraria; Sandoz: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria. Castillo:Beigene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Kymera: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Villela:amgen: Speakers Bureau; Roche: Other: advisory board, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Outcomes in Multiple Myeloma Patients Progressing on Lenalidomide Maintenance

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-128441 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 1779-1779

Author(s):

Larysa Sanchez ◽

Erin Moshier ◽

Alexander Coltoff ◽

Ali Mustafa ◽

Darren Pan ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Retrospective Study ◽

Maintenance Therapy ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Single Agent ◽

Total Change ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Line Of Therapy

Introduction: Lenalidomide (R) maintenance therapy in multiple myeloma (MM) has been shown to improve progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) after autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT). Even in the transplant ineligible population, R until progression is associated with improved PFS. The ever-increasing use of R maintenance therapy, however, eventually leads to refractoriness to R at maintenance doses. Moreover, clinical trials with len-dex (Rd) backbone regimens including daratumumab, elotuzumab, ixazomib, and carfilzomib have all excluded such patients (pts). This is particularly an issue for elotuzumab and ixazomib, which have no single agent approval. There are currently no published data on the outcomes of full dose Rd or Rd backbone containing regimens in pts refractory to R maintenance. A prospective randomized trial would be difficult to perform given variability in pt factors (i.e. R tolerance, age, renal function) and disease factors (i.e. molecular risk and clinical vs biochemical progression). We therefore performed a retrospective study to characterize outcomes of pts on R maintenance therapy. Methods: This is a single-institution, retrospective study in which we reviewed the records of all consecutive pts with a diagnosis of MM at the Mount Sinai Hospital between February 2010 and October 2016. There were 465 pts identified who had maintenance R as a single agent or in combination with low-dose dexamethasone or prednisone. Pts were excluded if insufficient data were available or < 3 month (mo) follow up from time of initiation of R maintenance. Time to progression (TTP) on R maintenance, next line of therapy, and PFS on next line of therapy were determined using Kaplan Meyer analysis. Results: A total of 350 pts were included in this study. Baseline characteristics are summarized in Table 1. The median follow up time was 59 mos and median time on R maintenance was 21.0 mos. 172 pts (49%) progressed while on R maintenance or within 60 days of R discontinuation. 51 pts (15%) remain on R maintenance as of last follow up. The remaining 127 pts (36%) discontinued R for reasons other than progression and either progressed after 60 days (median 658 days, range 91-2053 days) or have not progressed. The median TTP on R maintenance was 34.2 mos (Fig 1A) and the majority of these were characterized by the treating physician as biochemical (65% during maintenance and 56% after R discontinuation). Of the patients with serologic and symptomatic progression, the majority were by bone disease (24% and 37%, respectively). 234 pts had data available on next line of therapy and the median PFS on this next line was 16.8 mo (95% CI: 13.2-20.1), however the PFS was shorter for those who had progressed while on R maintenance versus those who had progressed after R maintenance had been discontinued (13.2 mos vs. 28.9 mos, respectively, p 0.0001). The median PFS according to next line of therapy for those who received an increase in R dose + dex vs 3rd agent added to Rd backbone vs total change in therapy was 9.5 mos vs 21.0 mos vs 14.2 mos, respectively (Fig 1B). The most common drugs added to an Rd backbone were bortezomib and elotuzumab with an associated PFS of 19.0 and 40.1 mos, respectively. The majority of those receiving elotuzumab + Rd had progressed on R maintenance (15/18 = 83%). The most common regimens for those with a total change in therapy are summarized in Table 2. Conclusions: The median TTP on R maintenance was 34.2 mos and while most progression was felt to be biochemical, of those with symptomatic progression as well, the primary manifestation was bone disease (approximately 30% of patients), highlighting the importance of surveillance osseous imaging in MM. While an increase in R dose with steroids was associated with an additional 9.5 mos PFS and a total change in regimen with 14.2 mos PFS, those who received an Rd containing triplet had impressive results. In particular, Rd + elotuzumab resulted in a PFS of 40.1 mos. Multivariate analysis accounting for the potential confounding patient and disease factors inherent to treatment selection in retrospective studies will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures Cho: BMS: Consultancy; GSK: Consultancy; Takeda: Research Funding; The Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation: Employment; Genentech: Honoraria, Research Funding; Agenus: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Jagannath:Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Medicom: Speakers Bureau; Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy. Madduri:Abbvie: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; undation Medicine: Consultancy. Parekh:Celgene Corporation: Research Funding; Karyopharm Inc.: Research Funding; Foundation Medicine Inc.: Consultancy. Richter:Adaptive Biotechnologies: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Meyers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Chari:Millennium/Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Array Biopharma: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Oncoceutics: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

D.C.E.P. in Patients with Quad- or Penta-Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-117713 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2021-2021

Author(s):

Scott Goldsmith ◽

Mark A. Fiala ◽

Brandon B. Wang ◽

Mark A. Schroeder ◽

Tanya M. Wildes ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Retrospective Study ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Overall Response Rate ◽

Response Rate ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Salvage Regimen ◽

Overall Response

Abstract Introduction: Despite the recent introduction of novel agents for multiple myeloma (MM), the disease remains incurable and invariably progresses through these new therapies. Patients with quad-refractory MM (refractory to bortezomib, carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and pomalidomide) and penta-refractory MM (refractory to an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody as well) are left with few treatment options and poor prognoses. The chemotherapy regimen of dexamethasone, cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and cisplatin (DCEP) has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of relapsed/refractory MM. We and others employ DCEP as a salvage regimen, however, few outcomes data exist in this heavily pretreated population. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study to identify all patients who received DCEP for quad- or penta-refractory MM at our institution between 2013 and 2018. Disease response and refractoriness were defined by IMWG criteria. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) defined as PR or better. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and duration of response (DOR). Results: We identified 31 patients who received DCEP, 8 (26%) for quad-refractory and 23 (74%) for penta-refractory MM (Table 1). Twenty-eight (90%) had at least one autologous stem cell transplant, and one had a prior allogeneic transplant. Sixteen (52%) were female, 27 (87%) were white, and median age at DCEP was 60. Median number of prior treatment regimens was 8. All patients received dexamethasone (40mg/day), cyclophosphamide (400mg/m2/day), etoposide (40mg/m2/day), and cisplatin (10mg/m2/day) on days 1-4 (Lazzarino et al. 2001). Cycles were generally 28 days in length, but doses were delayed in cases of cytopenias or other toxicities. Dose reductions occurred in cases of renal impairment or prolonged cytopenias. Twenty patients (65%) received more than one cycle (range: 1-5). The overall response rate was 35%. One patient achieved CR allowing him to proceed to a second autologous transplant. One patient achieved a VGPR, 9 (29%) a PR. Four of the 8 (50%) quad-refractory patients responded compared to 7 of the 23 (30%) of the penta-refractory patients. Eleven (35%) were primary refractory to DCEP, and two patients died after one cycle prior to response assessment. The overall median PFS was 2.7 months (95% CI 1.5-3.8) and median OS was 6.2 months (95% CI 4.4-7.8). For responders, median DOR was 4.2 months (95% CI 3.0-5.4) and median OS was 9.0 months (95% CI 7.2-10.9). Conclusion: Quad- and penta-refractory MM carry a grim prognosis. In our retrospective study, DCEP led to a notable ORR of 35% (95% CI 19%-55%) in this very heavily-treated population, and suggests that it remains a reasonable salvage therapy. Furthermore, it supports prospective study of this regimen, possibly in combination or in comparison with other agents effective in quad- or penta-refractory MM. Disclosures Schroeder: Amgen Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Vij:Jansson: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Karyopharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Marrow Ring Sideroblasts Are Highly Predictive for TP53 Mutation in MDS with Excess Blasts

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-124772 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 4244-4244

Author(s):

David M Swoboda ◽

Jung-Hoon Lee ◽

Onyee Chan ◽

Rami S. Komrokji ◽

Najla Al Ali ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multivariate Analysis ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Tp53 Mutation ◽

Survival Advantage ◽

World Health ◽

Categorical Variables ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Ring Sideroblasts

Background: Myelodysplastic syndrome with ring sideroblasts (MDS-RS) is defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) as ring sideroblasts (RS) ≥15% or ≥5% with associated SF3B1 mutation and no excess blasts (EB). In MDS-RS, SF3B1 mutation defines a homogenous group with isolated erythroid dysplasia and favorable prognosis (Malcovati et al. Blood 2015). Given the separate WHO classification, patients with MDS-EB frequently are not tested for RS. SF3B1-wild type (wt) MDS with RS also has not been well characterized. Therefore, herein we characterized MDS with RS, focusing on SF3B1-wt and implications of molecular subsets. Patients and Methods: Between 2013 and 2018, 157 MDS and MDS/MPN patients with RS ≥5% and next generation sequencing performed within 6 months of diagnosis at Moffitt Cancer Center were identified with clinical variables obtained at date of diagnosis. Quantification of RS was performed in all cases by hematopathology. Baseline characteristics were compared by Fisher's exact test (categorical variables) and Mann-Whitney test (continuous variables). Survival estimates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method from date of diagnosis and groups were compared using log-rank test. Multivariate survival analysis performed by means of Cox proportional hazards regression. Pearson correlation coefficient was used in correlative analyses. Results: A total of 75 SF3B1-mutant (mt) and 82 SF3B1-wt cases with MDS (141) or MDS/MPN (13) and RS were identified. Median age was 71 years (38-89) with male and Caucasian predominance (62% and 94%, respectively). In the SF3B1-wt cohort, there were 77 MDS and 5 MDS/MPN patients. The MDS patients consisted of 2 MDS-SLD, 15 MDS-MLD, 3 MDS-RS-SLD, 17 MDS-RS-MLD, 24 MDS-EB1 and 16 MDS-EB2. The majority of SF3B1-wt patients (58%) were high or very high risk based on the Revised International Prognostic Scoring system (IPSS-R). Median RS% was significantly lower in SF3B1-wt compared to SF3B1-mt (18% (5-50) vs 35% (5-83) p <0.0001). TP53 was the most common mutation (54%) in the SF3B1-wt cohort (n=44; Figure 1). Additional mutations observed in >10% of the SF3B1-wt cohort were DNMT3A 18% (n=15), TET2 16% (n=13) and U2AF1 16% (n=13). Non-SF3B1 spliceosome mutations represented 27% (n=22) of the SF3B1-wt cohort. TP53-mt and non-SF3B1 spliceosome-mt were observed at significantly higher prevalence in SF3B1 wt vs mt patients (p<0.0001 and p=0.003). In univariate analysis, IPSS-R, TP53 and DNMT3A were associated with worse overall survival in SF3B1-wt patients (OS). In multivariate analysis including age, IPSS-R and BMT, only TP53 was an independent covariate for inferior survival (HR 6.3; 95% CI 2.4-16.6 p<0.0001). Given the high frequency of mutations, we then focused on TP53-mt RS patients. In the total cohort of patients with RS≥5%, 77% of MDS-EB1 and 68% of MDS-EB-2 were TP53-mt. In SF3B1 wt patients with RS≥5% and excess blasts, TP53 mutation was identified in 79% (n=19) and 81% (n=13) of MDS-EB-1 and MDS-EB-2 patients, respectively (p<0.0001 TP53-mt MDS-EB vs other). 3 patients were co-mutant for TP53 and SF3B1. Increased RS as defined as >15% vs 5-15% resulted in improved OS in the TP53-mt cohort (median OS 13.5 vs 8.6 months; HR 0.36 95% CI 0.14-0.93 p=0.034). In multivariate analysis including age, IPSS-R and BMT, the survival advantage was maintained (HR 0.35 95% CI 0.14-0.93 p=0.034). Increased RS did not significantly improve OS in any other somatic mutation. Response to hypomethylating agents was similar between TP53-mt RS >15% vs 5-15% (Complete remission (CR) 21% vs 17% p=1.0 and overall response rate (ORR) 52% vs 42% p=.72). No TP53-mt RS patients responded to lenalidomide (0/4). The proportion of patients receiving allogeneic stem cell transplant was similar between TP53-mt RS >15% vs 5-15% (14% vs 22% p=0.69). There was no difference in distribution of TP53-mt between 5-15% RS cohort vs >15% (55% n=26 vs 51% n=18 p=0.82). Finally, TP53 VAF did not correlate with RS percentage (p=.393) Conclusions: In our study, MDS-RS-EB was highly concordant with the presence of TP53 mutation occurring in 80% of SF3B1-wt patients. In TP53 mutant patients, increased ring sideroblast % was an independent covariate associated with a significant survival advantage. As therapy targeting TP53 emerges, the ability to rapidly predict TP53 mutation status based on presence of ring sideroblasts should be a priority. Figure Disclosures Komrokji: Agios: Consultancy; celgene: Consultancy; pfizer: Consultancy; DSI: Consultancy; JAZZ: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; JAZZ: Speakers Bureau. List:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Sallman:Abbvie: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Research Funding; Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Celyad: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Long-Term Outcome of Ruxolitinib Treatment in Patients with Myelofibrosis: Durable Reductions in Spleen Volume, Improvements in Quality of Life, and Overall Survival Advantage in COMFORT-I

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.800.800 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 800-800 ◽

Cited By ~ 8

Author(s):

Srdan Verstovsek ◽

Ruben A. Mesa ◽

Jason Gotlib ◽

Richard S. Levy ◽

Vikas Gupta ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Survival Advantage ◽

Primary Analysis ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 800 Background: Ruxolitinib (RUX), an oral JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor, reduced spleen volume (SV), improved myelofibrosis (MF)-associated symptoms and quality of life (QoL), and appeared to exhibit a survival advantage over placebo (PBO) in patients (pts) with MF regardless of JAK2V617F mutation status in the phase III COMFORT-I study. We describe long-term efficacy and safety of RUX from COMFORT-I, with 1 year of additional follow up beyond previously published data. Methods: Eligible pts (N=309) were randomized (1:1) to RUX or PBO. The primary analysis occurred when all pts completed 24 weeks (wks) and when half the pts completed 36 wks of treatment. All pts receiving PBO were eligible for crossover to RUX after the primary analysis; crossover before wk 24 was permitted if pts met protocol-defined criteria for worsening splenomegaly. The proportion of pts with ≥35% SV reduction at 24 wks (primary endpoint) and durability of SV response were assessed. Although symptom burden (measured daily using the modified MF Symptom Assessment Form v2.0) was only measured up to wk 24, QoL continued to be evaluated beyond wk 24 (every 24 wks) using the EORTC QoL Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30). Overall survival (OS) was assessed according to original randomized treatment. Results: In this updated analysis, median follow-up of pts randomized to RUX was 102 wks. All pts receiving PBO completed crossover or discontinued within 3 months of the primary analysis. Of 134 pts randomized to RUX who remained on treatment after the primary data analysis, 100 continue on study. Mean SV reduction in pts randomized to RUX was 31.6% at wk 24 and has remained stable with additional follow up through wk 96 (Table). In pts who achieved a ≥35% SV reduction, response was durable, with a median response duration of 108 wks. RUX treatment was also associated with durable improvements in the Global Health Status/QoL (Table) and the 5 functional domains of the EORTC QLQ-C30. Twenty-seven (27) pts randomized to RUX and 41 pts randomized to PBO died, representing a continued OS benefit in favor of RUX (HR=0.58; 95% CI: 0.36, 0.95; P = 0.028; Fig 1) similar in magnitude to that previously reported. OS favored RUX across subgroups including starting dose as well as baseline risk status and hemoglobin (Hgb). Of 34 pts randomized to RUX who discontinued after the primary analysis, 4 discontinued for an adverse event (AE). In pts who continued on RUX, anemia and thrombocytopenia remained the most frequently reported AEs. New onset of grade 3 or 4 anemia and thrombocytopenia was reported in only 12 and 5 pts, respectively. One pt discontinued for anemia. Overall, among all pts randomized to RUX, Grade 3 and 4 anemia regardless of baseline Hgb was reported in 37.4% and 14.8% of pts, respectively. Similarly, Grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia was reported in 11.0% and 5.2% of pts, respectively. These rates were similar to those reported in the primary analysis. By wk 36, the proportion of pts receiving red blood cell transfusions decreased to the level seen with PBO and remained stable thereafter (Fig 2). Rates of nonhematologic AEs adjusted for increased follow-up duration remain similar to those seen at the time of the primary data analysis. No additional cases of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in pts randomized to RUX were reported. Two pts originally randomized to PBO developed AML, 21 and 178 days after crossover to RUX. There continued to be no reports of a withdrawal syndrome after RUX discontinuation. Conclusions: RUX provides durable reductions in SV and improvements in QoL. Although all pts randomized to PBO crossed over to RUX shortly after the primary analysis, with 1 year of additional follow up, RUX continues to be associated with a survival advantage over PBO. RUX continues to be well tolerated; the AE profile with long-term treatment is consistent with that previously reported. The proportion of pts receiving transfusions decreased over time to rates similar to PBO, and there were no reports of a specific withdrawal syndrome or cytokine rebound phenomenon after RUX discontinuation. Disclosures: Verstovsek: Incyte Corporation: Research Funding. Mesa:Incyte: Research Funding; Lilly: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; NS Pharma: Research Funding; YM Bioscience: Research Funding. Gotlib:Incyte: Consultancy, travel to congress Other. Levy:Incyte: Employment, Equity Ownership. Gupta:Incyte: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; YM Biosciences: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sanofiå]Aventis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Catalano:Incyte: Consultancy. Deininger:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Ariad: Consultancy. Miller:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau, development of educational presentations Other; Incyte: development of educational presentations, development of educational presentations Other. Talpaz:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; B.M.S.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Ariad: Research Funding; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Teva: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Winton:Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria. Arcasoy:Incyte: Research Funding. Lyons:Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Telik: Research Funding. Paquette:Incyte: Consultancy. Vaddi:Incyte: Employment, Equity Ownership. Erickson-Viitanen:Incyte: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sun:Incyte Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sandor:Incyte Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kantarjian:Incyte: grant support Other.

Download Full-text

IgM Myeloma: A Multicenter Retrospective Study of 159 Patients

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.3276.3276 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 3276-3276

Author(s):

Jorge J. Castillo ◽

Artur J. Jurczyszyn ◽

Edvan Crusoe ◽

Jacek Czepiel ◽

Julio Davila ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Retrospective Study ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Reference Group ◽

Estimated Gfr ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Cytogenetic Abnormalities ◽

Lytic Lesions ◽

Male Sex

Abstract Introduction: IgM-secreting myeloma is rare, encompassing about 1% of all the myeloma cases. Given its rarity, the characteristics and survival of these patients have not been extensively studied. Therefore, we carried out a multicenter retrospective study in patients with IgM myeloma. Methods: The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of each participating institution. Clinical data were gathered and included age, sex, hemoglobin, calcium, LDH, estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR), presence of lytic bone lesions, International Staging System score, cytogenetic abnormalities, final outcome and overall survival (OS) time. OS was defined as the time in months from diagnosis to last follow-up or death. The Chi-square and the rank-sum tests were used to compare categorical and continuous variables, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate OS and the log-rank waas used to compare groups. The Cox proportional-hazard regression method was used to fit univariate and multivariate survival models, reported as hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). All reported p-values are two-sided, and were considered significant if less than 0.05. Results: A total of 159 patients with IgM myeloma from 20 centers from Europe, USA and Latin America were included in this analysis. Patients were diagnosed between 1996 and 2015. The median age at diagnosis was 65 years (range 37-86 years) with a male predominance (68%). The median serum IgM level was 2510 mg/dl (range 27-12,100 mg/dl) with 25% of patients having a serum IgM within normal limits but an IgM monoclonal spike detectable in serum electrophoresis. Hemoglobin levels <10 g/dl were seen in 49 patients (32%), serum calcium was elevated in 24 (16%), estimated GFR of 60 ml/min or less in 56 (37%), lytic lesions were detected in 86 (58%), and serum LDH was elevated in 28 (24%). ISS scores of 1, 2 and 3 were seen in 53 (36%), 63 (43%) and 31 (21%) of patients, respectively. Although immunohistochemistry and/or flow cytometry data were limited, CD20 expression was seen in 15/26 (58%) and cyclin D1 in 10/15 (67%) patients. The most common cytogenetic abnormalities were t(11;14) in 26/67 (39%), del13q in 25/76 (33%) and del17p in 6/76 (8%) patients. 149 patients (94%) received at least one line of systemic therapy for myeloma of which 13 (9%) received rituximab as part of initial therapy. After a median follow-up of 47 months, 74 patients (47%) have died. The median OS was 62 months (95% CI 51-79 months). Cause of death was known in 38 patients, and the most common was myeloma progression (74%). IN the univariate analysis, prognostic factors associated with a worse OS were age (HR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.06; p=0.01) and ISS score (ISS 2: HR 1.43, 95% CI 0.83-2.48; p=0.2, and ISS 3: HR 3.03, 95% CI 1.54-5.98; p=0.001, using ISS 1 as reference group), while male sex was associated with a better OS (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.34-0.90; p=0.02). Hemoglobin, calcium, estimated GFR and lytic lesions were not associated with OS. In the multivariate analysis, male sex was associated with a better OS (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.35-0.95; p=0.03) and ISS with worse OS (ISS 2: HR 1.57, 95% CI 0.89-2.74; p=0.12, and ISS 3: HR 2.76, 95% CI 1.38-5.55; p=0.004, using ISS 1 as reference group). Conclusion: Patients with IgM myeloma apparently present with similar clinical characteristics as patients with non-IgM myeloma. Pathologically, CD20 and cyclin D1 expression is common. The most common cytogenetic abnormalities identified were t(11;14) and del13q. Survival does not appear shorter than non-IgM myeloma patients, and the ISS appears to have similar prognostic value. Disclosures Castillo: Millennium: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Otsuka: Consultancy; Biogen: Consultancy; Abbvie: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria. Ghobrial:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Noxxon: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria. Hájek:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy. Hungria:International Myeloma Foundation Latin America: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Bristol: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Niesvizky:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Reagan:Alexion: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Richardson:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Spicka:Janssen Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millenium: Honoraria. Gertz:Celgene: Honoraria; Med Learning Group: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Research to Practice: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Alnylam Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Prothena Therapeutics: Research Funding; Ionis: Research Funding; NCI Frederick: Honoraria; Sandoz Inc: Honoraria; GSK: Honoraria; Annexon Biosciences: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Treatment Patterns and Outcomes in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Follicular Lymphoma Who Received Third Line Therapy at the Christie NHS Foundation Trust in the UK

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-148490 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 5011-5011

Author(s):

Kim Linton ◽

Cristina Julian ◽

Adam Gibb ◽

Ellie White ◽

Emma-Frances Armstrong ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Follicular Lymphoma ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Index Date ◽

Treatment Patterns ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Time Period ◽

Third Line ◽

Privately Held

Abstract Background: There are limited data on real-world treatment patterns and outcomes for follicular lymphoma (FL) in the relapsed/refractory (r/r) setting, with shorter response durations reported after each relapse (Link et al, 2019; Rivas-Delgado et al, 2019 and Batlevi et al, 2020). We examined treatment patterns for patients with FL initiating third line (3L) therapy at a single institution by time period in the post-rituximab era (2004-2010 and 2011-2020), and clinical outcomes for the overall cohort receiving therapy between 2004 and 2020. Methods: This is a retrospective, observational study of patients with FL who initiated 3L therapy between 2004 and 2020 in routine clinical practice at The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, UK. We selected patients aged ≥18 years at 3L initiation, with histologically documented FL Grade 1−3a treated with two prior lines of systemic therapy including an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody and an alkylating agent, and at least one year of follow-up after initiating 3L therapy; follow-up ended June 2021. We excluded patients with grade 3b FL or transformation to high grade lymphoma any time before 3L treatment. Overall response rate (ORR) and complete response (CR) to 3L therapy was calculated, and overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS) and time to next treatment (TTNT) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier (KM) method with 3L therapy initiation date as the index date. Results: Overall, 41 patients met all eligibility criteria; 11 and 30 patients received 3L therapy between 2004-2010 and 2011-2020, respectively. Median age at index date was 59 years and 53.7% were male; 73.2% had grade 1 or 2 FL; 78.1% had advanced stage (III/IV) FL at diagnosis. Median follow-up was 33.9 (IQR: 14.5, 63.0) months, and median time from diagnosis to 3L treatment was 60.2 (IQR: 29.4, 89.1) months. The most common regimen in 3L was rituximab plus bendamustine (R-benda) followed by rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) and rituximab used as a single agent (R-mono). Treatment patterns differed by time period (Table 1). R-benda was more commonly used between 2011 and 2020. The most common sequence was rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, vincristine and prednisone (R-CVP) followed by R-CHOP and R-benda (Figure 1). ORR to 3L treatment was 61.0%, CR 29.3%. Median OS, PFS and TTNT with 95% confidence interval (CI) were 70.0 (30.2-NR), 19.2 (9.5-34.7) and 11.8 (9.0-27.6) months after 3L initiation, respectively. Two- and five-year OS rates were 79% and 50%, and two-year PFS rate was 37%. Conclusions: Patients with r/r FL treated in the routine 3L setting have highly variable treatment patterns and unfavorable outcomes, representing a continued unmet medical need. This study is limited by its small size and evolving treatments, warranting a larger study of more recently treated 3L patients to evaluate the impact of modern treatment pathways and novel therapies on clinical outcomes for r/r FL. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Linton: University of Manchester: Current Employment; BeiGene: Research Funding; Hartley Taylor: Honoraria; Genmab: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Aptitude Health: Honoraria; Celgene: Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Julian: Genentech, Inc.: Current Employment, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Gibb: The Christie NHS Foundation Trust: Current Employment; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Li: Genesis Research: Current Employment. Liu: Genesis Research: Current Employment. Shewade: Genentech, Inc.: Current Employment; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Radford: BMS: Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company.

Download Full-text

Use of Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH) in Thrombocytopenic Patients with Hematologic Malignancy-Associated Venous Thromboembolism (VTE)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.3482.3482 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 3482-3482 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Nabin Khanal ◽

R. Gregory Bociek ◽

Baojiang Chen ◽

Julie M. Vose ◽

James O. Armitage ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Platelet Count ◽

Retrospective Study ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Hematologic Malignancy ◽

Categorical Variables ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Risk Of Bleeding ◽

Prophylactic Dose

Abstract Introduction: The management of hematologic malignancy-associated VTEin patients with moderate to severe thrombocytopenia is unclear. Clinical trials of anticoagulants in VTE exclude such patients, hence do not inform the risk of bleeding or clot progression. Consensus-based guidelines recommend case-by-case consideration for either platelet transfusion to maintain platelet count >50,000/µL and therapeutic anticoagulation, or 50% dose reduction in LMWH (J Thromb Haemost. 2013 Jan;11(1):56-70.; Curr Oncol. 2015 Apr;22(2):144-55). At our institution, our approach is to use prophylactic dose LMWH for patients with platelet count ≤50,000/µL. Method: This is a single-center retrospective study of 128 adult patients with hematologic malignancies, who were diagnosed with VTE. Patients were identified from hospital research database. The diagnoses were verified after the review of medical records. The platelet count was assessed during the period of anticoagulation for VTE. The outcomes of patients with significant thrombocytopenia (≤50,000/µL) was compared with those without. Bleeding and clot recurrence was assessed until the last follow-up (median of >1 month). Fisher's Exact test was used to test the association between two categorical variables, and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was used to test the association between a continuous variable and a categorical variable. Results: Characteristics of the study population were as follows: 51% male, 47% non-Hodgkin lymphoma, 20% acute leukemia/myelodysplastic syndrome, 40% status-post hematopoietic stem cell transplant, 9% with creatinine >2 mg/dl, 36% with pulmonary embolism and 28% with catheter-related VTE. Forty six patients (36%) had a platelet count ≤50,000/µL during a period of time of perceived need for new or continued anticoagulation. The median nadir platelet count in those with significant thrombocytopenia was 9000/µL( range 2000-45,000/µL) versus 166,000/µL (range 50,000-389,000/µL) in those without (p<0.001). The median duration of significant thrombocytopenia in the first group was 10 days (range 1-68 days). Therapy during the period of significant thrombocytopenia included prophylactic dosing of LMWH (46%), therapeutic dose of LMWH or heparin (30%), warfarin (2%), inferior vena cava filter (2%) and observation (17%). Patients without thrombocytopenia were managed with the standard of care therapy. At last follow-up, the risk of bleeding (p=0.65) and clot progression (p=0.81) were similar in the two groups (Table 1). Conclusion: Within the limits of this retrospective study, cautious use of dose-adjusted LMWH in thrombocytopenic patients with hematologic malignancy-associated VTE may be safe. A prospective trial of prophylactic dose LMWH in patients with VTE during thrombocytopenia is required to confirm the safety and, to some extent, efficacy of such an approach. Table 1. Outcome of patients with VTE Outcome Thrombocytopenic cohort (Platelet count ≤50,000/µL) Patients without significant thrombocytopenia (Platelet count >50,000/µL) p-value Bleeding after VTE treatment 0.65 No 38 (82.6%) 75 (91.5%) Minor (without significant clinical implications) 1 (2.2%) 1 (1.2%) Clinically significant (causing drop in hemoglobin; requiring transfusion or other interventions) 4 (8.7%) 5 (6.1%) Missing 3 (6.5%) 1 (1.2%) Clot progression or recurrence at last follow-up 0.81 No 35 (76.1%) 67 (81.7%) Yes 9 (19.6%) 15 (18.3%) Missing 2 (4.3%) 0 Disclosures Vose: Allos Therapeutics/Spectrum: Research Funding; US Biotest, Inc: Research Funding; Janssen Biotech: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Incyte Corp: Research Funding; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding. Armitage:Celgene: Consultancy; Ziopharm: Consultancy; Spectrum: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Conatus: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Tesaro Bio, Inc: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lunning:Spectrum: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Juno: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy.

Download Full-text