scholarly journals First Line Chemo-Free Therapy with the BRAF Inhibitor Vemurafenib Combined with Obinutuzumab Is Effective in Patients with Hcl

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3998-3998
Author(s):  
Jae H. Park ◽  
Madhulika Shukla ◽  
Jose M Salcedo ◽  
Shreya Vemuri ◽  
Julie C Kinoshita ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Hairy Cell Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Braf Inhibitor ◽  
Digital Pcr ◽  
Hairy Cell ◽  
Cell Leukemia ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Dose Reductions

Background: We have previously reported initial high response rates of the BRAF inhibitor, vemurafenib, in patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory hairy cell leukemia (HCL) (Tiacci and Park et al. NEJM 2015). However, complete response (CR) rates were low at 35-40% with detectable minimal residual disease (MRD) in most patients, and a longer follow up revealed a relapse rate of 50% (Park JH et al. Blood 2018, 132;392). Based on the recent data suggesting improved CR rate in combination with rituximab in relapsed HCL (Tiacci et al. Blood 2016, 128:1214), we initiated a phase II clinical trial to investigate the efficacy of vemurafenib and obinutuzumab in patients with newly diagnosed HCL (NCT03410875). Methods: Adult pts with previously untreated HCL who met the treatment initiation criteria (i.e. ANC <1.0k/ul, Hgb <10.0g/dL or PLT <100k/ul) are eligible for the study. Patients received vemurafenib 960mg bid from months 1-4 and obinutuzumab from months 2-4, for a total treatment duration of 4 months. Obinutuzumab was administered at 1000mg IV on days 1, 8, and 15 of month 2, and day 1 of month 3 and 4. Vemurafenib dose reductions were allowed for drug-related adverse events (AEs). Response was assessed at the end of month 4 with bone marrow (BM) biopsy and CT scans. The primary objective was to determine the efficacy of vemurafenib and obinutuzumab combination as assessed by CR rates, and the secondary objectives include assessment of safety, duration of response, MRD negativity, and BRAF allele burden by digital PCR. The study adopted a Simon's minimax 2-stage design and required ≥7 CR in the first 9 pts in the first stage to continue accrual for a total of 28 pts. We report the result of the first 9 pts in the first stage of the study. Results: A total of 11 pts have been enrolled to the study to date. The median age of the patients is 49 years old (range, 35-79). The median pretreatment ANC, Hgb and PLT is 0.7k/ul (range, 0.0-2.6), 11.5g/dL (range, 7.0-15.0), and 83k/ul (range, 21-153), respectively. Nine of 11 pts had a baseline splenomegaly. Nine pts completed all treatments to date, and 2 pts remain on active therapy. Among the 9 pts who completed the treatment, all pts achieved a response with normalization of cytopenia, including 7 pts with MRD negative CR and 2 pts with PR at the end of month four. Two pts with PR at month 4 converted to MRD+ and MRD negative CR by month 7 and 10, respectively, with no further treatment, with the best overall CR rate of 100% (9/9 pts) (Figure). All MRD negative CR had undetectable BRAFV600E by highly sensitive digital PCR. After 1 month of vemurafenib and before the first dose of obinutuzumab, 7 of 9 pts had ANC recovery to >1.0K/ul and 8 of 9 pts had Hgb >10 g/dL and PLT 100k/uL. With a median follow-up of 9.7 months (range, 4.6-15.4), all pts remain in remission with no relapse. The most common vemurafenib-related AEs were rash (73%; Gr2-9%, Gr3-64%), arthralgia (64%; Gr1-27%, Gr2-27%, Gr3-18%), alopecia (45%, all Gr1), dry skin (27%, all Gr1), and fatigue (27%, Gr1). Two pts experienced obinutuzumab infusion reaction but were able to complete all intended doses of obinutuzumab. No case of cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas has been observed. No pt discontinued the therapy due to toxicity but 8 pts had vemurafenib dose reductions due to rash (n=5) and arthralgia (n=2). Conclusion: Vemurafenib and obinutuzumab combination therapy induced a high CR rate of 100% and high rates of MRD negativity (89%) in patients with HCL in the frontline setting and appears to be a promising chemo-free targeted therapeutic approach for HCL. A majority of the pts achieved a normalization of cytopenia within 4 weeks of starting therapy. A longer follow-up is needed to assess durability of remission and degree of immunosuppression compared to cladribine-treated cohorts. Figure Disclosures Park: Kite Pharma: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; GSK: Consultancy; Autolus: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Allogene: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy. Winer:Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer: Consultancy. Tallman:Cellerant: Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; KAHR: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BioLineRx: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Nohla: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Rigel: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncolyze: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Orsenix: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Biosight: Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; UpToDate: Patents & Royalties; Tetraphase: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Delta Fly Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cellerant: Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Vemurafenib and obinutuzumab for treatment of hairy cell leukemia

A Distributed International Patient Data Registry for Hairy Cell Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 5986-5986
Author(s):  
Leslie A. Andritsos ◽  
Michael R. Grever ◽  
Mirela Anghelina ◽  
Claire E Dearden ◽  
Monica Else ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Hairy Cell Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Patient Data ◽  
Hairy Cell ◽  
Cell Leukemia ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Web Based ◽  
Data Registry ◽  
The Web

Abstract BACKGROUND: The study of rare diseases is limited by the uncommon nature of the conditions as well as the widely dispersed patient populations. Current rare disease registries such as the National Organization of Rare Diseases utilize centralized platforms for data collection; however because of their broad nature, these do not always capture unique, disease specific elements. Hairy Cell Leukemia (HCL) is a rare leukemia globally with approximately 900 new cases diagnosed in the US each year. The HCL Foundation undertook creation of a Patient Data Registry that collects data from multiple HCL Centers of Excellence (COE) around the globe to better understand the complications, treatment outcomes, disease subtypes, comorbid conditions, epidemiology, and quality of life of patients with HCL. METHODS: Investigators at The Ohio State University Department of Biomedical Informatics and Division of Hematology in collaboration with the HCL Foundation developed a Patient Data Registry (PDR) for the longitudinal capture of high quality research data. This system differs from other registries in that it uses a federated( rather than centralized) architecture, wherein data is queried and integrated in an on-demand manner from local registry databases at each participating site. Further, the data collected for use in the registry combines both automated exports from existing electronic health records (EHRs) as well as additional data entered via a set of web-based forms. All manually entered data comes from source documents, and data provenance spanning electronic and manually entered data is maintained via multiple technical measures. Patients may be enrolled at HCL COE, or, if they do not have access to a COE they may enroll via a web-based portal (www.hairycellleukemia.org). At this time due to regulatory requirements the web-based portal is available to US patients only. All data are de-identified (see Figure 1: De-Identification Workflow) which reduces regulatory burden and increases opportunities for data access and re-use. End users have access to data via a project-specific query portal. RESULTS: The Patient Data Registry has been deployed at The Ohio State University, Royal Marsden Hospital, and MD Anderson Cancer Center, and is undergoing deployment at the University of Rochester. Up to 25 international HCL COE may participate. In addition, US patients are actively entering the registry via the web-based portal. To date, 227 patients have been consented to the registry with 119 of these being via the web-based entry point. CONCLUSION: We created an international and web-based patient data registry which will enable researchers to study outcomes in HCL in ways not previously possible given the rarity of the disease. This work was made possible by research funding from the Hairy Cell Leukemia Foundation. Figure De-Identification Workflow Figure. De-Identification Workflow Disclosures Andritsos: Hairy Cell Leukemia Foundation: Research Funding. Anghelina:Hairy Cell Leukemia Foundation: Research Funding. Lele:Hairy Cell Leukemia Foundation: Research Funding. Burger:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Delgado:Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis/GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Infinity: Research Funding. Jones:AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Lozanski:Beckman Coulter: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Stemline Therapeutics Inc.: Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Research Funding. Montserrat:Morphosys: Other: Expert Testimony; Vivia Biotech: Equity Ownership; Gilead: Consultancy, Other: Expert Testimony; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: travel, accommodations, expenses. Parikh:Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding. Park:Genentech/Roche: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Robak:Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Tam:janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Heckler:Hairy Cell Leukemia Foundation: Research Funding. Payne:Hairy Cell Leukemia Foundation: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of the Bruton Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Ibrutinib in Patients with Hairy Cell Leukemia: Stage 1 Results of a Phase 2 Study

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 1215-1215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Jones ◽  
Leslie Andritsos ◽  
Robert J. Kreitman ◽  
Farhad Ravandi ◽  
Charles Schiffer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Hairy Cell Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Hairy Cell ◽  
Cell Leukemia ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background : Effective therapy for classical hairy cell leukemia (c-HCL) refractory to purine nucleoside analog (PNA) treatment is limited, and there are no accepted treatment standards for variant hairy cell leukemia (v-HCL). Ibrutinib, an oral small molecule inhibitor of Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK), has shown single-agent efficacy and acceptable tolerability in patients with various B-cell malignancies, including chronic lymphocytic leukemia, mantle cell lymphoma, and Waldenstrom's. While BTK is expressed in HCL cells, the clinical activity of ibrutinib in this disease has not been previously assessed. We conducted a single-arm, multi-center phase 2 study (NCI #9268) of single-agent ibrutinib to characterize the overall response rate (complete + partial response) and safety of single-agent ibrutinib treatment for HCL. Methods : Patients with c-HCL (unfit for or relapsed after PNA) and v-HCL (relapsed or treatment-naïve) were eligible. Enrolled patients required treatment, had ECOG ≤ 2, no active infection, and preserved end-organ function. Patients received continuous once daily ibrutinib in 28-day cycles. Using a Simon 2-stage design, the first 13 patients were treated at 420 mg daily, and a second cohort of 13 patients was accrued at the 840 mg dose-level. Ultimately, the pre-specified number of objective responses was reached at the 420 mg dose-level, and accrual to the second stage of the design continues at that dose. Response, including bone marrow biopsy with immunohistochemistry for minimal residual disease (MRD), was assessed after 8 and 12 cycles. Patients experiencing clinical benefit may continue ibrutinib until unacceptable toxicity or progressive disease. Results: As of 15 May 2016, 28 patients had been enrolled and were evaluable for response: 420 mg/day (n=15) and 840 mg/day (n=13). Enrolled patients (1 treatment-naïve v-HCL, 10 relapsed v-HCL, 17 relapsed c-HCL) included 22 male and 6 female patients with median age 65 years (range: 43-78). Relapsed patients received median 4 prior therapies (range: 1-11); all had prior PNA, 81% had prior rituximab, and 3 c-HCL patients had prior vemurafenib. Response data are summarized by dose and histology in the table. To date, the ORR is 46% [4 CR (all c-HCL) and 9 PR (6 c-HCL)], with objective responses more commonly observed in patients with c-HCL. Eight additional patients (29%) with stable disease have experienced clinical benefit (resolution of symptoms, improvement in peripheral blood cell counts) not meeting criteria for PR, most commonly attributable to persistent thrombocytopenia, and continue on treatment. At median follow-up of 22 months, 20 patients (71%) remain on treatment, 3 patients (1 v-HCL, 2 c-HCL) have progressed, 2 patients (c-HCL) with severe neutropenia at baseline (c-HCL) had early deaths from pneumonia, 1 (c-HCL) discontinued during cycle 8 for failure to resolve baseline neutropenia, and 2 other patients (v-HCL) have discontinued for adverse events. Estimated 24-month progression-free survival (PFS) was 79% (95% CI: 57-91%) and the median PFS has not been reached. Redistribution lymphocytosis was observed in patients with circulating disease at baseline. Soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sIL2R) level was increased at baseline in all c-HCL patients for whom data were available and correlated with response. In general, toxicity did not differ by dose level or disease histology. The most frequent (>10%) grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) were lymphopenia (21%), neutropenia (18%), lung infection (18%), thrombocytopenia (14%), hypophosphatemia (11%), and hypertension (11%). Common grade 1/2 non-hematologic toxicities included myalgia (57%), diarrhea (54%), fatigue (50%), nausea/vomiting (46%), bruising (46%), and rash (46%); grade 1/2 atrial fibrillation (no grade ≥3) was observed in 5 patients. Grade ≥3 infection was observed in 25%, but no grade ≥3 bleeding AEs were reported. Conclusions: Ibrutinib can induce remission in both c-HCL and v-HCL patients, including heavily pre-treated patients, but complete remissions have only been observed in c-HCL to date. The drug is generally well-tolerated during long-term administration, and durable clinical benefit is observed in the majority of treated patients even when objective response criteria are not met. Table 1. Table 1. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Jones: Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Lozanski:Stemline Therapeutics Inc.: Research Funding; Beckman Coulter: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Research Funding.

Trametinib for the Treatment of IGHV4-34, MAP2K1 Mutant Variant Hairy Cell Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 5598-5598 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leslie A. Andritsos ◽  
Mirela Anghelina ◽  
Nicole R. Grieselhuber ◽  
Sameek Roychowdhury ◽  
Julie Reeser ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Skin Rash ◽  
Hairy Cell Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Unrelated Donor ◽  
Hairy Cell ◽  
Cell Leukemia ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Skin Nodules ◽  
Skin Biopsies

Abstract Background: Mutations of MAP2K1, which encodes MEK1, have been identified in up to half of patients with variant Hairy Cell Leukemia (vHCL).[Waterfall et al., Nat Gen 2014, Mason et al., Leukemia & Lymphoma 2016], and have been associated with vHCL with IGHV4-34 gene usage, which This form of HCL tends to have a worse prognosis than classic HCL or wild type vHCL (Arons et al., Blood 2009), with inferior responses to chemotherapy and shorter durations of remission. Trametinib, an oral inhibitor of MEK1 and MEK2, is FDA approved for treatment of patients with BRAF p.V600E mutant melanoma. We hypothesized that this MEK inhibitor would have activity in MAP2K1 mutant vHCL. Case Report: The patient is a 52 year old man with a history of CD25+, BRAF wildtype, IGHV4-34 usage vHCL diagnosed in 2005. His previous treatments included cladribine, BL22, pentostatin/rituximab, splenectomy, single agent rituximab, ibrutinib, bendamustine/rituximab, and allogeneic transplantation from a matched unrelated donor. The patient experienced disease relapse day +350 post transplant when he developed skin nodules as well as a generalized skin rash. The skin rash appeared clinically consistent with acute GVHD. However, when biopsies of both the skin nodules and skin rash were performed he was found to have relapsed vHCL. He was consented for paired tumor and germline next generation sequencing with a 25-gene amplicon panel which revealed a somatic MAP2K1 K57N mutation that has been shown to constitutively activate MEK [Marks et al., Cancer Res 2008]. As the patient had exhausted the majority of available treatment options, he was prescribed trametinib 2 mg po daily (commercial supply, according to approved melanoma dosing). Within a week of therapy initiation his skin nodules were markedly diminished in size and his generalized rash had resolved. He did develop a new acneiform rash over his face consistent with drug toxicity. This was managed with topical agents with improvement and did not require a dose reduction. Disease restaging following cycle 2 of therapy showed near complete resolution of skin nodules, with disappearance of visible skin rash. Repeat bone marrow biopsy showed unchanged hairy cell index. Skin biopsies were repeated and phospho-ERK (T202/Y204) staining of skin biopsies pre- and post-trametinib were performed (Figure 1). This showed diminished lymphocyte involvement on H&E staining with a decrease in p-ERK expression on immunostaining, indicative of decreased signaling downstream of MEK and consistent with on target trametinib effects. As of this writing, the patient has remained on trametinib for 12 weeks with no recurrence of leukemia cutis rash. Discussion: MEK inhibition with the oral MEKi trametinib is a well tolerated therapy with clinical activity in MAP2K1 mutant vHCL. Additional studies of this agent are warranted. Optimal dose and duration of therapy will need to be explored in prospective clinical trials. Figure 1 Skin biopsies pre- and post-trametinib. (A)(C) H&E staining shows diminished lymphocyte involvement. (B)(D) PhosphoERK immunostaining shows decrease of phosphoERK expression. Bar = 500 μm Figure 1. Skin biopsies pre- and post-trametinib. (A)(C) H&E staining shows diminished lymphocyte involvement. (B)(D) PhosphoERK immunostaining shows decrease of phosphoERK expression. Bar = 500 μm Disclosures Andritsos: Hairy Cell Leukemia Foundation: Research Funding. Anghelina:Hairy Cell Leukemia Foundation: Research Funding. Lozanski:Boehringer Ingelheim: Research Funding; Beckman Coulter: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Stemline Therapeutics Inc.: Research Funding. Jones:Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Vemurafenib As First Treatment of Hairy Cell Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 5482-5482
Author(s):  
Gregory Cheng ◽  
Gym Cheng ◽  
Natalie Pui Ha Chan ◽  
Chris Wong ◽  
Raymond S Wong
Keyword(s):  
Complete Remission ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Hairy Cell Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Lymphoid Cells ◽  
Hairy Cell ◽  
Cell Leukemia ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Braf V600 Mutation

Abstract 44 years old lady presented with fever and pancytopenia in March 2014.CXR showed bilateral pneumonia. Hb 7.5xg/dl, plt 42x x109/l, wbc 1.2 x19neutrophils22%, lymphocytes75%.Circulating lymphocytes with hairy cytoplasmicprojections and indented nuclei were noted. Flow cytometry showed these abnormal lymphoid cells were CD19+ve, CD5-ve, CD 23-ve, FMC7+ve, CD25+ve, CD11c+ve and CD103+ve.Bone marrow biopsy revealed a hypercellular marrow with dense infiltration of lymphoid cells of the same immunophenotype. Braf V600 mutation was detected. Cladribine or pentostatin was out of stock and import of these drugs would take at least 2 months. In view of the severe pancytopenia and on -going infection, various treatment options were discussed with, the patient .Patient decided to start on vemurafenib 960mg twice daily while awaiting cladribine. After 8weeks of treatment, the peripheral blood counts were normalized. Hb 12.2g/dl, plt 153x x109/l, wbc 3.1x109/l, neutrophils 53%,lymphocytes 40%. Braf V600 mutation was no longer detected. Vemurafenib was well tolerated and the patient received treatment mainly as outpatient. Vemurafenib was discontinued after 8 weeks and the patient then received a 5-day course of cladribine. She remained in complete remission Discussion Vemurafenib had shown to be safe and effected in hairy cell leukemia patients who were refractory to or who relapsed after purine analogs.1,2 Still to be determined are the correct vemurafenib dosing strategy, the best timing , duration and scheduling of vemurafenib. Due to unusual circumstances, our patient received 8 weeks of vemurafenib as first line therapy. The patient achieved a complete remission with minimal residual disease. Follow data is needed to see how long the patient remains in remission 1. N Engl J Med 2014; 370:286-288 2. 19th Congress of the European Hematology Association (EHA): Abstract S696. Disclosures Off Label Use: Vemurafenib as first treatment of Hairy Cell Leukemia. Wong:johnson &johnson: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Biogen-Idec: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer, MSD, Roche, BMS, Baxter, Amgen, Alexion: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Moxetumomab pasudotox in heavily pre-treated patients with relapsed/refractory hairy cell leukemia (HCL): long-term follow-up from the pivotal trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. Kreitman ◽  
◽  
Claire Dearden ◽  
Pier Luigi Zinzani ◽  
Julio Delgado ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hairy Cell Leukemia ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Braf Inhibitor ◽  
Nucleoside Analogs ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Hairy Cell ◽  
Cell Leukemia ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

Abstract Background Moxetumomab pasudotox is a recombinant CD22-targeting immunotoxin. Here, we present the long-term follow-up analysis of the pivotal, multicenter, open-label trial (NCT01829711) of moxetumomab pasudotox in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) hairy cell leukemia (HCL). Methods Eligible patients had received ≥ 2 prior systemic therapies, including ≥ 2 purine nucleoside analogs (PNAs), or ≥ 1 PNA followed by rituximab or a BRAF inhibitor. Patients received 40 µg/kg moxetumomab pasudotox intravenously on Days 1, 3, and 5 of each 28-day cycle for up to six cycles. Disease response and minimal residual disease (MRD) status were determined by blinded independent central review. The primary endpoint was durable complete response (CR), defined as achieving CR with hematologic remission (HR, blood counts for CR) lasting > 180 days. Results Eighty adult patients were treated with moxetumomab pasudotox and 63% completed six cycles. Patients had received a median of three lines of prior systemic therapy; 49% were PNA-refractory, and 38% were unfit for PNA retreatment. At a median follow-up of 24.6 months, the durable CR rate (CR with HR > 180 days) was 36% (29 patients; 95% confidence interval: 26–48%); CR with HR ≥ 360 days was 33%, and overall CR was 41%. Twenty-seven complete responders (82%) were MRD-negative (34% of all patients). CR lasting ≥ 60 months was 61%, and the median progression-free survival without the loss of HR was 71.7 months. Hemolytic uremic and capillary leak syndromes were each reported in ≤ 10% of patients, and ≤ 5% had grade 3–4 events; these events were generally reversible. No treatment-related deaths were reported. Conclusions Moxetumomab pasudotox resulted in a high rate of durable responses and MRD negativity in heavily pre-treated patients with HCL, with a manageable safety profile. Thus, it represents a new and viable treatment option for patients with R/R HCL, who currently lack adequate therapy. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01829711; first submitted: April 9, 2013. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01829711

Bendamustine and Rituximab for the Treatment of Multiply Relapsed Hairy Cell Leukemia,

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 3909-3909
Author(s):  
Robert J. Kreitman ◽  
Maryalice Stetler-Stevenson ◽  
Wyndham H. Wilson ◽  
Sapolsky Jeffrey ◽  
Laura Roth ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Hairy Cell Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Hairy Cell ◽  
Cell Leukemia ◽  
Purine Analog ◽  
Prospective Phase ◽  
Dose Levels

Abstract Abstract 3909 Background: Hairy cell leukemia (HCL) is highly sensitive to purine analogs cladribine (CdA) and pentostatin (DCF), but patients who relapse have decreasing remission rates with each course and can eventually become purine analog-refractory. Bendamustine and rituximab (BR) have been reported as effective with acceptable toxicity in several B-cell malignancies, particularly B-cell lymphomas and chronic lymphocytic leukemia. The structure of bendamustine contains an alkylating group and also part of cladribine, suggesting it might be useful in HCL. In one case report, bendamustine achieved a transient partial response in a patient with relapsed/refractory HCL, but its activity in other patients with this disease is not reported. The combination of DCF and rituximab (DCFR) is reported to achieve high complete remission (CR) rates in HCL in retrospective series, but prospective phase II trials of this combination have not been reported. Methods: To determine the activity of BR relative to DCFR in HCL, a randomized trial was undertaken in multiply relapsed HCL comparing the 2 regimens in which each arm could constitute a prospective phase II trial, with 2-way crossover for lack of response to or relapse from the originally assigned regimen. The primary endpoint is an overall response rate of 65% for each arm and the 2 arms will be compared with respect to response and other secondary endpoints including toxicity, response duration, and eradication of minimal residual disease (MRD). Patients received 6 cycles at 4-week intervals of rituximab 375 mg/m2 days 1 and 15 with either pentostatin at 4 mg/m2 days 1 and 15, or bendamustine days 1 and 2. To test the tolerability of bendamustine prior to randomizing 56 patients between the 2 arms, 12 non-randomized patients received BR using 70 (n=6) or 90 (n=6) mg/m2/dose of bendamustine. Doses of all agents could be delayed but not reduced. Results: A total of 20 patients are so far enrolled and the 12 patients receiving the 2 dose levels of BR are evaluable for response and toxicity. Patients had 1–6 (median 3) prior courses of purine analog and 8 (67%) had prior rituximab. All toxicity was reversible and only 1 patient at 90 mg/m2 required >2-week delay due to prolonged neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. However, this delay was only between cycles 1 and 2 and not between subsequent cycles after responding to BR. Of the 36 cycles of BR administered to each group of 6 patients on the 2 dose levels of bendamustine, 90 vs 70 mg/m2/dose, common grade 3–4 toxicities included lymphopenia (28 vs 22%), leukopenia (19 vs 17%), and thrombocytopenia (14 vs 17%). Febrile neutropenia requiring hospitalization occurred just once in 3 patients at 90 vs 0 patients at 70 mg/m2/dose. Major response was achieved in 10 (83%) of 12 patients. CR was achieved in 3 (50%) of 6 patients at each dose level, while 2 (33%) at 70 and 3 (50%) at 90 mg/m2 achieved clearance of MRD at all sites including bone marrow aspirate by flow cytometry. No patient in CR has relapsed after 8–14 (median 11) months of follow-up. Of 4 patients evaluable by clone-specific real-time PCR, previously reported sensitive to 1 HCL cell in 106 normal, 3 patients at 90 mg/m2/dose were negative. Conclusions: BR can achieve responses including CRs in multiply relapsed HCL, and its safety profile permits comparison of BR with DCFR using the more common dose level of bendamustine, 90 mg/m2 days 1 and 2. Additional patients and follow-up will be required to access durability of response and long-term eradication of MRD, and to compare BR with DCFR (Supported in part by NCI, intramural research program, NIH, Genentech, Inc, and Cephalon, Inc). Disclosures: Kreitman: Cephalon: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Use of bendamustine and rituximab for HCL. Arons:Genentech: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of the BRAF Inhibitor Vemurafenib in Hairy Cell Leukemia Patients Refractory to or Relapsed after Purine Analogs: A Phase-2 Italian Clinical Trial

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 150-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enrico Tiacci ◽  
Luca De Carolis ◽  
Pier Luigi Zinzani ◽  
Alessandro Pulsoni ◽  
Francesco Zaja ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Hairy Cell Leukemia ◽  
Braf Inhibitor ◽  
Post Treatment ◽  
The Other ◽  
Braf V600e ◽  
Morphological Evidence ◽  
Hairy Cell ◽  
Cell Leukemia

Abstract BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Hairy cell leukemia (HCL) is very sensitive to purine analogs (PAs), but ~40% of patients relapse and become progressively less responsive to these myelotoxic and immune-suppressive drugs. Having discovered the BRAF-V600E kinase-activating mutation as the genetic lesion underlying HCL (Tiacci et al, NEJM 2011;364:2305), we performed the first clinical trial of a BRAF inhibitor (vemurafenib) in refractory/relapsed HCL. In particular, this is a phase-2, academic, single-arm, Italian, multi-center (n=8) study (HCL-PG01; EudraCT 2011-005487-13). METHODS: In 11 months we enrolled 28 BRAF-V600E+ HCL patients, needing therapy due to cytopenias and including: i) 6 patients primary refractory to a PA; ii) 21 patients who relapsed early and/or repeatedly after PAs and had received a median of 4 previous therapies; and iii) a 81-year old patient showing severe myelotoxicicity after a PA (discouraging its further use). Previous treatments other than PAs included interferon, rituximab and splenectomy in 12, 14 and 8 patients, respectively. Complete remission (CR) required resolution of cytopenias (N≥1500/mmc, PLT≥100000/mmc, Hb≥11 g/dl), no morphological evidence of HCL cells in the bone marrow biopsy and blood smear, and no splenomegaly. Partial remission (PR) required resolution of cytopenias, and a ≥50% reduction of splenomegaly and of marrow and blood HCL involvement by immunophenotyping. Two patients were not evaluable as they went off-study after ≤1 week of treatment (due to drug-unrelated acute myocardial infarction and consent withdrawal after grade-3 drug-related reversible pancreatitis). RESULTS: Vemurafenib, given orally at the dose of 960 mg twice daily on an outpatient basis for a median of 16 weeks, was generally well tolerated. Drug-related adverse events (mainly arthralgias, skin toxicities, pancreatitis; no myelosuppression) were frequent, but reversible in all patients, and were typically grade 1-2. Only 7 patients developed grade 3 events, and none grade 4 events. Although we did not observe any cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas/keratoachantomas (as reported in BRAF-V600E+ melanoma patients treated with vemurafenib), 3 patients developed 2 basaliomas and 1 superficial melanoma, all treated with a simple excision. Notably, overall response rate was 96% (25/26 patients): 9/26 (34.6%) CRs and 16/26 (61.4%) PRs, obtained after a median of 8 and 9 weeks respectively. CR and PR patients included 1 and 5 primary refractory ones, respectively, as well as 4 and 10 not responding to the last prior treatment, respectively. In all CR patients immunohistochemistry showed minimal residual disease (≤10%) at the end of treatment. Six of 9 (67%) CR patients enjoyed normal blood counts at a median of 13 (range 12-15) months from the end of treatment (see Figure): 3 of these 6 patients showed no morphological evidence of HCL in the bone marrow biopsy (complying with a continuous CR) at 12, 13 and 15 months, respectively, whereas the other 3 lost the bone marrow CR status, all at 12 months. The remaining 3/9 CR patients (33%) developed a mild cytopenia (N ~1000/mmc or PLT ~80000/mmc) 5, 9 and 12 months post-treatment, respectively: in the 2nd patient the cytopenia remained stable until the last follow-up at 15 months, whereas in the other two cases it worsened requiring therapy 9 and 18 months post-treatment, respectively (see Figure). These two latter patients were recently retreated with vemurafenib for 12 and 4 weeks, and obtained a PR and a second CR. Among the 16 PR patients, 5 (31%) mantain normal blood counts at a median of 12 (range 8-17) months post-treatment (see Figure). The other 11 PR patients developed cytopenia(s) after 3 months of median follow-up (range 5-10): in 6 patients (38%) no anti-leukemic therapy was started at a median of 9 (range 6-12) months post-treatment, whereas in the remaining 5 cases (31%) cytopenia(s) worsened requiring therapy at a median of 8 (range 5-11) months of follow-up (see Figure). Four of these latter 5 patients were retreated with vemurafenib for 12 weeks: 3 cases had a minor response and the last one witnessed a second PR that lasted less than the first PR (3 versus 9 months). CONCLUSIONS: In heavily pre-treated HCL patients, a short oral course of vemurafenib was safe, and proved quickly and highly active. Retreatment with vemurafenib was able to reinduce remissions in patients relapsing after a CR, but was less effective in patients relapsing after a PR. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Off Label Use: Off-label use of vemurafenib in hairy cell leukemia will be discussed as part of a clinical research protocol..

scholarly journals Use of High Dose Cytarabine (HiDAC) for Post-Remission or Re-Induction Therapy Is Safe and Effective in Select Older AML Patients

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4422-4422
Author(s):  
Jillian Lykon ◽  
Ellen Madarang ◽  
Nina Nguyen ◽  
Wenhui Li ◽  
Sunil G. Iyer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Febrile Neutropenia ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Average Dose ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Poor Risk ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Dose Reductions

Abstract Introduction A standard therapy for fit older adults (≥60 years) with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) being treated with curative intent consists of induction chemotherapy with cytarabine and an anthracycline followed by 1-4 cycles of shorter course post-remission therapy with cytarabine +/- anthracycline. Historically, HiDAC has been reserved for younger patients due to the high incidence of cytarabine-induced neurotoxicity, febrile neutropenia, and hospital re-admissions in older patients (Mayer et al. 1994). In select older adults (e.g., those with good-risk cytogenetic/molecular abnormalities, or requiring reinduction for persistent AML), the risk/benefit for HiDAC may favor its use. Real world evidence is lacking on the safety of full dose HiDAC (total 18 grams/cycle) in fit older adults in the 60-75 age range. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of AML patients ≥60 years who received at least one cycle of HiDAC, defined as 3g/m2 every 12 hours for 6 doses, either days 1-3 or days 1, 3, 5, as post-remission therapy or primary re-induction (i.e., after failure of primary induction with 7+3 or CPX-351) between July 1, 2014 and May 28, 2021. AML risk was defined by European LeukemiaNet (ELN) guidelines. All patients had daily neurologic exams including prior to each dose of HiDAC and at the beginning of each nursing shift. The primary endpoint was tolerability, defined as average dose per cycle, rate of dose reductions, incidence of febrile neutropenia, cerebellar toxicity, and rate of hospital re-admissions. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), composite complete remission (CCR) for patients treated with HiDAC re-induction, and duration of relapse-free survival (RFS) (from day 1 of treatment) in all patients. Results From July 2014 to May 2021, 34 patients ≥60-years-old were treated with HiDAC at our center. Median age at HiDAC administration was 64 (60-73) [Table 1]. Approximately half the patients were Hispanic and male and almost all (97%) had ECOG performance scores of 0-1. HiDAC was used as post-remission therapy (following 7+3-type induction in 80%) in 25 patients and as re-induction in 14. Eleven patients (32%) were ELN favorable risk, 8 (25%) were intermediate, and 15 (44%) were poor risk. For post-remission therapy, the average total dose of cytarabine per cycle was 16.6 gm/m2 (6-18 gm/m2) and the median number of cycles was 4 (1-4) [Table 2]; 6 patients (24%) required dose reductions, the most common reason being upcoming allogeneic stem cell transplant (n=4). No cerebellar toxicity was observed. Duration of neutropenia was on average 15 days (7-53) in the re-induction group and 7.5 days (1-29) in the post-remission group, with 23 post-remission patients (92%) receiving granulocyte colony stimulating factors (G-CSF). Eleven hospital readmissions occurred, most commonly (73%) for febrile neutropenia. Early mortality rates were low, with one patient on the post-remission arm and one patient on the re-induction arm dying within 30 and 60 days, respectively, both due to sepsis. Median OS was 15.8 months (95% CI 0-31.8) in patients who received post-remission HiDAC, with 44% of patients still alive with a median follow up of 17.2 months (95% CI 7.2-55.8). Favorable risk patients (n=11) receiving post-remission HiDAC had median OS of 15.8 months (95% CI 0-43.1), while intermediate/poor risk patients (n=14) had median OS of 11.3 months (95% CI 9.3-13.2) [p=0.53]. Median OS was 9.8 months (95% CI 2.5-17.1) in patients who received HiDAC re-induction, with 29% of patients still alive with a median follow up of 28.6 months (95% CI 16.6-39.9) [Table 3]. Five patients (36%) achieved CCR after HiDAC re-induction, all of whom went on to receive post-remission HiDAC. Median RFS was 8.5 months for re-induction and 8.8 months for post-remission patients [Table 3]. Conclusions HiDAC (18 grams) can be safely given to select patients over age 60. Critical to tolerability is rigorous screening of "fitness," limiting the upper age receiving HiDAC to 75, ensuring adequate renal function and euvolemia, and advances in supportive care. Encouraging survival outcomes were observed in older adults receiving post-remission or re-induction HiDAC, independent of ELN risk. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Bradley: AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sekeres: Takeda/Millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Watts: Rafael Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Aptevo Therapeutices: Research Funding.

BRAF inhibitor treatment in classic hairy cell leukemia: a long-term follow-up study of patients treated outside clinical trials

Leukemia ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 1454-1457
Author(s):  
Nora Liebers ◽  
Tobias Roider ◽  
Jan-Paul Bohn ◽  
Isabella Haberbosch ◽  
Andreas Pircher ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Hairy Cell Leukemia ◽  
Braf Inhibitor ◽  
Hairy Cell ◽  
Cell Leukemia ◽  
Follow Up Study ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Inhibitor Treatment

scholarly journals Down-Regulation of CD25 Antigen in Hairy Cell Leukemia Patients after Treatment

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4143-4143
Author(s):  
Mirela Anghelina ◽  
Narendranath Epperla ◽  
Kerry A. Rogers ◽  
Ling Guo ◽  
Qiuhong Zhao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Hairy Cell Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Leukemic Cells ◽  
World Health ◽  
Hairy Cell ◽  
Cell Leukemia ◽  
Cd25 Expression

Abstract Background: Hairy Cell Leukemia (HCL) is a rare hematological malignancy, comprising only of 2% of all leukemias, with an estimated 900 new cases diagnosed each year in the United States. HCL displays a characteristic immunophenotypic profile that include pan-B cell markers including CD103, CD11c, and CD25. World Health Organization guidelines defines two forms of HCL, classic HCL (cHCL) and variant HCL (HCLv) as two distinct clinical entities. Patients with cHCL have a distinct immunophenotypic profile on their malignant leukemic cells including CD20+, CD19+, CD11c+, CD25+, CD103+, and CD123+, while the leukemic cells from patients with HCLv show CD11c+, CD20+ and CD19+, while lacking CD25 and CD123 expression. Some patients with cHCL will retain CD25 positivity while demonstrating negativity for other typical markers, herein termed atypical HCL (aHCL). Presence or absence of CD25 is an important determinant in classifying patients into cHCL and HCLv. Although it has previously been reported that CD25 expression may be lost during treatment with the targeted agent vemurafenib, we sought to identify whether this immunophenotypic change occurs following other treatment types, including standard purine nucleoside analog therapy and with targeted BTK inhibition. Methods: Adult patients (≥18 years) with a diagnosis of HCL whom had immunophenotype data collected before and after treatment between 2010 and 2018 were included in the study. Immunophenotype and morphological characteristics of initial and follow-up peripheral blood, bone marrow aspirate, and core biopsy specimens were reviewed and correlated with the treatment received. Results: We evaluated 30 HCL patients who underwent different therapies. All available specimens were reviewed and showed morphologic features characteristic for cHCL (n=26, 86.7%), and aHCL (n=4, 13.3%). The median age at HCL diagnosis was 50 years (44-76 years) with male predominance (76%). Patients with aHCL were treated with ibrutinib (n=2) and pentostatin (n=2). Patients with cHCL were treated with pentostatin (n=12), ibrutinib (n=8), vemurafenib (n=4), dabrafenib (n=1), and cladribine (n=1). Bone marrow analyses showed that all the patients had leukemic B-lymphocyte co-expression of CD19, CD20, CD103, CD11c, CD25, and CD123 prior to treatment. Some patients also had a smaller percentage of lymphocytes lacking CD25 expression along with the CD25 positive lymphocytes. Follow-up bone marrow and peripheral blood analysis showed that almost half (n=14, 46%) of treated patients had a partial or complete loss of CD25 expression regardless of the treatment type. Leukemic cells continued to express other HCL signature markers. Conclusion: Our study indicates that during the course of disease some patients display a loss of CD25 expression after therapy. This phenomenon was observed across different therapies and is not specific to the type of treatment. This is the first study to show treatment-dependent CD25 variability with pentostatin, ibrutinib and dabrafenib. Our results advocate for caution when using CD25 for the differential diagnosis of cHCL versus HCLv in treated patients. Future studies are needed in larger patient cohorts to determine the overall role and utility of CD25 in the diagnosis of cHCL and HCLv. Disclosures Lozanski: Genentech: Research Funding; Stem Line: Research Funding; BI: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Beckman: Research Funding; Coulter: Research Funding. Andritsos:Astra Zeneca: Consultancy; HCLF: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document